Update
This commit is contained in:
parent
bff3ec3152
commit
7a2a69bd7b
15 changed files with 1877 additions and 1869 deletions
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
# Acronym
|
||||
|
||||
Acronym is an abbreviation of a multiple word term by usually appending the starting letters of each word to form a new word.
|
||||
Acronym is an abbreviation of a multi-word term formed usually by appending the starting letters of each word to create a new, unique and hopefully funny word.
|
||||
|
||||
Here is a list of some acronyms:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,10 +1,10 @@
|
|||
# Dependency
|
||||
|
||||
Dependency of a piece of [technology](technology.md) is another piece of technology that's required for the former to [work](work.md) (typically e.g. a software [library](library.md) that's required by given computer [program](program.md)). Dependencies are [bad](shit.md)! Among programmers the term **dependency hell** refers to a very common situation of having to deal with the headaches of managing dependencies (and [recursively](recursion.md) dependencies of those dependencies). Unfortunately dependencies are also unavoidable. However we at least try to minimize dependencies as much as possible while keeping our program functioning as intended, and those we can't avoid we try to abstract (see [portability](portability.md)) in order to be able to quickly drop-in replace them with alternatives. It turns out with good approach we can minimize dependencies very close to zero.
|
||||
Dependency of a piece of [technology](technology.md) is another piece of technology that's required for the former to [work](work.md) (typically e.g. a [software](software.md) [library](library.md) that's required by given computer [program](program.md)). Dependencies are [bad](shit.md)! Among programmers the term **dependency hell** refers to a very common situation of having to deal with the headaches of managing dependencies (and [recursively](recursion.md) dependencies of those dependencies). Unfortunately dependencies are also unavoidable. However we at least try to minimize dependencies as much as possible while keeping our program functioning as intended, and those we can't avoid we try to abstract (see [portability](portability.md)) in order to be able to quickly drop-in replace them with alternatives. It turns out with good approach we can minimize dependencies very close to zero.
|
||||
|
||||
Having many dependencies is a sign of **[bloat](bloat.md) and bad design**. Unfortunately this is the reality of mainstream "[modern](modern.md)" programming. For example at the time of writing this [Chromium](chromium.md) in [Debian](debian.md) requires (recursively) 395 packages LMAO xD And these are just runtime dependency packages, we aren't even counting all the hardware features each of this package relies on etc...
|
||||
Having many dependencies is a sign of **[bloat](bloat.md) and bad design**. Unfortunately this is the reality of mainstream "[modern](modern.md)" programming. For example at the time of writing this [Chromium](chromium.md) in [Debian](debian.md) requires (recursively) 395 packages [LMAO](lmao.md) xD And these are just runtime dependency packages, we aren't even counting all the hardware features each of this package relies on etc...
|
||||
|
||||
Though dependencies are primarily bad because they endanger whole functionality of a program as such, i.e. "it simply won't run without it", they are also bad for another reason: you have no control over how a dependency will behave, if it will be implemented well and if it will behave consistently. [OpenGL](opengl.md) for example caused a lot of trouble by this because even though the API is the same, different OpenGL implementations performed differently under different situations and made one game run fast with certain combinations of GPUs and drivers and slow with others, which is why [Vulkan](vulkan.md) was created. It is also why some programmers write their own memory allocation functions even though they are available in the standard library etc. -- they know they can write one that's fast and will be fast where they want it to be.
|
||||
Though dependencies are primarily bad because they endanger whole functionality of a program as such, i.e. "it simply won't run without it", they are also bad for another reason: you have no control over how a dependency behaves, if it is implemented well and if it behaves consistently. [OpenGL](opengl.md) for example caused a lot of trouble by this because even though the API is the same, different OpenGL implementations performed differently under different situations and made one game run fast with certain combinations of GPUs and drivers and slow with others, which is why [Vulkan](vulkan.md) (lower level API) was created. It is also why some programmers write their own memory allocation functions even though they are available in the standard library etc. -- they know they can write one that's fast and will be fast where they want it to be. Even if your own function might on average be slower than that offered by the language, the consistency, control and knowledge of how exactly it behaves is often worth the price.
|
||||
|
||||
In [software](software.md) development context we usually talk about software dependencies, typically [libraries](library.md) and other software [packages](package.md) such as various [frameworks](framework.md). However, there are many other types of dependencies we need to consider when striving for the best programs. Let us list just some of the possible types:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -35,17 +35,19 @@ Why are dependencies so bad? Because your program is for example:
|
|||
|
||||
- **more [buggy](bug.md)** (more [fuck up surface](fuck_up_surface.md))
|
||||
- **less [portable](portability.md)** (to port the program you also need to port or replace all the dependencies)
|
||||
- **more expensive to [maintain](maintenance.md) (and create)** (requires someone's constant attention to just keep the dependencies up to date and keeping up with their changing API)
|
||||
- **more expensive to [maintain](maintenance.md) (and create)** (requires someone's constant attention to just keep the dependencies up to date and keeping up with their changing [API](api.md))
|
||||
- **less [future proof](future_proof.md)** and **more fragile** (your program dies as soon as one of its dependencies, or any dependency of these dependencies...)
|
||||
- **more [bloated](bloat.md) and so probably less efficient**, i.e. slower, eating up more RAM than necessary etc.
|
||||
- **more [bloated](bloat.md) and so probably less efficient**, i.e. slower, eating up more [RAM](ram.md) than necessary etc.
|
||||
- **less under your control** (in practice it's extremely difficult to [fork](fork.md), modify and maintain a library you depend on even if it's [free](free_software.md) as you just take up another project to learn and maintain, so you're typically doomed to just accept whatever is offered to you)
|
||||
- **less "secure"** (more [attack surface](attack_surface.md), i.e. potential for vulnerabilities which may arise in the dependencies) -- though we don't fancy the [privacy](privacy.md)/[security](security.md) hysteria, it is something that matters to many
|
||||
- **more dangerous [legally](law.md)** (reusing work of other people requires dealing with several to many different licenses with possibly wild conditions and there's always a chance of someone starting to make trouble such as threatening to withdraw a license)
|
||||
- **more complicated to developed and work with**, customize, modify etc. -- a nice program without dependencies is built very simply: you just download it and compile it. A program with tons of dependencies will require a complex set up of all the dependencies first, making sure they're of required versions, and then you have to build EVERYTHING of course, usually adding the need for some complex build system to even make recompiling bearable.
|
||||
- **more complicated to develop and work with**, customize, modify etc. -- a nice program with few dependencies is built very simply: you just download the source and compile it. A program with tons of dependencies will require a complex set up of all the dependencies (and their dependencies) first, making sure they're of the required versions, and then you have to build EVERYTHING of course, usually adding the need for some complex build system to even make recompiling bearable (because building everything from scratch may take hours).
|
||||
- ...
|
||||
|
||||
Really it can't be stressed enough that **ALL dependencies have to be considered**, even things such as the [standard library](stdlib.md) of a programming language or built-in features of a language that "should always" come with the language. It is e.g. common to hear C programmers say "I can just use float because it's part of C specification and so it has to be there" -- well technically yes, but in practice many C implementations for some obscure platforms will end up being unfinished, incomplete or even intentionally non-compliant with the standard, no standard can really physically force people to follow it, OR the compiler's floating point implementation may simply suck (or it HAS TO suck because there's no floating point hardware on the platform) so much that it will technically be present but practically unusable. This will mean that your program COULD work on the platform but DOESN'T, even if some piece of paper somewhere says it SHOULD. So REALLY REALLY do not use non-trivial features that you don't really need, it really does help. If you really want to make your program truly dependency light, always ask something like this: "If our civilization and all its computers disappear and only the literal text of my program survives, how hard will it be for future civilizations to make it actually run?".
|
||||
Really it can't be stressed enough that **ALL dependencies have to be considered**, even things such as the [standard library](stdlib.md) of a programming language or built-in features of a language that "should always" come with the language. It is common to hear C programmers say "I can just use float because it's part of C specification and so it has to be there" -- well technically yes, but in practice many C implementations for some obscure platforms will end up being unfinished, incomplete or even intentionally non-compliant with the standard, no standard can really physically force people to follow it, OR the compiler's floating point implementation may simply suck (or it HAS TO suck because there's no floating point hardware on the platform) so much that it will technically be present but practically unusable. This will mean that your program COULD work on the platform but DOESN'T, even if some piece of paper somewhere says it SHOULD. So REALLY REALLY do not use non-trivial features that you don't really need, it really does help. If you really want to make your program truly dependency light, always ask something like this: "If our civilization and all its computers disappear and only the literal text of my program survives, how hard will it be for future civilizations to make it actually run?".
|
||||
|
||||
## How to Avoid Them
|
||||
|
||||
TODO
|
||||
**The final solution** to dealing with dependencies is to make your system (program, OS, whatever) **[bootstrap](bootstrap.md)** from a very simple system -- let's say some abstract [bytecode](bytecode.md) that's quite easy to implement from scratch. If your program and all of its dependencies only rely on a machine capable of running such bytecode, your program will run anywhere where you implement the bytecode and where there is enough computing resources. Although this is ideal, it's quite a lot of work to create your whole computing environment from scratch, so in most cases you will probably settle for using something that already exists. Here just try to choose good, **[minimalist](minimalism.md)** technology ([C](c.md), [Forth](forth.md), plaintext formats and so on) to build your system on top of, and further minimize what you can -- libraries, programming language features, hardware you rely on etc. Think VERY hard about what you absolutely NEED and drop anything that's unnecessary. Make optional what can be made optional and if possible, offer alternatives (e.g. pure [software rendering](sw_rendering.md) as an alternative to GPU accelerated rendering). Don't use libraries for everything -- if it's simple enough, write it yourself; if you just have to make a ball bounce off of the floor, you don't have to include a whole physics library. You get the idea.
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: more
|
||||
2
linux.md
2
linux.md
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
{ At this point it's best to start using a different kernel if you can. Consider BSD or Hurd maybe. ~drummyfish }
|
||||
|
||||
Linux (also Lunix or Loonix, [egoistically](egoism.md) named after its original creator [Linus Torvalds](linus_torvalds.md)) is a partially "[open-source](open_source.md)" [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) [unix-like](unix_like.md) [operating system](operating_system.md) [kernel](kernel.md), probably the most successful "mostly [FOSS](foss.md)" kernel, nowadays already hijacked and milked by [capitalism](capitalism.md) and not worth using anymore. One of its greatest advantages was support of a lot of [hardware](hardware.md) (though probably owing greatly to the sneaky embedding of proprietary blobs in it); it ran besides others on [x86](x86.md), [PowerPC](ppc.md), [Arm](arm.md), had many [drivers](driver.md) and could be compiled to be quite small so as to run well even on very weak computers. **Linux is NOT an operating system**, only its basic part -- for a whole operating system more things need to be added, such as some kind of [user interface](ui.md) and actual user programs (so called [userland](userland.md)), and this is what [Linux distributions](linux_distro.md) do (there hundreds of these) -- Linux distributions, such as [Debian](debian.md), [Arch](arch.md) or [Ubuntu](ubuntu.md) are complete operating systems (but beware, most of them are not fully [FOSS](foss.md)). The mascot of the project is a penguin named [Tux](tux.md) (under some vague non-standard [license](license.md)). Linux is one of the biggest collaborative programming projects, as of now it has more than 15000 contributors. Despite popular misconceptions **Linux is [proprietary](proprietary.md) software** by containing [binary blobs](binary_blob.md) (pieces of proprietary code sneakily inserted into obscure parts of the source code) -- completely free distributions have to use [forks](fork.md) that remove these (see e.g. [Linux-libre](linux_libre.md), [Debian](debian.md)'s Linux fork etc.). Linux is also **greatly [bloated](bloat.md)** (though not anywhere near [Windows](windows.md) and such) and **[tranny software](tranny_software.md)**, abusing technology as a vehicle for promoting [liberal politics](sjw.md). While back in the day Linux was one of the coolest projects, by 2024 **Linux is absolute shit** and basically dead, it has [code of censorship](coc.md), it's been absolutely hijacked by capitalism, developed by the worst corporations and fascist political groups ([feminists](feminism.md), [LGBT](lgbt.md), ...), it is greatly overcomplicated for the sake of keeping a [bloat monopoly](bloat_monopoly.md), commercialized, full of [Rust](rust.md) code; there are already even backdoor popping in (see the 2024 XZ scandal), basically it's almost unusable now. The spirit, significance, journey and eventual fate of Linux are similar to e.g. [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) -- initially a project of freedom later on couldn't resist the immense capitalist pressure and eventually started selling its popularity to evil entities, becoming the opposite of its past self.
|
||||
Linux (also Lunix or Loonix, [egoistically](egoism.md) named after its original creator [Linus Torvalds](linus_torvalds.md)) is a partially "[open-source](open_source.md)" [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) [unix-like](unix_like.md) [operating system](operating_system.md) [kernel](kernel.md), probably the most successful "mostly [FOSS](foss.md)" kernel, nowadays already hijacked and milked by [capitalism](capitalism.md) and not worth using anymore. One of its greatest advantages was support of a wide range of different [hardware](hardware.md) (though probably owing a lot to the sneaky and evil inclusion of proprietary blobs in it); it ran besides others on [x86](x86.md), [PowerPC](ppc.md), [Arm](arm.md), had many [drivers](driver.md) and could be compiled to be quite small so as to run well even on very weak computers. **Linux is NOT an operating system**, only its basic part -- for a whole operating system more things need to be added, such as some kind of [user interface](ui.md) and actual user programs (so called [userland](userland.md)), and this is what [Linux distributions](linux_distro.md) do (there hundreds of these) -- Linux distributions, such as [Debian](debian.md), [Arch](arch.md) or [Ubuntu](ubuntu.md) are complete operating systems (but beware, most of them are not fully [FOSS](foss.md)). The mascot of the project is a penguin named [Tux](tux.md) (under some vague non-standard [license](license.md)). Linux is one of the biggest collaborative programming projects, as of now it has more than 15000 contributors. Despite popular misconceptions **Linux is [proprietary](proprietary.md) software** by containing [binary blobs](binary_blob.md) (pieces of proprietary code sneakily inserted into obscure parts of the source code) -- completely free distributions have to use [forks](fork.md) that remove these (see e.g. [Linux-libre](linux_libre.md), [Debian](debian.md)'s Linux fork etc.). Linux is also **greatly [bloated](bloat.md)** (though not anywhere near [Windows](windows.md) and such) and **[tranny software](tranny_software.md)**, abusing technology as a vehicle for promoting [liberal politics](sjw.md). While back in the day Linux was one of the coolest projects, by 2024 **Linux is absolute shit** and basically dead, it has [code of censorship](coc.md), it's been absolutely hijacked by capitalism, developed by the worst corporations and fascist political groups ([feminists](feminism.md), [LGBT](lgbt.md), ...), it is greatly overcomplicated for the sake of keeping a [bloat monopoly](bloat_monopoly.md), commercialized, full of [Rust](rust.md) code; there are already even backdoor popping in (see the 2024 XZ scandal), basically it's almost unusable now. The spirit, significance, journey and eventual fate of Linux are similar to e.g. [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) -- initially a project of freedom later on couldn't resist the immense capitalist pressure and eventually started selling its popularity to evil entities, becoming the opposite of its past self.
|
||||
|
||||
[Fun](fun.md) note: there is a site that counts certain words in the Linux source code, https://www.vidarholen.net/contents/wordcount. For the lulz in 2019 some word counts were: "fuck": 16, "shit": 33, "idiot": 17, "retard": 4, "hack": 1571, "todo": 6166, "fixme": 4256.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -14,10 +14,10 @@ As a good [free software](free_software.md) developer you should **use [licenses
|
|||
|
||||
**Which patent waiver to use?** You may for example copy-paste the waiver from [our own wiki](wiki_rights.md).
|
||||
|
||||
Some patents are [fun](fun.md) and bullshit, e.g. there exist bizarre patents that claim to achieve impossible things such as [perpetuum mobile](perpetuum_mobile.md) or infinitely efficient [compression](compression.md) of random data (nicely analyzed at http://gailly.net/05533051.html).
|
||||
Some patents are [funny](fun.md) and claim hilarious [bullshit](bullshit.md), e.g. there exist bizarre patents that claim to achieve impossible things such as [perpetuum mobile](perpetuum_mobile.md) or infinitely efficient [compression](compression.md) of [random](randomness.md) data (nicely analyzed at http://gailly.net/05533051.html). Capitalists are idiots.
|
||||
|
||||
## See Also
|
||||
|
||||
- [intellectual property](intellectual_property.md)
|
||||
- [copyright](copyright.md)
|
||||
- [trademark](trademark.md)
|
||||
- [trademark](trademark.md)
|
||||
|
|
@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ I have not once now encountered groups of people who tried to seriously push me
|
|||
|
||||
love & peace ~drummyfish }
|
||||
|
||||
Pedophilia (also paedophilia or paedosexuality) is a sexual orientation towards children. A pedophile is often called a *pedo* or *minor-attracted person* (map); there are also terms such as hebephilia and ephebophilia that mean attraction to a bit older "non-adults". Opposition of pedophilia is called **[pedophobia](pedophobia.md)** or [pedohysteria](pedohysteria.md) and is a form of age [discrimination](discrimination.md) and witch hunt.
|
||||
Pedophilia (also paedophilia or paedosexuality, from Greek paidos, child, and philia, love) is a sexual orientation towards children. A pedophile is often called a *pedo* or *minor-attracted person* (map); there are also terms such as hebephilia and ephebophilia that mean attraction to a bit older "non-adults". Opposition of pedophilia is called **[pedophobia](pedophobia.md)** or [pedohysteria](pedohysteria.md) and is a form of age [discrimination](discrimination.md) and witch hunt.
|
||||
|
||||
{ **important NOTE on terminology**: I was told that I should rather use different terms such as *ephebophilia* here because some people define pedophilia not as an attraction to any pre-adult, but just to very young, prepubescent children. I am now aware of this, however I will just keep using the term pedophilia to mean attraction to any pre-adult because indeed if you were to let's say admit you'd like to watch pre-18 porn, you'd still most definitely be called a pedophile. They want to keep the word *pedophile* scary and use it as a weapon, I will simply not be afraid of it and I'll be using it if that's what they want. Furthermore creating billions of new terms is an SJW style deflecting of focus from the real issue onto shallow word, it is a "gender studies" kind of bullshit similar to inventing new genders and pronouns and whatnot, which doesn't solve anything, it's just juggling words and at best shifting the hard-defined age limits which is exactly what I oppose here, so I'm not going to play along. ~drummyfish }
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,17 +6,17 @@ Productivity cult (often connected to terms such as *self improvement*, *persona
|
|||
|
||||
A human is living being, not a machine, he should live a happy relaxed life, dedicated to spending time with his close ones, raising children, enjoying the beauties of nature, exploring secrets of the universe, without stress; he should create when inspiration or a truly great necessity comes to him and when he does, he should take his time to carefully make the art great, without hasting it or forcing it. Productivity cult goes all against this, it proclaims one should be constantly spitting out "something", torturing and forcing himself, maximizing quantity on detriment of quality, undergo constant stress while suppressing rest -- that one should all the time be preoccupied with competitive [fight](fight_culture.md), deadlines, that art he creates is something that can be planned on schedule, made on deadline and assigned a calculated price tag to be an ideal consumerist product. If such stance towards life doesn't make you wanna puke, you most likely lack a soul.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not produce. Create. Art takes time and can't be scheduled.
|
||||
Do not produce. Create. Art takes time and can't be scheduled or forced.
|
||||
|
||||
The name of the cult itself [says a lot about it](name_is_important.md). While a name such as *efficiency* would probably be better, as efficiency means doing less work with the same result and therefore having more free time, it is not a surprise that capitalism has chosen the word *productivity*, i.e. producing more which means working more, e.g. for the price of free time and mental health.
|
||||
The name of the cult itself [gives away a lot](name_is_important.md). While a name such as *efficiency* would probably be better, as efficiency means doing less work with the same result and therefore having more free time, it is not a surprise that capitalism has chosen the word *productivity*, i.e. producing more which means working more, e.g. for the price of free time and mental health.
|
||||
|
||||
Productivity obsessed people are mostly idiots without the ability to think for themselves, they have desktops with "[motivational](motivation.md)" wallpapers saying shit like "the word impossible doesn't exist in my dictionary" and when you tell them if it wouldn't be better to rather establish a society where people wouldn't have to work they start screeching "HAHAA THATS IMPOSSIBLE IT CANT WORK". Productivity maximalists bully people for taking rest or doing what they otherwise enjoy in moderation -- they invent words such as "[procrastination](procrastination.md)" to create a feeling of ever present guilt induced by doing what one truly enjoys.
|
||||
Those obsessed with productivity are mostly idiots lacking the ability to think independently, they sport desktops with "[motivational](motivation.md)" wallpapers preaching shit like "the word impossible doesn't exist in my dictionary!" and when you tell them if it wouldn't be better to rather establish a society where people wouldn't have to work they start screeching "HAHAA THATS IMPOSSIBLE IT CANT WORK". Productivity maximalists bully others for taking rest or doing what they otherwise enjoy in moderation -- they invent words such as "[procrastination](procrastination.md)" to create a feeling of ever present guilt induced by doing what one truly enjoys.
|
||||
|
||||
Productivity freaks are often the ones who despise consumers, i.e. brainless zombies that consume goods, but somehow don't seem to mind being producers, a similar kind of brainless zombies that just stands on the other end of this retarded system.
|
||||
Productivity freaks love to hate on consumers, i.e. brainless zombies that just live to mindlessly consume goods, but themselves somehow don't seem to mind being producers, they can't seem to notice they're the same kind of brainless zombies who just happen to stand on the other end of this retarded chain. They live to produce excrement instead of eating it, in the end there is not much difference.
|
||||
|
||||
One of the funniest examples of productivity cult gone too far is so called "[life couching](life_couching.md)" in which the aspiring producer robots hire bullshit cult leaders, so called "life couches", to shout at them to be more productive. At least in the past slaves were aware of being slaves and tried to free themselves. I literally want to [kill myself](suicide.md).
|
||||
One of the funniest examples of productivity cult gone too far is so called "[life couching](life_couching.md)" in which the aspiring producer robots hire bullshit cult leaders, so called "life couches", to shout at them to be more productive. At least in the past slaves were aware of being slaves and tried to free themselves. I literally want to [kill myself](suicide.md) seeing this.
|
||||
|
||||
Productivity is such a big deal because **programmers are in fact actually getting exponentially less productive** due to time needed to spend on [bullshit](bullshit.md) nowadays, on overcomplicated buggy [bloat](bloat.md) and billions of frameworks needed to get basic things done -- this has been pointed out by [Jonathan Blow](jonathan_blow.md) in his talk *Preventing the Collapse of Civilization* in which he refers to the video of [Ken Thompson](ken_thompson.md) talking about how he developed the [Unix](unix.md) operating system in **three weeks**.
|
||||
Truth also be told that productivity is such a big deal because **programmers are in fact getting exponentially less productive** due to spending time on more and more [bullshit](bullshit.md), overcomplicated buggy [bloat](bloat.md) and billions of frameworks needed to get basic things done -- this has been highlighted e.g. by [Jonathan Blow](jonathan_blow.md) in his talk *Preventing the Collapse of Civilization* in which he refers to the video of [Ken Thompson](ken_thompson.md) talking about how he developed the [Unix](unix.md) operating system in **three weeks**. Back in the day if a programmer wanted to draw pixel to the screen, he just wrote a byte to specific memory address and the pixel would light up; nowadays to light up a pixel on screen one has to install [OpenGL](opengl.md) drivers and development libraries and write 100 lines of boilerplate code, and that is yet nothing compared to the world of [web development](webdev.md), publishing mobile "[apps](app.md)" etc.
|
||||
|
||||
A considerable number of people are attracted to [suckless](suckless.md) software due to its positive effects on productivity thanks to the elimination of bullshit. These are mostly the kind of above mentioned dumbasses who just try to exploit anything they encounter for [self interest](self_interest.md) without ever aiming for greater good, they don't care about Unix philosophy beyond its effects on increasing their salary. Beware of them, they poison society.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
*Not to be [confused](often_confused.md) with [coding](coding.md).*
|
||||
|
||||
Programming is the act, [science](science.md) and [art](art.md) of writing [computer](computer.md) [programs](program.md); it involves creation of [algorithms](algorithm.md) and [data structures](data_structure.md) and implementing them in [programming languages](programming_language.md). It may involve related activities such as [testing](testing.md), [debugging](debugging.md), [hacking](hacking.md) and drinking coffee.
|
||||
Programming is the act, [science](science.md) and fine [art](art.md) of writing [computer](computer.md) [programs](program.md); it involves creation of [algorithms](algorithm.md) and [data structures](data_structure.md) and implementing them in [programming languages](programming_language.md). It may involve related activities such as [testing](testing.md), [debugging](debugging.md), [hacking](hacking.md) and drinking coffee.
|
||||
|
||||
You may also encounter the term [coding](coding.md) which is used by [noob](noob.md) [wannabe programmers](soydev.md), so called "coders" or [code monkeys](code_monkey.md). "Coding" doesn't reach the quality of programming, it is done in baby handholding languages like [Python](python.md), [JavaScript](javascript.md) or [Rust](rust.md) by people with very shallow knowledge of technology and its context, barely qualified to turn on a computer (like [jewtubers](youtube.md)), who have flooded the computer industry since it became lucrative. It is mostly done for money and/or creating an image for oneself. What they do is not real programming. Do not try to imitate them.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
|||
# Pseudo 3D
|
||||
|
||||
The term pseudo 3D, also 2.5D or primitive 3D, is used for [computer graphics](graphics.md) that tries to create the illusion of [3D](3d.md) [rendering](rendering.md) while in fact only utilizing simpler techniques; genuine 3D rendering is in this case called [true 3D](true_3d.md). On consumer computers it is nowadays mostly a thing of the past as everything including cell phones now has a powerful [GPU](gpu.md) capable or most advanced 3D rendering, nevertheless for [suckless](suckless.md)/[KISS](kiss.md)/[LRS](lrs.md) programming the techniques used in the past are very interesting and useful.
|
||||
The term pseudo 3D, also 2.5D or primitive 3D (preferred by [us](lrs.md)), is used for [computer graphics](graphics.md) that only uses the simplest techniques of [3D](3d.md) [rendering](rendering.md) (such as 2D [raycasting](raycasting.md), mode7 etc.) and so creates more of an "illusion of 3D" that poses many limitations (such as those on camera movement and rotation); genuine 3D rendering that uses more advanced techniques (typically triangle rasterization, [raytracing](raytracing.md) etc.) is then called [true 3D](true_3d.md). However it's crucial to realize that EVERY 3D rendering is in the end only an illusion and so there is eventually no objective line separating primitive 3D and true 3D -- by convention some techniques ended up being assigned mostly to one group or the other, but the line is in the end drawn just arbitrarily. In the mainstream using the traditional pseudo 3D techniques is nowadays mostly a thing of the past as everything including cell phones now has a powerful [GPU](gpu.md) capable or most advanced 3D rendering (and so it is even used to "fake" the simpler techniques for aesthetic reasons), nevertheless for [suckless](suckless.md)/[KISS](kiss.md)/[LRS](lrs.md) programming the techniques used in the past are very valuable, interesting and useful, considering we greatly prefer [software rendering](sw_rendering.md).
|
||||
|
||||
For example [BSP rendering](bsp.md) rendering in early games such as [Doom](doom.md) is generally called pseudo 3D in the mainstream, however it is pretty debatable what exactly should classify as true 3D and what not because any computer rendering technique will inevitably have some kind of simplification of the true 3D reality of real life. And so the debate of "was Doom really 3D" arises. One side argues that in Doom's BSP rendering it for example wasn't possible to look up and down or have rooms above other rooms, all due to the limitations of the rendering system which this side sees as "not real 3D". However even modern 3D renderers have limitations such as mostly being able to only render models made out of triangles (while reality can have completely smooth shapes) or having a limited resolution of textures. Where to draw the line for "true 3D" is subjective -- we see it as reasonable to say that **if it looks 3D, it IS 3D**, i.e. we think Doom's graphics WAS really 3D, albeit limited. For this reason we also advise to rather use the term **primitive 3D** rather than pseudo 3D.
|
||||
As an example [BSP rendering](bsp.md) rendering in early games such as [Doom](doom.md) is generally called pseudo 3D in the mainstream, however, as stated above, it is pretty debatable what exactly should classify as true 3D and what not because any computer rendering technique will inevitably have some kind of simplification of the true 3D reality of real life. And so the debate of "Was Doom really 3D?" arises. In the end this is the same debate as "Is Pluto a planet or not?", it's just a matter or settling for a definition of a word. One side argues that in Doom's BSP rendering it for example wasn't possible to look up and down or have rooms above other rooms, all due to the limitations of the rendering system which this side sees as "not real 3D". On the other hand Doom really internally worked in 3 dimensions, player DID have a height coordinate (without it it wouldn't be able to smoothly fall into holes), but most importantly: there will always be limitations in any 3D software -- even modern 3D renderers have limitations such as mostly being able to only render models made out of [triangles](triangle.md) (while reality can have completely smooth shapes), having a limited resolution of textures (while reality has infinitely detailed surfaces), being limited by resolution of [floating point](float.md) coordinates or neglecting relativistic spacetime deformations. If we rewrite Doom rendering in OpenGL while giving the camera freedom to look up and down but keep the technical limitations for maps, is it now true 3D or not? If we have a 3D game with complete freedom of camera but with all objects only being 2D sprites, is it true 3D or not? Is Minecraft true 3D even if it can't render anything sphere-shaped? If a game uses traditional 3D rendering on the GPU to output an isometric 2D image without perspective, is it true 3D or not? Where to draw the line for "true 3D" is subjective -- we see it as reasonable to say that **if it looks 3D, it IS 3D**, i.e. we think Doom's graphics WAS really 3D, albeit limited. For this reason we also advise to rather use the term **primitive 3D** rather than pseudo 3D.
|
||||
|
||||
Techniques associated with primitive 3D are for example [2D raycasting](raycasting.md), [BSP rendering](bsp.md), [mode7](mode7.md), [parallax scrolling](parallax.md), [voxel space](voxel_space.md) terrain rendering or perspective-scaled [sprites](sprite.md).
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
2
race.md
2
race.md
|
|
@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ It is useful to know the **differences in intellect** between different races (n
|
|||
|
||||
The smartest races seem to be [Jews](jew.md) and [Asians](asian.md) (also found so by the book *Bell Curve* and many old books). Asians have always been regarded as having superior intelligence and their [religions](religion.md) and [culture](culture.md) also seem to be the most advanced, with very complex ideas (as opposed to e.g. Christianity based on trivial rules to blindly follow), closest to [nonviolence](nonviolence.md), [socialism](socialism.md) and true [science](science.md) (e.g. [Buddhism](buddhism.md)). There is no question about the intelligence of Jews, the greatest thinkers of all times were Jewish ([Richard Stallman](rms.md), [Einstein](einstein.md), [Marx](marx.md), Freud, [Chomsky](chomsky.md), Christophe Colomb, even [Jesus](jesus.md) and others) -- the man often regarded as the smartest human in history, William James Sidis, was a Jew. Jews have dominated despite being a minority, they seem to have a very creative intelligence and some of them decide to gain further edge by giving up their morality (i.e. becoming [capitalist](capitalism.md)), while Asians are more disciplined and mechanically inclined -- they can learn a skill and bring it to perfection with an extremely deep study and dedication (funnily this observation was also shared e.g. by Grubby, a Warcraft III legend pro player, on a stream ranking Orc units, where he contrasted the Asian mechanical genius with European creative thinking, swiftly realizing the politically incorrect slip and playing it to the out). Closely following is the general white race (which according to studies is also seen as most physically attractive by all races): white people have of course absolutely dominated history and there is always that one white guy at the top even in areas more dominated by other races (e.g. Eminem in rap, Carlsen in chess, Grubby in Warcraft 3, ...), however whites are still primitive in many ways ([individualism](individualism.md), [fascism](fascism.md), violence, simple religions and cults, e.g. that of economy, money, simplified commandments of Christianity etc.). The African black race known as the *negro* is one of the least intelligent according to basically all literature -- this makes a lot of sense, the race has been oppressed and living in harsh conditions for centuries and millennia and didn't get much chance to evolve towards good performance in intellectual tasks, quite the opposite, those who were physically fit rather than smart were probably more likely to survive and reproduce as slaves or jungle people (even if white people split from the blacks relatively recently, a rapid change in environment also leads to a rapid change in evolution, even that of intelligence). However the more primitive, less intelligent races (blacks, indians etc.) were found by some to e.g. have significantly faster reaction times, which sometimes may be an advantage -- this is suspected to be cause be a tradeoff; the "smarter" races perform more complex processing of input information (in terms of computers: having a longer processing [pipeline](pipeline.md)) and so it takes longer, i.e. the more primitive individual acts more impulsively and therefore quicker. The 1892 book *Hereditary Genius* says that the black race is *about two grades* below the white race (nowadays the gap will most likely be lower). Hispanics were found to perform somewhere in between the white and black people. There isn't so much info about other races such as the red race or Eskimos, but they're probably similarly intelligent to the black race. The above mentioned book *Hereditary Genius* gives an intelligence of the Australian aboriginal race *at least one grade below that of the negro*, making possibly the dumbest race of all. The brown races are kind of complicated, Indian people have Asian genes and showed a great intellectual potential, e.g. in [chess](chess.md), [math](math.md), philosophy (nonviolence inherently connected to India is the most intellectually advanced philosophy), and lately also [computer science](compsci.md) (even though many would argue that "[pajeets](pajeet.md)" are just trained coding monkeys, really their compsci "universities" are mostly a meme); they may be at the similar level to Hispanics.
|
||||
|
||||
Increasing multiculturalism, globalization and mixing of the races will likely make all of this less and less relevant as time goes on -- races will blend greatly which may either help get rid of true [racism](racism.md), but also fuel it: many will oppose racial mixing, many will become more paranoid (as is already the case with Jews who are sometimes very hard to tell apart from whites) and eventually pure races will actually become a minority that may become target of reversed racism: a pale white guy in a room full of mixed people will stand out and likely get lynched (if not just for the fact of being different, then for social revenge). For now the differences in races are still greatly visible.
|
||||
Increasing multiculturalism, globalization and mixing of the races will likely make all of this less and less relevant as time goes on -- races will blend greatly which may either help get rid of true [racism](racism.md), but also fuel it: many will oppose racial mixing, many will become more paranoid (as is already the case with Jews who are sometimes very hard to tell apart from whites) and eventually pure races will actually become a minority that may become target of reverse racism: a pale white guy in a room full of mixed people will stand out and likely get lynched (if not just for the fact of being different, then for social revenge). For now the differences between races are still highly visible and significant.
|
||||
|
||||
[LRS](lrs.md) philosophy is of course FOR multiculturalism and mixing of races -- we just hope the situation won't escalate as described above. Biodiversity is good.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
3554
random_page.md
3554
random_page.md
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load diff
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
WARNING: The article contains a lot of comparisons to [Nazism](nazi.md).
|
||||
|
||||
Transsexualism (*transsexual* being shortened to just *trans*) is a [disease](disease.md) that makes someone extremely strongly desire to be the opposite [sex](sex.md) than he was born, to the point of it becoming a cause of deep [depression](depression.md), self harm and [suicidal](suicide.md) tendencies. Transsexuals are also colloquially called *trannies*; there are many other terms such as a *shemale*, *trap*, *t-girl*, *m2f* (male to female), *f2m* (female to male) and so on. Transsexual is not to be confused with a transvestite (someone who just dresses as the other sex, e.g. as part of a fetish or public show).
|
||||
Transsexualism (also *trannyism*, *transsexual* being shortened to just *trans*) is a [disease](disease.md) which makes someone very strongly desire to be the opposite [sex](sex.md) than he was born, to the point of it becoming a cause of deep [depression](depression.md), self harm and [suicidal](suicide.md) tendencies. Transsexuals are also colloquially called *trannies*; there are many other terms such as a *shemale*, *trap*, *t-girl*, *m2f* (male to female), *f2m* (female to male) and so on. Transsexual is not to be confused with a transvestite (someone who just dresses as the other sex, e.g. as part of a fetish or public show), hermaphrodite etc.
|
||||
|
||||
{ A personal comment: maybe 50% of my online friends are transsexual, many of them among the best people I've ever met, I really deeply love them and some of them I got really, really close with. They really do suffer immensely and it breaks my heart. Really I don't care about what people want to be, it's fine to be whoever or whatever you want. I don't pretend I enjoy the sight of a man with lipstick on, walking around in schoolgirl clothes, but that's fine too, I also dislike seeing people in suits, with tattoos and many other things -- as a grown up adult I can bear seeing things I don't exactly love and I can get over them easily. What I talk about here is harmful and dangerous fascist identity politics. Don't let politicians divide us, we can love each other even despite disagreements and different tastes, don't let them tell you that if you oppose their politics you automatically also support a genocide of all transsexuals. That's some Nazi level of brainwashing. ~drummyfish }
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ Is it OK to be German? Yes, of course, Is it OK to be a [Nazi](nazi.md)? No, tha
|
|||
|
||||
Hopefully that's enough examples to demonstrate the difference. Really you must see it even if with a quarter of average [IQ](iq.md), only extreme brainwashing can possibly make you not see the difference. You know this is the voice of reason and you know tranny fascism is a voice of cult, you know listening to one means doing the right thing and listening to the other doing the cowardly conformance to evil. You can choose to be good or evil.
|
||||
|
||||
**Why are there suddenly so many transsexuals?** And why are 99.99% of them male to female? Well, again, some of them are legit, but these are extremely rare (and remember, they suffer by this sudden transsexual boom as well, their illness is being milked and abused). The reasons for the sudden trans explosion are for example the following:
|
||||
**Why are there suddenly so many transsexuals?** And why are 99.99% of them male to female? Again, please note that we aren't talking about individuals but rather about masses of people, social phenomena and political groups -- yes, there are malicious individuals just pretending to be trans, but most are probably genuinely feeling it, and though it's unfortunate because it's a burden for them, we will accept them, we won't ever hate them for being trans -- we are however trying to figure out WHY more and more people suffer from this and then try to see how to make it not be so. With that said, the reasons for the sudden trans explosion are probably following:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Extreme brainwashing at very young age.** Imagine you are 8 or 10 years old and all you do all day is watch transsexual YouTubers, ads, cartoons with transsexual characters, movies with transsexual heroes, you see transsexual marching in streets under transsexual flags, you see them in games you play, just everywhere. In complete honesty, what do you think you will want to become? Children don't think critically, they just accept whatever role models are put in front of them. They see Pokemon, they want to be a Pokemon trainer, they see batman, they want to be a batman. LGBT fascists know this very well and exploit it to full extent. Many lives are ruined at a very young age, many will end up committing [suicides](suicide.md). Is it even possible to imagine anything more evil?
|
||||
- **It is a [fashion](fashion.md).** Very simple, it IS a fashion to be gay, sissy, transsexual, mentally ill and "queer". Just like everyone was a disco fan in the [80s](80s.md) and like everyone was an [emo](emo.md) in 2000s, is it surprising at all that young people follow a fashion? If you're straight, with no mental illness, no self harm scars, wearing normal clothes, you are just plain and simple BORING, unpopular, won't ever have sex, friends and may even become bullied. Do you in your right mind think anyone young ever wants this? However the trans fashion has a catch: it comes with serious irreversible decisions, such as that to have your dick cut off, often made at a time when you don't even know how children are made yet.
|
||||
- **Many social rewards.** For example: **label of a [hero](hero_culture.md)** for coming out; attention, which means followers, fame and **financial rewards** on social media; more potential for generating drama, i.e. again more attention capital, meaning more money etc.; **better chances to get hired** as companies have quotas to hire minorities and similar kinds of people and they're generally scared of discrimination lawsuits; **safety** from getting bullied by [LGBT](lgbt.md), [feminists](feminism.md) and other pseudoleftist fascist groups for having joined their ranks (just like "communist" collaborators used to get an immunity, protection and privileges for signing collaboration with the "communist" party); **better chances in lawsuits** as you gain the powerful "discrimination card" to play (and as a result even lowering probability of getting sued at all); support, compassion and empathy of your surroundings for having an "illness"; excuse for behaving badly ("he is ill, it's not his fault"), healthcare benefits such as a disability pension; business opportunities, e.g. for being a writer, speaker etc. Is it surprising at all that when something is socially rewarded, people start doing it? You would have to be stupid beyond any measure to even find this surprising in a slightest way.
|
||||
- Males get minus points from feminism, females get plus points, therefore more people want to be female.
|
||||
- Herd mentality, mass hysteria. People just [do what others do](everyone_does_it.md) without thinking because they're stupid, spreading this further and further.
|
||||
- Herd mentality, mass hysteria. People just [do what others do](monkey_see_monkey_do.md) without thinking because they're stupid, spreading this further and further.
|
||||
- Females that that made the huge mistake of transitioning to a male very quickly find life as a male is much more difficult, contrary to what feminist propaganda told them, and they quickly revert back.
|
||||
- ...
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
|||
# Unfuck
|
||||
|
||||
Unfucking [software](sw.md) (or another piece of [technology](tech.md)) means taking said software and adjusting it to better comply with [less retarded software](lrs.md), i.e. *fixing it*. Doing so may be an effective way to obtain good software without having to [write it from scratch](reinventing_the_wheel.md), but, indeed, a few prerequisites have to be met: for example the software will likely have to be [free (as in freedom)](free_software.md) (so that we can [fork](fork.md) it) and the energy invested into "fixing it" mustn't exceed the reinventing energy.
|
||||
Unfucking an already existing [software](sw.md) (or another piece of [technology](tech.md)) means taking said software and adjusting it to better comply with [less retarded software](lrs.md), i.e. *fixing it*. Doing so may be an efficient way to obtain good software without having to [write it from scratch](reinventing_the_wheel.md), but, indeed, a few prerequisites have to be met: for example the software will likely have to be [free (as in freedom)](free_software.md) (so that we can [fork](fork.md) it) and the energy invested into "fixing it" mustn't exceed the reinventing energy.
|
||||
|
||||
Unfucking software may involve for example the following:
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
|||
# Unretard
|
||||
|
||||
Unretarding means aligning oneself with the *less retarded [software](lrs.md) and [society](less_retarded_society.md)* after acquiring necessary education and mindset. This [wiki](lrs_wiki.md) should help achieve this goal.
|
||||
Unretarding means aligning oneself with the *less retarded [software](lrs.md) and [society](less_retarded_society.md)* after acquiring necessary education and mindset. This [wiki](lrs_wiki.md) should help with achieving the goal.
|
||||
|
||||
Nowadays unretarding is almost synonymous to learning to live and think in exact opposite ways we have been taught to by [modern](modern.md) society.
|
||||
These days unretarding is almost a synonym to learning to live and think in exact opposite ways we have been taught to by [modern](modern.md) society. What you've been told is good is in fact bad, what they call love is hate and vice versa. Not always but mostly it is so.
|
||||
|
||||
## See Also
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
130
wiki_stats.md
130
wiki_stats.md
|
|
@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
|
|||
This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
|
||||
|
||||
- number of articles: 601
|
||||
- number of commits: 900
|
||||
- total size of all texts in bytes: 4444196
|
||||
- total number of lines of article texts: 33809
|
||||
- number of commits: 901
|
||||
- total size of all texts in bytes: 4451454
|
||||
- total number of lines of article texts: 33824
|
||||
- number of script lines: 294
|
||||
- occurrences of the word "person": 9
|
||||
- occurrences of the word "nigger": 98
|
||||
|
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ longest articles:
|
|||
- [c](c.md): 44K
|
||||
- [programming_language](programming_language.md): 44K
|
||||
- [3d_model](3d_model.md): 40K
|
||||
- [woman](woman.md): 36K
|
||||
- [woman](woman.md): 40K
|
||||
- [bloat](bloat.md): 36K
|
||||
- [internet](internet.md): 36K
|
||||
- [main](main.md): 36K
|
||||
|
|
@ -35,60 +35,91 @@ longest articles:
|
|||
|
||||
top 50 5+ letter words:
|
||||
|
||||
- which (2500)
|
||||
- there (1919)
|
||||
- people (1743)
|
||||
- example (1514)
|
||||
- other (1380)
|
||||
- number (1258)
|
||||
- which (2503)
|
||||
- there (1921)
|
||||
- people (1751)
|
||||
- example (1516)
|
||||
- other (1382)
|
||||
- number (1259)
|
||||
- about (1217)
|
||||
- software (1203)
|
||||
- program (988)
|
||||
- because (952)
|
||||
- their (932)
|
||||
- would (915)
|
||||
- being (853)
|
||||
- something (850)
|
||||
- called (845)
|
||||
- because (956)
|
||||
- their (935)
|
||||
- would (918)
|
||||
- being (860)
|
||||
- something (851)
|
||||
- called (846)
|
||||
- language (844)
|
||||
- things (840)
|
||||
- things (842)
|
||||
- numbers (808)
|
||||
- simple (792)
|
||||
- simple (794)
|
||||
- computer (771)
|
||||
- without (746)
|
||||
- without (747)
|
||||
- programming (728)
|
||||
- function (714)
|
||||
- different (704)
|
||||
- these (701)
|
||||
- however (694)
|
||||
- these (702)
|
||||
- however (696)
|
||||
- system (663)
|
||||
- world (650)
|
||||
- should (633)
|
||||
- doesn (631)
|
||||
- world (651)
|
||||
- should (634)
|
||||
- doesn (632)
|
||||
- while (623)
|
||||
- point (612)
|
||||
- games (606)
|
||||
- still (596)
|
||||
- society (594)
|
||||
- drummyfish (582)
|
||||
- games (607)
|
||||
- still (598)
|
||||
- society (595)
|
||||
- drummyfish (589)
|
||||
- simply (574)
|
||||
- using (573)
|
||||
- simply (572)
|
||||
- possible (566)
|
||||
- possible (567)
|
||||
- though (557)
|
||||
- similar (541)
|
||||
- course (540)
|
||||
- similar (539)
|
||||
- https (536)
|
||||
- memory (528)
|
||||
- always (517)
|
||||
- always (519)
|
||||
- value (510)
|
||||
- technology (508)
|
||||
- really (503)
|
||||
- probably (502)
|
||||
- basically (501)
|
||||
- really (505)
|
||||
- probably (504)
|
||||
- basically (502)
|
||||
|
||||
latest changes:
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
Date: Mon Oct 14 20:53:01 2024 +0200
|
||||
3d_rendering.md
|
||||
deferred_shading.md
|
||||
disease.md
|
||||
doom.md
|
||||
drummyfish.md
|
||||
duke3d.md
|
||||
fail_ab.md
|
||||
game_engine.md
|
||||
geek.md
|
||||
langtons_ant.md
|
||||
line.md
|
||||
linux.md
|
||||
main.md
|
||||
markov_chain.md
|
||||
minimalism.md
|
||||
often_confused.md
|
||||
operating_system.md
|
||||
people.md
|
||||
physics_engine.md
|
||||
public_domain.md
|
||||
race.md
|
||||
random_page.md
|
||||
raycasting.md
|
||||
steve_jobs.md
|
||||
sw_rendering.md
|
||||
tool_slave.md
|
||||
transsexual.md
|
||||
wiki_pages.md
|
||||
wiki_stats.md
|
||||
woman.md
|
||||
Date: Sun Oct 13 16:12:09 2024 +0200
|
||||
90s.md
|
||||
avpd.md
|
||||
|
|
@ -97,31 +128,6 @@ Date: Sun Oct 13 16:12:09 2024 +0200
|
|||
nokia.md
|
||||
random_page.md
|
||||
soyence.md
|
||||
steve_jobs.md
|
||||
wiki_pages.md
|
||||
wiki_stats.md
|
||||
wizard.md
|
||||
woman.md
|
||||
Date: Sat Oct 12 16:21:03 2024 +0200
|
||||
chess.md
|
||||
czechia.md
|
||||
drummyfish.md
|
||||
iq.md
|
||||
jokes.md
|
||||
left_right.md
|
||||
minimalism.md
|
||||
nationalism.md
|
||||
npc.md
|
||||
random_page.md
|
||||
raycasting.md
|
||||
steve_jobs.md
|
||||
tool_slave.md
|
||||
tranny_software.md
|
||||
transsexual.md
|
||||
wiki_pages.md
|
||||
wiki_stats.md
|
||||
wiki_tldr.md
|
||||
Date: Fri Oct 11 19:48:53 2024 +0200
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
most wanted pages:
|
||||
|
|
@ -149,9 +155,9 @@ most wanted pages:
|
|||
|
||||
most popular and lonely pages:
|
||||
|
||||
- [lrs](lrs.md) (308)
|
||||
- [lrs](lrs.md) (309)
|
||||
- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (253)
|
||||
- [c](c.md) (229)
|
||||
- [c](c.md) (230)
|
||||
- [bloat](bloat.md) (219)
|
||||
- [free_software](free_software.md) (187)
|
||||
- [game](game.md) (144)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue