drummyfish/less_retarded_wiki
5
2
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Update

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Miloslav Ciz 2022-11-20 14:37:37 +01:00
parent 2184e73b24
commit 13657eca24
1 changed files with 3 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
feminism.md
View file

@ -4,4 +4,6 @@
Feminism is a [fascist](fascism.md) [terrorist](terrorism.md) [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) movement aiming for establishing female as the superior gender, for social revenge on men and gaining political power, e.g. that over [language](political_correctness.md). Similarly to [LGBT](lgbt.md), feminism is hugely violent, [toxic](toxic.md) and [harmful](harmful.md), based on [brainwashing](brainwashing.md), [bullying](bullying.md) (e.g. the [metoo](metoo.md) campaign) and [propaganda](propaganda.md).
If anything's clear, then that feminism doesn't care about gender equality. Firstly it is not called *gender equality movement* but *feminism*, i.e. for-female, and as we know, [name plays a huge role](name_is_important.md). Indeed, women have historically been oppressed and needed support, but once that support reaches equality -- which has basically already happened a long time ago now -- feminist movement will, if only by [social inertia](social_inertia.md), keep pursuing more advantages for women (what else should a movement called *feminism* do?), i.e. at this point the new goal has already become female superiority. Another proof is that feminists care about things such as wage gap but of course absolutely don't give a damn about opposite direction inequality, such as men dying on average much younger than women etc. And of course, when men establish "men rights" movements to address this, suddenly feminists see those as "fascist", "toxic" and "violent" and try to destroy such movements.
If anything's clear, then that feminism doesn't care about gender equality. Firstly it is not called *gender equality movement* but *feminism*, i.e. for-female, and as we know, [name plays a huge role](name_is_important.md). Indeed, women have historically been oppressed and needed support, but once that support reaches equality -- which has basically already happened a long time ago now -- feminist movement will, if only by [social inertia](social_inertia.md), keep pursuing more advantages for women (what else should a movement called *feminism* do?), i.e. at this point the new goal has already become female superiority. Another proof is that feminists care about things such as wage gap but of course absolutely don't give a damn about opposite direction inequality, such as men dying on average much younger than women etc. And of course, when men establish "men rights" movements to address this, suddenly feminists see those as "fascist", "toxic" and "violent" and try to destroy such movements.
Apparently in Korea feminists already practice segregation, they separate parking spots for men and women so as to prevent women bumping into men or meeting a man late at night because allegedly men are more aggressive and dangerous. Now this is pretty ridiculous, this is exactly the same as if they separated e.g. parking lots for black and white people because black people are statistically more aggressive and involved in crime, you wouldn't want to meet them at night. So, do we still want to pretend feminists are not fascist?