Update

evil.md

@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ As [Richard Stallman](rms.md) says, **all evil does some good, which is never a
 
 If we consider evil to be that which is not restrained from amoral behavior, we conclude that in a [competitive](competition.md) system (such as [capitalism](capitalism.md)) evil always wins, simply because it's always in an advantage -- evil always has all possible options at hand to choose from, the amoral ones but also including the moral ones (evil will on occasion do good if it's in its interest), unlike good which limits itself to only choosing from morally sound options. It's like having two [chess](chess.md) players, one being limited by some further rules, for example only being able to take the opponent's pieces in self defense, not being able to attack first -- it is possible the disadvantaged player will win some games, but if they keep perpetually playing games over and over and reach about the same skill level, the disadvantage will inevitably make the crippled player to eventually be losing every single game. In other words good has tied hands, in a perpetual [fight](fight_culture.md) it will always fall behind and lose in the end. The only way for evil (as a form of behavior) to be eliminated is to establish a [non competitive system](less_retarded_society.md).
 
+Good cannot [win](win.md) against evil, fight itself is evil. But good is better than evil and we can choose good instead of evil.
+
 A famous quote states that:
 
 *"The only thing nec­es­sary for the tri­umph of evil is for good men to do noth­ing."*