From 1ac8738538b12cfc78dc794514a6a4423f47c63a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Miloslav Ciz Date: Sun, 7 Nov 2021 20:48:27 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] Update --- programming_language.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/programming_language.md b/programming_language.md index 802b0ae..c98f627 100644 --- a/programming_language.md +++ b/programming_language.md @@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ Sometimes the distinction here may not be completely clear, for example Python i We can divide language in many more ways, for example based on their paradigm ([impertaive](imperative.md), [declarative](declarative.md), [object-oriented](oop.md), [functional](functional.md), logical, ...), purpose (general purpose, special purpose), computational strength ([turing complete](turing_complete.md) or weaker), level of abstraction (high, low), typing (strong, weak, dynamic, static) or function evaluation (strict, lazy). - ## Nice Languages *THIS IS NOT A COMPREHENSIVE LIST, I can only include languages that I am familiar with, please add more* ~drummyfish - [C](c.md): the one and only, the go-to language of the [suckless](suckless.md) community and of compiled languages in general, greatly [future-proof](future_proof.md), uncontested in performance and with nice oldschool [meme](meme.md)-free design, our beloved C +- [Scheme](scheme.md): the minimal/elegant member of [lisp](lisp.md) family of [functional](functional.md) languages - [Forth](forth.md): beautifully simple stack-based language - [Lambda calculus](lambda_calculus.md): ultra extremely [minimal](minimalism.md) [mathematical](math.md) [functional](functional.md) language - [Sigma calculus](sigma_calculus): yes or no? seems like yes