Update

brain_software.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Primitive tools helping the brain compute, such as pen and paper  or printed out
 
 **Brain game** is brain software which is a [game](game.md), i.e. serves to entertain the user. This kind of brain software may be also very important, for example it can make being in prison more bearable and therefore makes an individual less afraid of prison.
 
-Example of brain software (and brain game) can be the [game](game.md) of [chess](chess.md). A chess master can easily play the game without a physical chess board, only in his head, and he can play games with someone else just by saying the moves out loud. He may even just play games with himself, which makes chess a deep, entertaining game that can be 100% contained in one's brain. Such game can never be taken away from the man, it can't be altered by [corporations](corporation.md), it can't become unplayable on new [hardware](hardware.md) etc., making it free to the greatest extent. Many other board games and pen and pencil games, such as [racetrack](racetrack.md) (pen and pencil racing game suitable for one or many players).
+Example of brain software (and brain game) can be the [game](game.md) of [chess](chess.md). A chess master can easily play the game without a physical chess board, only in his head, and he can play games with someone else just by saying the moves out loud. He may even just play games with himself, which makes chess a deep, entertaining game that can be 100% contained in one's brain. Such game can never be taken away from the man, it can't be altered by [corporations](corporation.md), it can't become unplayable on new [hardware](hardware.md) etc., making it free to the greatest extent. Many other board games and pen and pencil games, such as [racetrack](racetrack.md) (pen and pencil racing game suitable for one or many players). Some people also like solo roleplaying games, there exist ways to play [D&D](dungeons_and_dragons.md) style games solo using what's called a "game master emulator" (ways and rules to emulate actual human game master).
 
 [Math](math.md) is a kind of universal brain game -- when bored, one can simply think about some mathematical problem and try solving it as a challenge, potentially discovering new problems and making new discoveries along the way. It's like an infinite open world exploration game just in your head. Trying to make brain games may itself be an entertaining game.
 

calculus.md

@@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ Now listen up, here comes the truth about calculus. Doing it correctly and preci
 
 The basics of calculus aren't that hard, however it can go deeper and deeper and one can probably dedicate whole life just to learning more and more; as you learn the basic derivatives and integrals, you move on to multidimensional calculus, vector calculus, integrating over curves and surfaces, various esoteric methods of analytical and numerical integration etcetc.
 
+Calculus may also be considered advanced for the fact that -- [historically](history.md) speaking -- it's relatively "new", i.e. it took a long time to develop it and ancient and medieval civilizations existed without it despite otherwise having quite impressive math already. Of course precursors to calculus date very far back in history, parts of it and some special case problem were examined and solved, but it wasn't until 17th century when it was developed into a complete, general discipline. That happened thanks to Newton and Leibniz (they happened to develop it independently).
+
 ## Derivative
 
 Derivative finds how **quickly a function grows** at any given point. DOING derivatives is called **differentiation** (confusingly because differential is a term distinct from derivative). Since derivative and integral are opposite operations, one would assume they'd be equally difficult to handle, but no, derivative is the **easier** part! So it's always taught first. It's kind of like multiplication and division -- multiplication is a bit easier (division has remainders, undefined division by zero etc.).

data_hoarding.md

@@ -10,17 +10,19 @@ There is this famous case of a [woman](woman.md), Marion Stokes, who obsessively
 
 Here let be an advice to the good data hoarder.
 
-- As always: in general **minimize the [bad](bad.md), maximize the [good](good.md)**. Size, cost, [maintenance](maintenance.md), time, anxiety and other trouble are bad. Value of the data, its durability, independence, freedom etc. are good. **Know what and why you're doing it** -- you probably don't want to hoard famous Hollywood movies that you can pirate from 1000 sites at any time, there's no point in that, you want to save files so as to back them up, have them ready in case the Internet stops existing, save something that's likely to be censored and so on. Basically imagine the difference between someone collecting useful objects and someone filling his house up to the roof with complete junk -- the same kind of thing's happening with data.
+- As always: in general **minimize the [bad](bad.md), maximize the [good](good.md)**. Size, cost, [maintenance](maintenance.md), time, anxiety and other trouble are bad. Value of the data, its durability, independence, [freedom](freedom.md) etc. are good. **Know what and why you're doing it** -- you probably don't want to hoard famous Hollywood movies that you can pirate from 1000 sites at any time, there's no point in that, you want to save files so as to back them up, have them ready in case the Internet stops existing, save something that's likely to be censored and so on. Basically imagine the difference between someone collecting useful objects and someone filling his house up to the roof with complete junk -- the same kind of thing's happening with data.
-- **Collect small data of high value**, maximize the value/size ratio: typically save a lot of text data, vector images are fine too, be more picky with bitmap images and things like video always have to be considered extremely well, curated and edited to shrink their size. **Keeping your collection as small as possible is the number one priority** as the size is what makes the difference between having a pocket USB stick that can be quickly and easily backed up on any file sharing website or a CD vs maintaining a [RAID](raid.md) of backups, consuming new CPUs and spending most of your hoarding time just keeping your collection alive.
+- **Collect small data of high value**, maximize the value/size ratio: typically save a lot of text data, vector images are fine too, be more picky with bitmap images and things like video always have to be considered extremely well, curated and edited to shrink their size. **Keeping your collection as small as possible is the number one priority** as the size is what makes the difference between having a pocket USB stick that can be quickly and easily backed up on any file sharing website or a CD vs maintaining a [RAID](raid.md) of backups, consuming new [CPUs](cpu.md) and spending most of your hoarding time just keeping your collection alive.
 - **Hoard physical [books](books.md)** and similar oldschool data such as photos, vinyl records -- not only they often have advantages over electronic data, such as being storable without electricity and lasting longer, they are also usually of better quality and higher value. Internet data are full of junk and noise because it's a cheap medium -- a paper book on the other hand has to carefully choose what to include, i.e. it already did this part of the job for you.
-- **Use appropriate formats and quality**: if the value of the data is text, save it as txt (even if you found it in pdf), if it's a black and white scan, save it as black and white image (no need for RGB), if it's a diagram, find vector version of it and save that, if it's a meme whose entertaining value will be preserved even at half resolution, don't save it in 1080K resolution, save it at lowest acceptable quality etc. Use simple, common file formats that can be handled by free software, do NOT use proprietary formats or formats that are extremely complicated if you can at all avoid it. Go to great lengths to extract valuable data out of shitty formats: for example if you find a vlog video whose main value is in what's being said and not the video itself, rather find and store the video text transcript than the video itself (it takes much less space, can be searched, indexed, printed and backed up on paper, ...), or, as the next best thing, extract only audio and compress that so that it's just barely understandable.
+- **Use appropriate formats and quality**: if the value of the data is text, save it as txt (even if you found it in pdf), if it's a black and white scan, save it as black and white image (no need for RGB, sometimes not even shades of gray, 1bit is enough), if it's a diagram, find vector version of it and save that, if it's a meme whose entertaining value will be preserved even at half resolution, don't save it at 1080K, save it at lowest acceptable quality etc. Some types of images, such as big pixel art or bitmap diagrams, are best saved by converting them to indexed mode with let's say 32 colors and then saving then as PNG (it often beats even lossy JPEG). Use simple, common file formats that can be handled by free software or custom written tools, do NOT use proprietary formats or formats that are extremely complicated if you can at all avoid it. Go to great lengths to extract valuable data out of shitty formats: for example if you find a vlog video whose main value is in what's being said and not the video itself, rather find and store the video text transcript ([youtube](youtube.md) has automatic or even manual transcripts for almost all videos, they can be downloaded) than the video itself (it takes much less space, can be searched, indexed, printed and backed up on paper, ...), or, as the next best thing, extract only audio and compress that so that it's just barely understandable (convert to mono, 8bit 8 KHz, store as OGG with very low bitrate).
 - **Careful with [compression](compression.md)**: compression can be good but again, only use it when appropriate, in most cases compression will be achieved just by saving the data in good format (and such compression will generally be even better than general purpose compression). General purpose compression (zip etc.) brings in trouble, for example it makes the data more prone to corruption (removes redundancy, increases entropy), it adds a dependency on the decompression program, it makes the files harder to inspect etc. Use it only on very large files that will get reduced a lot, for example some extremely huge dump of text data will likely benefit from being zipped.
 - **See how to do [backups](backup.md) well** and stick to that.
 - **Use and make tools, automatize**. For example if you're downloading a lot of Wikipedia articles, make a simple script that will extract just the article text, throwing away the unnecessary sidebar, script and styles. Minify all websites you download, remove image tags if you're not saving images etc. Make converting images quicker and simpler e.g. with some ImageMagick scripts. Similarly use ffmpeg to tame your videos. There already exist many web scrapers and format converters and a lot can be achieved with the basic Unix tools, just look stuff up.
-- **Organization may be good**: primarily try to name the files well, only use alphanumeric characters and underscore, limit the filename length and adopt some general naming rules. This will help preserve correct names when copying between different systems, and it will make searching more comfortable too. Some general directory structure may be cool, for example separating free and proprietary data will allow you to easily upload the free part anywhere on the Internet and so partially back it up, whereas with proprietary data you might get in trouble. Do not overdo organization though, that may lead to obsessions and wasting time, even complicating the search for something -- [keep it simple](kiss.md). Put some thought into WHY you're organizing the files certain way, don't just do it because it "looks nice", just use your fucking brain.
+- **Organization may be good**: primarily try to name the files well, only use alphanumeric characters and underscore, limit the filename length and adopt some general naming rules (it may be cool if the filename contains some simple [hash](hash.md) of the file itself so that adding a file with an already existing name won't overwrite the previous file). This will help preserve correct names when copying between different systems, and it will make searching more comfortable too. Some general directory structure may be cool, for example separating free and proprietary data will allow you to easily upload the free part anywhere on the Internet and so partially back it up, whereas with proprietary data you might get in trouble. Do not overdo organization though, that may lead to huge mess (see Wikimedia Commons category hell), obsessions and wasting time, even complicating the search for something -- [keep it simple](kiss.md). Put some thought into WHY you're organizing the files that way, don't just do it because it "looks nice", just use your fucking brain.
 - **NEVER [ENCRYPT](encryption.md)** for fucks sake, encryption is [shit](shit.md).
 - ...
 
+{ As I'm writing this I've been hoarding files for a few months for my "offline Internet" which I want to keep in my Raspberry Pi doomsday computer in a forest where I have no Internet access. I have only about 16 GB of space available for it but I won't be getting anywhere near the limit anytime soon, I follow what I wrote above. I only pick very high quality files of all kinds (memes, diagrams, cheatsheets, maps, screenshots, papers, personal photos, books, websites, programs, porn, ...) and process them well. I keep downloading more and more good files as I encounter them (on 4chan, WM commons, wiby, textfiles.com, gutenberg, gopher, reddit, various wikis, Internet Archive, ...) and transfer them on a USB stick (and I back everything up elsewhere too of course). Currently I have thousands of images, offline webpages, books and a few other things such as program source codes, chess PGNs, video games for emulators, audio files to listen to, even a few movies -- I managed to ffmpeg each movie to around just 20 MB of size (!!!), or should I rather say a low resolution slide show (the resolution is like 120x96 or something), but it's absolutely sufficient, plus playing such a file should in theory drain less battery also. Similarly I compress an hour long audio file to something like 1 or 2 MB. Images I try to keep around 200 kB each. I found downloading YouTube video transcripts is very cool as they take very little space and some are quite good content (the best videos even have high quality manual transcripts), I can even easily cut out the sponsorship crap from the text, and later on I can either read the files or use espeak to read them which is almost like literally having YouTube but BETTER (no ads and shit, espeak's voice is even more pleasant than average YouTuber's voice). Another life hack: download SRT subtitles for documentaries -- same thing, it's small and almost as good as the gigantic video. I also have a lot of MIDI music: again, it sounds good and takes very little space. Grep is my search engine. Of course I also download proprietary files because when the lights go out, there will no longer be any copyright. Some of the texts and images I have also printed out (currently several hundred A4 sheets with tiny font) to have accessible even without the computer. ~drummyfish }
+
 ## How To Do It Wrong
 
 Do the opposite of what's described above, download everything just in case, in the highest resolution you can find, develop an adrenaline kick just from the feeling of right clicking a file, buy as many hard drives as you can afford and then fill them up with everything you find, then cry at least whole day if one of them gets corrupted. Then set up an expensive system that will be keeping it all backed up, that will eat up electricity and space and require you to run around it and replace broken disks constantly, clean the dust and keep updating the software that powers it. Encrypt it all with a STRONG password that consists of 1000 absolutely random characters, dedicate 12 hours a day to memorizing this password (you mustn't write it down anywhere) and keep changing the password every month. If you forget the password get depressed and dope yourself with antidepressants so you can keep repeating this. Get attached to your collection like it's your waifu.

encyclopedia.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ Since an encyclopedia will typically focus on encompassing wide knowledge, as th
 
 Great nerds read encyclopedias linearly from start to finish just like a normal book, which may help expand one's knowledge as well as ignite curiosity in new things and spot some cool interesting facts. { And yet bigger nerds write their own encyclopedias. ~drummyfish }
 
-**Similar terms:** encyclopedias, which also used to be called **cyclopedias** in the past, are similar to **dictionaries** and these types of books often overlap (many encyclopedias call themselves dictionaries); the main difference is that a dictionary focuses on providing linguistic information and generally has shorter term definitions, while encyclopedias have longer articles (which however limits their total number, i.e. encyclopedias will usually prefer quality over quantity). Encyclopedias are also a subset of so called **reference works**, i.e. works that serve to provide [information](information.md) and reference to it (other kinds of reference works being e.g. world maps, tabulated values or [API](api.md) references). A **universal/general** encyclopedia is one that focuses on human knowledge at wide, as opposed to an encyclopedia that focuses on one specific field of knowledge. **Compendium** can be seen almost as a synonym to encyclopedia, with encyclopedias perhaps usually being more general and extensive. **Almanac** is also similar to encyclopedia, more focusing on tabular data. **Micropedia** is another term, sometimes used to denote a smaller encyclopedia (one edition of Britannica came with a micropedia as well as a larger macropedia). There are also **catalogs** which often serve commercial purposes but in practice can be useful as well.
+**Similar terms:** encyclopedias, which also used to be called **cyclopedias** in the past, are similar to **dictionaries** and these types of books often overlap (many encyclopedias call themselves dictionaries); the main difference is that a dictionary focuses on providing linguistic information and generally has shorter term definitions, while encyclopedias have longer articles (which however limits their total number, i.e. encyclopedias will usually prefer quality over quantity). Encyclopedias are also a subset of so called **reference works**, i.e. works that serve to provide [information](information.md) and reference to it (other kinds of reference works being e.g. world maps, tabulated values or [API](api.md) references). A **universal/general** encyclopedia is one that focuses on human knowledge at wide, as opposed to an encyclopedia that focuses on one specific field of knowledge. **Compendium** can be seen almost as a synonym to encyclopedia, with encyclopedias perhaps usually being more general and extensive. **Almanac** is also similar to encyclopedia, more focusing on tabular data. **Micropedia** is another term, sometimes used to denote a smaller encyclopedia (one edition of Britannica came with a micropedia as well as a larger macropedia). There are also **catalogs** which often serve commercial purposes but in practice can be useful as well. [World wide web](www.md) recently invented a new form of encyclopedia: a so called **[wiki](wiki.md)** that's essentially a purely electronic, constantly changing and [updating](update_culture.md) encyclopedia (i.e. changes aren't published periodically but instantly) with hyperlinked (containing clickable links in the text) articles, typically edited by many different people, very often unpaid volunteers.
 
 These are some **nice/interesting/benchmark articles** to look up in encyclopedias: [algorithm](algorithm.md),  [anarchism](anarchism.md), Andromeda (galaxy), Antarctica, Atlantis, atom, [axiom of choice](axiom_of_choice.md), [Bible](bible.md), [big bang](big_bang.md), [black hole](black_hole.md), [brain](brain.md), [Buddhism](buddhism.md), [C](c.md) (programming language), [cannibalism](cannibalism.md), [capitalism](capitalism.md), castle, [cat](cat.md), [censorship](censorship.md), [central processing unit](cpu.md), [chess](chess.md), Chicxulub, China, [color](color.md), comet, [communism](communism.md), [computer](computer.md), [Creative Commons](creative_commons.md), [Deep Blue](deep_blue.md), [democracy](democracy.md), Democratic People's Republic of Korea, [depression](depression.md), [determinism](determinism.md), [dinosaur](dinosaur.md), dodo, [dog](dog.md), [Doom](doom.md) (game), [Earth](earth.md), [Einstein](einstein.md), [Elo](elo.md), [Encyclopedia](encyclopedia.md), [entropy](entropy.md), [ethics](ethics.md), [Euler's Number](e.md), [evolution](evolution.md), [font](font.md), [football](football.md), [fractal](fractal.md), [free software](free_software.md), [game](game.md), gigantopythecus, [go](go.md) (game), [god](god.md), [GNU](gnu.md) project, [hacker](hacking.md), Hanging Gardens of Babylon, [hardware](hardware.md), [Hitler](hitler.md), [Holocaust](holocaust.md), [homosexual](gay.md), [human](human.md), [infinity](infinity.md), [information](information.md), intelligence, [Internet](internet.md), [IQ](iq.md), Japan, [Jesus](jesus.md), [Jew](jew.md), [language](language.md), [Latin](latin.md), [life](life.md), [light](light.md), lightning, [Linux](linux.md), [logarithm](log.md), [logic](logic.md), [love](love.md), Mammoth, [mathematics](math.md), Mariana Trench, Mars, Milky Way, Moon, [morality](morality.md), Mount Everest, [music](music.md), [necrophilia](necropiilia.md), [number](number.md), [Open Source](open_source.md), negro, [nigger](nigger.md), pacifism, [pedophilia](pedophilia.md), [penis](penis.md), [pi](pi.md), Pluto, [prime number](prime.md), [quaternion](quaternion.md), Pompei, [Quran](quran.md), [race](race.md), Roman Empire, [sex](sex.md), [sine](sin.md), [schizophrenia](schizo.md), [software](sw.md), [Stallman](rms.md) (Richard), [star](star.md), Stonehenge, [suicide](suicide.md), Sun, Tibet, [technology](technology.md), Tetris, [time](time.md), Titanic, [transistor](transistor.md), Troy, Tyrannousaurus Rex, [UFO](ufo.md), [universe](universe.md), [Unix](unix.md), Uruk, [Usenet](usenet.md), Valonia Ventricosa (bubble algae), Vatican, Venus, video game, [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md), [woman](woman.md), [World War II](wwii.md), [World Wide Web](www.md), ...
 

exercises.md

@@ -226,7 +226,8 @@ Bear in mind this is not a school test that's supposed to decide if you get to a
 119. Use only the logical function [NAND](nand.md) (which gives a negated result of [AND](and.md)) to implement the [XOR](xor.md) logical function.
 120. We have a rubber rope 1 meter long. On one side there is an ant. He starts moving over the rubber towards its other end by the speed of 1 cm/s, however as he starts to move we start stretching the rubber also by the speed of 1 cm/s, so that after 1 second it's 101 cm long, after 2 seconds it's 102 cm long etc. The ant keeps the same speed. Will he ever reach the end? How long would it take him?
 121. Today in [slavery](work.md) I tried to fix 6 computers: I ended up destroying twice as many of them than I fixed. Every time I destroyed a computer my boss told me I'm a retard. How many times did my boss repeat I'm a retard?
-122. Did you enjoy this quiz?
+122. Write the hexadecimal values of a pure green color in 24 bit RGB, [RGB565](rgb565.md) and [RGB332](rgb332.md) formats.
+123. Did you enjoy this quiz?
 
 ### Answers
 
@@ -352,7 +353,8 @@ sin(x) / cos(x) - log2(2) = tg(x) - 1*, so we get *tg(x) >= 1*. So that will hol
 119. a XOR b  = (a OR b) AND NOT(a AND b) = ((a NAND a) NAND (b NAND b)) AND (a NAND b) = (((a NAND a) NAND (b NAND b)) NAND (a NAND b)) NAND (((a NAND a) NAND (b NAND b)) NAND (a NAND b)).
 120. Let *p* be the ant's relative position on the rubber, i.e. the fraction of the rubber he has already traveled; when *p = 1* he'll be in the finish. At the beginning his speed in fractions of the rubber per second is *v = 1/100*. As the rubber expands, the fractional speed decreases (he keeps moving at 1 cm/s but the total number of cm to be traveled increases): we can write the speed as a function of time: *v = 1/(100 + t)*. Now the fractional position *p* over time is an [integral](integral.md) of speed, i.e. *p = integrate 1/(100 + t) dt = log(100 + t) + C* and the initial position is *p = 0*, i.e. *C = -log(100)*, so *p = log(100 + t) - log(100)*. Now we just have to compute when *p* reaches 1, i.e. *log(100 + t) - log(100) = 1*, which gives us *t = 100 * (e - 1) ~= 171.83*. So the ant will reach the end in nearly 3 minutes.
 121. 3: I destroyed 4 computers, so he told me 4 times I'm a retard, i.e. he first told me I'm a retard (this was not a repetition) and then repeated it three times.
-122. yes
+122. 24 bit RGB is easy: 00ff00. For 565 we want a 16 bit value whose upper and lower 5 bits are zero, with the middle bits being ones, i.e. 0000011111100000 in binary, which is 07e0 in hexadecimal. Similarly for 332 we get 1c.
+123. yes
 
 ## Other
 

faq.md

@@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ One way to see LRS is as a philosophy that takes only the [good](good.md) out of
 
 ### Why this obsession with extreme [simplicity](minimalism.md)? Is it because you're too stupid to understand complex stuff?
 
+(May be best to just read articles on [minimalism](minimalism.md), [KISS](kiss.md), [freedom](freedom.md) etc.)
+
 On the contrary, LRS is not stupid enough to embrace complexity. I used to be the [mainstream](mainstream.md), complexity embracing programmer. I am in no way saying I'm a genius but I've put a lot of energy into studying computer science full time for many years so I believe I can say I have some understanding of the "complex" stuff. I speak from own experience and also on behalf of others who shared their experience with me that the appreciation of simplicity and realization of its necessity comes after many years of dealing with the complex and deep insight into the field and into the complex connections of that field to society.
 
 You may ask: well then but why it's just you and a few weirdos who see this, why don't most good programmers share your opinions? Because they need to make living or because they simply WANT to make a lot of money and so they do what the system wants them to do. Education in technology (and generally just being exposed to corporate propaganda since birth) is kind of a trap: it teaches you to embrace complexity and when you realize it's not a good thing, it is too late, you already need to pay your student loan, your rent, your mortgage, and the only thing they want you to do is to keep this complexity cult rolling. So people just do what they need to do and many of them just psychologically make themselves believe something they subconsciously know isn't right because that makes their everyday life easier to live. "Everyone does it so it can't be bad, better not even bother thinking about it too much". It's difficult doing something every day that you think is wrong, so you make yourself believe it's right.
@@ -58,7 +60,6 @@ A forum, mailing list or something would possibly be nice, so far I've only expe
 
 Do I look like a fucking degenerated [zoomer](zoomer.md)?
 
-
 ### I am a furry transsexual gay zoomer and/or capitalist etc., do you hate me?
 
 NO, I do not hate you at all! In fact most of my best online friends normally fall into some of the listed categories, don't let the propaganda convince you we can't be friends. We can be good friends despite liking or being something the other one dislikes, it only means that we are different, but why should we be enemies? Even if we don't end up being besties I will never hate you personally, my life philosophy is based on loving everyone unconditionally, I will possibly only hate and criticize things you do or want to do or trends you follow, but I will never want to have anyone executed or put in prison or punished in any way, it's literally us having different opinions on something and that's that.
@@ -83,11 +84,26 @@ At the moment it's just me, [drummyfish](drummyfish.md). This started as a colla
 
 If you want to contribute to the cause, just create your own website, spread the ideas you liked here -- you may or may not refer to LRS, everything's up to you. Start creating software with LRS philosophy if you can -- together we can help evolve and spread our ideas in a decentralized way, without me or anyone else being an authority, a potential censor. That's the best way forward I think.
 
+### Are you making any money off of this websites and/or your projects? How are you financing this? Are you collecting and selling my precious cookies? Is it from donations? How much do you make on them? Why are you doing this if not for money?
+
+This is NOT and NEVER WILL be even partially a commercial project, there will NEVER be a single ad or sponsor or even anything inserted as a favor to someone, that would go completely against my fundamental beliefs and the message carried by this work, all my projects are [selfless](selflessness.md) and they are NOT aimed at making money at all OR extracting any other kind of capital or benefit purely for myself (such as self promotion etc.): things I make are the purpose of my life, not fastfood hamburgers, they must remain absolutely pure and must not in a slightest become affected by any financial interests, plus I also hate money, business, trade and capitalism in general. I make all of this in my spare time and apart from some tiny fees (for a domain etc.), which I minimize and can absolutely manage on my own, I have no other expenses than keeping myself alive, cost of which I also try to minimize.
+
+Of course I'm NOT collecting your data lol.
+
+Now yes, I have to say that as I am writing this I currently DO have the donation option available on my personal website, but I really try my best to not let this affect what I do in any way, it's just me accepting money from people who want to give them to me. Let me add this:
+
+- Donations are not a way to finance my projects or reward me for what I do (and so direct me in what I am doing), my projects or my life are not directed by donations or dependent on donations, they are a way to share money (i.e. food and other resources) with me for the people who can afford it and want to do it.
+- I AM actually sometimes unsure about if it's a good thing for me to do, maybe I'll stop accepting donations in the future. In the past I experimented with taking donations just out of curiosity, I wanted to see if/how much I could make that way, and now (when I have a more refined life philosophy) I decided to just keep the option up for now, it IS useful to me as my income is quite low and I am trying to save up something and buy things that will make me as independent as possible, BUT I am always keeping in mind that I must NEVER aim to become dependent on donations or aim to increase them, I'd rather quit than continue in a commercial way (though I can't see how I could even ever become unable to continue my projects due to financial trouble). I also hate that there only exist unethical ways of taking donations such as paypal or [cryptocurrencies](crypto.md), it's another reason why I'm thinking of canceling the donations.
+- For the above reasons I don't encourage donations too much, I don't go around asking for them, I just left a small info on the bottom of my website, I really don't want to get big sponsors and become a slave to money, it is actually something I rather fear. Whenever I got a bigger donation I've always had a bit of mixed feelings: I felt very grateful but also a kind of burden of responsibility to keep delivering to the people. I do want to be delivering but the pressure I feel (even if the donor says there is no pressure) is something I find hard to deal with (part of my personality is a very elevated sensitivity to the stress of responsibility).
+- I don't make any significant money this way, it's more like an occasional tip from good people who want to share with me. Some people have been very generous and have sent me very significant amounts of money, and I want to leave my most sincere gratitude to them -- the money allowed me for example to occasionally buy a new [cool device](open_console.md) to which I port my games, and I am extremely glad for it, but it's not a stable income, it's nowhere near a fraction of a livable minimum, and I like it that way because of the above reasons.
+- I make it clear that donations don't buy anything from me, money will not affect what I do at all, it's purely for people who want to make me happier. I also clearly state that people should only donate if they can really afford it, I never want to take anything that someone would miss.
+- My justification for accepting donations is this: I think those who have more should share with those who have less (and I try to practice this as well, I give money to the homeless for example), and so I will not refuse to take something I will find useful if someone gives it to me because he won't be missing it too much, it's the same as if someone leaves something by the trash because he doesn't need it and I take it because to me it's useful. This is what I sincerely believe as part of my [life philosophy](less_retarded_society.md) and I try to make extra sure it's not just an excuse I came up with to grab some money, I really do think about this a lot and should it threaten the quality of what I create, I will stop immediately. I do hate money but it's sadly how sharing works under our dystopia: if someone wants to share food with me, he does it by sending money over the Internet. So the conflict I feel about donations is actually more in using the harmful monetary and technological system (and so possibly supporting it) rather than taking something that someone is giving to me. I honestly don't know if I should continue accepting donations or not, it is possible I am doing something that's slightly wrong out of my weakness, please don't assume everything I do is correct, but I can promise I will try to do as little harm I can practically manage.
+
 ### Why is it called a wiki when it's written just by one guy? Is it to deceive people into thinking there's a whole movement rather than just one weirdo?
 
 Yes.
 
-No, of course not you dumbo. There is no intention of deception, this project started as a collaborative wiki with multiple contributors, named *Based Wiki*, however I (drummyfish) forked my contributions (most of the original Wiki) into my own Wiki and renamed it to *Less Retarded Wiki* because I didn't like the direction of the original wiki. At that point I was still allowing and looking for more contributors, but somehow none of the original people came to contribute and meanwhile I've expanded my LRS Wiki to the point at which I decided it's simply a snapshot of my own views and so I decided to keep it my own project and kept the name that I established, the *LRS Wiki*. Even though at the moment it's missing the main feature of a wiki, i.e. collaboration of multiple people, it is still a project that most people would likely call a "wiki" naturally (even if only a personal one, also called a *monoproject*) due to having all the other features of wikis (separate, constantly changing articles linked via hypertext, non-linear structure etc.) and simply looking like a wiki -- nowadays there are many wikis that are mostly written by a single man (see e.g. small fandom wikis) and people still call them wikis because culturally the term has simply taken a wider meaning, people don't expect a wiki to absolutely necessarily be collaborative and so there is no deception. If you're still like "NONONONO I REFUSE TO ACCEPT THIS" then see this as a wiki that's collaboratively edited by many of my alternative personalities. Additionally I am still open to the idea to possibly allowing contributions, so I'm simply keeping this a wiki, the wiki is in a sense waiting for a larger community to come -- anyone may fork it at any time BTW. Finally the ideas I present here are not just mine but really do reflect existing movements/philosophies with significant numbers of supporters (suckless, free software, ...).
+No, of course not you dumbo. There is no intent of deception, this project started as a collaborative wiki with multiple contributors, named *Based Wiki*, however I (drummyfish) forked my contributions (most of the original Wiki) into my own Wiki and renamed it to *Less Retarded Wiki* because I didn't like the direction of the original wiki. At that point I was still allowing and looking for more contributors, but somehow none of the original people came to contribute and meanwhile I've expanded my LRS Wiki to the point at which I decided it's simply a snapshot of my own views and so I decided to keep it my own project and kept the name that I established, the *LRS Wiki*. Even though at the moment it's missing the main feature of a wiki, i.e. collaboration of multiple people, it is still a project that most people would likely call a "wiki" naturally (even if only a personal one, also called a *monoproject*) due to having all the other features of wikis (separate, constantly changing articles linked via hypertext, non-linear structure etc.) and simply looking like a wiki -- nowadays there are many wikis that are mostly written by a single man (see e.g. small fandom wikis) and people still call them wikis because culturally the term has simply taken a wider meaning, people don't expect a wiki to absolutely necessarily be collaborative and so there is no deception. If you're still like "NONONONO I REFUSE TO ACCEPT THIS" then see this as a wiki that's collaboratively edited by many of my alternative personalities. Additionally I am still open to the idea to possibly allowing contributions one day (or maybe when I die people will simply take this and make it to a collaborative wiki or something), so I'm simply keeping this a wiki, the wiki is in a sense waiting for a larger community to come -- anyone may fork it at any time BTW. Finally the ideas I present here are not just mine but really do reflect existing movements/philosophies with significant numbers of supporters (suckless, free software, ...).
 
 ### Why did you make this wiki? What is its purpose?
 
@@ -143,6 +159,14 @@ This is a good point, we talk about [capitalism](capitalism.md) simply because i
 
 Nah, it's all essentially the same, as long as it's based on [competition](competition.md) it's just a different stage of capitalism at best, all these things are based on the fundamentally flawed idea of letting humans compete -- this will always lead to things like trade, money, people forming bigger groups, companies, cartels and eventually corporations etcetc. Only those who believe capitalism can somehow be fixed or made manageable find it important to distinguish different types of it, we just oppose it all, so we don't bother to distinguish between different flavors of shit too much, that would be just unnecessary and distracting.
 
+### Since you are against competition, are you also against games? Humans can't live without competition!
+
+LRS only opposes SOCIAL [competition](competition.md): we say competition as a mechanism by which society functions is bad, and that's what we want to remove. Competition as a part of voluntary games is fine and welcome, it is true that humans have the need for competition which games harmlessly satisfy. If you lose in a game, not much happens, but if you lose in competition for food, you die. It's the same as with violence: probably most people accept that violence is bad in real life and we'd like to have a society free of any violence, but we are fine with violence in video games, and in fact these games may help us satisfy our violent instincts and then be less violent in real life. So no need to worry about games, we love them too.
+
+### Since you are against anonymity/censorship/privacy/secrecy, are you for example against anonymous imagine boards? Why are you using them if you hate anonymity?
+
+Same answer as in previous question: anonymity (i.e. secrecy, censorship etc.) must not be a mechanism on which our society relies, it's a harmful mechanism in this context, good society must be open, uncensored, compatible with truth, with free speech, without fear of talking, without the need for censorship etc., BUT the concept of anonymity is not bad in itself -- once again, it may be fine as a part of a voluntary social game, which image boards are. Many card games are based on hiding one's cards from other players, we do NOT want to reject these games simply because they are based on the mechanism of secrecy, we merely argue that secrecy is a bad pillar of society.
+
 ### How is this different from [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md)?
 
 In many ways. Our wiki is better e.g. by being more [free](free_culture.md) (completely [public domain](public_domain.md), no [fair use](fair_use.md) [proprietary](proprietary.md) images etc.), less [bloated](bloat.md), better accessible, not infected by [pseudoleftist](psedoleft.md) [fascism](fascism.md) and censorship (we only censor absolutely necessary things, e.g. copyrighted things or things that would immediately put us in jail, though we still say many things that may get us in jail), we have articles that are better readable etc.
@@ -259,7 +283,7 @@ A simple analogy is this: a law is so fucked up nowadays that it forces us to po
 
 However using legal tools will always be a question of considering the pros and cons -- at the time of writing this using CC0 is very easy and achieves great freedom with almost no negative effects, so we choose to do it. But if in the future situation changes so that achieving legal public domain would have more negative effects, then we might choose to ignore the law -- if for example in the future it is ruled that to release something into legal public domain one has to fill out many sheets of paper and pay some fees, we would probably reconsider accepting this as that burdens creators, discriminates against the poor, supports financial bullying and gives money to the overlords, so in such case we'd probably choose to rather ignore law and just use informal waivers. In the dystopia we are simply always looking for the least bad solution.
 
-### What software is this wiki POWERED BY? Maybe some kind of NPM heroku static generator responsive solution on rails running inside a banana orange virtual machine that I can conjure up by praying to the gods through ten layers of virtualized docker solutions?
+### What software is this wiki POWERED BY? Maybe some kind of orchestrated NPM heroku static generator responsive solution on rails running inside a banana orange virtual machine that I can conjure up by praying to the gods through ten layers of virtualized docker solutions?
 
 None of that bullshit, I use [git](git.md), the articles are written in [markdown](md.md) and converted to [HTML](html.md) with a simple script.
 

less_retarded_society.md

@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@ Note that less retarded society is an ideal [model](model.md), i.e. it can proba
 
 In current society people wake up in the morning and go banging a head against a wall for the whole day, then they suffer from major headaches, sometimes acquire brain damage and their walls are red from all the blood. They try to solve this by investing into development of anti-headache medicine and researching paints that are cheap while covering the blood on the wall, some people spend centuries developing a wall material that's strong enough to hold the house but also locally soft so that it doesn't hurt that much to hit it with a head, but they created a system in which the material can only be used if some people throw enough pieces of paper that says "yes" into some kind of box and then some guy has to also draw a certain shape on a piece of paper, because otherwise it would be too easy. There are two major parties, one says you should hit the wall with your head as quickly as you can, the other one says you should hit it slowly but much stronger, then some smaller parties are something in between. Some very underground parties promote extremely progressive ideas such as leaving out the wall altogether and rather hitting yourself with a hammer because that's more efficient and the word *efficiency* [sounds good](shortcut_thinking.md). There are also organizations that overlook the discussion between these parties but they are corrupt so there is another organization that overlooks the previous organization. If you think it's all idiotic you're right -- the only sane group in the world is LRS that simply says: stop hitting walls with your heads you retards, it will solve everything and you'll get rid of all the [bullshit](bullshit.md) around as a bonus.
 
+After all less retarded society can be described very simply. We now have the technology and other means to make Earth a good place to live. LRS only says: let's make Earth a good place to live. For some reason all people nowadays want to do the exact opposite. This is what LRS wants to change.
+
 ## Basis: Love Of All Life
 
 When thinking about how to change society for the better, the first thing that needs to be done is defining a goal which the society should aim for -- an [axiom](axiom.md) which serves as a measure of what's objectively [good](good.md) and [bad](bad.md), which in turn helps us take the right steps towards the good. This is only logical, without a goal we aren't really trying to achieve anything and "good" and "evil" are just words without any objective meaning.

lrs_dictionary.md

@@ -30,9 +30,10 @@ WORK IN PROGRESS
 | [copyright](copyright.md)                  | copywrong, copyrestriction, copyrape                        |
 | [CSS](css.md)                              | cascading stylish [shit](shit.md)                           |
 | [C++](cpp.md)                              | crippled C                                                  |
+| [DIY](diy.md)                              | don't injure yourself                                       |
 | [Debian](debian.md)                        | Lesbian                                                     |
 | [democracy](democracy.md)                  | democrazy                                                   |
-| demonetization                             | demonization                                                |
+| demonetization                             | demonization, demonification                                |
 | digital garden                             | digital swamp                                               |
 | digital rights management ([DRM](drm.md))  | digital restrictions management                             |
 | Discord                                    | Discunt                                                     |

main.md

@@ -132,11 +132,12 @@ Are you a [noob](noob.md) but see our ideas as appealing and would like to join
 - That the [dickheads](faggot.md) maintaining the debian `fortune` utility package started to [censor](censorship.md) "offensive" fortunes, moving them to a separate `fortunes-off` package that won't by default be installed, and which in the [future](future.md) will be removed completely? They also put some cringe disclaimers and apologies to man pages and so on.
 - That [Kinora](kinora.md), invented around 1895, allowed people to view short videos with a simple, small, purely mechanical device? It used the flip-book principle.
 - That [Christopher Knight](christopher_knight.md) (AKA The Maine Hermit) one day just spontaneously left society and lived 27 years in a forest without any human contact. He lived by stealing items he needed -- he performed around 1000 robberies. Very based.
-- That you fart more on a plane due to lower pressure.
+- That you fart more on a plane due to lowered pressure?
 - That before refrigerators were invented people used so called ice houses to store food in cold temperatures? Ice house was kind of a cellar into which ice was put during winter and where it would last throughout whole summer until the next winter.
 - That [wifi](wifi.md) radiation causes [cancer](cancer.md)?
 - That David Hampson is a man who repeatedly commits the crime of standing in the middle of the road, lets himself be arrested and then refuses to speak a single word, then goes to jail and once released repeats this whole again? He is capable of talking, he just likes doing this. This is one of the most [based](based.md) things anyone has ever done.
 - That as early as 1907 it was possible to send photographs over long distances via telephone lines (basically [fax](fax.md) them) thanks to Belinographe? The photo was rotating on a cylinder where a beam of light was scanning it by lines and transmitting the reflected light intensity as electric current to the receiver who reversed the process to recreate the image.
+- That hygrometers (devices that measure air humidity) typically work by having a stretched human hair inside which changes its tension based on air humidity?
 
 ## Topics
 

often_confused.md

@@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ There exist many terms that are highly similar and can legitimately be used inte
 - **[strategy](strategy.md)** vs **[tactics](tactics.md)**
 - **[Unicode](unicode.md)** vs **[UTF](utf.md)**
 - **[webpage](webpage.md)** vs **[website](website.md)**
+- **[wiki](wiki.md)** vs **[Wikipedia](wikipedia.md)**
 - ...
 
 ## See Also

rms.md

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Regarding [software](software.md) Stallman has for his whole life strongly and t
 
 This said, we naturally also have to state we don't nearly agree with all he says. For example he isn't too concerned about [bloat](bloat.md) (judging by the GNU software and his own creation, [Emacs](emacs.md)) and he also doesn't care that much about [free culture](free_culture.md) (some of his written works prohibit modification, see [GFDL](gfdl.md)'s "invariant seciotns", and his GNU project allows proprietary non-functional data as long as they are not "software"). Sadly he has also shown signs of being a [type A fail](fail_ab.md) personality by writing about some kind of [newspeak](newspeak.md) "*gender neutral language*" and by seeming to be caught in a [fight culture](fight_culture.md). On his website he also has an [American](usa.md) flag and claims to be a patriot, i.e. leaning to nationalism and therefore [fascism](fascism.md). Nevertheless he definitely can't be accused of populism or hypocrisy as he basically tells what he considers to be the truth no matter what, and he is very consistent in this. Some of his unpopular opinions (mostly those opposing [pedophile](pedophilia.md) witch hunt, with which we DO agree) brought him a lot of trouble and an endless wrath of [SJW](sjw.md)s. For this **he was [cancelled](cancel_culture.md)** and in 2019 was forced to resigned from the position of president of the FSF but continues to support it.
 
-He is a weird guy, having been recorded on video eating dirt from his feet before giving a lecture besides others -- another time he was even recorded raging on stage after being stressed out but that's actually odd -- he practically always keeps a calm, monotone, very rational speech (much different from any politician or revolutionary). In the book *Free as in Freedom* he admits he might be slightly [autistic](autism.md). Nevertheless he's extremely smart, has magna [cum](cum.md) laude degree in [physics](physics.md) from Harvard, 10+ honorary doctorates, fluently speaks English, Spanish, French and a little bit of Indonesian and has many times proven his superior programming skills (even though he later stopped programming to fully work on promoting the FSF). He is really good at public speaking, and that despite the mentioned calmness of his speech -- here possibly his inner autism shines because he just speaks in very simple but cold rational and logical ways that everyone from an expert to a complete layman understands, he rarely stops to say something like "ummm... wait", he's just letting out carefully crafted sentences as if you were reading them from a book, showing ways from facts to logical conclusions without cheap rhetoric tricks like wild gesticulation, rising voice or using buzzwords and strong terms. His interviews are however often awkward for the same reasons: it's usually the interviewer asking a question and then waiting 15 minutes for Stallman to print out the whole answer without giving a chance to be interrupted.
+He is a weird guy, looks a bit like PS1 Hagrid, and has been recorded on video eating dirt from his feet before giving a lecture besides others -- another time he was even recorded raging on stage after being stressed out but that's actually odd -- he practically always keeps a calm, monotone, very rational speech (much different from any politician or revolutionary). In the book *Free as in Freedom* he admits he might be slightly [autistic](autism.md). Nevertheless he's extremely smart, has magna [cum](cum.md) laude degree in [physics](physics.md) from Harvard, 10+ honorary doctorates, fluently speaks English, Spanish, French and a little bit of Indonesian and has many times proven his superior programming skills (even though he later stopped programming to fully work on promoting the FSF). He is really good at public speaking, and that despite the mentioned calmness of his speech -- here possibly his inner autism shines because he just speaks in very simple but cold rational and logical ways that everyone from an expert to a complete layman understands, he rarely stops to say something like "ummm... wait", he's just letting out carefully crafted sentences as if you were reading them from a book, showing ways from facts to logical conclusions without cheap rhetoric tricks like wild gesticulation, rising voice or using buzzwords and strong terms. His interviews are however often awkward for the same reasons: it's usually the interviewer asking a question and then waiting 15 minutes for Stallman to print out the whole answer without giving a chance to be interrupted.
 
 Stallman has a [beautifully](beauty.md) [minimalist](minimalism.md) website at http://www.stallman.org where he actively comments on current news and issues. He also made the famous free software song (well, only the lyrics, the melody is taken from a Bulgarian folk song Sadi Moma) -- he often performs it in public himself (he is pretty good at keeping the weird rhythm of the song while at the same time also singing, that's impressive).
 

wiki_stats.md

@@ -2,10 +2,10 @@
 
 This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
 
-- number of articles: 617
+- number of articles: 618
-- number of commits: 956
+- number of commits: 957
-- total size of all texts in bytes: 4939435
+- total size of all texts in bytes: 4945393
-- total number of lines of article texts: 35962
+- total number of lines of article texts: 35985
 - number of script lines: 294
 - occurrences of the word "person": 9
 - occurrences of the word "nigger": 103
@@ -35,53 +35,53 @@ longest articles:
 
 top 50 5+ letter words:
 
-- which (2732)
+- which (2736)
-- there (2153)
+- there (2156)
-- people (2048)
+- people (2052)
-- example (1697)
+- example (1700)
-- other (1550)
+- other (1553)
-- about (1362)
+- about (1366)
 - number (1300)
-- software (1237)
+- software (1239)
-- because (1111)
+- because (1113)
-- their (1052)
+- their (1053)
-- would (1033)
+- would (1036)
 - program (1023)
-- something (1009)
+- something (1010)
 - being (987)
-- things (946)
+- things (947)
-- language (924)
+- language (925)
 - called (903)
 - simple (845)
 - function (839)
-- without (836)
+- without (838)
 - computer (831)
 - numbers (819)
-- different (773)
+- different (774)
-- however (767)
+- however (768)
 - programming (757)
-- these (752)
+- these (753)
-- world (736)
+- world (737)
-- system (715)
+- system (717)
+- should (696)
 - doesn (696)
-- should (692)
+- still (689)
-- still (688)
+- games (666)
-- games (665)
+- while (662)
-- while (661)
+- point (654)
-- point (653)
+- simply (641)
 - society (640)
-- simply (640)
+- drummyfish (640)
-- drummyfish (638)
 - possible (629)
 - using (622)
-- probably (609)
+- probably (611)
-- always (607)
+- always (610)
-- course (587)
+- course (588)
-- similar (583)
+- similar (584)
 - though (572)
 - https (572)
 - basically (566)
-- actually (561)
+- actually (562)
 - someone (560)
 - really (560)
 - technology (539)
@@ -89,6 +89,22 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
 latest changes:
 
 ```
+Date:   Wed Jan 8 16:36:13 2025 +0100
+  chess.md
+  comment.md
+  copyright.md
+  go.md
+  licar.md
+  lrs_dictionary.md
+  name_is_important.md
+  often_confused.md
+  race.md
+  random_page.md
+  stereotype.md
+  technology.md
+  usa.md
+  wiki_pages.md
+  wiki_stats.md
 Date:   Mon Jan 6 23:39:23 2025 +0100
   21st_century.md
   acronym.md
@@ -109,20 +125,6 @@ Date:   Mon Jan 6 23:39:23 2025 +0100
   wiki_stats.md
   work.md
 Date:   Tue Dec 31 16:58:28 2024 +0100
-  abstraction.md
-  calculus.md
-  encyclopedia.md
-  fear_culture.md
-  jesus.md
-  pedophilia.md
-  progress.md
-  random_page.md
-  stereotype.md
-  terry_davis.md
-  wiki_pages.md
-  wiki_stats.md
-  zoomer.md
-Date:   Mon Dec 30 20:45:53 2024 +0100
 ```
 
 most wanted pages:
@@ -154,7 +156,7 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
 - [capitalism](capitalism.md) (289) 
 - [c](c.md) (234) 
 - [bloat](bloat.md) (227) 
-- [free_software](free_software.md) (194) 
+- [free_software](free_software.md) (195) 
 - [game](game.md) (148) 
 - [suckless](suckless.md) (146) 
 - [proprietary](proprietary.md) (132) 
@@ -172,10 +174,10 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
 - [fight_culture](fight_culture.md) (94) 
 - [bullshit](bullshit.md) (94) 
 - [woman](woman.md) (92) 
+- [art](art.md) (91) 
 - [hacking](hacking.md) (90) 
-- [art](art.md) (90) 
+- [free_culture](free_culture.md) (89) 
 - [corporation](corporation.md) (89) 
-- [free_culture](free_culture.md) (88) 
 - [less_retarded_society](less_retarded_society.md) (87) 
 - [public_domain](public_domain.md) (85) 
 - [chess](chess.md) (85) 

windows.md

@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Windows has these disadvantages (this is just a few things, we can't possibly as
 - If you use it your mother will die in her sleep.
 - ...
 
-Some "people" still decide to use it. Why? For a single reason: it comes preinstalled on the computer they buy.
+Some "people" still decide to use it. Why? For a single reason: it comes preinstalled on the computer they buy. If it didn't come preinstalled on every single computers, exactly 0.00000000000% people would be using it.
 
 Not that you should never use Windows programs but even if you WANT that you can do it with [Wine](wine.md) under GNU/Linux, sometimes the programs even run better under Wine than on winshit itself lol. By this there is [zero](zero.md) (or maybe even fewer) reasons to ever use windows, it's literally just for [faggots](faggot.md).
 

woman.md

@@ -143,6 +143,10 @@ Here is a list of almost all historically notable women (this is NOT cherrypicke
 
 { People ask me why I'm bashing women so much here :D Basically for [fun](fun.md), but the main reason is probably [feminism](feminism.md) -- the more they try to make women godlike, the more fun I make of them. So blame feminists basically. But it is definitely true women are dumb and less skilled at everything, propaganda just tries to cover the truth so I uncover it here again. ~drummyfish }
 
+## Were There Actually Some Significant Women In History?
+
+No.
+
 ## Drummyfish's Official Apologies To Based Women
 
 *The following is written by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md), the author of this article.*