Update

2024-12-14 16:25:29 +01:00 · 2024-12-14 16:25:29 +01:00 · 9284009450
commit 9284009450
parent ea07d624a8
19 changed files with 1932 additions and 1906 deletions
--- a/debugging.md
+++ b/debugging.md
@ -130,4 +130,10 @@ Additionally these may help deal with bugs as well:

 This is kind of an improper YOLO way of trying to fix bugs, you just change a lot of stuff in your program in hopes a bug will go away, it rarely works, doesn't really get rid of the bug (just of its manifestation at best) and can at best perhaps be a simple [hotfix](hotfix.md). Remember **if you don't understand how you fixed a bug, you didn't actually fix it**.

-TODO: mini gdb tutorial
+TODO: mini gdb tutorial
+
+## See Also
+
+- [optimization](optimization.md)
+- [refactoring](refactoring.md)
+- [works on my machine](works_on_my_machine.md)
--- a/disease.md
+++ b/disease.md
@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ Disease is a bad state of living organism's health caused by failure of its inne
 - [ambition](ambition.md)
 - aphantasia
 - "asexuality"
+- assburger
 - [assholism](assertiveness.md)
 - [audiophilia](audiophilia.md)
 - [avoidant personality disorder](avpd.md) (aka ultimate minimalist disease)
--- a/drummyfish.md
+++ b/drummyfish.md
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@

 Drummyfish (also known as *tastyfish*, *drummy*, *drumy*, *smellyfish* and *i forcefeed my diarrhea to capitalism*) is a [programmer](programming.md), [anarchopacifist](anpac.md), [heretic](heresy.md), wannabe [generalist](generalism.md), ban [speedrunner](speedrun.md) and proponent of [free software/culture](free_software.md), who started [this wiki](lrs_wiki.md) and invented the kind of [software](software.md) it focuses on: [less retarded software](lrs.md) (LRS), as well as [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md). Besides others he has written [Anarch](anarch.md), [small3dlib](small3dlib.md), [raycastlib](raycastlib.md), [smallchesslib](smallchesslib.md), [tinyphysicsengine](tinyphysicsengine.md), [SAF](saf.md) and [comun](comun.md) (and some older but technologically shittier projects such as [LibreMage](libremage.md), [Steamer Duck](steamer_duck.md) etc.). He has also been creating [free culture](free_culture.md) [art](art.md) and otherwise contributing to free projects such as [OpenMW](openm.md); he buys and digitizes old public domain books and has been contributing with [public domain](pd.md) art of all kind (2D, 3D, music, ...) and writings to [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) (no longer cause ban), [Wikimedia Commons](wm_commons.md) (also banned now), [opengameart](oga.md), [libregamewiki](lgw.md), freesound and others. Drummyfish is insane/neuroretarded, suffering from anxiety/[depression](depression.md)/etcetc. (diagnosed [avoidant personality disorder](avpd.md), also known as minimalist's brain damage, see also [psyops](psyops.md)) and has more than once been called a [schizo](schizo.md), though psychiatrists didn't officially diagnose him with schizophrenia (yet). He sometimes [self harms](self_harm.md), both physically and socially. All in all, psychiatrists say he is insane but in reality he is the only sane man in the world, and that is what he suffers from. Due to spreading uncensored truth, helping and loving others and revealing corruption he is banned and censored on many places on the Internet, including [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) (literally just linked to personal site from personal page), Wikimedia Commons, [4chan](4chan.md) (made a pedo joke), [GitLab](gitlab.md) (hosted this wiki lol), codeberg (because "?reasons?"), watchpeopledie.tv (made a sarcastic Nazi joke or something), many [subreddits](reddit.md), some [Xonotic](xonotic.md) and [Openarena](openarena.md) servers, ["Rational"Wiki](rationalwiki.md) { well, probably, I just vandalized it and never came back to check lol :D ~drummyfish } etc. He is also being constantly stalked by some pissed off impotent pedophobe (:D), whom he still loves by the way <3, and which drummyfish appreciates as it makes him set many ban [speedrunning](speedrun.md) records and also become more self sufficient and not rely so much on the mainstream, censored platforms. Drummyfish also has no [real life](irl.md) and is pretty retarded when it comes to leading [projects](project.md) or otherwise dealing with people or [practical life](irl.md). Drummyfish's political compass is off the charts, he once tried to take the political compass test, the computer got confused and exploded. He is also a [wizard](wizard.md).

-**Drummyfish is the most physically disgusting bastard on [Earth](earth.md)**, no [woman](woman.md) ever loved him, he is so ugly people get suicidal thoughts from seeing any part of him. He is also very stupid.
+**Drummyfish is the most physically disgusting bastard on [Earth](earth.md)**, no [woman](woman.md) ever loved him, he is so ugly people get suicidal thoughts from seeing any part of him. He is also very stupid. Drummyfish also **smells like nightmare**, even after he showers, he was independently told so by many different people, he can't even exist in society, his smell kills everything in 1km radius.

 { I've been told I'm just a fakecel whoring for attention here -- let me say I'm not faking it and I don't desire attention, attention scares me, but I feel the need to say I am repulsive -- yes, I really make women run away from me and I don't know why, on rare occasions I had some very close, almost 100% certain chances to score but it never happened, something is seriously wrong with me and my curse is that I don't know what it is so I can't even try to fix it, so trust me I'm telling the truth. Maybe it's not apparent from my photos that I'm ugly (I think when I was younger I actually looked quite OK, but everyone looks fine at a young age), maybe it's my smell, way of talking, I don't know, but they certainly hate me. ~drummyfish }

--- a/free_software.md
+++ b/free_software.md
@ -56,18 +56,19 @@ Free software was invented by [Richard Stallman](rms.md) in the 1980s. His free

 TODO: something here

-**By 2024 free software is dead** -- yes, FSF and some free software "activists" are still around, but they don't bear any significance, just like the hippies lost any significance after 1960s etc. Corruption, politics and [free market](capitalism.md) have finally killed the movement, [open $ource](open_source.md) prevailed and it is now redefining even the basic pillars of the four freedoms (partial openness or just source availability is now practically synonymous with "open source"), probably sealing the fate of technology, free software seems to have only postponed [capitalist disaster](capitalist_singularity.md) by a few decades, which is still a great feat. { It's been pointed out to me that even some project that call themselves "free" or "libre", such as "Libre"Boot, are in fact breaking the rules of freedom now, for example by including proprietary blobs. ~drummyfish }
+**By 2024 free software is dead** -- yes, [FSF](fsf.md) and a few other software "activists" are still around, but they don't bear any significance anymore, the free software movement disappeared just like hippies disappeared with 1960s.  FSF has become just an email spamming organization supporting lesbian [rights](rights_culture.md) on the Internet, and those who truly believe in free software form a community that by its size is comparable to such insignificantly small groups as [suckless](suckless.md) for example. Everything is now "[open $ource](open_source.md)", which only means one thing: it is hosted on [GitHub](github.md), and doesn't at all imply free code, available code, non-malicious features or even perhaps such a laughable thing as pursuit of freedom. Corruption, politics and [free market](capitalism.md) have finally killed the free software movement, [open $ource](open_source.md) prevailed exactly as it was planned by capitalists at the meeting in 1998, and it has now redefined even the basic pillars of the four freedoms (partial openness, [fair use](fair_use.md) or just source availability is now practically synonymous with "open source") -- just like for example "thou shalt not kill" was removed from Christianity because it wasn't convenient for the overlords -- and by this the fate of technology is sealed, free software seems to have only postponed the [capitalist disaster](capitalist_singularity.md) by a few decades, which is still a remarkable feat. { It's been pointed out to me that even some project that call themselves "free" or "libre", such as "Libre"Boot, are in fact breaking the rules of freedom now, for example by including proprietary blobs. ~drummyfish }

 ## "Free" Software Alternatives, Pseudo Free Environments AKA What Freedom Really Is

-**The "free software alternatives" question** is one that's constantly being discussed under [capitalism](capitalism.md): [corporations](corporation.md) try to forcefully keep users enslaved by proprietary software environments while free software proponents and users themselves want to free the users with "alternatives" made as free software. A very common mistake for a free software newcomer to make is to try to **"drop-in replace proprietary software with free software"**; a user used to proprietary software and its ways just wants the programs he's used to, just "without ads and subscriptions etc.". This doesn't work, or only to an extremely limited scale, because the whole proprietary world is made and DESIGNED from the ground up to allow user exploitation as much as possible, with e.g. building such thing like [consumerism](consumerism.md) right into the design of visual elements of the software etc., i.e. proprietary vs free software is not just about a legal [license](license.md), but whole philosophy of technology, asking things such as [why are we so obsessed over "updates"](update_culture.md) or [why are we freaking out about privacy](privacy.md). Trying to drop-in replace proprietary technology with 1 to 1 looking free software is like trying to replace whole capitalism with an "environment friendly capitalism" in which everything works the same except we have cars made of wood and skyscrapers made of recycled paper -- indeed, one sees that to get rid of the destructive nature of capitalism we really have to replace capitalism as such with all its basic concepts with something fundamentally different; and the situation is same with proprietary software.
+**The "free software alternatives" question** is one that comes up often under [capitalism](capitalism.md): [corporations](corporation.md) try to forcefully keep users enslaved by proprietary environments while free software proponents and users themselves want to free the users with "alternatives" made as free software. A very common mistake for a free software newcomer to make is to try to **"drop-in replace proprietary software with free software"**; a user used to proprietary software and its ways just wants the programs he's used to, just "gratis, without ads and subscriptions etc.". This doesn't work, or only to a very small degree, because the whole proprietary world is made and DESIGNED from the ground up to allow user exploitation as much as possible, e.g. with embedding such thing like [consumerism](consumerism.md) right into the design of visual elements of the software etc., i.e. proprietary vs free software is not just about a legal [license](license.md), but whole philosophy of technology, asking things such as [why are we so obsessed over "updates"](update_culture.md), why do we aim for [maximalism](maximalism.md) or [why are we freaking out about privacy](privacy.md). Trying to drop-in replace proprietary technology with 1 to 1 looking free software is like trying to replace whole capitalism with an "environment friendly capitalism" in which everything works the same except we have cars made of wood and skyscrapers made of recycled paper -- indeed, one sees that to get rid of the destructive nature of capitalism we really have to replace capitalism as such with all its basic concepts with something fundamentally different; and the situation is same with proprietary software. If you learned to do computing with proprietary software, you are not only being exploited by proprietary software, you also additionally learned to do computing the WRONG way -- solution is therefore not just in replacing the proprietary software, but also learning to do computing WELL.

-For example most users nowadays want [GUI](gui.md) in all programs, which is how they've been nurtured by capitalism, however we have to realize that **a truly ([de facto](de_facto.md), not just legally) free software has to be [minimalist](minimalism.md)** and so most TRULY free software will mostly work only from the [command line](cli.md); a command line program is not necessarily harder or less comfortable to use (users are just nurtured to think so by capitalism), it is however inherently more free than a GUI one in all ways (not only by being more flexible, efficient, [portable](portability.md) and non-discrimination, but also simpler and therefore e.g. modifiable by more people). We have to realize that a **freedom respecting computing environment INHERENTLY LOOKS DIFFERENT from the proprietary one**, the matter is NOT only about the license (free license is just a necessary condition to allow freedom under capitalism, however it is not a sufficient condition for freedom). Some projects calling themselves "free" (or rather "[open source](open_source.md)") make the mistake (sometimes intentionally, exactly to e.g. more easily pull over more users from the proprietary land) of simply mimicking proprietary ways 1 to 1 -- see e.g. [Fediverse](fediverse.md) ("free" facebook/twitter/etc.), [Blender](blender.md) etc. -- these are technically/legally free, but not actually, de-facto free. While a short-sighted view tells us this wins more users from the proprietary platforms, in long term we see we are just rebuilding dystopias, only painted with brighter colors so as to make them look friendlier (and oftentimes this is exactly the aim of the authors). Transitioning to TRULY free platforms is harder -- **one has to relearn basic things** such as, as has been mentioned, working with command line rather than GUI -- but ultimately right as one really gets more freedom, however under capitalist pressure and nurturing it is a hard thing to do, requiring extorting a lot of energy to resist the pressures of society.
+For example most users nowadays want [GUI](gui.md) in all programs, which is how they've been nurtured by capitalism, however we have to realize that **a truly ([de facto](de_facto.md), not just legally) free software has to be [minimalist](minimalism.md)** and so most TRULY free software will mostly work only from the [command line](cli.md); a command line program is not necessarily harder or less comfortable to use (users are just nurtured to think so by capitalism), it is however inherently more free than a GUI one in all ways (not only by being more flexible, efficient, [portable](portability.md) and non-discrimination, but also simpler and therefore e.g. modifiable by more people). We have to realize that a **freedom respecting computing environment INHERENTLY LOOKS DIFFERENT from the proprietary one**, the matter is NOT only about the license (free license is just a necessary condition to allow freedom under capitalism, however it is not a sufficient condition for freedom). People confronted with this fact for the first time usually start freaking out and panicking and they go full denial mode and start yelling NO THAT NOT TRUE THAT CAN'T BE TRUE, they erect a mental blocker and start desperately clutching onto ANY excuse at all they can find, they will start googling youtubers who say the opposite so they can remain in they sweet dreamlike state in which they don't have to abandon their favorite belowed Windows games and lovely pimped out GUI and LED keyboards they post on Twitter every day -- nevertheless this is 100% hard to swallow truth pill that is NECESSARY to be accepted if one wants to live in truth; not accepting this means choosing the way of comfortable self deceit of the eternal [NPC](npc.md). Some projects calling themselves "free" (or rather "[open source](open_source.md)") make the mistake (sometimes intentionally, exactly to e.g. more easily pull over more users from the proprietary land) of simply mimicking proprietary ways 1 to 1 -- see e.g. [Fediverse](fediverse.md) ("free" facebook/twitter/etc.), [Blender](blender.md) etc. -- these are technically/legally free, but not actually, de-facto free. While a short-sighted view tells us this wins more users from the proprietary platforms, in long term we see we are just rebuilding dystopias, only painted with brighter colors so as to make them look friendlier (and oftentimes this is exactly the aim of the authors). Transitioning to TRULY free platforms is harder -- **one has to relearn basic things** such as, as has been mentioned, working with command line rather than GUI -- but ultimately right as one really gets more freedom, however under capitalist pressure and nurturing it is a hard thing to do, requiring extorting a lot of energy to resist the pressures of society.

-After some years dealing with software freedom (in serious ways, making money doesn't count) many -- including [us](lrs.md) -- realize that the "licensing" fuss and legal questions, though important, are the surface, shallow views of freedom; one that also gets exploited by many (see e.g. [openwashing](openwashing.md)). Those who seek real freedom will sooner or later find themselves focusing on [minimalism](minimalism.md) and simplicity, e.g. [LRS](lrs.md), [suckless](suckless.md), [Bitreich](bitreich.md) etc. Going yet further, one starts to see the inherent interconnections of technology and whole society, and has to become interested also in social concepts, hence our proposal of [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md).
+After some years dealing with software freedom (in serious ways, making money doesn't count) many -- including [us](lrs.md) -- realize that the "licensing" fuss and legal questions, though important, are the surface, shallow views of freedom; one that also gets exploited by many (see e.g. [openwashing](openwashing.md)). Those who seek real freedom will sooner or later find themselves focusing on [minimalism](minimalism.md) and simplicity, e.g. [LRS](lrs.md), [suckless](suckless.md), [Bitreich](bitreich.md), [DuskOS](duskos.md) etc. Going yet further, one starts to see the inherent interconnections of technology and whole society, and has to become interested also in social concepts, hence our proposal of [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md).

 ## See Also

+- [GNU](gnu.md) and [FSF](fsf.md)
 - [free hardware](free_hardware.md)
 - [open source](open_source.md)
 - [free culture](free_culture.md)
@ -75,4 +76,4 @@ After some years dealing with software freedom (in serious ways, making money do
 - [copyfree](copyfree.md)
 - [freedom distance](freedom_distance.md)
 - [FreeLore](freelore.md)
- [kosher software](kosher_software.md)
+- [kosher software](kosher_software.md)
--- a/freedom.md
+++ b/freedom.md
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ By the same reasoning we'll find that **[generalism](generalism.md) and self suf

 **In society it is impossible to have freedom while also safely ensuring it won't be abused at the same time.** You have to choose one or the other.

-**Freedom implies elimination of responsibility.** Beginners often erroneously think that freedom must come with responsibility, but investing about a minute of thinking reveals the opposite is in fact true. Responsibility implies punishment for bad decisions, even if the punishment is only internal (feeling bad about what one has done etc.) and a threat of punishment for some decision effectively removes the option, i.e. ad absurdum responsibility is like having a man pointing gun at you, saying "don't you dare do A, or else" -- you are not physically prevented from doing A, but the threat effectively makes you not be able to choose A, reducing freedom. The logic of "freedom with responsibility" therefore argues that for example people under oppressive totalitarian regimes have [freedom of speech](free_speech.md) because their mouth is not physically sewed shut to prevent them from speaking, they can really say anything they want, they just have to accept they will be executed along with their whole family if they say something bad.
+**Freedom implies elimination of responsibility.** Beginners often erroneously think that freedom must come with responsibility, but investing about a minute of thinking reveals the opposite is in fact true. Responsibility implies punishment for bad decisions, even if the punishment is only internal (feeling bad about what one has done etc.) and a threat of punishment for some decision effectively removes the option, i.e. ad absurdum responsibility is like having a man pointing gun at you, saying "don't you dare do A, or else" -- you are not physically prevented from doing A, but the threat effectively makes you not be able to choose A, reducing freedom. The logic of "freedom with responsibility" therefore argues that for example people under oppressive totalitarian regimes have [freedom of speech](free_speech.md) because their mouth is not physically sewed shut to prevent them from speaking, they can really say anything they want, they just have to accept they will be executed along with their whole family if they say something bad. Establishing responsibility therefore only means making external enslavement into internal enslavement.

 NOTE: One may ask how will [LRS](lrs.md) deal with the above? If we argue for true freedom, do we argue for feeling no responsibility even for things like murder etc.? The answer is basically this: to make people not do bad things don't remove their freedom to do bad things, keep their freedom to do anything while making them want to choose to do good things.

--- a/git.md
+++ b/git.md
@ -29,15 +29,17 @@ Here are some alternatives to git:

 TODO

- `git add files_you_changed; git commit -m "Update"; git push`
- `git pull`
- `git stash`
- `git rm file_to_remove`
- `git init`
- `git log`
- `git diff`
- `git apply diff_file`
- *weird error*: just look it up on stack overflow
+- `git clone repo_address`: Clones online repository to local directory.
+- `git add files_you_changed; git commit -m "Update"; git push`: This is how you make a commit, do this after every meaningful change (added feature, fixed bug, ...). Bonus points for writing meaningful messages.
+- `git pull`: Updates your local repository with the newest commits from the online repo that someone (for example you on another computer) made. This will fail if you have uncommitted changes because you would lose them: either commit your changes or destroy them with `git stash`.
+- `git stash`: Scratches all the uncommitted changes you currently have. Use if you were trying something that didn't work out for example.
+- `git rm file_to_remove`: Removes a file, works the same as normal `rm` but also informs git about this removal so that it will be part of the next commit.
+- `git init`: Initializes a new repository in current directory. After this just `git add` your initial files and commit them.
+- `git log`: Shows latest commits.
+- `git diff`: Shows [diff](diff.md) of your current uncommitted changes. Good for making [patches](patch.md) or checking what exactly you are committing.
+- `git apply diff_file`: Applies a [patch](patch.md) previously made with `git diff`.
+- *weird error*: Just look it up on stack overflow.
+- *fix fucked up repository*: Just `rm -rf` the whole directory and `git clone again`.

 ### Set Up Your Own Git Server

@ -73,4 +75,5 @@ IMPORTANT NOTE: for the HTTP clone to work you need to do `git update-server-inf

 - [GitHub](github.md)
 - [shithub](shithub.md)
- [git gud](git_gud.md)
+- [git gud](git_gud.md)
+- [version numbering](version_numbering.md)
--- a/just_werks.md
+++ b/just_werks.md
@ -21,3 +21,4 @@ The ignorant "just werks" philosophy completely ignores questions such as:

 - [everyone does it](everyone_does_it.md)
 - [just doing my job](just_doing_my_job.md)
+- [works on my machine](works_on_my_machine.md)
--- a/lgbt.md
+++ b/lgbt.md
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

 *This article is a part of series of articles on [fascism](fascism.md).*

-LGBT, LGBTQ+, LGBT卐, LGBTJKSLANKWQHHUXAWQIOSJBBNQ (lesbian, [gay](gay.md), [bisexual](bisexual.md), [transsexual](tranny.md), "[queer](queer.md)" and whatever is yet to be invented), also FGTS or TTTT (transsexual transsexual transsexual transsexual) is a toxic [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) [fascist](fascist.md) political group whose ideology is based on superiority of certain selected minority sexual orientations. They are a highly [violent](violence.md), [toxic](toxic.md), [bullying](bully.md) movement (not surprisingly centered in the [US](usa.md) but already spread around the whole world) practicing [censorship](censorship.md), Internet lynching ([cancel culture](cancel_culture.md)), discrimination, spread of extreme [propaganda](propaganda.md), harmful [lies](soyence.md), culture poison such as [political correctness](political_correctness.md) and other [evil](evil.md). LGBT uses a flag with all colors of puke.
+LGBT, LGBTQ+, LGBTQ卐, LGBTJKSLANKWQHHUXAWQIOSJBBNQ (lesbian, [gay](gay.md), [bisexual](bisexual.md), [transsexual](tranny.md), "[queer](queer.md)" and whatever is yet to be invented), also FGTS or TTTT (transsexual transsexual transsexual transsexual) is a toxic [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) [fascist](fascist.md) political group whose ideology is based on superiority of certain selected minority sexual orientations. They are a highly [violent](violence.md), [toxic](toxic.md), [bullying](bully.md) movement (not surprisingly centered in the [US](usa.md) but already spread around the whole world) practicing [censorship](censorship.md), Internet lynching ([cancel culture](cancel_culture.md)), discrimination, spread of extreme [propaganda](propaganda.md), harmful [lies](soyence.md), culture poison such as [political correctness](political_correctness.md) and other [evil](evil.md). LGBT uses a flag with all colors of puke.

 LGBT is related to the concept of equality in a similar way in which crusade wars were related to the nonviolent teaching of [Jesus](jesus.md), it shows how an idea can be completely twisted around and turned on its head as to be left completely contradicting its original premise.

--- a/often_confused.md
+++ b/often_confused.md
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Often Confused Terms

-There are many terms that are very similar and can many times be used interchangeably. This isn't wrong per se, a slight difference may be insignificant in certain contexts and the list here may also serve as a list of synonyms to those who already know the differences. However it's important to stress it's important to know at least some of the differences for the sake of the cases where they matter. The following list tries to document some of the often confused/similar terms.
+There exist many terms that are highly similar and can legitimately be used interchangeably in various contexts. This isn't wrong, a slight difference may be insignificant in ordinary conversation and so the list here may also serve as a list of synonyms, considering a synonym is defined as a word of SIMILAR meaning (it is very rare for two distinct words to have exactly the same meaning). However it's crucial to stress that we must at least be aware of the fact that the slight differences do exist, for the sake of the cases where they matter (such as technical specifications etc.). The list below attempts to document some of the often confused/similar terms. This is NOT a nitpicking list for people to go "ACKCHUALY" every time someone uses a slightly incorrect word, it's here to make us aware that in some special cases we should take a little extra time to think through which word to use to prevent misunderstanding.

 - **[1D](1d.md)** vs **[2D](2d.md)** vs **[2.5D](pseudo3d.md)** vs **[3D](3d.md)** (e.g. 2D function vs 3D function, 1D raycasting vs 2D raycasting, ...)
 - **[address](address.md)** vs **[pointer](pointer.md)** vs **[reference](reference.md)** vs **[index](index.md)** vs **[vector](vector.md)**
@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ There are many terms that are very similar and can many times be used interchang
 - **[argument](argument.md)** vs **[parameter](parameter.md)** vs **formal parameter**
 - **[array](array.md)** vs **[list](list.md)** vs **[vector](vector.md)** vs **[tuple](tuple.md)** vs **[string](string.md)** vs **[set](set.md)** vs **[class](class.md)** vs **[multiset](multiset.md)**
 - **[ASCII](ascii.md)** vs **[plain text](plain_text.md)** vs **[Unicode](unicode.md)** vs **[UTF](utf.md)** vs **[ANSI](ansi.md)**
- **[ASCII art](ascii_art.md)** vs **[ANSI art](ansi_art.md)** vs **[Unicode](unicode.md) art**
+- **[ASCII art](ascii_art.md)** vs **[ANSI art](ansi_art.md)** vs **[Unicode](unicode.md) art** vs **ASCII graphics** vs **[TUI](tui.md)**
 - **[asceticism](asceticism.md)** vs **[minimalism](minimalism.md)** vs **[frugality](frugality.md)** vs **poverty** vs **[pseudominimalism](pseudominimalism.md)** vs **[KISS](kiss.md)** vs **[lightweight](lightweight.md)** vs **[suckless](suckless.md)** vs **[Unix philosophy](unix_philosophy.md)** vs **[LRS](lrs.md)**
 - **[assembler](assembler.md)** vs **[assembly](assembly.md)** vs **[machine code](machine_code.md)**
 - **[astrology](astrology.md)** vs **[astronomy](astronomy.md)**
@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ There are many terms that are very similar and can many times be used interchang
 - **binary** vs **[executable](executable.md)**
 - **[binary](binary.md)** vs **[boolean](boolean.md)**
 - **[binary](binary.md)** vs **[digital](digital.md)** vs **[electronic](electronics.md)**
+- **bisexual** (normal) vs **[gay](gay.md)** (not normal)
 - **[black](black.md) [race](race.md)** vs **[nigger](nigger.md)** vs **[negro](negro.md)**
 - **[brainwashing](brainwashing.md)** vs **[education](education.md)** vs **[indoctrination](indoctrination.md)**
 - **[branchless](branchless.md) programming** vs **ifless programming**
@ -81,6 +82,7 @@ There are many terms that are very similar and can many times be used interchang
 - **[Euler's number](e.md)** vs **[Euler number](euler_number.md)**
 - **[evolutionary programming](evolutionary.md)** vs **[evolutionary algorithm](evolutionary.md)** vs **[genetic programming](genetic_programming.md)** vs **[genetic algorithm](genetic_algorithm.md)**
 - **[equality](equality.md)** vs **[identity](identity.md)** (in programming languages)
+- **[fail safe](fail_safe.md)** vs **safe** vs **[secure](security.md)** vs **robust** vs **reliable** vs **tested** etc.
 - **[floating point number](float.md)** vs **[real number](real_number.md)**
 - **[font](font.md)** vs **[typeface](typeface.md)**
 - **[forwarding](forwarding.md)** vs **[routing](routing.md)** vs **[switching](switching.md)**
@ -96,16 +98,19 @@ There are many terms that are very similar and can many times be used interchang
 - **[ID](id.md)** vs **[index](index.md)** vs **[token](token.md)** vs **[hash](hash.md)** vs **[handle](handle.md)** vs **[identifier](identifier.md)**
 - **[ideology](ideology.md)** vs **[philosophy](philosophy.md)** vs **[religion](religion.md)** vs **[paradigm](paradigm.md)**
 - **[imperative](imperative.md) paradigm** vs **procedural paradigm** vs **[procedural generation](procgen.md)**
+- **implementation defined behavior** vs **undefined behavior** vs **unspecified behavior**
 - **[infinite](infinity.md)** vs **[arbitrarily large/unbounded](unbounded.md)**
 - **[Internet](internet.md)** vs **[web](web.md)**
 - **[Java](java.md)** vs **[JavaScript](js.md)**
 - **[kB/mB/gB/tB](memory_units.md)** vs **[KiB/MiB/GiB/TiB](memory_units.md)**
- **[latency/ping/lag](latency.md)** vs **[throughput/bandwidth](throughput.md)**
+- **[latency/ping/lag](latency.md)** vs **[throughput/bandwidth](throughput.md)** vs **speed**
 - **[leftism](left_right.md)** vs **[pseudoleftism](pseudoleft.md)**
 - **[liberalism](liberalism.md)** vs **[libertarianism](libertarianism.md)**
 - **[license](license.md)** vs **[waiver](waiver.md)**
 - **main [memory](memory.md)** vs **working memory** vs **[RAM](ram.md)**
 - **[logic](logic.md)** vs **[math](math.md)**
+- **[low poly](low_poly.md)** vs **stylized** vs **[low effort](low_effort.md)**
+- **low [resolution](resolution.md)** vs **[pixel art](pixel_art.md)**
 - **[mass](mass.md)** vs **[weight](weight.md)**
 - **[method](method.md)** vs **[methodology](methodology.md)**
 - **[mod](mod.md)** vs **[mode](mode.md)**
--- a/palette.md
+++ b/palette.md
@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Palette

-In [computer graphics](graphics.md) palette is a set of possible [colors](color.md) that can be displayed, the term usually refers to a selected smaller subset of all colors that can in theory be displayed (large sets of colors tend to be called [color spaces](color_space.md) rather than palettes). Nowadays mainstream computers are powerful enough to work with over 6 million 24bit [RBG](rbg.md) colors (so called True Color) practically without limitations so the use of palettes is no longer such a huge thing, but with resource-limited machines, such as [embedded](embedded.md) devices and older computers, the use of palettes is sometimes necessary or at least offers many advantages (e.g. saving a lot of memory). Nevertheless palettes find uses even in "[modern](modern.md)" graphics, e.g. in the design of image formats that save space. Palettes are also greatly important in [pixel art](pixel_art.md) as an artistic choice.
+In [computer graphics](graphics.md) palette is a [set](set.md) of possible [colors](color.md) that can be displayed, the term usually refers to a selected smaller subset of all colors that can in theory be displayed (large sets of colors tend to be called [color spaces](color_space.md) rather than palettes). Nowadays mainstream computers are powerful enough to work with over 6 million 24bit [RBG](rbg.md) colors (so called True Color) practically without limitations so the use of palettes is no longer such a huge thing, but with resource-limited machines, such as [embedded](embedded.md) devices and older computers, the use of palettes is sometimes necessary or at least offers many advantages (e.g. saving a lot of memory). Nevertheless palettes find uses even in "[modern](modern.md)" graphics, e.g. in the design of image formats that save space. Palettes are also greatly important in [pixel art](pixel_art.md) as an artistic choice.

 Palettes usually contain a few to few thousand colors and the number is normally a power of 2, i.e. we see palettes with number of colors being 8, 16, 256, 2048, etc. -- this has advantages such as efficiency (fully utilizing color indices, keeping memory aligned etc.). Palettes can be general purpose or specialized (for example some image formats such as [GIF](gif.md) create a special palette for every individual image so as to best preserve its colors). Palettes can also be explicitly stored (the palette colors are stored somewhere in the memory) or implicit (the color can somehow be derived from its index, e.g. the [565](rgb565.md) palette).

--- a/random_page.md
+++ b/random_page.md
--- a/shortcut_thinking.md
+++ b/shortcut_thinking.md
@ -1,12 +1,12 @@
 # Shortcut Thinking

-Shortcut thinking means making conclusions by established associations (such as "theft = bad", "[fair](fair.md)" = "good") rather than making the extra effort of inferring actual conclusions based on new context such as different circumstances or newly discovered facts. This isn't bad in itself, in fact it is a great and necessary [optimization](optimization.md) of our thinking process, a kind of [cache](cache.md), and it's really why we have long term memory -- imagine we'd have to deduce all the facts from scratch each time we thought about anything. However shortcut thinking can be a weakness in many situations and leaves people prone to manipulation by [propaganda](propaganda.md) which twists meanings of words (such as "open mind", ["rationality"](pseudoskepticism.md), "[progress](progress.md)", ["theft"](intellectual_property.md), ["science"](soyence.md) etc.), relying on people accepting the unacceptable by having them bypass the thinking process with the mental shortcut. As such this phenomenon is extremely abused by politicians, i.e. they for example try to shift the meaning of a certain negative word to include something they want to get rid of, to have it rejected just based on its name.
+Shortcut thinking means making conclusions by established associations (such as "theft = bad", "[fair](fair.md) = good") rather than making the extra effort of inferring actual conclusions based on new context such as different circumstances or newly discovered facts. This isn't bad in itself, in fact it is a great and necessary [optimization](optimization.md) of our thinking process, a kind of [cache](cache.md), and it's really why we have long term memory -- imagine we'd have to deduce all the facts from scratch each time we thought about anything. However shortcut thinking can be a weakness in many situations and leaves people prone to manipulation by [propaganda](propaganda.md) which twists meanings of words (such as "open mind", ["rationality"](pseudoskepticism.md), "[progress](progress.md)", ["theft"](intellectual_property.md), ["science"](soyence.md) etc.), relying on people accepting the unacceptable by having them bypass the thinking process with the mental shortcut. As such this phenomenon is extremely abused by politicians, i.e. they for example try to shift the meaning of a certain negative word to include something they want to get rid of, to have it rejected just based on its name.

 Some commonly held associations appearing in shortcut thinking of common people nowadays are for example "[update](update_culture.md) = good", "[modern](modern.md) = good", "[democracy](democracy.md) = good", "[piracy](piracy.md) = theft = bad", "laziness = bad", "[fairness](fair.md) = good", "pedophiles = child rapists = bad", "[competition](competition.md) = [progress](progress.md) = good", "more [jobs](work.md) = good", "more [complex technology](capitalist_software.md) = better", "open mind = blindly trusting those officially declared smarter than myself = good" etc. Of those most are of course either extremely simplified or just plain wrong. however some association may still of course be correct, such as "murder = bad", which is an association that e.g. [military](military.md) tries to get rid of by calling the acts of murder they commit something else, e.g. "defense", "[justice](justice.md)" etc.

 Let's focus on the specific **example** of the association "fair = good" -- when we hear something is *fair*, we automatically give it a positive meaning, we see it as good. It is so because our society is, and mostly has been, based on [competition](competition.md) and in that fairness is key so as to ensure that the stronger wins and weaker loses, i.e. fairness is an attribute that any competitive system needs in order to work correctly. However when we start to aim to remove competitive society and replace it with [altruistic one](less_retarded_society.md) -- a society in which one doesn't have to prove his worth or be slave in order to deserve the right to live -- fairness becomes a BAD attribute. If we want the same well being for everyone, fairness is bad because it goes against this goal, it gives more to some (the stronger) than to other (the weaker).

-Another example is e.g. the association "theft = bad". Indeed it has some sense in it -- if we turn shortcut thinking off, we may analyze why this association exists. For most of our history the word theft has meant *taking a physical personal possession of someone else against his will*. Indeed, in a society of people of which most weren't rich, this was bad in most cases as it hurt the robbed man, he has lost something he probably needed. However the society evolved, the meaning of property itself has changed from "personal property" to "private property", i.e. suddenly there were people who could own a whole forest or a factory even if they have never seen it, and there were people who had much more than they needed. If a poor starving man steals food from the rich to his family and the rich doesn't even notice this, suddenly the situation is different and many will say this is no longer bad. Nevertheless the word theft stayed in use and now included even such cases that were ethical because of the shifted meaning of the word "property" and due to changes in conditions of people. Recently the word property was shifted to the extreme with the invention of **[intellectual property](intellectual_property.md)**, i.e. the concept of being able to own information such as ideas or stories in books. Intellectual property is fundamentally different from physical property as it can't be stolen in the same way, it can only be copied, duplicated, but this copying doesn't rid the "owner" of the original information. Indeed it may prevent the author from making a lot of money under [capitalism](capitalism.md), but that's only thanks to the artificially established system inventing ways of bullying recipients of information into paying money, the system was deliberately made so as to make non harmful things into harmful ones to fuel "[competition](competition.md)" and the situation is no longer as simple as with physical property/stealing, it's actually the underlying system that's wrong here, not actions that aren't aligned with the harmful system. And so nowadays the word "theft", or one of its modern forms, "[piracy](piracy.md)", includes also mere copying of information or even just reusing an idea ([patent](patent.md)) for completely good purposes, for example writing computer programs in certain (patented) ways is considered a theft, even if doing so is done purely to help other people at large. Those arguing that illegal downloads or reuses prevent the "owner's" profit must know that again society is completely different nowadays and this so called "theft" actually doesn't hurt anyone but some gigantic billion dollar corporation that doesn't even notice if loses one or two million dollars, no actual human gets hurt, only a legal entity, and these so called "thefts" actually give rise to good, helpful things by at least a little more balance to society, hurting a virtual, non-living entity to help millions of actual living people. In fact, hurting a corporation, by definition a [fascist](fascism.md) entity hostile to people, may yet further be seen as a good thing in itself, so stealing from corporation is also good by this view. The illusion of profit theft here is arbitrarily made, the "theft" exists only because we've purposefully created a system which allows selling copies of information and restricting ideas and therefore enables this "theft", i.e. this is no longer a natural thing that would exist without something "preventing it", it's something miles away from the original meaning of the word "theft". With all this in mind we may, in today's context of the new meaning of old words, reconsider theft to no longer be generally bad.
+Another example is e.g. the association "theft = bad". Indeed it has some sense in it -- if we turn shortcut thinking off, we may analyze why this association exists. For most of our [history](history.md) the word theft has meant *taking a physical personal possession of someone else against his will*. Indeed, in a society of people of which most weren't rich, this was bad in most cases as it hurt the robbed man, he has lost something he probably needed. However the society evolved, the meaning of property itself has changed from "personal property" to "private property", i.e. suddenly there were people who could own a whole forest or a factory even if they have never seen it, and there were people who had much more than they needed. If a poor starving man steals food from the rich to feed his family and the rich doesn't even notice this, suddenly the situation is different and many will say this is no longer bad. Nevertheless the word theft stayed in use and now included even such cases that were ethical because of the shifted meaning of the word "property" and due to changes in conditions of people. Recently the word property was shifted to the extreme with the invention of **[intellectual property](intellectual_property.md)**, i.e. the concept of being able to own information such as ideas or stories in books. Intellectual property is fundamentally different from physical property as it can't be stolen in the same way, it can only be copied, duplicated, but this copying doesn't rid the "owner" of the original information. Indeed it may prevent the author from making a lot of money under [capitalism](capitalism.md), but that's only thanks to the artificially established system inventing ways of bullying recipients of information into paying money, the system was deliberately made so as to make non harmful things into harmful ones to fuel "[competition](competition.md)" and the situation is no longer as simple as with physical property/stealing, it's actually the underlying system that's wrong here, not actions that aren't aligned with the harmful system. And so nowadays the word "theft", or one of its modern forms, "[piracy](piracy.md)", includes also mere copying of information or even just reusing an idea ([patent](patent.md)) for completely good purposes, for example writing computer programs in certain (patented) ways is considered a theft, even if doing so is done purely to help other people at large. Those arguing that illegal downloads or reuses prevent the "owner's" profit must know that again society is completely different nowadays and this so called "theft" actually doesn't hurt anyone but some gigantic billion dollar corporation that doesn't even notice if it loses one or two million dollars, no actual human gets hurt, only a legal entity, and these so called "thefts" actually give rise to good, helpful things by at least a little more balance to society, hurting a virtual, non-living entity to help millions of actual living people. In fact, hurting a corporation, by definition a [fascist](fascism.md) entity hostile to people, may yet further be seen as a good thing in itself, so stealing from corporation is also good by this view. The illusion of profit theft here is arbitrarily made, the "theft" exists only because we've purposefully created a system which allows selling copies of information and restricting ideas and therefore enables this "theft", i.e. this is no longer a natural thing that would exist without something "preventing it", it's something miles away from the original meaning of the word "theft". With all this in mind we may, in today's context of the new meaning of old words, reconsider theft to no longer be generally bad.

 When confronted with a new view, political theory etc., we should try to turn shortcut thinking off; we should also do this every time someone tries to have us make a decision under a competitive system such as [capitalism](capitalism.md) as that someone is most likely trying to manipulate us. Doing this can be called **being open minded**, i.e. opening one's mind to reinterpretation of very basic, possibly strongly rooted concepts by a new view, however be careful as the meaning of the term "open mind" is often twisted too. Also we should probably update our association from time to time just to keep them up with the new state of the world, only by sitting down and thinking about the world and discussing it with the right people.

--- a/soyence.md
+++ b/soyence.md
@ -31,21 +31,24 @@ Some further examples of soyence:

 - Relying on **consensus**: This is one of the great identifying features of soyence -- what is true or not depends on whether the majority of (approved) soyentists agree it is true. When we think about it for just one second, 
 we cannot miss the fact that this way of establishing truth has simply no longer anything to do with science: we no longer establish facts based on rigorous, logical conclusions, but based on VOTING, by accepting the OPINION of majority. This is POLITICS and nothing else. Common people accept this for one simple reasons: the words *consensus* and *[democracy](democracy.md)* [sound positive](shortcut_thinking.md) and 99% of common people NEVER think things through, they literally only react to whether a word sounds good or not, they never think deeper to check actual consequences. The opposing 1% -- usually true scientists, i.e. people who DO think things through -- are simply bullied out based on the consensus rule: "majority of people like this, so shut up". Everyone who knows anything about history of science knows many, if not most of the greatest advancements of science were those that went AGAINST consensus, including those of Galileo and Darwin for example -- big breakthroughs are so significant exactly because they show something assumed to have been true is in fact false -- and this is what soyence suppresses by strictly rejecting anything that goes against consensus. If science was conducted by maintaining consensus, we would have no theory of relativity, we'd still keep believing in aether, we'd be teaching children that Sun revolved around Earth, which is flat and only 6000 years old by the way, we wouldn't believe in rational numbers and in fact wouldn't even have the heretic number [zero](zero.md).
- [gender studies](gender_studies.md) [LMAO](lmao.md)
- "Believe in science!" The irony of such sentences is so striking it shouldn't need any further comments, but just in case: science should be the exact opposite of believing.
- "[Race](race.md) is a SOCIAL CONSTRUCT and doesn't have any biological meaning."
- any [pseudoskeptical](pseudoskepticism.md) shit trying to look "scientific"
- Bullshit degrees, e.g. someone getting [PhD](phd.md) in "user experience", "level design", "diversity in software engineering" or "making youtube videos" (like that fucker from Veritasium [lmao](lmao.md)).
+- **Hostility towards [religion](religion.md)**, seeing religion as incompatible with science and as its [COMPETITION](competition.md). Perceiving religion as a competitor to "science" reveals that such "science" IS in fact a new religion that wants to occupy the spot previously occupied by religion. True science is distinct and complementary to religion and in fact most of the greatest scientists (Newton, Tesla, Pythagoras, Einstein, ...) were religious or at least had faith in something supernatural. True science deals with the rational, provable and knowable while true religion deals with the supernatural, that which must be felts and is improvable. Both are part of EVERY human's life.
+- **[gender studies](gender_studies.md)** [LMAO](lmao.md)
+- "Believe in science!" The irony of sentences like this one should be so striking to not need further comments, but still: science should be the exact opposite of believing.
+- "[Race](race.md) is a SOCIAL CONSTRUCT and doesn't have any biological meaning." (proven by consensus)
+- Any [pseudoskeptical](pseudoskepticism.md) talk trying to look "scientific", for example using jargon, [buzzwords](buzzword.md) and large thesaurus to make opinions sound "scientific".
+- [Bullshit](bullshit.md) degrees, e.g. "[PhD](phd.md)" in "user experience", "ecology communication", "game level design", "diversity in software engineering" or "making [youtube](youtube.md) videos" (like that fucker from Veritasium [lmao](lmao.md)). This creates an army of relatively stupid (110 [IQ](iq.md)) conformists who are extremely [proud](pride.md) and grateful for the prestige of having become the "[soldiers](fight_culture.md) of science" and will be ready to in turn support the political consensus which will subsequently be used to cancel the true scientific minority.
 - "[Women](woman.md) are as intelligent as men, if not more."
 - "[citation needed](citation_needed.md)" on everything
- "Science popularization" as in building authority of so called "scientists" so as to create a political capital.
- "This extremely lucrative [Covid](covid.md) vaccine made by us in record time is absolutely safe, don't dare question it, just take it 5 times a year and pay us each time you do, don't mind any side effects." --Big Pharma
- Fanboy mentality over ideas people, theories etc.
+- "Studies shows ..."
+- "Science popularization" (more correctly soyence brainwashing) as in building authority of so called "scientists" so as to create a political capital.
+- "This extremely lucrative [Covid](covid.md) vaccine made by us, a predatory [corporation](corporation.md), in record time is absolutely safe, don't dare question it OR ELSE, just take it 5 times a year and pay us each time you do, don't mind any side effects." --Big Pharma
+- Fandom community over "science", fanboy mentality, treating scientists as celebrities, wearing "science" T-shirts and hats, watching [Big Bang Theory](big_bang_theory.md), following "I Fucking Love Science" on [Facebook](facebook.md), "rooting for science!", hostility towards anyone who doesn't support the same team.
 - "You can't trust your everyday experience or things you see with your own eyes, only trust our SCIENTISTS, they know better."
 - "Science says [god](god.md) doesn't exist." aka reddit [atheism](atheism.md)
- "We can't believe this because it wasn't peer censored/fact checked and/or it didn't pass the [null ritual](null_ritual.md) and/or it wasn't published in a journal on our approved literature list." (--[Wikipedia](wikipedia.md))
+- **Peer review** (better known as peer censorship): "We can't believe this because it wasn't peer censored/fact checked and/or it didn't pass the [null ritual](null_ritual.md) and/or it wasn't published in a journal on our approved literature list." (--[Wikipedia](wikipedia.md))
 - "This gender studies expert has proven sex is a racial construct and has no biological meaning. You disagree? Well, do you have a PhD in gender studies? No? Then shut up you fucking sexist."
- Obsession with "novelty" and similar [buzzwords](buzzword.md) ([modern](modern.md), innovative, sustainable, green, ...). Papers have to be [advertised](marketing.md) well to gain attention, like videos on YouTube.
+- Obsession with "novelty" and similar [buzzwords](buzzword.md) ([modern](modern.md), innovative, sustainable, green, state of the art, bleeding edge, ...). Papers have to be [advertised](marketing.md) well to gain attention, e.g. with videos on YouTube.
+- "Scientists" who actually make money on YouTube and Twitter and do "science" only as a side pet project to have some "content" for their online Disneyland.
 - "This goes against SCIENTIFIC CONSENSUS therefore it's pseudoscience and [conspiracy theory](conspiracy_theory.md)."
 - "This research is racist.", using terms such as "scientific racism".
 - Bullshit "fields" like "ecology communication" and whatnot.
@ -54,27 +57,28 @@ we cannot miss the fact that this way of establishing truth has simply no longer
 - Strategically setting up experiments and/or cherrypicking facts (as well as censoring inconvenient counter evidence) so as to achieve desired results :]]]
 - "This research was made by a [racist](racism.md) so it is invalid, also we should [lynch](cancel_culture.md) the guy just in case."
 - Neil de grass/Morgan Freeman "documentaries", emotional "science" documentaries with famous actors and a lot of "PhD" women talking heads that make wild gesticulations and excited faces trying to tell you how EXCITING science is by suggesting there must be alien life because there are so many planets or by showing you black holes, explosive chemical reactions etc.
- Political messages and "stories" inserted into "scientific documentaries".
+- Political messages and "motivational stories" inserted into "scientific documentaries".
 - Deducing cool facts on TV about extinct animals from their skull shapes is Neil De grass stamp of approval legit thumbs up paleonthology science yay! :)))) But trying it on humans ([phrenology](phrenology.md)) is a bad bad NONO PSEUDOSCIENCE, neil de grass frown :(((
- "We can totally trust the results of commercial research. They will be objective and sincerely publish even results that will ruin their business because even CEOs are moral people and wouldn't dare lie even if that should cost them their career."
+- "We can totally trust the results of commercial research. They will be objective and sincerely publish even results that will ruin their business because even CEOs are moral people and wouldn't dare lie even if that should cost them their career. Even if a corporation wanted to do something bad there are still the excellent good people in government who won't let this happen."
 - "These negative results are useful but unexciting so let's not publish them, we gotta entertain our readers to stay on the market. We GOTTA TELL INSPIRATIONAL STORIES with our papers. We have to publish exciting papers about which we can also make YouTube videos for our channel." --soyence journals
 - "No, you can't research the details of historic events such as Holocaust. It is declared to have happened like this and if you suggest otherwise, you go to prison." (see anti [Holocaust](holocaust.md) denial laws)
 - great part of [economics](economics.md)
 - Ignoring and/or censoring results of unethical or controversial research, for example the cruel experiment performed by [Nazis](nazi.md), i.e. mixing in political decisions.
- "Absence of evidence is evidence of absence", but only when it's convenient for them -- for example "humans are of recent origin because there is no evidence of older humans existing" (so as to support their claims about human race) or "God doesn't exist because we have no evidence for it", but when asked about whether life exists anywhere besides Earth they will go "YES YES YES" (because that supports science hype). { Stole this observation from Luke Smith's podcast. ~drummyfish }
+- "Absence of evidence is evidence of absence", but only when it's convenient for them -- for example "humans are of recent origin because there is no evidence of older humans existing" (so as to support their claims about human [race](race.md)) or "God doesn't exist because we have no evidence for it", but when asked about whether life exists anywhere besides Earth they will go "YES YES YES" (because that supports science hype). { Stole this observation from Luke Smith's podcast. ~drummyfish }
 - Obsession about words rather than ideas and concepts, e.g. what is a "disorder" and "illness" vs "divergent", emotional arguments about whether Pluto is a "planet" or not etc.
- "Feeling sexually attracted to 17.99 years old chick is a serious mental illness, please consider lobotomy and castration. 18.00 is OK."
+- "Feeling sexually attracted to 17.99 years old chick is a serious mental illness, please consider lobotomy and castration. 18.00 is OK. QED"
 - Number of rapes has escalated by 1000%! (Because we redefined rape to include any interaction of man and woman.)
- "[pedophilia](pedophilia.md) is a mental illness while pure [homosexuality](gay.md) is not"
+- "[Pedophilia](pedophilia.md) is a mental illness while pure [homosexuality](gay.md) is not. QED"
 - ...

 Here are a few tips on how to spot soyence:

 - Is trust involved? Things like authority of publishers, censorship, reviews etc.? If so, it is by definition NOT science.
- Is questioning anything at all prevented and/or punished? It is [dogma](dogma.md), not science. True science encourages questioning EVERYTHING.
+- Is questioning anything at all prevented and/or punished? It is [dogma](dogma.md), not science. True science encourages questioning EVERYTHING. Once it can't be questioned, it can't be refuted and this BY DEFINITION kills the scientific method on the spot.
 - Is emotion involved? Is someone putting energy into promoting it? Are they waving their hands in air and making content creator faces when explaining something to convince you by excitement rather than by pure logical arguments? If yes, it's probably a preparation of business/politics grounds, not science.
 - Is money involved? Is any form of [capital](capital.md) (money, attention, power, ...) in play? Is there any form of business connected? If so, it is business, not science.
 - Is politics involved? Will the results help some currently active political group? It's highly suspicious, it almost definitely can't be trusted, it's most likely not science.
+- Is the mainstream spending resources on promoting it? It's soyence almost with 100% certainty soyence.
 - ...

 ## See Also
--- a/suicide.md
+++ b/suicide.md
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ For SCIENCE RESEARCHERS: there is a text file describing suicide methods at http

 There are also many activists promoting euthanasia for people to whom medicine can no longer help live without suffering, they call it "[right](rights_culture.md) to die". They even (controversially) provide info on how to best perform safe suicide if legal euthanasia isn't available.

-For SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS: these are some highly scientifically researched methods of suicide for creating bleeding edge (no pun intended) scientifically peer reviewed scientific papers for scientifically PREVENTING suicides ([LMAO](lmao.md)): { Again, please don't kill yourself if you don't have to :-) <3 ~drummyfish }
+For SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHERS: these are some highly scientifically researched methods of suicide for creating bleeding edge (pun intended) scientifically peer reviewed scientific papers for scientifically PREVENTING suicides ([LMAO](lmao.md)): { Again, please don't kill yourself if you don't have to :-) <3 ~drummyfish }

 - **legal [euthanasia](euthanasia.md)** = best if available. This is just a no brainer: if one has the option to leave peacefully under the assistance of a medical professional, why choose anything else?
 - **wrist cutting** (and heart stabbing etc.) = attention whoring, very low chance of success. It is known that cutting one's wrists rarely leads to death, it's almost impossible to cut very deep even if you want to, the body is just programmed to not let itself do it and especially feminine [zoomers](zoomer.md) nowadays don't have any balls to do it, one will just create a bloody mess. Self stabbing oneself to death is seen sometimes but many times it's under the influence of drugs or extremely serious mental illness which just turns off all self preservation instincts. To bleed out it's not enough to cut a vein, one must hit the artery. The correct way to cut a wrist is in the direction ALONG the wrist, NOT in perpendicular direction -- the cuts must be extremely deep to be dangerous, however the best way is to target the artery on the neck or in groin. People often do it in hot bath as that increases blood flow and is also kind of less messy and possibly more comfortable (if that can even be said about the moment in which one is dying). Using ordinary knife won't work, it's never sharp enough, one has to use razor, but a small razor is hard to manipulate, so razor knife is ideal. Even so actually dying from cutting/stabbing oneself is very rare -- one paper gave a success rate of 4%.
--- a/trolling.md
+++ b/trolling.md
@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Here are some potentially entertaining ways of trolling (they'll be written from
 - **Stream/game raids** became very popular with the onset of streaming and child abusing MMOs, maybe the most iconic was the Habbo Hotel "Pool's closed" raid. [4chan](4chan.md) is one of such raid enjoyers, however very specialized groups such as soyjak.party emerged who live off almost exclusively of organizing such raids. A stream raid mostly goes like this: some toxic tranny prostitute is making children masturbate on Twitch and figures out it will steal more attention (money) by forcing audience interaction in form of some gayme in which the audience can participate -- this is where the fun begins. There are shitty games that for example let people write rap songs that are then read by text to speech synthesizer or choose titles for albums or the marble racing game where users can set their avatar pictures etc. Of course here comes the party that just storms this with images of goatse or some [nigger](nigger.md) quotes, the streamer starts to rage because he is now showing an image of protruding hairy asshole to 10000 toddlers who just wanted to watch overwatch or roblox, while in a robotic voice in the background is quoting Hitler and calling for the final solution, which of course is not very good for the streamer's career :D In best scenarios the streamer gets banned. { See for example these video clip gems at https://soyjakwiki.net/Jackbox_Raiding#Clips :D ~drummyfish }
 - **Classic trollz** revolve around creating [drama](drama.md) on forums -- this is kind of an [art](art.md) as you have to keep the right balance of seriousness and stupidity; too much of the former and you're not trolling anyone, too much of the latter and you're just spotted as obvious troll. It's definitely not about logging on a starting to drop the [N-words](nigger.md) and insulting everyone, that's just an instant ban that ends the fun; you rather want to start slow, get many people seriously involved in the discussion, be polite and then slightly steer the talk towards something controversial (nice if you pretend to be part of some "oppressed minority"). Then you just make it look like you're just an uneducated simple minded individual who kind of happens to lean towards an opinion the others truly hate, but you have to keep their hope that they can convince you to change your opinion, so still try to be polite, just so you keep arguing with them and wasting more and more of their time until they start losing their shit and the thread explodes into [hitler](hitler.md) arguments etc., then just watch and enjoy.
 - **Having fun with the surveillance**: Our [modern](modern.md), bleeding edge technology combined with ultra modern [capitalism](capitalism.md) achieved the amount of [surveillance](surveillance.md) that cavemen could only dream of -- today we can enjoy being watched 24/7 everywhere and feel the warmth of sharing our private correspondence with some kind stranger so that we don't feel so alone. We can thank these good people and censors by hiding nice surprises in our correspondence just for their pleasure. The downside here is that we won't see his reaction, but just knowing about it can warm one's heart. For example when I'm sending something to another continent I know all packages come through border control to achieve great degree of PROTECTION^TM, those people just have to go looking through the things you're sending and spend lengthy days asking themselves questions such as "Why would he be sending this kind of item? Could it be suspicious that a 20 year old man is sending a dildo to a 60 year old woman? We have to think about this deeper to find reasons behind this." I know these people must be bored checking the same kind of items every day over and over, so I make unique, creative challenges for them. For example I create something that looks like drugs: I make a suspicious looking box with removable bottom and in there I put plastic bags with sugar, but that's not all of course -- this will just raise the possibility of them having to CAREFULLY check all the items I am sending, and that's where I hide all the surprises. I print out images such as goatse and photos of suicided children (in high resolution) and create a small novel sized book out of it captioned: top secret [steganography](steganography.md) information, knowing someone will have to go through it all and analyze every single picture to see if there is some kind of hidden list of drug business partners or something; then I add some weird machine, a bunch of randomly assembled gears and microchips and puzzle toys, that will make some highly paid engineer busy for several months, it'll make him scratch his head and try to figure out what the device is for (spoiler: it does nothing) -- sometimes for the border control you have to list all the items contained in the boxes, capitalists just assume that every item in the universe can be classified by their shitty tax categories, so I just create these weird unclassifiable things and invent names for them like "quazi orthosplitter gene rotator" or something (using random word generator on the Internet). A cheaper version of this act of kindness can be performed by embedding "interesting" links into one's unencrypted emails that contain "interesting" keywords such as "BOMB", "ALLAH" etc. For example I may drop in some gay porn so that the surveillance worker can literally watch porn on his shift: this will make him very happy.
-**Satellite image vandalization**: In this [modern](modern.md) age we now have easily accessible to everyone satellite images of whole [Earth](earth.md) surface in fine resolution, isn't that awesome? I like to use this fact for the lulz. I set for a desolate place far away from civilization where no one ever walks, and there I create funny pictures and texts from logs and rocks that will be recognizable in satellite images. Even if Google spots them and applies its masterful art of censorship, there are still many other competing services and photo sets where it will be overlooked and my creations will plague the Internet for a very long time -- and as one of my creations is being censored and destroyed, I am already working on another one somewhere else. It's a relaxing activity in the wilderness and a great motivation to go outside, spend some time alone in beautiful nature. Similar effects can be achieved by planting trees (you can even mask this behind ecology activism) or even building houses in funny shapes, but obviously I'll have to wait very long to see the results here. If my artwork is big enough, people don't even notice it when walking by, it will only be visible from above. Now there are of course simple funny [words](nigger.md) that immediately come to mind that one can spam this way, but we mustn't limit our creativity so easily: we have a publicly accessible canvas onto which we can ANONYMOUSLY paint WHATEVER we want. Someone needs to be [doxxed](dox.md)? Revealed as [gay](gay.md)? Illegal information wants to be shared? What's a better place than this? Best of all if anyone gets in trouble for this, it may be the creator of the satellite image.
+- **Satellite image vandalization**: In this [modern](modern.md) age we now have easily accessible to everyone satellite images of whole [Earth](earth.md) surface in fine resolution, isn't that awesome? I like to use this fact for the lulz. I set for a desolate place far away from civilization where no one ever walks, and there I create funny pictures and texts from logs and rocks that will be recognizable in satellite images. Even if Google spots them and applies its masterful art of censorship, there are still many other competing services and photo sets where it will be overlooked and my creations will plague the Internet for a very long time -- and as one of my creations is being censored and destroyed, I am already working on another one somewhere else. It's a relaxing activity in the wilderness and a great motivation to go outside, spend some time alone in beautiful nature. Similar effects can be achieved by planting trees (you can even mask this behind ecology activism) or even building houses in funny shapes, but obviously I'll have to wait very long to see the results here. If my artwork is big enough, people don't even notice it when walking by, it will only be visible from above. Now there are of course simple funny [words](nigger.md) that immediately come to mind that one can spam this way, but we mustn't limit our creativity so easily: we have a publicly accessible canvas onto which we can ANONYMOUSLY paint WHATEVER we want. Someone needs to be [doxxed](dox.md)? Revealed as [gay](gay.md)? Illegal information wants to be shared? What's a better place than this? Best of all if anyone gets in trouble for this, it may be the creator of the satellite image.
 - **Weird life goal troll**: This one requires extreme dedication and is a bit risky, but it might be one of the highest trolling peaks if performed successfully and well. So what's the troll here? We know that life goal cannot be objectively set, you can make your life goal whatever you want and no one can ever objectively refute it. So you can for example set your life goal to just walk forward -- you will dedicate everything to only walking forward as much as you can. You will stop going to work, you will only eat and drink if absolutely necessary, you'll just get up from the bed one day and start walking over the country in your pajamas -- if people ask you if you're alright you just say "yes, thank you". If you are starving, you just grab nearest food and eat it, if you need to sleep, you just lie down somewhere and sleep and then just walk again. Soon you'll probably be taken to mental asylum -- there you have to just prove you're completely normal, convince them you know what you're doing, that you're not feeling any anxiety or depression, that you hear no voices, you have only set walking as your life goal -- there is no objective way to refute this life goal. You will probably end up in asylum or jail anyway sooner or later, then just try to maximize walking, be nice and lie if you have to. If they lead you to the court, just turn around and start walking out of the building. If they put you in chains, just behave nicely and say you won't try to run away -- if they take the chains down, just start walking away. Whenever you get out of jail, just start walking again and so on. Now there is a risk that you may just waste your life without attracting any attention, but you may also become famous and then highlight the fact that current society is extremely retarded and is not ready for people who aren't conforming and just set their life goal arbitrarily.
 - Prank calls to businesses can be cool, a traditional troll is for example calling two restaurants and letting them talk to each other :D This can fuck up two businesses at the same time, so it's even good for society, and the women behind the phone will be happy because it brings a little fun to their otherwise boring and repetitive slavery.
 - ...
--- a/wiki_pages.md
+++ b/wiki_pages.md
--- a/wiki_stats.md
+++ b/wiki_stats.md
@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
 This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.

 - number of articles: 612
- number of commits: 942
- total size of all texts in bytes: 4797105
- total number of lines of article texts: 35342
+- number of commits: 943
+- total size of all texts in bytes: 4803185
+- total number of lines of article texts: 35358
 - number of script lines: 294
 - occurrences of the word "person": 9
 - occurrences of the word "nigger": 103
@ -25,8 +25,8 @@ longest articles:
 - [programming_language](programming_language.md): 44K
 - [woman](woman.md): 44K
 - [3d_model](3d_model.md): 44K
- [main](main.md): 40K
 - [internet](internet.md): 40K
+- [main](main.md): 40K
 - [bloat](bloat.md): 36K
 - [cheating](cheating.md): 36K
 - [raycasting](raycasting.md): 36K
@ -35,49 +35,49 @@ longest articles:

 top 50 5+ letter words:

- which (2639)
- there (2078)
- people (1968)
- example (1625)
- other (1506)
- about (1320)
- number (1287)
+- which (2642)
+- there (2080)
+- people (1973)
+- example (1629)
+- other (1509)
+- about (1324)
+- number (1288)
 - software (1228)
- because (1046)
- their (1025)
+- because (1048)
+- their (1026)
 - program (1020)
- would (979)
- something (955)
- being (950)
- things (918)
+- would (996)
+- something (956)
+- being (951)
+- things (920)
 - language (915)
 - called (890)
- simple (820)
- computer (816)
- numbers (812)
+- simple (821)
+- computer (817)
+- numbers (813)
 - without (806)
 - however (758)
- different (755)
+- different (756)
 - programming (751)
 - these (742)
 - function (741)
 - world (723)
 - system (696)
 - doesn (677)
- should (672)
- still (663)
+- should (673)
+- still (664)
 - games (656)
 - while (648)
 - point (632)
- drummyfish (630)
- society (626)
- simply (618)
- possible (607)
+- drummyfish (631)
+- society (630)
+- simply (620)
+- possible (608)
 - using (598)
 - probably (586)
- always (572)
+- always (574)
 - course (569)
- though (566)
+- though (567)
 - https (565)
 - similar (564)
 - basically (554)
@ -89,6 +89,20 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
 latest changes:

 ```
+Date:   Fri Dec 13 20:40:56 2024 +0100
+  90s.md
+  freedom.md
+  hitler.md
+  internet.md
+  logic_gate.md
+  lrs_dictionary.md
+  progress.md
+  random_page.md
+  shortcut_thinking.md
+  soyence.md
+  technology.md
+  wiki_pages.md
+  wiki_stats.md
 Date:   Thu Dec 12 21:58:18 2024 +0100
  adam_smith.md
  binary.md
@ -113,17 +127,6 @@ Date:   Thu Dec 12 21:58:18 2024 +0100
  wiki_stats.md
  work.md
  youtube.md
-Date:   Wed Dec 11 17:27:52 2024 +0100
-  and.md
-  logic_gate.md
-  open_console.md
-  or.md
-  random_page.md
-  wiki_pages.md
-  wiki_stats.md
-  work.md
-  xor.md
-Date:   Tue Dec 10 20:41:11 2024 +0100
 ```

 most wanted pages:
@ -152,18 +155,18 @@ most wanted pages:
 most popular and lonely pages:

 - [lrs](lrs.md) (323) 
- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (280) 
+- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (281) 
 - [c](c.md) (233) 
- [bloat](bloat.md) (225) 
+- [bloat](bloat.md) (226) 
 - [free_software](free_software.md) (194) 
 - [game](game.md) (147) 
 - [suckless](suckless.md) (145) 
 - [proprietary](proprietary.md) (132) 
- [minimalism](minimalism.md) (112) 
- [censorship](censorship.md) (111) 
- [modern](modern.md) (110) 
+- [minimalism](minimalism.md) (113) 
+- [censorship](censorship.md) (112) 
+- [modern](modern.md) (111) 
 - [computer](computer.md) (107) 
- [kiss](kiss.md) (105) 
+- [kiss](kiss.md) (106) 
 - [fun](fun.md) (104) 
 - [programming](programming.md) (101) 
 - [math](math.md) (100) 
@ -174,8 +177,8 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
 - [bullshit](bullshit.md) (91) 
 - [woman](woman.md) (90) 
 - [hacking](hacking.md) (90) 
+- [less_retarded_society](less_retarded_society.md) (86) 
 - [corporation](corporation.md) (86) 
- [less_retarded_society](less_retarded_society.md) (85) 
 - [free_culture](free_culture.md) (85) 
 - [art](art.md) (84) 
 - [public_domain](public_domain.md) (83) 
--- a/work.md
+++ b/work.md
@ -2,7 +2,7 @@

 *Work is a glorification of [slavery](slavery.md).*

-Work, better known as slavery, is an unpleasant effort that one is required to suffer, such as harvesting crops or [debugging](debugging.md) computer programs. Work hurts living beings and takes away the meaning of their lives, it destroys their bodies and minds. Work makes us slaves, it wastes our lives and is a cause of a large number of [suicides](suicide.md) -- many consider it better to die than to work. One of the main goals of civilization is to eliminate any need for work, i.e. create machines that will do all the work for humans (see [automation](automation.md)).
+Work, better known as slavery, is an unpleasant effort that one is required to suffer, such as harvesting crops or [debugging](debugging.md) [computer](computer.md) programs. Work hurts living beings and takes away the meaning of their lives, it destroys their bodies and minds. Work makes us slaves, it wastes our lives and is a cause of a large number of [suicides](suicide.md) -- many consider it better to die than to work. One of the main goals of civilization is to eliminate any need for work, i.e. create machines that will do all the work for humans (see [automation](automation.md)). Work is for the machine, life and [art](art.md) are for the living being.

 **[Fun](fun.md) fact**: the Spanish (also Portuguese etc.) word for work, "trabajo", comes from *tripalium*, a device made of three sticks used to force slaves to work. { Thanks to my friend who told me about this <3 ~drummyfish }

@ -10,11 +10,11 @@ While [good society](less_retarded_society.md) tries to eliminate work, [capital

 [We](lrs.md) see it as essential to start educating people about the issue as well as starting to  eliminate jobs immediately with things such as [automation](automation.md) and [universal basic income](ubi.md).

-**Slavery has NOT been abolished.** On the contrary, more people than ever are enslaved, and the conditions don't much differ from those of slaves in older times. How is it so? Well, firstly slavery back then wasn't as bad as you see in the movies (just like for example a typical day of a cop is much different from what you'll see in a movie, it's a fucking movie) where you usually see black men in chains rowing in a ship or people dragging stones to the pyramids while being constantly whipped -- indeed that did happen, as it still happens today in the third world, but it wasn't so common, slaves were often owned by a family and were part of it. Yes, they were owned, but your [dog](dog.md) is also owned by you, and still love it and take great care of it, don't you? The slave was a worker but many times had a good relationship with his master, just as you can have a good relationship with your boss; the master didn't take pleasure in torturing the slave or overworking him to death in a week, he wanted to keep him in good shape and happy so that he would live long and do work for him. The slave might have had a relatively good life -- if he could read and write he might have been a transcriber or teacher of the master's children; [Diogenes](diogenes.md) for example was a wise slave who had great respect of his master. A slave could many times save up money and buy his freedom in a few years if he desired. Today's propaganda paints historical slavery as much worse so as to make seem today's slavery not so bad -- yes, it was bad back then but it is possibly even worse today -- the only changes that we made are just cosmetic: for example we don't call slave masters *masters* but *managers* or *bosses*, your employer still owns you through your work contract (which you technically "may quit", but won't because you need money, or because you would simply have to go to another slave master who will treat you exactly the same), we (at least in the first world) don't use physical force on people anymore but we use a much more effective and cruel psychological, economical and social pressure (it works just as well and keeps the slave in better physical shape, and we can call it "[progress](progress.md)"), we no longer physically chain people in place because we can tie people down by holding their families hostage or making them dependent on drugs, and we can track down any individual no matter where he goes, physical chain is not needed anymore, another cosmetic change we call "progress". People commit more [suicides](suicide.md) from overworking than ever, that alone says something. Many modern capitalists put people under much worse conditions than old slavemasters, for example at one point Henry Ford allowed his workers only 10 minutes for lunch -- that's as fucked up as it gets. If you think slavery doesn't exist, see for example the documentary *Shipbreakers* in which you'll see today's people -- men, women and children -- in India in conditions as miserable as you could ever image, being forced to dismantle ships all day long just to earn a few dimes for food, breathing toxic fumes, getting cancer and going blind, dying on daily basis from no work safety, living in small huts on beaches soaked with toxic chemical poison. That's today's world.
+**Slavery has NOT been abolished.** On the contrary, more people than ever are enslaved, and the conditions don't much differ from those of slaves in older times -- they are sometimes even worse. How is it so? Well, firstly slavery back then wasn't as bad as you see in the movies (just like for example a typical day of a cop is much different from what you'll see in a movie, it's a fucking movie) where you usually see black men whipped to row ships or slaves dragging stones to the pyramids while being constantly whipped until falling dead from exhaustion -- indeed that did happen, as it still happens today here and there, but it wasn't so common, slaves were often owned by a family and were part of it. Yes, they were owned, but your [dog](dog.md) is also owned by you, and you still love it and take good care of it, don't you? The slave was a worker but many times had a good relationship with his master, just as you can have a good relationship with your boss (who by the way also owns you, this ownership was just renamed to a "work contract"); the master didn't take pleasure in torturing the slave or overworking him to death for fun, he wanted to keep him in good shape and happy so that he would live long and do work for him. The slave might have had a relatively good life -- if he could read and write he might have been a transcriber or teacher of the master's children; [Diogenes](diogenes.md) for example was a wise slave who had great respect of his master. A slave could many times save up money and buy his freedom in a few years if he desired. This is practically the same as a work contract: yes, you can TECHNICALLY cancel your work contract, but then you won't get food for living, so [de facto](de_facto.md) you are in exact same situation -- you must keep saving money to be able to buy your freedom, there is absolutely zero difference except for using different [words](euphemism.md). Today's propaganda paints historical slavery as much worse so as to make seem today's slavery not so bad -- yes, it was bad back then but it is possibly even worse today (12 or 14 hour shifts, working whole year round, repetitive psychologically draining work in a catacomb under constant camera surveillance, ...) -- the only changes that we made are just cosmetic: for example we don't call slave masters *masters* but *managers* or *bosses*, your employer still owns you through your work contract (which again you technically "may quit", but won't because you need money, or because you would simply have to go to another slave master who will treat you exactly the same), we (at least in the first world) don't use DIRECT physical force (though we do use indirect one, e.g. police punishing [homeless](homelessness.md) thieves who HAVE TO steal in order to survive without working) on people anymore but we use a much more effective and cruel psychological, economical and social pressure (it works just as well and keeps the slave in better physical shape, and we can call it "[progress](progress.md)"), we no longer physically chain people in place because we can tie people down by holding their families hostage or making them dependent on drugs, and we can track down any individual no matter where he goes, physical chain is not needed anymore, another cosmetic change we call "progress". People commit more [suicides](suicide.md) from overworking than ever, that alone says something. Many modern capitalists put people under much worse conditions than old slavemasters, for example at one point Henry Ford allowed his workers only 10 minutes for lunch -- that's as fucked up as it gets. If you think slavery doesn't exist, see for example the documentary *Shipbreakers* in which you'll see today's people -- men, women and children -- in India in conditions as miserable as you could ever image, being forced to dismantle ships all day long just to earn a few dimes for food, breathing toxic fumes, getting [cancer](cancer.md) and going blind, dying on daily basis from no work safety, living in small huts on beaches soaked with toxic chemical poison. It's just a tip of the iceberg, and it is [today's world](21st_century.md).

 **Stop working right now!** Society has brainwashed you into constantly "planning for retirement", to keep postponing living for "later", to sacrifice the best years of your life, your whole life -- the only life you will ever have -- to do something you hate from your heart, to sacrifice time you could spend with your loved ones, by helping others, by creating art of love. You are constantly made to chase something and never just live -- you are working hard to graduate, then to pass exams in University, then to defend your thesis, then to get a job, then to get a promotion, then to pay off your mortgage, and suddenly you are 70 years old and your life is gone. Do not waste your life like this, start living right now.

-Friendly reminder that even the agricultural peasant only used to slave during summer, in the winter he just chilled and ate the food he farmed in the summer. [Capitalism](capitalism.md) made so much "[progress](progress.md)" that everyone is now a slave all year round :-]
+Friendly reminder that even the agricultural peasant only used to slave during summer, in the winter he just chilled and ate the food he farmed in the summer. Gorillas sleep 12 hours a day and the rest they spend having fun. [Capitalism](capitalism.md) made so much "[progress](progress.md)" that everyone is now a slave all year round :-] Even in feudalist times the peasants were obliged to donate just PART of their work to the overlord leech, the rest of time they spent working on their own fields -- today you donate practically 100% time to your slavemaster, you own nothing, you have no practically usable skill, you spend 100% time in your job and just go home to sleep and take a shower, you live in rented flat, you watch rented movies, you use rented software, you're renting your digital devices (you have to replace them every year or so because they stop working), you take drugs to make you not suffer a mental breakdown from it and you probably call this historically unprecedented [freedom](freedom.md).

 ## How To Avoid Work

--- a/xxiivv.md
+++ b/xxiivv.md
@ -18,6 +18,8 @@ There are also nice things though, a few of them being:

 What should be done: take the few good ideas he came up with that are not proprietary and [clone](clone.md) them, [unfuck](unfuck.md) them and isolate them from the lesbian shit. He definitely needs less attention.

+{ Let me say only this much: it is SAD when talented people are evil. ~drummyfish }
+
 ## See Also

 - [100r](100r.md)