drummyfish/less_retarded_wiki
5
2
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Update

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Miloslav Ciz 2024-12-17 15:08:40 +01:00
parent 69630c448e
commit 80d186311f
9 changed files with 1868 additions and 1849 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

40
calculus.md
View file

@ -50,6 +50,8 @@ Now listen up, here comes the truth about calculus. Doing it correctly and preci
*Graph showing a function (`x`), its derivative (`*`) and (one of) its integral(s) (`#`).*
The basics of calculus aren't that hard, however it can go deeper and deeper and one can probably dedicate whole life just to learning more and more; as you learn the basic derivatives and integrals, you move on to multidimensional calculus, vector calculus, integrating over curves and surfaces, various esoteric methods of analytical and numerical integration etcetc.
## Derivative
Derivative finds how **quickly a function grows** at any given point. DOING derivatives is called **differentiation** (confusingly because differential is a term distinct from derivative). Since derivative and integral are opposite operations, one would assume they'd be equally difficult to handle, but no, derivative is the **easier** part! So it's always taught first. It's kind of like multiplication and division -- multiplication is a bit easier (division has remainders, undefined division by zero etc.).
@ -162,16 +164,20 @@ As already claimed in the section on derivative, integrating is **more difficult
- There is no simple [algorithm](algorithm.md) for integrating general function (only for some specific cases) and many functions do NOT have analytical solutions at all! I.e. while we can make a derivative of any (differentiable) function by just following simple rules, getting an integral of a function is often a matter of trial and error, integrating is kind of [art](art.md) that has to be learned. This may come as a surprise but it is so, it is similar to how for example factoring a number is much more difficult than multiplying the factors back.
- Unlike with derivatives there are infinitely many integrals of given function because functions that only differ by an added constant will give the same derivative (for example the functions *f(x) = x* and *f(x) = x + 1* will both have the same derivative) -- so when we're integrating we always get function that has a variable additive constant in it.
- Integrals don't have some nice mathematical properties that derivatives have, so we can't assume as much, for example a derivative of an elementary function is always elementary function but this is not the case for an integral. { At least I think :) ~drummyfish }
- Integrals don't have some nice mathematical properties that derivatives have, so we can't assume as much, for example a derivative of an elementary function is always elementary function (the set of elementary functions is closed under differentiation) but this is not the case for an integral.
- Integrating a function makes it more complex (e.g. the exponents of variables increase), unlike with derivatives where we are simplifying the function.
- Integrals don't usually make sense at single points, they are related to [intervals](interval.md). While with derivatives it's completely fine to ask "what's the derivative of this function at this single point", with integrals we always have to as "what's the integral between points A and B".
- As a consequence of the previous point there are TWO types of integrals: definite and indefinite.
- Related to the previous point is also the fact that derivative is basically a local operator concerned only with a single point and a small area around it, while integral is accumulating information over a bigger area, i.e. it's more complex in that we have to consider the function more globally.
- As another consequence of the non-local properties of integral there are actually TWO types of integrals: definite and indefinite.
- There exist quite simple functions that simply don't have an analytical solution (for example *sin(x)/x*).
So due to these complications we now yet have to explain the two different types of integrals:
- **indefinite integral**: This is the FUNCTION we get by performing integration, i.e. result of indefinite integral is a mathematical expression with variables in it. In fact this expression represents an infinite set of functions because it always has the additive constant *C* in it (like hinted above) -- we can kind of ignore this for now. The important gist is this: indefinite integral kind of gives us a general FORMULA that can further be used to compute definite integrals. For example an indefinite integral of function *f(x) = 1* will be *x + C*. In practice the result we are searching is often a definite integral (a single value), but to compute that we have to start by computing the indefinite integral.
- **indefinite integral**: This is the FUNCTION we get by performing integration, i.e. result of indefinite integral is a mathematical expression with variables in it. In fact this expression represents an infinite set of functions because it always has the additive constant *C* in it (like hinted above) -- we can kind of ignore this for now. The important gist is this: indefinite integral kind of gives us a general FORMULA that can further be used to compute definite integrals. For example an indefinite integral of function *f(x) = 1* will be *x + C*. In practice the result we are searching is often a definite integral (a single value), but to compute that we have to start by computing the indefinite integral. However it's also very hard to calculate indefinite integrals -- they are the precise solution and holy grail of integration but in practice we can't always get them and have to resort to approximations.
- **definite integral**: This is a single [NUMBER](number.md) which (applying the geometric interpretation of integral) tells us the AREA below the function graph (with area below zero counting as negative) over some specific INTERVAL, i.e. between two given points A and B. This means that definite integral doesn't give us an expression but rather a quantity. For example a definite integral of function *f(x) = 1* over interval [0,1] will give us 1 (imagine the graph: the area is simply that of a square with side 1). Definite integrals are computed from the indefinite integral by plugging the upper interval number into the indefinite integral (in the place of the variable), then plugging the lower interval number, and then subtracting the latter from the former. With numeric methods (computer integration) we always only get definite integrals (and actually only their approximate values) -- the computer here skips computing the indefinite integral (as that's hard) and rather like a dumb machine LITERALLY goes by small steps and computes the area below the function graph. Small note to this: the computer still can draw a graph of a function's integral by plotting definite integral value for interval 0 to *x* for every plotted *x* because when we think about it, the indefinite integral kind of gives us a function of how an indefinite integral grows; so the computer can give us a picture of a graph but it generally cannot give us an analytically computed formula of indefinite integral.
Fun fact: before digital computers engineers used very clever methods to find definite integrals of general functions. [Analog](analog.md) computers were particularly good at integrating, their continuous nature makes them a quite elegant solution to the problem, however perhaps even more genius method in its [simplicity](kiss.md) was the following: the engineer would draw the function he wanted to integrate on a sheet of paper, then cut it out and simply weight its mass -- this would give him the fraction of the weight of the whole sheet of paper and so also the fraction of the area below the function graph.
**Example**: we will now try to make an indefinite integral of the function:
*f(x) = 2 * x - 2*
@ -184,18 +190,6 @@ Now for the **notation**: the symbol for integral is kind of a big italic *S* ([
**Wait dude WHAT THE FUCK is this dx shit at the end?** This question is expected. Look: it has to do with the theory behind what the integral mathematically means, for starters one can just ignore it and remember that integral starts with *I*, then the integrated function follows, and then there is *dx* at the end. But to give a bit of explanation: firstly notice the *dx* tells us what the integrated variable is -- usually we have a function with single variable *x* and so it's pretty clear, but once we move to more dimensions we'll have more variables and this *dx* tells us what is a variable (i.e. along which axis we are integrating) and what is to be treated as a constant (maybe this doesn't yet make much sense but with integration there is a big difference between a variable and a constant, even if they are both represented by a letter). The real reason for *dx* is that the integral really represents an **infinite sum**. Have you ever seen that big sigma symbol for a sum? The integral symbol (here *I*) is like this, it likewise says "make an infinite sum of what will follow". But if we take a function and make infinitely many steps and keep summing the values the function gives us, we will just get [infinity](infinity.md) as the sum, so something is missing. In fact we don't want to sum the function values but rather areas of "tiny strips" we are kind of drawing below the function graph -- now a strip is basically a rectangle: area of a rectangle is computed as its height times its width. Height of the rectangle is the function value (here *2 * x - 2*) and width is *dx*, which represents the "infinitely narrow" interval. This is just to give some idea about WHY it looks like this, but it's cool to ignore it for now.
Here are some rules for integration:
| *f(x)* | *I f(x) dx* | comment |
| -------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ---------- |
| *a * x^n* | *a * (x^(n+1))/(n+1) + C* | |
| *cos(x)* | *sin(x) + C* | |
| *sin(x)* | *-cos(x) + C* | |
| *e^x* | *e^x + C* | |
| *1/x* | *log(x) + C* | |
| *a * g(x) + b * h(x)*| *a * (I g(x) dx) + b * (I h(x) dx) + C* | |
| *g(x) * h(x)* | *g(x) * (I h(x) dx) - (I g'(x) * (I h(x) dx) dx) + C* | per partes |
So now the fuck we can finally move on. Our integral is really easy because it's just a sum of two expressions (and an integral of a sum thankfully equals a sum of integrals) that can be integrated easily. So from the rule *I x^N dx = x^(N + 1) / (N + 1)* we deduce that integral of *2 * x* is *2 * x^2 / 2 = x^2* and integral of *-2* is *-2 * x*, so we get:
*I (2 * x - 2) dx = x^2 - 2 * x + C*
@ -213,14 +207,26 @@ Now let's finish with computing a definite integral, OK? Let's say we want to co
Above we said this is done by computing indefinite integral (already done), then plugging the upper and lower bound and subtracting, so let's do it:
*I(0,1) (2 * x - 2) dx = (1^3 - 2 * 1 + C) - (0^3 - 2 * 0 + C) = -1*
*I(0,1) (2 * x - 2) dx = (1^2 - 2 * 1 + C) - (0^2 - 2 * 0 + C) = -1*
Things to notice here:
- The constants *C* nicely subtract and disappear, and they always will, so we don't have to worry about assigning them any values or stuff like that.
- The area we got is negative and its absolute size is 1, does this make sense? YES. Take a look at the graph of the function *2 * x - 2* up above and pay attention to the interval 0 to 1. The function's value is below zero and we said that area below zero will be negative, so this checks out. Also we can see that geometrically the size of the area is a half of a rectangle of height 2 and width 1, which is exactly 1. So all in all we're cool.
TODO: the rules
For completeness here are some rules for integration:
| *f(x)* | *I f(x) dx* | comment |
| -------------------- | ----------------------------------------------------- | ---------- |
| *a * x^n* | *a * (x^(n+1))/(n+1) + C* | |
| *cos(x)* | *sin(x) + C* | |
| *sin(x)* | *-cos(x) + C* | |
| *e^x* | *e^x + C* | |
| *1/x* | *log(x) + C* | |
| *a * g(x) + b * h(x)*| *a * (I g(x) dx) + b * (I h(x) dx) + C* | |
| *g(x) * h(x)* | *g(x) * (I h(x) dx) - (I g'(x) * (I h(x) dx) dx) + C* | per partes |
However note that applying these rules is generally not so simple as with differentiation, there exist methods such as *per partes* or *substitution* that don't tell you exactly how or when to apply them, so you have to experiment -- like said, this is an entertainment left to those who just enjoy doing math.
**Can we do higher order integrals and partial integrals?** Yes, of course, just like with derivatives we can do both of these.

7
faq.md
View file

@ -58,6 +58,13 @@ A forum, mailing list or something would possibly be nice, so far I've only expe
Do I look like a fucking degenerated [zoomer](zoomer.md)?
### I am a furry transsexual gay zoomer and/or capitalist etc., do you hate me?
NO, I do not hate you at all! In fact most of my best online friends normally fall into some of the listed categories, don't let the propaganda convince you we can't be friends. We can be good friends despite liking or being something the other one dislikes, it only means that we are different, but why should we be enemies? Even if we don't end up being besties I will never hate you personally, my life philosophy is based on loving everyone unconditionally, I will possibly only hate and criticize things you do or want to do or trends you follow, but I will never want to have anyone executed or put in prison or punished in any way, it's literally us having different opinions on something and that's that.
There is one thing to add: from my experience I have hard time making friends with capitalists -- it's not that I wouldn't want to, I usually try, but I find our basic life values just end up being completely contradictory and hence we cannot find a topic to discuss without constantly disagreeing and feeling tension all the time, so just be aware of this, but feel free to talk to me anytime if you really want to, I'll be glad to hear from you.
### Why the angry and aggressive tone, can't you write in a nicer way, especially when you advocate love etc.?
More than once I've been told that someone was initially afraid to talk to me because I write in this "aggressive/angry" way. I am sorry, this way of writing has its reasons that I established here and it's what works for me, I really don't intend to stress you out -- firstly this is how I internally think because yes, I am very frustrated, and **I want this wiki to capture my internal thoughts in a very unfiltered way** (note that having bad thoughts doesn't mean one has to act on them), also I find this way flows the best for me and allows me to communicate what I feel and think the best, and it also gives this wiki kind of its own "personality" and prevents it from taking on a super serious tone -- informality and fun are quite important for a healthy view of the world. I am really tired of all the overly correct and polite articles on the Internet (I have tried to write in different ways but it always stands in the way). Sometimes I get mood swings and regret writing something, other times I bash myself for being too soft -- but I don't want to delete stuff too much, this will all be reflected on the wiki. Underneath all this still lies the important message of **love and peace**. I guess I also want to show that to be truly loving you don't have to change your personality or censor your thoughts. In normal conversations I try as much as possible to be nice, I actually almost never get aggressive towards others, if I get very stressed I usually just leave or in more extreme cases target hate towards myself, but I really try to not hurt anyone (people also told me they were quite surprised that I was kind of "nice" when they actually talked to me). I actually have a lot of trouble in real life for not defending myself, people often abuse it and I let them, I don't fight back, I don't believe in revenge or violence and in addition I have social anxiety. Please don't be afraid to contact me <3

2
hexadecimal.md
View file

@ -34,4 +34,6 @@ The conversions work as in any other base, basically just remember this: *N*th d
Some **[funny](fun.md) hexadecimal values** that are also [English](english.md) words at the same time and which you may include in your programs for the [lulz](lulz.md) include: `abba`, `ace`, `add`, `babe`, `bad`, `be`, `bee`, `beef`, `cab`, `cafe`, `dad`, `dead`, `deaf`, `decade`, `facade`, `face`, `fee`, `feed`. You may also utilize digits here (see also [leet](leet.md), recall the famous number `80085` that looks like `BOOBS`); `0` = `O`, `1` = `I`/`l`, `2` = `Z`, `4` = `A` (already available though), `5` = `S`, `6` = `G`, `8` = `B` (also already available). Then you get many more words, for example `0b5e55ed`, `0be5e`, `0ff1c1a1`, `101`, `105e`, `1061ca1`, `16100`, `1ad1e5`, `1dea1`, `1e6a1`, `2e1da`, `5a661e5`, `5c1f1`, `50c10b101061ca1`, `60061e`, `600d`, `600fed`, `601d`, `601f`, `60d`, `6a55`, `a1d5`, `a55`, `a5c11`, `a5oc1a1`, `ac1d`, `acce551b1e`, `ad01f`, `b00b1e5`, `b00b5`, `b055`, `b0d1e5`, `b100d`, `b101061ca1`, `b10b`, `b1a5ed`, `b1ade`, `b1e55ed`, `ba115`, `ba5ed`, `bad6e`, `bada55`, `c001`, `c0de`, `c10aca`, `c1a551f1ed`, `ca6ed`, `cab1e`, `caca0`, `d06`, `d15ab1ed`, `d15ea5e`, `d1a106`, `d1ab10`, `ed1b1e`, `f001`, `f00d`, `f1a6`, `f1dd1e`, `f1ea5`, `fa151f1ab1e`, `fa6`, `faece5`, `f06` etc.
## See Also
- [binary](binary.md)

8
npc.md
View file

@ -1,11 +1,15 @@
# NPC
NPC (non-player character) is a character in a video [game](game.md) that's not controlled by a player but rather by [AI](ai.md). NPC is also used as a term for people in [real life](irl.md) that exhibit low [intelligence](iq.md) and just behave in accordance with the system.
NPC (non-player character) is a character in a video [game](game.md) that's not controlled by a player but rather by [AI](ai.md); the term has now came to also be used for people in [real life](irl.md) that exhibit high conformance and rather low [intelligence](iq.md) which allows them to choose to live in blissful ignorance. Vast majority of people in our society are NPCs with brain programmed by the system so that they form an army that keeps sustaining the system. Such people are also often called normies or [blue pilled](blue_pill.md): they have mainstream opinions, [react only to keywords](shortcut_thinking.md), use mainstream technology, obediently [consume](consumerism.md), don't make much trouble and follow the lined up path through life (school, career, family, retirement). Sometimes they perceive themselves as rebels, [geeks](geek.md), noncomformists and freethinkers for deviating from the mainstream in tiny insignificant ways, such as by using [GNU](gnu.md)/[Linux](linux.md) (which they just call Linux) or for supporting mild [piracy](piracy.md) of abandonware games, but they are still NPCs (making an NPC feel like he does have free will is part of the system) -- to in fact stop being an NPC one unfortunately has to undergo a quite drastic [englightenment](unretard.md) that comes with life shattering realizations such as that we in fact do live in a nightmare and dystopia to which absolute majority of people (the NPCs) are completely blind, it means giving up or rethinking all the values one was taught and becoming a completely different man. This usually also leads to extreme social isolation, losing all friends, developing depression, losing social and sexual life, even falling in poverty and potentially attempting [suicide](suicide.md) (see also [red pill](red_pill.md) and [black pill](black_pill.md)) -- such is sadly the price for seeing the [truth](truth.md). It is scary, and in addition being an NPC is greatly rewarded by the system just like being a soldier is rewarded by the state: the system for example allows to compensate lack of talent with increased conformance -- even with average talent you will be able to achieve high success if you show above average conformity. And so under this great social pressure even the people who have the option to live as a non-NPC rather subconsciously choose to live in self deception and stay an NPC for life.
Those who are NPCs usually see non-NPCs as "right wing extremists", as all noncomformists are painted in the media. It's a form of modern [witch hunt](witch_hunt.md) and [fear culture](fear_culture.md) that the system has established to discredit and eliminate non-conformists and sustain the army of NPCs that it needs in place in order to survive. Of course it's in no way true that a non-NPC has to be a [Hitler](hitler.md) worshiping [rightist](left_right.md) or that he has to support violence and genocide or any similar kind of nonsense: in fact rightists are just fanatic [capitalist](capitalism.md) idiots. A non-NPC is simply someone who examines the world closely, objectively and through own eyes (as opposed to accepting what he's told) and discovers everything is wrong -- what he decides to do about this is then a completely individual choice. Some indeed do panic and let their animal instincts take over, becoming violent, seeking revenge and so on. Others -- like [us](lrs.md) -- just try to make things better by ACTUALLY refusing all kind of violence and advocating TRUE equality of people and unconditional [love](love.md) of all living beings -- however even this will be seen as extremism by NPCs because if we refuse to kill anyone, including the "enemies", we will of course consequently be labeled "supporters of the enemies", so there is no way out -- as a non-NPC you will never be able to make friends with an NPC no matter how hard you try, what values you hold and what actions you make, an NPC will always see you as a "right wing extremist fanatic" by the mere fact that you refuse to accept mainstream propaganda.
## See Also
- [blue pill](blue_pill.md)
- [normie](normie.md)
- [muggle](muggle.md)
- [tool slave](tool_slave.md)
- [nu-male](nu_male.md)
- [soydev](soydev.md)
- [soydev](soydev.md)
- [truth](truth.md)

4
phd.md
View file

@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
# PhD
PhD (also Ph.D., PhD. etc.), or *doctor of philosophy*, written after the name, is the highest academic degree that can be earned by being a student in [University](university.md), the basic title required for working as a [scientist](science.md) (nowadays more like [soyentist](soyence.md)). It is earned through many years of study and especially active publishing of original research that pushes the boundary of current human knowledge in a specific field. Despite being called doctor of *philosophy*, the title is awarded generally to scientists in basically any field such as [mathematics](math.md), [physics](physics.md), [psychology](psychology.md), [chemistry](chemistry.md) etc., NOT just to those studying [philosophy](philosophy.md). PhD is yet above [master's degree](masters_degree.md). It is a doctorate degree, so a holder of PhD is called a *doctor* (Dr.), just as those with other forms of doctorates such as medical doctorate or honorary doctorate; however PhD is the *big doctorate*, the kind of highest, most prestigious one. People with a PhD degree are considered the foremost experts, the smartest, most educated elite, as only about 1 to 2 % of population hold a PhD, though PhD is also often considered an overkill and an overqualification (there are many cases of people with PhD not mentioning it on their CVs because such a high education can actually be a disadvantage), and of course, as with everything under [capitalism](capitalism.md), PhDs became a thing of business and conformance, subject to corruption and degradation (there now even exist PhDs in [astrology](astrology.md), [gender studies](gender_studies.md) etc.), at times even a [meme](meme.md). PhD isn't what it used to be -- in the past a scientist was someone wise with a generally wide knowledge and also some sense of morality, nowadays a PhD absolutely doesn't come with anything like that -- **[today](21st_century.md) a PhD is simply a thinking machine**, extremely specialized in some very, VERY narrow field such as studying the front leg of some subspecies of some prehistoric bug; besides this narrow specialization PhD knows absolutely nothing about anything else (in this they are similar to highly trained [neural networks](neural_network.md) that perform superbly at one specific task like beating world chess championship but won't be able to add 3 plus 4). Yes, unless one is a minority or a [woman](woman.md), he still has to be somewhat smart and talented to obtain a PhD, but nowadays it's probably more about pouring an extreme amount of energy, slavery and conformance to the corrupt academic cults, so the prestige of the title comes for a pretty high price, one not worth paying. While the lower degrees demonstrate ability, PhD mostly demonstrated conformity added to ability.
PhD (also Ph.D., PhD. etc.), or *doctor of philosophy*, written after the name, is the highest academic degree that can be earned by being a student in [University](university.md), the basic title required for working as a [scientist](science.md) (nowadays more like [soyentist](soyence.md)). It is earned through many years of study and especially active publishing of original research that pushes the boundary of current human knowledge in a specific field. Despite being called doctor of *philosophy*, the title is awarded generally to scientists in basically any field such as [mathematics](math.md), [physics](physics.md), [psychology](psychology.md), [chemistry](chemistry.md) etc., NOT just to those studying [philosophy](philosophy.md). PhD is yet above [master's degree](masters_degree.md). It is a doctorate degree, so a holder of PhD is called a *doctor* (Dr.), just as those with other forms of doctorates such as medical doctorate or honorary doctorate; however PhD is the *big doctorate*, the kind of highest, most prestigious one. People with a PhD degree are considered the foremost experts, the smartest, most educated elite, as only about 1 to 2 % of population hold a PhD, though PhD is also often considered an overkill and an overqualification (there are many cases of people with PhD not mentioning it on their CVs because such a high education can actually be a disadvantage), and of course, as with everything under [capitalism](capitalism.md), PhDs became a thing of business and conformance, subject to corruption and degradation (there now even exist PhDs in [astrology](astrology.md), [gender studies](gender_studies.md) etc.), at times even a [meme](meme.md). PhD isn't what it used to be -- in the past a scientist was someone wise with a generally wide knowledge and also some sense of morality, nowadays a PhD absolutely doesn't come with anything like that -- **[today](21st_century.md) a PhD is simply a thinking machine**, extremely specialized in some very, VERY narrow field such as studying the front leg of some subspecies of some prehistoric bug; besides this narrow specialization PhD knows absolutely nothing about anything else (in this they are similar to highly trained [neural networks](neural_network.md) that perform superbly at one specific task like beating world chess championship but won't be able to add 3 plus 4). Yes, unless one is a minority or a [woman](woman.md), he still has to be somewhat smart and talented to obtain a PhD, but nowadays it's probably more about pouring an extreme amount of energy, slavery and conformance to the corrupt academic cults, so the prestige of the title comes for a pretty high price, one not worth paying. While the lower degrees demonstrate ability, PhD mostly demonstrated [conformity](npc.md) added to ability.
TODO
**As of 2024 the PhD degree is a [joke](joke.md)**, you can no longer see it as a proof of anything more than simply wanting to get PhD a lot -- it is possible to get PhD without being talented or smart, simply by showing high conformity, determination and willingness to do [soyentific](soyence.md) slavery. If one is rich it's probably possible to get the degree without even dedicating a lot of time and energy. There now exist PhDs in joke fields and from meme Universities. [Academia](academia.md) is dead and its degrees are just funny letters added to one's name.
**Should you get a PhD?** Unless you live in the past probably not -- as said the sacrifice required is enormous, to make it you should have a REAL GOOD reason, of which there aren't many -- perhaps if you REALLY want to be teacher at University or if for some twisted reason you want to spend your whole life in the corrupt toxic [soyence](soyence.md) environment trying to prove [women](woman.md) are better than men and sucking capitalist dicks so that they throw you a bit of money so that you can buy a microscope, then maybe. The thing is that focusing on PhD sucks away a great amount of energy you could spend on actually good things, consider that instead of actually programming [less retarded software](lrs.md) you will just have to do slavery for your dissertation advisor, do bureaucracy, p-value hacking, make powerpoint presentations, [marketing](marketing.md) for your research, give handjobs to sponsors, do bullshit research you dislike (because [publish or perish](publish_or_perish.md)), all while withstanding incredible amounts of stress and dodging depression. Really [masters_degree](masters_degree.md) is [enough](good_enough.md) to give you all you need for a rich intellectual life and being able to do good things, and it won't suck the soul out of your body. On the best universities even [bachelor's](bachelors_degree.md) is probably enough. If you REALLY wanna be the smartass guy who others ought to call a doctor, in some countries you may get some kinda small doctorate, usually just for an extra exam and paying some fee (e.g. RNDr, PHDr etc., details will depend on your country so check that out). { TFW just getting the EZ dentist degree so that you may call yourself a doctor :D ~drummyfish } Nowadays you can also just buy a honorary doctorate online, it's absolutely legal business, though you probably don't wanna support this kind of capitalist bullshit, you just pay them unholy money for a piece of paper.

2
programming.md
View file

@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Programming is the act, [science](science.md) and fine [art](art.md) of writing
You may also encounter the term [coding](coding.md) which is used by [noob](noob.md) [wannabe programmers](soydev.md), so called "coders" or [code monkeys](code_monkey.md). "Coding" doesn't reach the quality of programming, it is done in baby handholding languages like [Python](python.md), [JavaScript](javascript.md) or [Rust](rust.md) by people with very shallow knowledge of technology and its context, barely qualified to turn on a computer (like [jewtubers](youtube.md)), who have flooded the computer industry since it became lucrative. It is mostly done for money and/or creating an image for oneself. What they do is not real programming. Do not try to imitate them.
At high level programming becomes [spiritual](spirituality.md). Check out e.g. [zen](zen.md) and the famous [Tao of Programming](tao.md) (yes, it's kind of a [joke](jokes.md) but it's rooted in the reality of a common hacker's mindset, programming can truly be kind of a [meditation](meditation.md) and pursuit of enlightenment, often leading one to asking deeper questions about the world). Many people say that learning programming opens your eyes in a certain new way (with some however claiming the contrary that programming will rather close your eyes), you then see the world like never before (but that's probably kind of true of almost all skills taken to a high level so this may be a [shit](shit.md) statement). Others say too much programming cripples you mentally and gives you [autism](autism.md). Anyway it's [fun](fun.md) and changes you somehow. **Programming requires a good knowledge of advanced [math](math.md)**. Also probably at least above average [IQ](iq.md), as well as below average social intelligence. Being a [white](white.md) [man](man.md) is an advantage.
At high level programming becomes [spiritual](spirituality.md). Check out e.g. [zen](zen.md) and the famous [Tao of Programming](tao.md) (yes, it's kind of a [joke](jokes.md) but it's rooted in the reality of a common hacker's mindset, programming can truly be kind of a [meditation](meditation.md) and pursuit of enlightenment, often leading one to asking deeper questions about the world). Many people say that learning programming opens your eyes in a certain new way (with some however claiming the contrary that programming will rather close your eyes), you then see the world like never before (but that's probably kind of true of almost all skills taken to a high level so this may be a [shit](shit.md) statement). Others say too much programming cripples you mentally and gives you [autism](autism.md). Anyway it's [fun](fun.md) and changes you somehow. **Programming requires a good knowledge of advanced [math](math.md)**. Wanting to do programming without math is like wanting to do biology without chemistry. Programming also demands probably at least above average [IQ](iq.md), as well as below average social intelligence. Being a [white](white.md) [man](man.md) is an advantage.
**Can you do programming without math?** Short answer: no. Long answer: no, you can't.

3606
random_page.md
View file

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load diff

2
wiki_pages.md
View file

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

46
wiki_stats.md
View file

@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
- number of articles: 615
- number of commits: 945
- total size of all texts in bytes: 4839800
- total number of lines of article texts: 35587
- number of commits: 946
- total size of all texts in bytes: 4845391
- total number of lines of article texts: 35713
- number of script lines: 294
- occurrences of the word "person": 9
- occurrences of the word "nigger": 103
@ -38,23 +38,23 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
- which (2673)
- there (2102)
- people (1976)
- example (1657)
- example (1659)
- other (1517)
- about (1330)
- about (1331)
- number (1296)
- software (1234)
- because (1064)
- because (1065)
- their (1032)
- program (1021)
- would (1000)
- would (1002)
- something (961)
- being (953)
- things (926)
- language (915)
- called (893)
- simple (826)
- function (826)
- computer (821)
- function (833)
- simple (827)
- computer (823)
- numbers (818)
- without (808)
- different (761)
@ -65,18 +65,18 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
- system (699)
- doesn (681)
- should (678)
- still (669)
- still (670)
- games (657)
- while (652)
- point (642)
- while (653)
- point (644)
- drummyfish (635)
- society (631)
- simply (622)
- possible (610)
- using (601)
- using (603)
- probably (588)
- always (585)
- course (572)
- always (586)
- course (573)
- though (570)
- similar (570)
- https (565)
@ -89,6 +89,12 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
latest changes:
```
Date: Mon Dec 16 16:09:17 2024 +0100
calculus.md
random_page.md
wiki_pages.md
wiki_stats.md
work.md
Date: Sun Dec 15 20:50:53 2024 +0100
ashley_jones.md
binary.md
@ -116,12 +122,6 @@ Date: Sat Dec 14 16:25:29 2024 +0100
soyence.md
suicide.md
trolling.md
wiki_pages.md
wiki_stats.md
work.md
xxiivv.md
Date: Fri Dec 13 20:40:56 2024 +0100
90s.md
```
most wanted pages:
@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
- [lrs](lrs.md) (323)
- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (281)
- [c](c.md) (233)
- [c](c.md) (234)
- [bloat](bloat.md) (226)
- [free_software](free_software.md) (194)
- [game](game.md) (147)