Graphical user interface (GUI) is a visual [user interface](ui.md) that uses graphical elements such as images, many distinct [colors](color.md) and fine geometrical shapes. This stands in contrast with [text user interface](tui.md) (TUI) which is also visual but only uses text for communication (TUI can further be pure line-based [command line interface](cli.md) or a graphical, grid-based text interface that mimics a true GUI, e.g. with [ASCII art](ascii_art.md)).
Expert computer users normally frown upon GUI because it is the "noobish", **inefficient, slow, limiting, cumbersome, distracting, hard to automate, hard to [test](testing.md), [capitalist](capitalism.md) [consumer](consumerism.md)-style way of interacting with computer**. GUI brings [complexity](complexity.md) and [bloat](bloat.md). GUI is like baby pictures or simple books with pictures for [illiterate people](plan9.md) and Chimpanzees, for people who need to click on boxes and have flashing strip club colors to keep them entertained, while command line is for normal adults who can read and want to do thing efficiently -- there is a reason why [programming languages](programming_language.md) are plain text (with exception of the ones literally aimed at babies in kindergarden). [Text is universal interface](unix_philosophy.md); text is a [formal language](formal_language.md) that can be handled mathematically well, it is a [stream](stream.md) of data easy to process by any languages, etc. So we try not to use GUIs and prefer the [command line](cli.md).
GUI is also bad for the following reason: **it restricts and limits the potential of a computer and our program to just realtime interaction with a human**. That is how normal people think about computers, but a programmer knows computers have much bigger potential: computer doesn't have to be just a box with screen and keyboard operated by human, computers may be interacting with each other, they may be tiny and have no screens, they may interact with machines, fly to space, sit somewhere and just record data. GUI kills all this potential, and that's what [hackers](hacking.md) dislike so much.
"[Modern](modern.md)" GUIs mostly use [callback](callback.md)-based programming, which again is more complicated than standard polling non-interactive I/O. If you need to do GUI, just use a normal infinite loop FFS.
GUI is not forbidden, it has its place, but today it's way too overused -- it should be used sparingly, only if completely necessary (e.g. in a painting program) or as a completely optional thing built upon a more [suckless](suckless.md) text interface or [API](api.md). So remember: first create a program and/or a [library](library.md) working without GUI and only then consider creating an optional GUI [frontend](frontend.md). GUI must never cripple a program that can work without it. Say no to [frameworks](framework.md)! Absolutely **NEVER** let GUI dictate what languages, tools, file formats or [paradigms](paradigm.md) you should use -- if there is to be a GUI, it must be your absolute slave, not the master.
Still, when making a GUI, you can make it [suckless](suckless.md) and lighthweight. Do your buttons need to have reflections, soft shadows and rounded anti-aliased borders? No. Do your windows need to be transparent with light refraction simulation? No. Do you need to introduce many MB of dependencies and pain such as [QT](qt.md)? No.
Also keep in mind this: **GUI doesn't have to have windows**. No, this doesn't mean you should have tiling windows instead of floating ones, this means you shouldn't have windows AT ALL. Graphical windows are a [bullshit](bullshit.md) pimp feature no one really needs. Your program can be just a full screen [DOS](dos.md)-style GUI, don't just blindly implement windows because they're everywhere. THINK, do not imitate because the established way is [cancer](cancer.md) -- your GUI doesn't have to run of 60 FPS, you probably don't need a [framebuffer](framebuffer.md), full RGB colors, clicking sounds, font rendering library (maybe you don't need text at all) etc. Use the fucking white matter you have in your skull, if there is any.
- Don't have too many elements (buttons etc.) at the screen at once, it's confusing as hell and drives noobs away. On the other hand too many submenus can be confusing as hell -- find a way to minimize the number of buttons and if there's still too many, group them let's say under 3 general tabs and that's it.
- Things must be "intuitive", i.e. behave in a way that they normally do and what the user will probably expect: e.g. main menu should be at the top of the window, not bottom right, rarely used buttons should be small and not take too much space, "destroy everything" button shouldn't be right next to "save" button, "go left" button should be placed on left, "go right" on right etc.
- Just use your brain.
- ...
The million dollar question is: **which GUI framework to use?** Ideally none. GUI is just [pixels](pixel.md), buttons are just rectangles; make your GUI simple enough so that you don't need any shitty abstraction such as widget hierarchies etc. If you absolutely need some framework, look for a suckless one; e.g. [nuklear](nuklear.md) is worth checking out. The suckless community sometimes uses pure [X11](x11.md), however that's not ideal, X11 itself is kind of bloated and it's also getting obsoleted by [Wayland](wayland.md) which is also shitty. The ideal solution is to make your GUI **[backend agnostic](portability.md)**, i.e. create your own very thin abstraction layer above the GUI system (e.g. X11) so that any other system can be plugged in if needed just by rewriting a few simple functions of your abstraction layer (see how e.g. [Anarch](anarch.md) does rendering).
Nowadays there are a great many GUI [libraries](library.md), [frameworks](framework.md), standards and [paradigms](paradigm.md), and it may be a bit hard to digest them at once.
TODO: some general shit bout graphical windows vs the "single window" mobile and web UI, analysis of the "GUI stack" (Linux framebuffer, X window, widget toolkits etc.), basic widgets etc.
