Update
This commit is contained in:
parent
50af01815e
commit
8b1d7a4381
30 changed files with 1893 additions and 1799 deletions
6
4chan.md
6
4chan.md
|
|
@ -2,15 +2,15 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{ haha https://lolwut.info/comp/4chan/4chan-g.html ~drummyfish }
|
{ haha https://lolwut.info/comp/4chan/4chan-g.html ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
4chan (https://4chan.org/, also 4cuck) is the most famous [image board](image_board.md), a website causing controversies by its low [censorship](censorship.md) and a place of great [fun](fun.md), [trolling](troll.md), [toxicity](toxic.md) and [memes](meme.md). It was started in 2003 by [moot](moot.md) (Christopher Poole, born 1988). As most image boards, 4chan has a nice, oldschool minimalist look, even though it contains shitty [captchas](captcha.md) for posting and the site's code is [proprietary](proprietary.md). The site tolerates a great amount of [free speech](free_speech.md) up to the point of being regularly labeled "right-wing extremist site", though it actually censors a lot of stuff and bans for stupid reasons such as harmless [pedo](pedophilia.md) [jokes](jokes.md) are very common (speaking from experience) -- 4chan global rules for example PROHIBIT CRITICISING 4chan (LMAO, rule no. 8), doxxing and call for raids. Being a "rightist paradise" it is commonly seen as a rival to [reddit](reddit.md), aka the [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) paradise -- both forums hate each other to death. The discussion style is pretty nice, there are many nice stories and memes (e.g. the famous [greentexts](greentext.md)) coming from 4chan but it can also be a hugely depressing place just due to the shear number of retards with incorrect opinions.
|
4chan (https://4chan.org/, also 4cuck) is the most famous [image board](image_board.md), a website causing controversies by its low [censorship](censorship.md) and a place of great [fun](fun.md), [trolling](troll.md), [toxicity](toxic.md) and [memes](meme.md). Posters on the site are anonymous and call each other "Anons". It was started in 2003 by [moot](moot.md) (Christopher Poole, born 1988). As most image boards, 4chan has a nice, oldschool minimalist look, even though it contains shitty [captchas](captcha.md) for posting and the site's code is [proprietary](proprietary.md) (2024 update: [JavaScript](javascript.md) is needed for non-crippled experience). The site tolerates a great amount of [free speech](free_speech.md) up to the point of being regularly labeled "right-wing extremist site", though it actually censors a lot of stuff and bans for stupid reasons such as harmless [pedo](pedophilia.md) [jokes](jokes.md) are very common (speaking from experience) -- 4chan global rules for example PROHIBIT CRITICISING 4chan (LMAO, rule no. 8), doxxing and calls for raids. Being a "rightist paradise" it is commonly seen as a rival to [reddit](reddit.md), aka the [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) paradise -- both forums hate each other to death. The discussion style is pretty nice, there are many nice stories and memes (e.g. the famous [greentexts](greentext.md)) coming from 4chan but it can also be a hugely depressing place just due to the shear number of retards with incorrect opinions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{ Pre 2010 there used to be a cool 4chan wiki called Wikichan, now can be read at the Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20070218235405/http://wikichan.org/wiki/Main_Page. ~drummyfish }
|
{ Pre 2010 there used to be a cool 4chan wiki called Wikichan, now can be read at the Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20070218235405/http://wikichan.org/wiki/Main_Page. ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Just as reddit consists of subcommunities known as subreddits, 4chan consists of different boards (just as other image boards), each with given discussion topic and rules. The most (in)famous boards are likely *politically incorrect* AKA /pol/, where most of the american school shooters hang around, and *random* AKA /b/, the most active board, which is just a shitton of [meme](meme.md) shitposting, [porn](porn.md), [toxicity](toxic.md), [fun](fun.md), [trolling](troll.md) and retardedness.
|
Just as reddit consists of subcommunities known as subreddits, 4chan consists of different boards (just as other image boards), each with given discussion topic and rules. The most (in)famous boards are likely *politically incorrect* AKA /pol/, where most of the american school shooters hang around, and *random* AKA /b/, the most active board, which is just a shitton of [meme](meme.md) shitposting, [porn](porn.md), [toxicity](toxic.md), [fun](fun.md), [trolling](troll.md) and retardedness (lately it turned to almost 100% porn).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For us the most important part of 4chan is the technology board known as /g/ (for technoloGEE). Browsing /g/ can bring all kinds of emotion, it's a place of relative freedom and somewhat beautiful chaos where all people from absolute retards to geniuses argue about important and unimportant things, brands, tech news and memes, and constantly advise each other to kill themselves. Sometimes the place is pretty toxic and not good for mental health, actually it is more of a rule than an exception.
|
For us the most important part of 4chan is the technology board known as /g/ (for technoloGEE). Browsing /g/ can bring all kinds of emotion, it's a place of relative freedom and somewhat beautiful chaos where all people from absolute retards to geniuses argue about important and unimportant things, brands, tech news and memes, and constantly advise each other to kill themselves. Sometimes the place is pretty toxic and not good for mental health, actually it is more of a rule than an exception.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
UPDATE: As of 2022 /g/ became literally unreadable, ABANDON SHIP. The board became flooded with [capitalists](capitalism.md), cryptofascists, proprietary [shills](shill.md), [productivity](productivity_cult.md) freaks and other uber retards, it's really not worth reading anymore. You can still read good old threads on archives such as https://desuarchive.org/g/page/280004/. ALSO 2024 update: 4chan is also completely unusable now because it's [cuckflared](cloudflare.md) and posting requires unsolvable captchas (they are actually unsolvable, you must have PAID account to bypass it, so to post you now de facto have to pay). Lurking on some other more relaxed boards such as /x and /vr may still be cool, but in general accept that the site is dead, find something else.
|
UPDATE: As of 2022 /g/ became literally unreadable, ABANDON SHIP. The board became flooded with [capitalists](capitalism.md), cryptofascists, proprietary [shills](shill.md), [productivity](productivity_cult.md) freaks and other uber retards, it's really not worth reading anymore, it is pure, distilled consumerism, religious flame wars and diseases. You can still read good old threads on archives such as https://desuarchive.org/g/page/280004/. ALSO 2024 update: 4chan is also completely unusable now because it's [cuckflared](cloudflare.md) and posting requires unsolvable captchas (they are actually unsolvable, you must have PAID account to bypass it, so to post you now de facto have to pay). Lurking on some other more relaxed boards such as /x, /an or /vr may still be cool, but in general accept that the site is dead, find something else.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Despite dwelling slightly [underground](underground.md) -- maybe better said being isolated from the normie "safespace" [censornet](censorship.md) -- 4chan has really been very notably significant for the whole Internet [culture](culture.md), long [books](book.md) could be written about its [history](history.md), culture, unique, intricate social mechanism of its ways of communication and impact on the rest of the cyberspace; the "4chan experience" is one of the things that can't faithfully be described by words, it has to be lived. Just like reddit mixed some interesting concepts into a unique, yet more powerful combination that's more than a sum of its ingredients, so did 4chan -- yes, other boards are to be credited for this too, but 4chan is the flagship, the center of it all. Especially important seems to be the anonymity aspect, you never know who you are talking to, it's never clear if someone is [trolling](troll.md), serious, shilling, extremely dumb or something in between. There is no karma, no handles, no profile pictures, no upvotes (at best there are numbers of replies), no post history, no account age, you have to rely on judging people by unusual attributes, for example by the style of their talk, their knowledge of the [lore](lore.md) and latest [memes](meme.md), by how they format their posts (e.g. the infamously hated empty lines), what images they attach (and what they're file names are), as these are the only clues. A thread on 4chan isn't something with a clear goal, you don't know if someone is asking a question because he wants a genuine answer or because he's just bored and wants to see funny answers, or if he's posting a bait and is trying to trigger others, so each discussion is a bit of a game, you're trying to guess what's going on. A famous post, for example, had itself heard that the poster despises translations of books and always reads any book in its original language despite not understanding a word of it, and that he already read works such as Don Quixote and Les Miserables in their respective languages without knowing what they were about -- this stupidity combined with extreme determination and dedication captures part of what makes 4chan what it is. Also everything is temporary, every thread and image is deleted in a short time, which is an important factor too, everything is constantly in motion, people have to react quickly, there is no turning back, reactions are quick and genuine, if you miss something it's gone. Also the image memes themselves show how [art](art.md) (who cares if low) evolves if completely unrestrained, anyone can try to spawn a new meme or download anyone else's posted meme, repost it or [modify](remix_culture.md) it, copyright mostly [de facto](de_facto.md) won't apply as the authors are unknown; bad works are filtered out while good ones remain simply by making others save them and keep reposting them, it's art without authors, separated from the people, evolving completely on its own, purely by its intrinsic attributes, unconstrained evolution at work right before our eyes -- this is a seriously scientifically [interesting](interesting.md) stuff.
|
Despite dwelling slightly [underground](underground.md) -- maybe better said being isolated from the normie "safespace" [censornet](censorship.md) -- 4chan has really been very notably significant for the whole Internet [culture](culture.md), long [books](book.md) could be written about its [history](history.md), culture, unique, intricate social mechanism of its ways of communication and impact on the rest of the cyberspace; the "4chan experience" is one of the things that can't faithfully be described by words, it has to be lived. Just like reddit mixed some interesting concepts into a unique, yet more powerful combination that's more than a sum of its ingredients, so did 4chan -- yes, other boards are to be credited for this too, but 4chan is the flagship, the center of it all. Especially important seems to be the anonymity aspect, you never know who you are talking to, it's never clear if someone is [trolling](troll.md), serious, shilling, extremely dumb or something in between. There is no karma, no handles, no profile pictures, no upvotes (at best there are numbers of replies), no post history, no account age, you have to rely on judging people by unusual attributes, for example by the style of their talk, their knowledge of the [lore](lore.md) and latest [memes](meme.md), by how they format their posts (e.g. the infamously hated empty lines), what images they attach (and what they're file names are), as these are the only clues. A thread on 4chan isn't something with a clear goal, you don't know if someone is asking a question because he wants a genuine answer or because he's just bored and wants to see funny answers, or if he's posting a bait and is trying to trigger others, so each discussion is a bit of a game, you're trying to guess what's going on. A famous post, for example, had itself heard that the poster despises translations of books and always reads any book in its original language despite not understanding a word of it, and that he already read works such as Don Quixote and Les Miserables in their respective languages without knowing what they were about -- this stupidity combined with extreme determination and dedication captures part of what makes 4chan what it is. Also everything is temporary, every thread and image is deleted in a short time, which is an important factor too, everything is constantly in motion, people have to react quickly, there is no turning back, reactions are quick and genuine, if you miss something it's gone. Also the image memes themselves show how [art](art.md) (who cares if low) evolves if completely unrestrained, anyone can try to spawn a new meme or download anyone else's posted meme, repost it or [modify](remix_culture.md) it, copyright mostly [de facto](de_facto.md) won't apply as the authors are unknown; bad works are filtered out while good ones remain simply by making others save them and keep reposting them, it's art without authors, separated from the people, evolving completely on its own, purely by its intrinsic attributes, unconstrained evolution at work right before our eyes -- this is a seriously scientifically [interesting](interesting.md) stuff.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Anarch is a [LRS](lrs.md)/[suckless](suckless.md), [free as in freedom](free_software.md) ([public domain](public_domain.md)) first man shooter [game](game.md) similar to [Doom](doom.md), created completely from scratch by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md). It has been designed to follow the LRS principles very closely and set an example of how games, and software in general, should be written. It also tries to be compatible with principles of [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md), i.e. it promotes [anarchism](anarchism.md), anti-[capitalism](capitalism.md), pacifism etc.
|
Anarch is a [LRS](lrs.md)/[suckless](suckless.md), [free as in freedom](free_software.md) ([public domain](public_domain.md)) first man shooter [game](game.md) similar to [Doom](doom.md), created completely from scratch by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md). It has been designed to follow the LRS principles very closely and set an example of how games, and software in general, should be written. It also tries to be compatible with principles of [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md), i.e. it promotes [anarchism](anarchism.md), anti-[capitalism](capitalism.md), pacifism etc.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
There are now also additional official mods available for the game that for example add multiplayer, increase texture resolution, improve the overall look, allow recording demos, replace assets with those from [Freedoom](freedoom.md) and so on.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The repo is available at https://codeberg.org/drummyfish/Anarch or https://gitlab.com/drummyfish/anarch. Some info about the game can also be found at the [libregamewiki](lgw.md): https://libregamewiki.org/Anarch. The 1.0 version was released on 1st December 2020, it was officially in the making since September 2019, but we may also see the inception of the game to be the start of [raycastlib](raycastlib.md) development in 2018.
|
The repo is available at https://codeberg.org/drummyfish/Anarch or https://gitlab.com/drummyfish/anarch. Some info about the game can also be found at the [libregamewiki](lgw.md): https://libregamewiki.org/Anarch. The 1.0 version was released on 1st December 2020, it was officially in the making since September 2019, but we may also see the inception of the game to be the start of [raycastlib](raycastlib.md) development in 2018.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
2
books.md
2
books.md
|
|
@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Here there will be a constantly WIP list of [books](book.md) that might be of in
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{ Let's aim for quality rather than quantity here, don't put any book that has some connection to our cause here, but rather the ones you've read and which you judge as a quality book that enriched you in some way. ~drummyfish }
|
{ Let's aim for quality rather than quantity here, don't put any book that has some connection to our cause here, but rather the ones you've read and which you judge as a quality book that enriched you in some way. ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **An Illustrated History of 151 Video Games** (2014): Though being a bit of a modern, normie book with some shit here and there, overall it's actually a quite nice compendium on video games, very good for example for your inawoods offline library, to cover most of the gaming topic. It covers games from the earliest up until the end of the good gaming era, with a mini review of the most significant ones, including many screenshots and interesting trivia. There are also sprite sheets, game maps and articles about notable gaming systems. It evokes a bit of that 90's kid's nostalgia of reading about games in paper magazines. (As always, try to get older editions, newer ones will probably be more shitty.)
|
- **An Illustrated History of 151 Video Games** (2014): Though being a bit of a modern, normie book with some shit here and there (a bit shitty writing style TBH), overall it's actually a quite nice compendium on video games, very good for example for your inawoods offline library, to cover most of the gaming topic. It covers games from the earliest up until the end of the good gaming era, with a mini review of the most significant ones, including many screenshots and interesting trivia. There are also sprite sheets, game maps and articles about notable gaming systems. It evokes a bit of that 90's kid's nostalgia of reading about games in paper magazines. (As always, try to get older editions, newer ones will probably be more shitty.)
|
||||||
- **Blackout** (2017, Elsberg): Fiction, telling a story of a large blackout in Europe that shows to really be caused by [bloated](bloat.md) tech. For [collapse](collapse.md) enjoyers this is an interesting read if only for the detailed description of the consequences a sudden loss of electric power.
|
- **Blackout** (2017, Elsberg): Fiction, telling a story of a large blackout in Europe that shows to really be caused by [bloated](bloat.md) tech. For [collapse](collapse.md) enjoyers this is an interesting read if only for the detailed description of the consequences a sudden loss of electric power.
|
||||||
- **Day of the Triffids** (1951, Wyndham): Excellent sci-fi in which civilization comes to an end due to a disaster (won't spoil), very nice for collapse preps or just people enjoying a great story narrated in captivating way :-) The movie is a joke, don't even search for it. Also other books by Wyndham are awesome.
|
- **Day of the Triffids** (1951, Wyndham): Excellent sci-fi in which civilization comes to an end due to a disaster (won't spoil), very nice for collapse preps or just people enjoying a great story narrated in captivating way :-) The movie is a joke, don't even search for it. Also other books by Wyndham are awesome.
|
||||||
- **[Einstein](einstein.md): His Life and Universe** (Isaacson, 2008): [Einstein](einstein.md)'s biography, quite a nice read about a pretty awesome man who's image has been so distorted by the mainstream shit.
|
- **[Einstein](einstein.md): His Life and Universe** (Isaacson, 2008): [Einstein](einstein.md)'s biography, quite a nice read about a pretty awesome man who's image has been so distorted by the mainstream shit.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
2
c.md
2
c.md
|
|
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ C was developed in 1972 at [Bell Labs](bell_labs.md) alongside the [Unix](unix.m
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Standards
|
## Standards
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
C is not a single language, there have been a few standards over the years since its inception in 1970s. The notable standards and versions are:
|
C is not a single language, there have been a few standards over the years since its inception in 1970s. The standard defines two major parts: the base language and standard library. Notable standards and versions are:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **K&R C**: C as described by its inventors in the book *The C Programming Language*, before official standardization. This is kind of too ancient nowadays.
|
- **K&R C**: C as described by its inventors in the book *The C Programming Language*, before official standardization. This is kind of too ancient nowadays.
|
||||||
- **C89/C90 (ANSI/ISO C)**: First fully standardized version, usable even today, many hardcore C programmers stick to this version so as to enjoy maximum compiler support.
|
- **C89/C90 (ANSI/ISO C)**: First fully standardized version, usable even today, many hardcore C programmers stick to this version so as to enjoy maximum compiler support.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Potentially supplemental articles to this tutorial are:
|
||||||
- [C pitfalls](c_pitfalls.md)
|
- [C pitfalls](c_pitfalls.md)
|
||||||
- [memory management](memory_management.md)
|
- [memory management](memory_management.md)
|
||||||
- [optimization](optimization.md)
|
- [optimization](optimization.md)
|
||||||
|
- [SAF](saf.md)
|
||||||
- ...
|
- ...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## About C And Programming
|
## About C And Programming
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -135,10 +135,11 @@ Capitalist brainwashing is pretty sophisticated -- unlike with centralized oppre
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- *"Capitalism is freedom."* -- This is of course a complete twist of the word freedom: capitalism promotes freedom of market which goes against the freedom of people. I.e. the freedom enabled by capitalism is the freedom to abuse others; the freedom to restrict freedoms of others, which is of almost the polar opposite of genuine freedom.
|
- *"Capitalism is freedom."* -- This is of course a complete twist of the word freedom: capitalism promotes freedom of market which goes against the freedom of people. I.e. the freedom enabled by capitalism is the freedom to abuse others; the freedom to restrict freedoms of others, which is of almost the polar opposite of genuine freedom.
|
||||||
- *"In capitalism everyone can make it if he only works hard."* -- This is firstly of course not even logically possible, it's just as claiming that everyone can win the Olympic games; to reach the top in an extremely competitive system not only do you have to work hard, you also have to be born with the right talent, in the right place, to the right family, and be immensely lucky to be in right places in right times and make correct guess decisions in situations in which it is impossible to know the correct decision. Even if you work 24/7 without sleep, there will be thousands of others who do the same, your success is a pure bet on lottery. **Capitalist fairy tales make heavy use of the [survivorship bias](survivorship_bias.md)** -- you will see movies only about the successful people who are asked how they achieved success and who answer along the lines "I just worked hard". Indeed they did, but this doesn't imply that anyone working hard will succeed, this is the same as taking an advice from a lottery winner; if you ask a lottery winner how he won the lottery, he will simply say "I bet all I had on a random number". Following such advice is of course just about the worse decision you can make. If everyone can make it, why doesn't everyone do it, why don't we have a world consisting exclusively of billionaires?
|
- *"In capitalism everyone can make it if he only works hard."* -- This is firstly of course not even logically possible, it's just as claiming that everyone can win the Olympic games; to reach the top in an extremely competitive system not only do you have to work hard, you also have to be born with the right talent, in the right place, to the right family, and be immensely lucky to be in right places in right times and make correct guess decisions in situations in which it is impossible to know the correct decision. Even if you work 24/7 without sleep, there will be thousands of others who do the same, your success is a pure bet on lottery. **Capitalist fairy tales make heavy use of the [survivorship bias](survivorship_bias.md)** -- you will see movies only about the successful people who are asked how they achieved success and who answer along the lines "I just worked hard". Indeed they did, but this doesn't imply that anyone working hard will succeed, this is the same as taking an advice from a lottery winner; if you ask a lottery winner how he won the lottery, he will simply say "I bet all I had on a random number". Following such advice is of course just about the worse decision you can make. If everyone can make it, why doesn't everyone do it, why don't we have a world consisting exclusively of billionaires?
|
||||||
- *"Capitalism just works, capitalism is natural, capitalism means progress etc."* -- **Capitalism doesn't work, it's just hard to get rid of.** Progress isn't dependent on capitalism, progress can't be stopped and will be here even without capitalism. If it "works and is natural", then it works and is natural natural in the same way as for example cancer or wars. This doesn't mean we should support it or see it as something positive. Most of other similar lies are discussed in sections above.
|
- *"Capitalism just works, capitalism is natural, capitalism means [progress](progress.md) etc."* -- **Capitalism doesn't work, it's just hard to get rid of.** Progress isn't dependent on capitalism, progress can't be stopped and will be here even without capitalism, on the contrary, capitalism mostly smothers the good kind of progress, e.g. by inventing intellectual property it prevents full utilization of us having the technology for unlimited sharing and reusing of information. If it "works and is natural", then it works and is natural natural in the same way as for example cancer or wars. This doesn't mean we should support it or see it as something positive. Most of other similar lies are discussed in sections above.
|
||||||
- Fairy tales about about the rich capitalist altruist: you will hear stories about famous capitalists that paint them as nice guys who give to poor for free, who do manual work despite not having to etc. This is just part of cult of personality propaganda and applying cheap populist tricks to deceive masses. A rich guy giving $100 to a poor kid on camera is an extreme powerful marketing that costs $100, which for a billionaire is of course a laughable cost. The fact is that every billionaire is the best player of the most dirty game humanity has invented and researching any such guy reveals, basically in 100% of cases, that he was in fact the worst imaginable psychopath -- Edison killed animals with electric current as part of marketing, the owner of McDonald's stole the idea and know-how from McDonald brothers ALONG WITH their own name, similar thing happened with KFC, Steve Jobs was infamous for his psychological pressure on workers equating torture, the working condition's in Ford's factories were basically the same as those for black African slaves, etcetc. **Trying to find a rich man that's good is like trying to find a shark who's a vegetarian.**
|
- *"Capitalism produces best quality products for lowest prices."* -- An extremely prevailing myth that is a complete 100% lie, it is enough to take a look at anything produces in capitalism and before it, for example in countries that switched from "communism" to capitalism. Capitalist products last about 1% of the time they normally would due to artificial obsolescence and consumerism, they are littered with [DRM](drm.md), [bloat](bloat.md), surveillance technology, made from cheapest material, designed to break, show ads and so on. Capitalism aims to produce the lowest quality product that will just barely be accepted, anything better is wasting profit. { As a curiosity compare for example movie dubbings in countries during "communist" and later capitalist eras (e.g. Hungary or Czechia) -- ask the people who live there, they will tell you the old dubbing was art, made with care, the new dubbing is a hasted shit produced as cheaply and quickly as possible. ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
|
- Fairy tales about about the rich "capitalist altruist": you will hear stories about famous capitalists that paint them as nice guys who give to poor for free, who do manual work despite not having to etc. This is just part of cult of personality propaganda and applying cheap populist tricks to deceive masses. A rich guy giving $100 to a poor kid on camera is an extreme powerful marketing that costs $100, which for a billionaire is of course a laughable cost. The fact is that every billionaire is the best player of the most dirty game humanity has invented and researching any such guy reveals, basically in 100% of cases, that he was in fact the worst imaginable psychopath -- Edison killed animals with electric current as part of marketing, the owner of McDonald's stole the idea and know-how from McDonald brothers ALONG WITH their own name, similar thing happened with KFC, Steve Jobs was infamous for his psychological pressure on workers equating torture, the working condition's in Ford's factories were basically the same as those for black African slaves, etcetc. **Trying to find a rich man that's good is like trying to find a shark who's a vegetarian.**
|
||||||
- *"Capitalism isn't perfect but it's the best system we know."*: complete [bullshit](bullshit.md), capitalism is probably the worst system that there ever was. See this whole article.
|
- *"Capitalism isn't perfect but it's the best system we know."*: complete [bullshit](bullshit.md), capitalism is probably the worst system that there ever was. See this whole article.
|
||||||
- *"Successful capitalists are the most intelligent people."*: on the contrary, mostly the stupidest people become successful -- success in capitalism depends mostly on luck and lack of moral obstacles, i.e. doing whatever it takes to succeed such as stabbing friends in the back, public lying, exploitation of workers etc. High intelligence is actually a disadvantage in this manner as it makes one see all the negative consequences of his behavior, a smart man sees that by engaging in capitalism he is not just hurting and even killing other people, but even e.g. working towards destruction of art, culture, living environment and possibly life itself. Being a successful businessman in capitalism is like steering a plane full of people, including oneself, towards ground -- only an idiot can do it.
|
- *"Successful capitalists are the most intelligent people."*: on the contrary, mostly the stupidest people become successful -- success in capitalism depends mostly on luck and lack of moral obstacles, i.e. doing whatever it takes to succeed such as stabbing friends in the back, public lying, exploitation of workers etc. High intelligence is actually a disadvantage in this manner as it makes one see all the negative consequences of his behavior, a smart man sees that by engaging in capitalism he is not just hurting and even killing other people, but even e.g. working towards destruction of art, culture, living environment and possibly life itself. Being a successful businessman in capitalism is like steering a plane full of people, including oneself, towards ground -- only an idiot can do it.
|
||||||
- TODO: moar
|
- TODO: moar
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## So What To Replace Capitalism With?
|
## So What To Replace Capitalism With?
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
2
css.md
2
css.md
|
|
@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ Back in the boomer web days -- basically before the glorious year 2000 -- there
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Correct, [LRS](lrs.md) approved attitude towards this piece of [bloat](bloat.md)**: as a minimalist should you avoid CSS like the devil and never use it? Usual LRS recommendations apply but, just in case, let's reiterate. Use your brain, maximize [good](less_retarded_society.md), minimize damage, just make it so that no one can ever say "oh no, I wish this site didn't have CSS". You CAN use CSS on your site, but it mustn't become any burden, only something optional that will make life better for those using a browser supporting CSS, i.e. **your site MUSTN'T RELY on CSS**, CSS mustn't be its [dependency](dependency.md), the site has to work perfectly fine without it (remember that many browsers, especially the minimalist ones not under any corporation's control, don't even support CSS), the site must not be crippled without a style, i.e. firstly design your site without CSS and only add CSS as an optional improvement. Do not make your HTML bow to CSS, i.e. don't let CSS make you add tons of divs and classes, make HTML first and then make CSS bow to the HTML. Light CSS is better than heavy one. If you have a single page, embed CSS right into it ([KISS](kiss.md), site is self contained and browser doesn't have to download extra files for your site) and make it short to save bandwidth on downloading your site. Don't use heavy CSS features like animation, blurs, [color](color.md) transitions or wild repositioning, save the [CPU](cpu.md), save the planet (:D). Etcetc.
|
**Correct, [LRS](lrs.md) approved attitude towards this piece of [bloat](bloat.md)**: as a minimalist should you avoid CSS like the devil and never use it? Usual LRS recommendations apply but, just in case, let's reiterate. Use your brain, maximize [good](less_retarded_society.md), minimize damage, just make it so that no one can ever say "oh no, I wish this site didn't have CSS". You CAN use CSS on your site, but it mustn't become any burden, only something optional that will make life better for those using a browser supporting CSS, i.e. **your site MUSTN'T RELY on CSS**, CSS mustn't be its [dependency](dependency.md), the site has to work perfectly fine without it (remember that many browsers, especially the minimalist ones not under any corporation's control, don't even support CSS), the site must not be crippled without a style, i.e. firstly design your site without CSS and only add CSS as an optional improvement. Do not make your HTML bow to CSS, i.e. don't let CSS make you add tons of divs and classes, make HTML first and then make CSS bow to the HTML. Light CSS is better than heavy one. If you have a single page, embed CSS right into it ([KISS](kiss.md), site is self contained and browser doesn't have to download extra files for your site) and make it short to save bandwidth on downloading your site. Don't use heavy CSS features like animation, blurs, [color](color.md) transitions or wild repositioning, save the [CPU](cpu.md), save the planet (:D). Etcetc.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**PRO TIP: you can achieve some basic formatting completely without CSS** (i.e. even without the `style` attribute) -- for some things you can use the old HTML visual attributes. Whether it's better to do it this way or rather use CSS depends on situation, but it's good to have a choice, this may allow you to just completely avoid CSS (e.g. to get to the "nocss" website club) and maybe have better chance of supporting ancient browsers. Though some of the attributes are already deprecated in HTML5, browsers still support them and the worst that can happen is that they simply won't work. It's probably also possible to use CSS and also the HTML attributes as a fallback. The visual attributes include `bgcolor`, `border`, `color`, `cols`, `height`, `rows`, `shape`, `size`, `width` etc. You can also use tables to give the page a layout (this is how it used to be done back in the day). And of course you may use images for visuals as well, but that may already be an inferior, more bloated solution.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
TODO: more more more
|
TODO: more more more
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## How It Works
|
## How It Works
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Data hoarding means larger than normal focus on collecting data, often in bigger
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Here let be an advice to the good data hoarder.
|
Here let be an advice to the good data hoarder.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- As always: in general **minimize the [bad](bad.md), maximize the [good](good.md)**. Size, cost, [maintenance](maintenance.md), time, anxiety and other trouble are bad. Value of the data, its durability, independence, freedom etc. are good. **Know what and why you're doing it** -- you probably don't want to hoard famous Hollywood movies that you can pirate from 1000 sites at any time, there's no point in that, you want to save files so as to back them up, have them ready in case the Internet stops existing, save something that's likely to be censored and so on.
|
- As always: in general **minimize the [bad](bad.md), maximize the [good](good.md)**. Size, cost, [maintenance](maintenance.md), time, anxiety and other trouble are bad. Value of the data, its durability, independence, freedom etc. are good. **Know what and why you're doing it** -- you probably don't want to hoard famous Hollywood movies that you can pirate from 1000 sites at any time, there's no point in that, you want to save files so as to back them up, have them ready in case the Internet stops existing, save something that's likely to be censored and so on. Basically imagine the difference between someone collecting useful objects and someone filling his house up to the roof with complete junk -- the same kind of thing's happening with data.
|
||||||
- **Collect small data of high value**, maximize the value/size ratio: typically save a lot of text data, vector images are fine too, be more picky with bitmap images and things like video always have to be considered extremely well, curated and edited to shrink their size. **Keeping your collection as small as possible is the number one priority** as the size is what makes the difference between having a pocket USB stick that can be quickly and easily backed up on any file sharing website or a CD vs maintaining a [RAID](raid.md) of backups, consuming new CPUs and spending most of your hoarding time just keeping your collection alive.
|
- **Collect small data of high value**, maximize the value/size ratio: typically save a lot of text data, vector images are fine too, be more picky with bitmap images and things like video always have to be considered extremely well, curated and edited to shrink their size. **Keeping your collection as small as possible is the number one priority** as the size is what makes the difference between having a pocket USB stick that can be quickly and easily backed up on any file sharing website or a CD vs maintaining a [RAID](raid.md) of backups, consuming new CPUs and spending most of your hoarding time just keeping your collection alive.
|
||||||
- **Hoard physical books** and similar oldschool data such as photos, vinyl records -- not only they often have advantages over electronic data, such as being storable without electricity and lasting longer, they are also usually of better quality and higher value. Internet data are full of junk and noise because it's a cheap medium -- a paper book on the other hand has to carefully choose what to include, i.e. it already did this part of the job for you.
|
- **Hoard physical books** and similar oldschool data such as photos, vinyl records -- not only they often have advantages over electronic data, such as being storable without electricity and lasting longer, they are also usually of better quality and higher value. Internet data are full of junk and noise because it's a cheap medium -- a paper book on the other hand has to carefully choose what to include, i.e. it already did this part of the job for you.
|
||||||
- **Use appropriate formats and quality**: if the value of the data is text, save it as txt (even if you found it in pdf), if it's a black and white scan, save it as black and white image (no need for RGB), if it's a diagram, find vector version of it and save that, if it's a meme whose entertaining value will be preserved even at half resolution, don't save it in 1080K resolution, save it at lowest acceptable quality etc. Use simple, common file formats that can be handled by free software, do NOT use proprietary formats or formats that are extremely complicated if you can at all avoid it. Go to great lengths to extract valuable data out of shitty formats: for example if you find a vlog video whose main value is in what's being said and not the video itself, rather find and store the video text transcript than the video itself (it takes much less space, can be searched, indexed, printed and backed up on paper, ...), or, as the next best thing, extract only audio and compress that so that it's just barely understandable.
|
- **Use appropriate formats and quality**: if the value of the data is text, save it as txt (even if you found it in pdf), if it's a black and white scan, save it as black and white image (no need for RGB), if it's a diagram, find vector version of it and save that, if it's a meme whose entertaining value will be preserved even at half resolution, don't save it in 1080K resolution, save it at lowest acceptable quality etc. Use simple, common file formats that can be handled by free software, do NOT use proprietary formats or formats that are extremely complicated if you can at all avoid it. Go to great lengths to extract valuable data out of shitty formats: for example if you find a vlog video whose main value is in what's being said and not the video itself, rather find and store the video text transcript than the video itself (it takes much less space, can be searched, indexed, printed and backed up on paper, ...), or, as the next best thing, extract only audio and compress that so that it's just barely understandable.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -7,12 +7,14 @@ Disease is a bad state of living organism's health caused by failure of its inne
|
||||||
- [autism](autism.md)
|
- [autism](autism.md)
|
||||||
- [cancer](cancer.md)
|
- [cancer](cancer.md)
|
||||||
- [capitalism](capitalism.md)
|
- [capitalism](capitalism.md)
|
||||||
|
- crippling [purity checking](purity_checking.md)
|
||||||
- chronic downloading
|
- chronic downloading
|
||||||
- citation addiction, also known as [pseudoskeptic](pseudoskepticism.md)'s disease^[1][2][3]
|
- citation addiction, also known as [pseudoskeptic](pseudoskepticism.md)'s disease^[1][2][3]
|
||||||
- [data hoarding](data_hoarding.md)
|
- [data hoarding](data_hoarding.md)
|
||||||
- [depression](depression.md)
|
- [depression](depression.md)
|
||||||
- [egoism](egoism.md)
|
- [egoism](egoism.md)
|
||||||
- [Emacs](emacs.md)
|
- [Emacs](emacs.md)
|
||||||
|
- excessive [lurking](lurking.md)
|
||||||
- [furry](furry.md) disorder
|
- [furry](furry.md) disorder
|
||||||
- [homosexuality](gay.md)
|
- [homosexuality](gay.md)
|
||||||
- hopping:
|
- hopping:
|
||||||
|
|
@ -31,7 +33,9 @@ Disease is a bad state of living organism's health caused by failure of its inne
|
||||||
- [nationalism](nationalism.md)
|
- [nationalism](nationalism.md)
|
||||||
- [NPC](npc.md) disease
|
- [NPC](npc.md) disease
|
||||||
- [object obsession](oop.md)
|
- [object obsession](oop.md)
|
||||||
- obsessive [privacy](privacy.md) obsession
|
- obsessive [shitposting](shitpost.md) (for example writing a wiki)
|
||||||
|
- [privacy](privacy.md) hysteria
|
||||||
|
- [pedophobia](pedophobia.md)
|
||||||
- [pride](pride.md)
|
- [pride](pride.md)
|
||||||
- [productivity](productivity_cult.md)/robotization
|
- [productivity](productivity_cult.md)/robotization
|
||||||
- [retardation](retarded.md)
|
- [retardation](retarded.md)
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
16
egoism.md
16
egoism.md
|
|
@ -5,12 +5,18 @@
|
||||||
Some signs of egoism include:
|
Some signs of egoism include:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Drawing someone's own face (or letting someone else do it) and then using it for a profile picture**. "Modern" soydevs on twitter and blogs are so guilty of this, especially the "game devs" with pixel art portraits etc., it's so narcissistic and cringe you just want to puke. Why would anyone humble even allow someone to make a statue of him, allowing the danger of cult of personality and becoming a [hero](hero_culture.md)? Why the fuck do people obsess about forcing their ugly faces onto others?
|
- **Drawing someone's own face (or letting someone else do it) and then using it for a profile picture**. "Modern" soydevs on twitter and blogs are so guilty of this, especially the "game devs" with pixel art portraits etc., it's so narcissistic and cringe you just want to puke. Why would anyone humble even allow someone to make a statue of him, allowing the danger of cult of personality and becoming a [hero](hero_culture.md)? Why the fuck do people obsess about forcing their ugly faces onto others?
|
||||||
- **Decorating one's body obsessively**, especially with [tattoos](tattoo.md), wild hairstyles, clothes that serves other purpose than pure protection from weather, for example a **[suit](suit.md)** etc.
|
- **Decorating one's body obsessively, trying to adopt an "image"**, especially with [tattoos](tattoo.md), wild hairstyles, clothes that serves other purpose than pure protection from weather, for example a **[suit](suit.md)** etc. A good man will never try to look much different from how he'd look naturally, he will minimize effort put into caring about looks and will try to avoid the danger of applying manipulative psychological tricks such as appeal by looks.
|
||||||
- **Putting one's name in (or near) the title of his creation**: one of the most famous examples being the *Shit Faggot's Game Of Civilization*. Yes, [Linux](linux.md) counts too; even though [Linus](torwalds.md) didn't name it himself, he just waited for someone else to do it for him and then didn't protest; he also joked about it, trying to make it look OK, though without success (see below).
|
- **Putting one's name in (or near) the title of his creation**: one of the most famous examples being the *Shit Faggot's Game Of Civilization*. Yes, [Linux](linux.md) counts too; even though [Linus](torwalds.md) didn't name it himself, he just waited for someone else to do it for him and then didn't protest; he also joked about it, trying to make it look OK, though without success (see below).
|
||||||
- **Egoism masked as [joking](jokes.md)**, i.e. doing something egoistic and then pretending to do it for the sake of a joke; for example in the book *World of Warcraft Diary* the author *X* puts a huge quote of himself on one page and jokingly writes under it *"X quoting X in his own book"* -- hahaha we laughed ok? It's not egoism, it's done for a joke, BTW the quote will stay there. The author here thinks he is smart as he think this achieves two things: promoting himself while also making him look like someone with a sense of humor. In fact it just makes him look like the most egocentric bastard.
|
- **Egoism masked as [joking](jokes.md)**, i.e. doing something egoistic and then pretending to do it for the sake of a joke; for example in the book *World of Warcraft Diary* the author *X* puts a huge quote of himself on one page and jokingly writes under it *"X quoting X in his own book"* -- hahaha we laughed ok? It's not egoism, it's done for a joke, BTW the quote will stay there. The author here thinks he is smart as he think this achieves two things: promoting himself while also making him look like someone with a sense of humor. In fact it just makes him look like the most egocentric bastard.
|
||||||
- **[Assertiveness](assertiveness.md)**, also saying shit like "to love others you first have to love yourself" etc., honestly I don't know who comes up with such crap lol.
|
- **[Assertiveness](assertiveness.md)**.
|
||||||
|
- **Giving oneself special names**. Making a quick Internet handle is cool for practical purposes, inventing an artistic name or even changing it legally is just an inflated ego.
|
||||||
|
- **Talking about oneself too much**.
|
||||||
- **Being a [capitalist](capitalism.md)**; by definition a capitalist only cares about himself, capitalist is incapable of love or wanting any benefit for anyone else than himself, he only benefits others if he sees it will somehow lead to his own benefit in the future (this applies even to for example to caring about his own family etc.).
|
- **Being a [capitalist](capitalism.md)**; by definition a capitalist only cares about himself, capitalist is incapable of love or wanting any benefit for anyone else than himself, he only benefits others if he sees it will somehow lead to his own benefit in the future (this applies even to for example to caring about his own family etc.).
|
||||||
- **Using licenses that require giving credit**, such as [CC-BY-SA](cc_by_sa.md).
|
- **Using licenses that require giving credit**, such as [CC-BY-SA](cc_by_sa.md).
|
||||||
- **"Personal pronouns".**
|
- **Arriving late (bad timekeeping)**: by arriving late you're wasting the time of others and saving your own time, implying you think your time is more important, it's basically the same as physically beating someone. A good man will plan to arrive at least half an hour earlier so that even if he gets late, he'll still be on time, and if by some extreme miracle he still arrives late, he must pay the other one money or give him some other gift, for example free sex in case of woman.
|
||||||
- **Making (or allowing others to make) art that glorifies you**, e.g. documentaries, books etc.
|
- **"Personal pronouns".** Also inventing weird sexes and identities for oneself.
|
||||||
- ...
|
- **Making (or allowing others to make) art that glorifies you**, e.g. documentaries, books etc. You always have to oppose making any documentary, movie, statue and other kinds of works that would glorify you, even just slightly.
|
||||||
|
- **Being a celebrity**: this one without any exceptions. A well known man may not necessarily be a celebrity, but it is almost always the case, it would have to be someone who became famous while trying as hard as possible to not become famous. No, that one favorite celebrity of yours is not an exception to this. No, not even when he looks like a good man and when you've seen documentaries in which everyone said he's a humble man and when you've read he gives money to charity and hugs trees and saves puppies and feeds children in Africa.
|
||||||
|
- ...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Remember, **to love others you mustn't love yourself too much**, it helps if you hate yourself. Ideally you should love everyone equally, yourself and others too, but by loving yourself more you are hurting others while loving yourself less you only hurt yourself -- a truly [selfless](selflessness.md) man will rather choose to hurt himself than others, so it's always better to try to love yourself less.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -202,7 +202,8 @@ Bear in mind the main purpose of this quiz is for you to test your understanding
|
||||||
98. What's the principle of [CPU](cpu.md) [cache](cache.md)? How exactly does it speed up programs? Under what conditions will the cache work well? I.e. how should a program ideally behave to make maximum use of the cache?
|
98. What's the principle of [CPU](cpu.md) [cache](cache.md)? How exactly does it speed up programs? Under what conditions will the cache work well? I.e. how should a program ideally behave to make maximum use of the cache?
|
||||||
99. If you answer "yes" to this question, will you have lied?
|
99. If you answer "yes" to this question, will you have lied?
|
||||||
100. Form a word by answering each following sentences with one letter. Binary number 1011 in hexadecimal. Base of natural logarithm. *x = min(max(0,t - 1),1)*, *y = 2 - t for 1 <= t <= 2 otherwise t mod 1*, *t* goes from 0 to 3. Number whose square is -1. `'U' - 'T' + 'R'`.
|
100. Form a word by answering each following sentences with one letter. Binary number 1011 in hexadecimal. Base of natural logarithm. *x = min(max(0,t - 1),1)*, *y = 2 - t for 1 <= t <= 2 otherwise t mod 1*, *t* goes from 0 to 3. Number whose square is -1. `'U' - 'T' + 'R'`.
|
||||||
101. Did you enjoy this quiz?
|
101. In C this `float x = 16777216; printf("%d\n",x == (x + 1));` outputs `1` (or at least it is possible) -- what the fuck. How can a number equal itself plus one? Explain what's going on here.
|
||||||
|
102. Did you enjoy this quiz?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Answers
|
### Answers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -307,7 +308,8 @@ sin(x) / cos(x) - log2(2) = tg(x) - 1*, so we get *tg(x) >= 1*. So that will hol
|
||||||
98. Cache is a small memory placed between the CPU and main memory (RAM), it is a very fast type of memory, faster than the main memory, but it's also much smaller than main memory. The idea is that programs typically do a lot of work in some small region of main memory, they keep reading and writing the same (or nearby) memory cell(s) over and over and only after a while move somewhere else. So once the program starts a work in some memory area, the cache can load that area, let the program do its work very quickly in the cache, and then (when the program moves elsewhere) copy the results back from the cache to the memory. It's similar to downloading a file from the Internet to the disk, then editing the file locally and later on uploading it back. However the cache will be effective only if the assumption we made hold, i.e. if the program really mostly works in small areas of memory and makes minimum of long jumps, so if a program wants to fully utilize the cache, it should try to minimize these long jumps (for example by putting related data close to each other).
|
98. Cache is a small memory placed between the CPU and main memory (RAM), it is a very fast type of memory, faster than the main memory, but it's also much smaller than main memory. The idea is that programs typically do a lot of work in some small region of main memory, they keep reading and writing the same (or nearby) memory cell(s) over and over and only after a while move somewhere else. So once the program starts a work in some memory area, the cache can load that area, let the program do its work very quickly in the cache, and then (when the program moves elsewhere) copy the results back from the cache to the memory. It's similar to downloading a file from the Internet to the disk, then editing the file locally and later on uploading it back. However the cache will be effective only if the assumption we made hold, i.e. if the program really mostly works in small areas of memory and makes minimum of long jumps, so if a program wants to fully utilize the cache, it should try to minimize these long jumps (for example by putting related data close to each other).
|
||||||
99. There is no correct answering with either "yes" or "no" (this is therefore the correct answer). The question can be reworded as: *Is "yes" the wrong answer to this question?*, which can be reworded as: *Is "no" the correct answer to this question?* If we try both possible answers -- "yes" and "no" -- we find neither works.
|
99. There is no correct answering with either "yes" or "no" (this is therefore the correct answer). The question can be reworded as: *Is "yes" the wrong answer to this question?*, which can be reworded as: *Is "no" the correct answer to this question?* If we try both possible answers -- "yes" and "no" -- we find neither works.
|
||||||
100. BENIS
|
100. BENIS
|
||||||
101. yes
|
101. [Floating point](float.md) had decreasing precision towards higher values, this one if already beyond the resolution of 1, so the float type cannot represent this number plus one, adding one rounds the result down to the same number.
|
||||||
|
102. yes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Other
|
## Other
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||||
# Free Speech
|
# Free Speech
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Freedom of speech means there are no arbitrary government or anyone else imposed punishments for or obstacles (such as [censorship](censorship.md)) to merely talking about anything, making any public statement or publication of any information. **Free speech has to be by definition absolute and have no limit**, otherwise it's not free speech but controlled, limited speech -- trying to add exceptions to free speech is like trying to limit to whom a [free software](free_software.md) license is granted; doing so immediately makes such software non-free; free speech "with limits" is like free lunch for a low price or vegetarian food with only a little meat in it -- it's not the real thing, it just wants to be called *X* without actually being *X*. **Free speech also comes with zero responsibility** exactly by definition, as responsibility implies some forms of punishment; free speech means exactly one can say anything without fearing any burden of responsibility. Freedom of speech is an essential attribute of a mature society, sadly it hasn't been widely implemented yet and with the [SJW](sjw.md) cancer the latest trend in society is towards eliminating free speech rather than supporting it (see e.g. [political correctness](political_correctness.md)). Speech is being widely censored by extremist groups (e.g. [LGBT](lgbt.md) and [corporations](corporation.md), see also [cancel culture](cancel_culture.md)) and states -- depending on country there exist laws against so called "[hate speech](hate_speech.md)", questioning official versions of history (see e.g. [Holocaust](holocaust.md) denial laws present in many EU states), criticizing powerful people (for example it is illegal to criticize or insult that huge inbred dick Thai king), sharing of useful information such as books ([copyright](copyright.md) censorship) etc. Free speech nowadays is being eliminated by the strategy of creating an exception to free speech, usually called "hate speech", and then classifying any undesired speech under such label and silencing it.
|
Freedom of speech means there are absolutely no punishments or obstacles (such as [censorship](censorship.md)), imposed by anyone (government, [corporations](corporation.md), [culture](cutlure.md), society, technology, ...), against merely talking about anything, making any public statement and sharing or publication of any [information](information.md) at all. **Free speech has to be by definition absolute and have no limit**, otherwise it's not free speech but controlled, limited speech -- trying to add exceptions to free speech is like trying to limit to whom a [free software](free_software.md) license is granted; doing so immediately makes such software non-free; free speech "with limits" is like free lunch for a low price or vegetarian food with only a little meat in it -- it's not the real thing, it just wants to be called *X* without actually being *X*. **Free speech also comes with zero responsibility** exactly by definition, as responsibility implies some forms of punishment; free speech means exactly one can say anything without fearing any burden of responsibility. Freedom of speech is an essential attribute of a mature society, sadly it hasn't been widely implemented yet and with the [SJW](sjw.md) cancer the latest trend in society is towards eliminating free speech rather than supporting it (see e.g. [political correctness](political_correctness.md)). Speech is being widely censored by extremist groups (e.g. [LGBT](lgbt.md) and [corporations](corporation.md), see also [cancel culture](cancel_culture.md)) and states -- depending on country there exist laws against so called "[hate speech](hate_speech.md)", questioning official versions of history (see e.g. [Holocaust](holocaust.md) denial laws present in many EU states), criticizing powerful people (for example it is illegal to criticize or insult that huge inbred dick Thai king), sharing of useful information such as books ([copyright](copyright.md) censorship) etc. Free speech nowadays is being eliminated by the strategy of creating an exception to free speech, usually called "hate speech", and then classifying any undesired speech under such label and silencing it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The basic principle of free speech says that **if you don't support freedom of speech which you dislike, you don't support free speech**. I.e. speech that you hate does not equal hate speech.
|
The basic principle of free speech says that **if you don't support freedom of speech which you dislike, you don't support free speech**. I.e. speech that you hate does not equal hate speech.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -14,4 +14,5 @@ Despite what the propaganda says **there is no free speech in our society**, the
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## See Also
|
## See Also
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [nigger](nigger.md)
|
||||||
- [censorship](censorship.md)
|
- [censorship](censorship.md)
|
||||||
|
|
@ -14,12 +14,14 @@ Human language is a social construct so according to [pseudoleftists](pseudoleft
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
On one hand human languages are cool when viewed from cultural or [artistic](art.md) perspective, they allow us to write poetry, describe feelings and nature around us -- in this way they can be considered [beautiful](beauty.md). However from the perspective of others, e.g. programmers or historians, **human languages are a [nightmare](nightmare.md)**. There is unfortunately an **enormous, inherent curse connected to any human language**, both natural or constructed, that comes from its inevitably [fuzzy](fuzzy.md) nature stemming from fuzziness or real life concepts, it's the problem of **defining [semantics](semantics.md)** of words and constructs (no, Lojban doesn't solve this). [Syntax](syntax.md) (i.e. the rules that say which sentences are valid and which are not) doesn't pose such a problem, we can quite easily define what's grammatically correct or not (it's not as hard to write a program that checks gramatical correctness), it is semantics (i.e. meanings) that is extremely hard to grasp -- even in rigorous languages (such as mathematical notation or programming languages) semantics is a bit harder to define (quite often still relying on bits of human language), but while in a programming language we are essentially able to define quite EXACTLY what each construct means (e.g. `a + b` returns the sum of values *a* and *b*), in a natural language we are basically never able to do that, we can only ever form fuzzy connections between other fuzzy concepts and we can never have anything fixed.
|
On one hand human languages are cool when viewed from cultural or [artistic](art.md) perspective, they allow us to write poetry, describe feelings and nature around us -- in this way they can be considered [beautiful](beauty.md). However from the perspective of others, e.g. programmers or historians, **human languages are a [nightmare](nightmare.md)**. There is unfortunately an **enormous, inherent curse connected to any human language**, both natural or constructed, that comes from its inevitably [fuzzy](fuzzy.md) nature stemming from fuzziness or real life concepts, it's the problem of **defining [semantics](semantics.md)** of words and constructs (no, Lojban doesn't solve this). [Syntax](syntax.md) (i.e. the rules that say which sentences are valid and which are not) doesn't pose such a problem, we can quite easily define what's grammatically correct or not (it's not as hard to write a program that checks gramatical correctness), it is semantics (i.e. meanings) that is extremely hard to grasp -- even in rigorous languages (such as mathematical notation or programming languages) semantics is a bit harder to define (quite often still relying on bits of human language), but while in a programming language we are essentially able to define quite EXACTLY what each construct means (e.g. `a + b` returns the sum of values *a* and *b*), in a natural language we are basically never able to do that, we can only ever form fuzzy connections between other fuzzy concepts and we can never have anything fixed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Due to this fuzziness human languages inevitably change over time no matter how hard we try to counter this, any text written a few thousand years ago is nowadays very hard to understand -- not because the old languages aren't spoken anymore, but because the original meanings of specific words, phrases and constructs are distroted by time; when learning an old language we learn what each word meant by reading its translation to some modern word, but the modern word is always more or less different. Even if it's a very simple word such as "fish", our modern word for fish means a slightly different thing than let's say ancient Roman's word for fish because it had slightly different connotations such as potential references to other things: fish for example used to be the symbol of Christianity, nowadays people don't even commonly make this connection. Fishermen were a despised class of workers, to some fish may have signified food and abundance, to others something that "smells bad", to others something or someone who's "slippery". Some words may have referred to some contemporary "[meme](meme.md)" that's been long forgotten and if some text makes the reference, we won't understand it. The word "book" for example meant something a bit different 2000 years ago than it means now: back then a book might have been just a relatively short scroll, it was expensive and people didn't read books the same way as we do today, they commonly just read them out loud to others, so "reading a book" and the word "book" itself doesn't conjure the same picture in our heads as it did back then. Or another example showing the difference between languages existing at the same time is this: while the Spanish word "perro" translates to English as "dog", the meanings aren't the same; some English speakers use the word as a synonym for "friend" but in Spanish the word can be used as an insult so shouting "perro" and "dog" in the street may lead to different (possibly completely opposite) images popping up in the heads of those who hear it. How do you describe a word precisely if you can only describe it with other imprecise words that are changing constantly? No, not even pictures will help -- if you attach the picture of a cat to the word "cat", it's still not clear what it means -- does it stand for the picture of the cat or for the cat that's in the picture, does it stand ONLY for the one cat that's in the picture or all other animals that are similar to the one in the picture? How similar? Is lion a cat? Is a toy cat or cartoon cat a cat? Or does the picture signify that anything with a fur is a cat? If it looks like cat but walks on two legs and speaks, is it still a cat? Now imagine describing a more abstract term such as *thought*, *number* or *existence*. There is no solid ground, even such essential words as "to want" or "to be" have different meanings between languages ("to be" can stand for "to exist", "to be in a place", "to temporarily have some property", "to permanently have some property" etc.). Even dictionaries admit defeat and are happy with having circular definitions because there aren't any foundations to build upon, circular definitions are inevitable, dictionaries just help you connect fuzzy concepts together. All of this extends to tenses, moods, cases and everything else. This can be very well seen e.g. with people interpreting old texts such as the Bible, for example some say [Jesus](jesus.md) claimed to be the son of God while others reject it, saying that even if he stated the sentence, it actually wasn't meant literally as it was a commonly used phrase that meant something else -- these people will argue about everything and they can comfortably interpret the same text in completely opposite ways. The point is that we just can't know.
|
Due to this fuzziness human languages inevitably change over time no matter how hard we try to counter this, any text written a few thousand years ago is nowadays very hard to understand -- not because the old languages aren't spoken anymore, but because the original meanings of specific words, phrases and constructs are distorted by time; when learning an old language we learn what each word meant by reading its translation to some modern word, but the modern word is always more or less different. Even if it's a very simple word such as "fish", our modern word for fish means a slightly different thing than let's say ancient Roman's word for fish because it had slightly different connotations such as potential references to other things: fish for example used to be the symbol of Christianity, nowadays people don't even commonly make this connection. Fishermen were a despised class of workers, to some fish may have signified food and abundance, to others something that "smells bad", to others something or someone who's "slippery". Some words may have referred to some contemporary "[meme](meme.md)" that's been long forgotten and if some text makes the reference, we won't understand it. The word "book" for example meant something a bit different 2000 years ago than it means now: back then a book might have been just a relatively short scroll, it was expensive and people didn't read books the same way as we do today, they commonly just read them out loud to others, so "reading a book" and the word "book" itself doesn't conjure the same picture in our heads as it did back then. Or another example showing the difference between languages existing at the same time is this: while the Spanish word "perro" translates to English as "dog", the meanings aren't the same; some English speakers use the word as a synonym for "friend" but in Spanish the word can be used as an insult so shouting "perro" and "dog" in the street may lead to different (possibly completely opposite) images popping up in the heads of those who hear it. How do you describe a word precisely if you can only describe it with other imprecise words that are changing constantly? No, not even pictures will help -- if you attach the picture of a cat to the word "cat", it's still not clear what it means -- does it stand for the picture of the cat or for the cat that's in the picture, does it stand ONLY for the one cat that's in the picture or all other animals that are similar to the one in the picture? How similar? Is lion a cat? Is a toy cat or cartoon cat a cat? Or does the picture signify that anything with a fur is a cat? If it looks like cat but walks on two legs and speaks, is it still a cat? Now imagine describing a more abstract term such as *thought*, *number* or *existence*. There is no solid ground, even such essential words as "to want" or "to be" have different meanings between languages ("to be" can stand for "to exist", "to be in a place", "to temporarily have some property", "to permanently have some property" etc.). Even dictionaries admit defeat and are happy with having circular definitions because there aren't any foundations to build upon, circular definitions are inevitable, dictionaries just help you connect fuzzy concepts together. All of this extends to tenses, moods, cases and everything else. This can be very well seen e.g. with people interpreting old texts such as the Bible, for example some say [Jesus](jesus.md) claimed to be the son of God while others reject it, saying that even if he stated the sentence, it actually wasn't meant literally as it was a commonly used phrase that meant something else -- these people will argue about everything and they can comfortably interpret the same text in completely opposite ways. The point is that we just can't know.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{ Just one more of other countless examples I recently encountered: it used to be generally believed that [Jesus](jesus.md) was crucified so that he was nailed on the cross through his palms, however it was shown this wouldn't work and also other evidence showed people were nailed more in the arms, in a way that would hold the weight of the body but wouldn't hit the artery. The confusion came from translation -- the Greek word for "hand" also includes part of an arm, i.e. the word for hand in Greek is different from the word hand in some other languages. ~drummyfish }
|
{ Just one more of other countless examples I recently encountered: it used to be generally believed that [Jesus](jesus.md) was crucified so that he was nailed on the cross through his palms, however it was shown this wouldn't work and also other evidence showed people were nailed more in the arms, in a way that would hold the weight of the body but wouldn't hit the artery. The confusion came from translation -- the Greek word for "hand" also includes part of an arm, i.e. the word for hand in Greek is different from the word hand in some other languages. ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In addition there are ALWAYS great many hidden implicit assumptions that both communicating sides have to share to be able to communicate (and these can only be assured by many years of learning, spent in the same environment) -- for example if I tell someone "Drive to the city and buy food.", in fact I mean something like "Right now walk with your feet to our car, open the door, sit in, take the wheel in your hands, start the car, drive only on the road with your eyes open, ..."; the guy can technically satisfy my order by waiting 10 years, then driving a truck through forests with eyes closed over the whole globe and back. Just as it's impossible to perfectly define all words, it is impossible to explicitly recount all assumptions. Though the mentioned example is exaggerated, it shows an ever present phenomenon we have to deal with, a phenomenon which can cause misunderstanding or be easily abused.
|
In addition there are ALWAYS great many hidden implicit assumptions that both communicating sides have to share to be able to communicate (and these can only be assured by many years of learning, spent in the same environment) -- for example if I tell someone "Drive to the city and buy food.", in fact I mean something like "Right now walk with your feet to our car, open the door, sit in, take the wheel in your hands, start the car, drive only on the road with your eyes open, ..."; the guy can technically satisfy my order by waiting 10 years, then driving a truck through forests with eyes closed over the whole globe and back. Just as it's impossible to perfectly define all words, it is impossible to explicitly recount all assumptions. Though the mentioned example is exaggerated, it shows an ever present phenomenon we have to deal with, a phenomenon which can cause misunderstanding or be easily abused.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Of course this barrier exists between contemporary languages too, the idiom "lost in translation" exists for a reason -- translating something always loses or at least changes something. Translating one sentence over and over to different languages and back to the original one will most likely produce a sentence with very distinct meaning.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This is the grand issue that common people almost universally overlook, most will naively think that with careful effort it is possible to express oneself so clearly that others simply won't be able to misunderstand -- this is sadly false, even with most carefully crafted sentences language always extremely easily allows any word to be twisted by politicians to anything they want, it destroys old knowledge and prevents us from communicating with clarity and recording ideas so that they would last into the future. This damnation of language plagues every book, authors constantly complain "I should have rather used this and that word" but that wouldn't even help, it's impossible to say something so as to not be misunderstood because human language is a weak, crippled tool just based on shouting weird sounds in hopes someone will get a vague idea of what's going on in your head. Due to this limitation of language it is absolutely worthless to discuss anything if after 5 minutes you don't come to agreement, the discussion will lead nowhere, it's best to just leave it at communication being impossible because even if linguistically you speak the same language, you cannot communicate correct meanings, even words like "is", "when", "bad" or "will" will have absolutely different meanings, you would have to define every word of every sentence and then every word of every new sentence you produce for 1000 years until you come to circular definitions when you'll still be disagreeing but won't even be able to waste time further.
|
This is the grand issue that common people almost universally overlook, most will naively think that with careful effort it is possible to express oneself so clearly that others simply won't be able to misunderstand -- this is sadly false, even with most carefully crafted sentences language always extremely easily allows any word to be twisted by politicians to anything they want, it destroys old knowledge and prevents us from communicating with clarity and recording ideas so that they would last into the future. This damnation of language plagues every book, authors constantly complain "I should have rather used this and that word" but that wouldn't even help, it's impossible to say something so as to not be misunderstood because human language is a weak, crippled tool just based on shouting weird sounds in hopes someone will get a vague idea of what's going on in your head. Due to this limitation of language it is absolutely worthless to discuss anything if after 5 minutes you don't come to agreement, the discussion will lead nowhere, it's best to just leave it at communication being impossible because even if linguistically you speak the same language, you cannot communicate correct meanings, even words like "is", "when", "bad" or "will" will have absolutely different meanings, you would have to define every word of every sentence and then every word of every new sentence you produce for 1000 years until you come to circular definitions when you'll still be disagreeing but won't even be able to waste time further.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This issue is very hard to solve, maybe impossible. It seems that due to the extreme complexity of [real life](irl.md) our language can't operate with precise equations but rather has to settle with concepts that are just fuzzy blobs that our brains -- [neural networks](neural_net.md) in our heads -- learn by trial and error over many years. We learn that if we hear the word *X*, it's best to react by feeling fear or turning our head or closing our eyes etc.
|
This issue is very hard to solve, maybe impossible. It seems that due to the extreme complexity of [real life](irl.md) our language can't operate with precise equations but rather has to settle with concepts that are just fuzzy blobs that our brains -- [neural networks](neural_net.md) in our heads -- learn by trial and error over many years. We learn that if we hear the word *X*, it's best to react by feeling fear or turning our head or closing our eyes etc.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ What following a "constantly [work in progress](wip.md)" list of subjectively se
|
||||||
- **Hybrids**: No, we don't actually know if humans and apes can interbreed or not, humanzees have been reported, as well as hybrids of humans and other animals, there exist some real weird photos. Ligers and tigons are also cool, but there are many other interesting possibilities. See http://www.macroevolution.net.
|
- **Hybrids**: No, we don't actually know if humans and apes can interbreed or not, humanzees have been reported, as well as hybrids of humans and other animals, there exist some real weird photos. Ligers and tigons are also cool, but there are many other interesting possibilities. See http://www.macroevolution.net.
|
||||||
- **Third man factor**: there is a phenomenon which makes people hear some kind of comforting, guiding voice in long-lasting crisis situations, described e.g. by people who got lost in mountains etc.
|
- **Third man factor**: there is a phenomenon which makes people hear some kind of comforting, guiding voice in long-lasting crisis situations, described e.g. by people who got lost in mountains etc.
|
||||||
- **Weird coincidences**: for example the names of all continents start and end with *A* (AsiA, AfricA, AmericA, AntracticA, AustraliA) except for Europe which starts and ends with *E*. Sun and Moon have the same apparent size in the sky. And so on.
|
- **Weird coincidences**: for example the names of all continents start and end with *A* (AsiA, AfricA, AmericA, AntracticA, AustraliA) except for Europe which starts and ends with *E*. Sun and Moon have the same apparent size in the sky. And so on.
|
||||||
|
- **[Language](human_language.md) and translations**: translation errors are a rich rabbit hole, revealing not only bloopers but weird differences and features of languages themselves. { Start for example here https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Lost_in_Translation. ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
- ...
|
- ...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -26,6 +26,8 @@ http://favoritesite4.org/coolimage.jpg
|
||||||
" | shuf | wget -i - -E -e robots=off -nc -nd -U "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)" --tries=3 -k -w 1 -P offline
|
" | shuf | wget -i - -E -e robots=off -nc -nd -U "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; SV1)" --tries=3 -k -w 1 -P offline
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
As of 2024 the Internet is dead, like whole society, killed by [capitalism](capitalism.md) -- take a look at the alternatives to the Internet down below.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## History
|
## History
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*See also [history](history.md) and [www](www.md).*
|
*See also [history](history.md) and [www](www.md).*
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
4
lgbt.md
4
lgbt.md
|
|
@ -20,4 +20,6 @@ LGBT oppose [straight](straight.md) people as they solely focus on gaining more
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In the world of technology they are known for supporting [toxic](toxic.md) [codes of conduct](coc.md) in [FOSS](foss.md) projects (so called [tranny software](tranny_sw.md)), they managed to push them into most mainstream projects, even [Linux](linux.md) etc. Generally they just killed [free speech](free_speech.md) online as well as [in real life](irl.md), every platform now has some kind of surveillance and censorship justified by "preventing offensive speech". They cancelled [Richard Stallman](rms.md) for merely questioning a part of their gospel. They also managed to establish things like "diversity" quotas in Hollywood that only allow Oscars to be given to movies made by specific number of gays, lesbians etc., and they started to insert gay characters into fairy tales and movies for children (Toy Story etc.) xD This is literally the same kind of cheap but effective propaganda Nazi Germany employed on children; it's just that now after nationalism has been demonized after the world war we replaced nationalism with gender identity, an exactly same thing in principle just with a different name. Apparently in the software development industry it is now standard to pretend to be a tranny on one's resume so as to greatly increase the chance of being hired for diversity quotas xD WTF if I didn't live in this shitty world I wouldn't believe that's even possible, in a dystopian horror movie this would feel like crossing the line of believability too far [lmao](lmao.md).
|
In the world of technology they are known for supporting [toxic](toxic.md) [codes of conduct](coc.md) in [FOSS](foss.md) projects (so called [tranny software](tranny_sw.md)), they managed to push them into most mainstream projects, even [Linux](linux.md) etc. Generally they just killed [free speech](free_speech.md) online as well as [in real life](irl.md), every platform now has some kind of surveillance and censorship justified by "preventing offensive speech". They cancelled [Richard Stallman](rms.md) for merely questioning a part of their gospel. They also managed to establish things like "diversity" quotas in Hollywood that only allow Oscars to be given to movies made by specific number of gays, lesbians etc., and they started to insert gay characters into fairy tales and movies for children (Toy Story etc.) xD This is literally the same kind of cheap but effective propaganda Nazi Germany employed on children; it's just that now after nationalism has been demonized after the world war we replaced nationalism with gender identity, an exactly same thing in principle just with a different name. Apparently in the software development industry it is now standard to pretend to be a tranny on one's resume so as to greatly increase the chance of being hired for diversity quotas xD WTF if I didn't live in this shitty world I wouldn't believe that's even possible, in a dystopian horror movie this would feel like crossing the line of believability too far [lmao](lmao.md).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
In the non-technological world they are known for example, besides others, for destroying all [art](art.md) by giving everything a twisted sexual context, for example there's now a retroactively injected LGBT propaganda in child stories like [Harry Potter](harry_potter.md): children reading about the old, wise Dumbledore now also have to read the asterisks about how they/thems is in fact a hexadecimal non fluid that had oral sex with Severus Snape, which is of course not relevant to the story at all, it's there to just compensate for the fact that he's a white male, so he can't at all be straight because he's supposed to represent good (straight white males can only represent evil [nowadays](21st_century.md)).
|
In the non-technological world they are known for example, besides others, for destroying all [art](art.md) by giving everything a twisted sexual context, for example there's now a retroactively injected LGBT propaganda in child stories like [Harry Potter](harry_potter.md): children reading about the old, wise Dumbledore now also have to read the asterisks about how they/thems is in fact a hexadecimal non fluid that had oral sex with Severus Snape, which is of course not relevant to the story at all, it's there to just compensate for the fact that he's a white male, so he can't at all be straight because he's supposed to represent good (straight white males can only represent evil [nowadays](21st_century.md)).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
From the point of view of the evolutionary system of [capitalism](capitalism.md) LGBT is a very successful organism that adopted to live in symbiosis with [corporations](corporation.md): it is an entity spawning attention and grounds for business on which corporations can feast for which it is in return supported and fed by corporations, with the power of their [marketing](marketing.md) and propaganda, that's why you see every corporation go woke -- corporations even let them be entered by LGBT, they implement [codes of censorship](coc.md), they discriminate against LGBT opposition etc., they protect their milking cows. These organisms have common goals such as increasing the means of [censorship](censorship.md) and thought control on which they conspire and collaborate -- an LGBT tranny calling for censorship will be backed by corporations on Twitter, in turn a corporation setting up censorship technology justified by protecting LGBT will be backed by LGBT influencers and so on.
|
||||||
4
life.md
4
life.md
|
|
@ -4,4 +4,6 @@ TODO
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
It is [currently](21st_century.md) better to be dead than alive. [LRS](lrs.md) is trying to change this but it will fail.
|
It is [currently](21st_century.md) better to be dead than alive. [LRS](lrs.md) is trying to change this but it will fail.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{ My current experience as a living being is that life is worse than death -- life in itself could be good but the environment doesn't allow this, it would be very good to have life in an environment that allowed for happiness of life, I would call that a paradise. Now I already also know it's impossible to make such environment but the only good thing to do is still strive for it, even knowing one will fail, doing anything else is just worse. So I will try to achieve this, then I will fail and die and I will be in peace. ~drummyfish }
|
{ My current experience as a living being is that life is worse than death -- life in itself could be good but the environment doesn't allow this, it would be very good to have life in an environment that allowed for happiness of life, I would call that a paradise. Now I already also know it's impossible to make such environment but the only good thing to do is still strive for it, even knowing one will fail, doing anything else is just worse. So I will try to achieve this, then I will fail and die and I will be in peace. ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Life is a constant change for the worse.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ WORK IN PROGRESS
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
| mainstream | correct/cooler |
|
| mainstream | correct/cooler |
|
||||||
| ------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------- |
|
| ------------------------------------------ | ---------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||||
| American | Amerifag, Yankee |
|
| American | Americunt, Amerifag, Yankee |
|
||||||
| [anime](anime.md) | tranime |
|
| [anime](anime.md) | tranime |
|
||||||
| [Apple](apple.md) user | iToddler |
|
| [Apple](apple.md) user | iToddler |
|
||||||
| [Asperger](autism.md) | assburger |
|
| [Asperger](autism.md) | assburger |
|
||||||
|
|
@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ WORK IN PROGRESS
|
||||||
| "person" | man |
|
| "person" | man |
|
||||||
| [playstation](playstation.md) | gaystation |
|
| [playstation](playstation.md) | gaystation |
|
||||||
| plug and play | plug and pray |
|
| plug and play | plug and pray |
|
||||||
|
| proprietary service | disservice |
|
||||||
| school | indoctrination center |
|
| school | indoctrination center |
|
||||||
| "science" | [soyence](soyence.md) |
|
| "science" | [soyence](soyence.md) |
|
||||||
| software as a service ([SAAS](saas.md)) | service as a software substitute (SAASS) |
|
| software as a service ([SAAS](saas.md)) | service as a software substitute (SAASS) |
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
2
main.md
2
main.md
|
|
@ -124,4 +124,4 @@ Here there are quick directions to some of the important topics; for more see th
|
||||||
Feel free to ignore this. Here we'll put links to help them being promoted, to help small search engines connect the non-mainstream web and so on. Please note that we don't necessarily agree with or promote what's on these sites, we just feel it's good if they get a bump for whatever reason (e.g. being censored by mainstream, containing some useful stuff, having good web design, provoking thought, demonstrating something good, demonstrating something bad and so on). If you feel brave you can try randomly clicking something, we put quite interesting sites here. The links follow. { Let me know if you want to suggest addition or removal of some link. If some site turns 404, woke, capitalist or employs adds, I'll probably take it down. ~drummyfish }
|
Feel free to ignore this. Here we'll put links to help them being promoted, to help small search engines connect the non-mainstream web and so on. Please note that we don't necessarily agree with or promote what's on these sites, we just feel it's good if they get a bump for whatever reason (e.g. being censored by mainstream, containing some useful stuff, having good web design, provoking thought, demonstrating something good, demonstrating something bad and so on). If you feel brave you can try randomly clicking something, we put quite interesting sites here. The links follow. { Let me know if you want to suggest addition or removal of some link. If some site turns 404, woke, capitalist or employs adds, I'll probably take it down. ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[http://collapseos.org](http://collapseos.org), [https://suckless.org](https://suckless.org), [http://duskos.org](http://duskos.org), [https://wiki.osdev.org](https://wiki.osdev.org), [http://lolwut.info](http://lolwut.info), [http://cat-v.org](http://cat-v.org), [https://opengameart.org](https://opengameart.org), [https://www.gutenberg.org](https://www.gutenberg.org), [https://librivox.org](https://librivox.org), [https://libregamewiki.org](https://libregamewiki.org), [https://pantsuprophet.xyz](https://pantsuprophet.xyz), [https://duion.com](https://duion.com), [http://digdeeper.club](http://digdeeper.club), [https://www.chimpout.com](https://www.chimpout.com), [http://floodgap.com](http://floodgap.com), [https://en.metapedia.org](https://en.metapedia.org), [https://www.vidlii.com](https://www.vidlii.com), [https://wikiindex.org](https://wikiindex.org), [https://saidit.net](https://saidit.net), [https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org](https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org), [http://progopedia.com](http://progopedia.com), [http://techrights.org](http://techrights.org), [https://landsofgames.com](https://landsofgames.com), [http://www.macroevolution.net](http://www.macroevolution.net), [https://hub.darcs.net](https://hub.darcs.net), [https://repo.or.cz](https://repo.or.cz), [https://templeos.org](https://templeos.org), [http://cidoku.net](http://cidoku.net), [https://www.gnu.org](https://www.gnu.org), [https://kiwifarms.st](https://kiwifarms.st/), [https://circumlunar.space](https://circumlunar.space), [http://www.nigger.org](http://www.nigger.org), [https://forums.somethingawful.com](https://forums.somethingawful.com), [https://notabug.org](https://notabug.org), [https://gopherproxy.meulie.net](https://gopherproxy.meulie.net), [http://www.reactionary.software](http://www.reactionary.software), [https://libre.video](https://libre.video), [http://textfiles.com](http://textfiles.com), [https://esolangs.org](https://esolangs.org), [http://www.ioccc.org](http://www.ioccc.org), [https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com](https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com), [http://www.calresco.org](http://www.calresco.org), [https://encyclopediadramatica.top](https://encyclopediadramatica.top), [https://infogalactic.com](https://infogalactic.com), [https://www.icechewing.com](https://www.icechewing.com),
|
[http://collapseos.org](http://collapseos.org), [https://suckless.org](https://suckless.org), [http://duskos.org](http://duskos.org), [https://wiki.osdev.org](https://wiki.osdev.org), [http://lolwut.info](http://lolwut.info), [http://cat-v.org](http://cat-v.org), [https://opengameart.org](https://opengameart.org), [https://www.gutenberg.org](https://www.gutenberg.org), [https://librivox.org](https://librivox.org), [https://libregamewiki.org](https://libregamewiki.org), [https://pantsuprophet.xyz](https://pantsuprophet.xyz), [https://duion.com](https://duion.com), [http://digdeeper.club](http://digdeeper.club), [https://www.chimpout.com](https://www.chimpout.com), [http://floodgap.com](http://floodgap.com), [https://en.metapedia.org](https://en.metapedia.org), [https://www.vidlii.com](https://www.vidlii.com), [https://wikiindex.org](https://wikiindex.org), [https://saidit.net](https://saidit.net), [https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org](https://www.newworldencyclopedia.org), [http://progopedia.com](http://progopedia.com), [http://techrights.org](http://techrights.org), [https://landsofgames.com](https://landsofgames.com), [http://www.macroevolution.net](http://www.macroevolution.net), [https://hub.darcs.net](https://hub.darcs.net), [https://repo.or.cz](https://repo.or.cz), [https://templeos.org](https://templeos.org), [http://cidoku.net](http://cidoku.net), [https://www.gnu.org](https://www.gnu.org), [https://kiwifarms.st](https://kiwifarms.st/), [https://circumlunar.space](https://circumlunar.space), [http://www.nigger.org](http://www.nigger.org), [https://forums.somethingawful.com](https://forums.somethingawful.com), [https://notabug.org](https://notabug.org), [https://gopherproxy.meulie.net](https://gopherproxy.meulie.net), [http://www.reactionary.software](http://www.reactionary.software), [https://libre.video](https://libre.video), [http://textfiles.com](http://textfiles.com), [https://esolangs.org](https://esolangs.org), [http://www.ioccc.org](http://www.ioccc.org), [https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com](https://solar.lowtechmagazine.com), [http://www.calresco.org](http://www.calresco.org), [https://encyclopediadramatica.top](https://encyclopediadramatica.top), [https://infogalactic.com](https://infogalactic.com), [https://www.icechewing.com](https://www.icechewing.com),
|
||||||
[http://www.nigrapedia.com](http://www.nigrapedia.com), [https://www.rouming.cz](https://www.rouming.cz), [https://www.thevenusproject.com](https://www.thevenusproject.com), [https://doxbin.org](https://doxbin.org), [https://frogesay.neocities.org](https://frogesay.neocities.org), [https://www.debunkingskeptics.com](https://www.debunkingskeptics.com), [https://stallman.org](https://stallman.org), [https://8kun.top](https://8kun.top), [https://annas-archive.org](https://annas-archive.org), [http://icculus.org/piga](http://icculus.org/piga), [https://forum.freegamedev.net](https://forum.freegamedev.net), [https://fediverse.wiki](https://fediverse.wiki), [https://dolphinana.codeberg.page](https://dolphinana.codeberg.page), [http://www.niggermania.com](http://www.niggermania.com), [https://www.711chan.net](https://www.711chan.net), [https://watchpeopledie.tv](https://watchpeopledie.tv), [https://flarerpg.org](https://flarerpg.org), [https://copyfree.org](https://copyfree.org), [https://wiki.bibanon.org](https://wiki.bibanon.org), [https://www.chessprogramming.org](https://www.chessprogramming.org), [https://zerocontradictions.net/FAQs/race-FAQs](https://zerocontradictions.net/FAQs/race-FAQs), [http://bitreich.org](http://bitreich.org), [http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com](http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com), [https://incels.wiki](https://incels.wiki), [https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net](https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net), [https://softpanorama.org](https://softpanorama.org), [http://humanknowledge.net](http://humanknowledge.net), [https://wiki.leftypol.org](https://wiki.leftypol.org), [https://mdfs.net](https://mdfs.net), [https://bienvenidoainternet.org](https://bienvenidoainternet.org), [https://leftychan.net](https://leftychan.net), [https://leftypol.org](https://leftypol.org), [https://postbox.garden](https://postbox.garden), [https://www.lord-enki.net](https://www.lord-enki.net), [https://sanctioned-suicide.net](https://sanctioned-suicide.net), [http://www.tastyfish.cz](http://www.tastyfish.cz), [https://simplifier.neocities.org](https://simplifier.neocities.org), [http://datamath.org](http://datamath.org), [https://www.lixgame.com](https://www.lixgame.com), [https://obsoletemedia.org](https://obsoletemedia.org), [http://www.doshaven.eu](http://www.doshaven.eu), [https://omick.net](https://omick.net), [http://countercomplex.blogspot.com](http://countercomplex.blogspot.com), [https://wiki.thingsandstuff.org](https://wiki.thingsandstuff.org), [https://tinfoil-hat.net](https://tinfoil-hat.net), [https://search.marginalia.nu](https://search.marginalia.nu), [http://wiby.me](http://wiby.me), [https://57296.neocities.org](https://57296.neocities.org), [https://coom.tech](https://coom.tech), [https://rightdao.com](https://rightdao.com), [https://www.alexandria.org](https://www.alexandria.org), [https://allthetropes.org](https://allthetropes.org), [http://dunfield.classiccmp.org](http://dunfield.classiccmp.org/), [https://nanochess.org](https://nanochess.org), [http://afternoon.dynu.com](http://afternoon.dynu.com/), [https://searchlores.nickifaulk.com](https://searchlores.nickifaulk.com), [https://senseis.xmp.net](https://senseis.xmp.net/), [https://stardust.cx](https://stardust.cx), [https://planetmath.org](https://planetmath.org), [https://texteditors.org](https://texteditors.org), [https://www.trade-free.org](https://www.trade-free.org), [https://www.spi-inc.org](https://www.spi-inc.org), [http://runtimeterror.com](http://runtimeterror.com), [https://wiki.archiveteam.org](https://wiki.archiveteam.org), [https://piracy.vercel.app](https://piracy.vercel.app), [https://wiki.tuhs.org](https://wiki.tuhs.org), [http://cyber.dabamos.de](http://cyber.dabamos.de), [https://eldritchdata.neocities.org](https://eldritchdata.neocities.org), [https://bellard.org](https://bellard.org), [https://gcide.gnu.org.ua](https://gcide.gnu.org.ua), [https://2bit.neocities.org](https://2bit.neocities.org), [https://1chan.net](https://1chan.net), [http://mathlair.allfunandgames.ca](http://mathlair.allfunandgames.ca), [http://cumallover.me](http://cumallover.me), [http://www.trashrobot.org](http://www.trashrobot.org), [http://horsefucker.org](http://horsefucker.org), [https://colfax.site/books/trashrobot](https://colfax.site/books/trashrobot), [https://archive.org/details/@autism_personified127](https://archive.org/details/@autism_personified127), [https://ludicrital.neocities.org](https://ludicrital.neocities.org), [https://jacobsm.com](https://jacobsm.com), [http://ronja.twibright.com](http://ronja.twibright.com), [https://conspiracies.win](https://conspiracies.win), [http://www.twibright.com/hw.php](http://www.twibright.com/hw.php), [http://im.snibgo.com](http://im.snibgo.com), [http://www.choosesimplicity.com](http://www.choosesimplicity.com)
|
[http://www.nigrapedia.com](http://www.nigrapedia.com), [https://www.rouming.cz](https://www.rouming.cz), [https://www.thevenusproject.com](https://www.thevenusproject.com), [https://doxbin.org](https://doxbin.org), [https://frogesay.neocities.org](https://frogesay.neocities.org), [https://www.debunkingskeptics.com](https://www.debunkingskeptics.com), [https://stallman.org](https://stallman.org), [https://8kun.top](https://8kun.top), [https://annas-archive.org](https://annas-archive.org), [http://icculus.org/piga](http://icculus.org/piga), [https://forum.freegamedev.net](https://forum.freegamedev.net), [https://fediverse.wiki](https://fediverse.wiki), [https://dolphinana.codeberg.page](https://dolphinana.codeberg.page), [http://www.niggermania.com](http://www.niggermania.com), [https://www.711chan.net](https://www.711chan.net), [https://watchpeopledie.tv](https://watchpeopledie.tv), [https://flarerpg.org](https://flarerpg.org), [https://copyfree.org](https://copyfree.org), [https://wiki.bibanon.org](https://wiki.bibanon.org), [https://www.chessprogramming.org](https://www.chessprogramming.org), [https://zerocontradictions.net/FAQs/race-FAQs](https://zerocontradictions.net/FAQs/race-FAQs), [http://bitreich.org](http://bitreich.org), [http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com](http://www.humanbiologicaldiversity.com), [https://incels.wiki](https://incels.wiki), [https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net](https://www.nearlyfreespeech.net), [https://softpanorama.org](https://softpanorama.org), [http://humanknowledge.net](http://humanknowledge.net), [https://wiki.leftypol.org](https://wiki.leftypol.org), [https://mdfs.net](https://mdfs.net), [https://bienvenidoainternet.org](https://bienvenidoainternet.org), [https://leftychan.net](https://leftychan.net), [https://leftypol.org](https://leftypol.org), [https://postbox.garden](https://postbox.garden), [https://www.lord-enki.net](https://www.lord-enki.net), [https://sanctioned-suicide.net](https://sanctioned-suicide.net), [http://www.tastyfish.cz](http://www.tastyfish.cz), [https://simplifier.neocities.org](https://simplifier.neocities.org), [http://datamath.org](http://datamath.org), [https://www.lixgame.com](https://www.lixgame.com), [https://obsoletemedia.org](https://obsoletemedia.org), [http://www.doshaven.eu](http://www.doshaven.eu), [https://omick.net](https://omick.net), [http://countercomplex.blogspot.com](http://countercomplex.blogspot.com), [https://wiki.thingsandstuff.org](https://wiki.thingsandstuff.org), [https://tinfoil-hat.net](https://tinfoil-hat.net), [https://search.marginalia.nu](https://search.marginalia.nu), [http://wiby.me](http://wiby.me), [https://57296.neocities.org](https://57296.neocities.org), [https://coom.tech](https://coom.tech), [https://rightdao.com](https://rightdao.com), [https://www.alexandria.org](https://www.alexandria.org), [https://allthetropes.org](https://allthetropes.org), [http://dunfield.classiccmp.org](http://dunfield.classiccmp.org/), [https://nanochess.org](https://nanochess.org), [http://afternoon.dynu.com](http://afternoon.dynu.com/), [https://searchlores.nickifaulk.com](https://searchlores.nickifaulk.com), [https://senseis.xmp.net](https://senseis.xmp.net/), [https://stardust.cx](https://stardust.cx), [https://planetmath.org](https://planetmath.org), [https://texteditors.org](https://texteditors.org), [https://www.trade-free.org](https://www.trade-free.org), [https://www.spi-inc.org](https://www.spi-inc.org), [http://runtimeterror.com](http://runtimeterror.com), [https://wiki.archiveteam.org](https://wiki.archiveteam.org), [https://piracy.vercel.app](https://piracy.vercel.app), [https://wiki.tuhs.org](https://wiki.tuhs.org), [http://cyber.dabamos.de](http://cyber.dabamos.de), [https://eldritchdata.neocities.org](https://eldritchdata.neocities.org), [https://bellard.org](https://bellard.org), [https://gcide.gnu.org.ua](https://gcide.gnu.org.ua), [https://2bit.neocities.org](https://2bit.neocities.org), [https://1chan.net](https://1chan.net), [http://mathlair.allfunandgames.ca](http://mathlair.allfunandgames.ca), [http://cumallover.me](http://cumallover.me), [http://www.trashrobot.org](http://www.trashrobot.org), [http://horsefucker.org](http://horsefucker.org), [https://colfax.site/books/trashrobot](https://colfax.site/books/trashrobot), [https://archive.org/details/@autism_personified127](https://archive.org/details/@autism_personified127), [https://doomwiki.org](https://doomwiki.org), [https://ludicrital.neocities.org](https://ludicrital.neocities.org), [https://jacobsm.com](https://jacobsm.com), [http://ronja.twibright.com](http://ronja.twibright.com), [https://conspiracies.win](https://conspiracies.win), [http://www.twibright.com/hw.php](http://www.twibright.com/hw.php), [http://im.snibgo.com](http://im.snibgo.com), [http://www.choosesimplicity.com](http://www.choosesimplicity.com)
|
||||||
|
|
@ -37,4 +37,5 @@ In the [gender studies](gender_studies.md) circles there is an academic debate a
|
||||||
- [troon](troon.md)
|
- [troon](troon.md)
|
||||||
- [kike](kike.md)
|
- [kike](kike.md)
|
||||||
- [pool's closed](pools_closed.md)
|
- [pool's closed](pools_closed.md)
|
||||||
- [chocolate rain](chocolate_rain.md)
|
- [chocolate rain](chocolate_rain.md)
|
||||||
|
- [kurwa](kurwa.md)
|
||||||
2
oop.md
2
oop.md
|
|
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*"I invented the term 'object oriented' and [C++](cpp.md) was not what I had in mind"* --[Alan Kay](alan_kay.md), inventor of OOP
|
*"I invented the term 'object oriented' and [C++](cpp.md) was not what I had in mind"* --[Alan Kay](alan_kay.md), inventor of OOP
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Object-oriented programming (OOP, also object-obsessed programming, objectfuscated programming, capital-oriented programming or artificial inelegance) is a [programming paradigm](paradigm.md) that tries to model reality as a collection of abstract objects that communicate with each other and obey some specific rules. While the idea itself isn't bad and can be useful in certain cases and while pure OOP in very old languages like [Smalltalk](smalltalk.md) may have even been quite elegant, by later adoption by [capitalist businesses](capitalist_software.md) the concept has been extremely twisted and degenerated to unbelievable levels -- **OOP has become extremely overused, extremely badly implemented and downright forced in programming languages** that nowadays try to apply this [abstraction](abstraction.md) to every single program and concept, creating [anti-patterns](anti_pattern.md), unnecessary issues and of course greatly significant amounts of [bloat](bloat.md). [We](lrs.md) therefore see the OOP of today as a **[cancer](cancer.md) of programming**. OOP was basically a software development fashion wave that scarred the industry for decades, it has poisoned minds of several generations. Nowadays despite OOP still keeping many fans the critical stance towards it isn't even controversial anymore, many others have voiced the criticism over and over, usually the most competent programmers like [Richard Stallman](rms.md) and [Linus Torvalds](torvalds.md) and groups like [suckless](suckless.md) and [bitreich](bitreich.md). Ugly examples of OOP gone bad include [Java](java.md) and [C++](cpp.md) (which at least doesn't force it). Other languages such as [Python](python.md) and [Javascript](javascript.md) include OOP but have lightened it up a bit and at least allow you to avoid using it. You should probably learn OOP but only to see why it's bad (and to actually understand 99% of code written nowadays).
|
Object-oriented programming (OOP, also object-obsessed programming, objectfuscated programming, capital-oriented programming or artificial inelegance) is a [programming paradigm](paradigm.md) that tries to model reality as a collection of abstract objects that communicate with each other and obey some specific rules. While the idea itself isn't bad and can be useful in certain cases and while pure OOP in very old languages like [Smalltalk](smalltalk.md) may have even been quite elegant, by later adoption by [capitalist businesses](capitalist_software.md) the concept has been extremely twisted and degenerated to unbelievable levels -- **OOP has become extremely overused, extremely badly implemented and downright forced in programming languages** that nowadays try to apply this [abstraction](abstraction.md) to every single program and concept, creating [anti-patterns](anti_pattern.md), unnecessary issues and of course greatly significant amounts of [bloat](bloat.md). [We](lrs.md) therefore see the OOP of today as a **[cancer](cancer.md) of programming**. OOP was basically a software development fashion wave that scarred the industry for decades, it has poisoned minds of several generations. Nowadays despite OOP still keeping many fans the critical stance towards it isn't even controversial anymore, many others have voiced the criticism over and over, usually the most competent programmers like [Richard Stallman](rms.md) and [Linus Torvalds](torvalds.md) and groups like [suckless](suckless.md) and [bitreich](bitreich.md). Ugly examples of OOP gone bad include [Java](java.md) and [C++](cpp.md) (which at least doesn't force it). Other languages such as [Python](python.md) and [Javascript](javascript.md) include OOP but have lightened it up a bit and at least allow you to avoid using it. You should probably learn OOP but only to see why it's bad (and to actually understand 99% of code written nowadays). Stop objectifying programs!
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**A [real life](irl.md) analogy** to give a bit of high level overview: the original [Smalltalk](smalltalk.md) style OOP was kind of like when society invented [democracy](democracy.md) -- a simple idea which everyone understands (we are 10 cavemen, let's just vote on stuff mkay?) that's many times useful and works well, e.g. on a scale of a village or a small city. Then cities grew bigger (just as software did), into states and empires and the idea kept getting more and more complicated -- people just wanted to keep the democracy, apply it to everything and scale it indefinitely, but for that they had to add more complexity, they implemented representatives, parliaments, senates, presidents, vicepresidents, ministers, judges, more and more bureaucracy, hybrid ideas (free market, controlled economy, ...), corruption and inefficiencies crept in, the system degenerated into what we have today -- a hugely expensive paperworking machine that's exploited and hacked, with laws so complicated no one really understands them, with [magic](magic.md), randomness and unpredictability, producing just waste and bullshit, crumbling under own weight. This is also the way OOP went -- they started inventing static classes/methods, abstract classes/methods, multiple inheritances, interfaces, design patterns, overriding, hybrid paradigms and so on until we ended up with ugly abominations on which today's technology stands. Now a few things have to be noted. Firstly these abominations are a disaster, they came from our mistake of taking the original simple idea (simple small scale voting democracy) and saying "let's make this the only thing in the world and let's scale it a million times!" Such idea is stupid from the start and there is no doubt about that. However another evil is that people are taught to do everything this way -- today's programmers will use the mainstream OOP everywhere, even in simple programs, they don't even think about if they should, they are simply taught "always use this". This is like in real life wanting to govern a family by having elections each year to vote for the head of the family, then having members of family vote for other members of the family to be their representatives that will talk for them (the same kind of craziness as wanting to strictly respect encapsulation even in trivial programs), then if someone wants to buy anything he has to ask for a budget several months in advance and have others vote on it while an elected anti corruption committee is watching etcetc. This kind of insanity is what's normal in software nowadays. Now the only sane discussion can be had only about the usefulness and scope of the original, simple idea (simple voting in small groups, simple pure OOP) and here we say that it may be good, but only applied to just some specific situations, i.e. we say simple OOP is good for some problems but not all, just like voting is a good solution to some problems (e.g. a group of friends deciding where to go party), but not all (e.g. passengers in a car voting on which way to steer and which pedals to press).
|
**A [real life](irl.md) analogy** to give a bit of high level overview: the original [Smalltalk](smalltalk.md) style OOP was kind of like when society invented [democracy](democracy.md) -- a simple idea which everyone understands (we are 10 cavemen, let's just vote on stuff mkay?) that's many times useful and works well, e.g. on a scale of a village or a small city. Then cities grew bigger (just as software did), into states and empires and the idea kept getting more and more complicated -- people just wanted to keep the democracy, apply it to everything and scale it indefinitely, but for that they had to add more complexity, they implemented representatives, parliaments, senates, presidents, vicepresidents, ministers, judges, more and more bureaucracy, hybrid ideas (free market, controlled economy, ...), corruption and inefficiencies crept in, the system degenerated into what we have today -- a hugely expensive paperworking machine that's exploited and hacked, with laws so complicated no one really understands them, with [magic](magic.md), randomness and unpredictability, producing just waste and bullshit, crumbling under own weight. This is also the way OOP went -- they started inventing static classes/methods, abstract classes/methods, multiple inheritances, interfaces, design patterns, overriding, hybrid paradigms and so on until we ended up with ugly abominations on which today's technology stands. Now a few things have to be noted. Firstly these abominations are a disaster, they came from our mistake of taking the original simple idea (simple small scale voting democracy) and saying "let's make this the only thing in the world and let's scale it a million times!" Such idea is stupid from the start and there is no doubt about that. However another evil is that people are taught to do everything this way -- today's programmers will use the mainstream OOP everywhere, even in simple programs, they don't even think about if they should, they are simply taught "always use this". This is like in real life wanting to govern a family by having elections each year to vote for the head of the family, then having members of family vote for other members of the family to be their representatives that will talk for them (the same kind of craziness as wanting to strictly respect encapsulation even in trivial programs), then if someone wants to buy anything he has to ask for a budget several months in advance and have others vote on it while an elected anti corruption committee is watching etcetc. This kind of insanity is what's normal in software nowadays. Now the only sane discussion can be had only about the usefulness and scope of the original, simple idea (simple voting in small groups, simple pure OOP) and here we say that it may be good, but only applied to just some specific situations, i.e. we say simple OOP is good for some problems but not all, just like voting is a good solution to some problems (e.g. a group of friends deciding where to go party), but not all (e.g. passengers in a car voting on which way to steer and which pedals to press).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -45,4 +45,5 @@ Defending pedophilia in itself is enough to be cancelled, perhaps even imprisone
|
||||||
- [loli](loli.md)
|
- [loli](loli.md)
|
||||||
- [necrophilia](necrophilia.md)
|
- [necrophilia](necrophilia.md)
|
||||||
- [zoophilia](zoophilia.md)
|
- [zoophilia](zoophilia.md)
|
||||||
- [pedobear](pedobear.md)
|
- [pedobear](pedobear.md)
|
||||||
|
- [clovergender](clovergender.md) (child stuck in adult body, attracted to other children)
|
||||||
7
phd.md
7
phd.md
|
|
@ -6,4 +6,9 @@ TODO
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Should you get a PhD?** Unless you live in the past probably not -- as said the sacrifice required is enormous, to make it you should have a REAL GOOD reason, of which there aren't many -- perhaps if you REALLY want to be teacher at University or if for some twisted reason you want to spend your whole life in the corrupt toxic [soyence](soyence.md) environment trying to prove [women](woman.md) are better than men and sucking capitalist dicks so that they throw you a bit of money so that you can buy a microscope, then maybe. The thing is that focusing on PhD sucks away a great amount of energy you could spend on actually good things, consider that instead of actually programming [less retarded software](lrs.md) you will just have to do slavery for your dissertation advisor, do bureaucracy, p-value hacking, make powerpoint presentations, [marketing](marketing.md) for your research, give handjobs to sponsors, do bullshit research you dislike (because [publish or perish](publish_or_perish.md)), all while withstanding incredible amounts of stress and dodging depression. Really [masters_degree](masters_degree.md) is [enough](good_enough.md) to give you all you need for a rich intellectual life and being able to do good things, and it won't suck the soul out of your body. On the best universities even [bachelor's](bachelors_degree.md) is probably enough. If you REALLY wanna be the smartass guy who others ought to call a doctor, in some countries you may get some kinda small doctorate, usually just for an extra exam and paying some fee (e.g. RNDr, PHDr etc., details will depend on your country so check that out). { TFW just getting the EZ dentist degree so that you may call yourself a doctor :D ~drummyfish } Nowadays you can also just buy a honorary doctorate online, it's absolutely legal business, though you probably don't wanna support this kind of capitalist bullshit, you just pay them unholy money for a piece of paper.
|
**Should you get a PhD?** Unless you live in the past probably not -- as said the sacrifice required is enormous, to make it you should have a REAL GOOD reason, of which there aren't many -- perhaps if you REALLY want to be teacher at University or if for some twisted reason you want to spend your whole life in the corrupt toxic [soyence](soyence.md) environment trying to prove [women](woman.md) are better than men and sucking capitalist dicks so that they throw you a bit of money so that you can buy a microscope, then maybe. The thing is that focusing on PhD sucks away a great amount of energy you could spend on actually good things, consider that instead of actually programming [less retarded software](lrs.md) you will just have to do slavery for your dissertation advisor, do bureaucracy, p-value hacking, make powerpoint presentations, [marketing](marketing.md) for your research, give handjobs to sponsors, do bullshit research you dislike (because [publish or perish](publish_or_perish.md)), all while withstanding incredible amounts of stress and dodging depression. Really [masters_degree](masters_degree.md) is [enough](good_enough.md) to give you all you need for a rich intellectual life and being able to do good things, and it won't suck the soul out of your body. On the best universities even [bachelor's](bachelors_degree.md) is probably enough. If you REALLY wanna be the smartass guy who others ought to call a doctor, in some countries you may get some kinda small doctorate, usually just for an extra exam and paying some fee (e.g. RNDr, PHDr etc., details will depend on your country so check that out). { TFW just getting the EZ dentist degree so that you may call yourself a doctor :D ~drummyfish } Nowadays you can also just buy a honorary doctorate online, it's absolutely legal business, though you probably don't wanna support this kind of capitalist bullshit, you just pay them unholy money for a piece of paper.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
TODO
|
TODO
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## See Also
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- [academia](academia.md) (spoiler: it's dead)
|
||||||
|
- [CEO](ceo.md)
|
||||||
3438
random_page.md
3438
random_page.md
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load diff
|
|
@ -10,4 +10,56 @@ Another example is e.g. the association "theft = bad". Indeed it has some sense
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
When confronted with a new view, political theory etc., we should try to turn shortcut thinking off; we should also do this every time someone tries to have us make a decision under a competitive system such as [capitalism](capitalism.md) as that someone is most likely trying to manipulate us. Doing this can be called **being open minded**, i.e. opening one's mind to reinterpretation of very basic, possibly strongly rooted concepts by a new view, however be careful as the meaning of the term "open mind" is often twisted too. Also we should probably update our association from time to time just to keep them up with the new state of the world, only by sitting down and thinking about the world and discussing it with the right people.
|
When confronted with a new view, political theory etc., we should try to turn shortcut thinking off; we should also do this every time someone tries to have us make a decision under a competitive system such as [capitalism](capitalism.md) as that someone is most likely trying to manipulate us. Doing this can be called **being open minded**, i.e. opening one's mind to reinterpretation of very basic, possibly strongly rooted concepts by a new view, however be careful as the meaning of the term "open mind" is often twisted too. Also we should probably update our association from time to time just to keep them up with the new state of the world, only by sitting down and thinking about the world and discussing it with the right people.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The politics and views of [LRS](lrs.md) requires extreme open mindedness to be accepted by someone indoctrinated by the standard capitalist fascist propaganda of today.
|
The politics and views of [LRS](lrs.md) requires extreme open mindedness to be accepted by someone indoctrinated by the standard capitalist fascist propaganda of today.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Example Of Abuse
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Let's take a look at a simple example of how our shortcuts can be abused -- in recent times people in first world started to hate mass religion (let's now ignore [fedora extremists](atheism.md) that hate any religion whatsoever). Whether it's good or bad is now irrelevant, the important thing is there was some kind of reasoning behind this connection, for example that mass religion very often leads to abuse of power, brainwashing, corruption and so on. The thinking looks like this:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
dislike
|
||||||
|
we -------------------> abuse of power
|
||||||
|
: and brainwashing
|
||||||
|
: ^
|
||||||
|
: THEREFORE |
|
||||||
|
: .----------- usually |
|
||||||
|
: | leads to |
|
||||||
|
: | |
|
||||||
|
: V |
|
||||||
|
: we also dislike |
|
||||||
|
'- - - - - - - - - - > mass religion
|
||||||
|
(establishing shortcut)
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
After the initial step we end up with a convenient shortcut that simply states "we hate mass religion":
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
we -.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
| dislike
|
||||||
|
| *proven shortcut*
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
V
|
||||||
|
mass religion
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We should remember that this shortcut in fact means we oppose the evil behind it, i.e. abuse of power, brainwashing etc., but over time we forget this, we base our personality on simply hating the words "mass religion" as an axiom. We are furthermore told to always stand behind our opinions no matter what, so we harden the shortcut so much that we will never change it -- we are told it's a shame to deny something we used to think in the past (it will be called something like "integrity", identity, personality, ...). Now it's very easy to manipulate us -- even if the situation changed and mass religion no longer presented the dangers we originally opposed, we will still hate it just because we hate those words now -- but more importantly, it is now easy to for anyone to start doing the evils that mass religions used to do simply by calling themselves something else, as we only hate words and we'll never change (capitalists tell us it is a shame to change opinions). If for example [capitalism](capitalism.md) takes over the old role of mass religion, with all the things such as abuse of power, brainwashing, corruption, discrimination etc., we accept them easily, we are only focused on kicking the corpse of mass religion. [Our goalpost has been shifted](shifting_the_goalpost.md) due to the weakness in our thinking -- our shortcut we will never question because we don't want to change our values. This simple psychological trick works on 99.9999999999999% of people and is further perfected by applying a bit of brainwashing and cheap tricks such as [corporations](corporation.md) pretending to "stand on our side" by "hating the same thing" we do (when in fact corporation cannot love or hate anything, it is a robotic entity that can only strategically claim something) and fueling our hatred of the mass religion corpse, e.g. by applying [fear culture](fear_culture.md) (BEWARE PRIEST [PEDOPHILES](pedophilia.md)!), [influencers](influencer.md) (BE A COOL ATHEIST LIKE THIS YOUTUBER!), [ads](marketing.md), [fashion](fashion.md) (BUY THIS COOL HAT THAT TELLS EVERYONE YOU'RE AN ATHEIST!) etcetc. The situation now looks possibly like this:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
"DON'T THINK HERE"
|
||||||
|
"FOCUS ON HATING RELIGION!"
|
||||||
|
brainwashing barrier
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
we -. | abuse of power
|
||||||
|
| |_ and brainwashing
|
||||||
|
| | \_ ^
|
||||||
|
| \_ |
|
||||||
|
| dislike \_ always |
|
||||||
|
| \_lead to |
|
||||||
|
| \_ |
|
||||||
|
| \_ |
|
||||||
|
V \ |
|
||||||
|
mass religion <----------- capitalism
|
||||||
|
"WE ALSO DISLIKE THIS"
|
||||||
|
"WE ARE WITH YOU!"
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,8 @@ For the ones who possibly still don't get it, here is a little comparison. It is
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Of course, once science advances, it may stop being so simple as for everyone to be able to for example check the results that scientists found, that's without doubt, the point is simply that at the stage when the field starts being a religion, for whatever reason at all, we can no longer call it science, it is simply religion that evolved from science. That is all.
|
Of course, once science advances, it may stop being so simple as for everyone to be able to for example check the results that scientists found, that's without doubt, the point is simply that at the stage when the field starts being a religion, for whatever reason at all, we can no longer call it science, it is simply religion that evolved from science. That is all.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Soyence popularizators also like to contaminate science with emotion, with "stories" and [heroes](hero_culture.md) and other kind of bullshit that has no place in true science: true science is pure rationality and to that emotion is an obstacle. Science is a cold, emotionless tool -- if you don't see [beauty](beauty.md) in this fact alone, science is not for you.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Some further examples of soyence:
|
Some further examples of soyence:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- [gender studies](gender_studies.md) [LMAO](lmao.md)
|
- [gender studies](gender_studies.md) [LMAO](lmao.md)
|
||||||
|
|
@ -40,6 +42,7 @@ Some further examples of soyence:
|
||||||
- "We should burn these old books that say things we don't like, just in case. When Nazis did it it was different."
|
- "We should burn these old books that say things we don't like, just in case. When Nazis did it it was different."
|
||||||
- "This research was made by a [racist](racism.md) so it is invalid, also we should [lynch](cancel_culture.md) the guy just in case."
|
- "This research was made by a [racist](racism.md) so it is invalid, also we should [lynch](cancel_culture.md) the guy just in case."
|
||||||
- Neil de grass/Morgan Freeman "documentaries"
|
- Neil de grass/Morgan Freeman "documentaries"
|
||||||
|
- Deducing cool facts on TV about extinct animals from their skull shapes is Neil De grass stamp of approval legit thumbs up paleonthology science yay! :)))) But trying in on humans ([phrenology](phrenology.md)) is a bad bad NONO PSEUDOSCIENCE, neil de grass frown :(((
|
||||||
- "We can totally trust the results of commercial research."
|
- "We can totally trust the results of commercial research."
|
||||||
- "These negative results are useful but unexciting so let's not publish them, we gotta entertain our readers to stay on the market. We GOTTA TELL INSPIRATIONAL STORIES with our papers." --soyence journals
|
- "These negative results are useful but unexciting so let's not publish them, we gotta entertain our readers to stay on the market. We GOTTA TELL INSPIRATIONAL STORIES with our papers." --soyence journals
|
||||||
- "No, you can't research the details of historic events such as Holocaust." (see anti [Holocaust](holocaust.md) denial laws)
|
- "No, you can't research the details of historic events such as Holocaust." (see anti [Holocaust](holocaust.md) denial laws)
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
|
||||||
# Trolling
|
# Trolling
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Trolling (as a verb) is a fairly recent term that has evolved alongside the [Internet](internet.md) and whose meaning ranges from an activity of purposefully causing [drama](drama.md) (mostly on the Internet) for entertainment (the original, narrower meaning) to just shamelessly abusing rules of any system on the detriment of others (narrower meaning, e.g. *[patent](patent.md) trolling*, pre-election *media trolling* etc.). Core value of the wide-sense trolling is simply [fun](fun.md) on the detriment of others, but not every fun making can be called trolling -- bullying weaker, for example, isn't trolling, despite it bringing some fun; trolling has to have a bit of cleverness in it, it typically finds a way of legally do something nasty, i.e. [hacking](hacking.md) the rules of the game. Trolls are those who before the Internet would be called something like jokers or pranksters, however [real life](irl.md) pranks have limited potential -- on the Internet on the other hand trolling can flourish (likely owing to the aspect of [anonymity](anonymity.md), lack of nonverbal communication, lack of consequences and responsibility and so on), so this [art](art.md) has evolved into something more, it is by now an inseparable part of Internet [culture](culture.md) (and should probably become protected by Unesco). Trolling is not about being [evil](evil.md), it is about having fun, it is cherished by cool people who don't take things too seriously and can make fun of themselves and is therefore embraced by forums like [4chan](4chan.md); on the other hand it is demonized by those without sense of humor, those who fear the power of humor (e.g. dictators and fascists) and those who mostly get butthurt by it ([reddit](reddit.md), [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) and other "safe space" networks). [Evil](evil.md) is always afraid of fun.
|
Trolling (as a verb) is a fairly recent term that has evolved alongside the [Internet](internet.md) and whose meaning ranges from an activity of purposefully causing [drama](drama.md) (mostly on the Internet) for entertainment (the original, narrower meaning) to just shamelessly abusing rules of any system on the detriment of others (narrower meaning, e.g. *[patent](patent.md) trolling*, pre-election *media trolling* etc.). Core value of the wide-sense trolling is simply [fun](fun.md) on the detriment of others, but not every fun making can be called trolling -- bullying weaker, for example, isn't trolling, despite it bringing some fun; trolling has to have a bit of cleverness in it, it typically finds a way of legally do something nasty, i.e. [hacking](hacking.md) the rules of the game. Trolls are those who before the Internet would be called something like jokers or pranksters, however [real life](irl.md) pranks have limited potential -- on the Internet on the other hand trolling can flourish (likely owing to the aspect of [anonymity](anonymity.md), lack of nonverbal communication, lack of consequences and responsibility and so on), so this [art](art.md) has evolved into something more, it is by now an inseparable part of Internet [culture](culture.md) (and should probably become protected by Unesco). Some forms of trolling provide so much fun they're even illegal. Trolling is not about being [evil](evil.md), it is about having fun, it is cherished by cool people who don't take things too seriously and can make fun of themselves and is therefore embraced by forums like [4chan](4chan.md); on the other hand it is demonized by those without sense of humor, those who fear the power of humor (e.g. dictators and fascists) and those who mostly get butthurt by it ([reddit](reddit.md), [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) and other "safe space" networks). [Evil](evil.md) is always afraid of fun.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
NOTE: That who performs trolling is called a *troll*, a word taken from Nordic mythology where it stands for a fantastic, weird kind of creature that lives in forests, caves or under bridges. Trolls are often a [race](race.md) in many fantasy universes (e.g. Warcraft, LOTR, Harry Potter, ...) -- there their appearance isn't very unified, some make them big, stupid giants, others paint them as tall but human sized creatures with tusks and so on. Further on we'll just be discussing trolls as related to *trolling*.
|
NOTE: That who performs trolling is called a *troll*, a word taken from Nordic mythology where it stands for a fantastic, weird kind of creature that lives in forests, caves or under bridges. Trolls are often a [race](race.md) in many fantasy universes (e.g. Warcraft, LOTR, Harry Potter, ...) -- there their appearance isn't very unified, some make them big, stupid giants, others paint them as tall but human sized creatures with tusks and so on. Further on we'll just be discussing trolls as related to *trolling*.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ Here are some potentially entertaining ways of trolling (they'll be written from
|
||||||
- **The richfag**: As a rich faggot I can do literally what I want so for example I bought a forest and started a company that employs people who's job it is to just run around a tree for 8 hours every day -- my goal is to have every tree have one man running around it eventually. The company is not profitable, in fact it loses money but I don't care about that, I already have infinite money. The fun thing is the people are actually grateful because I created jobs basically for all nearby villages :D
|
- **The richfag**: As a rich faggot I can do literally what I want so for example I bought a forest and started a company that employs people who's job it is to just run around a tree for 8 hours every day -- my goal is to have every tree have one man running around it eventually. The company is not profitable, in fact it loses money but I don't care about that, I already have infinite money. The fun thing is the people are actually grateful because I created jobs basically for all nearby villages :D
|
||||||
- **Creative [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) vandalism aka [Creative TrollLolz](creative_commons.md)**: for example funny redirects or categorizations (put [Bill Gates](bill_gates.md) to "famous homosexuals" category or something), also consider vandalizing other wikis that usually don't have as much protection.
|
- **Creative [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) vandalism aka [Creative TrollLolz](creative_commons.md)**: for example funny redirects or categorizations (put [Bill Gates](bill_gates.md) to "famous homosexuals" category or something), also consider vandalizing other wikis that usually don't have as much protection.
|
||||||
- `a:hover { display: none; }`
|
- `a:hover { display: none; }`
|
||||||
|
- **Stream/game raids** became very popular with the onset of streaming and child abusing MMOs, maybe the most iconic was the Habbo Hotel "Pool's closed" raid. [4chan](4chan.md) is one of such raid enjoyers, however very specialized groups such as soyjak.party emerged who live off almost exclusively of organizing such raids. A stream raid mostly goes like this: some toxic tranny prostitute is making children masturbate on Twitch and figures out it will steal more attention (money) by forcing audience interaction in form of some gayme in which the audience can participate -- this is where the fun begins. There are shitty games that for example let people write rap songs that are then read by text to speech synthesizer or choose titles for albums or the marble racing game where users can set their avatar pictures etc. Of course here comes the party that just storms this with images of goatse or some [nigger](nigger.md) quotes, the streamer starts to rage because he is now showing an image of protruding hairy asshole to 10000 toddlers who just wanted to watch overwatch or roblox, while in a robotic voice in the background is quoting Hitler and calling for the final solution, which of course is not very good for the streamer's career :D In best scenarios the streamer gets banned. { See for example these video clip gems at https://soyjakwiki.net/Jackbox_Raiding#Clips :D ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
- **Classic trollz** revolve around creating [drama](drama.md) on forums -- this is kind of an [art](art.md) as you have to keep the right balance of seriousness and stupidity; too much of the former and you're not trolling anyone, too much of the latter and you're just spotted as obvious troll. It's definitely not about logging on a starting to drop the [N-words](nigger.md) and insulting everyone, that's just an instant ban that ends the fun; you rather want to start slow, get many people seriously involved in the discussion, be polite and then slightly steer the talk towards something controversial (nice if you pretend to be part of some "oppressed minority"). Then you just make it look like you're just an uneducated simple minded individual who kind of happens to lean towards an opinion the others truly hate, but you have to keep their hope that they can convince you to change your opinion, so still try to be polite, just so you keep arguing with them and wasting more and more of their time until they start losing their shit and the thread explodes into [hitler](hitler.md) arguments etc., then just watch and enjoy.
|
- **Classic trollz** revolve around creating [drama](drama.md) on forums -- this is kind of an [art](art.md) as you have to keep the right balance of seriousness and stupidity; too much of the former and you're not trolling anyone, too much of the latter and you're just spotted as obvious troll. It's definitely not about logging on a starting to drop the [N-words](nigger.md) and insulting everyone, that's just an instant ban that ends the fun; you rather want to start slow, get many people seriously involved in the discussion, be polite and then slightly steer the talk towards something controversial (nice if you pretend to be part of some "oppressed minority"). Then you just make it look like you're just an uneducated simple minded individual who kind of happens to lean towards an opinion the others truly hate, but you have to keep their hope that they can convince you to change your opinion, so still try to be polite, just so you keep arguing with them and wasting more and more of their time until they start losing their shit and the thread explodes into [hitler](hitler.md) arguments etc., then just watch and enjoy.
|
||||||
- **Weird life goal troll**: This one requires extreme dedication and is a bit risky, but it might be one of the highest trolling peaks if performed successfully and well. So what's the troll here? We know that life goal cannot be objectively set, you can make your life goal whatever you want and no one can ever objectively refute it. So you can for example set your life goal to just walk forward -- you will dedicate everything to only walking forward as much as you can. You will stop going to work, you will only eat and drink if absolutely necessary, you'll just get up from the bed one day and start walking over the country in your pajamas -- if people ask you if you're alright you just say "yes, thank you". If you are starving, you just grab nearest food and eat it, if you need to sleep, you just lie down somewhere and sleep and then just walk again. Soon you'll probably be taken to mental asylum -- there you have to just prove you're completely normal, convince them you know what you're doing, that you're not feeling any anxiety or depression, that you hear no voices, you have only set walking as your life goal -- there is no objective way to refute this life goal. You will probably end up in asylum or jail anyway sooner or later, then just try to maximize walking, be nice and lie if you have to. If they lead you to the court, just turn around and start walking out of the building. If they put you in chains, just behave nicely and say you won't try to run away -- if they take the chains down, just start walking away. Whenever you get out of jail, just start walking again and so on. Now there is a risk that you may just waste your life without attracting any attention, but you may also become famous and then highlight the fact that current society is extremely retarded and is not ready for people who aren't conforming and just set their life goal arbitrarily.
|
- **Weird life goal troll**: This one requires extreme dedication and is a bit risky, but it might be one of the highest trolling peaks if performed successfully and well. So what's the troll here? We know that life goal cannot be objectively set, you can make your life goal whatever you want and no one can ever objectively refute it. So you can for example set your life goal to just walk forward -- you will dedicate everything to only walking forward as much as you can. You will stop going to work, you will only eat and drink if absolutely necessary, you'll just get up from the bed one day and start walking over the country in your pajamas -- if people ask you if you're alright you just say "yes, thank you". If you are starving, you just grab nearest food and eat it, if you need to sleep, you just lie down somewhere and sleep and then just walk again. Soon you'll probably be taken to mental asylum -- there you have to just prove you're completely normal, convince them you know what you're doing, that you're not feeling any anxiety or depression, that you hear no voices, you have only set walking as your life goal -- there is no objective way to refute this life goal. You will probably end up in asylum or jail anyway sooner or later, then just try to maximize walking, be nice and lie if you have to. If they lead you to the court, just turn around and start walking out of the building. If they put you in chains, just behave nicely and say you won't try to run away -- if they take the chains down, just start walking away. Whenever you get out of jail, just start walking again and so on. Now there is a risk that you may just waste your life without attracting any attention, but you may also become famous and then highlight the fact that current society is extremely retarded and is not ready for people who aren't conforming and just set their life goal arbitrarily.
|
||||||
- ...
|
- ...
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
100
wiki_stats.md
100
wiki_stats.md
|
|
@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
|
||||||
This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
|
This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- number of articles: 580
|
- number of articles: 580
|
||||||
- number of commits: 815
|
- number of commits: 816
|
||||||
- total size of all texts in bytes: 3882163
|
- total size of all texts in bytes: 3892299
|
||||||
- total number of lines of article texts: 29510
|
- total number of lines of article texts: 29552
|
||||||
- number of script lines: 262
|
- number of script lines: 262
|
||||||
- occurences of the word "person": 7
|
- occurences of the word "person": 7
|
||||||
- occurences of the word "nigger": 86
|
- occurences of the word "nigger": 86
|
||||||
|
|
@ -35,60 +35,72 @@ longest articles:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
top 50 5+ letter words:
|
top 50 5+ letter words:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- which (2225)
|
- which (2227)
|
||||||
- there (1687)
|
- there (1692)
|
||||||
- people (1477)
|
- people (1478)
|
||||||
- example (1250)
|
- example (1259)
|
||||||
- other (1204)
|
- other (1207)
|
||||||
- number (1123)
|
- number (1125)
|
||||||
- software (1076)
|
- software (1078)
|
||||||
- about (1013)
|
- about (1017)
|
||||||
- program (885)
|
- program (886)
|
||||||
- their (826)
|
- their (829)
|
||||||
- because (796)
|
- because (798)
|
||||||
- would (785)
|
- would (785)
|
||||||
- called (761)
|
- called (761)
|
||||||
|
- being (750)
|
||||||
- language (742)
|
- language (742)
|
||||||
- being (742)
|
|
||||||
- numbers (737)
|
- numbers (737)
|
||||||
- computer (732)
|
- computer (732)
|
||||||
- things (709)
|
- things (710)
|
||||||
- simple (705)
|
- simple (709)
|
||||||
- something (703)
|
- something (707)
|
||||||
- without (667)
|
- without (670)
|
||||||
- function (661)
|
- function (661)
|
||||||
- programming (657)
|
- programming (657)
|
||||||
- these (623)
|
- these (624)
|
||||||
- however (622)
|
- however (622)
|
||||||
- different (620)
|
- different (621)
|
||||||
- world (582)
|
- world (585)
|
||||||
- should (567)
|
- should (567)
|
||||||
- system (565)
|
- system (566)
|
||||||
- games (554)
|
- games (558)
|
||||||
- doesn (551)
|
- doesn (551)
|
||||||
- point (544)
|
- point (546)
|
||||||
- society (541)
|
- society (541)
|
||||||
- though (518)
|
- though (520)
|
||||||
- while (515)
|
- while (515)
|
||||||
- memory (508)
|
- memory (508)
|
||||||
- drummyfish (506)
|
- drummyfish (506)
|
||||||
- using (501)
|
- using (501)
|
||||||
- still (489)
|
- still (490)
|
||||||
- possible (486)
|
- possible (487)
|
||||||
- similar (482)
|
- similar (483)
|
||||||
|
- course (480)
|
||||||
- technology (479)
|
- technology (479)
|
||||||
- course (478)
|
- simply (478)
|
||||||
- simply (475)
|
- https (453)
|
||||||
- https (457)
|
- value (441)
|
||||||
- really (438)
|
- really (438)
|
||||||
- value (434)
|
- always (434)
|
||||||
- always (430)
|
- extremely (429)
|
||||||
- extremely (426)
|
- actually (424)
|
||||||
- actually (423)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
latest changes:
|
latest changes:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
Date: Tue Jun 4 21:22:45 2024 +0200
|
||||||
|
21st_century.md
|
||||||
|
books.md
|
||||||
|
data_hoarding.md
|
||||||
|
dog.md
|
||||||
|
main.md
|
||||||
|
minimalism.md
|
||||||
|
privacy.md
|
||||||
|
random_page.md
|
||||||
|
soyence.md
|
||||||
|
wiki_pages.md
|
||||||
|
wiki_stats.md
|
||||||
Date: Mon Jun 3 21:20:36 2024 +0200
|
Date: Mon Jun 3 21:20:36 2024 +0200
|
||||||
bloat.md
|
bloat.md
|
||||||
copyright.md
|
copyright.md
|
||||||
|
|
@ -110,18 +122,6 @@ Date: Sun Jun 2 12:40:38 2024 +0200
|
||||||
noise.md
|
noise.md
|
||||||
random_page.md
|
random_page.md
|
||||||
wiki_pages.md
|
wiki_pages.md
|
||||||
wiki_stats.md
|
|
||||||
www.md
|
|
||||||
yes_they_can.md
|
|
||||||
Date: Fri May 31 21:16:28 2024 +0200
|
|
||||||
anarch.md
|
|
||||||
beauty.md
|
|
||||||
books.md
|
|
||||||
dog.md
|
|
||||||
doom.md
|
|
||||||
duke3d.md
|
|
||||||
exercises.md
|
|
||||||
fun.md
|
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
most wanted pages:
|
most wanted pages:
|
||||||
|
|
@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ most wanted pages:
|
||||||
most popular and lonely pages:
|
most popular and lonely pages:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- [lrs](lrs.md) (281)
|
- [lrs](lrs.md) (281)
|
||||||
- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (215)
|
- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (216)
|
||||||
- [c](c.md) (213)
|
- [c](c.md) (213)
|
||||||
- [bloat](bloat.md) (201)
|
- [bloat](bloat.md) (201)
|
||||||
- [free_software](free_software.md) (165)
|
- [free_software](free_software.md) (165)
|
||||||
|
|
@ -158,7 +158,7 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
|
||||||
- [suckless](suckless.md) (135)
|
- [suckless](suckless.md) (135)
|
||||||
- [proprietary](proprietary.md) (117)
|
- [proprietary](proprietary.md) (117)
|
||||||
- [computer](computer.md) (95)
|
- [computer](computer.md) (95)
|
||||||
- [kiss](kiss.md) (93)
|
- [kiss](kiss.md) (94)
|
||||||
- [modern](modern.md) (90)
|
- [modern](modern.md) (90)
|
||||||
- [minimalism](minimalism.md) (88)
|
- [minimalism](minimalism.md) (88)
|
||||||
- [linux](linux.md) (88)
|
- [linux](linux.md) (88)
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
2
woman.md
2
woman.md
|
|
@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ Historically women have been privileged over men -- while men had to [work](work
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Women also can't drive, operate machines, they can't compare even to the worst men in sports, both physical and mental such as [chess](chess.md). Women have to have separate leagues and more relaxed rules, e.g. the title Woman Grand Master (WGM) in chess has far lower requirements to obtain than regular Grand Master (GM). (According to [Elo](elo.md) rating the best woman chess player in history would have only 8% chance of winning against current best male who would have 48% chance of winning). On the International Mathematical Olympiad only 43 out of 1338 medals were obtained by females. There are too many funny cases and video compilations of women facing men in sports (watch them before they're censored lol), e.g. the infamous Vaevictis female "progaming" team or the [football](football.md) match between the US national women team (probably the best women team in the world) vs some random under 15 years old boy's team which of course the women team lost. LMAO there is even a video of 1 skinny boy beating 9 women in boxing. Of course there are arguments that worse performance of women in mental sports is caused culturally; women aren't led so much to playing chess, therefore there are fewer women in chess and so the probability of a good woman player appearing is lower. This may be partially true even though genetic factors seem at least equally important and it may equally be true that not so many women play chess simply because they're not naturally good at it; nevertheless the fact that women are generally worse at chess than men stands, regardless of its cause -- a randomly picked men will most likely be better at chess than a randomly picked woman, and that's what matters in the end. Also if women are displaced from chess by culture, then what is the area they are displaced to? If women are as capable as men, then for any area dominated by men there should be an area equally dominated by women, however we see that anywhere men face women men win big time, even in the woman activities such as cooking and fashion design. Feminists will say that men simply oppress women everywhere, but this just means that women are dominated by men everywhere, which means they are more skilled and capable at everything, there is no way out -- yes, antelope are oppressed by lions, but it's because lions are stronger than antelopes. Here we simply argue that women are weaker than men, not that oppressing women is okay -- it isn't. Furthermore if women were weaker but not by that much, we should statistically see at least occasional dominance by a woman, but we practically don't, it's really almost impossible to find a single such case in history, which indicates women are VERY SIGNIFICANTLY weaker, i.e. not something we negligible we could just ignore. Being a woman correlates to losing to a man almost perfectly, it is a great predictor, basically as strong as can appear in science. It makes sense from the evolutionary standpoint as well, women simply evolved to take care of children, guard fire and save resource consumption by being only as strong as necessarily required for this task, while men had to be stronger and smarter to do the hard job of providing food and protection.
|
Women also can't drive, operate machines, they can't compare even to the worst men in sports, both physical and mental such as [chess](chess.md). Women have to have separate leagues and more relaxed rules, e.g. the title Woman Grand Master (WGM) in chess has far lower requirements to obtain than regular Grand Master (GM). (According to [Elo](elo.md) rating the best woman chess player in history would have only 8% chance of winning against current best male who would have 48% chance of winning). On the International Mathematical Olympiad only 43 out of 1338 medals were obtained by females. There are too many funny cases and video compilations of women facing men in sports (watch them before they're censored lol), e.g. the infamous Vaevictis female "progaming" team or the [football](football.md) match between the US national women team (probably the best women team in the world) vs some random under 15 years old boy's team which of course the women team lost. LMAO there is even a video of 1 skinny boy beating 9 women in boxing. Of course there are arguments that worse performance of women in mental sports is caused culturally; women aren't led so much to playing chess, therefore there are fewer women in chess and so the probability of a good woman player appearing is lower. This may be partially true even though genetic factors seem at least equally important and it may equally be true that not so many women play chess simply because they're not naturally good at it; nevertheless the fact that women are generally worse at chess than men stands, regardless of its cause -- a randomly picked men will most likely be better at chess than a randomly picked woman, and that's what matters in the end. Also if women are displaced from chess by culture, then what is the area they are displaced to? If women are as capable as men, then for any area dominated by men there should be an area equally dominated by women, however we see that anywhere men face women men win big time, even in the woman activities such as cooking and fashion design. Feminists will say that men simply oppress women everywhere, but this just means that women are dominated by men everywhere, which means they are more skilled and capable at everything, there is no way out -- yes, antelope are oppressed by lions, but it's because lions are stronger than antelopes. Here we simply argue that women are weaker than men, not that oppressing women is okay -- it isn't. Furthermore if women were weaker but not by that much, we should statistically see at least occasional dominance by a woman, but we practically don't, it's really almost impossible to find a single such case in history, which indicates women are VERY SIGNIFICANTLY weaker, i.e. not something we negligible we could just ignore. Being a woman correlates to losing to a man almost perfectly, it is a great predictor, basically as strong as can appear in science. It makes sense from the evolutionary standpoint as well, women simply evolved to take care of children, guard fire and save resource consumption by being only as strong as necessarily required for this task, while men had to be stronger and smarter to do the hard job of providing food and protection.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
{ I actually enjoy women football, mostly for its comedic value. ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Now because today's brainwashed reader will see this as "[sexism](sexism.md)", let us remind ourselves that this is completely OK. Women are weaker, but in a [good society](less_retarded_society.md) this doesn't matter as in a good society people don't have to compete or prove their usefulness, everyone is loved equally, weak or strong. The issue here is not pointing out our differences but perpetuating a [shitty society](capitalism.md).
|
Now because today's brainwashed reader will see this as "[sexism](sexism.md)", let us remind ourselves that this is completely OK. Women are weaker, but in a [good society](less_retarded_society.md) this doesn't matter as in a good society people don't have to compete or prove their usefulness, everyone is loved equally, weak or strong. The issue here is not pointing out our differences but perpetuating a [shitty society](capitalism.md).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A woman does super stupid shit like pay all her (or her husband's) life savings for silicon breast implants, then wear a dress that basically consist solely of cleavage but then when a man makes eye contact with her breasts during conversation she's like "WHY U NOT LOOOKING IN MY EYEEEEEEEES, STOP RAAAAPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIING MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!". Beware -- a woman possesses the dangerous weapon of seduction which she plentifully makes use of, e.g. for gold digging. A woman is a master of pretense. A wisdom as old as mankind itself states that "you cannot live with a woman, and you cannot live without her" -- this is true, though the latter is much easier to do, especially lately. A woman doesn't think logically, she thinks emotionally (menstruation and their hormone levels jumping all over the place further make this yet much worse), so what's true or false depends on how she feels at the moment OR in the future via so called reverse causality: a woman saying "yes" can actually mean "no" if 20 years later she decides it actually meant "no" -- an action in the future determines the past. Physicists weren't able to explain this phenomenon yet; in fact no male is probably ever capable of understanding a woman.
|
A woman does super stupid shit like pay all her (or her husband's) life savings for silicon breast implants, then wear a dress that basically consist solely of cleavage but then when a man makes eye contact with her breasts during conversation she's like "WHY U NOT LOOOKING IN MY EYEEEEEEEES, STOP RAAAAPIIIIIIIIIIIIIIING MEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!". Beware -- a woman possesses the dangerous weapon of seduction which she plentifully makes use of, e.g. for gold digging. A woman is a master of pretense. A wisdom as old as mankind itself states that "you cannot live with a woman, and you cannot live without her" -- this is true, though the latter is much easier to do, especially lately. A woman doesn't think logically, she thinks emotionally (menstruation and their hormone levels jumping all over the place further make this yet much worse), so what's true or false depends on how she feels at the moment OR in the future via so called reverse causality: a woman saying "yes" can actually mean "no" if 20 years later she decides it actually meant "no" -- an action in the future determines the past. Physicists weren't able to explain this phenomenon yet; in fact no male is probably ever capable of understanding a woman.
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue