Update
This commit is contained in:
parent
cf7680ee94
commit
6f8eee7efa
18 changed files with 2005 additions and 1977 deletions
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
|||
# 3D Model
|
||||
|
||||
In the world of [computers](computer.md) and [programming](programming.md) (above all in [computer graphics](graphics.md), but also in physics simulations, 3D printing etc.) 3D model is a representation of a [three dimensional](3d.md) object, for example of a [real life](irl.md) object such as a car, [tree](tree.md) or a [dog](dog.md), but also possibly something more abstract like a [fractal](fractal.md) or [function](function.md) plot surface. It is [model](model.md) in [mathematical](math.md) sense, i.e. an [approximation](approximation.md) or idealization of a shape that usually exists in real world but in its infinite complexity couldn't be represented in the computer. A very common thing we'll want to do with a 3D models is to draw it on the screen -- we call this [3D rendering](3d_rendering.md) and can achieve it using various rendering techniques and [algorithms](algorithm.md), but much more can be done with 3D models: for example they're used to perform simulations of the [real world](real_world.md) (e.g. [games](game.md), architectural calculations, car crash simulations, ...), because real world is, as we know, three dimensional. 3D models can be created in various ways too, e.g. manually with 3D modeling software (such as [Blender](blender.md)) by 3D [artists](art.md), by 3D scanning real world objects, automatically using [procedural generation](procgen.md), [artificial intelligence](ai.md) etc. It is even possible to create 3D models without a computer, just with [pen and paper](pen_and_paper.md).
|
||||
In the world of [computers](computer.md) and [programming](programming.md) (above all in [computer graphics](graphics.md), but also in physics simulations, 3D printing etc.) 3D model is a representation of a [three dimensional](3d.md) object, for example of a [real life](irl.md) object such as a car, [tree](tree.md) or a [dog](dog.md), but also possibly something more abstract like a [fractal](fractal.md) or [function](function.md) plot surface. It is [model](model.md) in [mathematical](math.md) sense, i.e. an [approximation](approximation.md) or idealization of a shape that usually exists in real world but in its infinite complexity couldn't be represented in the computer. One of the first things we'll want to do with a 3D model is to draw it on the screen -- we call this [3D rendering](3d_rendering.md), and this may be achieved through various rendering techniques and [algorithms](algorithm.md), but 3D models serve many more purposes than graphics: for example they're a vital part of simulations of the [real world](real_world.md) physics (e.g. [games](game.md), architectural calculations, car crash simulations, ...), because real world is, as we know, three dimensional. 3D models can be created in various ways too, e.g. manually with 3D modeling software (such as [Blender](blender.md)) by 3D [artists](art.md), by 3D scanning real world objects, automatically using [procedural generation](procgen.md), [artificial intelligence](ai.md) etc. It is even possible to create 3D models without a computer, just with [pen and paper](pen_and_paper.md).
|
||||
|
||||
In the world of computer graphics there exist various famous 3D models that are often used for testing and presentation of new algorithms. These include for example the Utah Teapot (Bezier patch model, from 1976) and Stanford Bunny (scanned model, 69451 tris, 35947 verts).
|
||||
In the world of computer graphics there exist various famous 3D models often used as "de facto standard" test subjects of new algorithm and/or for presentation thereof. These include for example the Utah Teapot (Bezier patch model, from 1976) and Stanford Bunny (scanned model, 69451 tris, 35947 verts).
|
||||
|
||||
There is a plethora of different 3D model types, the topic is very wide spanning and volume of literature is enormous when examining it in the scope of all possible areas that 3D models are used in because 3D models can really be used and represented in many ways, each of which is a tradeoff of various attributes that have different weights in different areas and industries. Everything is yet more complex by dealing with different methods of 3D rendering that favor different representations of 3D models -- the universal, **mainstream "game" 3D models** that most people are used to seeing are polygonal (basically made of triangles) boundary-representation (recording only surface, not volume) [textured](texture.md) (with "pictures" on their surface) 3D models, but be aware that many different ways of representation are possible and in common use by the industry, for example various volume representations, [voxel](voxel.md) models, [point clouds](point_cloud.md), [implicit surfaces](implicit_surface.md), [spline](spline.md) surfaces, [constructive solid geometry](csg.md), [wireframe](wireframe.md), hybrid etc. Models may also bear additional extra information and features, e.g. material, mass, bone rigs for animation, animation key frames, density information, collision shapes, [LODs](lod.md), even [scripts](scripting.md) and so on.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
# Bilinear Interpolation
|
||||
|
||||
Bilinear interpolation (also bilinear filtering) is a simple way of creating a smooth transition ([interpolation](interpolation.md)) between [discrete](discrete.md) samples (values) in 2D, it is a [generalization](generalization.md) of [linear interpolation](lerp.md) to 2 dimensions. It is used in many places, popularly e.g. in 3D [computer graphics](graphics.md) for **[texture](texture.md) filtering**; bilinear interpolation allows to upscale textures to higher resolutions (i.e. compute new pixels between existing pixels) while keeping their look smooth and "non-blocky" (even though blurry). On the scale of quality vs simplicity it is kind of a middle way between a simpler [nearest neighbour](nearest_neighbour.md) interpolation (which creates the "blocky" look) and more complex [bicubic interpolation](bicubic.md) (which uses yet smoother curves but also requires more samples). Bilinear interpolation can further be generalized to [trilinear interpolation](trilinear.md) (in computer graphics trilinear interpolation is used to also additionally interpolate between different levels of a texture's [mipamap](mipamp.md)) and perhaps even bilinear [extrapolation](extrapolation.md). Many frameworks/libraries/engines have bilinear filtering built-in (e.g. `GL_LINEAR` in [OpenGL](ogl.md)). Of course this method may be used to smooth not just textures but anything, for example terrain [heightmaps](heightmap.md) or just any discrete mathematical function that we simply want to have defined everywhere, it's not just graphics thing, but here we will focus on its application in [graphics](graphics.md).
|
||||
Bilinear interpolation (also bilinear filtering) is a simple way of creating a smooth transition ([interpolation](interpolation.md)) between [discrete](discrete.md) samples (values) in 2D, it is a [generalization](generalization.md) of [linear interpolation](lerp.md) to 2 dimensions. It is used in many places and popularly encountered e.g. in 3D [computer graphics](graphics.md) as a method of **[texture](texture.md) filtering**; bilinear interpolation allows for upscaling textures to higher resolutions (i.e. insert new pixels in between existing pixels) whilst keeping their look smooth and "non-blocky" (even though blurry). On the scale of quality vs simplicity it is kind of a middle way between a simpler [nearest neighbour](nearest_neighbour.md) interpolation (which creates the "blocky" look) and more complex [bicubic interpolation](bicubic.md) (which uses yet smoother curves but also requires more samples). Bilinear interpolation can further be generalized to [trilinear interpolation](trilinear.md) (in computer graphics trilinear interpolation is used to also additionally interpolate between different levels of a texture's [mipamap](mipamp.md)) and perhaps even bilinear [extrapolation](extrapolation.md). Many frameworks/libraries/engines come with bilinear filtering built-in as a standard feature (e.g. `GL_LINEAR` in [OpenGL](ogl.md)). Of course this method is not limited to upscaling textures and can be applied to any set of discrete samples such as terrain [heightmaps](heightmap.md) or any kind of discrete mathematical function which we want to automatically generalize to all [real numbers](real_number.md), it's not something encountered only in [computer graphics](graphics.md), even though this article will still mostly view it from the graphics perspective.
|
||||
|
||||
Why is it named *bilinear*? Probably because it's doing linear interpolation twice: once in *X* direction, then in *Y* direction.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2,16 +2,18 @@
|
|||
|
||||
*You can do what you want, but you can't want what you want.*
|
||||
|
||||
Free will is a [logically](logic.md) erroneous [egocentric](egoism.md) belief that humans (and possibly other living beings) are special in the [universe](universe.md) by possessing some kind of "soul" which may disobey laws of [physics](physics.md) and somehow [miraculously](magic.md) make spontaneous, unpredictable decisions according to its "independent" desires. Actually that's the definition of *absolute* *indeterminate* free will; weaker definitions are also possible, e.g. *volitional free will* means just that one's actions are determined internally, or for the purposes of law definitions based on one's sanity may be made. But here we'll focus on the philosophical definition as that's what most [autism](autism.md) revolves around. The Internet (and even academic) debates of free will are notoriously retarded to unbelievable levels, similarly to e.g. debates of [consciousness](consciousness.md).
|
||||
Free will is a [logically](logic.md) erroneous [egocentric](egoism.md) belief that humans (and possibly other living beings) are special in the [universe](universe.md) by possessing some kind of "soul" which may disobey laws of [physics](physics.md) and somehow [miraculously](magic.md) make spontaneous, unpredictable decisions according to its "independent" desires. Actually that's the definition of *absolute* *indeterminate* free will; weaker definitions are also possible, e.g. *volitional free will* means just that one's actions are determined internally, or for the purposes of law definitions based on one's sanity may be made. But here we'll focus on the philosophical definition as that's what most [autism](autism.md) revolves around. The Internet (and even academic) debates of free will notoriously reach unbelievably retarded levels, similarly to e.g. debates of [consciousness](consciousness.md) (which is a similar, but separate and distinct concept).
|
||||
|
||||
{ Sabine nicely explains it here [https://yewtu.be/watch?v=zpU_e3jh_FY](https://yewtu.be/watch?v=zpU_e3jh_FY). Amlux recently published an excellent commentary on determinism and free will: [https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=opjVNbCvaGw](https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=opjVNbCvaGw) which even has a text version: [https://pantsuprophet.xyz/writings/essays/along-for-the-ride.html](https://pantsuprophet.xyz/writings/essays/along-for-the-ride.html). ~drummyfish }
|
||||
|
||||
The question of free will typically comes up during discussions related to **[determinism](determinism.md)**, the concept of everything (including human thought and behavior) being completely predetermined from the start of the universe. Determinism is the most natural and most probable explanation for the working of our universe; it states that laws of nature dictate precisely which state will follow from current state and therefore everything that will every happen is only determined by the initial conditions (start of the universe). Without any doubt, as human brain is just matter like any other, it is no exception to the laws of nature. Determinism doesn't imply we'll be able to make precise predictions (see e.g. [chaos](chaos.md) or [undecidability](undecidability.md)), just that all is essentially already set in [stone](rock.md) as a kind of unavoidable fate. The only alternative option to this is that there would exist some kind of "true [randomness](randomness.md)", i.e. that laws of nature don't specify an exact state to follow from current state but rather multiple states out of which one is "taken" at random -- this is proposed by some [quantum](quantum.md) physicists as quantum physics seems to be showing the existence of inherent randomness. Nevertheless **quantum physics may still be deterministic**, see the theory of hidden variables and [superdeterminism](superdeterminism.md) (no, Bell test didn't disprove determinism). But **EVEN IF the universe is non deterministic, free will still CANNOT exist**. Therefore this whole debate is meaningless.
|
||||
The question of free will typically comes up during discussions related to **[determinism](determinism.md)**, the concept of everything (including human thought and behavior) being completely predetermined from the start of the universe. Determinism is the most natural and most probable explanation for the working of our universe; it states that laws of nature dictate precisely which state will follow from current state and therefore everything that will every happen is only determined by the initial conditions (start of the universe). Without any doubt, as human brain is just matter like any other, it is no exception to the laws of nature. Determinism doesn't imply we'll be able to make precise predictions (see e.g. [chaos](chaos.md) or [undecidability](undecidability.md)), just that all is essentially already set in [stone](rock.md) as a kind of unavoidable fate. The only alternative option to this is that there would exist some kind of "true [randomness](randomness.md)", i.e. that laws of nature don't specify an exact state to follow from current state but rather multiple states out of which one is "taken" at random -- this is proposed by some [quantum](quantum.md) physicists as quantum physics seems to be showing the existence of inherent randomness. Nevertheless **quantum physics may still be deterministic**, see the theory of hidden variables and [superdeterminism](superdeterminism.md) (no, Bell test didn't disprove determinism). But **EVEN IF the universe is non deterministic, free will still CANNOT exist**. And thus the whole debate is meaningless.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why is there no free will?** Because it turns out to not be logically possible, just as for example the existence of omnipotent God shows to be logically impossible (could he make a toast so hot he wouldn't be able to eat it?). Either the universe is deterministic and your decisions are already predetermined, or there exists an inherent randomness and your decisions are determined by a mere dice roll (which no one can call a free will more than just making every decision in life based on a coin toss). In the end it's even unknowable to us whether true randomness exists or if we're simply missing some hidden variables or lacking computational power to perfectly predict the future, this question pertains to metaphysics and whatever the answer might be, it doesn't even matter to our case, we know randomness exists because we cannot predict the future, the mechanisms behind randomness (our inability to predict future) are irrelevant. In either case your decisions are made for you by something "external". Even if you follow a basic definition of free will as "acting according to one's desires", you find that your decisions are DETERMINED by your desires, i.e. something you did not choose (your desires, which are determined by your DNA and your environment) makes decisions for you. There is no way but rejection of logic itself.
|
||||
|
||||
For some reason retards (basically everyone) don't want to accept this, as if accepting it changed anything, stupid [capitalists](capitalism.md) think that it would somehow belittle their "achievements" or what? Basically just like the people who used to let go of geocentrism. This is ridiculous, they hold on to the idea of their "PRECIOOOOUUUSS FREE WILL" to the death, then they go and consume whatever a TV tells them to consume. Indeed one of the most retarded things in the universe.
|
||||
|
||||
Similarly free will is neither a logical consequence for nor a prerequisite of consciousness. There can be consciousness without free will (wherein the conscious soul is just a spectator, like a train passenger looking out of the window) -- this is to say that consciousness isn't, as some think, a proof of free will. Consciousness is a metaphysical concept and the presence of consciousness (or lack thereof) in others can never be proven by [science](science.md), it is knowledge unobtainable within our universe.
|
||||
|
||||
## See Also
|
||||
|
||||
- [anthropocentrism](anthropocentrism.md)
|
||||
|
|
4
furry.md
4
furry.md
|
@ -12,7 +12,9 @@ In the [1990s](90s.md) we were wondering whether by 2020 we'd already have cured
|
|||
|
||||
It is conjectured that all furries are [gay](gay.md).
|
||||
|
||||
{ POST DISCLAIMER: Firstly I have to disclaim I hate disclaimers, consider it more of a note. Some of my very best online friends are furries, I hope they'll forgive me for this article, hopefully it's clear I never hate any individual on a personal level, I criticize the culture. Is it surprising that furrydom isn't particularly appealing to an old borderline-boomer like me? Should I lie about it? Am I wrong in my claims about the toxicity of the furry community? So what's the problem? Yeah, I do hate furrydom, but if you don't mind being friends with me, I will love to be friends with you no matter what, I really don't give a damn about this shite. Peace <3 ~drummyfish }
|
||||
From sociological point of view furrydom is but one of many modern cults -- alongside bronies, otakus, [trannies](transsexual.md), [feminists](feminism.md) and many others -- at least one of which every [NPC](npc.md) is [culturally](culture.md) required to subscribe to, just like in Antiquity you would hardly find a commoner that didn't worship any gods. Only the most enlightened have always been wise enough to not go with the flow and to restrain from retardation of joining such cults.
|
||||
|
||||
{ POST [DISCLAIMER](dislaimer.md): Firstly I have to disclaim I hate disclaimers, consider it more of a note. Some of my very best online friends are furries, I hope they'll forgive me for this article, hopefully it's clear I never hate any individual on a personal level, I criticize the culture. Is it surprising that furrydom isn't particularly appealing to an old borderline-boomer like me? Should I lie about it? Am I wrong in my claims about the toxicity of the furry community? So what's the problem? Yeah, I do hate furrydom, but if you don't mind being friends with me, I will love to be friends with you no matter what, I really don't give a damn about this shite. Peace <3 ~drummyfish }
|
||||
|
||||
## See Also
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
2
lgbt.md
2
lgbt.md
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
*This article is a part of series of articles on [fascism](fascism.md).*
|
||||
|
||||
LGBT, LGBTQ+, LGBTQ卐, rainbow terrorists, LGBTJKSLANKWQHHUXAWQIOSJBBNQ (lesbian, [gay](gay.md), [bisexual](bisexual.md), [transsexual](tranny.md), "[queer](queer.md)" and whatever is yet to be invented), also FGTS or TTTT (transsexual transsexual transsexual transsexual) is a [toxic](toxicity.md), vengeful [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) [fascist](fascist.md) political group whose ideology is based on superiority of certain selected minority sexual orientations. They are a highly [violent](violence.md), [toxic](toxic.md), [bullying](bully.md) and militant movement (not surprisingly centered in the [US](usa.md) but already spread around the whole world) practicing [censorship](censorship.md), Internet lynching ([cancel culture](cancel_culture.md)), discrimination, spread of extreme [propaganda](propaganda.md), harmful [lies](soyence.md), culture poison such as [political correctness](political_correctness.md) and other [evil](evil.md). LGBT is to being gay what the worship of Spaghetti Monster is to being religious, except for being serious and militant as a bonus. LGBT uses a flag with all colors of puke.
|
||||
LGBT, LGBTQ+, LGBTQ卐, LGBTQHIV+, rainbow terrorists, (lesbian, [gay](gay.md), [bisexual](bisexual.md), [transsexual](tranny.md), "[queer](queer.md)" and whatever is yet to be invented), also FGTS or TTTT (transsexual transsexual transsexual transsexual) is a [toxic](toxicity.md), vengeful [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) [fascist](fascist.md) political group whose ideology is based on superiority of certain selected minority sexual orientations. They are a highly [violent](violence.md), [toxic](toxic.md), [bullying](bully.md) and militant movement (not surprisingly centered in the [US](usa.md) but already spread around the whole world) practicing [censorship](censorship.md), Internet lynching ([cancel culture](cancel_culture.md)), discrimination, spread of extreme [propaganda](propaganda.md), harmful [lies](soyence.md), culture poison such as [political correctness](political_correctness.md) and other [evil](evil.md). LGBT is to being gay what the worship of Spaghetti Monster is to being religious, except for being serious and militant as a bonus. LGBT uses a flag with all colors of puke.
|
||||
|
||||
LGBT is related to the concept of equality in a similar way in which crusade wars were related to the nonviolent teaching of [Jesus](jesus.md), it shows how an idea can be completely twisted around and turned on its head as to be left completely contradicting its original premise.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
|
|||
| job/work | slavery |
|
||||
| Korea | Samsung Republic |
|
||||
| "left" | [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md), SJW |
|
||||
| [LGBT](lgbt.md) | FGTS, TTTT |
|
||||
| [LGBT](lgbt.md) | FGTS, TTTT, LGBTQ卐, LGBTWTF, LGBTQHIV+ |
|
||||
| [liberal](liberal.md) | libtard |
|
||||
| "[Linux](linux.md)" | [GNU](gnu.md), lunix, loonix |
|
||||
| [logic gate](logic_gate.md) | logic gayte |
|
||||
|
|
2
main.md
2
main.md
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
|
@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ There exist many terms that are highly similar and can legitimately be used inte
|
|||
- **[comun](comun.md)** vs **[conum](conum.md)**
|
||||
- **[concurrency](concurrency.md)** vs **[parallelism](parallelism.md)** vs **[quasiparallelism](quasiparallelism.md)** vs **[distribution](distributed.md)**
|
||||
- **[conjecture](conjecture.md)** vs **[hypothesis](hypothesis.md)** vs **[theory](theory.md)** vs **[theorem](theorem.md)** vs **[lemma](lemma.md)**
|
||||
- **[consciousness](consciousness.md)** vs **[free will](free_will.md)** vs **self awareness** vs **thinking**
|
||||
- **[constant](constant.md)** vs **[literal](literal.md)** vs **immediate operand** vs **[macro](macro.md)**
|
||||
- **[coding](coding.md)** vs **[programming](programming.md)** vs **[software engineering](software_engineering.md)**
|
||||
- **[codec](codec.md)** vs **[container format](container_format.md)**
|
||||
|
@ -95,6 +96,7 @@ There exist many terms that are highly similar and can legitimately be used inte
|
|||
- **[derivative](derivative.md)** vs **[differential](differential.md)**
|
||||
- **[discretization](discretization.md)** vs **[quantization](quantization.md)**
|
||||
- **disc** vs **disc**
|
||||
- **display** vs **screen** vs **monitor**
|
||||
- **[duck typing](duck_typing.md)** vs **[weak typing](weak_typing.md)** vs **[dynamic typing](dynamic_typing.md)** vs **[no typing](untyped.md)**
|
||||
- **[digit](digit.md)** vs **[number](number.md)** vs **[value](value.md)** vs **figure** vs **numeral**
|
||||
- **[directed acyclic graph](dag.md)** vs **[tree](tree.md)**
|
||||
|
@ -179,6 +181,7 @@ There exist many terms that are highly similar and can legitimately be used inte
|
|||
- **[shading](shading.md)** vs **[shadows](shadow.md)**
|
||||
- **[static typing](static_typing.md)** vs **[strong typing](strong_typing.md)**
|
||||
- **[strategy](strategy.md)** vs **[tactics](tactics.md)**
|
||||
- **transcript** vs **transcription**
|
||||
- **[Unicode](unicode.md)** vs **[UTF](utf.md)**
|
||||
- **[webpage](webpage.md)** vs **[website](website.md)**
|
||||
- **[wiki](wiki.md)** vs **[Wikipedia](wikipedia.md)**
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
|
|||
# Programming Style/Code Formatting
|
||||
|
||||
Probably in majority of cases a [programming language](programming_language.md) lets the programmer choose the aesthetic style in which to write the code (just like a writer may format his text in visually different ways without changing the meaning of it) -- one has a choice in naming variables, indentation and aligning commands, inserting [comments](comment.md) and so on. This gives rise to various styles -- typically a programmer will have his own preferred style, kind of like handwriting, but once he works in a team, some compromise has to be found to which everyone must conform so as to keep the code nice, consistent and [readable](readability.md) by everyone. Some project, e.g. [Linux](linux.md), have evolved quite good, tested and de facto standardized styles, so instead of inventing a custom style (which may not be as easy as it sounds) one may choose to adopt some of the existing styles. While this is more of a surface-level part of programming, it is still quite important and thinking about it may go very deep, it is not to be underestimated.
|
||||
[Programming language](programming_language.md) practically always leaves the programmer some [freedom](freedom.md) of styling that can increase (but also decrease) the aesthetic quality and readability of code, just like a writer has freedom in typesetting and choosing different words to express the same idea. As an example we can choose the variable names at our leisure without affecting how the program functions, expressions may include extra unnecessary brackets for better clarity or leave them out for shorter code and brevity, we can (and should) inserting [comments](comment.md), add proper indentation and whitespaces and so on. This gives rise to various programming styles; typically a programmer develops or adopts his own style over time, a "handwriting" of sort, but in a team compromises have to be found and everyone must temporarily conform to the same agreed style so as to preserve consistency and [readability](readability.md), just like artists have to follow the same visual style as part of larger collaborative work. Some project, e.g. [Linux](linux.md), have evolved quite good, tested and de facto standardized styles, so instead of inventing a custom style (which may not be as easy as it sounds) one may adopt some of the existing ones. While formatting and naming may not appear to be so important at first, it mustn't be underestimated as readability issues typically start to show later on as the project grows. On the other hand, however, it's not so difficult to reformat even a relatively large codebase in later stages ([regular expressions](regex.md) and similar tools can help with this very well), it's definitely much easier than reworking the code's architecture.
|
||||
|
||||
There exist automatic code formatters, they are often called **code beautifiers**. But not everything can be automated, for example a program will hardly comment your code, or inserting empty spaces to separate logically related parts of a sequential code is also something that human like intelligence is needed for.
|
||||
|
||||
## Recommended LRS C Programming Style/Formatting
|
||||
|
||||
Here we propose a programming style and C code formatting you may use in your programs. { It's basically a style I personally adopted and fine-tuned over many years of my programming. ~drummyfish } Remember that nothing is set in stone (except that you mustn't use tabs), the most important thing is usually to be consistent within a single project and to actually think about why you're doing things the way you're doing them. Keeping to the standard set here will gain you advantages such as increased readability for others already familiar with the same style and avoiding running into traps set by short-sighted decisions e.g. regarding identifiers. Try to think from the point of view of a programmer who gets just your source code without any way to communicate with you, make his life as easy as possible. Also suppose he's reading your code on a calculator. The LRS style/formatting rules follow:
|
||||
Here we propose a programming style and C code formatting you may use in your programs. { It's basically a style I personally adopted and fine-tuned over many years of my programming. ~drummyfish } Remember that nothing is set in [stone](rock.md) (except that you mustn't use tabs), the most important rule of style is to maintain consistency within a single [project](project.md) and to actually think about why you're doing things the way you're doing them. Sticking to the standard presented here will gain you advantages such as increased readability for others already familiar with the same style and avoiding falls into traps of short-sighted decisions, e.g. regarding identifiers. Try to think from the point of view of a programmer who gets just your source code without any way to communicate with you, make his life as easy as possible. Also assume he's reading your code on a calculator. The LRS style/formatting rules follow:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Respect the [LRS](lrs.md) design principles** ([KISS](kiss.md), no [OOP](oop.md), avoid dependencies such as [stdlib](stdlib.md) etc.).
|
||||
- **Indentation: use two spaces, NEVER use [tabs](tab.md)**. Why? Tabs are ugly, tricky (look the same as spaces) non-standard behaving characters (behavior is dependent on editor and settings, some processors will silently convert tabs and spaces, copy-paste may do so also etc.), they don't carry over to some platforms (especially paper), some very simple platforms may not even support them; your source will contain spaces either way, no need to insert additional blank character.
|
||||
|
|
3794
random_page.md
3794
random_page.md
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load diff
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
# Shitword
|
||||
|
||||
Shitwords are words commonly used and perceived as positive, which under closer inspection are revealed to stand for [evil](evil.md) things. Shitwords are bad in being misused, misleading, sustaining evil mentality and pushing [harmful](hamrful.md) concepts; they're typically encountered in propaganda (usually spread without the speaker even realizing he is doing it). Nevertheless these words are part of practically all daily conversation in [21st century](21st_century.md) dystopia; currently the only place where they are correctly handled is [this wiki](lrs_wiki.md). Note that these words must NOT be [censored](censorship.md), for censorship is itself an evil that must never be practiced -- it is very important to realize we must NOT support development of [newspeak](newspeak.md) like [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md) tries to. Instead we must simply realize what the words stand for, what harm they do, and use them correctly. The difference here is the same as applying speech filters and censorship (wrong) and applying mindfulness to become better aware of what we previously ignored (correct).
|
||||
Shitwords are very [shitty](shit.md) words, typically ones in wide use and perceived as positive when under closer inspection they're revealed to actually signify something [evil](evil.md). They may also be words that are overused, unnecessary, shifting focus on wrong concepts, being arbitrarily invented by crappy ideologies etc. Shitwords are bad in being misused, misleading, sustaining evil mentality and pushing [harmful](hamrful.md) concepts; they're typically encountered in propaganda (usually spread without the speaker even realizing he is doing it). Nevertheless these words are part of practically all daily conversation in [21st century](21st_century.md) dystopia; currently the only place where they are correctly handled is [this wiki](lrs_wiki.md). Note that these words must NOT be [censored](censorship.md), for censorship is itself an evil that must never be practiced -- it is very important NOT to develop any form of [newspeak](newspeak.md) like [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md) does -- this is not a blacklist but a wall of shame. Instead of "removing" words we must rather realize what they truly stand for, what harm they bring, and start to treat them accordingly. The difference here is the same as applying speech filters and censorship (wrong) and applying mindfulness to become better aware of what we previously ignored (correct).
|
||||
|
||||
Shitwords include the following:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ Shitwords include the following:
|
|||
- **respect**: has valid uses (mostly as a verb, e.g. "I respect your opinion"), but is often used as a euphemism and [fuzzy](fuzzy.md) propaganda term, appearing a lot in [COCs](coc.md) to establish generic "we can ban you for whatever we want" rules such as "treat others with respect" (where respect stands for things that the forum admin likes)
|
||||
- **responsibility**: punishment (even if only internal, psychological) for bad behavior, based on guilt, limits freedom
|
||||
- **[revolution](revolution.md)**: means violence, hysteria, war, angry mob, blind destruction of anything old, guillotines and bloodshed
|
||||
- **[retro](retro.md)**: retro things only attempt to LOOK like old ones (while internally staying poisoned with [modern](modern.md) technology), implying for example [pseudominimalism](pseudominimalism.md) etc., also a [buzzword](buzzword.md)
|
||||
- **[retro](retro.md)**: sometimes may be legit but it's more of a rule now that retro things only attempt to imitate, to LOOK like old ones (while internally staying poisoned with [modern](modern.md) technology), implying for example [pseudominimalism](pseudominimalism.md) etc., also a [buzzword](buzzword.md)
|
||||
- **(human/legal) [right](rights_culture.md)**: establishes that "what's not explicitly allowed is forbidden", increases reliance on [law](law.md) and focus on mere legality, makes basic freedoms into privileges, makes people slaves to constant activism; "right" is often used to mean "restriction" (as in [copyright](copyright.md) etc.)
|
||||
- **safe space**: another euphemism that sounds like almost opposite of what it really is: a place of terror, highly controlled, censored, monitored police-state dystopia enforcing specific political thinking, eliminating [freedom of speech](free_speech.md), yielding absolute control to the state (or server owner etc.)
|
||||
- **safety**: buzzword related to "protection", "safe space", comes with loss of [freedom](freedom.md), yielding power to others etc.
|
||||
|
@ -57,15 +57,15 @@ Shitwords include the following:
|
|||
|
||||
## See Also
|
||||
|
||||
- [shit](shit.md)
|
||||
- [newspeak](newspeak.md)
|
||||
- [euphemism](euphemism.md)
|
||||
- [shortcut thinking](shortcut_thinking.md)
|
||||
- [newspeak](newspeak.md)
|
||||
- [often misunderstood](often_misunderstood.md)
|
||||
- [often confused](often_confused.md)
|
||||
- [LRS dictionary](lrs_dictionary.md)
|
||||
- [buzzword](buzzword.md)
|
||||
- shitwords per second: measure of stupidity
|
||||
- [newspeak](newspeak.md)
|
||||
- [harmful](harmful.md)
|
||||
- [desu](desu.md)
|
||||
- [voldemort](voldemort.md)
|
|
@ -2,9 +2,9 @@
|
|||
|
||||
Trolling (as a verb) is a fairly recent term that has evolved alongside the [Internet](internet.md) and whose meaning ranges from an activity of purposefully causing [drama](drama.md) (mostly on the Internet) for entertainment (the original, narrower meaning) to just shamelessly abusing rules of any system for self interest on the detriment of others (wider meaning, e.g. *[patent](patent.md) trolling*, pre-election *media trolling* etc.). Core value of the narrow-sense trolling is simply [fun](fun.md) on the detriment of others -- usually making someone angry -- but not every fun making can be called trolling -- bullying weaker, for example, isn't trolling, despite it bringing some fun; trolling has to have a bit of cleverness in it, it typically finds a way of legally do something nasty, i.e. [hacking](hacking.md) the rules of the game. Trolls are those who before the Internet would be called something like jokers or pranksters, however [real life](irl.md) pranks have limited potential -- on the Internet on the other hand trolling can flourish (likely owing to the aspect of [anonymity](anonymity.md), lack of nonverbal communication, lack of consequences and responsibility and so on), so this [art](art.md) has evolved into something more, it is by now an inseparable part of Internet [culture](culture.md) (and should probably become protected by Unesco). Some forms of trolling provide so much fun they're even illegal. Trolling is not about being [evil](evil.md), it is about having fun, it is cherished by cool people who don't take things too seriously and can make fun of themselves and is therefore embraced by forums like [4chan](4chan.md); on the other hand it is demonized by those without sense of humor, those who fear the power of humor (e.g. dictators and fascists) and those who mostly get butthurt by it ([reddit](reddit.md), [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) and other "safe space" networks). [Evil](evil.md) is always afraid of fun.
|
||||
|
||||
Trolling is a very entertaining, healthy and refreshing activity, unfortunately spoiled by mentally retarded people who have no idea about how Internet works -- they come to the Internet and try to behave like it was real life. That's extremely stupid, it's like trying to behave normally in a video game or coming to a jungle and behaving like it was a city, the man who does this absolutely doesn't understand what's going on and fucks everything up. If you are one of them, leave the Internet now please, or at least stay with your grandma on Facebook.
|
||||
Trolling is a very entertaining, healthy and refreshing activity, unfortunately actively opposed by mentally retarded idiots who cannot comprehend the Internet -- they come to the Internet and try to behave like it was real life, like someone visiting a foreign country and starting to dictate how its people should behave. That's highly stupid, it's like trying to behave normally in a video game or coming to a jungle and behaving like it was a city, the man who does this absolutely doesn't understand what's going on and fucks everything up. If you are one of them, leave the Internet now please, or at least stay with your grandma on [Facebook](facebook.md).
|
||||
|
||||
In [modern](21st_century.md) times **trolling is started to be demonized and even criminalized**, similarly to demonizing "conspiracy theories", politically incorrect jokes and other forms of free thinking and art, that's why it's important to support trolling more. Back in the day trolling may have been seen as annoying at worst, nowadays people will try to push laws for punishing "trolls" and promote the idea that it's a dangerous, possibly life endangering mental illness, labeling someone a troll is quite close to labeling him a psychopath or terrorist. Don't fall for this, let trolling prosper, it's simply fun, people's culture, folklore, humanity and art.
|
||||
In [modern](21st_century.md) times **trolling started to be demonized and even criminalized**, similarly to demonizing "conspiracy theories", politically incorrect [jokes](jokes.md) and other forms of free thinking and [art](art.md), and that's why it is crucial to support trolling more. Back in the day trolling may have been seen as annoying at worst, nowadays people will try to push laws for punishing "trolls" and promote the idea that it's a dangerous, possibly life endangering mental illness, labeling someone a troll is quite close to labeling him a psychopath or terrorist. Don't fall for this, let trolling prosper, it's simply fun, people's culture, folklore, humanity and art.
|
||||
|
||||
NOTE: That who performs trolling is called a *troll*, a word taken from Nordic mythology where it stands for a fantastic, weird kind of creature that lives in forests, caves or under bridges. Trolls are often a [race](race.md) in many fantasy universes (e.g. Warcraft, LOTR, Harry Potter, ...) -- there their appearance isn't very unified, some make them big, stupid giants, others paint them as tall but human sized creatures with tusks and so on. Further on we'll just be discussing trolls as related to *trolling*.
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Here are some potentially entertaining ways of trolling (they'll be written from
|
|||
- **Creative [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) vandalism aka [Creative TrollLolz](creative_commons.md)**: for example funny redirects or categorizations (put [Bill Gates](bill_gates.md) to "famous homosexuals" category or something), also consider vandalizing other wikis that usually don't have as much protection.
|
||||
- `a:hover { display: none; }`
|
||||
- **Stream/game raids** became very popular with the onset of streaming and child abusing MMOs, maybe the most iconic was the Habbo Hotel "Pool's closed" raid. [4chan](4chan.md) is one of such raid enjoyers, however very specialized groups such as soyjak.party emerged who live off almost exclusively of organizing such raids. A stream raid mostly goes like this: some toxic tranny prostitute is making children masturbate on Twitch and figures out it will steal more attention (money) by forcing audience interaction in form of some gayme in which the audience can participate -- this is where the fun begins. There are shitty games that for example let people write rap songs that are then read by text to speech synthesizer or choose titles for albums or the marble racing game where users can set their avatar pictures etc. Of course here comes the party that just storms this with images of goatse or some [nigger](nigger.md) quotes, the streamer starts to rage because he is now showing an image of protruding hairy asshole to 10000 toddlers who just wanted to watch overwatch or roblox, while in a robotic voice in the background is quoting Hitler and calling for the final solution, which of course is not very good for the streamer's career :D In best scenarios the streamer gets banned. { See for example these video clip gems at https://soyjakwiki.net/Jackbox_Raiding#Clips :D ~drummyfish }
|
||||
- **Classic trollz** revolve around creating [drama](drama.md) on forums -- this is kind of an [art](art.md) as you have to keep the right balance of seriousness and stupidity; too much of the former and you're not trolling anyone, too much of the latter and you're just spotted as obvious troll. It's definitely not about logging on a starting to drop the [N-words](nigger.md) and insulting everyone, that's just an instant ban that ends the fun; you rather want to start slow, get many people seriously involved in the discussion, be polite and then slightly steer the talk towards something controversial (nice if you pretend to be part of some "oppressed minority"). Then you just make it look like you're just an uneducated simple minded individual who kind of happens to lean towards an opinion the others truly hate, but you have to keep their hope that they can convince you to change your opinion, so still try to be polite, just so you keep arguing with them and wasting more and more of their time until they start losing their shit and the thread explodes into [hitler](hitler.md) arguments etc., then just watch and enjoy.
|
||||
- **Classic trollz** revolve around creating [drama](drama.md) on forums -- this is kind of an [art](art.md) as you have to keep the right balance of seriousness and stupidity; too much of the former and you're not trolling anyone, too much of the latter and you're just spotted as obvious troll. Unlike for a reddit [atheist](atheism.md), the goal of a troll is not to demonstrate superior intelligence in a discussion but rather lack thereof, but it's not about entering a forum and immediately dropping [N-words](nigger.md) and insults left and right either, that's just an instant ban that ends the fun; you rather want to start slow, get many people seriously involved in the discussion, be polite and then slightly steer the talk towards something controversial (nice if you pretend to be part of some "oppressed minority"). Then you just make it look like you're just an uneducated simple minded individual who kind of happens to lean towards an opinion the others truly hate, but you have to keep their hope that they can convince you to change your opinion, so still try to be polite, just so you keep arguing with them and wasting more and more of their time until they start losing their shit and the thread explodes into [hitler](hitler.md) arguments etc., then just watch and enjoy.
|
||||
- **Having fun with the surveillance**: Our [modern](modern.md), bleeding edge technology combined with ultra modern [capitalism](capitalism.md) achieved the amount of [surveillance](surveillance.md) that cavemen could only dream of -- today we can enjoy being watched 24/7 everywhere and feel the warmth of sharing our private correspondence with some kind stranger so that we don't feel so alone. We can thank these good people and censors by hiding nice surprises in our correspondence just for their pleasure. The downside here is that we won't see his reaction, but just knowing about it can warm one's heart. For example when I'm sending something to another continent I know all packages come through border control to achieve great degree of PROTECTION^TM, those people just have to go looking through the things you're sending and spend lengthy days asking themselves questions such as "Why would he be sending this kind of item? Could it be suspicious that a 20 year old man is sending a dildo to a 60 year old woman? We have to think about this deeper to find reasons behind this." I know these people must be bored checking the same kind of items every day over and over, so I make unique, creative challenges for them. For example I create something that looks like drugs: I make a suspicious looking box with removable bottom and in there I put plastic bags with sugar, but that's not all of course -- this will just raise the possibility of them having to CAREFULLY check all the items I am sending, and that's where I hide all the surprises. I print out images such as goatse and photos of suicided children (in high resolution) and create a small novel sized book out of it captioned: top secret [steganography](steganography.md) information, knowing someone will have to go through it all and analyze every single picture to see if there is some kind of hidden list of drug business partners or something; then I add some weird machine, a bunch of randomly assembled gears and microchips and puzzle toys, that will make some highly paid engineer busy for several months, it'll make him scratch his head and try to figure out what the device is for (spoiler: it does nothing) -- sometimes for the border control you have to list all the items contained in the boxes, capitalists just assume that every item in the universe can be classified by their shitty tax categories, so I just create these weird unclassifiable things and invent names for them like "quazi orthosplitter gene rotator" or something (using random word generator on the Internet). A cheaper version of this act of kindness can be performed by embedding "interesting" links into one's unencrypted emails that contain "interesting" keywords such as "BOMB", "ALLAH" etc. For example I may drop in some gay porn so that the surveillance worker can literally watch porn on his shift: this will make him very happy.
|
||||
- **Satellite image vandalization**: In this [modern](modern.md) age we now have easily accessible to everyone satellite images of whole [Earth](earth.md) surface in fine resolution, isn't that awesome? I like to use this fact for the lulz. I set for a desolate place far away from civilization where no one ever walks, and there I create funny pictures and texts from logs and rocks that will be recognizable in satellite images. Even if Google spots them and applies its masterful art of censorship, there are still many other competing services and photo sets where it will be overlooked and my creations will plague the Internet for a very long time -- and as one of my creations is being censored and destroyed, I am already working on another one somewhere else. It's a relaxing activity in the wilderness and a great motivation to go outside, spend some time alone in beautiful nature. Similar effects can be achieved by planting trees (you can even mask this behind ecology activism) or even building houses in funny shapes, but obviously I'll have to wait very long to see the results here. If my artwork is big enough, people don't even notice it when walking by, it will only be visible from above. Now there are of course simple funny [words](nigger.md) that immediately come to mind that one can spam this way, but we mustn't limit our creativity so easily: we have a publicly accessible canvas onto which we can ANONYMOUSLY paint WHATEVER we want. Someone needs to be [doxxed](dox.md)? Revealed as [gay](gay.md)? Illegal information wants to be shared? What's a better place than this? Best of all if anyone gets in trouble for this, it may be the creator of the satellite image.
|
||||
- **Weird life goal troll**: This one requires extreme dedication and is a bit risky, but it might be one of the highest trolling peaks if performed successfully and well. So what's the troll here? We know that life goal cannot be objectively set, you can make your life goal whatever you want and no one can ever objectively refute it. So you can for example set your life goal to just walk forward -- you will dedicate everything to only walking forward as much as you can. You will stop going to work, you will only eat and drink if absolutely necessary, you'll just get up from the bed one day and start walking over the country in your pajamas -- if people ask you if you're alright you just say "yes, thank you". If you are starving, you just grab nearest food and eat it, if you need to sleep, you just lie down somewhere and sleep and then just walk again. Presumably you are going to end up in mental asylum soon -- there you have to just prove you're completely normal, convince them you know what you're doing, that you're not feeling any anxiety or depression, that you hear no voices, you have only set walking as your life goal -- there is no objective way to refute this life goal. You will probably end up in asylum or jail anyway sooner or later, then just try to maximize walking, be nice and lie if you have to. If they lead you to the court, just turn around and start walking out of the building. If they put you in chains, just behave nicely and say you won't try to run away -- if they take the chains down, just start walking away. Whenever you get out of jail, just start walking again and so on. Now there is a risk that you may just waste your life without attracting any attention, but you may also become famous and then highlight the fact that current society is extremely retarded and is not ready for people who aren't conforming and just set their life goal arbitrarily.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ If, unlike almost all population, you are in fact not among the joyful ignorant
|
|||
|
||||
We now exist in a highly developed dystopia that brainwashes us since the day we take our first breath so that we, instinctively and without thought, do bad things and reject good things: practically 100% of the western population is taught to act and think in EXACT OPPOSITE ways of what is good and correct. Unretarding means unlearning these harmful ways, and that can indeed show to be very difficult -- it is hard enough to try to reverse all your habits and patterns of thinking, but in addition doing so will make you seem like someone who has gone mad or is just [joking](jokes.md), which is why it'll be extremely hard to convince anyone you're serious and to find any understanding. What you have been taught is "good" is in fact usually bad and vice versa -- this is a pattern you will recognize very quickly once you adopt [LRS](lrs.md) thinking. For example most common people would probably say that [justice](justice.md), fairness, [laws](law.md), optimism, [competition](competition.md), anti-[cheating](cheating.md) measures, more computer [security](security.md) and [modern](modern.md) technology are all clearly good things -- LRS reveals they are in fact NOT, they are very bad things.
|
||||
|
||||
To start seeing through the propaganda we advise to start with the hint we just mentioned: if they system supports something and/or encourages you to do something ("Buy this!", "Go vote!" etc.) or if it rewards something or someone (i.e. someone being a celebrity, proclaimed [hero](hero_culture.md), ...), it's very likely a bad thing and vice versa; but of course we have to always confirm this using critical thinking -- for this we firstly have to know what our goal is (for us it's well being and happiness of all life), then we must turn off our [shortcut thinking](shortcut_thinking.md) and turn on [critical thinking](critical_thinking.md), and then we must start thinking the concept in question through and evaluate whether it helps our goal or not. Of course matters are not always so simple, for example recognizing who and what is part of the "system" and who is part of the opposition may not be easy and may not even have a clear yes/no answer -- many people and things are both part of the system and part of the opposition to various degrees. Nevertheless a good advice for a beginner is to consider practically everything to be part of the system, even things that to normal people look like the opposition, for example "[open source](open_source.md) communities" etc. -- part of the system is also creating an ILLUSION of opposition, people are led to believe there exists good, the system creates "fake good" to keep people optimistic and busy so that they can't truly revolt, it just makes them think they're revolting. I.e. we must adopt a presumption of [evil](evil.md), be suspicious of everything, the system is powerful, widespread and [cancerous](cancer.md), by now it has infected practically everything, at least in the western world.
|
||||
And so a good [heuristic](heuristic.md) to start using is this: if the system supports something and/or encourages you to do something ("Buy this!", "Go vote!" etc.) or if it rewards something or someone (i.e. someone being a celebrity, proclaimed [hero](hero_culture.md), ...), it's very likely a bad thing and vice versa. After all it makes sense that in a 100% [competitive](capitalism.md) world where everyone only follows self interest any advice or "recommendation" you receive must be taken for what it is: an attempt at manipulating you. No one will try to help you just like a lion won't be trying to help a gazelle. Of course it's an awful behavior but it's the behavior of people in our society and accepting it gets us closer to seeing the truth of reality, assuming malice and manipulation develops a very good intuition about our society but naturally we can't trust it blindly, as a next step we must always apply critical thinking and go more in depth -- for this we firstly have to know what our goal is (for us it's well being and happiness of all life), then we must turn off our [shortcut thinking](shortcut_thinking.md) and turn on [critical thinking](critical_thinking.md), and then we must start thinking the concept in question through and evaluate whether it helps our goal or not. Of course matters are not always so simple, for example recognizing who and what is part of the "system" and who is part of the opposition may not be easy and may not even have a clear yes/no answer -- many people and things are both part of the system and part of the opposition to various degrees. Nevertheless a good advice for a beginner is to consider practically everything to be part of the system, even things that to normal people look like the opposition, for example "[open source](open_source.md) communities" etc. -- part of the system is also creating an ILLUSION of opposition, people are led to believe there exists good, the system creates "fake good" to keep people optimistic and busy so that they can't truly revolt, it just makes them think they're revolting. I.e. we must adopt a presumption of [evil](evil.md), be suspicious of everything, the system is powerful, widespread and [cancerous](cancer.md), by now it has infected practically everything, at least in the western world.
|
||||
|
||||
## See Also
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
23
usa.md
23
usa.md
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
108
wiki_stats.md
108
wiki_stats.md
|
@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
|
|||
This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
|
||||
|
||||
- number of articles: 643
|
||||
- number of commits: 1026
|
||||
- total size of all texts in bytes: 5566023
|
||||
- total number of lines of article texts: 40040
|
||||
- number of commits: 1027
|
||||
- total size of all texts in bytes: 5571776
|
||||
- total number of lines of article texts: 40057
|
||||
- number of script lines: 324
|
||||
- occurrences of the word "person": 10
|
||||
- occurrences of the word "nigger": 153
|
||||
- occurrences of the word "nigger": 155
|
||||
|
||||
longest articles:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -35,60 +35,79 @@ longest articles:
|
|||
|
||||
top 50 5+ letter words:
|
||||
|
||||
- which (2994)
|
||||
- there (2362)
|
||||
- people (2228)
|
||||
- example (1934)
|
||||
- which (2996)
|
||||
- there (2363)
|
||||
- people (2233)
|
||||
- example (1938)
|
||||
- other (1710)
|
||||
- about (1529)
|
||||
- about (1530)
|
||||
- number (1472)
|
||||
- software (1325)
|
||||
- because (1257)
|
||||
- their (1179)
|
||||
- something (1162)
|
||||
- would (1144)
|
||||
- being (1123)
|
||||
- program (1083)
|
||||
- software (1326)
|
||||
- because (1260)
|
||||
- their (1180)
|
||||
- something (1165)
|
||||
- would (1147)
|
||||
- being (1125)
|
||||
- program (1084)
|
||||
- language (1034)
|
||||
- called (1006)
|
||||
- called (1008)
|
||||
- things (956)
|
||||
- without (929)
|
||||
- without (931)
|
||||
- simple (902)
|
||||
- numbers (882)
|
||||
- function (882)
|
||||
- computer (874)
|
||||
- computer (875)
|
||||
- different (846)
|
||||
- world (813)
|
||||
- world (817)
|
||||
- these (813)
|
||||
- programming (812)
|
||||
- however (808)
|
||||
- should (783)
|
||||
- still (780)
|
||||
- system (776)
|
||||
- should (784)
|
||||
- still (781)
|
||||
- system (777)
|
||||
- doesn (752)
|
||||
- games (740)
|
||||
- drummyfish (730)
|
||||
- possible (723)
|
||||
- always (721)
|
||||
- always (722)
|
||||
- point (712)
|
||||
- probably (705)
|
||||
- while (697)
|
||||
- society (695)
|
||||
- https (693)
|
||||
- simply (691)
|
||||
- https (679)
|
||||
- using (664)
|
||||
- someone (649)
|
||||
- using (665)
|
||||
- someone (650)
|
||||
- course (646)
|
||||
- actually (640)
|
||||
- similar (632)
|
||||
- actually (639)
|
||||
- similar (633)
|
||||
- first (622)
|
||||
- value (617)
|
||||
- though (597)
|
||||
- really (591)
|
||||
- though (598)
|
||||
- really (594)
|
||||
|
||||
latest changes:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Date: Thu May 29 17:30:19 2025 +0200
|
||||
ai.md
|
||||
backgammon.md
|
||||
color.md
|
||||
discalimer.md
|
||||
freedom.md
|
||||
lrs_dictionary.md
|
||||
main.md
|
||||
minimalism.md
|
||||
needed.md
|
||||
netstalking.md
|
||||
npc.md
|
||||
random_page.md
|
||||
sjw.md
|
||||
soyence.md
|
||||
stereotype.md
|
||||
usa.md
|
||||
wiki_pages.md
|
||||
wiki_stats.md
|
||||
Date: Mon May 26 19:29:00 2025 +0200
|
||||
ai.md
|
||||
color.md
|
||||
|
@ -107,27 +126,6 @@ Date: Mon May 26 19:29:00 2025 +0200
|
|||
wiki_pages.md
|
||||
wiki_stats.md
|
||||
woman.md
|
||||
Date: Sun May 25 18:16:38 2025 +0200
|
||||
capitalism.md
|
||||
coc.md
|
||||
doom.md
|
||||
furry.md
|
||||
lrs.md
|
||||
lrs_dictionary.md
|
||||
main.md
|
||||
number.md
|
||||
often_confused.md
|
||||
random_page.md
|
||||
recursion.md
|
||||
science.md
|
||||
shitword.md
|
||||
soydev.md
|
||||
suckless.md
|
||||
tree.md
|
||||
wiki_pages.md
|
||||
wiki_stats.md
|
||||
wiki_style.md
|
||||
woman.md
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
most wanted pages:
|
||||
|
@ -167,12 +165,12 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
|
|||
- [minimalism](minimalism.md) (130)
|
||||
- [computer](computer.md) (130)
|
||||
- [censorship](censorship.md) (127)
|
||||
- [kiss](kiss.md) (125)
|
||||
- [kiss](kiss.md) (126)
|
||||
- [fun](fun.md) (123)
|
||||
- [math](math.md) (122)
|
||||
- [shit](shit.md) (119)
|
||||
- [programming](programming.md) (119)
|
||||
- [woman](woman.md) (115)
|
||||
- [woman](woman.md) (116)
|
||||
- [art](art.md) (109)
|
||||
- [gnu](gnu.md) (108)
|
||||
- [history](history.md) (107)
|
||||
|
@ -180,7 +178,7 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
|
|||
- [linux](linux.md) (106)
|
||||
- [corporation](corporation.md) (105)
|
||||
- [fight_culture](fight_culture.md) (101)
|
||||
- [work](work.md) (97)
|
||||
- [work](work.md) (98)
|
||||
- [hacking](hacking.md) (97)
|
||||
- [internet](internet.md) (95)
|
||||
- [less_retarded_society](less_retarded_society.md) (94)
|
||||
|
|
8
woman.md
8
woman.md
|
@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ One of the most perplexing questions in [history](history.md) of mankind is the
|
|||
lol http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com
|
||||
also https://encyclopediadramatica.gay/Woman :D
|
||||
|
||||
Women are also disallowed in [sumo](sumo.md) because of their menstrual shit or something. Kek, [freemasons](freemasonry.md) also prohibit women from joining lol.
|
||||
Women are also disallowed in [sumo](sumo.md) because of their menstrual shit or something. Kek, [freemasons](freemasonry.md) also prohibit women from joining lol. In China, allegedly, they have special parking lots reserved for women, where the parking spaces are much wider.
|
||||
|
||||
**How to deal with being a woman?** Well, just as you deal with not being born Einstein, Phelps or Kasparov. It's fine to be anyone, there is no need to [fight](fight_culture.md) or compete, just try to be a good human and live a fulfilling life, you can create a lot of good. As a woman you can do for example the following:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -190,6 +190,12 @@ Yes. Have they ever achieved anything? No.
|
|||
|
||||
Kinda yes.
|
||||
|
||||
### How Much Smarter Are Women Compared To Gorillas?
|
||||
|
||||
It seems women are approximately 1.5 times smarter than gorillas.
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: compare white females to black males
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
Women are stupid.
|
||||
|
|
2
work.md
2
work.md
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
*Work is a glorification of [slavery](slavery.md).*
|
||||
|
||||
Work, better known as slavery, is an unpleasant effort that one is required to suffer, such as harvesting crops or [debugging](debugging.md) [computer](computer.md) programs. Work hurts living beings and takes away the meaning of their lives, it destroys their bodies and minds. Work makes us slaves, it wastes our lives and is a cause of a large number of [suicides](suicide.md) -- many consider it better to die than to work. One of the main goals of civilization is to eliminate any need for work, i.e. create machines that will do all the work for humans (see [automation](automation.md)). Work is for the machine, life and [art](art.md) are for the living being.
|
||||
Work, better known as slavery, is an unpleasant effort which one is required or forced to suffer, such as harvesting crops or [debugging](debugging.md) [computer](computer.md) programs. Work hurts living beings and takes away the meaning of their lives, it destroys their bodies and minds. Work makes us slaves, it wastes our lives and is among the major causes of [suicides](suicide.md) -- many consider it better to die than to work. One of the main goals of civilization is to eliminate any need for work, i.e. create machines that will do all the work for humans (see [automation](automation.md)). Work is for the machine, life and [art](art.md) are for the living being.
|
||||
|
||||
**[Fun](fun.md) fact**: the Spanish (also Portuguese etc.) word for work, "trabajo", comes from *tripalium*, a device made of three sticks used to force slaves to work. { Thanks to my friend who told me about this <3 ~drummyfish }
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue