Update
This commit is contained in:
parent
bc0419bd2b
commit
757bcb3cf1
19 changed files with 1827 additions and 1796 deletions
|
@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Some further examples of soyence:
|
|||
- "Science says god doesn't exist." aka reddit [atheism](atheism.md)
|
||||
- "We can't believe this because it wasn't peer censored and/or it didn't pass the [null ritual](null_ritual.md) and/or it wasn't published in a journal on our approved literature list." (--[Wikipedia](wikipedia.md))
|
||||
- "This gender studies expert has proven sex is a racial construct and has no biological meaning. You disagree? Well, do you have a PhD in gender studies? No? Then shut up you fucking sexist."
|
||||
- "This goes against SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS therefore it's pseudoscience and conspiration theory."
|
||||
- "This goes against SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS therefore it's pseudoscience and [conspiracy theory](conspiracy_theory.md)."
|
||||
- "This research is racist.", using terms such as "scientific racism".
|
||||
- This guy's research is invalid because in his spare time he makes videos on ufology and other "conspiracy theories", his REPUTATION AND CREDIBILITY is destroyed.
|
||||
- "We should burn these old books that say things we don't like, just in case. When Nazis did it it was different."
|
||||
|
@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ Some further examples of soyence:
|
|||
Here are a few tips on how to spot soyence:
|
||||
|
||||
- Is trust involved? Things like authority of publishers, censorship, reviews etc.? If so, it is by definition NOT science.
|
||||
- Is questioning anything at all prevented and/or punished? It is [dogma](dogma.md), not science. True science encourages questioning EVERYTHING.
|
||||
- Is emotion involved? Is someone putting energy into promoting it? If yes, it's probably a preparation of business/politics grounds, not science.
|
||||
- Is money involved? Is any form of [capital](capital.md) (money, attention, power, ...) in play? Is there any form of business connected? If so, it is business, not science.
|
||||
- Is politics involved? Will the results help some currently active political group? It's highly suspicious, it almost definitely can't be trusted, it's most likely not science.
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue