drummyfish/less_retarded_wiki
5
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Update

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Miloslav Ciz 2025-01-14 12:53:31 +01:00
parent 884594926a
commit 2efc415ac4
19 changed files with 1966 additions and 1898 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
faq.md
View file

@ -167,6 +167,12 @@ LRS only opposes SOCIAL [competition](competition.md): we say competition as a m
Same answer as in previous question: anonymity (i.e. secrecy, censorship etc.) must not be a mechanism on which our society relies, it's a harmful mechanism in this context, good society must be open, uncensored, compatible with truth, with free speech, without fear of talking, without the need for censorship etc., BUT the concept of anonymity is not bad in itself -- once again, it may be fine as a part of a voluntary social game, which image boards are. Many card games are based on hiding one's cards from other players, we do NOT want to reject these games simply because they are based on the mechanism of secrecy, we merely argue that secrecy is a bad pillar of society.
### Since you are against privacy, will you give me your password?
I hope to be able to share my password one day, sadly I haven't achieved perfection yet and can't share my main password at this point, although I have shared my weaker passwords with some people already, but eventually I'd love to live keeping zero things secret. For now you can find many things about me through my website, including detailed photographs of my naked body from all sides, my medical info, real name, birth date and place, family tree, my income and so on.
Note that me opposing privacy doesn't mean I don't acknoledge that in current dystopia there exist dangers in sharing private information, I merely argue that firstly many of the worries are exagerrated due to [fear culture](fear_culture.md) AND, mainly, that focusing on increasing privacy is a bad thing in the long term.
### How is this different from [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md)?
In many ways. Our wiki is better e.g. by being more [free](free_culture.md) (completely [public domain](public_domain.md), no [fair use](fair_use.md) [proprietary](proprietary.md) images etc.), less [bloated](bloat.md), better accessible, not infected by [pseudoleftist](psedoleft.md) [fascism](fascism.md) and censorship (we only censor absolutely necessary things, e.g. copyrighted things or things that would immediately put us in jail, though we still say many things that may get us in jail), we have articles that are better readable etc.