Update

soyence.md

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ Of course, once science advances, it may stop being so simple as for everyone to
 
 Basically with science we can utilize **[freedom distance](freedom_distance.md)** to measure "how much of a science" something is -- here we may define freedom distance as the average distance to someone who can completely grasp the presented "science" with ALL that's required, including understanding the results, verifying the himself and so on. If this distance is within a small village, we can consider it science; if it's several countries, it is not science anymore.
 
-Soyence popularizators also like to contaminate science with emotion, with "stories" and [heroes](hero_culture.md) and other kind of bullshit that has no place in true science: true science is pure rationality and to that emotion is an obstacle. Science is a cold, emotionless tool -- if you don't see [beauty](beauty.md) in this fact alone, science is not for you.
+Soyence popularizators also like to contaminate science with emotion, with "stories" and [heroes](hero_culture.md) and other kind of bullshit that has no place in true science: true science is pure rationality, it aims for highest objectivity possible and to that emotion is an obstacle. Science is a cold, emotionless tool -- if you don't see [beauty](beauty.md) in this fact alone, science is not for you.
 
 Some further examples of soyence:
 
@@ -35,23 +35,24 @@ Some further examples of soyence:
 - "[citation needed](citation_needed.md)" on everything
 - "Science popularization" as in building authority of so called "scientists" so as to create a political capital.
 - "This extremely lucrative [Covid](covid.md) vaccine made by us in record time is absolutely safe, don't dare question it, just take it 5 times a year and pay us each time you do, don't mind any side effects." --Big Pharma
-- "You can't trust your everyday experience or things you see with your own eyes, only trust our SCIENTISTS."
+- "You can't trust your everyday experience or things you see with your own eyes, only trust our SCIENTISTS, they know better."
 - "Science says [god](god.md) doesn't exist." aka reddit [atheism](atheism.md)
 - "We can't believe this because it wasn't peer censored/fact checked and/or it didn't pass the [null ritual](null_ritual.md) and/or it wasn't published in a journal on our approved literature list." (--[Wikipedia](wikipedia.md))
 - "This gender studies expert has proven sex is a racial construct and has no biological meaning. You disagree? Well, do you have a PhD in gender studies? No? Then shut up you fucking sexist."
 - "This goes against SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS therefore it's pseudoscience and [conspiracy theory](conspiracy_theory.md)."
 - "This research is racist.", using terms such as "scientific racism".
+- Bullshit "fields" like "ecology communication" and whatnot.
 - This guy's research is invalid because in his spare time he makes videos on ufology and other "conspiracy theories", his REPUTATION AND CREDIBILITY is destroyed.
 - "We should burn these old books that say things we don't like, just in case. When Nazis did it it was different."
 - Strategically setting up experiments and/or cherrypicking facts (as well as censoring inconvenient counter evidence) so as to achieve desired results :]]]
 - "This research was made by a [racist](racism.md) so it is invalid, also we should [lynch](cancel_culture.md) the guy just in case."
-- Neil de grass/Morgan Freeman "documentaries"
+- Neil de grass/Morgan Freeman "documentaries", emotional "science" documentaries with famous actors and a lot of "PhD" women talking heads that make wild gesticulations and excited faces trying to tell you how EXCITING science is by suggesting there must be alien life because there are so many planets or by showing you black holes, explosive chemical reactions etc.
 - Deducing cool facts on TV about extinct animals from their skull shapes is Neil De grass stamp of approval legit thumbs up paleonthology science yay! :)))) But trying in on humans ([phrenology](phrenology.md)) is a bad bad NONO PSEUDOSCIENCE, neil de grass frown :(((
-- "We can totally trust the results of commercial research."
-- "These negative results are useful but unexciting so let's not publish them, we gotta entertain our readers to stay on the market. We GOTTA TELL INSPIRATIONAL STORIES with our papers." --soyence journals
-- "No, you can't research the details of historic events such as Holocaust." (see anti [Holocaust](holocaust.md) denial laws)
+- "We can totally trust the results of commercial research. They will be objective and sincerely publish even results that will ruin their business because even CEOs are moral people and wouldn't dare lie even if that should cost them their career."
+- "These negative results are useful but unexciting so let's not publish them, we gotta entertain our readers to stay on the market. We GOTTA TELL INSPIRATIONAL STORIES with our papers. We have to publish exciting papers about which we can also make YouTube videos for our channel." --soyence journals
+- "No, you can't research the details of historic events such as Holocaust. It is declared to have happened like this and if you suggest otherwise, you go to prison." (see anti [Holocaust](holocaust.md) denial laws)
 - great part of [economics](economics.md)
-- "Feeling sexually attracted to 17.99 years old chick is a serious mental illness."
+- "Feeling sexually attracted to 17.99 years old chick is a serious mental illness, please consider lobotomy and castration. 18.00 is OK."
 - "[pedophilia](pedophilia.md) is a mental illness while pure [homosexuality](gay.md) is not"
 - ...