Update

anarch.md

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 # Anarch
 
-Anarch is a [LRS](lrs.ms)/[suckless](suckless.md), [free as in freedom](free_software.md) first person shooter [game](game.md) similar to [Doom](doom.md), written by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md). It has been designed to follow the LRS principles very closely and set an example of how games, and software in general, should be written. It also tries to be compatible with principles of [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md), i.e. it promotes [anarchism](anarchism.md), anti-[capitalism](capitalism.md), pacifism etc.
+Anarch is a [LRS](lrs.md)/[suckless](suckless.md), [free as in freedom](free_software.md) first person shooter [game](game.md) similar to [Doom](doom.md), written by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md). It has been designed to follow the LRS principles very closely and set an example of how games, and software in general, should be written. It also tries to be compatible with principles of [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md), i.e. it promotes [anarchism](anarchism.md), anti-[capitalism](capitalism.md), pacifism etc.
 
 The repo is available at https://codeberg.org/drummyfish/Anarch
  or https://gitlab.com/drummyfish/anarch. Some info about the game can also be found at the [libregamewiki](lgw.md): https://libregamewiki.org/Anarch.
  
-{ Though retrospectively I can of course see many mistakes and errors about the game, I am overall quite happy about how it turned out, it got some attention among the niche of suckless lovers and many people have written me they liked the game and its philosophy. Many people have ported it to their favorite platforms, some have even written me their own expansion of the game lore, tricks they found etc. If you're among them, thank you :) ~drummyfish }
+{ Though retrospectively I can of course see many mistakes and errors about the game and though it's not nearly perfect, I am overall quite happy about how it turned out for what it is, it got some attention among the niche of suckless lovers and many people have written me they liked the game and its philosophy. Many people have ported it to their favorite platforms, some have even written me their own expansions of the game lore, tricks they found etc. If you're among them, thank you :) ~drummyfish }
 
 ```
 h@\hMh::@@hhh\h@rrrr//rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr@@@@hMM@@@M@:@hhnhhMnr=\@hn@n@h@-::\:h

democracy.md

@@ -11,4 +11,4 @@ Small brain simplification of democracy to mere "voting" may be highly ineffecti
 - **On simple issues wisdom of the crowd work very well**, as demonstrated by the famous experiment in which averaging guesses of many people on a number of beans in a jar resulted in an extremely precise estimate, a much more precise than any man alone could give. This is an example of when voting is the superior solution to making a decision.
 - **Non-experts voting on complex issues and voting on issues requiring large vision is a disaster** (which is why we mostly don't have direct democracy but rather representative one). Many retarded rightists believe direct democracy would somehow be "better" -- no, it would be indeed be infinitely worse to let braindead rednecks vote on complex issues. When a [chess](chess.md) grandmaster plays against thousands of people who make moves by voting, the master easily wins, as demonstrated e.g. by the Karpov vs the World (or Twitch plays Pokémon lol) experiment (later projects such as Kasparov vs the World had to somehow moderate and filter the move votes to give the world a chance). The reason is that the majority of weak moves voted by non-experts outweight the few good votes of experts, but also ADDITIONALLY even if only expert votes are takes, the result may be inferior because different long-term plans and visions will collide with the long term plans of others, which is probably the reason why e.g. Romans used to elect a single dictator in times of a crisis rather than relying on a council of experts. In such cases democracy may be similar to wanting to create a nice picture by averaging all pictures ever made by all people, the result will probably be just an ugly gray noisy blob (imagine e.g. creating a picture by having many pictures "vote" on color of every pixel simply by voting for the color they have on the same pixel position { Actually I've tried this now and yes, it looks just like a noisy gray blob. ~drummyfish } ). This is why it's a very bad idea to have people vote directly e.g. on complex economic or diplomatic issues. We have to say [we](we.md) do NOT advocate for dictators (we are anarchists) -- we rather believe in implementing a [decentralized](decentralization.md), self-regulating society in which we avoid the need for any dictators or governments.
 
-What happens when it is democratically decided that democracy is not a good tool for decision making? If we believe in democracy, then we have to accept its decision and stop believing in democracy, but then if we stop believing in democracy we can just reject the decision because it was made by something that's not to be trusted, but then...
+The democracy **[paradox](paradox.md)**: what happens when it is democratically decided that democracy is not a good tool for decision making? I.e. what if democracy denies its own validity?If we believe democracy is valid, then we have to accept its decision and stop believing in democracy, but then if we stop believing in democracy we can just reject the original decision because it was made by something that's not to be trusted, but then...

free_software.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Though unknown to common people, the invention and adoption of free software has
 
 **Free software is not about [privacy](privacy.md)!** That is a retarded simplification spread by cryptofascists. Free software, as its name suggests, is about freedom in wide sense, which of course may include the freedom to stay anonymous, but there are many more freedoms which free software stands for, e.g. the freedom of customization of one's tools or the general freedom of [art](art.md) -- being able to utilize or remix someone else's creation for creating something new or better. Software focused on privacy is called simply privacy respecting software.
 
-**Is free software [communism](communism.md)?** This is a question often debated by [Americans](usa.md) who have a panic phobia of anything resembling ideas of sharing and giving away for free. The answer is: yes and no. No as in it's not [Marxism](marxism.md), the kind of [evil](evil.md) pseudocommunism that plagued the world not a long time long ago -- that was a hugely complex, twisted violent ideology encompassing whole society which furthermore betrayed many basic ideas of equality and so on. Compared to this free software is just a simple idea of not applying intellectual property to software, and this idea may well function under some form of early capitalism. But on the other hand yes, free software is communism in its general form that simply states that sharing is good, it is communism as much e.g. teaching a kid to share toys with its siblings.
+**Is free software [communism](communism.md)?** This is a question often debated by [Americans](usa.md) who have a panic phobia of anything resembling ideas of sharing and giving away for free. The answer is: yes and no. No as in it's not [Marxism](marxism.md), the kind of [evil](evil.md) pseudocommunism that plagued the world not a long time long ago -- that was a hugely complex, twisted violent ideology encompassing whole society which furthermore betrayed many basic ideas of equality and so on. Compared to this free software is just a simple idea of not applying intellectual property to software, and this idea may well function under some form of early capitalism. But on the other hand yes, free software is communism in its general form that simply states that sharing is good, it is communism as much as e.g. teaching a kid to share toys with its siblings.
 
 # Definition
 

intellectual_property.md

@@ -8,4 +8,8 @@ IP exists to benefit [corporations](corporation.md), it artificially limits the
 
 Many people protest against the idea of IP -- either wanting to abandon the idea completely, as [we](lrs.md) do, or at least arguing for great relaxation the insanely strict and aggressive forms that destroy our society. Movements such as [free software](free_software.md) and [free culture](free_culture.md) have come into existence in protest of IP laws. Of course, capitalists don't give a shit. It can be expected the IP [cancer](cancer.md) will be reaching even more extreme forms very soon, for example it will be perpetual and encompassing such things as mere though (thoughts will be monitored and people will be charged for thinking about ideas owned by corporations).
 
-It must be noted that as of 2020 **it is not possible to avoid the IP shenanigans**. Even though we can eliminate most of the harmful stuff (for now) with [licenses](license.md) and [waivers](waiver.md), there are many things that may be impossible to address or posing considerable dangers, e.g. trademark, personal rights or patent troll attacks. In some countries (US) it is illegal to make free programs that try to circumvent [DRM](drm.md). Some countries make it explicitly impossible to e.g. waive copyright. It is impossible to safely check whether your creation violates on someone else's IP. There exists [shit](shit.md) such as [moral rights](moral_rights.md) that may exist even if copyright doesn't apply.
+It must be noted that as of 2020 **it is not possible to avoid the IP shenanigans**. Even though we can eliminate most of the harmful stuff (for now) with [licenses](license.md) and [waivers](waiver.md), there are many things that may be impossible to address or posing considerable dangers, e.g. trademark, personal rights or patent troll attacks. In some countries (US) it is illegal to make free programs that try to circumvent [DRM](drm.md). Some countries make it explicitly impossible to e.g. waive copyright. It is impossible to safely check whether your creation violates on someone else's IP. There exists [shit](shit.md) such as [moral rights](moral_rights.md) that may exist even if copyright doesn't apply.
+
+## See Also
+
+- [illegal number](illegal_number.md)

main.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Welcome to [Less Retarded Wiki](lrs_wiki.md), an [encyclopedia](encyclopedia.md)
 
 { We have reached 2^9 articles, yay! Yeah, some are just empty, but it's nice. ~drummyfish }
 
-DISCLAIMER: All opinions expressed here are facts.
+DISCLAIMER: All opinions expressed here are facts. I agree with myself 100%.
 
 ```
       .:FFFFF:.     .:FFFFF:.                .:FFFFFFFFFFF:.                     .:FFFFFFFFFFF:.

smallchesslib.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Smallchesslib
 
-Smallchesslib (SCL) is a small [CC0](cc0.md) [LRS](lrs.md)/[suckless](suckless.md) [chess](chess.md) [library](library.md) written in [C](c.md) by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md). It is a single header library written in fewer than 4000 [lines of code](loc.md), with no [dependencies](dependency.md) and comes with a tiny engine called *smolchess*. It implements the basic chess rules as well as those of chess960, convenience functions (even primitive board picture export), handling of basic formats such as FEN and PGN, and a simple alpha-beta minimax [AI](ai.md) -- *smolchess* played on lichess where it got a rating of about 1500 (https://lichess.org/@/smolchessbot). The repository is available at https://codeberg.org/drummyfish/smallchesslib. Smallchesslib/smolchess is extremely simple and been tested to run even on super weak platform such as [Arduboy](arduboy.md) which only has some 2 KB of RAM! That's pretty incredible, no?
+Smallchesslib (SCL) is a small [CC0](cc0.md) [LRS](lrs.md)/[suckless](suckless.md) [chess](chess.md) [library](library.md) written in [C](c.md) by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md). It is a single header library written in fewer than 4000 [lines of code](loc.md), with no [dependencies](dependency.md) and comes with a tiny engine called *smolchess*. It implements the basic chess rules as well as those of chess960, convenience functions (even primitive board picture export), handling of basic formats such as FEN and PGN, and a simple alpha-beta minimax [AI](ai.md) -- *smolchess* played on lichess where it got a rating of about 1500 (https://lichess.org/@/smolchessbot). The repository is available at https://codeberg.org/drummyfish/smallchesslib. Smallchesslib/smolchess is extremely simple and has been tested to run even on super weak platform such as [Arduboy](arduboy.md) which only has some 2 KB of RAM! That's pretty incredible, no?
 
 ```
      A B C D E F G H

unretard.md

@@ -2,7 +2,10 @@
 
 Unretarding means aligning oneself with the *less retarded [software](lrs.md) and [society](less_retarded_society.md)* after acquiring necessary education and mindset. This [wiki](lrs_wiki.md) should help achieve this goal.
 
+Nowadays unretarding is almost synonymous to learning to live and think in exact opposite ways we have been taught to by [modern](modern.md) society.
+
 ## See Also
 
+- [how to](how_to.md)
 - [nirvana](nirvana.md)
 - [zen](zen.md)

yes_they_can.md

@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
 # Yes They Can
 
-If you think [they](they.md) can't do something, you are wrong; unless it is directly violating a law of physics, they can do it. For example you may think "haha they can't start selling air, people would revolt", "hahaaa, they can't make people believe 1 + 1 equals 2000, it's too obvious of a lie" or "hahaaa they can't lie about history when there is a ton of direct evidence for the contrary freely accessible on the internet, they can't censor something that's all over the internet and in billions of books" -- yes, they can do all of this. With enough [capitalism](capitalism.md) you can make people believe a circle to be square, they have already made people desire their everyday torture, they made people believe colors and offensive statistics are just culturally constructed hallucinations, feminists have already made people widely believe a woman can beat an adult man -- a naive man of the past would likely believe this to be impossible as well. Well, we see under capitalism it is quite possible.
+If you think [they](they.md) can't do something, you are wrong; unless it is directly violating a law of physics, they can do it. For example you may think "haha they can't start selling air, people would revolt", "hahaaa, they can't make people believe 1 + 1 equals 2000, it's too obvious of a lie" or "hahaaa they can't lie about history when there is a ton of direct evidence for the contrary freely accessible on the internet, they can't censor something that's all over the internet and in billions of books" -- yes, they can do all of this. With enough [capitalism](capitalism.md) you can make people believe a circle to be square, they have already made people desire their everyday torture, they made people believe colors and offensive statistics are just culturally constructed hallucinations, feminists have already made people widely believe a woman can beat an adult man -- a naive man of the past would likely believe this to be impossible as well. Well, we see under capitalism it is quite possible.
+
+Resisting overlords is always futile in the end, the only hope is to establish [society without overlords](anarchism.md). You think "hahaha, if we create this super encrypted/decentralized computer network, we can simply communicate and they can do nothing about it, BAZINGA" -- well, no you can't. How can they stop this? They will simply ban computers you idiot, in fact you have only given them the reason to. You say "hahaha but I can have this calculator in my basement hidden" -- well, how many people will participate in your network if revealing such participation is punished not only by death sentence, but death sentence for you whole family; if even people who know about you participating in the network and not reporting you face the same punishment (already the case in some pseudocommunist countries)? If in addition people have no free time, if they don't have electricity at home, no will to live and there are also government signal jammers everywhere just in case? Enjoy your guerrilla resistance network with three people. You say "bbbb...but that cant happen ppl would revolt" -- NO. Have you seen chicken at chicken farm revolt? (Except in that one movie lol). "BBBb...BUT... people are not chicken". NO. People are literally physically chicken (to a stupid argument you get stupid counterargument).