Update
This commit is contained in:
parent
e931e47a1f
commit
55d3362bb2
7 changed files with 25 additions and 16 deletions
|
@ -5,9 +5,9 @@ Aliasing is a certain mostly undesirable phenomenon that distorts signals (such
|
|||
A simple example showing how sampling at discrete points can quite dramatically alter the recorded result:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
' ' ' '.'- - . | .--. ''''' |
|
||||
' ' ' '.|- - . | .--. ''''| |
|
||||
. ' | '|. .' '. | |
|
||||
-|- - -O+ - -O- - ' | O O | ----+---'
|
||||
.|- - -O+ - -O- - ' | O O | .---+---'
|
||||
|| \|_ _ / | | \__/ | | |
|
||||
| ' . | _ _ _._' '. .' | |____
|
||||
' ' ' ' ''''
|
||||
|
|
8
chess.md
8
chess.md
|
@ -21,6 +21,10 @@ Chess as a game is not and cannot be copyrighted, but **can chess games (moves p
|
|||
|
||||
Chess evolved from ancient board games in India in about 6th century. Nowadays the game is internationally governed by **FIDE** which has taken the on role of an authority that defines the official rules: FIDE rules are considered to be the standard chess rules. FIDE also organizes tournaments, promotes the game and keeps a list of registered players whose performance it rates with so called Elo system – based on the performance it also grants titles such as **Grandmaster** (GM, strongest), **Internation Master** (IM, second strongest) or **Candidate Master** (CM).
|
||||
|
||||
A single game of chess is seen as consisting of three stages: **opening** (starting, theoretical "book" moves, developing pieces), **middlegame** (seen as the pure core of the game) and **endgame** (ending in which only relatively few pieces remain on the board). There is no clear border between these stages and they are sometimes defined differently, however each stage plays a bit differently and may require different skills and strategies; for example in the endgame king becomes an active piece while in the opening and middlegame he tries to stay hidden and safe.
|
||||
|
||||
The study of chess openings is called **opening theory** or just *theory*. Playing the opening stage is special by being based on memorization of this theory, i.e. hundreds or even thousands of existing opening lines that have been studied and analyzed by computers, rather than by performing mental calculation (logical "thinking ahead" present in middlegame and endgame). Some see this as weakness of chess that makes players spend extreme energy on pure memorization. One of the best and most famous players, Bobby Fisher, was of this opinion and has created a chess variant with randomized starting position that prevents such memorization, so called *chess 960*.
|
||||
|
||||
**[Elo](elo.md) rating** is a mathematical system of numerically rating the performance of players (it is used in many sports, not just chess). Given two players with Elo rating it is possible to compute the probability of the game's outcome (e.g. white has 70% chance of winning etc.). The FIDE set the parameters so that the rating is roughly this: < 1000: beginner, 1000-2000: intermediate, 2000-3000: master. More advanced systems have also been created, namely the Glicko system.
|
||||
|
||||
The rules of chess are quite simple ([easy to learn, hard to master](easy_to_learn_hard_to_master.md)) and can be found anywhere on the Internet. In short, the game is played on a 8x8 board by two players: one with **white** pieces, one with **black**. Each piece has a way of moving and capturing (eliminating) enemy pieces, for example bishops move diagonally while pawns move one square forward and take diagonally. The goal is to **checkmate** the opponent's king, i.e. make the king attacked by a piece while giving him no way to escape this attack. There are also lesser known rules that noobs often miss and ignore, e.g. so called en-passant or the 50 move rule that declares a draw if there has been no significant move for 50 moves.
|
||||
|
@ -31,6 +35,10 @@ Currently the best player in the world is pretty clearly Magnus Carlsen from Nor
|
|||
|
||||
During [covid](covid.md) chess has experienced a small boom among normies and [YouTube](youtube.md) chess channels have gained considerable popularity. This gave rise to [memes](meme.md) such as the bong cloud opening popularized by a top player and streamer Hikaru Nakamura; the bong cloud is an intentionally shitty opening that's supposed to taunt the opponent (it's been even played in serious tournaments lol).
|
||||
|
||||
**White is generally seen as having a slight advantage** because he always has the first move. This doesn't play such as big role in beginner and intermediate games but starts to become apparent in master games. How big the advantages is is a matter of ongoing debate, most people are of the opinion there exists a slight advantage, some people think chess is a win for white with perfect play while others believe chess is a draw with perfect play. Probably only very tiny minority of people think white doesn't have any advantage.
|
||||
|
||||
On **perfect play**: as stated, chess is unlikely to be ever solved so it is unknown if chess is a theoretical forced draw or forced win for white (or even win for black), however many simplified endgames and some simpler chess variants have already been solved. Even if chess was ever solved, it is important to realize one thing: **perfect play may be unsuitable for humans** and so even if chess was ever solved, it might have no significant effect on the game played by humans. Imagine the following: we have a chess position in which we are deciding between move *A* and move *B*. We know that playing *A* leads to a very good position in which white has great advantage and easy play (many obvious good moves), however if black plays perfectly he can secure a draw here. We also know that if we play *B* and then play perfectly for the next 100 moves, we will win with mathematical certainty, but if we make just one incorrect move during those 100 moves, we will get to a decisively losing position. While computer will play move *B* here because it is sure it can play perfectly, it is probably better to play *A* for human because human is very likely to make mistakes (even a master). For this reason humans may willingly choose to play mathematically worse moves -- it is because a slightly worse move may lead to a safer and more comfortable play for a human.
|
||||
|
||||
## Chess And Computers
|
||||
|
||||
{[This](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DpXy041BIlA) is an absolutely amazing video about weird chess algorithms :) ~drummyfish}
|
||||
|
|
2
fork.md
2
fork.md
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
# Fork
|
||||
|
||||
Fork is a branch that splits from the main branch of a project and continues to develop in a different direction as a separate version of that project, possibly becoming a completely new one. This may happen with any "intellectual work" or idea such as [software](software.md), movement, theory, literary universe or, for example, a [database](database.md). Forks may later be *merged* back into the original project or continue and diverge far away, forks of different projects may also combine into a single project as well.
|
||||
Fork is a branch that splits from the main branch of a project and continues to develop in a different direction as a separate version of that project, possibly becoming a completely new one. This may happen with any "intellectual work" or idea such as [software](software.md), movement, theory, literary universe, religion or, for example, a [database](database.md). Forks may later be *merged* back into the original project or continue and diverge far away, forks of different projects may also combine into a single project as well.
|
||||
|
||||
For example the [Android](android.md) [operating system](os.md) and [Linux-libre](linux_libre.md) [kernel](kernel.md) have both been forked from [Linux](linux.md). [Linux distributions](distro.md) highly utilize forking, e.g. [Devuan](devuan.md) or [Ubuntu](ubuntu.md) and [Mint](mint.md) are forked from [Debian](debian.md). [Free software movement](free_software.md) was forked into [open source](open_source.md), [free culture](free_culture.md) and [suckless](suckless.md), and suckless was more or less forked into [LRS](lrs.md). [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) also has forks such as [Metapedia](metapedia.md). [Memes](meme.md) evolve a lot on the basis of forking.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
10
graphics.md
10
graphics.md
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
# Computer Graphics
|
||||
|
||||
Computer graphics (CG or just graphics) is a field of [computer science](compsci.md) that deals with visual information. The field doesn't have strict boundaries and can blend and overlap with other possibly separate topics such as physical simulations, multimedia and machine learning. It usually deals with creating or analyzing 2D and 3D images and as such CG is used in data visualization, [game](game.md) development, [virtual reality](vr.md), [optical character recognition](ocr.md) and even astrophysics or medicine.
|
||||
Computer graphics (CG or just graphics) is a field of [computer science](compsci.md) that deals with visual information. The field doesn't have strict boundaries and can blend and overlap with other possibly separate topics such as physics simulations, multimedia and machine learning. It usually deals with creating or analyzing 2D and 3D images and as such CG is used in [data](data.md) visualization, [game](game.md) development, [virtual reality](vr.md), [optical character recognition](ocr.md) and even astrophysics or medicine.
|
||||
|
||||
We can divide computer graphics in different ways, traditionally e.g.:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -8,16 +8,16 @@ We can divide computer graphics in different ways, traditionally e.g.:
|
|||
- **[rendering](rendering.md)**: Creating images.
|
||||
- **[computer vision](computer_vision.md)**: Extracting information from existing images.
|
||||
- by basic elements:
|
||||
- **raster**: Deals with images composed of a uniform grid of points called [pixels](pixel.md) (in 2D) or [voxels](voxel.md) (in 3D).
|
||||
- **vector**: Deals with images composed of geometrical primitives such as curves or triangles.
|
||||
- **[raster](raster_graphics.md)**: Deals with images composed of a uniform grid of points called [pixels](pixel.md) (in 2D) or [voxels](voxel.md) (in 3D).
|
||||
- **[vector](vector_graphics.md)**: Deals with images composed of geometrical primitives such as curves or triangles.
|
||||
- by dimension:
|
||||
- **[2D](2d.md)**: Deals with images of a 2D plane.
|
||||
- **[3D](3d.md)**: Deals with images that capture three dimensional space.
|
||||
- by speed:
|
||||
- **[real time](real_time.md)**: Trying to work with images in real time, e.g. being able to produce or analyze 60 frames per second.
|
||||
- **offline**: Processes or creates images over longer time-spans, e.g. hours or days.
|
||||
- **offline**: Processes or creates images over longer time-spans, even hours or days, e.g. in 3D movie rendering.
|
||||
|
||||
Since the 90s computers started using a dedicated hardware to accelerate graphics: so called [graphics processing units](gpu.md) (GPUs). These have allowed rendering of high quality images in high [FPS](fps.md), and due to the entertainment and media industry (especially gaming), GPUs have been pushed towards greater performance each year. Nowadays they are one of the most consumerist [hardware](hardware.md), also due to the emergence of general purpose computations being moved to GPUs (GPGPU) and lately the mining of [cryptocurrencies](crypto.md). Most lazy programs dealing with graphics nowadays simply expect and require a GPU, which creates a bad [dependency](dependency.md). At [LRS](lrs.md) we try to prefer the [suckless](suckless.md) **[software rendering](sw_rendering.md)**, i.e. rendering on the [CPU](cpu.md), without GPU, or at least offer this as an option in case GPU isn't available. This many times leads us towards the adventure of using old and forgotten algorithms used in times before GPUs.
|
||||
Since the 90s computers started using a dedicated hardware to accelerate graphics: so called [graphics processing units](gpu.md) (GPUs). These have allowed rendering of high quality images in high [FPS](fps.md), and due to the entertainment and media industry (especially gaming), GPUs have been pushed towards greater performance each year. Nowadays they are one of the most consumerist [hardware](hardware.md), also due to the emergence of general purpose computations being moved to GPUs (GPGPU), lately especially mining of [cryptocurrencies](crypto.md) and training of [AI](ai.md). Most lazy programs dealing with graphics nowadays simply expect and require a GPU, which creates a bad [dependency](dependency.md) and [bloat](bloat.md). At [LRS](lrs.md) we try to prefer the [suckless](suckless.md) **[software rendering](sw_rendering.md)**, i.e. rendering on the [CPU](cpu.md), without GPU, or at least offer this as an option in case GPU isn't available. This many times leads us towards the adventure of using old and forgotten algorithms used in times before GPUs.
|
||||
|
||||
## 3D Graphics
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ The word is used in a number of projects, e.g.:
|
|||
- **[Linux for niggers](linux_for_niggers.md)**
|
||||
- **[niggercoin](niggercoin.md) [cryptocurrency](crypto.md)**
|
||||
- **[+NIGGER](plusnigger.md)**: license modifier that uses this politically incorrect term to prevent corporations from adopting free projects.
|
||||
- **[Gay Nigger Association of America](gnaa.md)** (GNAA): what the name says
|
||||
- ...
|
||||
|
||||
[LMAO](lmao.md) they're even censoring art and retroactively changing classical works of art to suit this [newspeak](newspeak.md), just like all previous oppressive regimes. E.g. Agatha Christie's book *Ten Little Niggers* was renamed to *And Then There Were None*. Are they also gonna repaint Mona Lisa when it somehow doesn't suit their liking?
|
||||
|
|
10
race.md
10
race.md
|
@ -1,16 +1,16 @@
|
|||
# Race
|
||||
|
||||
*All races are to coexist in love and peace, despite their differences.*
|
||||
*All races of men are to coexist in love and peace, despite their differences.*
|
||||
|
||||
Races of people are very large, loosely defined groups of genetically similar (related) people. Races usually significantly differ by their look and in physical, mental and cultural aspects. The topic of human race is nowadays forbidden to be critically discussed and researched, however there at least exists a number of older research and some things about race are completely obvious. [Good society](less_retarded_society.md), unlike for example our current [capitalist](capitalism.md) society, acknowledges the differences between human races and lets them coexist peacefully in social equality despite their differences and without any need for [bullshit](bullshit.md) such as [political correctness](political_correctness.md).
|
||||
Races of people are very large, loosely defined groups of genetically similar (related) people. Races usually significantly differ by their look and in physical, mental and cultural aspects. The topic of human race is nowadays forbidden to be critically discussed and researched, however there at least exists a number of older research, information hidden in the underground and some things about race are completely obvious to those with an open mind. [Good society](less_retarded_society.md), unlike for example our current [capitalist](capitalism.md) society, acknowledges the differences between human races and lets them coexist peacefully in social equality despite their differences and without any need for [bullshit](bullshit.md) such as [political correctness](political_correctness.md).
|
||||
|
||||
Denying the facts regarding human race is called [race denialism](race_denialism.md), the acceptance of these facts is called [race realism](race_realism.md). Race denialism is part of the basis of today's [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) political ideology, theories such as polygenism (multiregional hypothesis) -- the idea that different races evolved from different pre-humans, i.e. Asians from asian monkeys, Africans from african monkeys etc. -- are forbidden to be supported and they're ridiculed and demonized by mainstream information sources like [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) who only promote the [politically correct](political_correctness.md) "out of Africa" theory. [SJWs](sjw.md) reject any idea of a race with the same religious fanaticism with which Christian fanatics opposed Darwin's evolution theory.
|
||||
|
||||
Race can be told from the shape of the skull or one's [DNA](dna.md), which finds use e.g. in forensics to help solve crimes. It is officially called the *ancestry estimation*. Some idiots say this should be forbidden to do because it's "racist" lmao.
|
||||
**Race can be told from the shape of the skull and one's [DNA](dna.md)**, which finds use e.g. in forensics to help solve crimes. It is officially called the *ancestry estimation*. Some idiots say this should be forbidden to do because it's "racist" lmao. Besides the obvious visual difference such as skin color **races also have completely measurable differences acknowledged even by modern "science"**, for example unlike other races about 90% of Asians have dry earwax. Similar absolutely measurable differences exist in height, body odor, alcohol and lactose tolerance, high altitude tolerance, vulnerability to specific diseases, hair structure, cold tolerance, risk of obesity and others. While dryness of earwax is really a minor curiosity, it is completely unreasonable to believe that race differences stop at traits we humans find unimportant and that genetics somehow magically avoids affecting traits that are harder to measure and which our current society deems politically incorrect to exist. In fact differences in important areas such as intelligence were measured very well -- these are however either censored or declared incorrect and "debunked" by unquestionable "science" authorities, because politics.
|
||||
|
||||
Most generally races are called by the color of their skin, i.e. White (Caucasian), Black (African), Yellow (Asian) and Brown (Indian). But the lines can be drawn in many ways, some go as far as calling different nations separate races (e.g. the Norwegian race, Russian race etc.).
|
||||
Most generally races are called by the color of their skin, the most apparent attribute, i.e. White (Caucasian), Black (African), Yellow (Asian) and Brown (Indian). But the lines can be drawn in many ways, some go as far as calling different nations separate races (e.g. the Norwegian race, Russian race etc.).
|
||||
|
||||
There is a controversial 1994 book called *The Bell Curve* that deals with differences in intelligence between races. [SJWs](sjw.md) indeed tried to attack it, however international experts on intelligence agree the book is correct in saying average intelligence between races differs (see e.g. [The Wall Street Journal's Mainstream Science on Intelligence](https://web.archive.org/web/20120716184838/http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/taboos/wsj_main.html)). An online resource with a lot of information on racial differences is e.g. http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/.
|
||||
There is a controversial 1994 book called *The Bell Curve* that deals with differences in intelligence between races. [SJWs](sjw.md) indeed tried to attack it, however international experts on intelligence agree the book is correct in saying average intelligence between races differs (see e.g. [The Wall Street Journal's Mainstream Science on Intelligence](https://web.archive.org/web/20120716184838/http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/taboos/wsj_main.html)). An online resource with a lot of information on racial differences is e.g. http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com/. See also e.g. https://en.metapedia.org/wiki/Race_and_morphology. Note that even though the mentioned sites may be fascist, biased and contain propaganda of their own, they provide links to resources which the pseudoleftist mainstream such as [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) and [Google](google.md) simply censor -- while we may not promote the politics and opinions of mentioned sites, we link to them to provide access to censored information so that one can seek truth and form his own opinions.
|
||||
|
||||
In relation to [technology](tech.md)/[math](math.md)/[science](science.md) it is useful to know the differences in intellect between different races, though cultural and other traits linked to races may also play a big role. It is important to keep in mind intelligence isn't one dimensional, it's one of the most complex and complicated concepts we can be dealing with (remember the famous test that revealed that chimpanzees greatly outperform humans at certain intellectual tasks such as remembering the order of numbers seen for a very short period of time). We can't simplify to a single measure such as [IQ](iq.md) score. Let intelligence here mean simply the ability to perform well in the area of our art. And of course, there are smart and stupid people in any race, the general statements we make are just about statistics and probabilities.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
6
rust.md
6
rust.md
|
@ -13,8 +13,8 @@ It should be made clear that **rust is [shit](shit.md)** AND **CANNOT BE FIXED**
|
|||
- Rust has no specification, it tries to discourage other implementations and as such greatly hurts basic principles of freedom. Lack of fixed specifications also creates [update culture](update_culture.md) etc.
|
||||
- Rust is [fascist](fascism.md) [tranny software](tranny_software.md) -- not because it is written by trannsexuals, but because it sports political discrimination through [codes of conduct](coc.md) and creating a de-facto monopoly on the language (with [bloat monopoly](bloat_monopoly.md), lack of specification, kicking people out of development based on their political views etc.).
|
||||
- Its selling point is supposed to be memory safety but that makes the language extremely slow. For fast programs safety has to be turned off but then you can just write in [C](c.md), so there is no point to Rust -- definitely not as a replacement for C.
|
||||
- It ridiculously tries to be a handholding system language, i.e. an expert level language designed for beginners or incompetent people (of course with the obvious goal to empower women forced into tech etc.). Being written by pre-beginner level "[coders](coding.md)", it sets goals such as "system language should tie your hands and prevent beginner mistakes". It's like trying to design a fighter jet around the idea that it will be flown by beginners and therefore e.g. removing fire buttons because a beginner could push them by mistake.
|
||||
- It is more than anything a political language trying to push propaganda, send messages about minorities in tech instead of creating good technology, and "[fight](fight_culture.md)" and destroy languages invented by straight white men. As such it is mostly written by angry minorities such as [girls](girl.md) and trannies who can't much into technology, hence the completely shit design and implementation.
|
||||
- It ridiculously tries to be a handholding system language, i.e. an expert level language designed for beginners or incompetent people (of course with the obvious goal to empower women forced into tech etc.). Being written by pre-beginner level "[coders](coding.md)", it sets goals such as "system language should tie your hands and prevent beginner mistakes". It's like trying to design a fighter jet around the idea that it will be operated by beginners and therefore e.g. removing fire buttons or limiting top speed so as to limit dangers posed by sitting an amateur pilot in a fighter jet.
|
||||
- It is more than anything a political language trying to push propaganda, send messages about minorities in tech instead of creating good technology, and "[fight](fight_culture.md)" and destroy languages invented by straight white men -- the most popular activity of rust soydevs seems to be rewriting already existing, well established, tested and greatly optimized programs from scratch in rust. As such language it is mostly written by angry minorities such as [girls](girl.md) and trannies who can't much into technology, hence the completely shit design and implementation.
|
||||
- It tries to displace good languages such as [C](c.md) and sadly, thanks to its populism and political appeal, is becoming popular among masses of coding monkeys who have no idea about technology.
|
||||
- It is completely unnecessary in the first place, a good low level language already exists: [C](c.md). If anything, we need to improve C by making it [simpler](minimalism.md), but overcomplicated C also already exists for those who for some reason want to use a shit language: [C++](cpp.md). Rust is just flushing thousands of manhours (prolly rather soiboihours) to the toilet.
|
||||
- It is completely unnecessary in the first place, a good low level language already exists: [C](c.md). If anything, we need to improve C by making it [simpler](minimalism.md), but overcomplicated C also already exists for those who for some reason want to use a shit language: [C++](cpp.md), and there are of course also slow and safe language well suited for beginners, such as [Python](python.md). Rust is just flushing thousands of manhours (prolly rather soiboihours) to the toilet.
|
||||
- TODO: MORE, but you get the idea
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue