Update
This commit is contained in:
parent
7cb65a09cb
commit
6240f0edf2
10 changed files with 1751 additions and 1743 deletions
|
@ -198,6 +198,7 @@ This program is extremely simple, it just reads an image in [PPM](ppm.md) format
|
|||
## See Also
|
||||
|
||||
- [ANSI art](ansi_art.md)
|
||||
- [ASCII animation](ascii_animation.md) (e.g. [vt100](vt100.md) terminal animations, [asciinema](asciinema.md), ...)
|
||||
- [pixel art](pixel_art.md)
|
||||
- [plain text](plain_text.md)
|
||||
- [emoticon](emoticon.md)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ Disease is a bad state of living organism's health caused by failure of its inne
|
|||
- ...
|
||||
- lack of [IQ](iq.md)
|
||||
- [maximalism](maximalism.md)
|
||||
- [mechanical keyboard](mechanical_keyboard.md) obsession
|
||||
- [narcissism](narcissism.md)
|
||||
- [nationalism](nationalism.md)
|
||||
- [NPC](npc.md) disease
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -233,8 +233,8 @@ Bear in mind the main purpose of this quiz is for you to test your understanding
|
|||
51. hell no
|
||||
52. For example: `void r(char *s) { while (*s) s += (*s -= *s == ';') != 0; }`;
|
||||
53. Buddha (< -480), Diogenes (-404), Aristotle (-384), Caesar (-100), Jesus (around -5), Muhammad (around 570), Gutenberg (around 1400), Da Vinci (1452), Napoleon (1769), Babbage (1791), Marx (1818), Einstein (1879), Hitler (1889), Turing (1912), Stallman (1953), Torvalds (1969).
|
||||
54. For example: it's bloated, slow, can't be compiled on good computers, it's tranny software with toxic fascist community, it has issues with legal freedom (trademarks), it has [code of censorship](coc.md), it has no specification, it's obsessed with "safety", the name is complete shit, it is associated with [corporations](corporation.md), has some abomination of [OOP](oop.md), it's littered with dependencies, it's [capitalist monopoly software](capitalist_software.md), it's trying to display [C](c.md), it is hosted on [GitHub](github.md), the users are and devs idiots and so on and so forth.
|
||||
55. `967 (*) --> 378 (*) --> 168 (*) --> 48 (+) --> 12 (+) --> 3`.
|
||||
54. `967 (*) --> 378 (*) --> 168 (*) --> 48 (+) --> 12 (+) --> 3`.
|
||||
55. For example: it's bloated, slow, can't be compiled on good computers, it's tranny software with toxic fascist community, it has issues with legal freedom (trademarks), it has [code of censorship](coc.md), it has no specification, it's obsessed with "safety", the name is complete shit, it is associated with [corporations](corporation.md), has some abomination of [OOP](oop.md), it's littered with dependencies, it's [capitalist monopoly software](capitalist_software.md), it's trying to displace [C](c.md), it is hosted on [GitHub](github.md), the users are and devs idiots and so on and so forth.
|
||||
56. We can rewrite the condition as *f(x + 1) = f(x) + x* from which it's clear that the next number in the sequence is the previous one minus its position (a bit similar to [Fibonacci](fibonacci.md) sequence), so for example this sequence will satisfy the equation: 0, 0, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, ...
|
||||
57. [quine](quine.md)
|
||||
58. swastika
|
||||
|
|
1
myths.md
1
myths.md
|
@ -9,4 +9,5 @@ This is a list of myths and common misconceptions.
|
|||
- **FALSEHOOD: "Professional programmers are good programmers"**: The opposite is true, professionals are those who get paid for writing the [shittiest code](capitalist_software.md) imaginable, their aim is to make things quickly, satisfy metrics, they destroy and rape technology for profit and adhere to corporate [bullshit](bullshit.md). No skill beyond literacy is needed to do what they do, that's why we call them code monkeys, they don't and even cannot see programming as [art](art.md), they see it as something to be exploited for making living. Actual good programmer cannot psychologically bear doing this, so you cannot be a good and professional programmer at the same time, not in [21st century](21st_century.md).
|
||||
- **FALSEHOOD: "Rich people are smart and vice versa"**: It's the other way around, see [IQ](iq.md).
|
||||
- **FALSEHOOD: "Some celebrities are good people"**: Celebrities, nearly by definition, can never be good people. A lot of people seem to acknowledge that most celebrities are probably assholes, but almost everyone has that one favorite celebrity he thinks is "different", an "exception" -- it ought to be said there are no exceptions among celebrity assholes, in the same sense and by same principles by which there exist no ethical [corporations](corporation.md) or altruistic billionaires. Fame is a kind of [capital](capital.md) that's being [fought](fight_culture.md) for, it's impossible to get a celebrity status without active effort, a fight which ALWAYS comes with taking unethical steps, therefore only immoral individuals can ever become celebrities. Being known for exceptional abilities is one thing, but being a celebrity -- e.g. having one's face being shown to others frequently -- is another thing which has nothing to do with being good at something, it's solely about building one's image, taking opportunities, exploiting the system, being in right places (something that actually becomes the focus of said individual before getting better at his art). If a good man has an opportunity to become celebrity, he will willingly turn it down exactly because he is good and knows that being a celebrity is bad. So no, your celebrity is not special, he's an asshole like all other celebrities. Never worship [celebrities](hero_culture.md).
|
||||
- **FALSEHOOD: "Rational arguments, logic and civilized discussions are a superior tools capable of refuting or proving most things."** This stuff only work as long as we're firstly discussing things within boundaries of rationality and have sufficient data and tools of proofs (i.e. basically never), secondly if both sides in addition to that have truth as highest priority before anything else (nowadays never the case, priority is some other goal, mostly self interest -- it is always the case that if one doesn't ever want to be proven wrong, he can't be proven wrong) and thirdly if both sides understand rationality, can use it efficiently and agree on what rationality even is (which axioms to accept, which methods of proof are acceptable etc., all of which are irrational choices by the way).
|
||||
- TODO
|
3414
random_page.md
3414
random_page.md
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load diff
2
trom.md
2
trom.md
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ TROM (The Reality Of Me) is a project running since 2011 that's educating mainly
|
|||
|
||||
TROM was started and is run by a Romanian guy called Tio (born June 12 1988, according to blog), he has a personal blog at https://www.tiotrom.com and now lives mostly in Spain. The project seems more or less run just by him.
|
||||
|
||||
The project is funded through [Patereon](patreon.md) and has created a very impressive volume of very good quality educational materials including books, documentaries, memes, even its own [GNU](gnu.md)/[Linux](linux.md) [distro](distro.md) ([Tromjaro](tromjaro.md)). The materials TROM creates sometimes educate about general topics (e.g. language), not just those directly related to trade-free society -- Tio says that he simply likes to learn all about the world and then share his knowledge.
|
||||
The project is funded through [Patreon](patreon.md) and has created a very impressive volume of very good quality educational materials including books, documentaries, memes, even its own [GNU](gnu.md)/[Linux](linux.md) [distro](distro.md) ([Tromjaro](tromjaro.md)). The materials TROM creates sometimes educate about general topics (e.g. language), not just those directly related to trade-free society -- Tio says that he simply likes to learn all about the world and then share his knowledge.
|
||||
|
||||
The idea behind TROM is very good and similar to LRS, but just as the [Venus project](venus_project.md) it is a bit [sus](sus.md), we align with many core ideas and applaud many things they do, but can't say we 100% support everything about TROM.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
|
@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
|
|||
This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
|
||||
|
||||
- number of articles: 579
|
||||
- number of commits: 796
|
||||
- total size of all texts in bytes: 3767006
|
||||
- total number of lines of article texts: 28919
|
||||
- number of commits: 797
|
||||
- total size of all texts in bytes: 3768868
|
||||
- total number of lines of article texts: 28941
|
||||
- number of script lines: 262
|
||||
- occurences of the word "person": 8
|
||||
- occurences of the word "nigger": 73
|
||||
- occurences of the word "nigger": 74
|
||||
|
||||
longest articles:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -37,10 +37,10 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
|
|||
|
||||
- which (2155)
|
||||
- there (1636)
|
||||
- people (1423)
|
||||
- people (1424)
|
||||
- other (1180)
|
||||
- example (1158)
|
||||
- software (1059)
|
||||
- example (1161)
|
||||
- software (1062)
|
||||
- number (1034)
|
||||
- about (979)
|
||||
- program (858)
|
||||
|
@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
|
|||
- programming (645)
|
||||
- function (643)
|
||||
- these (607)
|
||||
- however (603)
|
||||
- different (601)
|
||||
- however (604)
|
||||
- different (603)
|
||||
- world (571)
|
||||
- system (555)
|
||||
- should (544)
|
||||
|
@ -68,11 +68,11 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
|
|||
- doesn (536)
|
||||
- point (531)
|
||||
- society (530)
|
||||
- though (503)
|
||||
- though (504)
|
||||
- while (498)
|
||||
- memory (497)
|
||||
- drummyfish (494)
|
||||
- using (489)
|
||||
- using (490)
|
||||
- technology (479)
|
||||
- still (477)
|
||||
- similar (472)
|
||||
|
@ -80,15 +80,30 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
|
|||
- simply (455)
|
||||
- possible (454)
|
||||
- https (445)
|
||||
- really (423)
|
||||
- really (424)
|
||||
- computers (418)
|
||||
- extremely (412)
|
||||
- always (410)
|
||||
- actually (409)
|
||||
- first (409)
|
||||
|
||||
latest changes:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Date: Wed May 8 22:32:14 2024 +0200
|
||||
21st_century.md
|
||||
acronym.md
|
||||
bloat.md
|
||||
bytebeat.md
|
||||
capitalism.md
|
||||
exercises.md
|
||||
gnu.md
|
||||
military.md
|
||||
needed.md
|
||||
random_page.md
|
||||
stereotype.md
|
||||
sw.md
|
||||
wiki_pages.md
|
||||
wiki_stats.md
|
||||
Date: Tue May 7 21:18:26 2024 +0200
|
||||
21st_century.md
|
||||
4chan.md
|
||||
|
@ -107,21 +122,6 @@ Date: Tue May 7 21:18:26 2024 +0200
|
|||
woman.md
|
||||
Date: Mon May 6 21:37:53 2024 +0200
|
||||
chess.md
|
||||
comun.md
|
||||
dick_reveal.md
|
||||
exercises.md
|
||||
jesus.md
|
||||
jokes.md
|
||||
less_retarded_society.md
|
||||
main.md
|
||||
oop.md
|
||||
programming_language.md
|
||||
race.md
|
||||
random_page.md
|
||||
wiki_pages.md
|
||||
wiki_stats.md
|
||||
xxiivv.md
|
||||
Date: Sun May 5 23:13:54 2024 +0200
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
most wanted pages:
|
||||
|
@ -155,8 +155,8 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
|
|||
- [bloat](bloat.md) (200)
|
||||
- [free_software](free_software.md) (165)
|
||||
- [game](game.md) (139)
|
||||
- [suckless](suckless.md) (132)
|
||||
- [proprietary](proprietary.md) (116)
|
||||
- [suckless](suckless.md) (133)
|
||||
- [proprietary](proprietary.md) (117)
|
||||
- [computer](computer.md) (93)
|
||||
- [kiss](kiss.md) (92)
|
||||
- [modern](modern.md) (89)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ WARNING: **DO NOT DONATE TO WIKIPEDIA** as the donations aren't used so much for
|
|||
|
||||
{ Lol I'm banned at Wikipedia now (UPDATE: blocked globally on all their sites now, can't even log in and defend on my talk page), reason being I expressed unpopular opinions on my personal website OUTSIDE Wikipedia :D UPDATE: one guy messaged me more people started to be banned and invited me to an anti-wikipedia forum here https://wikipediasucks.co/forum/, check it out. Also some more stuff on censorship and bias on Wikipedia: https://www.serendipity.li/cda/censorship_at_wikipedia.htm. ~drummyfish }
|
||||
|
||||
Shortly after the project started in 2001, Wikipedia used to be a great project -- it was very similar to how [LRS wiki](lrs_wiki.md) looks right now; it was relatively unbiased, objective, well readable and used plain [HTML](html.md) and [ASCII art](ascii_art.md) (see it as https://nostalgia.wikipedia.org/wiki/HomePage), however over the years it got corrupt and by 2020s it has become a political battleground and kind of a [politically correct](political_correctness.md) [joke](jokes.md). A tragic and dangerous joke at that. It's still useful in many ways but it just hardcore censors facts and even edits direct quotes to push a [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) propaganda. **Do not trust Wikipedia, especially on anything even remotely touching politics**, always check facts elsewhere, e.g. in old paper books, on Metapedia, Infogalactic etc. As old Wikipedia is still accessible, you may also browse the older, less censored version, to see how it deranged from a project seeking truth to one abusing its popularity for propaganda.
|
||||
Shortly after the project started in 2001, Wikipedia used to be a great project -- it was very similar to how [LRS wiki](lrs_wiki.md) looks right now; it was relatively unbiased, objective, well readable and used plain [HTML](html.md) and [ASCII art](ascii_art.md) (see it as https://nostalgia.wikipedia.org/wiki/HomePage), however over the years it got corrupt and by 2020s it has become a political battleground and kind of a [politically correct](political_correctness.md) [joke](jokes.md). A tragic and dangerous joke at that. It's still useful in many ways but it just hardcore censors facts and even edits direct quotes to push a [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) propaganda. **Do not trust Wikipedia, especially on anything even remotely touching politics**, always check facts elsewhere, e.g. in old paper books, on Metapedia, Infogalactic etc. Also bear in mind the **extreme pseudoleftist bias** in absolutely everything you read on Wikipedia, every single sentence is shaped by evils of [feminism](feminism.md), [gay fascism](lgbt.md), black supremacy and so on -- for example wherever there has a woman been even remotely involved in invention of something, she will automatically be credited with that invention over a man, and anything putting women in negative light (even in fiction) will be obscured; for example the article (May 2024) about the book *The Chrysalids* mentions that the work describes a place where people have *bizarre habits*, it fails to mention these bizarre habits are women putting men in cages, torturing them and abusing them only for reproduction. In reading anything you will be strategically manipulated this way, existence of topic that would be "dangerous" for you to research is strategically hidden from you because Wikipedia is not just an encyclopedia, it is a "safe space" protecting children from "bad information" etc. Thankfully as old Wikipedia is still accessible, you may also browse the older, less censored version, to see how it deranged from a project seeking truth to one abusing its popularity for propaganda.
|
||||
|
||||
Wikipedia exists in many (more than 200) versions differing mostly by the [language](language.md) used but also in other aspects; this includes e.g. Simple English Wikipedia or Wikipedia in [Esperanto](esperanto.md). In all versions combined there are over 50 million articles and over 100 million users. English Wikipedia is the largest with over 6 million articles.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ And the bad things are (see also this site: http://digdeeper.club/articles/wikip
|
|||
- Wikipedia is **not [public domain](public_domain.md)**. It is licensed under [CC-BY-SA](cc_by_sa.md) which is a [free](free_culture.md) license, but has a few burdening conditions. We belive knowledge shouldn't be owned or burdened by any conditions.
|
||||
- Even though there are no commercial ads (yet), there regularly appears **political propaganda**, main page just **hard pushes [feminist](feminism.md) shit** as featured images and articles, there appear popups and banners for LGBT/feminist activism and of course all articles are littered with [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) propaganda etc. The issues is it's not just an encyclopedia anymore where you go get your information, it's a group with opinions that's trying to drag you somewhere -- you just go look up some mathematical formula and suddenly you see something like "YAY, LET'S CELEBRATE WOMEN IN AFRICA TODAY", even if it was something you agree with (which it isn't) it's just as annoying and out of place in an encyclopedia as capitalist ads. UPDATE: **In 2024 Wikipedia finally put on highly intrusive pop ups and in-text messages begging for money** -- basically like what you see on any porn site -- this means the project is basically dead at this point and they're just milking the corpse -- that's good, Wikipedia certainly won't be missed.
|
||||
- **Many articles are bought**, there exist companies that offer editing and maintaining certain articles in a way the client desires and of course corporations and politicians take this opportunity -- of course Wikipedia somewhat tries to prevent it but no prevention ever works 100%, so a lot of information on Wikipedia is either highly misleading, untrue, censored or downright fabricated.
|
||||
- **Wikiepdia is for children**, it openly admits it wants to "protect children" so the content is written for children, no information that could harm a child (for example something that could make a child sad) is included, so if you want an encyclopedia for adults, one that favors truth over safety, Wikipedia is not for you.
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
.-------------------------------------------------------------.
|
||||
|
|
4
work.md
4
work.md
|
@ -27,3 +27,7 @@ Here are some ways in which it is possible to avoid work:
|
|||
- **Going to jail**: in some countries jail are quite luxurious and once in jail you can just refuse to work as they cannot lock you up more. In jail you have shelter and food, i.e. already more than most people in a capitalist society. However watch out: for some crimes you may just get fined, not actually locked up, so it's good to study the law to know which crimes it's best to commit to safely get one to jail.
|
||||
- **Become a prostitute (usually for [women](woman.md))**: it's easy money and you literally get paid for having sex. Unless you're real ugly it may be enough to just "work" like this for a few days in a month.
|
||||
- ...
|
||||
|
||||
## See Also
|
||||
|
||||
- [antiwork](antiwork.md)
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue