This commit is contained in:
Miloslav Ciz 2024-12-03 21:42:19 +01:00
parent bf75ed2381
commit 2bd9c6afed
20 changed files with 1899 additions and 1884 deletions

View file

@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
# 3D Model
In the world of [computers](computer.md) (above all in [computer graphics](graphics.md), but also in physics simulations, 3D printing etc.) 3D model is a representation of a [three dimensional](3d.md) object, for example of a [real life](irl.md) object such as a car, [tree](tree.md) or a [dog](dog.md), but also possibly something more abstract like a [fractal](fractal.md) or [function](function.md) plot surface. 3D models can be displayed using various [3D rendering](3d_rendering.md) techniques and are used mostly to simulate [real world](real_world.md) on computers (e.g. [games](game.md)), as real world is, as we know, three dimensional. 3D models can be created in several ways, e.g. manually with 3D modeling software (such as [Blender](blender.md)) by 3D [artists](art.md), by 3D scanning real world objects, or automatically by [procedural generation](procgen.md).
In the world of [computers](computer.md) and [programming](programming.md) (above all in [computer graphics](graphics.md), but also in physics simulations, 3D printing etc.) 3D model is a representation of a [three dimensional](3d.md) object, for example of a [real life](irl.md) object such as a car, [tree](tree.md) or a [dog](dog.md), but also possibly something more abstract like a [fractal](fractal.md) or [function](function.md) plot surface. It is [model](model.md) in [mathematical](math.md) sense, i.e. an [approximation](approximation.md) or idealization of a shape that usually exists in real world but in its infinite complexity couldn't be represented in the computer. A very common thing we'll want to do with a 3D models is to draw it on the screen -- we call this [3D rendering](3d_rendering.md) and can achieve it using various rendering techniques and [algorithms](algorithm.md), but much more can be done with 3D models: for example they're used to perform simulations of the [real world](real_world.md) (e.g. [games](game.md), architectural calculations, car crash simulations, ...), because real world is, as we know, three dimensional. 3D models can be created in various ways too, e.g. manually with 3D modeling software (such as [Blender](blender.md)) by 3D [artists](art.md), by 3D scanning real world objects, automatically using [procedural generation](procgen.md), [artificial intelligence](ai.md) etc. It is even possible to create 3D models without a computer, just with [pen and paper](pen_and_paper.md).
There is a plethora of different 3D model types, the topic is very large when viewed in its whole scope because 3D models can be used and represented in many ways (and everything is yet more complex by dealing with different methods of 3D rendering) -- the **mainstream "game" 3D models** that most people are used to seeing are polygonal (basically made of triangles) boundary-representation (recording only surface, not volume) [textured](texture.md) (with "pictures" on their surface) 3D models, but be aware that many different ways of representation are possible and in common use by the industry, for example various volume representations, [voxel](voxel.md) models, [point clouds](point_cloud.md), [implicit surfaces](implicit_surface.md), [spline](spline.md) surfaces, [constructive solid geometry](csg.md), [wireframe](wireframe.md) etc. Models may also bear additional extra information and features, e.g. material, bone rigs for animation, animation key frames, density information, [LODs](lod.md), even [scripts](scripting.md) and so on.
There is a plethora of different 3D model types, the topic is very wide spanning and volume of literature is enormous when examining it in the scope of all possible areas that 3D models are used in because 3D models can really be used and represented in many ways, each of which is a tradeoff of various attributes that have different weights in different areas and industries. Everything is yet more complex by dealing with different methods of 3D rendering that favor different representations of 3D models -- the universal, **mainstream "game" 3D models** that most people are used to seeing are polygonal (basically made of triangles) boundary-representation (recording only surface, not volume) [textured](texture.md) (with "pictures" on their surface) 3D models, but be aware that many different ways of representation are possible and in common use by the industry, for example various volume representations, [voxel](voxel.md) models, [point clouds](point_cloud.md), [implicit surfaces](implicit_surface.md), [spline](spline.md) surfaces, [constructive solid geometry](csg.md), [wireframe](wireframe.md), hybrid etc. Models may also bear additional extra information and features, e.g. material, mass, bone rigs for animation, animation key frames, density information, collision shapes, [LODs](lod.md), even [scripts](scripting.md) and so on.
**3D formats**: situation here is not as simple as it is with images or audio, but there are a few formats that in practice will suffice for most of your models. Firstly the most [KISS](kiss.md) one is (Wavefront) **obj** -- this is supported by almost every 3D software, it's a text format that's easy to parse and it's even human readable and editable; obj supports most things you will ever need like UV maps and normals, and you can [hack](hack.md) it even for a primitive keyframe animation. So if you can, use obj as your first choice. If you need something a little more advanced, use **COLLADA** (.dae extension) -- this is a bit more [bloated](bloat.md) than obj as it's an [XML](xml.md), but it's still human readable and has more features, for example skeletal animation, instancing, model hierarchy and so on. Another noteworthy format is let's say [STL](stl.md), seen a lot in 3D printing. For other than polygonal models you may have to search a bit or just represent your model in some sane way, for example heightmap is naturally saved as a grayscale image, voxel model may be saved in some dead simple text format and so on. Also be always sure to **distribute your model in universal format**, i.e. don't just share Blender's project file or anything like that, that's like sharing pictures in Photoshop format or sending someone a Word document, only retards do that -- yes, you should also share the project file if possible, but it's more important to release the model in a widely supported, [future proof](future_proof.md) and non discriminating format.
**3D formats**: situation here is not as simple as it is with images or audio, but there are a few formats that in practice will suffice for most of your models. Firstly the most [KISS](kiss.md) one is probably (wavefront) **obj** -- this is supported by almost every 3D software, it's a [text](text.md) format that's easy to parse and it's even human readable and editable; obj supports most things you will ever need like UV maps and normals, and you can [hack](hack.md) it even for a primitive keyframe animation. So if you can, use obj as your first choice. If you need something a little more advanced, use **COLLADA** (.dae extension) -- this is a bit more [bloated](bloat.md) than obj as it's an [XML](xml.md), but it's still human readable and has more features, for example skeletal animation, instancing, model hierarchy and so on. Another noteworthy format is let's say [STL](stl.md), seen a lot in 3D printing. For other than polygonal models you may have to search a bit or just represent your model in some sane way, for example a [heightmap](heightmap.md) is naturally saved as a grayscale image, voxel model may be saved in some dead simple text format and so on. Also be always sure to **distribute your model in universal format**, i.e. don't just share [Blender](blender.md)'s project file or anything like that, that's like sharing pictures in Photoshop format or sending someone a Word document, only retards do that -- yes, you should also share the project file if possible, but it's more important to release the model in a widely supported, [future proof](future_proof.md) and non discriminating format.
Let's now take a closer look at a basic classification of 3D models (we only mention the important categories, this is not an exhaustive list):

View file

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
*"Imagine no possession"* --John Lennon
Communism (from *communis* -- common, shared) is a very wide term which most generally stands for the idea that sharing and equality should be the basic values and principles of a society; as such it is a [leftist](left_right.md) idea which falls under [socialism](socialism.md) (i.e. basically focusing on people at large). There are very many branches, theories, political ideologies and schools of thought somewhat based on communism, for example [Marxism](marxism.md), [Leninism](leninism.md), [anarcho communism](ancom.md), primitive communism, Christian communism, Buddhist communism etc. -- of course, some of these are good while others are evil and only abuse the word communism as a kind of *brand* (as also happens e.g. with [anarchism](anarchism.md)). Sadly after the disastrous failure of the violent pseudocommunist revolutions of the 20th century, most people came to equate the word communism with oppressive militant regimes, however we have to stress that **communism is NOT equal to [USSR](ussr.md), Marxism-Leninism, Stalinism or any other form of pseudocommunism**, on the contrary such regimes were rather hierarchical, nonegalitarian and violent, we might even say downright [fascist](fascism.md). We ourselves embrace true communism and build our [LRS](lrs.md) and [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md) on ideas of unconditional sharing. **Yes, large communist societies have existed and worked**, for example the [Inca](inca.md) empire worked without [money](money.md) and provided FREE food, clothes, houses, health care, education and other products of collective work to everyone, according to his needs. Many other communities also work on more or less communist principles, see e.g. Jewish kibbutz, Sikhist [langar](langar.md), [free software](free_software.md), or even just most families for that matter. Of course, no one says the mentioned societies and groups are or were [ideal](less_retarded_society.md), just that the principles of communism DO work, that communism should be considered a necessary attribute of an ideal society and that ideal society is not impossible due to impossibility of communism because as we see, it is indeed possible. The color [red](red.md) is usually associated with communism and the "hammer and sickle" (U+262D) is taken as its symbol, though that's mostly associated with the evil communist regimes and so its usage by LRS supporters is probably better be avoided.
Communism (from *communis* -- common, shared) is a very wide term which most generally stands for the idea that sharing and equality should be the basic values and principles of a society; as such it is a [leftist](left_right.md) idea which falls under [socialism](socialism.md) (i.e. basically focusing on people at large). There are very many branches, theories, political ideologies and schools of thought somewhat based on communism, for example [Marxism](marxism.md), [Leninism](leninism.md), [anarcho communism](ancom.md), primitive communism, Christian communism, Buddhist communism etc. -- of course, some of these are good while others are evil and only abuse the word communism as a kind of *brand* (as also happens e.g. with [anarchism](anarchism.md)). Sadly after the disastrous failure of the violent pseudocommunist revolutions of the 20th century, most people came to equate the word communism with oppressive militant regimes, however we have to stress that **communism is NOT equal to [USSR](ussr.md), Marxism-Leninism, Stalinism or any other form of pseudocommunism**, on the contrary such regimes were rather hierarchical, nationalist, cruel, nonegalitarian and violent, we might even say downright [fascist](fascism.md). Really there is very little difference between Marxist regimes and far right regimes, the difference is essentially just in the name, and so we MUST NEVER think of communism as of what Marxism. As for [LRS](lrs.md), we embrace TRUE communism and aim to make unconditional, [selfless](selflessness.md) sharing the basis of our [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md) -- ideologically this is probably closest to [anarcho communism](ancom.md). **Yes, large communist societies have existed and worked**, for example the [Inca](inca.md) empire worked without [money](money.md) and provided FREE food, clothes, houses, health care, education and other products of collective work to everyone, according to his needs. Many other communities also work on more or less communist principles, see e.g. Jewish kibbutz, Sikhist [langar](langar.md), [free software](free_software.md), or even just most families for that matter. Of course, no one says the mentioned societies and groups are or were [ideal](less_retarded_society.md), just that the principles of communism DO work, that communism should be considered a necessary attribute of an ideal society and that ideal society is not impossible due to impossibility of communism because as we see, it is indeed possible. The color [red](red.md) is usually associated with communism and the "hammer and sickle" (U+262D) is taken as its symbol, though that's mostly associated with the evil communist regimes and so its usage by LRS supporters is probably better be avoided.
Common ideas usually associated with communism are (please keep in mind that this may differ depending on the specific flavor of communism):

View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Creative Commons
Creative Commons (CC) is the forefront [non-profit](non_profit.md) organization promoting [free culture](free_culture.md), i.e. basically relaxation of ["intellectual property"](intellectual_property.md) (such as [copyright](copyright.md)) in [art](art.md). One of the most important contributions of the organization are the widely used Creative Commons [licenses](license.md) which artists may use to make their works more legally free and even put them to the [public domain](public_domain.md).
Creative Commons (CC) is the forefront [non-profit](non_profit.md) organization promoting [free culture](free_culture.md), i.e. basically relaxation of ["intellectual property"](intellectual_property.md) (such as [copyright](copyright.md)) in [art](art.md). Inspired by [free software](free_software.md), it was established in 2001 as a reaction to increasing problems mainly with [copyright](copyright.md). One of the most important contributions of the organization are the widely used Creative Commons [licenses](license.md) which artists may use to make their works more legally free and even put them to the [public domain](public_domain.md).
Generally speaking Creative Commons brought a lot of good -- not only did it bring attention to the issues of "[intellectual property](intellectual_property.md)", it made a huge number of people and organizations actually relax or completely waive their rights on works they create. We, [LRS](lrs.md), especially appreciate the [CC0](cc0.md) public domain waiver that we prefer for our own works, like did many others, and other licenses such as CC BY-SA are still popular and better than "all rights reserved". However Creative Commons is still a big, centralized organization prone to corruption, it will most definitely suffer the same degeneration as any other organization in history, so don't get attached to it.

View file

@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ Disease is a bad state of living organism's health caused by failure of its inne
- [ADHD](adhd.md)
- [ambition](ambition.md)
- aphantasia
- "asexuality"
- [assholism](assertiveness.md)
- [audiophilia](audiophilia.md)
- [avoidant personality disorder](avpd.md) (aka ultimate minimalist disease)
@ -15,6 +17,7 @@ Disease is a bad state of living organism's health caused by failure of its inne
- citation addiction, also known as [pseudoskeptic](pseudoskepticism.md)'s disease^[1][2][3]
- [data hoarding](data_hoarding.md)
- [depression](depression.md)
- dyslexia
- [egoism](egoism.md)
- [Emacs](emacs.md)
- epilepsy [LMAO](lmao.md) imagine being so gay that bright colors make you faint
@ -34,6 +37,8 @@ Disease is a bad state of living organism's health caused by failure of its inne
- [imageboarding](imageboard.md)
- infantile behavior
- lack of [IQ](iq.md)
- lack of internal monologue
- [liberalism](liberalism.md)
- lust for [identity](identity_politics.md)
- [maximalism](maximalism.md)
- [mechanical keyboard](mechanical_keyboard.md) obsession

View file

@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Some of these conditions may e.g. further require a source code of the work to b
IMPORTANT NOTE: **[fair use](fair_use.md) (or exclusive author permission) is unacceptable in free culture!** It is an extremely common mistake, happening even among people long contributing to free culture, to think that within free culture you can use a piece of proprietary art under so called *fair use* while keeping the whole work adhering to free culture -- you cannot do this (even though e.g. [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) does this for which it actually seizes to be a completely free work). Fair use is a legal concept that allows people to use any kind of art -- even proprietary -- in some "fair" ways even without the permission of the copyright holder, i.e. for example you can likely use someone's copyrighted photograph on your website as long as you have a good justification for it (e.g. documenting a historical event with this being the only existing photo of it), if you only include a low resolution version and if you're not making money off of it -- this could be judged fair use by the court, i.e. you wouldn't be violating copyright. However a work that is to be free licensed must allow ANY use, not just fair use, i.e. it mustn't contain any part under fair use, or even under EXCLUSIVE author's permission for it to be used within that project, because such part would only limit the work to be used in the "fair use" way ONLY. While in some contexts, e.g. in hobbyist projects, such work will likely be legal, i.e. fair use, in other context, like commercial ones (which free culture MUST enable), this fair use part will suddenly seize to be fair use and the use will be illegal. Similarly if you e.g. want to use someone's music in your free culture movie, it is NOT enough to get the author's permission to use the music in your movie, the author has to give permission to EVERYONE to use it in ANY WAY, because if your movie is to be under a free license, anyone will be able to take any part out of your movie and use it in any other way. { I actually managed to get some characters out of the [SuperTuxKart](supertuxkart.md) game for this reason, there were some mascots that were used under exclusive permission, which was unacceptable and Debian maintainers sorted this out. So just for the confirmation of this fact: Debian also confirmed this. ~drummyfish }
It was in 2001 when **[Lawrence Lessig](lessig.md)**, an American lawyer who can be seen as the movement's founder, created the **[Creative Commons](creative_commons.md)**, a non-profit organization which stands among the foundations of the movement and is very much connected to it. By this time he was already educating people about the twisted intellectual property laws and had a few followers. Creative Commons would create and publish a set of [licenses](license.md) that anyone could use to release their works under much less restrictive conditions than those that lawfully arise by default. For example if someone creates a song and releases it under the [CC-BY](cc_by.md) license, he allows anyone to freely use, modify and share the song as long as proper attribution is given to him. It has to be noted that **NOT all Creative Commons licenses are free culture** (those with NC and ND conditions break the above given rules)! It is also possible to use other, non Creative Commons licenses in free culture, as long as the above given criteria are respected.
During early [90s](1990s.md) people tried to carry over the principles of free software to writing with what was called [FreeLore](freelore.md) ([source](https://shii.bibanon.org/shii.org/knows/FreeLorehtml.html)), however the biggest event came in 2001 when **[Lawrence Lessig](lessig.md)**, [American](usa.md) lawyer, now one of the best known free culture people, established **[Creative Commons](creative_commons.md)**, a non-profit organization which now stands as one of the pillars of the movement (even though of course some free culture proponents may still be critical of the organization itself, the organization doesn't equal the movement). By this time he was already educating people about the twisted intellectual property laws and had a few followers. Creative Commons would create and publish a set of [licenses](license.md) that anyone could use to release their works under much less restrictive conditions than those that lawfully arise by default. For example if someone creates a song and releases it under the [CC-BY](cc_by.md) license, he allows anyone to freely use, modify and share the song as long as proper attribution is given to him. It has to be noted that **NOT all Creative Commons licenses are free culture** (those with NC and ND conditions break the above given rules)! It is also possible to use other, non Creative Commons licenses in free culture, as long as the above given criteria are respected.
In 2004 Lessig published his **book** called Free Culture that summarized the topic as well as proposed solutions -- the book itself is shared under a Creative Commons license and can be downloaded for free (however the license is among the non-free CC licenses so the book itself is not part of free culture [lmao](lmao.md), big fail by Lessig).
@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ Free culture has become a relative success, the free Creative Commons licenses a
- [free software](free_software.md)
- [free universe](free_universe.md)
- [FreeLore](freelore.md)
- [freedom distance](freedom_distance.md)
- [copyfree](copyfree.md)
- [kopimi](kopimi.md)

View file

@ -74,4 +74,5 @@ After some years dealing with software freedom (in serious ways, making money do
- [creative commons](creative_commons.md)
- [copyfree](copyfree.md)
- [freedom distance](freedom_distance.md)
- [FreeLore](freelore.md)
- [kosher software](kosher_software.md)

View file

@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ But if anyone is allowed to do anything with the universe and so possibly incomp
## See Also
- [free body](free_body.md)
- [FreeLore](freelore.md)

View file

@ -8,17 +8,22 @@ TODO: more
From the definition it can be deduced that **freedom can almost be equated with [minimalism](minimalism.md)** and those looking for genuine freedom start following minimalism very soon. At first it may not exactly be clear why, but in fact freedom and minimalism are inevitably connected: minimalism means [needing](dependency.md) a little; needing something enslaves us by FORCING us to satisfy the need and freeing ourselves of the need gives us the extra choice: to do something or not to do it, as it is now no longer obligatory. Therefore minimalism implies more choice and so, by definition, more freedom. Minimalism is not about having little, but needing little; a minimalist won't have a car or luxury house not because he couldn't achieve to have one, but because it's pointless to do so, just as it's pointless to buy something that will never be of any use or value. In the same fashion minimalist technology offers more choice: more people can understand it, repair it, improve it; minimalist software is less demanding and so there is more choice of where it can be installed and used, it is smaller so there is more choice in how to share it (unlike big software it may be shared via floppy disk, low bandwidth connection or even on paper), and so on. It is only natural that people who seriously look for attaining mental/spiritual freedom have often resorted to [asceticism](asceticism.md), at least for a period of time (e.g. [Buddha](buddha.md)) -- this is very commonly not done with the intent of actually giving up all materialistic pleasures forevermore, but rather to let go of the [dependency](dependency.md) on the them, to know and see that one really can live without them if needed so that one becomes less afraid of losing them, which is often what internally enslaves us. It's a way for attaining minimalism. Without even realizing it we are nowadays addicted to many things (games, social media, overeating, shiny gadgets, ...) like an alcoholic is to booze; it is not necessarily bad to drink alcohol, but it is bad to be addicted to it -- to free himself the alcoholic needs to abstain from alcohol for a long period of time. Our chains are often within ourselves: for example we often don't have the freedom to say what we want to say because that might e.g. ruin our career, preventing us from enjoying our expensive addictions -- once we don't worry about this, we gain the freedom to say what we want. Once you rid yourself of fear of jail, you gain the freedom to do potentially illegal things, and so on. Additionally going through the experience of letting go of pleasures very often opens up your eyes and mind, new thoughts emerge and one reevaluates what's really important in life.
By the same reasoning we'll find that **[generalism](generalism.md) and self sufficiency** increase freedom because, once again, they decrease dependence and reliance on others, opening up more possibilities and becoming harder to enslave. If one can grow own food, he can still choose to work and buy food for money he makes, but he also has up his sleeve the option to stop working and make his own food if for example the employer starts to abuse him, force him to work more for less money etc. So just BEING self sufficient alone may force the employer to treat the employee better, seeing he HAS the card and could leave if treated badly; a specialized robot however has no other option than to accept whatever conditions the employer establishes -- he is a slave. This is why [capitalism](capitalism.md) pushes people towards specialization: specialization comes at the cost of abandoning generalism and self sufficiency, making the individual depend completely on the system, becoming slave and someone who will be very easily blackmailed -- if you don't do what the system wants, you won't get what you need to live.
**In society it is impossible to have freedom while also safely ensuring it won't be abused at the same time.** You have to choose one or the other.
**Freedom implies elimination of responsibility.** Beginners often erroneously think that freedom must come with responsibility, but investing about a minute of thinking reveals the opposite is in fact true. Responsibility implies punishment for bad decisions, even if the punishment is only internal (feeling bad about what one has done etc.) and a threat of punishment for some decision effectively removes the option, i.e. ad absurdum responsibility is like having a man pointing gun at you, saying "don't you dare do A, or else" -- you are not physically prevented from doing A, but the threat effectively makes you not be able to choose A, reducing freedom. The logic of "freedom with responsibility" therefore argues that for example people under oppressive totalitarian regimes have [freedom of speech](free_speech.md) because their mouth is not physically sewed shut to prevent them from speaking, they can really say anything they want, they just have to accept they will be executed along with their whole family if they say something bad.
NOTE: One may ask how will [LRS](lrs.md) deal with the above? If we argue for true freedom, do we argue for feeling no responsibility even for things like murder etc.? The answer is basically this: to make people not do bad things don't remove their freedom to do bad things, keep their freedom to do anything while making them want to choose to do good things.
Freedom is something promised by most (if not all) ideologies/movements/etc.; this is because without further specification the term is so wide it says very little -- the very basic thing to know is, of course, that **there is no such thing as general freedom**; one kind of freedom restricts other kinds of freedom -- for example so called freedom of market says that a rich capitalist is free to do whatever he wants, which leads to him enslaving people, killing the freedom of those people.
Freedom is something promised by most (if not all) ideologies/movements/etc.; this is because without further specification the term is so wide it says very little -- the very basic thing to know is, of course, that **there is no such thing as general freedom**; one kind of freedom restricts other kinds of freedom -- for example so called freedom of market says that a rich capitalist is free to do whatever he wants, which leads to him enslaving people, killing the freedom of those people. **Wrong understanding of freedom (present especially in the [USA](usa.md) -- also pseudofreedom -- is that of "law of the jungle**, i.e. letting everyone just follow [self interest](self_interest.md) by any means necessary -- this is just tyranny of self interest and those strong enough to enforce their self interest on the detriment of others. In such society most people can NOT do whatever they want because they're FORCED (perhaps not by law but [de facto](de_facto.md) e.g. by [fear](fear_culture.md) and physical oppression) to do the bidding of the stronger. Therefore this by definition NOT real freedom, it is the rule of the strong, no different from any other kind of dictatorship. It is what eventually results in the strongest becoming absolute ruler who starts writing down orders (which at this point will be called "[laws](law.md)") enforced by his personal army (which will be called [police](police.md), [justice](justice.md) system etc.). Real freedom means lawlessness which however MUST also be rid of self interest and principles of the jungle -- [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md). Only then will everyone be as free as possible: though it's impossible to ensure that everyone would always be able to do whatever it is he wishes to do without restricting the freedom of others, it is possible to maximize this kind of freedom, to get very close to the situation when mostly one CAN do whatever it is he wishes to do.
What kind of freedom is [LRS](lrs.md) interested in? Basically the freedom for living beings to do what makes them happy -- of course this can't be achieved 100% (if one desires to enslave others, their freedom would disappear), however we can get very close (make a [society](less_retarded_society.md) in which people don't wish to enslave others). For this goal we choose to support such freedoms as [free speech](free_speech.md), [free software](free_software.md), [free culture](free_culture.md), free love etc.
## See Also
- [free software](free_software.md)
- [free culture](free_culture.md)
- [FreeDoom](freedoom.md)
- [freedom distance](freedom_distance.md)
- [slavery](slavery.md)

View file

@ -171,11 +171,11 @@ This is a summary of some main guidelines on how an LRS supporter should behave
- **[Free](freedom.md) yourself from the system** (and generally from as many things as possible) -- similarly to how you free yourself technologically, free yourself also socially, live [frugally](minimalism.md) and minimize your expenses. Stop consuming, stop living in luxury, stop spending money for shit (gyms, sports, clothes, car, streaming services, games, cigarettes, ...), use free things that people throw away and enjoy hobbies that are cheap (programming, reading books, going for walks, playing chess, collecting [rocks](rock.md), ...). **Stop watching news** (it's just brainwashing and distraction, what's really important will get to you anyway), stop engaging in fashion, stop talking to retards and watching tiktok manipulators. You need very little to live, you don't even need internet connection; with good computing you can hack offline and only connect to the internet once in a while on some public wifi to download emails and upload your programs. **Stop using [cellphone](phone.md)** (if you need it e.g. for banking, just use it for banking and don't carry it around with you, don't make it something you need with you). **Stop watching post 2010 media**, avoid all new movies, series, music, books, they are all just propaganda by now which gives you brain cancer and makes you an NPC, isolate yourself from anything [modern](modern.md), look for the old stuff. Make yourself self sufficient, prepare for the [collapse](collapase.md). If you can live somewhere in the woods and would enjoy it, go for it.
- **Adopt [defeatism](defeatism.md) and pessimism**; [optimism](optimism.md) is a harmful opium of the people, it makes you shut your eyes before suffering of others, an optimist is susceptible to fear and allows himself to be manipulated by [fear culture](fear_culture.md), learn to be [pessimistic](pessimism.md) instead -- abandoning "winner mentality" will stop you from engaging in [fight culture](fight_culture.md) and makes you free to behave morally, it turns on your empathy and allows you to be objective in your judgment (you will no longer fear seeing the truth), you will seize to be a an inhuman robot and slave of bullshit necessary for winning the capitalist game, you'll no longer be serving [capitalism](capitalism.md).
- **Search for the [truth](truth.md)**. You won't find it easily, real truth is always censored and hidden (though often in plain sight), but you can train yourself to spot propaganda and see the red flags. You won't find truth through Google, use different sources, read old books, [encyclopedias](encyclopedia.md) and different points of view (e.g. contrast articles on [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) with those on [Infogalactic](infogalactic.md)). Learn foreign and old langages such as [Latin](latin.md) so that you can read untranslated and first hand historical accounts. **Question EVERYTHING** (absolutely everything, even this statement). Do not fall into traps such as [pseudoskepticism](pseudoskepticism.md). Train your mind to think critically, avoid [shortcut thinking](shortcut_thinking.md), question your own biased beliefs and wishes.
- **Stop bullshitting yourself, admit your weaknesses and mistakes even if you can't stop making them.** In the quest for seeing truthful image of the world it's very important to start with self and stop lying to oneself. Everyone makes mistakes, everyone is imperfect and weak in one way or another and often we are forced to stay imperfect, or simply not strong enough to stop doing something we know is bad -- trying to become better is important, but it's equally important to not get devastated by the fact that perfection can't be achieved. Normies psychologically deal with this using the following harmful pattern: *if it's bad but can't be fixed, find excuse for why it's actually good*. Often for example supporters of [free software](free_software.md) make a mental exception to allow themselves to play those old nostalgic proprietary games because in this depressing world they simply can't live without it, they need them it like a drug -- the excuse is for example "it's not really software but more like a movie or work of art so actually it's fine it's proprietary" or something similar. Now please realize everyone has guilty pleasures or harmful habits, if it's not games then it's smoking, drinking, self harm, overeating or hoarding garbage. ADMIT IT'S NOT GOOD, even if you keep doing it: this way you are not distorting truth and actually stay in better control, you may aim to limit or reduce your harmful habits in the future if it can't be done now, you keep the door open to accepting a solution that may emerge later on instead of givin in to a comfort of a lie -- or shall we say a kind of [blue pill](blue_pill.md)? Actually you'll often see abused wives think like this: the husband may be drunk beating her every day but she has no way of escaping due to taking care of children and house, so you'll hear her go to great lengths to make excuses for why he's actually "not that bad" rather than admitting she's living a nightmare, like "others have it worse, at least he doesn't gamble, he actually bought me this and this, ...".
- **Stop bullshitting yourself, admit your weaknesses and mistakes even if you can't stop making them.** In the quest for seeing truthful image of the world it's very important to start with self and stop lying to oneself. Everyone makes mistakes, everyone is imperfect and weak in one way or another and often we are forced to stay imperfect, or simply not strong enough to stop doing something we know is bad -- trying to become better is important, but it's equally important to not get devastated by the fact that perfection can't be achieved. Normies psychologically deal with this using the following harmful pattern: *if it's bad but can't be fixed, find excuse for why it's actually good*. Often for example supporters of [free software](free_software.md) make a mental exception to allow themselves to play those old nostalgic proprietary games because in this depressing world they simply can't live without it, they need them it like a drug -- the excuse is for example "it's not really software but more like a movie or work of art so actually it's fine it's proprietary" or something similar. Now please realize everyone has guilty pleasures or harmful habits, if it's not games then it's smoking, drinking, self harm, overeating or hoarding garbage. ADMIT IT'S NOT GOOD, even if you keep doing it: this way you are not distorting truth and actually stay in better control, you may aim to limit or reduce your harmful habits in the future if it can't be done now, you keep the door open to accepting a solution that may emerge later on instead of giving in to a comfort of a lie -- or shall we say a kind of [blue pill](blue_pill.md)? The following pattern is extremely common nowadays: people dislike the word [censorship](censorship.md) but they are forced to do it, so they rather try to redefine the word censorship so as to exclude what they're doing (see e.g. [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md)) -- if you HAVE TO do censorship, call it censorship, admit you're doing it, don't bullshit yourself and others. You'll often see abused wives think like this: the husband may be drunk beating her every day but she has no way of escaping due to taking care of children and house, so you'll hear her go to great lengths to make excuses for why he's actually "not that bad" rather than admitting she's living a nightmare, like "others have it worse, at least he doesn't gamble, he actually bought me this and this, ...".
- **Reject harmful things like [proprietary](proprietary.md) software, [capitalism](capitalism.md), [copyright](copyright.md), [bloat](bloat.md), [work](work.md) etc.** Use and promote the ethical equivalents, i.e. [free software](free_software.md), [free culture](free_culture.md), frugality, [anarchism](anarchism.md) etc.
- **[Don't argue with retards](cant_argue_with_idiot.md)** with the goal of convincing him or winning the argument so that you feel good (the meaning of retard here is simply someone disagreeing with LRS). It's literally wasted time/energy and it's bad for your mental health, it leads nowhere and achieves nothing but make your more suicidal than you already are. You literally can NOT convince anyone who is not open to being convinced, it is impossible, even if you have 100000 mathematical proofs, real world evidence, literature supporting you and anything you can imagine, you cannot logically convince someone who doesn't know how logic works or someone who simply emotionally isn't ready to change his mind. In 99.999999999999999% cases you can tell if it's worth to talk to someone after his first reaction -- you present an idea, such as LRS, and if he just expresses disagreement, there is no point in communicating further, by the disagreement he has taken a defensive stance and will hold it for the rest of his life now, you have to go find someone else. NO, not even if he's an "intellectual", has PhD and thirty Nobel Prizes, if he doesn't wanna see the truth, you cannot help him. As it's been said, trying to argue with an idiot is like trying to win a chess game against a pidgeon -- even if you're the world chess champion, the pidgeon will just shit on the board and think it's won. If you spot a retard, just leave -- don't try to have the last word or anything, even admit him "victory" in the argument and leave him in his world of delusion where he is the unappreciated Einstein, just do not waste an extra second on him, just leave and go do something better. { So many such idiots I have met I can't even count it -- pure stupid peasant aren't even that bad, the wost are the "above average" intelligence reddit atheists who think they're smart. I literally had such people argue like "you like games therefore competition in society is good because games are part of society therefore society equals competition". Truly I'm not sure if those bastards are just trolling me into suicide or are really so fucking dumb :D ~drummyfish }
- Similarly **avoid [toxic](toxic.md) communities**, don't argue, just leave, it's better to be alone than in bad company. Basically anything with a [COC](coc.md), language filter, SJW vibe, rainbow etc. isn't even worth checking out.
- **Be a [generalist](generalism.md), see the big picture, study the whole world, educate yourself** -- "tantum possumus quantum scimus", what we can do is given by what we know. Do not become overspecialized in the capitalist way. Sure you may become an expert at something, but not for the price of making your view of the world too narrow. You may spend most of your time studying and programming computer compilers for example, but still do (and enjoy) other things, for example reading fiction, studying religions, languages, psychology, playing [go](go.md), making music, building houses, painting, doing sports, ... Learn to enjoy to educate yourself! Education (not necessarily formal) is one of the most valuable things you can get -- no one can take it away from you, it makes you see truth more clearly and though this itself makes you more depressed, it also frees you in many ways, for example knowing languages enables you to read more books and live in more places and talk to more people and you can get a comfy job as a translator if you need money, knowing chess makes you able to entertain yourself without a computer, knowing programming enables you to write your own programs if good ones aren't available, and so on. Education makes you see through other people's lies. It is fine to be retarded, remain ignorant and just play video games all days, your value as a living being will lower that way, but you will forever remain among the retarded majority manipulated by the tides of society, even if you have good opinions and correct views, you'll stay just another retard, you won't be able to help others, you'll be paralyzed, leaving the burden and joy of helping the world on others -- just decide if that is what you want. Have you always admired that someone can play a piano? Why not learn it then? Get some cheap keyboard and make it a habit to practice playing it at least 20 minutes every other day, see how good you become in a year. Were you always bad at chemistry? Why not fix it a bit? Get some chemistry for dummies book and read it every day before sleep, you will go from absolute chemistry retard to well above average soon. You can learn about start constelations, biology, history, train card games, memorize pi digits, run half marathon, learn juggling, write your own small book etcetc. A nice life hack is to **see life as an RPG game**, see yourself as a character you are improving, by improving skills you are unlocking new abilities, enabling new options, increasing your stats -- however be very careful to not become competitive or fall victim to the ["self-improvement" cult](productivity_cult.md)! The key is to not start comparing yourself to other, or rather to not have it as a goal to be better than someone else, the goal should be just your happiness of becoming a higher level living entity that has more abilities for helping other, enjoy the universe and so on. **Learn as much as you can while you're young**, when you're older it will get much harder and sometimes near impossible to learn something well; at young age you have bonus XP in the life RPG game, make as much use of it as possible.
- **Be a [generalist](generalism.md), see the big picture, study the whole world, educate yourself** -- specialization is for insects. Do not become overspecialized in the capitalist way. Sure you may become an expert at something, but not for the price of making your view of the world too narrow. You may spend most of your time studying and programming computer compilers for example, but still do (and enjoy) other things, for example reading fiction, studying religions, languages, psychology, playing [go](go.md), making music, building houses, painting, doing sports, ... Learn to enjoy to educate yourself! Education (not necessarily formal) is one of the most valuable things you can get -- no one can take it away from you, it makes you see truth more clearly and though this itself makes you more depressed, it also frees you in many ways, for example knowing languages enables you to read more books and live in more places and talk to more people and you can get a comfy job as a translator if you need money, knowing chess makes you able to entertain yourself without a computer, knowing programming enables you to write your own programs if good ones aren't available, and so on. Education makes you see through other people's lies. It is fine to be retarded, remain ignorant and just play video games all days, your value as a living being will lower that way, but you will forever remain among the retarded majority manipulated by the tides of society, even if you have good opinions and correct views, you'll stay just another retard, you won't be able to help others, you'll be paralyzed, leaving the burden and joy of helping the world on others -- just decide if that is what you want. Have you always admired that someone can play a piano? Why not learn it then? Get some cheap keyboard and make it a habit to practice playing it at least 20 minutes every other day, see how good you become in a year. Were you always bad at chemistry? Why not fix it a bit? Get some chemistry for dummies book and read it every day before sleep, you will go from absolute chemistry retard to well above average soon. You can learn about start constelations, biology, history, train card games, memorize pi digits, run half marathon, learn juggling, write your own small book etcetc. A nice life hack is to **see life as an RPG game**, see yourself as a character you are improving, by improving skills you are unlocking new abilities, enabling new options, increasing your stats -- however be very careful to not become competitive or fall victim to the ["self-improvement" cult](productivity_cult.md)! The key is to not start comparing yourself to other, or rather to not have it as a goal to be better than someone else, the goal should be just your happiness of becoming a higher level living entity that has more abilities for helping other, enjoy the universe and so on. **Learn as much as you can while you're young**, when you're older it will get much harder and sometimes near impossible to learn something well; at young age you have bonus XP in the life RPG game, make as much use of it as possible.
- **Limit your meat consumption**. If you can, become [vegetarian](vegetarianism.md) or even [vegan](veganism.md); if you can't go as far it will still be awesome if you just reduce meat consumption to let's say once or twice per week. Purpose of this isn't physical health, it's avoiding harm to other living beings -- consider that a living being who could live a long, happy life has to die just for you to have a few slightly tastier meals. Just don't do that. If you are still worried about negative effects of vegetarianism on your health, know that eating too much meat is probably more dangerous than eating no meat, AND if you eat meat every day, you are already eating too much of it, humans aren't built for that -- until very recently meat was kind of a luxury and people ate it only on special days, so reducing your meat consumption will likely improve your health. { I personally knew two butchers who basically had to have meat in every meal, one had a heart attack before the age of 30, the other one died in his 40s. Again, we choose vegetarianism for ethical reasons, but if your argument is health, it's probably not a good argument. ~drummyfish }
- **Don't become a [tool slave](tool_slave.md).**
- **Stop just bitching around and DO SOMETHING** -- don't get this wrong, bitching around and ranting is great, this whole wiki is just one huge wall of rage bitching, however if it's all you do, it literally achieves nothing, it won't convince a single man, no one will read that shit, you are just wasting huge part of your life by being angry on the Internet. First thing you have to do is DO SOMETHING, e.g. if you promote minimalism, go and make a minimalist game, show others it works, prove (even to yourself) the thing you believe in is good, bitching about the world is only to come as a supplement to your main work -- your rants aren't there to convince anyone, your art does that, your writings are there for the people who are already convinced to help them educate themselves further. Consider this: you may spend whole life writing 100 books about how minimalism is awesome, you may examine the whole history in detail, provide mathematical proofs of everything and suggest a completely working system that could be established to solve all the problems in the world -- no one is going to read this. Literally not a single man will give a shit. On the other hand you can take a year to program a minimalist operating system, one that is 1000 times smaller than Linux and is 10 times faster and is completely public domain and basically rapes Linux in every other way, you just post that somewhere and people just can't ignore it, you put before their eyes something they can literally see is infinitely better than what was there before, you instantly get thousands of people hooked and they start creating more art like this. You just changed the world significant for the better in just one year. Note this isn't an argument for chasing popularity at all, on the contrary, your actions will likely contradict the popular and even cause a lot of hate, however realize that words are just words, there are too many words everywhere, words can lie and they never achieve anything by themselves, good is achieved and proven by actions.
@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ This is a summary of some main guidelines on how an LRS supporter should behave
- **NEVER, NEVER go into debt**: Even if you should live under a bridge, if you aren't in debt you're still good -- better than most people probably. Debt is how the system enslaves you, so never take any loans or make unplanned children you would be obliged to pay for etc., it will force you to bow to the system, take unethical jobs, forget your morals. If you're already in debt, make it number one priority to pay it off ASAP. If you're in debt that would take too long or forever to pay off, your only option is just to burn your ID and run off to the woods, the system will now see you as a free slave, someone who can be forced to labor without sleep or just killed, you can no longer rely on any help from it.
- PRO TIP: A great [heuristic](heuristic.md) for making life decisions is to **usually do the exact opposite of what the society tells you to do** -- it works because society only wants to exploit you, so it pushes you towards bad decisions. This doesn't hold always, of course, don't just blindly act in opposites (there may be "double bluffs" also..., but mostly there aren't as most people just follow direct orders), but it's a good decision helper in about 99% cases. For example if society tells you "increase your social media presence", you should really completely leave social media, if it tells you "boost your carrier", you should stop working, if it tells you "go vote", you shouldn't go vote etcetc.
- PRO TIP: **Get yourself [banned](ban.md) on toxic platforms** like [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md), [GitHub](github.md), [Steam](steam.md), [4chan](4chan.md) etcetc., it has many advantages -- you gain [freedom](freedom.md) (no longer having to care about platform you are banned on), the platform loses one user/slave (you), you stop being abused by the platform, it's also [fun](fun.md) (just find some creative way to get banned, possibly cause uprising on the platform, make mods angry and waste their time on cleaning up your mess), it will make you become more self sufficient and you help decentralize the Internet again (can't edit Wikipedia? Just make your own :-]), it will make you find better places, you may also help bring the toxic platform down (others will see the platform utilizes censorship, some may follow you in leaving...) etcetc.
**Do NOT rely on a non-profit or other organization to make the world better for you. Act yourself, NOW.** It may be cool to support an organization that does some good, sure, but any organization is only a very minor helper on YOUR personal way to making the world better. Whether it's [FSF](fsf.md), [GNU](gnu.md), [EFF](eff.md), [Creative Commons](creative_commons.md) or anything else, they are not the saviors, the world can only be changed by YOU starting to actively CREATE ART and ACT as a good living being because good society is only that in which people stop relying on such organizations and start to live independently. Doing anything else than starting to act right now is absolutely pointless, on the contrary shit like wearing "I support GNU" t-shirt and signing online petitions gives you a false sense of doing something, an excuse to do nothing and feel good about it -- that's how capitalism keeps people from acting, you consume product and feel like you're a hero. Make radical actions -- if you can't find good software, WRITE IT YOURSELF NOW, stop waiting for someone to do it for you. If you hate your life, quit your job immediately and go live in the jungle RIGHT NOW, ditch your cellphone, start building your own hut out of mud, you have to fkn do something else it's never gonna happen.
**Do NOT rely on a [non-profit](non_profit.md) or other organization to make the world better for you. Act yourself, NOW.** It may be cool to support an organization that does some good, sure, but any organization is only a very minor helper on YOUR personal way to making the world better. Whether it's [FSF](fsf.md), [GNU](gnu.md), [EFF](eff.md), [Creative Commons](creative_commons.md) or anything else, they are not the saviors, the world can only be changed by YOU starting to actively CREATE ART and ACT as a good living being because good society is only that in which people stop relying on such organizations and start to live independently. Doing anything else than starting to act right now is absolutely pointless, on the contrary shit like wearing "I support GNU" t-shirt and signing online petitions gives you a false sense of doing something, an excuse to do nothing and feel good about it -- that's how capitalism keeps people from acting, you consume product and feel like you're a hero. Make radical actions -- if you can't find good software, WRITE IT YOURSELF NOW, stop waiting for someone to do it for you. If you hate your life, quit your job immediately and go live in the jungle RIGHT NOW, ditch your cellphone, start building your own hut out of mud, you have to fkn do something else it's never gonna happen.
- **Accept [death](death.md)** -- no, don't kill yourself, just accept death will come, maybe tomorrow, maybe in one hour, for you or for anyone you love, everything you ever made will become dirt. Constantly live with thought of death and get comfortable about it, you have to be ready to die at any moment and stop being too adraid of it, then you become really [free](freedom.md). Nowadays most people have panic fear of death which is similar to e.g. having panic phobia of germs -- no one wants go get sick, but if you're so gravely scared of catching any disease, you're enslaved, crippled, your life is limited, you can't do what you'd like to do. With death it's the same: try to live but don't let death scare you so much as to limit you in what you can say or do. Take a look at men who firmly stood behind their beliefs such as [Einstein](einstein.md), Seneca or Socrates, they all accepted death when it came and took it even if they could have avoided it; they are examples of highest mental freedom. Again, do NOT fucking kill yourself, that's a bad idea, just be ready for death and don't get dreadfully scared of it, it's not far away, it is probably just behind the next corner. { Regularly watching gore videos helps with this a bit. ~drummyfish }
- **Try (almost) everything**: getting experience, even unpleasant one, is good. We won't advise you to try dangerous things so that you can't sue us, but it's not bad to have been through hardships, voluntarily or not. Firstly it helps you build the big picture view -- if you know what it's like to do hard manual work as well as suffer stressful intellectual work, if you know what it's like to feel great physical or mental pain, to be hungry, very fat or skinny, alone, popular and hated, abused and so on, you'll have more empathy, you'll know how people feel and you'll see through probaganda that paints you a distorted picture of what things are like, experience and pain make you wiser and also more loving. Don't risk your health or hurt yourself too much, but maybe don't be scared of taking a blow. Secondly this conveniently makes normies shut up because they can no longer use their favorite arguments (which are invalid but they will still use them) like "u cant citicize this if u havent tried it lolooololol!!!!!" and "loloolol have u even ever done X lol? then u cant talk about it" -- usually normie lives in a world of dichotomies like "you are either an intellectual or work manually", if you've done both his brain just freezes and he's like "ummmm but... but that cant... wait... so u say... mmmm... fuk u i have to go now".
- **If you need to rest then fucking rest**, don't be a [productivist](productivity_cult.md) pussy, take as much time as you need before you feel like doing anything, it's okay.

View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Line
Line is one of the most basic geometric shapes, it is straight, continuous, [infinitely](infinity.md) long and infinitely thin. A finite continuous part of a line is called **line segment**, though in practice we sometimes call line segments also just *lines*. In flat, non-curved geometries shortest path between any two points always lies on a line.
Line is one of the most basic geometric shapes, it is straight, continuous, [infinitely](infinity.md) long and infinitely thin. A finite continuous part of a line is called **line segment**, though in practice we sometimes call line segments also just *lines*. Considering normal, finite dimensional non-curved space/geometry without any obstacles etc., the shortest path between any two distinct points always lies on a line, which is also the only line that goes through both of these points.
Line is a one [dimensional](dimension.md) shape, i.e. any of its points can be directly identified by a single number -- the signed distance from a certain point on the line. But of course a line itself may exist in more than one dimensional spaces (just as a two dimensional sheet of paper can exist in our three dimensional space etc.).
@ -150,3 +150,5 @@ To add [antialiasing](antialiasing.md) here you wouldn't just draw one pixel at
- [curve](curve.md)
- [vector](vector.md)
- [plane](plane.md)
- [circle](circle.md)
- [shape](shape.md)

View file

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Loquendo is a (sadly [proprietary](proprietary.md)) [text-to-speech](text_to_spe
Use of synthesized voices actually has a further reaching importance: part of the magic, and of the aforementioned 4chan vibes too, is also the kind of "pseudoanonymity" achieved by the creators being hidden behind the voices and video game characters -- indeed, the authors themselves are typically not completely anonymous, you know who made the video, but the fact that everyone in the community uses the same voices and the same characters to communicate ideas and opinions mentally pushes the creator himself to the background, i.e. unlike with the mainstream way of having celebrity content creators who associate their opinions with themselves, their image, face and voice, watching loquendo videos feels more like reading a stream of anonymous posts on an image board where the sentences you read seem to be coming from fictional meme characters like Pepe or Gondola, which makes it easier to realize whether you hate (or like) the opinion itself OR if you just hate the guy who expressed it. This in [our](lrs.md) opinion is a very good way of communication that puts more emphasis on actually discussing something as opposed to masturbating one's [ego](egoism.md), while also proving that it's not necessary to sport true anonymity and [censorship](censorship.md) of one's identity.
There are several male and [female](woman.md) loquendo voices, most famous of which is probably Jorge, followed by others such as Carlos and Diego. In 2024 there was a memorable moment when the guy himself whose voice was used for Carlos made a recording of him reading some of the loquendo texts. Over time there have also evolved characters that reappear in the videos (such as Tio Gilipollas), they have their own personalities, lore background, inside jokes and so on. Besides GTA San Andreas other popular games and character appear in loquendo videos, including other GTA games, Pikachu, Sonic, and, especially in the later ones, many anime characters.
There are several male and [female](woman.md) loquendo voices, most famous of which is probably Jorge, followed by others such as Carlos and Diego. In 2024 there was a memorable moment when the guy himself whose voice was used for Carlos made a recording of him reading some of the loquendo texts. Over time there have also evolved characters that reappear in the videos (such as Tio Gilipollas and CJ Junior), they have their own personalities, lore background, inside jokes and so on. Besides GTA San Andreas other popular games and character appear in loquendo videos, including other GTA games, Pikachu, Sonic, and, especially in the later ones, many anime characters.
The loquendo culture has gone so far as to even invent a fictional Loquendo City based on ideals of [free speech](free_speech.md), with sprawling lore and detail being constantly developed (this is similar to our [freedom island](island.md)) -- for example the official currency is called loquendolar and famous local food is called Mierdaja (seems like kind of Nutella but made from [shit](shit.md)). Obviously the [history](history.md) of loquendo is now a far reaching rabbithole with subcultures and many tons of material to study if one wishes to go deeper (for example an important early event to start with might be the infamous conflict between ElAnticristo2007 and Eliluminado7), which will be yet complicated further by language and slang barriers for those who don't speak Spanish, and this article cannot possibly do this topic full justice, but for anyone willing to undertake the journey it's definitely going to be a curious experience. And it's a good excuse to finally learn a new language.

View file

@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# LRS Wiki
LRS wiki, also Less Retarded Wiki, is a [public domain](public_domain.md) ([CC0](cc0.md)) non-commercial anti[capitalist](capitalism.md) (precisely [anarcho pacifist](anpac.md)) [encyclopedia](encyclopedia.md) focused on truly good, [minimalist](minimalism.md) [technology](tech.md), mainly [computer](computer.md) [software](sw.md) -- so called [less retarded software](lrs.md) (LRS) which should serve the people at large -- while also exploring related topics such as the relationship between technology and society, promoting so called [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md). LRS wiki is a source of high quality truth and the voice of reason in the [age of lies and brainwashing](21st_century.md). The basic motivation behind LRS and its wiki is unconditional [love](love.md) of all life, and the goal of LRS is to move towards creating a truly useful, [selfless](selflessness.md) technology that maximally helps all living beings as much as possible -- it does so while at the same time developing its own [culture](culture.md), one that's much more sane and compatible with the desired goal, unlike the [toxic](toxic.md) [modern](modern.md) [fascist](fascism.md) culture of the [21st century](21st_century.md). As such the wiki rejects for example [capitalist software](capitalist_software.md) (and [capitalism](capitalism.md) itself), [bloated](bloat.md) software, [intellectual property](intellectual_property.md) laws ([copyright](copyright.md), [patents](patent.md), ...) [censorship](censorship.md), [pseudoleftism](pseudoleft.md) ([political correctness](political_correctness.md), [cancel culture](cancel_culture.md), [COC](coc.md)s ...) etc. It embraces [free as in freedom](free_software.md), simple technology, i.e. [Unix philosophy](unix_philosophy.md), [suckless](suckless.md) software, [anarcho pacifism](anpac.md), [racial realism](racial_realism.md), [free speech](free_speech.md), [veganism](veganism.md) etc. As a work promoting pure [good](good.md) in a [time](21st_century.md) of universal rule of [evil](evil.md) it is greatly controversial, misunderstood and often met with hostility. However it already gained at least a few englightened followers.
LRS wiki, also Less Retarded Wiki or LRW, is a [public domain](public_domain.md) ([CC0](cc0.md)) non-commercial anti[capitalist](capitalism.md) (precisely [anarcho pacifist](anpac.md)) [encyclopedia](encyclopedia.md) focused on truly good, [minimalist](minimalism.md) [technology](tech.md), mainly [computer](computer.md) [software](sw.md) -- so called [less retarded software](lrs.md) (LRS) which should serve the people at large -- while also exploring related topics such as the relationship between technology and society, promoting so called [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md). LRS wiki is a source of high quality truth and the voice of reason in the [age of lies and brainwashing](21st_century.md). The basic motivation behind LRS and its wiki is unconditional [love](love.md) of all life, and the goal of LRS is to move towards creating a truly useful, [selfless](selflessness.md) technology that maximally helps all living beings as much as possible -- it does so while at the same time developing its own [culture](culture.md), one that's much more sane and compatible with the desired goal, unlike the [toxic](toxic.md) [modern](modern.md) [fascist](fascism.md) culture of the [21st century](21st_century.md). As such the wiki rejects for example [capitalist software](capitalist_software.md) (and [capitalism](capitalism.md) itself), [bloated](bloat.md) software, [intellectual property](intellectual_property.md) laws ([copyright](copyright.md), [patents](patent.md), ...) [censorship](censorship.md), [pseudoleftism](pseudoleft.md) ([political correctness](political_correctness.md), [cancel culture](cancel_culture.md), [COC](coc.md)s ...) etc. It embraces [free as in freedom](free_software.md), simple technology, i.e. [Unix philosophy](unix_philosophy.md), [suckless](suckless.md) software, [anarcho pacifism](anpac.md), [racial realism](racial_realism.md), [free speech](free_speech.md), [veganism](veganism.md) etc. As a work promoting pure [good](good.md) in a [time](21st_century.md) of universal rule of [evil](evil.md) it is greatly controversial, misunderstood and often met with hostility. However it already gained at least a few englightened followers.
The wiki is not funded by anyone, it doesn't have to be funded because it's not a capitalist project and it cost literally zero [monies](money.md) to make, it is not even a non-profit, so it doesn't have to obey by any laws or suck some bureaucratic dick, it is also not affiliated with anyone, its author has no career for which he would have to fear, he has no friends, family, community or collaborators, no material desires, no fear of demonetization/demonization, bans, [cancelling](cancel_culture.md), jail or [death](death.md), so he can write truth without being limited by anything.
@ -25,9 +25,11 @@ Over time, being written solely by drummyfish without much self censorship and "
It's also possible to see the wiki as a (somewhat dirty but constantly improving) collection of drummyfish's cheatsheets, links, code snippets, [jokes](jokes.md), attempts at [ASCII art](ascii_art.md), vents etcetc. More than a digital garden it's a digital swamp, maybe someone could say it's a sort of retarded [art](art.md) that mixes together various subjects: technical, cultural, personal, objective and subjective truths, [beautiful](beauty.md) and ugly things. Others might view it as a shitpost or [meme](meme.md) taken too far. It's just its own thing.
The wiki is similar to and was inspired by similar works, for example similarity could be found with the earliest (plain HTML) versions of [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md), also perhaps [wikiwikiweb](wikiwikiweb.md), [Jargon file](jargon_file.md) etc. In tone and political incorrectness it is more like [Encyclopedia Dramatica](dramatica.md), but unlike Dramatica LRS is a "serious" project, albeit with humor and [jokes](jokes.md) here and there.
The wiki is similar to and was inspired by similar works, for example similarity could be found with the earliest (plain [HTML](html.md)) versions of [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md), also perhaps [wikiwikiweb](wikiwikiweb.md), [Jargon file](jargon_file.md) etc. In tone and political incorrectness it is more like [Encyclopedia Dramatica](dramatica.md), but unlike Dramatica LRS is a "serious" project, albeit with humor and [jokes](jokes.md) here and there.
**Technology "powering" LRS wiki** is plain and simple, it uses no frameworks or static site generators, the wiki is currently written as a collection of [Markdown](markdown.md) files that use a few [shell scripts](shell_script.md) that convert the whole thing to [HTML](html.md) for the web (and can also produce txt and pdf version), i.e. it doesn't use any wiki engine or bloated static site generators.
{ I also discovered later on that there used to exist similar projects in the past, e.g. https://shii.bibanon.org/shii.org/knows/Everything_Shii_Knows.html. ~drummyfish }
**Technology "powering" LRS wiki** is plain and [simple](kiss.md), it uses no [frameworks](framework.md) or static site generators, the wiki is currently written as a collection of [Markdown](markdown.md) files that use a few [shell scripts](shell_script.md) that convert the whole thing to [HTML](html.md) for the web (and can also produce txt and pdf version), i.e. it doesn't use any wiki engine or bloated static site generators.
## See Also

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

View file

@ -45,6 +45,8 @@ Your TV is forced to show you the word when Niger plays [football](football.md)
Curiously domains of form *nigger.X* exist, for example as of writing this *nigger.org* exist and has some cool offensive message on its web :D Sadly there in no *.nigger* top level domain tho.
On brainwashing platforms the word *nigger* is usually just downright filtered out automatically, so people started using alternative forms such as *nibba* or *reggin* (the word backwards), but surely enough these are soon banned as well. A way around this is to find words that actually mean something else, such as [niger](niger.md) or nikker -- if they ban you for naming your character *Nikker*, you may argue you're from Malta and the word nikker actually means "to slow down" and in turn you may accuse them of racism and discriminating against your minority language (don't forget to threaten legal action).
In the [gender studies](gender_studies.md) circles there is an academic debate about whether the word *nigger* is in fact allowed to be used by black people, i.e. niggers themselves -- if so, anyone could use the word *nigger* as long as he mentally identifies as one because according to the latest [peer censored](peer_censorship.md) research about official truth [race](race.md) also isn't at all based in anything physical (like gender or age for example), it's purely an identity anyone can adopt mentally and things like his skin color and [IQ](iq.md) change automatically based on that (see e.g. [Michal Jackson](michael_jackson.md)).
## See Also

View file

@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ The "race is a social construct" argument is perhaps the absolutely most cretino
**What races are there?** That depends on definitions^([according to who?][according to logic]), the boundaries between races are [fuzzy](fuzzy.md) and the lines can be drawn differently. The traditional, most general division still found in the greatest 1990s encyclopedias is to three large groups: **Caucasoid** (white), **Negroid** (black) and **Mongoloid** (yellow). These can be further subdivided. Some go as far as calling different nations separate races (e.g. the Norwegian race, Russian race etc.), thought that may be a bit of a stretch. One of the first scientific divisions of people into races was done by Francois Bernier in *New Division of the Earth by the Different Species or "Races" of Man that Inhabit It* into Europeans, Asians, Africans and Sami (north Europe), based on skin color, hair color, height and shape of face, nose and eyes.
There is a controversial 1994 book called *The Bell Curve* that deals with differences in intelligence between races (later followed by other books such as *The Global Bell Curve* trying to examine the situation world-wide). [SJWs](sjw.md) indeed tried to attack it, however international experts on intelligence agree the book is correct in saying average intelligence between races differs (see e.g. [The Wall Street Journal's Mainstream Science on Intelligence](https://web.archive.org/web/20120716184838/http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/taboos/wsj_main.html)). Online resources with a lot of information on racial differences are e.g. https://zerocontradictions.net/FAQs/race-FAQs and http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/, https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Race_and_morphology etc. Note that even if some particular resource may be fascist, biased and contain propaganda of its own, it may likely give you information the pseudoleftist mainstream such as [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) and [Google](google.md) simply [censor](censorship.md) -- while we may of course not approve of the politics/opinions/goals/etc. of some we link to, we still link to them to provide access to censored information so that one can seek truth and form his own opinions.
There is a controversial 1994 book called *The Bell Curve* that deals with differences in intelligence between races (later followed by other books such as *The Global Bell Curve* trying to examine the situation world-wide). [SJWs](sjw.md) indeed tried to attack it, however international experts on intelligence agree the book is correct in saying average intelligence between races differs (see e.g. [The Wall Street Journal's Mainstream Science on Intelligence](https://web.archive.org/web/20120716184838/http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/taboos/wsj_main.html)). Online resources with a lot of information on racial differences are e.g. https://zerocontradictions.net/FAQs/race-FAQs and http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/, https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Race_and_morphology, https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Arguments_regarding_the_existence_of_races etc. Note that even if some particular resource may be fascist, biased and contain propaganda of its own, it may likely give you information the pseudoleftist mainstream such as [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) and [Google](google.md) simply [censor](censorship.md) -- while we may of course not approve of the politics/opinions/goals/etc. of some we link to, we still link to them to provide access to censored information so that one can seek truth and form his own opinions.
**If you want a relatively objective view on races, read old (pre 1950) books.** In the past people weren't yet brainwashed in this area, truth could be spoken clearly, everyone knew races existed and that acknowledging this doesn't at all imply [racism](racism.md) -- even such personalities as H. G. Wells who in his *Short History of the World* draws a nice, detailed tree of human races, alongside which he also warns against adopting (real) racism. Also see for example the article on *NEGRO* in 11th edition of Encyclopedia Britannica (1911), which clearly states on page 344 of the 19th volume that "mentally the negro is inferior to the white" and continues to cite thorough study of this, finding that black children were quite intelligent but with adulthood the intellect always went down, however it states that negro has e.g. better sense of vision and hearing. Even in the 90s still the uncensored information on race was still available in the mainstream sources, e.g. the 1995 *Desk Reference Encyclopedia* and 1993 *Columbia Encyclopedia* still have articles on races and their differences. Other books on races (which you can find e.g. on the Internet Archive) include e.g. *Race Differences* (1935, Klineberg) and *Races of Man* (a huge book from 1900, by Deniker).

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load diff

View file

@ -15,12 +15,12 @@ There are also many activists promoting euthanasia for people to whom medicine c
For SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS: these are some highly scientifically researched methods of suicide for creating bleeding edge (no pun intended) scientifically peer reviewed scientific papers for scientifically PREVENTING suicides ([LMAO](lmao.md)): { Again, please don't kill yourself if you don't have to :-) <3 ~drummyfish }
- **legal [euthanasia](euthanasia.md)** = best if available. This is just a no brainer: if one has the option to leave peacefully under the assistance of a medical professional, why choose anything else?
- **wrist cutting** (and heart stabbing etc.) = attention whoring, very low chance of success. It is known that cutting one's wrists rarely leads to death, it's almost impossible to cut very deep even if you want to, the body is just programmed to not let itself do it and especially feminine [zoomers](zoomer.md) nowadays don't have any balls to do it, one will just create a bloody mess. Self stabbing oneself to death is seen sometimes but many times it's under the influence of drugs or extremely serious mental illness which just turns off all self preservation instincts. To bleed out it's not enough to cut a vein, one must hit the artery. The correct way to cut a wrist is in the direction ALONG the wrist, NOT in perpendicular direction -- the cuts must be extremely deep to be dangerous, however the best way is to target the artery on the neck or in groin. Even so actually dying with this kind of suicide is very rare -- one paper gave a success rate of 4%.
- **wrist cutting** (and heart stabbing etc.) = attention whoring, very low chance of success. It is known that cutting one's wrists rarely leads to death, it's almost impossible to cut very deep even if you want to, the body is just programmed to not let itself do it and especially feminine [zoomers](zoomer.md) nowadays don't have any balls to do it, one will just create a bloody mess. Self stabbing oneself to death is seen sometimes but many times it's under the influence of drugs or extremely serious mental illness which just turns off all self preservation instincts. To bleed out it's not enough to cut a vein, one must hit the artery. The correct way to cut a wrist is in the direction ALONG the wrist, NOT in perpendicular direction -- the cuts must be extremely deep to be dangerous, however the best way is to target the artery on the neck or in groin. People often do it in hot bath as that increases blood flow and is also kind of less messy and possibly more comfortable (if that can even be said about the moment in which one is dying). Using ordinary knife won't work, it's never sharp enough, one has to use razor, but a small razor is hard to manipulate, so razor knife is ideal. Even so actually dying from cutting/stabbing oneself is very rare -- one paper gave a success rate of 4%.
- **setting oneself on fire** = extremely painful, slow, potentially unreliable method with the only advantage being getting attention; hence it is often used for political protests (see e.g. [Palach](palach.md)). Not succeeding means spending the rest of one's life badly deformed, experiencing horrible pain every day.
- **jumping from (VERY big) height** = reliable (if done well), quick and painless serious attempt accessible to everyone. If a man truly wishes to die reliably, he will jump from a very, VERY big height -- the biggest skyscraper or bridge he can find, at least 10 stories or so (4 stories has 50% survival rate, 7 stories only 10%). He will ideally jump head first without looking down and contemplating the choice for too long (being slightly drunk may prevent backing out, but it may also increase the chance of actually deciding against the idea, so who knows) AND, importantly, trying to minimize the chance of hurting someone else down below (e.g. by choosing an area where few people walk). People that survived such attempts said the few seconds of flight were the most frightening experience of their life, one immediately regrets the jump, therefore closing one's eyes may be good. Success rate given by sources wasn't so big numerically -- some 60% -- but it's likely driven down by people who choose small heights, which is probably the only way one can fuck this method up. Having great height basically guarantees quick death without anything that could go wrong.
- **jumping in front of a train** = good choice if done right and one's will is strong, but can be risky. Some say it's safer to put one's head on the rails and get decapitated. In any case doing so in or near the train station is a very bad idea: slow train is a bad guarantee of success. It's important to choose a very fast train and go all in, backing away in last second may result in horrible injury or extremely slow death (check out gore sites, people split in half can be seen to live excruciatingly long). The train operator will be scarred for life, there may be better ways to leave. Success rate is around 78%.
- **jumping in front of a train** = good choice if done right and one's will is strong, but can be risky. Some say it's safer to put one's head on the rails and get decapitated. In any case doing so in or near the train station is a very bad idea: slow train is a bad guarantee of success. It's important to choose a very fast train and go all in, backing away in last second may result in horrible injury or extremely slow death (check out gore sites, people split in half can be seen to live excruciatingly long). One must not walk on the tracks for a long time, waiting for the train, because nowadays there are cameras everywhere and there's a chance (low but still) you'll get spotted, reported and the incoming train will start braking -- hence people usually do this at night, they hide in a bush near the track and only jump in at the last moment. The train operator will be scarred for life, there may be better ways to leave. Success rate is around 78%.
- **shooting oneself with a gun** = serious attempt (biggest success rate), but must be done well, may not be so accessible, may fail with shaky hand. Outside of [USA](usa.md) it may be hard to get a gun, especially for people with mental illness, but people have found a way around: going to the shooting range and borrowing a gun for target practice, then quickly shooting oneself. Despite relative high success rate -- 90% according to some sources -- still a surprising number of people survive shooting themselves to the head with a pistol, and they often end up living with horrible consequence, blinding themselves etc. Shotgun is much, MUCH more reliable -- basically a guaranteed success. Some choose to combine this with a fail safe, e.g. poisoning oneself beforehand (e.g. [Hitler](hitler.md)) or standing on the edge of a high building.
- **drug overdose/poisoning** = risky unreliable way, potentially painful, may be attention whoring. Success rate is similar to that of cutting -- very low, around 4% maybe. There is a high risk of being discovered because dying takes long. Results depends on the specific drug, dosage, luck and each individual, it may be very slow, completely ineffective, induce extreme pain AND/OR irreversible damage to liver etc. Poisoning may last for many DAYS before death comes, and it certainly isn't a pleasant time. The word goes that one must NOT swallow all pills at once (which will just result in a vomit), but slowly take them one by one over the course of some time. Some also drink a lot of strong alcohol on top, but this may increase probability of vomiting it all out. Some drugs commonly used or talked about (which doesn't mean they're a good choice) include paracetamol, aspirin, cyanide, sleeping pills, rat poison, bleach, digitalis, colchicine etc.
- **drug overdose/poisoning** = risky unreliable way, potentially painful, may be attention whoring. Success rate is similar to that of cutting -- very low, around 4% maybe. There is a high risk of being discovered because dying takes long. Results depends on the specific drug, dosage, luck and each individual, it may be very slow, completely ineffective, induce extreme pain AND/OR irreversible damage to liver etc. Poisoning may last for many DAYS before death comes, and it certainly isn't a pleasant time. The word goes that one must NOT swallow all pills at once (which will just result in a vomit), but slowly take them one by one over the course of some time. Mixing it with a bit of food (e.g. yogurt) can make it more bearable to eat so many pills (some taste very bad). Some also drink alcohol on top as that should increase the drug effect, but again, too much may increase probability of vomiting it all out. Some drugs commonly used or talked about (which doesn't mean they're a good choice) include paracetamol, aspirin, cyanide, sleeping pills, painkillers, rat poison, xanax, bleach, digitalis, colchicine, heroin, cocaine, paracetamol etc. Even hhhhhhhhhplain water can cause poisoning and death, but one must drink A LOT of it.
- **hanging** = quite reliable and accessible but slow and painful method, nevertheless very popular. This is often chosen by people who have their freedom restricted, such as prisoners (one doesn't actually have to hang from the ceiling, a door handle is enough). One paper gave success probability of 84% -- again, a risk of failure is considerable and failing will likely result in serious brain damage. Risks include rope snapping or discovery. Even professional executions by hanging are infamously messy -- very precise calculations have to be made to ensure that the rope doesn't snap and the neck breaks quickly to prevent slow suffocation, however suffocation is what usually happens in hanging suicides -- this is painful and scary.
- **drowning** = [WTF](wtf.md). Slow, scary, cold, hard to execute and excruciating painful death. Success probability is relatively high though: around 80%.
- **starving to death** = very slow but apparently some do it, often as a protest.
@ -34,6 +34,8 @@ For SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS: these are some highly scientifically researched meth
- **explosion** = not very accessible but probably cool if you can pull it off somehow. Again, a huge explosion must be created else survival is possible. Then it's probably quick and painless.
- ...
See also http://edramatica.com/Suicide#How_to_Off_Yourself, they have some very funny and creative suggestions for a suicide lol.
## See Also
- [ACK](ack.md)

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

View file

@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
- number of articles: 608
- number of commits: 933
- total size of all texts in bytes: 4694630
- total number of lines of article texts: 34917
- number of commits: 934
- total size of all texts in bytes: 4707638
- total number of lines of article texts: 34948
- number of script lines: 294
- occurrences of the word "person": 9
- occurrences of the word "nigger": 101
@ -35,60 +35,70 @@ longest articles:
top 50 5+ letter words:
- which (2597)
- there (2025)
- people (1898)
- example (1595)
- other (1474)
- about (1307)
- number (1281)
- which (2605)
- there (2033)
- people (1911)
- example (1596)
- other (1477)
- about (1308)
- number (1282)
- software (1223)
- because (1029)
- because (1031)
- program (1021)
- their (1003)
- would (969)
- being (927)
- something (922)
- their (1007)
- would (970)
- being (934)
- something (924)
- things (905)
- language (904)
- called (880)
- language (905)
- called (882)
- simple (812)
- numbers (812)
- computer (811)
- without (793)
- without (796)
- programming (748)
- however (742)
- different (739)
- these (724)
- however (745)
- different (738)
- these (726)
- function (722)
- world (710)
- world (711)
- system (682)
- doesn (668)
- doesn (671)
- should (661)
- still (649)
- games (647)
- still (646)
- while (642)
- point (629)
- drummyfish (620)
- drummyfish (621)
- society (615)
- simply (613)
- possible (596)
- possible (597)
- using (590)
- though (563)
- always (561)
- https (560)
- course (558)
- probably (557)
- similar (552)
- basically (549)
- though (564)
- always (563)
- https (562)
- probably (560)
- course (560)
- similar (553)
- basically (551)
- memory (535)
- really (532)
- really (531)
- actually (529)
- technology (525)
- value (522)
latest changes:
```
Date: Mon Dec 2 20:38:04 2024 +0100
censorship.md
hitler.md
loquendo.md
main.md
random_page.md
stereotype.md
suicide.md
wiki_pages.md
wiki_stats.md
Date: Sat Nov 30 16:57:38 2024 +0100
anarch.md
bytebeat.md
@ -112,29 +122,13 @@ Date: Sat Nov 30 16:57:38 2024 +0100
wiki_stats.md
woman.md
Date: Tue Nov 26 14:13:37 2024 +0100
body_shaming.md
bullshit.md
c_tutorial.md
cache.md
capitalism.md
cheating.md
chess.md
geek.md
how_to.md
human_language.md
jokes.md
main.md
needed.md
random_page.md
shitword.md
stereotype.md
```
most wanted pages:
- [data_type](data_type.md) (14)
- [meme](meme.md) (13)
- [embedded](embedded.md) (13)
- [meme](meme.md) (12)
- [irl](irl.md) (12)
- [complex_number](complex_number.md) (11)
- [cli](cli.md) (11)
@ -155,7 +149,7 @@ most wanted pages:
most popular and lonely pages:
- [lrs](lrs.md) (321)
- [lrs](lrs.md) (322)
- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (272)
- [c](c.md) (233)
- [bloat](bloat.md) (225)
@ -164,25 +158,25 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
- [game](game.md) (145)
- [proprietary](proprietary.md) (131)
- [minimalism](minimalism.md) (112)
- [censorship](censorship.md) (108)
- [modern](modern.md) (107)
- [computer](computer.md) (107)
- [censorship](censorship.md) (107)
- [fun](fun.md) (103)
- [kiss](kiss.md) (102)
- [math](math.md) (99)
- [programming](programming.md) (98)
- [gnu](gnu.md) (96)
- [linux](linux.md) (95)
- [shit](shit.md) (93)
- [shit](shit.md) (94)
- [fight_culture](fight_culture.md) (92)
- [bullshit](bullshit.md) (90)
- [woman](woman.md) (88)
- [hacking](hacking.md) (88)
- [woman](woman.md) (86)
- [corporation](corporation.md) (86)
- [less_retarded_society](less_retarded_society.md) (84)
- [free_culture](free_culture.md) (84)
- [art](art.md) (84)
- [public_domain](public_domain.md) (83)
- [art](art.md) (83)
- [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md) (82)
- [chess](chess.md) (82)
- ...

View file

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
A woman (also girl, gril, gurl, femoid, toilet, wimminz, the weaker sex, the dumber sex or succubus; [tranny](tranny.md) girl being called [t-girl](tgirl.md), troon, [trap](trap.md), [femboy](femboy.md), fake girl or [mtf](mtf.md)) is one of two genders ([sexes](sex.md)) of [humans](human.md), the other one being [man](man.md) -- traditionally woman is defined as that who was born with a vagina. Women are the weaker sex, they are [cute](cute.md) (sometimes) but notoriously bad at [programming](programming.md), [math](math.md) and [technology](technology.md): in the field they usually "work" on [bullshit](bullshit.md) (and mostly [harmful](harmful.md)) positions such as "diversity department", [marketing](marketing.md), "[HR](human_resources.md)", [UI](ui.md)/[user experience](ux.md), or as a [token](token.md) girl for media. If they get close to actual technology, their highest "skills" are mostly limited to casual "[coding](coding.md)" (which itself is a below-average form of [programming](programming.md)) in a baby language such as [Python](python.md), [Javascript](javascript.md) or [Rust](rust.md). Mostly they are just hired for quotas and make coffee for men who do the real work (until TV cameras appear). Don't let yourself be fooled by the propaganda, women have always been bad with tech -- whenever you see a woman "engineer", quickly go hide somewhere, something's gonna fall on your head. If you see a woman driver in a bus, rather wait for the next one. Indeed, very rarely a somewhat skilled woman may appear (we're not saying women can't be capable, just that they rarely are).
The symbol for woman is a circle with cross at its bottom ([Unicode](unicode.md) U+2640). Women mostly like pink [color](color.md) and similar colors like red and purple.
The symbol for woman is a circle with cross at its bottom ([Unicode](unicode.md) U+2640). Women mostly like pink [color](color.md) and similar colors like red and purple. Watch out! Bitches carry around pepper sprays and sometimes even miniature guns, if you make eye contact for too long you're dead.
{ I would like to say there are a few women and girls I hold dear, whom I admire and who are in many aspects much better beings than myself and most men I known. ~drummyfish }