Update

90s.md

@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ So, from the European point of view, here is a short summary of why 90s were so
 - Furthermore if something broke, it could easily be repaired, sometimes even by yourself. There were even people who specialized in repairing TVs and radios for example.
 - Professionals actually knew something about their profession, you could trust that if someone did something for living, he'd be kind of good at it. As a result things were generally of good quality, including for example movie dubbings and subtitles (nowadays it's standard that subtitles are made by people who cannot read or write or even talk at all), news, books, electronics, tools etc.
 - ALL computers had [CRT](crt.md)s!
+- People talked normally, there was no newspeak bullshit! The "issue" of politically correct pronouns didn't exist, such insanity would be seen as completely ridiculous, "he" was the default pronoun, everyone said "mankind", "spokesman", no one had an issue with it. If someone just mentioned that a pronoun can be "offensive" he would be probably be immediately put in a mental asylum.
 - There was absolute minimum of [ads](marketing.md) and they were somewhat bearable, not 100% aggressive brainwashing -- some even naively tried to pleasant and brings some actual art in. You could see a movie, then there would be two or three ads and another movie would follow, and that was on a commercial station, state TV had basically zero ads.
 - [Internet](internet.md) was actually good and free of idiots, it was elitist and only for nerds with no life. [Web](www.md) was young, only 1.0, all sites were nice, lightweight, non-commercial. [Gopher](gopher.md) was just as popular.
 - [Programming](programming.md) and IT was still cool and didn't make you wanna kill yourself -- [C](c.md) was used a lot, game developers wrote their own [engines](game_engine.md), webmasters actually wrote [HTML](html.md) and so on.

avpd.md

@@ -2,4 +2,4 @@
 
 *Avoiding the problem is in majority of cases the best solution to the problem.*
 
-Avoidant Personality Disorder (AVPD, also *[minimalist's](minimalism.md) brain damage*) is one of the great myriad of psychological personality "disorders" that's basically characterized by extreme shyness, social isolation and tendency to solve everything by avoidance -- people with this thing have no friends, social life, they isolate, don't go out, don't go to [work](work.md) (that's good), they constantly think about how they're judged by others, may try to adjust personality according to what the other people around seem to want etc. It could possibly be seen as the hardcore [minimalist](minimalism.md) [disease](disease.md), AVPD positives just minimize their life to the a bare minimum of things they can't avoid, like eating, breathing etc. Of course this goes with anxiety, panic attacks and [depression](depression.md), sometimes self harm and so on.
+Avoidant Personality Disorder (AVPD, also *[minimalist's](minimalism.md) brain damage*) is one of the great myriad of psychological personality "disorders" that's basically characterized by extreme shyness, social isolation and tendency to solve everything by avoidance -- people with this thing have no friends, social life, they isolate, don't go out, don't go to [work](work.md) (that's good), they constantly think about how they're judged by others, may try to adjust personality according to what the other people around seem to want etc. It could possibly be seen as the hardcore [minimalist](minimalism.md) [disease](disease.md), AVPD positives just minimize their life to a bare minimum of things they can't avoid like eating, breathing etc. Of course this goes with anxiety, panic attacks and [depression](depression.md), sometimes self harm and so on.

digital.md

@@ -13,3 +13,5 @@ The advantage of digital technology is its **resilience to [noise](noise.md)** w
 But this is not to say digital data can't become distorted too -- it can. It is just less likely and it's easier to deal with this. It for example happens that space particles (and similar physics phenomena, e.g. electronic interference) flip bits in computer memory, i.e. there is always a probability of some [bit](bit.md) flipping from 0 to 1 or vice versa. We call this **data [corruption](corruption.md)**. This may also happen due to physical damage to digital media (e.g. scratches on the surface of CDs), imperfections in computer network transmissions (e.g. packet loss over [wifi](wifi.md)) etc. However we can introduce further measures to prevent, detect and correct data corruption, e.g. by keeping [redundant](redundancy.md) copies (2 copies of data allow detecting corruption, 3 copies allow even its correction), keeping [checksums](checksum.md) or [hashes](hash.md) (which allow only detection of corruption but don't take much extra space), employing error correcting codes etc. We have to keep in mind that data corruption is very dangerous because a small local damage may destroy the whole data (owing partially to our wrong assumption that digital data data won't be damaged), while local damage to analog data will typically only destroys that one small affected part, keeping the rest intact. So let's be aware of this.
 
 Another way in which digital data can degrade similarly to analog data is **reencoding between lossy-[compressed](compression.md) formats** (in the spirit of the famous "needs more [jpeg](jpg.md)" [meme](meme.md)). A typical example is digital movies: as new standard for video encoding are emerging, old movies are being reconverted from old formats to the new ones, however as video is quite heavily lossy-compressed, losses and distortion of information happens between the reencodings. This is best seen in videos and images circulating on the internet that are constantly being ripped and converted between different formats. This way it may happen that digital movies recorded nowadays may only survive into the future in very low quality, just like old analog movies survived until today in degraded quality. This can be prevented by storing the original data only with lossless compression and with each new emerging format create the release of the data from the original.
+
+Digital vs analog is also discussed **from artistic points of view**, especially in video and audio recording, i.e. movies and [music](music.md). Digital and analog media differ qualitatively -- a movie shot on film (analog medium) looks different than one shot on digital camera, film captures light a bit differently, it has a different kind of [noise](noise.md) etc. It is possible to try to simulate the "analog look" with [postprocessing](postprocessing.md) filters but the results are always far from perfect; we have to realize that it is IMPOSSIBLE to make an analog version from digital recording because when we are capturing [real life](irl.md), we only capture a tiny bit of of [information](information.md) and lose the rest -- analog and digital recorders will capture different (even if mostly overlapping) parts of the real world and once we have the data, we can't retrieve that what has been thrown away. It's similar to wanting to extract an infrared photography from visible light photography -- they look similar but one can't be made from the other. So the decision has to really be made before recording. Now it is generally agreed that analog is aesthetically superior: it is kind of "softer", has nicer colors and the analog noise (unlike digital one) is very pleasant; digital recordings are clearer, sharper but basically sterile and soulless. The reason for using digital for all mainstream movies and songs nowadays is purely economical, it is just too much cheaper, quicker, faster and much more convenient to use digital (but the result looks like [shit](shit.md)).

feminism.md

@@ -54,4 +54,4 @@ Apparently in Korea feminists already practice segregation, they separate parkin
 
 Nicole Kidman is a whore.
 
-LMAO 2024 Olympic is already woman only :D (Men are "officially" allowed but they don't broadcast men sports lol.)
+LMAO 2024 Olympic Games are already woman only :D (Men are "officially" allowed too but they just don't broadcast men sports lol.)

nokia.md

@@ -1,9 +1,15 @@
 # Nokia
 
-TODO
+Nokia was a Finnish [company](corporation.md) that made crazy looking [cell phones](phone.md) back in the [1990s](90s.md) and early [2000s](2000s.md); it was the number one cell phone company back then. Formally it probably still exists but not practically, it died around the year 2010.
 
-For zoomers and young kids it has to be noted Nokia was likely the craziest cell phone company back then, the richness of their phones and creativity in design was absolutely above any boring [Apple](apple.md) shit that came later, Nokia phones were just colorful, wildly different in shape, style and "personality", they even wildly experimented with things like placing buttons all over the device, at a time when ergonomics of buttons was important for typing and already somewhat established, it was as if the designers were smoking something.
+TODO: more
+
+For [zoomers](zoomer.md) and young kids it has to be noted Nokia was one of the crazies guys back then, the richness of their phones and creativity in design was absolutely above any boring soulless [Apple](apple.md) [shit](shit.md) that came later, Nokia phones were just colorful, wildly different in shape, style and "personality", they even hilariously experimented with things like placing buttons all over the device, at a time when ergonomics of buttons was important for typing and already somewhat established, it was as if the designers were smoking something. This was back at the time when corporations still occasionally showed a bit of true creativity. Of course that is not to say corporations were ever net good, but they sometimes shat out something cool, unlike [today](21st_century.md). In fact Nokia probably died exactly for the reason that it was not afraid to experiment and create something cool, it just died to Apple which plays it safe and keeps selling the same phone over and over -- exactly as [capitalism](capitalism.md) intended it.
 
 { IMHO the peak of Nokia was 6600, I've never seen such beautiful design, AND it was such a high tech device back them, unreachable to normal people. Just the idea of having a real computer with an operating system in a pocket, with games, even a camera, that was absolutely unreal. I wanted it more than anything else really. It was also nice to compare it to the biggest competition Siemens SX1, that was a great device too. ~drummyfish }
 
-{ Also I remember I was once kicked out of a cell phone shop because they had 6600 there for customers to try out and I was spending hours playing some LOTR games on it xD I remember it like today, it gave me a bit of a trauma. ~drummyfish }
+{ Also I remember I was once kicked out of a cell phone shop because they had 6600 there for customers to try out and I was spending hours playing some LOTR games on it xD I remember it like today, it gave me a bit of a trauma, think it contributed to my social anxiety. ~drummyfish }
+
+## See Also
+
+- [90s](90s.md)

soyence.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 { I did my own peer review of this article and give it 10/10. ~drummyfish }
 
-Soyence (also spelled soyience) is [business](business.md), [propaganda](propaganda.md) and [politics](politics.md) trying to pass as [science](science.md), nowadays typically connected to [pseudoleftism](pseudoleft.md) (hence the word *[soy](soy.md)*), [pseudoskepticism](pseudoskepticism.md), [capitalism](capitalism.md) and [corporations](corporation.md). It is what in the [21st century](21st_century.md) has taken on the role that's historically been played by the church: that of establishing and maintaining orthodoxy for the control of mass population -- this time it is so called "science" or "rationality" that's used as the tool instead of [God](god.md) and religion, however the results are the same. Soyence is not about listening to what science says, it is about listetning to what *"reputable scientists"* say, and of course not questioning them; soyence is what the typical reddit [atheist](atheism.md) or [tiktok](tiktok.md) [feminist](feminism.md) believes science is or what Neil De Grass Tyson tells you science is. While science is about collecting facts and drawing conclusions, soyence is about setting conclusions and finding or fabricating facts that support them. One red flag to watch out in relation to soyence is a great weight put on **reputation** -- in true science reputation plays no role, only results do; reputation and its great value for one's acceptance is rather part of [politics](politics.md) (and maybe show business). Notice for example how in the past it was more common to hear "science has found X" (as in "logic itself shows this fact") rather than "scientists have found X", which is more common nowadays -- mentally we have shifted to separate people to "scientists", those who "know" and dictate what's true, and non-scientists, those who don't know and must just listen. Soyence calls itself the one and only science^TM and [gatekeeps](gatekeeping.md) the term by calling unpopular science (such as that regarding human [race](race.md), questioning official versions of [historical](history.md) events or safety of big pharma [vaccines](vaccine.md)) "[pseudoscience](pseudoscience.md)" and "[conspiracy theories](conspiracy_theory.md)". Soyence itself is pseudoscience but it has an official status, approval of [state](state.md), strong connection to [politics](politics.md), it is mainstream, popular, controlled by those in power, [censored](censorship.md) ("moderated") and intentionally misleading. Soyence can be encountered in much of [academia](academia.md), on [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) and in other popular/mainstream media such as TV "documentaries" and [YouTube](youtube.md). A soyence supporter wrongfully believes that reason wouldn't allow such a large scale mass population manipulation (despite this happening over and over throughout history) -- people at large aren't reasonable and reason [cannot](yes_they_can.md) beat [propaganda](propaganda.md); only the highest naivety could make you believe that politics will follow science -- it's the other way around, and always has been.
+Soyence (also spelled soyience) is [business](business.md), [propaganda](propaganda.md) and [politics](politics.md) trying to pass as [science](science.md), nowadays typically connected to [pseudoleftism](pseudoleft.md) (hence the word *[soy](soy.md)*), [pseudoskepticism](pseudoskepticism.md), [capitalism](capitalism.md) and [corporations](corporation.md). It is what in the [21st century](21st_century.md) has taken on the role that's historically been played by the church: that of establishing and maintaining orthodoxy for the control of mass population -- this time it is so called "science" or "rationality" that's used as the tool instead of [God](god.md) and religion, however the results are the same. Soyence is not about listening to what science says, it is about listetning to what *"reputable scientists"* say, and of course not questioning them; soyence is what the typical reddit [atheist](atheism.md) or [tiktok](tiktok.md) [feminist](feminism.md) believes science is or what Neil De Grass Tyson tells you science is. While science is about collecting facts and drawing conclusions, soyence is about setting conclusions and finding or fabricating facts that support them. One red flag to watch out in relation to soyence is a great weight put on **reputation** -- in true science reputation plays no role, only results do; reputation and its great value for one's acceptance is rather part of [politics](politics.md) (and maybe show business). Notice for example how in the past it was more common to hear "science has found X" (as in "logic itself shows this fact") rather than "scientists have found X", which is more common nowadays -- mentally we have shifted to separate people to "scientists", those who "know" and dictate what's true, and non-scientists, those who don't know and must just listen. Soyence calls itself the one and only science^TM and [gatekeeps](gatekeeping.md) the term by calling unpopular science (such as that regarding human [race](race.md), questioning official versions of [historical](history.md) events or safety of big pharma [vaccines](vaccine.md)) "[pseudoscience](pseudoscience.md)" and "[conspiracy theories](conspiracy_theory.md)". Soyence itself is pseudoscience but it has an official status, approval of [state](state.md), strong connection to [politics](politics.md), it is mainstream, popular, controlled by those in power, [censored](censorship.md) ("moderated") and intentionally misleading. Soyence can be encountered in much of [academia](academia.md), on [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) and in other popular/mainstream media such as TV "documentaries" and [YouTube](youtube.md). A soyence supporter wrongfully believes that reason wouldn't allow such a large scale mass population manipulation (despite this happening over and over throughout history) -- people at large aren't reasonable and reason [cannot](yes_they_can.md) beat [propaganda](propaganda.md); only the highest naivety could make you believe that politics will follow science -- it's the other way around, and always has been. With enough power [anything is possible](yes_they_can.md). Big science is a big dirty game just like big politics or big corporate business, anyone thinking that corruption avoids big science or that it's only present in small amounts is naive like an unborn child, it is literally like believing big politics is free of corruption and done by good selfless people who are concerned about securing well being for the citizens.
 
 Compared to good old [fun](fun.md) pseudosciences such as [astrology](astrology.md) and [flat Earth](flat_earth.md), soyence is extra sneaky by purposefully trying to blend in with real science, i.e. within a certain truly scientific field, such as biology, there is a soyentific [cancer](cancer.md) mixed in by activists, corporations and state, that may be hard to separate for common folk and many times even for pros. This is extremely [harmful](harmful.md) as in the eyes of retarded people (basically everyone) the neighboring legit science gives credibility to propaganda bullshit. There is a tendency to think we somehow magically live in a time that's fundamentally different from other times in history in which it is now a pretty clear and uncontroversial fact that the name of science was abused hard by propaganda, almost everyone easily accepts that historically politically constructed lies were presented as confirmed by science, but somehow people refuse to believe it could be the case nowadays. In times of Nazism there was no doubt about race being a completely scientific term and that Jews were scientifically confirmed to be the inferior race -- nowadays in times when anti Nazis have won and politics is based on denying existence of race somehow scientists start to magically find evidence that no such thing as race has ever existed -- how convenient! And just in case you wanted to check if it's actually true, you'll be labeled a racist and you won't find job ever again.
 

steve_jobs.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Steve Jobs (AKA Steve "more jobs for everyone" and Steve Jewbs) was the prototyp
 ```
             _
            |_|   ___
-            \ \ /__ \
+            \ \ /___\
              \ \|'L'|
               \ \_"_/
                \     \

wiki_stats.md

@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
 This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
 
 - number of articles: 601
-- number of commits: 898
-- total size of all texts in bytes: 4436009
-- total number of lines of article texts: 33761
+- number of commits: 899
+- total size of all texts in bytes: 4439785
+- total number of lines of article texts: 33795
 - number of script lines: 294
 - occurrences of the word "person": 9
 - occurrences of the word "nigger": 98
@@ -35,26 +35,26 @@ longest articles:
 
 top 50 5+ letter words:
 
-- which (2496)
-- there (1917)
-- people (1735)
-- example (1510)
-- other (1378)
+- which (2499)
+- there (1918)
+- people (1740)
+- example (1513)
+- other (1379)
 - number (1257)
-- about (1215)
+- about (1216)
 - software (1203)
 - program (988)
 - because (951)
-- their (931)
+- their (932)
 - would (913)
 - being (852)
-- something (847)
-- called (844)
-- language (843)
+- something (848)
+- called (845)
+- language (844)
 - things (840)
 - numbers (808)
 - simple (792)
-- computer (770)
+- computer (771)
 - without (746)
 - programming (728)
 - function (714)
@@ -65,30 +65,49 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
 - world (649)
 - should (632)
 - doesn (631)
-- while (621)
+- while (623)
 - point (612)
 - games (605)
 - society (594)
-- still (591)
-- drummyfish (579)
+- still (592)
+- drummyfish (580)
+- using (572)
 - simply (572)
-- using (570)
 - possible (564)
 - though (557)
-- course (538)
+- course (539)
 - similar (537)
 - https (536)
 - memory (528)
 - always (516)
 - value (510)
 - technology (508)
+- really (501)
 - basically (500)
-- really (499)
 - probably (499)
 
 latest changes:
 
 ```
+Date:   Sat Oct 12 16:21:03 2024 +0200
+  chess.md
+  czechia.md
+  drummyfish.md
+  iq.md
+  jokes.md
+  left_right.md
+  minimalism.md
+  nationalism.md
+  npc.md
+  random_page.md
+  raycasting.md
+  steve_jobs.md
+  tool_slave.md
+  tranny_software.md
+  transsexual.md
+  wiki_pages.md
+  wiki_stats.md
+  wiki_tldr.md
 Date:   Fri Oct 11 19:48:53 2024 +0200
   chess.md
   gay.md
@@ -109,29 +128,14 @@ Date:   Fri Oct 11 19:48:53 2024 +0200
   tranny.md
   transsexual.md
   ubi.md
-  wiki_pages.md
-  wiki_stats.md
-  wiki_tldr.md
-  wikipedia.md
-Date:   Wed Oct 9 14:00:06 2024 +0200
-  ashley_jones.md
-  chess.md
-  doom.md
-  hacking.md
-  lmao.md
-  procgen.md
-  quine.md
-  random_page.md
-  usenet.md
-  wiki_pages.md
-  wiki_stats.md
 ```
 
 most wanted pages:
 
 - [data_type](data_type.md) (14)
-- [irl](irl.md) (13)
 - [embedded](embedded.md) (13)
+- [irl](irl.md) (12)
+- [hitler](hitler.md) (11)
 - [complex_number](complex_number.md) (11)
 - [cli](cli.md) (11)
 - [buddhism](buddhism.md) (11)
@@ -139,16 +143,15 @@ most wanted pages:
 - [tree](tree.md) (10)
 - [quake](quake.md) (10)
 - [meme](meme.md) (10)
-- [hitler](hitler.md) (10)
 - [drm](drm.md) (10)
 - [sdl](sdl.md) (9)
 - [pointer](pointer.md) (9)
 - [emacs](emacs.md) (9)
 - [syntax](syntax.md) (8)
+- [retard](retard.md) (8)
 - [html](html.md) (8)
 - [gpu](gpu.md) (8)
 - [gpl](gpl.md) (8)
-- [gimp](gimp.md) (8)
 
 most popular and lonely pages:
 
@@ -178,8 +181,8 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
 - [free_culture](free_culture.md) (82) 
 - [art](art.md) (81) 
 - [public_domain](public_domain.md) (79) 
+- [woman](woman.md) (78) 
 - [corporation](corporation.md) (78) 
-- [woman](woman.md) (77) 
 - [programming_language](programming_language.md) (77) 
 - [internet](internet.md) (76) 
 - ...

wizard.md

@@ -6,5 +6,6 @@ There is an [imageboard](imageboard.md) for wizards called [wizardchan](wizchan.
 
 ## See Also
 
+- [drummyfish](drummyfish.md)
 - [incel](incel.md)
 - [volcel](volcel.md)

woman.md

@@ -145,10 +145,14 @@ I have found the website of **[Ashley Jones](ashley_jones.md)**. She immediately
 
 PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE Ashley don't fuck it up please, stay our Internet queen don't get [shitty](shit.md) pretty please! (LRS note for those who are retarded: yes, this is a bit of a hyperbole, don't unironically make [cults of personalities](hero_culture.md). But Ashley is officially a mini queen of the Internetz now.)
 
-I also realized babushkas and old grandmas in general are often based, they just come from the better times.
+Now I also remembered one female psychologist who helped me very much <3 I apologize to her too.
+
+I also realized babushkas and old grandmas in general are often based, they just come from the better times when women were just normal women and in general people were better.
 
 *Your name here? Let me know if you come by another candidate for a based woman :)*
 
+{ NOTE: Someone may ask what do I even apologize for if I claim that this article is not offensive? Well, let's say I may still want to apologize for example for underestimating someone, even if that is not my mistake at all (making thousands of imprecise judgments every day is an inevitable part of everyone's life). I don't think anything in the article is wrong and that I SHOULD apologize, but I may still want to do it to make someone feel better, EVEN if I don't feel guilty or obliged to. It's as if I decide to pay someone money even if I'm not obliged to, or more like saying "I feel and share your pain". So don't mistake this for me negating the article, I am just trying to express sadness over the fact that due to feminism a based woman was grouped together with the average ones, and also to show I really am friendly and will acknowledge truth when I'm confronted with it. ~drummyfish }
+
 ## See Also
 
 - [man](man.md)