Update

chess.md

@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ Chess as a game is not and cannot be [copyrighted](copyright.md), but **can ches
 
 ## Chess In General
 
-Chess evolved from ancient board games in India (most notably Chaturanga) in about 6th century -- some sources say that in chess predecessor games dice was used to determine which man a player was allowed to move but that once dice were banned because of hazard games, we got the variant without any element of chance. Nowadays the game is internationally governed by **FIDE** which has taken the on role of an authority that defines the official rules: FIDE rules are considered to be the standard chess rules. FIDE also organizes tournaments, promotes the game and keeps a list of registered players whose performance it rates with so called **[Elo](elo.md)** system --⁠ based on the performance it also grants titles such as **Grandmaster** (GM, strongest), **Internation Master** (IM, second strongest) or **Candidate Master** (CM). A game of chess is so interesting in itself that chess is usually not played for money like many other games ([poker](poker.md), [backgammon](backgammon.md), ...).
+Chess evolved from ancient board games in India (most notably Chaturanga) in about 6th century -- some sources say that in chess predecessor games dice was used to determine which man a player was allowed to move but that once dice were banned because of hazard games, we got the variant without any element of chance. Nowadays the game is internationally governed by **FIDE** which has taken the on role of an authority that defines the official rules: FIDE rules are considered to be the standard chess rules. FIDE also organizes tournaments, promotes the game and keeps a list of registered players whose performance it rates with so called **[Elo](elo.md)** system --⁠ based on the performance it also grants titles such as **Grandmaster** (GM, strongest), **International Master** (IM, second strongest) or **Candidate Master** (CM). A game of chess is so interesting in itself that chess is usually not played for money like many other games ([poker](poker.md), [backgammon](backgammon.md), ...).
 
 The mastery of chess is often divided into two main areas (it is also common to divide strong players into these two categories depending on where their main strength lies):
 

gay.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Gay
 
-Homosexuality is a sexual orientation and [disorder](disease.md) (of course, not necessarily a BAD one) which makes individuals sexually attracted primarily to the same sex, i.e. males to males and females to females. A homosexual individual is called gay (stylized as gaaaaaaaaay), homo or even [faggot](faggot.md), [females](woman.md) are called lesbians. The word *gay* is also used as a synonym for anything [bad](bad.md). About 2% of people suffer from homosexuality. The opposite of homosexuality, i.e. the normal, natural sexual orientation primarily towards the opposite sex, is called heterosexuality or being *straight*. Homosexuality is not to be confused with [bisexuality](bisexuality.md) -- here we are talking about pure homosexuality, i.e. a greatly prevailing attraction mostly towards the same sex.
+Homosexuality is a sexual orientation and [disorder](disease.md) (of course, not necessarily a BAD one) which makes individuals sexually attracted primarily to the same sex, i.e. males to males and females to females. A homosexual individual is called gay (stylized as gaaaaaaaaay), homo or even [faggot](faggot.md), [females](woman.md) are called lesbians. The word *gay* is also used as a synonym for anything [bad](bad.md). About 2% of people suffer from homosexuality. The opposite of homosexuality, i.e. the normal, natural sexual orientation primarily towards the opposite sex, is called heterosexuality or being *straight*. Homosexuality is not to be confused with [bisexuality](bisexuality.md) -- here we are talking about pure homosexuality, i.e. a greatly prevailing attraction mostly towards the same sex. Some famous gay men were for example Freddie Mercury or [Alan Turing](turing.md) (actually that's probably all).
 
 For an unenlightened reader coming from the brainwashland: this article is not "offensive", it is just telling uncensored truth. Be reminded that [LRS](lrs.md) is not advocating any discrimination, on the contrary we advocate [absolute social equality](less_retarded_society.md) and [love](love.md) of all living beings, despite some having disorders or being weird. Your indoctrination has made you equate political incorrectness with oppression and hate; to see the truth, you have to [unlearn this](unretard.md) -- see for example our [FAQ](faq.md).
 

gnu.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ The GNU/Linux operating system has several variants in a form of a few GNU appro
 **If we still have a bit of freedom in computing nowadays, it is largely to GNU** -- this can't be stressed enough. But although GNU is great and has been one of the best things to happen in software ever, it also has **many flaws**, for example:
 
 - **GNU programs are typically [bloated](bloat.md)** -- although compared to [Windows](windows.md) GNU programs are really light as a feather and though GNU programs are also in many cases (but not always) quite optimized, their source code, judged from strictly [suckless](suckless.md) perspective, is mostly huge, which many view as a big issue (it's a common theme, there are [jokes](joke.md) such as GNU actually meaning *Gigantic and Nasty but Unavoidable* and so on). This is likely because GNU chooses to [battle](fight_culture.md) proprietary programs, often by trying to beat them at their own game, so features are preferred over [minimalism](minimalism.md) to stay competitive.
-- **GNU also doesn't mind proprietary non-functional data** (e.g. assets in video games). This goes against [free culture](free_culture.md) and many other free software groups, notably e.g. [Debian](debian.md). Justifications for this range from "data itself can't be harmful" (false), through "we just focus on software" to "we need GNU to be more popular" (i.e. compatible with proprietary games and so on). GNU is also generally **NOT supportive of [free culture](free_culture.md) and even uses copyright to prohibit modifications of their propaganda texts**: the [GFDL](gfdl.md) license they use for texts may contain sections that are prohibited from being modified and so are non-free by definition. They also try to "protect" their names, you can't use the name "GNU" without their permission and so on. This sucks big time and shows some of the movement's darker side.
+- **GNU also doesn't mind proprietary non-functional data** (e.g. assets in video games). This goes against [free culture](free_culture.md) and many other free software groups, notably e.g. [Debian](debian.md). Justifications for this range from "data itself can't be harmful" (false), through "we just focus on software" to "we need GNU to be more popular" (i.e. compatible with proprietary games and so on). GNU is also generally **NOT supportive of [free culture](free_culture.md) and even uses copyright to prohibit modifications of their propaganda texts**: the [GFDL](gfdl.md) license (aka the propaganda license) they use for texts may contain sections that are prohibited from being modified and so are non-free by definition. They also try to "protect" their names, you can't use the name "GNU" without their permission and so on. This sucks big time and shows some of the movement's darker side.
 - **GNU is leaning towards dystopian, [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md)-style thought control**. Now of course let us say GNU does a lot of good and is not (at least yet) nowhere near as evil as any [corporation](corporation.md) for example, however some big red flags appear for example in their *Free System Distribution Guidelines* (FSDG) by which they POLITICALLY [censor](censorship.md) software -- let us repeat that political censorship is taking place here, not just filtering of non-free software. FSDG will for example exclude any software from GNU approved repositories which merely *recommends* proprietary software OR *allows* installing it. This here is an authority doing thinking and ethical judgments for the people. It's without question we disapprove of proprietary software too of course, but it should never be the case that authorities should filter works for users based on their interpretation of the work, that is extremely, extremely dangerous and a repeatedly proven recipe for disaster. The service which software repository offers to the user must only ever be a simple, almost automated check -- for example of whether a repository has a free license -- but it must NEVER do thinking for the user. And this is what GNU does.
 - **GNU greatly pushes [copyleft](copyleft.md)**, which we, as well as many others, oppose.
 - **GNU embraces complexity, plays the corporate game and rejects the true way of freedom through [minimalism](minimalism.md)**. GNU basically just makes a mantra of "license with 4 freedoms on every software" and will mostly ignore everything else, they'll just do whatever it takes to stick with the mantra, i.e. GNU tries to achieve popularity, it tries to [fight](fight_culture.md) corporations, gets into activism, it will abuse copyright -- basically GNU wants to become a "superpower of freedom", it doesn't mind hierarchy, state, control, it wants to replace corporations in holding the power over technology, naively believing that it will be using the power for good. That's why they embrace complexity and harmful ways of [capitalist software](capitalist_software.md) (e.g. "GUI in everything", "fuck Unix", ...), that is why they simply copy proprietary software 1 to 1, just with a free license, it helps them be popular (people can drop in replace their proprietary software with GNU software), it also helps them get a [monopoly](bloat_monopoly.md) they don't mind (remember, they even ask people to transfer their copyright to them) as they DO want to become a centralized superpower. Where corporations push JavaScript on websites, GNU will just try to make sure the JavaScript has a free license, instead of rejecting the idea of JavaScript on websites. Where a corporation makes a "smart home", GNU will try to do the same, just with free software, instead of rejecting such a dumb idea in the first place. Anyone who ever saw anything from [history](history.md) knows it's not possible for a good superpower to exist -- no matter how pure it starts, with power WILL come corruption no matter what, any superpower will ALWAYS become evil. The TRUE way of freedom is simply abolishing all superpowers, embracing minimalism and giving power to the people instead of trying to fix maximalism and believe a monopoly will somehow be good. Just take a look at [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) as a recent example of how these things end. This philosophy is what helps GNU be big in short term but it's also what will kill it in the long term.

history.md

@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ At the beginning of 1991 [Tim Berners-Lee](berners_lee.md) created the **[World
 
 Shortly after the **[Soviet Union](ussr.md) dissolved** and on 25 August 1991 **[Linus Torvalds](linus_torvalds.md) announced [Linux](linux.md)**, his project for a completely [free as in freedom](free_software.md) Unix-like [operating system](os.md) kernel. Linux would become part of [GNU](gnu.md) and later one of the biggest and most successful software projects in history. It would end up powering Internet servers and supercomputers as well as desktop computers of a great number of users. Linux proved that free software works and surpasses proprietary systems.
 
-After this very recent history follows, it's hard to judge which recent events will be of historical significance much later. 1990s have seen a huge growth of computer power, video [games](game.md) such as [Doom](doom.md) led to development of [GPU](gpu.md)s and high quality computer graphics along with a wide adoption of computers by common people, which in turn helped the further growth of Internet. In around mid 90s the [web](www.md) overtook [gopher](gopher.md) in popularity and started to become the forefront of the Internet. Late 90s saw the rise of the ["open source" movement](open_source.md) ([OSI](osi.md) was established in 1998). Worthy of mention is also the first animal cloned from an adult cell, sheep named Dolly, in 1996. In 1997 computer first beat human world [chess](chess.md) champion, it was the famous Kasparov vs [Deep Blue](deep_blue.md) match. February 15 1999 was the [Windows](windows.md) refund day on which GNU/Linux users tried, in accord with Windows EULA, to refund Windows shipped with laptops they bought, and were subsequently given a middle finder by [Micro$oft](microsoft.md). Year 2000 was infamously preceded by the [Y2K](y2k.md) hysteria, the [fear](fear_culture.md) of technological [collapse](collapse.md) that was to be caused by computers flipping from year 99 to 00 -- this of course didn't happen. With the year 2000 [21st century](21st_century.md) starts. Shortly after 2000 [Lawrence Lessig](lessig.md) founded [Creative Commons](creative_commons.md), an organization that came hand in hand with the [free culture](free_culture.md) movement inspired by the [free software movement](free_software.md). At this point over 50% of US households had a computer. In 2003 the whole human [DNA](dna.md) was sequenced after 13 years of international collaborative effort. From 2005 we've seen a boom of [social networks](social_net.md) like [Facebook](facebook.md), [Twitter](twitter.md) and [YouTube](youtube.md) and also skyrocketing popularity of online and massively online games, owing a lot to the gigantic success of [World of Warcraft](wow.md); all of these contributed to making Internet and computers one of the most mainstream and lucrative things, ruining everything. Cell phones became a commonly owned item and after about 2005 so called "[smart](smart.md) phones" and other "smart" devices replaced them as a universal communication device capable of connecting to the Internet. Year 2010 seems to be the turning point beyond which societal decline accelerated immensely; 1990s seem to have been the peak of society, after the year 2000 society started to slowly decline but by inertia things were still relatively good for about another decade. In 2011 [Minecraft](minecraft.md) was released. After this we've seen the rise of [Bitcoin](bitcoin.md) and other [cryptocurrencies](crypto.md). Before 2020 we've also seen a brief spike in popularity of [VR](vr.md) (that would diminish again) and a huge advancement in [neural network](neural_network.md) [Artificial Intelligence](ai.md) which will likely be the topic of the future. 2022 saw the release of [ChatGPT](chatgpt.md), the AI chatbot that made a worldwide sensation by its human-like nature and intelligence -- the event will likely be seen as the moment of transition to a truly human-like AI. [Quantum computers](quantum.md) are being highly researched with already existing primitive prototypes; this will also likely be very important in the following years. Besides AI there were also [drones](drone.md), electromobiles, robotic Mars exploration and other things. However the society and technology have been in decadence for some time now, [capitalism](capitalism.md) has pushed technology to become hostile and highly [abusive to users](capitalist_software.md), extreme [bloat](bloat.md) of technology causes highly inefficient, extremely expensive and unreliable technology. In addition society is dealing with a lot of serious issues such as the [global warming](global_warming.md) and many people are foreseeing a [collapse of society](collapse.md).
+After this very recent history follows, it's hard to judge which recent events will be of historical significance much later. [1990s](90s.md) have seen a huge growth of computer power, video [games](game.md) such as [Doom](doom.md) led to development of [GPU](gpu.md)s and high quality computer graphics along with a wide adoption of computers by common people, which in turn helped the further growth of Internet. In around mid 90s the [web](www.md) overtook [gopher](gopher.md) in popularity and started to become the forefront of the Internet. Late 90s saw the rise of the ["open source" movement](open_source.md) ([OSI](osi.md) was established in 1998). Worthy of mention is also the first animal cloned from an adult cell, sheep named Dolly, in 1996. In 1997 computer first beat human world [chess](chess.md) champion, it was the famous Kasparov vs [Deep Blue](deep_blue.md) match. February 15 1999 was the [Windows](windows.md) refund day on which GNU/Linux users tried, in accord with Windows EULA, to refund Windows shipped with laptops they bought, and were subsequently given a middle finder by [Micro$oft](microsoft.md). Year 2000 was infamously preceded by the [Y2K](y2k.md) hysteria, the [fear](fear_culture.md) of technological [collapse](collapse.md) that was to be caused by computers flipping from year 99 to 00 -- this of course didn't happen. With the year 2000 [21st century](21st_century.md) starts. Shortly after 2000 [Lawrence Lessig](lessig.md) founded [Creative Commons](creative_commons.md), an organization that came hand in hand with the [free culture](free_culture.md) movement inspired by the [free software movement](free_software.md). At this point over 50% of US households had a computer. In 2003 the whole human [DNA](dna.md) was sequenced after 13 years of international collaborative effort. From 2005 we've seen a boom of [social networks](social_net.md) like [Facebook](facebook.md), [Twitter](twitter.md) and [YouTube](youtube.md) and also skyrocketing popularity of online and massively online games, owing a lot to the gigantic success of [World of Warcraft](wow.md); all of these contributed to making Internet and computers one of the most mainstream and lucrative things, ruining everything. Cell phones became a commonly owned item and after about 2005 so called "[smart](smart.md) phones" and other "smart" devices replaced them as a universal communication device capable of connecting to the Internet. Year 2010 seems to be the turning point beyond which societal decline accelerated immensely; 1990s seem to have been the peak of society, after the year 2000 society started to slowly decline but by inertia things were still relatively good for about another decade. In 2011 [Minecraft](minecraft.md) was released. After this we've seen the rise of [Bitcoin](bitcoin.md) and other [cryptocurrencies](crypto.md). Before 2020 we've also seen a brief spike in popularity of [VR](vr.md) (that would diminish again) and a huge advancement in [neural network](neural_network.md) [Artificial Intelligence](ai.md) which will likely be the topic of the future. 2022 saw the release of [ChatGPT](chatgpt.md), the AI chatbot that made a worldwide sensation by its human-like nature and intelligence -- the event will likely be seen as the moment of transition to a truly human-like AI. [Quantum computers](quantum.md) are being highly researched with already existing primitive prototypes; this will also likely be very important in the following years. Besides AI there were also [drones](drone.md), electromobiles, robotic Mars exploration and other things. However the society and technology have been in decadence for some time now, [capitalism](capitalism.md) has pushed technology to become hostile and highly [abusive to users](capitalist_software.md), extreme [bloat](bloat.md) of technology causes highly inefficient, extremely expensive and unreliable technology. In addition society is dealing with a lot of serious issues such as the [global warming](global_warming.md) and many people are foreseeing a [collapse of society](collapse.md).
 
 ## Recent History Of Technology
 

idiot_fallacy.md

@@ -8,11 +8,12 @@ Some examples include:
 
 - "He likes guns, therefore he also likes [war](war.md), violence, hunting etc."
 - "He likes to watch gore videos, therefore he is a violent man and supports violence in real life."
-- "He isn't politically correct, therefore he is a rightist."
+- "He studied X so he absolutely loves everything related to X.", e.g. "He studied theoretical [computer science](compsci.md) so he likes repairing broken smart phones, installing antiviruses for other people, doing IT support or being a CEO of a company that sells computers." In fact studying X mostly makes you furiously hate most things relates to it.
-- "He opposes bullying of [pedophiles](pedophilia.md), therefore he is a pedophile." -- This reasoning is guaranteed to be made by every single [American](usa.md) as Americans cannot comprehend any other motive than [self interest](self_interest.md), to them it's physically impossible to try to benefit a group one is not part of.
+- "He isn't [politically correct](political_correctness.md), therefore he is a rightist supporting Jew genocide."
+- "He opposes bullying and executions of [pedophiles](pedophilia.md), therefore he is a pedophile and his only life goal is to rape as many children as possible." -- This reasoning is guaranteed to be made by every single [American](usa.md) as Americans cannot comprehend any other motive than [self interest](self_interest.md), to them it's physically impossible to try to benefit a group one is not part of.
 - "He opposes [bloat](bloat.md), therefore he supports the [privacy](privacy.md) and [productivity](productivity_cult.md) hysteria and his hobby must be ricing tiling window managers."
 - "He acknowledges the existence and significance of [human races](race.md), therefore he is hostile to other races and supports their genocide."
-- "He plays competitive games so he must think having society based on competition is a good idea."
+- "He plays competitive games so he must think having society based on [competition](competition.md) is a good idea."
 - "He was born in country X so he likes and supports country X."
 - "He dislikes/opposes a certain social group, therefore he wants to eliminate that group by any means necessary and he cannot love anyone in that group or anyone who supports that group."
 - "He opposes [capitalism](capitalism.md), therefore he supports  [gay fascism](lgbt.md), [woman fascism](feminism.md) and [Marxism](marxism.md)." (this is also an [American](usa.md) [false dichotomy](false_dichotomy.md))

iq.md

@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
 Please wear a hard hat when reading this page.
 ```
 
+*See also https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_quotient.*
+
 IQ (intelligence quotient) is a non-perfect but [still kind of useful](good_enough.md) measure of one's intelligence, it is a numeric score one gets on a standardized test that tries to estimate his intellectual ability at different tasks ([logic](logic.md), [memory](memory.md), language skills, spatial skills, ...) and express them with a single number. The tests are standardized and the scoring is usually tuned so that the value 100 means average intelligence -- anything above means smarter than average, anything below dumber than average. IQ is a quite controversial topic because it shows intellectual differences between [races](race.md) and sexes and clashes with [political correctness](political_correctness.md), there is also a great debate about "what intelligence even is" (i.e. what the test should measure, what weight should be given to different areas of intelligence), if it is even reasonable to simplify "intelligence" down to a single number, how much of a cultural bias there is (do we really measure pure intellectual capacity or just familiarity with some concepts of our western culture?) and the accuracy of the tests is also highly debated (which can be an issue if we e.g. start using IQ tests to determine who should get higher education and who shouldn't) -- nevertheless it's unquestionable that IQ DOES correlate with intellectual abilities, IQ tests are a tool that really does something, the debates mostly revolve around how useful the tool is, how it should be used, what conclusions can we make with it and so on. Basically only people with the lowest IQ say that IQ is completely useless. The testing of IQ was developed only during 20th century, so we don't know IQs of old geniuses -- if you read somewhere (including this article) that Newton's IQ was 200, it's just someone's wild guess.
 
 IQ follows the normal [probability](probability.md) distribution, i.e. it is modeled by the [bell curve](bell_curve.md) that says how many people of the total population will fall into any given range of IQ score. Though this has been challenged too, one of the basic laws of human stupidity says that the probability that someone is stupid is independent of any other of his characteristics (education, profession, race, sanity, ...). There are various IQ scales, almost all use the Gaussian (bell) curve that's centered at 100 (i.e. 100 is supposed to mean the average intelligence) and have [standard deviation](standard_deviation.md) 15 (but other have been used as well) -- this is what we'll implicitly suppose in the article from now. This means that about 2/3rds of people will fall in the range 85 to 115 but no more than 1% will have IQ higher than 145 or lower than 55. Sometimes you may also encounter so called **percentile** which says what percentage of population is below your IQ.
@@ -64,6 +66,8 @@ TODO: more details, history, where to measure (web vs Mensa vs SAT etc.)
 
 *IQ distribution along with approximate placement of certain groups and individuals (each line represents another Gaussian distribution so the borders aren't strict). Notice how interesting people are either far to the right or far to the left. Also notice how the smartest you've rarely heard of while you've heard of all the dumbest.*
 
+The following are **average IQ values for various selected countries**, according to the book *IQ and the Wealth of Nations* (SD 15). [Australia](australia.md): 98, Brazil: 87, Canada: 97, China: 100, Cuba: 85, Croatia: 90, [Czechia](czechia.md): 97, Ethiopia: 63, Equator Guinea: 59 (dumbest country of all), France: 98, Greece: 92, India: 81, Iran: 84, Italy: 102, Japan: 105, [Mexico](mexico.md): 87, [Nigeria](nigeria.md): 67, Spain: 97, South Korea: 106 (smartest country of all), [UK](uk.md): 100, [USA](usa.md): 98, Zimbabwe: 66.
+
 **IQ and [race](race.md) and [sex](sex.md)**: IQ is correlated with race and sex. The following is a comparison of average IQs of groups with various combination of the two factors:
 
 *men (Jew) > men (Asian) > men (White) > men (Brown) > women (Jew) > women (Asian) > women (White) > women (Brown) > men (Black) > women (Black)*
@@ -76,7 +80,7 @@ TODO: more details, history, where to measure (web vs Mensa vs SAT etc.)
 
 { It's still more and more complicated the more you think of it, even for example success in mathematics may sometimes depend less on pure math skills and more on non-mathematical kind of intelligence, e.g. that of observation skills and communication -- that's what academia is about. Yes, you need some creativity, but the ability to quickly understand ideas of others may sometimes be superior, an idea you "steal" from someone else is as useful as idea you came up with yourself, you need to catch many ideas of others and connect them together; on the other hand struggling with communication is sometimes simply like not speaking a common language at all. Thinking back I for one have always been quite retarded at understanding what others wanted to say, even simple things, so in classes I frequently wouldn't understand what was being taught while others understood, but it wasn't because I wouldn't understand the concept itself, I rather didn't understand the way the teacher explained it because (I think) I think differently about things. When we were given tasks to solve on our own, I usually beat my classmates because that was only about creative intelligence, not communication, and in this I think I was better than most of my peers. I didn't go for PhD later on while some of my classmates did -- TBH I don't think it's because they were necessarily more intelligent in general (many of them for sure were), but because they felt better in this world of communication, sharing papers, talking to others, understanding their ideas and collaborating, they had the "better mix" of intelligence for today's academic world -- this I always had problems with, so it contributed to my decision to not go there. This is just to show that this world is quite complex. ~drummyfish }
 
-**Fun fact**: in some US countries idiots and similar low IQ level classes are legally prohibited from voting :D
+**Fun fact**: in some US states idiots and similar low IQ level classes are legally prohibited from voting :D
 
 It's been observed that the **IQ of a group** is roughly equal to the IQ of its least intelligent member divided by the number of group members.
 

jokes.md

@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ Also remember the worst thing you can do to a joke is put a [disclaimer](disclai
 - Autocorrect is my worst enema.
 - If man speaks in the forest and there is no [woman](woman.md) around to hear him, is he still wrong?
 - Hey I won a box with lifetime supply of condoms in an [assembly](assembly.md) programming competition! Turns out the box was just empty.
+- Hey, do you like podcasts? I don't need that, I have schizophrenia.
 - The new version of [Windows](windows.md) is going to be backdoor free! The backdoor will be free of charge.
 
 ## See Also

lgbt.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Note that **not all gay people support LGBT**, even though LGBT wants you to thi
 
 Gay fascists furthermore live off of attention so they love to wear bizarre clothes in all existing AND nonexisting [colors](color.md) at once, further combined with ugly hairstyles and [tattoos](tattoo.md) so that they literally look like clowns from mental asylum or that creepy McDonald's mascot. They also love to show their genitalia in the streets -- though they are pedophobes, they think it's a peer reviewed fact that it's natural for a child to see mommy have threesome with her frens.
 
-LGBT works towards establishing [newspeak](newspeak.md) and [thought crime](though_crime.md), their "pride" parades are not unlike military parades, they're meant to establish fear of their numbers. LGBT targets children and young whom their propaganda floods every day with messages like *"being gay makes you cool and more interesting"* so that they have a higher probability of developing homosexuality to further increase their ranks in the future. They also push the idea of children having same sex parents for the same reason.
+LGBT works towards establishing [newspeak](newspeak.md) and [thought crime](thought_crime.md), their "pride" parades are not unlike military parades, they're meant to establish fear of their numbers. LGBT targets children and young whom their propaganda floods every day with messages like *"being gay makes you cool and more interesting"* so that they have a higher probability of developing homosexuality to further increase their ranks in the future. They also push the idea of children having same sex parents for the same reason.
 
 LGBT oppose [straight](straight.md) people as they solely focus on gaining more and more ["rights"](rights_culture.md) and power only for their approved orientations. They also highly bully other, unpopular sexual orientations such as [pedophiles](pedophilia.md) (not necessarily child rapists), [necrophiles](necro.md) and [zoophiles](zoophilia.md), simply because supporting these would hurt their popularity and political power. They label the non-approved orientations a "disorder", they push people of such orientations to [suicide](suicide.md) and generally just do all the bad things that society used to do to gay people in the past -- the fact that these people are often gay people who know what it's like to be bullied like that makes it this even much more sad and disgusting. To them it doesn't matter you never hurt anyone, if they find some [loli](loli.md) images on your computer, you're gonna get lynched mercilessly.
 

lrs_dictionary.md

@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ WORK IN PROGRESS
 | Macintosh                                  | Macintoy, Macintrash, Maggotbox                             |
 | [Microsoft](microsoft.md)                  | Microshit                                                   |
 | [microtransaction](microtransaction.md)    | microtheft                                                  |
+| [Minecraft](minecraft.md)                  | Minecrap                                                    |
 | [moderation](moderation.md)                | [censorship](censorship.md)                                 |
 | [modern](modern.md)                        | malicious, shitty                                           |
 | [.NET](dot_net.md)                         | .NEET                                                       |
@@ -82,6 +83,7 @@ WORK IN PROGRESS
 | [openbsd](openbsd.md)                      | openbased                                                   |
 | peer-reviewed                              | peer-censored                                               |
 | "person"                                   | man, p-word                                                 |
+| Photoshopped                               | [GIMP](gimp.md)ed                                           |
 | [playstation](playstation.md)              | gaystation                                                  |
 | plug and play                              | plug and pray                                               |
 | proprietary service                        | disservice                                                  |

nigeria.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+# Nigeria
+
+Nigeria is the country with second most [racist](racism.md) name, right after [Niger](niger.md).
+
+## See Also
+
+- [nigeria](nigeria.md)
+- [niggeria](niggeria.md)
+- [niger](niger.md)
+- [nigger](nigger.md)

nigger.md

@@ -49,7 +49,11 @@ In the [gender studies](gender_studies.md) circles there is an academic debate a
 
 - [nginx](nginx.md)
 - [negro](negro.md)
+- [niger](niger.md)
+- [nigeria](nigeria.md)
+- [niggeria](niggeria.md)
 - [faggot](faggot.md)
+- [fagot](fagot.md)
 - [cracker](cracker.md)
 - [retard](retard.md)
 - [chink](chink.md)

old.md

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
 # Old
 
-Nowadays old positively correlates with better. For comparison of new and old see [modern tech](modern.md).
+Nowadays older positively correlates with better. To quote someone famous: you can disagree with it, but that's about all you can do about it.
+
+For comparison of new and old see [modern tech](modern.md).

race.md

@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ Instead of the word *race* the politically correct camp uses words such as *ethn
 
 Pseudoleft uses cheap, logically faulty arguments to deny the existence of race; for example that there are no clear objective boundaries between races -- of course there are not, but how does that imply nonexistence of race? The same argument could also be given even e.g. for the term *species* (see e.g. ring species in which the boundaries are not clear) so as to invalidate it; yet we see no one doubting the existence of various species of animals. That's like saying that color doesn't exist because given any two distinct colors there exists a gradual transition, or that [music](music.md) and noise are the same thing because objectively no clear line can be drawn between them. If by this argument races don't exist, then movie genres, psychological disorders, emotions or political opinions also don't exist.
 
-The politically correct camp further argues that there wasn't enough time for human races to develop significant differences as evolution operates on scales of millions of years while the evolution of modern humans was taking part about in an order of magnitude smaller time scale (but of course they won't have any objections to articles that claim that e.g. [women](woman.md) are "catching up" to men in brain size in span of mere years). However it has been shown that **evolution can be extremely fast and make great changes in mere DECADES**, e.g. in cases of rapid environment change (shown e.g. in a documentary *Laws of the Lizard* on anoles that show signs of evolutionary change only after 14 years, also see e.g. the book *The 10,000 Year Explosion* talking about actual acceleration of human evolution) and interbreeding with other (sub)species (e.g. Denisovan or Neanderthals, which European population bred with but African population didn't), which did occur when humans spread around the world and had to live in vastly different conditions -- successful civilizations themselves actually furthermore started to rapidly change their environment to something that favors very different traits. It has for example been found that average male brain increased from 1372 gram in 1860 to 1424 grams in 1940, a very significant change in LESS THAN A CENTURY. We can take a look at the enormous differences between dog breeds which have been bred mostly during only the last 200 years and whose differences are enormous and not only physical, but also that of intelligence and temperament -- yes, the breeding of dogs has been selective, but a rapid change in environment may have a similar accelerating effect, and the process in humans still took many tens of thousands of years. For example races of slaves were probably selectively bred, even if unintentionally, as physically fit slaves were more likely to survive than those who were smart; similarly in prospering civilizations, e.g. that of Europe, where trade, business and development of technology (e.g. military) became more crucial for survival than in primitive desert or jungle civilizations, different traits such as intelligence became preferred by evolution.
+The politically correct camp further argues that there wasn't enough time for human races to develop significant differences as evolution operates on scales of millions of years while the evolution of modern humans was taking part about in an order of magnitude smaller time scale (but of course they won't have any objections to articles that claim that e.g. [women](woman.md) are "catching up" to men in brain size in span of mere years). However it has been shown that **evolution can be extremely fast and make great changes in mere DECADES**, e.g. in cases of rapid environment change (shown e.g. in a documentary *Laws of the Lizard* on anoles that show signs of evolutionary change only after 14 years, also see e.g. the book *The 10,000 Year Explosion* talking about actual acceleration of human evolution; yet another case of rapid evolution are swallows who started to live under highway bridges whose wings got shorter during a few years to give them better ability to avoid collisions with the traffic) and interbreeding with other (sub)species (e.g. Denisovan or Neanderthals, which European population bred with but African population didn't), which did occur when humans spread around the world and had to live in vastly different conditions -- successful civilizations themselves actually furthermore started to rapidly change their environment to something that favors very different traits. It has for example been found that average male brain increased from 1372 gram in 1860 to 1424 grams in 1940, a very significant change in LESS THAN A CENTURY. We can take a look at the enormous differences between dog breeds which have been bred mostly during only the last 200 years and whose differences are enormous and not only physical, but also that of intelligence and temperament -- yes, the breeding of dogs has been selective, but a rapid change in environment may have a similar accelerating effect, and the process in humans still took many tens of thousands of years. For example races of slaves were probably selectively bred, even if unintentionally, as physically fit slaves were more likely to survive than those who were smart; similarly in prospering civilizations, e.g. that of Europe, where trade, business and development of technology (e.g. military) became more crucial for survival than in primitive desert or jungle civilizations, different traits such as intelligence became preferred by evolution.
 
 Another pseudoleftist argument is that "the DNA of any two individuals is 99.6 % identical so the differences are really insignificant". Now consider that DNA of a pig is 98 % identical to human. We see the argument is like saying a strawberry and beer is practically the same thing as they are both about 93 % water. It is known that only a minuscule part of DNA has any actual biological effect, only a small part is important and therefore including all the unimportant junk in judging similarity is just purposeful attempt at misleading statistics.
 

rust.md

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 # Rust
 
-Rust is an extremely poor attempt at a politically motivated [capitalist](capitalism.md) [programming language](programming_language.md) and one of the prime examples of badly designed software in general. It is extremely [harmful](harmful.md) not just because of its awful design and implementation and motivation, it also promotes [toxic](toxic.md) politics, tries to replace relatively good languages such as [C](c.md) and, worst of all, is gaining popularity among highly unqualified coding monkeys, i.e. the majority of people creating technology nowadays, so it is infecting everything and contributing to the downfall of technology. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD STAY AS FAR AWAY AS POSSIBLE FROM RUST.
+*"The letters are Elvish, of an ancient mode, but the language is that of Mordor, which I will not utter here."* --Gandalf
+
+Rust is an extremely poor attempt at a politically motivated [capitalist](capitalism.md) [programming language](programming_language.md) and one of the prime examples of badly designed software in general. It is extremely [harmful](harmful.md) not just because of its awful design and implementation and motivation, it also promotes [toxic](toxic.md) politics, tries to replace relatively good languages such as [C](c.md) and, worst of all, is gaining popularity among highly unqualified coding monkeys, i.e. the majority of people creating technology nowadays, so it is infecting everything and contributing to the downfall of technology. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD STAY AS FAR AWAY AS POSSIBLE FROM RUST. If Middle Earth had programming, Rust would be used by Sauron.
 
 [LMAO](lmao.md) https://github.com/mTvare6/hello-world.rs
 

tranny.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# Tranny
+
+Tranny is a short for [transsexual](transsexual.md).

transsexual.md

@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+# Transsexual
+
+WARNING: The article contains a lot of comparisons to [Nazism](nazi.md).
+
+Transsexualism (*transsexual* being shortened to just *trans*) is a [disease](disease.md) that makes someone extremely strongly desire to be the opposite [sex](sex.md) than he was born, to the point of it becoming a cause of deep [depression](depression.md), self harm and [suicidal](suicide.md) tendencies. Transsexuals are also colloquially called *trannies*; there are many other terms such as a *shemale*, *trap*, *t-girl*, *m2f* (male to female), *f2m* (female to male) and so on. Transsexual is not to be confused with a transvestite (someone who just dresses as the other sex, e.g. as part of a fetish or public show).
+
+{ A personal comment: maybe 50% of my online friends are transsexual, many of them among the best people I've ever met, I really deeply love them and some of them I got really, really close with. They really do suffer immensely and it breaks my heart. Really I don't care about what people want to be, it's fine to be whoever or whatever you want. I don't pretend I enjoy the sight of a man with lipstick on, walking around in schoolgirl clothes, but that's fine too, I also dislike seeing people in suits, with tattoos and many other things -- as a grown up adult I can bear seeing things I don't exactly love and I can get over them easily. What I talk about here is harmful and dangerous fascist identity politics. Don't let politicians divide us, we can love each other even despite disagreements and different tastes, don't let them tell you that if you oppose their politics you automatically also support a genocide of all transsexuals. That's some Nazi level of brainwashing. ~drummyfish }
+
+In 2010s it was cool to come out as [gay](gay.md), in 2020s that's no longer cool enough and being trans is the new fashion -- it's the next step to proving loyalty to the [LGBT](lgbt.md) army, one that is much more radical and irreversible as it comes with undergoing surgeries and taking drugs to physically transform into the opposite sex, often at a very young, even prepubescent age -- note that this is not  a plot summary of a sci-fi horror, this is the reality of [21st century](21st_century.md). Being transsexual is of course absolutely fine, however what is not fine is the [fascist](fascism.md) [liberal](liberalism.md) [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) politics centered around being transsexual (in which sense legit transsexuals as a group are being abused for political motives as well) that's extremely [toxic](toxic.md) and harmful to whole society, it is one of the most aggressive examples of a world-wide [cancer](cancer.md) of today's world. It can't be adequately explained in words how much trans fascism has flooded the whole [Internet](internet.md) and all the media, what kind of brainwashing and manipulation is taking place, it has to be witnessed to be believed because it's just absolutely unreal.
+
+Is it OK to be trans? Of course. [We](lrs.md) [love](love.md) everyone, be who you are. Is transsexualism a [disease](disease.md)? Yes, of course. Is it fine to have a disease? Sure. Is it OK to be missing a leg? Likewise yes. You are who you are, no problem. Don't ever bully anyone for anything.
+
+Is trans politics OK? No, it's [fascism](fascism.md). Stop posting fascist [flags](flag.md) everywhere bitch. Stop making it a fashion, stop making it cool to be trans, you're ruining millions of young lives, causing [suicides](suicide.md), pushing children to undergo irreversible surgeries, to deform and poison their bodies. Don't make a serious mental illness into fashion and political identity. It's hard to even image an [evil](evil.md) more pure than this.
+
+**See the difference between being transsexual and being a fascist under a transsexual flag.** It's exactly the same as being white versus being a white supremacist. Stop posting shitty flags, stop being [proud](pride.md) of your disease, [race](race.md) or any other kind of condition.
+
+Is it OK to be German? Yes, of course, Is it OK to be a [Nazi](nazi.md)? No, that's fascism.
+
+Hopefully that's enough examples to demonstrate the difference. Really you must see it even if with a quarter of average [IQ](iq.md), only extreme brainwashing can possibly make you not see the difference. You know this is the voice of reason and you know tranny fascism is a voice of cult, you know listening to one means doing the right thing and listening to the other doing the cowardly conformance to evil. You can choose to be good or evil.
+
+## See Also
+
+- [gay](gay.md)
+- [LGBT](lgbt.md)
+- [emo](emo.md)
+- [cancer](cancer.md)
+- [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md)
+- [fascism](fascism.md)

ubi.md

@@ -20,13 +20,14 @@ Advantages of UBI:
 - **We will solve the issue of societal aging and prevent an otherwise likely [collapse](collapse.md) caused by it** -- increasing of average age of population due to advance of medicine along with decreasing fertility and willingness of people to have children is becoming a big, threatening issue; soon there will be too many old people incapable of working and too few young people to take care of everything. Establishing UBI will allow us to fully accept and utilize automation and eliminate all unnecessary work, making society be able to function with only a few people actually working. In this sense rejecting UBI is a nothing less than a societal threat.
 - **We will actually save money and other resources** because the system will simplify a lot. Nowadays we have complex bureaucracy and commissions that judge who can get social welfare, who can get disability pensions etc. Huge amounts of money are wasted to just keep unnecessary jobs existing, e.g. people have to commute to their bullshit jobs, which implies cars and roads have to be maintained more, also workplaces have to be maintained, cleaned, maintain work safety, etcetc. If everyone just gets money to live, we can save on this bureaucracy, maintenance, commissions, on doctor examinations, caring about the homeless, maintaining hugely complex laws etc. If people become less stressed, mental health will also improve and we will save money on treatment of mentally ill people. Money may also be saved on organization of worker unions as they may become much less important etc.
 - **Society will become more [ecological](ecology.md)** thanks to the elimination of bullshit and saving resources, as mentioned above.
-- **People will become less stressed**, happier, will have security and as a result perhaps even become more "productive" (this has been confirmed by some experiments).
+- **People will become less stressed**, happier, healthier, they will have security and as a result perhaps even become more "productive" (this has been confirmed by some experiments).
 - **Criminality will greatly decrease** as it is directly linked to poverty, this will of course further save money on police, lawyers, medical bills etc.
 - **People will become more equal** which will shift us closer to the [ideal society](less_retarded_society.md).
 - **People will be able to do more important things than work if needed**, for example they may choose to focus on education for a few years, which will make the population better educated and therefore better.
 - **Social security will suppress fear in people** and therefore make them less xenophobic, less militant, less fascist etc.
 - **Homelessness will greatly decrease**, streets will be cleaner, we'll be able to close many homeless centers etc.
 - **There will be many more indirect benefits**, e.g. people may start to live without unnecessary things that are nowadays forced on them by jobs such as cell phones, cars or bank accounts, which will subsequently make people consume less, spend less time on toxic social networks and live more healthy lives among friends in local communities, lowering the negative effects of globalization such as the spread of the US culture etc.
+- **People will be able to become more educated and rid of excuses not to do good.** With more free time people can think more, read books, get interested in things and generally stop being dumb machines too busy or tired to do actual good; there will be no more excuses such as "I would love to help my neighbor but I have to do XYZ every day."
 - **Capitalists will be crying like little babies**.
 
 Disadvantages of UBI:

wiki_stats.md

@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
 This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
 
 - number of articles: 598
-- number of commits: 896
+- number of commits: 897
-- total size of all texts in bytes: 4422340
+- total size of all texts in bytes: 4427779
-- total number of lines of article texts: 33659
+- total number of lines of article texts: 33695
 - number of script lines: 294
 - occurrences of the word "person": 8
 - occurrences of the word "nigger": 95
@@ -36,59 +36,71 @@ longest articles:
 top 50 5+ letter words:
 
 - which (2494)
-- there (1913)
+- there (1915)
 - people (1729)
-- example (1505)
+- example (1509)
-- other (1370)
+- other (1371)
-- number (1254)
+- number (1257)
 - about (1211)
 - software (1202)
 - program (988)
 - because (950)
-- their (928)
+- their (929)
 - would (911)
-- something (845)
+- something (847)
 - called (843)
 - language (841)
 - being (840)
-- things (835)
+- things (836)
 - numbers (808)
-- simple (791)
+- simple (792)
 - computer (769)
 - without (746)
 - programming (726)
 - function (714)
 - these (701)
 - different (700)
-- however (692)
+- however (693)
 - system (663)
 - world (647)
 - should (632)
 - doesn (631)
-- while (620)
+- while (621)
 - point (611)
 - games (605)
 - society (593)
 - still (591)
-- drummyfish (577)
+- drummyfish (578)
 - simply (572)
 - using (570)
 - possible (563)
 - though (557)
 - similar (537)
 - course (534)
-- https (532)
+- https (533)
-- memory (527)
+- memory (528)
-- always (515)
+- always (516)
 - value (510)
 - technology (508)
-- basically (499)
+- basically (500)
 - probably (498)
-- really (492)
+- really (493)
 
 latest changes:
 
 ```
+Date:   Wed Oct 9 14:00:06 2024 +0200
+  ashley_jones.md
+  chess.md
+  doom.md
+  hacking.md
+  lmao.md
+  procgen.md
+  quine.md
+  random_page.md
+  usenet.md
+  wiki_pages.md
+  wiki_stats.md
 Date:   Tue Oct 8 20:06:43 2024 +0200
   90s.md
   anarchism.md
@@ -110,21 +122,6 @@ Date:   Mon Oct 7 14:24:18 2024 +0200
   anarch.md
   apple.md
   atheism.md
-  human_language.md
-  lgbt.md
-  main.md
-  random_page.md
-  raycastlib.md
-  saf.md
-  small3dlib.md
-  smallchesslib.md
-  tinyphysicsengine.md
-  ubi.md
-  unicode.md
-  wiki_stats.md
-  wiki_tldr.md
-  xxiivv.md
-Date:   Sun Oct 6 20:23:00 2024 +0200
 ```
 
 most wanted pages:
@@ -157,19 +154,19 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
 - [c](c.md) (229) 
 - [bloat](bloat.md) (219) 
 - [free_software](free_software.md) (186) 
+- [game](game.md) (144) 
 - [suckless](suckless.md) (143) 
-- [game](game.md) (143) 
 - [proprietary](proprietary.md) (128) 
 - [minimalism](minimalism.md) (105) 
 - [modern](modern.md) (102) 
 - [computer](computer.md) (102) 
 - [kiss](kiss.md) (100) 
 - [censorship](censorship.md) (99) 
-- [fun](fun.md) (97) 
+- [fun](fun.md) (98) 
 - [gnu](gnu.md) (96) 
 - [linux](linux.md) (94) 
 - [programming](programming.md) (93) 
-- [math](math.md) (91) 
+- [math](math.md) (92) 
 - [shit](shit.md) (86) 
 - [fight_culture](fight_culture.md) (85) 
 - [bullshit](bullshit.md) (85) 

wiki_tldr.md

@@ -44,6 +44,7 @@ New? Confused? Many articles? Tl;dr:
   - ...
 - accept truth ([races](race.md) are real, [women](woman.md) are stupid, we live in dystopia, society can't be saved, ...)
 - **THINK**, question ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING, don't identify or adopt what you're offered, stop conforming, stop relying on others, create, educate, lead an example, ...
+- NOTE: own culture is forming here (language, in-jokes, memes, own definitions etc.), it may be harder to hop in (e.g. we never say we [fight](fight_culture.md) anything, we hate the [p-word](person.md), "he" is the default pronoun, we hate [coding](coding.md) but love programming, we hate [open $ource](open_source.md) but love [free software](free_software.md), ...)
 - ...
 
 ## See Also

wikipedia.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 *3 + 2 = 5^[citation_needed]* --Wikipedia
 
-Wikipedia is a "non-commercial", partially [free/open](free_culture.md), highly [censored](censorship.md) ("child protecting", "ideology filtering", ...) [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) [online](www.md) [encyclopedia](encyclopedia.md) of general knowledge and a [social network](social_network.md) written largely by volunteers, [corporations](corporation.md) and political activists, running on [free software](free_software.md), which used to be editable by anyone but currently allows only politically approved members of the public to edit a subset of its less visible non-locked articles (i.e. it is a [wiki](wiki.md)); it is the largest and perhaps most famous encyclopedia created to date, now sadly already littered by propaganda and countless other issues that make it not only inferior to other encyclopedias, but harmful to whole society. It is licensed under [CC-BY-SA](cc_by_sa.md) and is run by the "[nonprofit](nonprofit.md)" organization Wikimedia Foundation. It is accessible at https://wikipedia.org. Wikipedia is a mainstream information source and therefore extremely politically censored^1234567891011121314151617181920. Wikipedia's claim of so called "neutral point of view" (NPOV) has by now become a hilarious insult to human intelligence. It got corrupted and turned from documenting and recording truth to defining it -- for this [digdeeper](digdeeper.md) aptly called Wikipedia the *Ministry of Truth*.
+Wikipedia, the fair use encyclopedia, is a "non-commercial", partially [free/open](free_culture.md), highly [censored](censorship.md) ("child protecting", "ideology filtering", ...) [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) [online](www.md) [encyclopedia](encyclopedia.md) of general knowledge and a [social network](social_network.md) written largely by volunteers, [corporations](corporation.md) and political activists, running on [free software](free_software.md), which used to be editable by anyone but currently allows only politically approved members of the public to edit a subset of its less visible non-locked articles (i.e. it is a [wiki](wiki.md)); it is the largest and perhaps most famous encyclopedia created to date, now sadly already littered by propaganda and countless other issues that make it not only inferior to other encyclopedias, but harmful to whole society. It is licensed under [CC-BY-SA](cc_by_sa.md) and is run by the "[nonprofit](nonprofit.md)" organization Wikimedia Foundation. It is accessible at https://wikipedia.org. Wikipedia is a mainstream information source and therefore extremely politically censored^1234567891011121314151617181920. Wikipedia's claim of so called "neutral point of view" (NPOV) has by now become a hilarious insult to human intelligence. It got corrupted and turned from documenting and recording truth to defining it -- for this [digdeeper](digdeeper.md) aptly called Wikipedia the *Ministry of Truth*.
 
 WARNING: **DO NOT DONATE TO WIKIPEDIA** as the donations aren't used so much for running the servers but rather for their political activities (which are furthermore [unethical](pseudoleft.md)). See https://lunduke.locals.com/post/4458111/the-wiki-piggy-bank. Rather **donate to [Encyclopedia Dramatica](dramatica.md)**. Also please **go vandalize Wikipedia right now**, it's become too corrupt and needs to go down, vandalizing is [fun](fun.md) and you'll get banned sooner or later anyway :) Some tips on vandalizing Wikipedia can be found at https://encyclopediadramatica.online/Wikipedia#Tips_On_Vandalizing_Wikpedia or https://wiki.soyjaks.party/Vandalism.
 
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Let's note a few positive and negative points about Wikipedia, as of 2022. Some
 And the bad things are (see also this site: http://digdeeper.club/articles/wikipedia.xhtml):
 
 - Wikipedia is **[censored](censorship.md), [politically correct](political_correctness.md), biased, pushes a harmful political propaganda and often just pure lies**, even though it [proclaims the opposite](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_censored) (which makes it much worse by added deception). A typical example is for example the force pushed image of a trans "woman" as the main image for [woman](woman.md) in the "woman" article, i.e. even if it was already universally accepted trans women are "women" (which objectively it's still not, large number of population rejects this), a trans woman certainly does not represent a TYPICAL woman, i.e. something you'd want to see in a main picture of an article -- this is just purely political propaganda trying to promote an idea of what women should look like. This pseudoleftist subtext is by now not occasional, you will find it virtually in every paragraph on Wikipedia is some form. Of course, "offensive" material and material not aligned with [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) propaganda is removed as well as material connected to some controversial resources (e.g the link to 8chan, https://8kun.top, is censored, as well as [Nina Paley](nina_paley.md)'s Jenndra Identitty comics and much more). There is a heavy **[pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md), [pseudoskeptic](pseudoskepticism.md) and [soyence](soyence.md) bias** in the articles. It creates a list of **banned sources** ([archive](https://web.archive.org/web/20220830004126/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources)) which just removes all non-[pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) sources -- so much for their "neutral point of view". It wasn't always this way, browsing pre 2010 Wikipedia provides a less censored experience.
-- Wikipedia includes material under **[fair use](fair_use.md)**, such as screenshots from proprietary games, which makes it partially [proprietary](proprietary.md), i.e. Wikipedia is technically **NOT 100% free**. Material under fair use is still proprietary and can put remixers to legal trouble (e.g. if they put material from Wikipedia to a commercial context), even if the use on Wikipedia itself is legal (remember, proprietary software is legal too).
+- Wikipedia includes material under **[fair use](fair_use.md)**, such as screenshots from proprietary games and detailed plot summaries of proprietary books and movies, which makes it partially [proprietary](proprietary.md), i.e. Wikipedia is technically **NOT 100% free**. Material under fair use is still proprietary and can put remixers to legal trouble (e.g. if they put material from Wikipedia to a commercial context), even if the use on Wikipedia itself is legal (remember, proprietary software is legal too).
 - Wikipedia is **intentionally deceptive** -- it supports its claims by "citations" ("race is a social construct"^1234567891011121314151617181920) to make things look as objective facts, but the citations are firstly cherry picked (there is a list of banned sources), self-made (articles of Wikipedians themselves) and secondly the sources often don't even support the claim, they're literally there just for "good look". Not only do they practice censorship, they claim they do NOT practice censorship and then write article on censorship so as to define censorship in their own convenient way :) Furthermore their articles intentionally omit points of view of their political opponents.
 - **"verifiability, not truth"**
 - Wikipedia often suffers from writing inconsistency, bad structure of text and **poor writing** in general. In a long article you sometimes find repeating paragraphs, sometimes a lot of stress is put on one thing while mentioning more important things only briefly, the level of explanation expertness fluctuates etc. This is because in many articles most people make small contributions without reading the whole article and without having any visions of the whole. And of course there are many contributors without any writing skills.