Update

soyence.md

@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ For the ones who possibly still don't get it, here is a little comparison. It is
 
 Of course, once science advances, it may stop being so simple as for everyone to be able to for example check the results that scientists found, that's without doubt, the point is simply that at the stage when the field starts being a religion, for whatever reason at all, we can no longer call it science, it is simply religion that evolved from science. That is all.
 
+Soyence popularizators also like to contaminate science with emotion, with "stories" and [heroes](hero_culture.md) and other kind of bullshit that has no place in true science: true science is pure rationality and to that emotion is an obstacle. Science is a cold, emotionless tool -- if you don't see [beauty](beauty.md) in this fact alone, science is not for you.
+
 Some further examples of soyence:
 
 - [gender studies](gender_studies.md) [LMAO](lmao.md)
@@ -40,6 +42,7 @@ Some further examples of soyence:
 - "We should burn these old books that say things we don't like, just in case. When Nazis did it it was different."
 - "This research was made by a [racist](racism.md) so it is invalid, also we should [lynch](cancel_culture.md) the guy just in case."
 - Neil de grass/Morgan Freeman "documentaries"
+- Deducing cool facts on TV about extinct animals from their skull shapes is Neil De grass stamp of approval legit thumbs up paleonthology science yay! :)))) But trying in on humans ([phrenology](phrenology.md)) is a bad bad NONO PSEUDOSCIENCE, neil de grass frown :(((
 - "We can totally trust the results of commercial research."
 - "These negative results are useful but unexciting so let's not publish them, we gotta entertain our readers to stay on the market. We GOTTA TELL INSPIRATIONAL STORIES with our papers." --soyence journals
 - "No, you can't research the details of historic events such as Holocaust." (see anti [Holocaust](holocaust.md) denial laws)