Add exercises
This commit is contained in:
parent
7797711ca9
commit
6e39106a24
1 changed files with 22 additions and 3 deletions
25
exercises.md
25
exercises.md
|
@ -2,15 +2,18 @@
|
|||
|
||||
Here let be listed exercises for the readers of this wiki. You can allow yourself to as many helpers and resources as you find challenging: with each problem you should either find out you know the solution or learn something new while solving it.
|
||||
|
||||
1. SOMETHING EASY SHOULD BE HERE SO THAT NUBS ARENT DISCOURAGED BY FIRST QUESTION xD
|
||||
1. What's the difference between [free software](free_software.md) and [open source](open_source.md)?
|
||||
2. Write a program in [C](c.md) that computes the value of [pi](pi.md) without using float/double and any libraries except for `stdio.h` and `stdint.h` -- you can only use built-in integer types and those from `stdint.h`. The program must compute pi as accurately as possible (at least 2 decimals) and write the value out as base 10 decimal.
|
||||
3. Say we have an algorithm that finds all pairs of equal numbers in an array of numbers of length *N* and adds all of these (unordered) pairs to a set *S*. The algorithm is: `for i := 0 to N: for j := 0 to N: if numbers[i] == numbers[j]: add(S,set(i,j))`. How can we optimize the algorithm in terms of its execution speed (i.e. make it perform fewer operations)? How did the asymptotic time complexity ("big O") class change?
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Solutions
|
||||
|
||||
A solution to each problem should be listed here -- keep in mind there may exist other solutions that those listed here.
|
||||
|
||||
**solution 1**:
|
||||
TODO
|
||||
|
||||
Both movements share very similar rules of licensing and technically free software and open-source are largely the same. However, free software is fundamentally aiming for the creation ethical software -- that which respects its user's freedom -- while open source is a later movement that tries to adapt free software for the business and abandons the pursuit of ethics.
|
||||
|
||||
**solution 2**:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -58,4 +61,20 @@ int main(void)
|
|||
printf("%d.%d\n",pi / DECIMALS,pi % DECIMALS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**solution 3**:
|
||||
|
||||
In the given algorithm we compare all numbers twice. This can be avoided by not comparing a number to previous numbers in the array (because these have already been compared). Additionally we don't have to compare the same number to itself, a number will always be equal to itself:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
for i := 0 to N:
|
||||
add(S,i,i) // no need to compare
|
||||
|
||||
for i := 0 to N:
|
||||
for j := i + 1 to N:
|
||||
if numbers[i] == numbers[j]:
|
||||
add(S,set(i,j))
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
While the first algorithm performs N^2 comparisons, the new one only needs N - 1 + N - 2 + N - 3 + ... ~= N * N / 2 = N^2 / 2 comparisons. Even though the new version is always twice as fast, its time complexity class remains the same, that is O(N^2).
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue