This commit is contained in:
Miloslav Ciz 2024-10-25 00:41:24 +02:00
parent ced34db6fa
commit af69eeea02
14 changed files with 1845 additions and 1844 deletions

View file

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
*Capitalism is how you enslave a man with his approval.*
Capitali$m is the worst socioeconomic system we've yet seen in [history](history.md),^[source](logic.md) based on pure greed, [culture](culture.md) of [slavery](work.md) and artificially sustained conflict between everyone in society (so called [competition](competition.md)), abandoning all [morals](morality.md) and putting [money](money.md) and profit (so called [capital](capital.md)) above everything else including preservation of [life](life.md) itself, capitalism fuels the worst in [people](people.md) and forces them to compete and suffer for basic resources, even in a world where abundance of resources is already possible to be achieved -- of course, capitalism is a purely [rightist](left_right.md) idea. Capitalism goes against [progress](progress.md) (see e.g. [antivirus paradox](antivirus_paradox.md)), [good technology](lrs.md) and [freedom](freedom.md), it supports immense waste of resources, [wars](war.md), abuse of people and animals, destruction of environment, decline of morals, deterioration of [art](art.md), invention of [bullshit](bullshit.md) (bullshit jobs, bullshit laws, ...), utilization and perfection of torture methods, [brainwashing](brainwashing.md), [censorship](censorship.md) and so on. In a sense capitalism can be seen as **slavery 2.0** or *universal slavery*, a more sophisticated form of slavery, one which denies the label by calling itself the polar opposite, "freedom", when in fact capitalism is merely a "freedom" to oppress others -- underlying every argument for capitalism is an argument against freedom itself; capitalism manipulates people into them approving and voluntarily partaking in their own enslavement (capitalist slaves are called wage slaves or *wagies*) -- this new form of slavery which enslaves everyone evolved because the old form with strictly separated classes of slaves and masters was becoming unsustainable, with the enslaved majority revolting, causing civil wars etc. This alone already seems to many like a good reason for [suicide](suicide.md), however wage and [consumption](consumerism.md) slavery is still only a small part of capitalist [dystopia](dystopia.md) -- capitalism brings on destruction basically to every part of civilization. It it also often likened to a **[cancer](cancer.md) of society**; one that is ever expanding, destroying everything with commercialism, materialism, waste and destruction, growing uncontrollably with the sole goal of just never stopping an ever accelerating growth. Nevertheless, it's been truthfully stated that "it is now easier to imagine the end of all life than any substantial change in capitalism." Another famous quote is that "capitalism is the belief that the worst of men driven by the nastiest motives will somehow work for the benefit of everyone", which describes its principles quite well.
Capitali$m is the worst socioeconomic system we've yet seen in [history](history.md),^[source](logic.md) based on pure greed, [culture](culture.md) of [slavery](work.md) and artificially sustained conflict between everyone in society (so called [competition](competition.md)), abandoning all [morals](morality.md) and putting [money](money.md) and profit (so called [capital](capital.md)) above everything else including preservation of [life](life.md) itself, capitalism fuels the worst in [people](people.md) and forces them to compete and suffer for basic resources, even in a world where abundance of resources is already possible to be achieved -- of course, capitalism is a purely [rightist](left_right.md) idea. Capitalism goes against [progress](progress.md) (see e.g. [antivirus paradox](antivirus_paradox.md)), [good technology](lrs.md) and [freedom](freedom.md), it supports immense waste of resources, [wars](war.md), abuse of people and animals, destruction of environment, decline of morals, deterioration of [art](art.md), invention of [bullshit](bullshit.md) (bullshit jobs, bullshit laws, ...), utilization and perfection of torture methods, [brainwashing](brainwashing.md), [censorship](censorship.md) and so on. In a sense capitalism can be seen as **slavery 2.0** or *universal slavery*, a more sophisticated form of slavery, one which denies the label by calling itself the polar opposite, "freedom", when in fact capitalism is merely a "freedom" to oppress others -- underlying every argument for capitalism is an argument against freedom itself; capitalism manipulates people into them approving and voluntarily partaking in their own enslavement (capitalist slaves are called wage slaves or *wagies*) -- this new form of slavery which enslaves everyone evolved because the old form with strictly separated classes of slaves and masters was becoming unsustainable, with the enslaved majority revolting, causing civil wars etc. This alone already seems to many like a good reason for [suicide](suicide.md), however wage and [consumption](consumerism.md) slavery is still only a small part of capitalist [dystopia](dystopia.md) -- capitalism brings on destruction basically to every part of civilization. It it also often likened to a **[cancer](cancer.md) of society**; one that is ever expanding, destroying everything with commercialism, materialism, waste and destruction, growing uncontrollably with the sole goal of just never stopping an ever accelerating growth. Nevertheless, it's been truthfully stated that "it is now easier to imagine the end of all life than any substantial change in capitalism." Capitalism will be there long after humans are gone. Another famous quote is that "capitalism is the belief that the worst of men driven by the nastiest motives will somehow work for the benefit of everyone", which describes its principles quite well.
{ Some web bashing capitalism I just found: http://digdeeper.club/articles/capitalismcancer.xhtml, read only briefly, seems to contain some nice gems capturing the rape of people. ~drummyfish }

2
elo.md
View file

@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ The Elo system was created specifically for chess (even though it can be applied
**Elo rates only RELATIVE performance**, not absolute, i.e. the rating number of a player says nothing in itself, it is only the DIFFERENCE in rating points between two players that matters, so in an extreme case two players rated 300 and 1000 in one rating pool may in another one be rated 10300 and 11000 (the difference of 700 is the only thing that stays the same, mean value can change freely). This may be influenced by initial conditions and things such as **rating inflation** (or deflation) -- if for example a [chess](chess.md) website assigns some start rating to new users which tends to overestimate an average newcomer's abilities, newcomers will come to the site, play a few games which they will lose, then they [ragequit](ragequit.md) but they've already fed their points to the good players, causing the average rating of a good player to grow over time.
Elo rating can also be converted to (or from) alternative measures such as material or time advantage, i.e. given let's say two chess players with known ratings, we may be able to say how big of a handicap the stronger player must suffer in order for the two to be on par. However the relationship will probably not be simple, we can't say "this much Elo difference equals this many pawns in handicap" -- having a two pawn material advantage in a beginner game hardly makes a difference but on the absolute top level losing two pawns is decisively also a lost game (despite this some approximations were given, e.g. Fisher and Kannan estimated that in computer chess 100 Elo was roughly equivalent to one pawn).
**Keep in mind Elo is a big simplification of reality**, as is any attempt at capturing skill with a single number -- even though it is a very good predictor of something akin a "skill" and outcomes of games, trying to capture a "skill" with a single number is similar to e.g. trying to capture such a multidimensional thing as intelligence with a single dimensional [IQ](iq.md) number. For example due to many different areas of a game to be mastered and different playstyles [transitivity](transitivity.md) may be broken in reality: it may happen that player A mostly beats player B, player B mostly beats player C and player C mostly beats player A, which Elo won't capture.
## How It Works

View file

@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ TODO
- **"Just because X doesn't mean Y"**: this is completely grammatically wrong, it is either "Just the fact that X doesn't mean Y." OR "Just because X not(Y)." You just have to hear it, but here is an attempt at showing you why this it's wrong: "I don't have to cry just because I'm sad.", we can reverse the sentences to "Just because I'm sad I don't have to cry" OR "Just the fact that I'm sad doesn't mean I have to cry".
- **"how it looks like"**: It's either fucking "what it looks like" OR "how it looks", NOT both at once.
- **Using apostrophe for plural**, especially with [acronym](acronym.md)s, for example "VPN's" (WRONG) instead of "VPNs" (correct). With short words, e.g. "a", 99.9999999999% will use apostrophe for plural ("a's" instead of as), demonstrating their stupidity.
- **Spelling**: beginner stuff like "its" vs "it's", "they're" vs "their", "effects" vs "affects" etc.
- **Spelling**: beginner stuff like "loose" vs "lose", "its" vs "it's", "they're" vs "their", "effects" vs "affects" etc.
- **Countable vs uncountable** bitch, I double dare you to ever say shit like "less mistakes".
- ...

8
faq.md
View file

@ -46,13 +46,13 @@ See the article on [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md), it contain
### So is there a whole community here or what? Do you have forums or anything?
Well, firstly LRS by [anarchist](anarchism.md) principles avoids establishing a centralized community with things such as platforms, senior members, moderators, bureaucracy, codified rules etc. Every nice thing that went this way turned to shit once it became more popular and grew, corruption always appears and prevails (see [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md), [GNU](gnu.md)/[FSF](fsf.md), [Linux](linux.md) etc.). So we rather aim for a community of decentralized, loosely associated individuals and small entities with greatly overlapping sets of values rather than any organizations etc. So rather think something like many people with their own websites referring and linking to each other.
To start off let's first make it clear that LRS, being an [anarchist](anarchism.md) philosophy, avoids establishing a centralized "governed" community sporting things such as "platforms", senior members, chains of trust, moderators, bureaucracy, codified rules (aka laws) etc., i.e. there is no aim to set up forums, non-profits or anything similar. Although LRS might sometimes kind of support such communities, when established by third parties, as a temporary lesser evil, we must know it's never ideal and that essentially every nice thing that embraced a big "central hub"/authority turned to shit once it grew and turned very popular -- corruption always emerges and eventually takes over (see [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md), [GNU](gnu.md)/[FSF](fsf.md), [Linux](linux.md) etc.). So we rather aim for a community of decentralized, loosely associated individuals and small entities with a mostly overlapping sets of values rather than any kind of "main" organization. And so rather think in these terms: many people with their own websites referring and linking to each other, sharing ideas over email etc.
At the moment this wiki/movement/ideology/etc. is basically me ([drummyfish](drummyfish.md)), and there are a few people around who agree more or less with me. There are quite a few people who like this to various degree and contact me from time to time, many just write me a one time email, suggest something, thank me, suggest I kill myself etc. -- currently I would count these in dozens, from which I estimate there is a non-negligible number of silent lurkers (given that only 1 in relatively many readers will actually write me an email).
At the moment this wiki/movement/ideology/etc. is basically me ([drummyfish](drummyfish.md)) -- and maybe by its very definition it will always stay this way -- however then there are a few people around who agree more or less with me and who try to do similar stuff. I am very glad I've seen people inspired and actually do something thanks to reading my stuff, it means the world to me. There are such who like this to various degree and contact me more of less often, many just write one email, suggest something, thank me, share something nice or bad, sometimes suggest I kill myself, usual stuff -- it's really hard to estimate numbers but there is a number of closer followers and probably yet a larger count of silent lurkers (given that only 1 in relatively many readers will actually write me an email).
I don't have any web analytics set up, I could probably dig up at least number of site downloads or something but I don't even look at that, I don't want to aim for popularity.
I don't have any web analytics set up, I could probably dig up at least number of site downloads or something but I don't even look at that, I don't want to aim for popularity. It's probably even better if this stays in the underground anyway.
A forum, mailing list or something would possibly be nice, so far I've only experimented with more or less private text boards for closer friends and similar things, no one made anything bigger yet and I would be hesitant to call it an "official" LRS forum anyway, exactly to prevent growing into some kind of corrupt "democratic internet community" of which there are too many nowadays. I am also absolute shit at running any "community" (I tried several times, always failed) and also pretty anxious of collaborating with someone, making hard connections to other project etc. So if you'd like to make a LRS-focused forum (or anything similar), it would be best if you just make it your own thing -- of course I'll be very glad if you refer to my stuff etc., I just won't be able to keep up with another project, play an admin or something, I will only be able to be a regular user of that forum.
A forum, mailing list or something would possibly be nice, so far I've only experimented with more or less private text boards, game servers and stuff like that for closer friends, no one made anything bigger yet and I would be hesitant to call it an "official" LRS forum anyway, exactly to prevent growing into some kind of corrupt "democratic internet community" of which there are too many now. I am also absolute shit at running any "community" (I tried several times, always failed) and also pretty anxious about the idea of collaborating with someone, even officially associate with other sites etc. It's not just my social anxiety but also the fear of social pressure that collaboration or affiliation might bring, which could bias what I write. So if you'd like to make a LRS-focused forum (or anything similar), it would be best if you just make it your own thing -- of course I'll be very glad if you refer to my stuff etc., I just won't be able to keep up with another project, play an admin or something, I will only be able to be a regular user of that forum.
### Why the angry and aggressive tone, can't you write in a nicer way, especially when you advocate love etc.?

View file

@ -6,29 +6,27 @@ Unfortunately some [shit](shit.md) is surrounding IOCCC too, for example confusi
Hacking the rules of the contest is also encouraged and there is an extra award for "worst abuse of the rules".
To list a few common ideas employed in the programs let's mentioned these:
To list a few common ideas/programs that have appeared let's mentioned these:
- formatting source code as [ASCII art](ascii_art.md)
- misleading identifiers and comments
- extreme [macro](macro.md)/[preprocessor](preprocessor.md) abuse
- abuse of compiler flags
- different behavior under different C standards
- different behavior under different C standards/compilers
- doing simple things the hard way, e.g. by avoiding loops
- including weird files like `/dev/tty` or recursively including itself
- [code golfing](code_golf.md)
- weird stuff like the main function [recursion](recursion.md) or even using it as a signal handler :)
- ...
And let us also mention a few winning entries:
- doing funny stuff like computing [pi](pi.md) by calculating area of a circle that is physically drawn in the source code
- program whose source code is taken from its file name (using `__FILE__`)
- [ray tracer](ray_tracing.md) in < 30 LOC formatted as ASCII art
- operating system with multi-tasking, GUI and filesystem support
- neural [machine learning](machine_learning.md) on text in < 4KB
- [neural](neural_net.md) [machine learning](machine_learning.md) on text in < 4KB
- program printing "hello world" with error messages during compilation
- [X11](x11.md) Minecraft-like game
- [web browser](web_browser.md)
- self-replicating programs
- [chess](chess.md) programs
- ...
## See Also

View file

@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ Also remember the worst thing you can do to a joke is put a [disclaimer](disclai
- Why is the maximum speed called terminal velocity? Because [GUI](gui.md)s are slow.
- What's the worst kind of [lag](lag.md)? Gulag.
- Ingame chat: "What's the country in the middle of north Africa?" [{BANNED}](niger.md)
- What does a [Marxist](marxism.md) call C++? Class struggle.
- What sound does an angry [C](c.md) programmer make? ARGCCCC ARGVVVVVVVV
- I have a mentally ill friend who tried to design the worst [operating system](os.md) on purpose. It boots for at least 10 minutes, then it changes the user's desktop background to random ads and it randomly crashes to make the user angry. He recently told me he is getting sued by [Microsoft](microsoft.md) for violating their look and feel.
- I am using a super minimal system, it only has one package installed on it. It is called [systemd](systemd.md) (alternatively [Emacs](emacs.md)).
@ -30,6 +31,7 @@ Also remember the worst thing you can do to a joke is put a [disclaimer](disclai
- "Never test for a bug that you don't know how to fix." --manager; "If we cannot fix it, it isn't broken." --also manager
- a joke for minimalists:
- When is [Micro$oft](microsoft.md) finally gonna make a product that doesn't suck???! Probably when they start manufacturing vacuum cleaners.
- What do you call a programming languages specifically designed for [women](woman.md)? [Object oriented](oop.md) languages.
- Why does a [Ruby](ruby.md) hater dislike [gemini](gemini.md)? Because it has gem. { Thanks to my dear friend :D ~drummyfish }
- Can [free software](free_software.md) lead to insanity? I don't know, but it can make you [GNU](gnu.md)ts.
- Man sits on a toilet, taking a [shit](shit.md), he takes a piece of toilet paper, wipes sweat off of his face, then wipes his ass with it and goes away. The next day he does the same, he sits, takes a shit, wipes his face, wipes his ass, goes away. The third day he goes to the toilet, takes a shit, wipes his ass, wipes his face... oh shit :D { I came up with this when I was taking a shit. ~drummyfish }

View file

@ -1,33 +1,31 @@
# LRS Wiki
LRS wiki, also Less Retarded Wiki, is a [public domain](public_domain.md) ([CC0](cc0.md)) [encyclopedia](encyclopedia.md) focused on truly good, [minimalist](minimalism.md) [technology](tech.md), mainly [computer](computer.md) [software](sw.md) -- so called [less retarded software](lrs.md) (LRS) which should serve the people at large -- while also exploring related topics such as the relationship between technology and society, promoting so called [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md). The basic motivation behind LRS and its wiki is unconditional [love](love.md) of all life, and the goal of LRS is to move towards creating a truly useful, [selfless](selflessness.md) technology that maximally helps all living beings as much as possible -- it does so while at the same time developing its own [culture](culture.md), one that's much more sane and compatible with the desired goal, unlike the [toxic](toxic.md) [modern](modern.md) [fascist](fascism.md) culture of the [21st century](21st_century.md). As such the wiki rejects for example [capitalist software](capitalist_software.md) (and [capitalism](capitalism.md) itself), [bloated](bloat.md) software, [intellectual property](intellectual_property.md) laws ([copyright](copyright.md), [patents](patent.md), ...) [censorship](censorship.md), [pseudoleftism](pseudoleft.md) ([political correctness](political_correctness.md), [cancel culture](cancel_culture.md), [COC](coc.md)s ...) etc. It embraces [free as in freedom](free_software.md), simple technology, i.e. [Unix philosophy](unix_philosophy.md), [suckless](suckless.md) software, [anarcho pacifism](anpac.md), [racial realism](racial_realism.md), [free speech](free_speech.md), [veganism](veganism.md) etc. As a work promoting pure [good](good.md) in a [time](21st_century.md) of universal rule of [evil](evil.md) it is greatly controversial, misunderstood and often met with hostility. However it already gained at least a few englightened followers.
LRS wiki, also Less Retarded Wiki, is a [public domain](public_domain.md) ([CC0](cc0.md)) non-commercial anti[capitalist](capitalism.md) (precisely [anarcho pacifist](anpac.md)) [encyclopedia](encyclopedia.md) focused on truly good, [minimalist](minimalism.md) [technology](tech.md), mainly [computer](computer.md) [software](sw.md) -- so called [less retarded software](lrs.md) (LRS) which should serve the people at large -- while also exploring related topics such as the relationship between technology and society, promoting so called [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md). LRS wiki is a source of high quality truth and the voice of reason in the [age of lies and brainwashing](21st_century.md). The basic motivation behind LRS and its wiki is unconditional [love](love.md) of all life, and the goal of LRS is to move towards creating a truly useful, [selfless](selflessness.md) technology that maximally helps all living beings as much as possible -- it does so while at the same time developing its own [culture](culture.md), one that's much more sane and compatible with the desired goal, unlike the [toxic](toxic.md) [modern](modern.md) [fascist](fascism.md) culture of the [21st century](21st_century.md). As such the wiki rejects for example [capitalist software](capitalist_software.md) (and [capitalism](capitalism.md) itself), [bloated](bloat.md) software, [intellectual property](intellectual_property.md) laws ([copyright](copyright.md), [patents](patent.md), ...) [censorship](censorship.md), [pseudoleftism](pseudoleft.md) ([political correctness](political_correctness.md), [cancel culture](cancel_culture.md), [COC](coc.md)s ...) etc. It embraces [free as in freedom](free_software.md), simple technology, i.e. [Unix philosophy](unix_philosophy.md), [suckless](suckless.md) software, [anarcho pacifism](anpac.md), [racial realism](racial_realism.md), [free speech](free_speech.md), [veganism](veganism.md) etc. As a work promoting pure [good](good.md) in a [time](21st_century.md) of universal rule of [evil](evil.md) it is greatly controversial, misunderstood and often met with hostility. However it already gained at least a few englightened followers.
The wiki is not funded by anyone, it doesn't have to be funded because it's not a capitalist project, it is also not affiliated with anyone, its author has no career for which he would have to fear, he has no friends or family, no material desires, no fear of demonetization/demonization, jail or death, so he can write truth without being limited by anything.
The wiki is not funded by anyone, it doesn't have to be funded because it's not a capitalist project and it cost literally zero [monies](money.md) to make, it is not even a non-profit, so it doesn't have to obey by any laws or suck some bureaucratic dick, it is also not affiliated with anyone, its author has no career for which he would have to fear, he has no friends, family, community or collaborators, no material desires, no fear of demonetization/demonization, bans, [cancelling](cancel_culture.md), jail or [death](death.md), so he can write truth without being limited by anything.
LRS wiki was started by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md) on November 3 2021 as a way of recording and sharing his views, experience and knowledge about technology, as well as for creating a completely public domain educational resource and account of current society for future generations. It was forked from so called "based wiki" at a point when all the content on it had been made by drummyfish, so at this point LRS wiki is 100% drummyfish's own work; over time it became kind of a snapshot of drummyfish's brain and so the wiki doesn't allow contributions (but allows and encourages [forks](fork.md)).
LRS wiki was started by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md) on November 3 2021 as a way of recording and sharing his views, experience and knowledge about technology, as well as for creating a completely public domain educational resource and account of current society for future generations. It was forked from so called "based wiki" at a point when all the content on it had been made by drummyfish, so at this point LRS wiki is 100% drummyfish's own work; over time it became kind of a snapshot of drummyfish's brain and so the wiki doesn't allow contributions (but allows and encourages [forks](fork.md), blatant copy pastes of anything from it to anywhere else etc.).
Some distinguishing features of LRS wiki that make it much better than other wikis include:
- Everything is absolutely and completely public domain under CC0 and there appears nothing under "fair use" so you can blindly copy-paste any piece of text or code and do absolutely whatever you want with it, without having to give credit or maintain some back link or any similar kind of [bullshit](bullshit.md) insanity.
- Everything is absolutely and completely public domain under CC0 and there appears nothing under "fair use" so you can blindly copy-paste any piece of text or code and do absolutely whatever you want with it, without having to give credit or maintain some back link or any similar kind of [bullshit](bullshit.md) insanity. Unlike Wikipedia, LRS wiki a FULLY free cultural work, i.e. there are no embedded "fair use" pieces of proprietary content.
- There are no images, only [ASCII art](ascii_art.md), making it very small in size, free and readable on devices that can only display text.
- Use of [Unicode](unicode.md) is minimized to absolutely bare minimum so you'll probably never encounter problems related to encoding -- again, anything that can display ASCII will be able to read the wiki.
- There is absolutely no moderation, no [code of censorship](coc.md) and the wiki doesn't adhere to cultural standards of [21st century](21st_century.md) -- for example it never uses "gender neutral" pronouns -- it rather tries to focus on real issues and reflect truth.
- There are no [SJW](sjw.md), [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) or [rightist](right.md) editors.
- Articles try to be written somewhat well, they aim to actually help most people rather than be an ugly dump of every information ever discovered about the subject.
- Articles often contain simple runnable code examples, mostly in plain [C](c.md) code aligned with LRS principles, which can normally just be copy pasted into a file and compiled without additional libraries.
- There are no [SJWs](sjw.md), [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) or [rightist](right.md) editors.
- Articles try to be written somewhat well, they aim to actually help most people rather than be a gigantic stinky dump of every information ever discovered about the subject bashed together by random passerbys.
- Articles often contain simple runnable code examples, mostly in plain [C](c.md) code aligned with LRS philosophy, which can normally just be copy pasted into a file and compiled without additional libraries.
- There are no [ads](marketing.md) of course and there will never be a single one, it is impossible for LRS to contain any ad just as it is impossible for human to breathe water.
- It is not a website, websites is just one form of the wiki -- it exists in other formats such as plaintext on [gopher](gopher.md), one long pdf document, one long HTML document, collection of markdown files etc.
- It is not a website, website is just one of many possible forms of the wiki -- the wiki is a literary work independent of any medium and so exists in other formats such as plaintext on [gopher](gopher.md), one long pdf document, one long HTML document, collection of markdown files etc.
- plus much more :)
Over time, being written solely by drummyfish without much self censorship and "language filtering", the wiki also became something like drummyfish's raw brain dump with all the thoughts and moods averaged over the time span of writing the wiki -- reading through it makes you see relatively faithfully how drummyfish internally thinks (e.g. you see anticapitalist rants everywhere because these annoying thoughts are just constantly bothering drummyfish, whatever he's thinking about) -- this can make many people vomit but it's a kind of experiment and some even liked it, so it stays up. No one is forced to read it and CC0 ensures anyone can shape it into anything better hopefully.
The wiki can also additionally be seen as a dirty collection of drummyfish's cheatsheets, links, code snippets, [jokes](jokes.md), attempts at [ASCII art](ascii_art.md), vent rants etcetc. So the whole thing is like a digital swamp that one might see as a kind of retarded [art](art.md) that combines many things together: technical, cultural, personal, objective and subjective, beautiful and ugly. It might also be viewed as a shitpost or [meme](meme.md) taken too far. It's just its own thing.
It's also possible to see the wiki as a (somewhat dirty but constantly improving) collection of drummyfish's cheatsheets, links, code snippets, [jokes](jokes.md), attempts at [ASCII art](ascii_art.md), vents etcetc. More than a digital garden it's a digital swamp, maybe someone could say it's a sort of retarded [art](art.md) that mixes together various subjects: technical, cultural, personal, objective and subjective truths, [beautiful](beauty.md) and ugly things. Others might view it as a shitpost or [meme](meme.md) taken too far. It's just its own thing.
The wiki is similar to and was inspired by other wikis and similar works, for example in its topics and technical aspects it is similar to the earliest (plain HTML) versions of [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) and [wikiwikiweb](wikiwikiweb.md). In tone and political incorrectness it is similar to [Encyclopedia Dramatica](dramatica.md), but unlike Dramatica LRS is a "serious" project.
The wiki is similar to and was inspired by similar works, for example similarity could be found with the earliest (plain HTML) versions of [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md), also perhaps [wikiwikiweb](wikiwikiweb.md), [Jargon file](jargon_file.md) etc. In tone and political incorrectness it is more like [Encyclopedia Dramatica](dramatica.md), but unlike Dramatica LRS is a "serious" project, albeit with humor and [jokes](jokes.md) here and there.
**Technology "powering" LRS wiki** is plain and simple, it uses no frameworks or static site generators, the wiki is currently written as a collection of [Markdown](markdown.md) files that use a few [shell scripts](shell_script.md) that convert the whole thing to HTML for the web (and can also produce txt and pdf version of it), i.e. it doesn't use any wiki engine or bloated static site generator. There is a plan to maybe rewrite the wiki in [comun](comun.md).
Is LRS is wiki as based as [encyclopedia dramatica](dramatica.md)? That's the big question. One thing is for sure though, you will probably find LRS wiki being actually online :)
**Technology "powering" LRS wiki** is plain and simple, it uses no frameworks or static site generators, the wiki is currently written as a collection of [Markdown](markdown.md) files that use a few [shell scripts](shell_script.md) that convert the whole thing to [HTML](html.md) for the web (and can also produce txt and pdf version), i.e. it doesn't use any wiki engine or bloated static site generators.
## See Also

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

2
oop.md
View file

@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
*"I invented the term 'object oriented' and [C++](cpp.md) was not what I had in mind"* --[Alan Kay](alan_kay.md), inventor of OOP
Object-oriented programming (OOP, also object-obsessed programming, objectfuscated programming, capital-oriented programming, POO or artificial inelegance) is a [programming paradigm](paradigm.md) that tries to model reality as a collection of abstract objects that communicate with each other and obey some specific rules. While the idea itself isn't bad and can be useful in certain cases and while pure OOP in very old languages like [Smalltalk](smalltalk.md) may have even been quite elegant, by later adoption by [capitalist businesses](capitalist_software.md) the concept has been extremely twisted and degenerated to unreal levels -- **OOP has become extremely overused, extremely badly implemented and downright forced in programming languages** that nowadays try to apply this [abstraction](abstraction.md) to every single program and concept, creating [anti-patterns](anti_pattern.md), unnecessary issues and of course greatly significant amounts of [bloat](bloat.md). [We](lrs.md) therefore see the OOP of today as a **[cancer](cancer.md) of programming**. OOP was basically a software development fashion wave that scarred the industry for decades, it has poisoned minds of several generations. Nowadays despite OOP still keeping many fans the critical stance towards it isn't even controversial anymore, many others have voiced the criticism over and over, usually the most competent programmers like [Richard Stallman](rms.md) and [Linus Torvalds](torvalds.md) and groups like [suckless](suckless.md) and [bitreich](bitreich.md). Ugly examples of OOP gone bad include [Java](java.md) and [C++](cpp.md) (which at least doesn't force it). Other languages such as [Python](python.md) and [Javascript](javascript.md) include OOP but have lightened it up a bit and at least allow you to avoid using it. You should probably learn OOP but only to see why it's bad (and to actually understand 99% of code written nowadays). Stop objectifying programs!
Object-oriented programming (OOP, also object-obsessed programming, objectfuscated programming, capital-oriented programming, POO, class struggle or artificial inelegance) is a [programming paradigm](paradigm.md) that tries to model reality as a collection of abstract objects that communicate with each other and obey some specific rules. { In Spanish it is literally abbreviated POO. ~drummyfish } While the idea itself isn't bad and can be useful in certain cases and while pure OOP in very old languages like [Smalltalk](smalltalk.md) may have even been quite elegant, by later adoption by [capitalist businesses](capitalist_software.md) the concept has been extremely twisted and degenerated to unreal levels -- **OOP has become extremely overused, extremely badly implemented and downright forced in programming languages** that nowadays try to apply this [abstraction](abstraction.md) to every single program and concept, creating [anti-patterns](anti_pattern.md), unnecessary issues and of course greatly significant amounts of [bloat](bloat.md). [We](lrs.md) therefore see the OOP of today as a **[cancer](cancer.md) of programming**. OOP was basically a software development fashion wave that scarred the industry for decades, it has poisoned minds of several generations. Nowadays despite OOP still keeping many fans the critical stance towards it isn't even controversial anymore, many others have voiced the criticism over and over, usually the most competent programmers like [Richard Stallman](rms.md) and [Linus Torvalds](torvalds.md) and groups like [suckless](suckless.md) and [bitreich](bitreich.md). Ugly examples of OOP gone bad include [Java](java.md) and [C++](cpp.md) (which at least doesn't force it). Other languages such as [Python](python.md) and [Javascript](javascript.md) include OOP but have lightened it up a bit and at least allow you to avoid using it. You should probably learn OOP but only to see why it's bad (and to actually understand 99% of code written nowadays). Stop objectifying programs!
**A [real life](irl.md) analogy** to give a bit of high level overview: the original [Smalltalk](smalltalk.md) style OOP was kind of like when society invented [democracy](democracy.md) -- a simple idea which everyone understands (we are 10 cavemen, let's just vote on stuff mkay?) that's many times useful and works well, e.g. on a scale of a village or a small city. Then cities grew bigger (just as software did), into states and empires and the idea kept getting more and more complicated -- people just wanted to keep the democracy, apply it to everything and scale it indefinitely, but for that they had to add more complexity, they implemented representatives, parliaments, senates, presidents, vicepresidents, ministers, judges, more and more bureaucracy, hybrid ideas (free market, controlled economy, ...), corruption and inefficiencies crept in, the system degenerated into what we have today -- a hugely expensive paperworking machine that's exploited and hacked, with laws so complicated no one really understands them, with [magic](magic.md), randomness and unpredictability, producing just waste and bullshit, crumbling under own weight. This is also the way OOP went -- they started inventing static classes/methods, abstract classes/methods, multiple inheritances, interfaces, design patterns, overriding, hybrid paradigms and so on until we ended up with ugly abominations on which today's technology stands. Now a few things have to be noted. Firstly these abominations are a disaster, they came from our mistake of taking the original simple idea (simple small scale voting democracy) and saying "let's make this the only thing in the world and let's scale it a million times!" Such idea is stupid from the start and there is no doubt about that. However another evil is that people are taught to do everything this way -- today's programmers will use the mainstream OOP everywhere, even in simple programs, they don't even think about if they should, they are simply taught "always use this". This is like in real life wanting to govern a family by having elections each year to vote for the head of the family, then having members of family vote for other members of the family to be their representatives that will talk for them (the same kind of craziness as wanting to strictly respect encapsulation even in trivial programs), then if someone wants to buy anything he has to ask for a budget several months in advance and have others vote on it while an elected anti corruption committee is watching etcetc. This kind of insanity is what's normal in software nowadays. Now the only sane discussion can be had only about the usefulness and scope of the original, simple idea (simple voting in small groups, simple pure OOP) and here we say that it may be good, but only applied to just some specific situations, i.e. we say simple OOP is good for some problems but not all, just like voting is a good solution to some problems (e.g. a group of friends deciding where to go party), but not all (e.g. passengers in a car voting on which way to steer and which pedals to press).

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load diff

View file

@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- loves to wear latex
- women (lesbian) are masculine, ugly with short pink hair
- **[men](man.md)**:
- direct, strong, decisive, stubborn, overconfident, primitive, when provoked may easily be rude and aggressive, beat their wives
- direct, strong, decisive, stubborn, overconfident, primitive, conservative, when provoked may easily become rude and aggressive, beat their wives
- [competitive](competition.md)
- good at [math](math.md) and exact sciences, often on detriment of being good at art, humanities and "soft skills" (these are seen as gay)
- hide their feelings, trash talk ever best friends, revealing feminine emotions is seen as a weakness and sign of [homosexuality](gay.md)

View file

@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ Is trans politics OK? No, it's [fascism](fascism.md). Stop posting fascist [flag
**See the difference between being transsexual and being a fascist under a transsexual flag.** It's exactly the same as being white versus being a white supremacist. Stop posting shitty flags, stop being [proud](pride.md) of your disease, [race](race.md) or any other kind of condition.
Is it OK to be German? Yes, of course, Is it OK to be a [Nazi](nazi.md)? No, that's fascism.
Is it OK to be German? Yes, of course. Is it OK to be a [Nazi](nazi.md)? No, that's fascism.
Hopefully that's enough examples to demonstrate the difference. Really you must see it even if with a quarter of average [IQ](iq.md), only extreme brainwashing can possibly make you not see the difference. You know this is the voice of reason and you know tranny fascism is a voice of cult, you know listening to one means doing the right thing and listening to the other doing the cowardly conformance to evil. You can choose to be good or evil.
@ -23,9 +23,10 @@ Hopefully that's enough examples to demonstrate the difference. Really you must
- **Extreme brainwashing at very young age.** Imagine you are 8 or 10 years old and all you do all day is watch transsexual YouTubers, ads, cartoons with transsexual characters, movies with transsexual heroes, you see transsexual marching in streets under transsexual flags, you see them in games you play, just everywhere. In complete honesty, what do you think you will want to become? Children don't think critically, they just accept whatever role models are put in front of them. They see Pokemon, they want to be a Pokemon trainer, they see batman, they want to be a batman. LGBT fascists know this very well and exploit it to full extent. Many lives are ruined at a very young age, many will end up committing [suicides](suicide.md). Is it even possible to imagine anything more evil?
- **It is a [fashion](fashion.md).** Very simple, it IS a fashion to be gay, sissy, transsexual, mentally ill and "queer". Just like everyone was a disco fan in the [80s](80s.md) and like everyone was an [emo](emo.md) in 2000s, is it surprising at all that young people follow a fashion? If you're straight, with no mental illness, no self harm scars, wearing normal clothes, you are just plain and simple BORING, unpopular, won't ever have sex, friends and may even become bullied. Do you in your right mind think anyone young ever wants this? However the trans fashion has a catch: it comes with serious irreversible decisions, such as that to have your dick cut off, often made at a time when you don't even know how children are made yet.
- **Many social rewards.** For example: **label of a [hero](hero_culture.md)** for coming out; attention, which means followers, fame and **financial rewards** on social media; more potential for generating drama, i.e. again more attention capital, meaning more money etc.; **better chances to get hired** as companies have quotas to hire minorities and similar kinds of people and they're generally scared of discrimination lawsuits; **safety** from getting bullied by [LGBT](lgbt.md), [feminists](feminism.md) and other pseudoleftist fascist groups for having joined their ranks (just like "communist" collaborators used to get an immunity, protection and privileges for signing collaboration with the "communist" party); **better chances in lawsuits** as you gain the powerful "discrimination card" to play (and as a result even lowering probability of getting sued at all); support, compassion and empathy of your surroundings for having an "illness"; excuse for behaving badly ("he is ill, it's not his fault"), healthcare benefits such as a disability pension; business opportunities, e.g. for being a writer, speaker etc. Is it surprising at all that when something is socially rewarded, people start doing it? You would have to be stupid beyond any measure to even find this surprising in a slightest way.
- **[Gay](gay.md) parents**. Parents are probably the single most influential factor for the development of any child, to the child a parent is role model of what it wants to be as an adult. Both a normal mother and normal father are important and irreplaceable. If a small boy doesn't have normal father but has two mommies or two feminine sissy daddies, both similarly disastrous options, what do you think will get forever burned in its subconsciousness at this critical development stage? Where is it supposed to learn about how men behave, how they talk, how they think of women, what they do in the privacy of their home? The sad little motherfucker is doomed for life and it's not even his fault, it's as if the child is denied basic education or not being taught to talk -- it will adapt to life somehow but will never catch up with what it missed and will suffer until his death for the mistakes of his parents. It must be sad that gay parents are the most selfish people in the world, they want to have children like everyone else, not caring about the fact they will ruin the child's life.
- Males get minus points from feminism, females get plus points, therefore more people want to be female.
- Herd mentality, mass hysteria. People just [do what others do](monkey_see_monkey_do.md) without thinking because they're stupid, spreading this further and further.
- Females that that made the huge mistake of transitioning to a male very quickly find life as a male is much more difficult, contrary to what feminist propaganda told them, and they quickly revert back.
- Females that made the huge mistake of transitioning to a male very quickly find life as a male is much more difficult, contrary to what feminist propaganda told them, and they quickly revert back.
- ...
So the question is rather: why are you NOT a transsexual yet?

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

View file

@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
- number of articles: 602
- number of commits: 908
- total size of all texts in bytes: 4495479
- total number of lines of article texts: 34035
- number of commits: 909
- total size of all texts in bytes: 4498195
- total number of lines of article texts: 34041
- number of script lines: 294
- occurrences of the word "person": 9
- occurrences of the word "nigger": 98
@ -15,8 +15,8 @@ longest articles:
- [c_tutorial](c_tutorial.md): 124K
- [exercises](exercises.md): 112K
- [capitalism](capitalism.md): 76K
- [chess](chess.md): 76K
- [how_to](how_to.md): 72K
- [chess](chess.md): 72K
- [less_retarded_society](less_retarded_society.md): 64K
- [3d_rendering](3d_rendering.md): 56K
- [faq](faq.md): 56K
@ -35,60 +35,76 @@ longest articles:
top 50 5+ letter words:
- which (2523)
- which (2524)
- there (1940)
- people (1776)
- people (1775)
- example (1528)
- other (1403)
- number (1262)
- other (1404)
- number (1264)
- about (1234)
- software (1208)
- program (994)
- because (972)
- their (950)
- their (952)
- would (922)
- being (866)
- being (867)
- something (861)
- things (854)
- called (852)
- things (855)
- called (853)
- language (849)
- numbers (808)
- simple (797)
- computer (780)
- without (752)
- computer (779)
- without (754)
- programming (730)
- function (717)
- different (711)
- these (706)
- these (707)
- however (706)
- system (665)
- world (655)
- world (656)
- should (638)
- doesn (637)
- while (627)
- point (616)
- games (612)
- still (601)
- games (614)
- still (602)
- society (596)
- drummyfish (595)
- using (575)
- simply (574)
- possible (571)
- possible (572)
- though (557)
- https (551)
- course (544)
- similar (541)
- memory (530)
- similar (542)
- memory (531)
- always (526)
- basically (515)
- basically (519)
- probably (514)
- value (513)
- technology (512)
- probably (512)
- really (508)
latest changes:
```
Date: Wed Oct 23 20:14:11 2024 +0200
3d_model.md
4chan.md
chess.md
drummyfish.md
jokes.md
lmao.md
magic.md
money.md
random_page.md
smallchesslib.md
sorting.md
stereotype.md
wiki_pages.md
wiki_stats.md
wizard.md
Date: Tue Oct 22 21:15:37 2024 +0200
4chan.md
90s.md
@ -106,22 +122,6 @@ Date: Tue Oct 22 21:15:37 2024 +0200
Date: Mon Oct 21 15:31:36 2024 +0200
90s.md
chess.md
drummyfish.md
fail_ab.md
how_to.md
main.md
often_confused.md
random_page.md
science.md
wiki_pages.md
wiki_stats.md
work.md
Date: Sat Oct 19 22:01:36 2024 +0200
90s.md
backgammon.md
cancer.md
chess.md
diogenes.md
```
most wanted pages: