Update

capitalism.md

@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ If we continue along the lines of the valid analogy between capitalism and [canc
 
 { There is a famous 1988 movie called *They Live* which, while being a funny alines'n'stuff B movie, actually deeply analyzes and criticizes capitalism and for its accurate predictions of the future we now live in became a cult classic. It's been famously said that *They Live* is rather a documentary. I highly recommend giving it a watch. Also the 1985 movie Brazil is excellent. ~drummyfish }
 
+Capitalists themselves are soulless, empty shells incapable of true human emotion, the lowest subhuman scum, a pinnacle of evolutionary degeneracy, born to only seek pleasure for themselves while masking it as "doing good", they're masters of pretense, manipulation and lie, they lack capability to think about anything else than how to get more and more self pleasure and this constant thinking about this single goal makes them in fact perfect it, they're dangerous by possessing human level of reasoning and looking like humans while lacking any human feelings except for endless greed.
+
 ## Attributes Of Capitalism
 
 The following is a list of just SOME attributes of capitalism -- note that not all of them are present in initial stages but capitalism will always converge towards them.

crypto.md

@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ But how do we know which one is the "official" blockchain? Can't just people sta
 - [proof of work](proof_of_work.md): For a block to be confirmed it has to have a specific cryptographic puzzle solved, e.g. it may need to have appended some string that makes the block's hash some predetermined value. Participants try to solve this puzzle: finding the string is difficult and has to be done by [brute force](brute_force.md) (which wastes electricity and makes this method controversial). Once someone finds a solution, the block is confirmed and the solver gets a reward in coin -- this is therefore called **mining**.
 - [proof of stake](proof_of_stake.md): This methods tries to waste less energy by not solving cryptographics puzzles but rather having some chosen participants validate/confirm the blocks. Basically participants can give some of their money at stake which then gives them a chance (proportional to the amount of money put at stake) to be chosen as validators. A validator is then chosen at random who will check the transactions and sign the block. For this they will get a small reward in coins. If they try to confirm fraudulent transactions (e.g. money sent from people without any money), the network will punish them by taking away the money they put at stake (so there is a financial motivation to not "cheat").
 
-Can't people just forge transactions, e.g. by sending out a record that says someone else sent them money? This can be easily prevented by [digitally signing](digital_signature.md) the transactions, i.e. if there is e.g. a transaction "A sends 1 coint to B", it has to be signed by A to confirm that A really intended to send the money. But can't someone just copy-paste someone else's already signed transactions and try to perform them multiple times? This can also be prevented by e.g. numbering the transactions, i.e. recording something like "A sent 1 coin to B as his 1st transaction".
+Can't people just forge transactions, e.g. by sending out a record that says someone else sent them money? This can be easily prevented by [digitally signing](digital_signature.md) the transactions, i.e. if there is e.g. a transaction "A sends 1 coin to B", it has to be signed by A to confirm that A really intended to send the money. But can't someone just copy-paste someone else's already signed transactions and try to perform them multiple times? This can also be prevented by e.g. numbering the transactions, i.e. recording something like "A sent 1 coin to B as his 1st transaction".
 
 But where are one's coins actually stored? They're not explicitly stored anywhere; the amount of coins any participant has is deduced from the list of transactions, i.e. if it is known someone joined the network with 0 coins and there is a record of someone else sending him 1 coin, it is clear he now has 1 coin. For end users there are so called **wallets** which to them appear to store their coins, but a wallet is in fact just the set of cryptographic keys needed to perform transactions.
 

egoism.md

@@ -11,7 +11,7 @@ Some signs of egoism include:
 - **[Assertiveness](assertiveness.md)**.
 - **Giving oneself special names**. Making a quick Internet handle is cool for practical purposes, inventing an artistic name or even changing it legally is just an inflated ego.
 - **Talking about oneself too much**, turning any conversation into a conversation about himself, signs of this include for example starting sentences with "As an X, I think ..."; as in "As a professional game designer I think ...".
-- **Being a [capitalist](capitalism.md)**; by definition a capitalist only cares about himself, capitalist is incapable of love or wanting any benefit for anyone else than himself, he only benefits others if he sees it will somehow lead to his own benefit in the future (this applies even to for example to caring about his own family etc.).
+- **Being a [capitalist](capitalism.md)**; by definition a capitalist only cares about himself, the only true value for him is self interest and he thinks that all other values stem from it (that's fundamentally why he accepts capitalism, he believes everyone thinks like that), hence capitalist is incapable of [love](love.md) or wanting any benefit for anyone else than himself, he can only ever pretend to do so if he sees it will benefit him in some way, he will only benefit others if he sees it will somehow lead to his own benefit in the future (this applies even to for example to caring about his own family etc.).
 - **Using licenses that require giving credit**, such as [CC-BY-SA](cc_by_sa.md).
 - **Arriving late (bad timekeeping)**: by arriving late you're wasting the time of others and saving your own time, implying you think your time is more important, it's basically the same as physically beating someone. A good man will plan to arrive at least half an hour earlier so that even if he gets late, he'll still be on time, and if by some extreme miracle he still arrives late, he must pay the other one money or give him some other gift, for example free sex in case of woman.
 - **"Personal pronouns".** Also inventing weird sexes and identities for oneself.

how_to.md

@@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ This is a summary of some main guidelines on how an LRS supporter should behave
 - **Do NOT [fight](fight_culture.md)**, do NOT say you fight something. Fighting and rhetoric centered around "fighting something" is part of harmful [fight culture](fight_culture.md), most people don't even realize they take part in it. It is important to unlearn this. We do not want to defeat anyone, we want to convince by means of rationality, nonviolence and love. However note that what is unacceptable to do to a living being may be completely acceptable to do to non living object (for example destroying a corporation is OK, in fact it is very desirable). We often take actions that common people would call a "fight" (for example we may organize a strike), however it is important that we don't call it a fight -- a point of view is sometimes as important as the action itself as it will determine our future direction. Remember that [naming is important](name_is_important.md). **Watch out for [A/B fails](fail_ab.md)**.
 - **Do NOT worship or create [heroes](hero_culture.md), don't become one**. Watch out for [cult of personality](cult_of_personality.md). It is another common mistake to for example call [Richard Stallman](rms.md) a "hero of free software" and to even worship him as a celebrity. The concept of a hero is [harmful](harmful.md), rightist concept that is connected to war mentality, it goes against [anarchist](anarchism.md) principles, it creates social hierarchy and given some people a power to deceive. People are imperfect and make mistake -- only ideas can be perfect. Respect people but don't make anyone your moral compass, you should rather subscribe to specific ideas, i.e. rather than worshipping Stallman subscribe to and promote his idea of [free software](free_software.md).
 - **Do not [identify](identity.md) with specific groups and organizations** -- this one is tricky because there is a fine line between many people together agreeing on an idea (good) and those people creating a formal hierarchical group which sooner or later inevitably becomes [fascist](fascism.md) or at the very least corrupt, eventually to the degree of betraying its original beliefs (bad). Remember principles of [anarchism](anarchism.md): loosely associate with others but do not create power structures and hierarchies. An example here may be supporting [free software](free_software.md) (good) vs supporting the (now greatly corrupt) [Free Software Foundation](fsf.md) (bad). Free software as an idea is pure and good, in merely supporting the idea we will not create any hierarchy of people, power structures or attach other unrelated ideas to ride on the free software wave (e.g. that of [political correctness](political_correctness.md) now promoted by the FSF). They say there is strength in unity, that is true, but there are different kinds of unity, and if perhaps one kind of unity (the bad one) is momentarily stronger, it is so because it's the "dark side of the force": yes, it may be stronger, but it is evil. Resist this urge. For this we also don't want to start any formal [LRS](lrs.md) group.
-- **CREATE, do NOT waste your life on [bullshit](bullshit.md), do NOT get too obsessed with tools and hopping** such as [distrohopping](distrohopping.md), [githopping](githopping.md) [audiophilia](audiophilia.md), hardware consumerism, 100% minimalist perfectionism etc. The perfect is the enemy of the good. Remember, the goal of your life is to create something new and better; too many people just get stuck doing nothing but switch distros, rant about which editor is best, making sure their OS has zero bloat and zero proprietary code etc. If that's all you do, it's completely useless, your life is completely wasted. Dedicate time to creating art that will last, e.g. programming [LRS](lrs.md) (creating source code text) or making free cultural art -- it doesn't matter whether you create it with Ubuntu or Gentoo.
+- **Stop [working](work.md); rather CREATE, do NOT waste your life on [bullshit](bullshit.md), do NOT get too obsessed with tools and hopping** such as [distrohopping](distrohopping.md), [githopping](githopping.md) [audiophilia](audiophilia.md), hardware consumerism, 100% minimalist perfectionism etc. The perfect is the enemy of the good. Remember, the goal of your life is to create something new and better; too many people just get stuck doing nothing but switch distros, rant about which editor is best, making sure their OS has zero bloat and zero proprietary code etc. If that's all you do, it's completely useless, your life is completely wasted. Dedicate time to creating art that will last, e.g. programming [LRS](lrs.md) (creating source code text) or making free cultural art -- it doesn't matter whether you create it with Ubuntu or Gentoo. **Inspiration exists, but it must never catch you working** -- if inspiration comes when you're doing slavery, you have to forget about it to keep doing the slavery and the inspiration is lost, so avoid work as much as possible to be ready when inspiration comes.
 - **Lead an example**, this is the best way to spread our values, however be also extremely careful not to become a worshipped [authority](hero_culture.md). Know the difference between a humble intellectual authority and an authoritative self-centered celebrity who uses his fame for deception. The more famous you are, the more humble you should become.
 - **Be [loving](love.md), even towards opposition** -- remember: hate and revenge towards people perpetuates the endless circle. [Love](love.md) leads to more love, understanding, good deeds, friendship, happiness, collaboration and all the other positive things. **Do not confuse love with [political correctness](political_correctness.md)**. You may get angry or frustrated, just don't get violent against, rather try to break something, write your anger out, play some video game etc.
 - **Don't be [politically correct](political_correctness.md)**, never use gender neutral pronouns (always use "he" as the default pronoun), don't be afraid to say forbidden words like [nigger](nigger.md), never use any [code of coercion](coc.md), "personal pronouns" etc. Even if you think you're moderate in views and that it "can't hurt" to just "play along" a little bit, IT DOES HURT, you are approving of fascism and carrying its flag, remember that Nazism only got so big thanks to a nation of moderate people who just "played along" to avoid trouble. There is always only very few true extremists, a great evil relies on masses of people who just want to get by and will make no trouble in conforming. Remember that staying silent often means supporting status quo, so the more deceit you see in society, the more you should try to not stay silent and the more you should try to tell the truth.

jokes.md

@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ Also remember the worst thing you can do to a joke is put a [disclaimer](disclai
 - Today in [Women](woman.md)'s Chess News we are looking at this awesome game with a brilliant king sacrifice.
 - If man speaks in the forest and there is no [woman](woman.md) around to hear him, is he still wrong?
 - Hey I won a box with lifetime supply of condoms in an [assembly](assembly.md) programming competition! Turns out the box was just empty.
-- There's a new trend on [TikTok](tiktok.md): the Russian roulette challenge. No one has won yet, they forgot to tell it's played with a revolver.
+- There's a new trend on [TikTok](tiktok.md): the Russian roulette challenge. No one has won yet, they forgot to tell them it's played with a revolver.
 - In C++ friends have access to your private members.
 - Hey, do you like podcasts? I don't need that, I have schizophrenia.
 - The new version of [Windows](windows.md) is going to be backdoor free! The backdoor will be free of charge.

lotr.md

@@ -2,5 +2,6 @@
 
 TODO
 
-**[LMAO](lmao.md) THIS IS NOT CLICKBAIT:** They don't want you to see this! On the LOTR DVD there were many and many bonuses for the movies and one of them was a humorous discussion of Ben Stiller, Vince Vaughn and Peter Jackson (Ju-DEMryNOA on [YT](yt.md)) -- in it they firstly joked about making up some sequels to milk the franchise a bit, which ummm, already happened by now (:D), BUT not just that. They also jokingly suggested making a [gay](gay.md) version of the movies AND a version with [black](black.md) characters, complete with mock up posters and shit :D It's so hilarious watching it nowadays when all of this is happening but UNIRONICALLY. I swear [SJWs](sjw.md) are going to be burning these DVDs soon, it's funny as hell. Download it and save it before it's gone.
+**A piece of recent history that's been [censored](censorship.md) from the Internet and which they don't want you to see**: In 2002 [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md) hijacked the franchise to not just blatantly milk it for money, but at the same time abuse it to spread [SJW](sjw.md) propaganda, creating an absolute garbage, soulless "spin off" series called "Rings of Power" with added [afroamerican](nigger.md) dwarves, lesbian elves and other kind of monstrosities that are an absolute dehonestation of Tolkien's art. The trailer posted on [YouTube](youtube.md) was ABSOLUTE DISASTER, with 27 million views it only gained 110 thousand likes versus 27 million dislike, making it one of the worst received videos in history, and not surprisingly so: it was just pure, blatantly showing evil. In the comment section people expressed their disgust, every single comment read the following Tolkien's quite: **"Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good"**. Youtube had to **remove the dislike** button from their site so that people could no longer express their opinion and resist evil. It's important to repeat this: people started protesting so the overlords just remove the way to protest, and people just accepted this. This event is now very much censored and very hard to find, searching for it just gives you links to the show itself. If this is not a dystopia yet, it's hard to say what is.
 
+**[LMAO](lmao.md) THIS IS NOT CLICKBAIT:** They don't want you to see this! On the LOTR DVD there were many and many bonuses for the movies and one of them was a humorous discussion of Ben Stiller, Vince Vaughn and Peter Jackson (Ju-DEMryNOA on [YT](yt.md)) -- in it they firstly joked about making up some sequels to milk the franchise a bit, which ummm, already happened by now (:D), BUT not just that. They also jokingly suggested making a [gay](gay.md) version of the movies AND a version with [black](black.md) characters, complete with mock up posters and shit :D It's so hilarious watching it nowadays when all of this is happening but UNIRONICALLY. I swear [SJWs](sjw.md) are going to be burning these DVDs soon, it's funny as hell. Download it and save it before it's gone.

nigger.md

@@ -69,4 +69,5 @@ In the [gender studies](gender_studies.md) circles there is an academic debate a
 - [mudblood](mudblood.md)
 - [no-no](nono.md)
 - the [C-word](capitalism.md)
-- the [P-word](person.md)
+- the [P-word](person.md)
+- [stereotype](stereotype.md)

often_confused.md

@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
 There are many terms that are very similar and can many times be used interchangeably. This isn't wrong per se, a slight difference may be insignificant in certain contexts and the list here may also serve as a list of synonyms to those who already know the differences. However it's important to stress it's important to know at least some of the differences for the sake of the cases where they matter. The following list tries to document some of the often confused/similar terms.
 
 - **[1D](1d.md)** vs **[2D](2d.md)** vs **[2.5D](pseudo3d.md)** vs **[3D](3d.md)** (e.g. 2D function vs 3D function, 1D raycasting vs 2D raycasting, ...)
-- **[address](address.md)** vs **[pointer](pointer.md)** vs **[reference](reference.md)** vs **[index](index.md)**
+- **[address](address.md)** vs **[pointer](pointer.md)** vs **[reference](reference.md)** vs **[index](index.md)** vs **[vector](vector.md)**
 - **[AI](ai.md)** vs **[machine learning](machine_learning.md)** vs **[neural networks](neural_net.md)**
 - **[algebra](algebra.md)** vs **[arithmetic](arithmetic.md)** vs **[math](math.md)** vs **[logic](logic.md)**
 - **[algorithm](algorithm.md)** vs **[program](program.md)** vs **[process](process.md)** vs **[heuristic](heuristic.md)** vs **[source code](source_code.md)**
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ There are many terms that are very similar and can many times be used interchang
 - **[attribution](attribution.md)** vs **[credit](credit.md)**
 - **binary** vs **[executable](executable.md)**
 - **[binary](binary.md)** vs **[boolean](boolean.md)**
+- **[binary](binary.md)** vs **[digital](digital.md)** vs **[electronic](electronics.md)**
 - **[black](black.md) [race](race.md)** vs **[nigger](nigger.md)** vs **[negro](negro.md)**
 - **[branchless](branchless.md) programming** vs **ifless programming**
 - **[brute force](brute_force.md)** vs **[heuristic search](heuristic_search.md)**
@@ -40,7 +41,7 @@ There are many terms that are very similar and can many times be used interchang
 - **[compatibility layer](compatibility_layer.md)** vs **[emulator](emulator.md)** vs **[virtual machine](vm.md)**
 - **[concurrency](concurrency.md)** vs **[parallelism](parallelism.md)** vs **[quasiparallelism](quasiparallelism.md)** vs **[distribution](distributed.md)**
 - **[conjecture](conjecture.md)** vs **[hypothesis](hypothesis.md)** vs **[theory](theory.md)** vs **[theorem](theorem.md)** vs **[lemma](lemma.md)**
-- **[constant](constant.md)** vs **[literal](literal.md)**
+- **[constant](constant.md)** vs **[literal](literal.md)** vs **immediate operand**
 - **[coding](coding.md)** vs **[programming](programming.md)** vs **[software engineering](software_engineering.md)**
 - **[codec](codec.md)** vs **[container format](container_format.md)**
 - **[coherence](coherence.md)** vs **[consistency](consistency.md)**
@@ -62,7 +63,6 @@ There are many terms that are very similar and can many times be used interchang
 - **[discretization](discretization.md)** vs **[quantization](quantization.md)**
 - **[duck typing](duck_typing.md)** vs **[weak typing](weak_typing.md)** vs **[dynamic typing](dynamic_typing.md)** vs **[no typing](untyped.md)**
 - **[digit](digit.md)** vs **[number](number.md)** vs **[value](value.md)** vs **figure** vs **numeral**
-- **[digital](digital.md)** vs **[electronic](electronics.md)**
 - **[directed acyclic graph](dag.md)** vs **[tree](tree.md)**
 - **[directory](directory.md)** vs **[folder](folder.md)**
 - **[discrete Fourier transform](dft.md)** vs **[discrete time Fourier transform](dtft.md)**
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@ There are many terms that are very similar and can many times be used interchang
 - **electronic game** vs **[video game](video_game.md)**
 - **[emoticon](emoticon.md)** vs **[emoji](emoji.md)** vs **[smiley](smiley.md)**
 - **[emulation](emulation.md)** vs **[simulation](simulation.md)**
+- **[encryption](encryption.md)** vs **[security](security.md)** vs **[privacy](privacy.md)**
 - **[entity](entity.md)** vs **[object](object.md)**
 - **[equation](equation.md)** vs **[expression](expression.md)** vs **[inequality](inequality.md)**
 - **[equivalence](equivalence.md)** vs **[implication](implication.md)**

shitword.md

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ Shitwords include the following:
 - **[assertiveness](assertiveness.md)**: fancy word for behaving like an asshole
 - **career**: linked to work, absolute conformance to the system, lifelong slavery
 - **[coding](coding.md)**: shitting out hasted, low quality code; see also *productivity*
-- **[competition](competition.md)**: root cause of absolutely all societal evil, as a social mechanism always undesirable, cause of fascism, wars, inequality, capitalism, criminality, genocide, [racism](racism.md) etcetc.
+- **[competition](competition.md)**: root cause of absolutely all societal [evil](evil.md), as a social mechanism always undesirable, cause of [fascism](fascism.md), [wars](war.md), inequality, [capitalism](capitalism.md), criminality, eventually genocide, [racism](racism.md) etcetc.
 - **[hero](hero.md)**: cult of personality, making gods out of people, distorts rational thinking with emotion, establishes social hierarchy, induces fear of disagreement, living symbol fueling fascism; see also *pride*
 - **[identity](identity_politics.md)**: basis of [fascism](fascism.md), [egoism](egoism.md), self-obsession, fashion, bullshit
 - **[justice](justice.md)**: means revenge, anger, violence; incompatible with forgiveness
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ Shitwords include the following:
 - **problematic**: used by [SJWs](sjw.md) to euphemistically mark something or someone for [canceling](cancel_culture.md) and/or [censorship](censorship.md)
 - **[productivity](productivity_cult.md)**: materialism, [capitalist](capitalism.md) cult of constantly producing for its own sake, making people into robots, judging worth of people by how much they can produce, putting quantity before quality, production before any other values such as mental health; spawns fanatic religious cults
 - **[progress](progress.md)**: aiming only for novelty, endless growth for its own sake ([cancer](cancer.md)), not for [good](good.md)
+- **protection**: [fight culture](fight_culture.md) term, usually euphemism for [censorship](censorship.md), [surveillance](surveillance.md), giving up [freedom](freedom.md), establishing police states, punishments, suggesting [fear](fear_culture.md) of being "attacked" etc.
 - **responsibility**: punishment (even if only internal, psychological) for bad behavior, based on guilt, limits freedom
 - **[revolution](revolution.md)**: means violence, hysteria, war, angry mob, blind destruction of anything old, guillotines and bloodshed
 - **(human/legal) [right](rights_culture.md)**: establishes that "what's not explicitly allowed is forbidden", increases reliance on [law](law.md), makes basic freedoms into privileges, makes people slaves to constant activism; "right" is often used to mean "restriction" (as in [copyright](copyright.md) etc.)

wiki_stats.md

@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
 This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
 
 - number of articles: 606
-- number of commits: 921
-- total size of all texts in bytes: 4589722
-- total number of lines of article texts: 34491
+- number of commits: 922
+- total size of all texts in bytes: 4604238
+- total number of lines of article texts: 34519
 - number of script lines: 294
 - occurrences of the word "person": 9
 - occurrences of the word "nigger": 99
@@ -35,60 +35,79 @@ longest articles:
 
 top 50 5+ letter words:
 
-- which (2551)
-- there (1983)
-- people (1822)
-- example (1554)
-- other (1434)
-- number (1276)
-- about (1260)
+- which (2563)
+- there (1991)
+- people (1833)
+- example (1560)
+- other (1440)
+- number (1277)
+- about (1266)
 - software (1214)
-- program (1002)
-- because (997)
-- their (974)
-- would (942)
-- being (894)
-- something (885)
-- things (872)
-- called (864)
-- language (851)
+- program (1010)
+- because (1004)
+- their (980)
+- would (948)
+- something (898)
+- being (895)
+- things (876)
+- called (867)
+- language (854)
 - numbers (811)
-- simple (801)
-- computer (799)
-- without (770)
-- programming (736)
-- different (725)
-- however (724)
-- function (721)
-- these (718)
+- simple (808)
+- computer (806)
+- without (775)
+- programming (743)
+- however (729)
+- different (727)
+- function (722)
+- these (721)
 - world (674)
-- system (670)
-- doesn (650)
+- system (671)
+- doesn (652)
 - should (647)
 - while (634)
-- still (626)
-- games (626)
+- games (629)
+- still (627)
 - point (619)
-- drummyfish (609)
+- drummyfish (613)
 - society (600)
-- simply (595)
+- simply (596)
 - possible (586)
-- using (580)
-- https (557)
-- though (556)
-- course (551)
+- using (581)
+- though (558)
+- https (558)
+- always (554)
+- course (552)
 - similar (546)
-- always (546)
-- probably (532)
-- memory (531)
-- basically (530)
-- really (522)
-- technology (519)
-- value (515)
+- basically (538)
+- probably (535)
+- memory (535)
+- really (525)
+- technology (520)
+- value (517)
 
 latest changes:
 
 ```
+Date:   Thu Nov 14 20:34:08 2024 +0100
+  algorithm.md
+  ashley_jones.md
+  chess.md
+  drummyfish.md
+  faq.md
+  jokes.md
+  lmao.md
+  main.md
+  minimalism.md
+  nigger.md
+  oop.md
+  racism.md
+  random_page.md
+  stereotype.md
+  turing_machine.md
+  wiki_pages.md
+  wiki_stats.md
+  wikipedia.md
 Date:   Wed Nov 13 01:37:31 2024 +0100
   4chan.md
   ashley_jones.md
@@ -109,25 +128,6 @@ Date:   Wed Nov 13 01:37:31 2024 +0100
   pascal.md
   pedophilia.md
   programming_language.md
-  race.md
-  random_page.md
-  rust.md
-  shit.md
-  shitword.md
-  soyence.md
-  steganography.md
-  stereotype.md
-  tool_slave.md
-  wiki_pages.md
-  wiki_stats.md
-  woman.md
-Date:   Fri Nov 8 15:12:10 2024 +0100
-  chess.md
-  disease.md
-  doom.md
-  english.md
-  football.md
-  furry.md
 ```
 
 most wanted pages:
@@ -156,30 +156,30 @@ most wanted pages:
 most popular and lonely pages:
 
 - [lrs](lrs.md) (314) 
-- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (259) 
-- [c](c.md) (232) 
-- [bloat](bloat.md) (224) 
+- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (262) 
+- [c](c.md) (233) 
+- [bloat](bloat.md) (225) 
 - [free_software](free_software.md) (189) 
 - [game](game.md) (145) 
 - [suckless](suckless.md) (144) 
 - [proprietary](proprietary.md) (129) 
 - [minimalism](minimalism.md) (111) 
+- [computer](computer.md) (106) 
 - [modern](modern.md) (105) 
-- [computer](computer.md) (105) 
 - [censorship](censorship.md) (104) 
 - [fun](fun.md) (101) 
 - [kiss](kiss.md) (100) 
-- [math](math.md) (97) 
+- [math](math.md) (98) 
 - [gnu](gnu.md) (96) 
-- [programming](programming.md) (94) 
+- [programming](programming.md) (95) 
 - [linux](linux.md) (94) 
 - [shit](shit.md) (91) 
 - [bullshit](bullshit.md) (89) 
 - [hacking](hacking.md) (88) 
 - [fight_culture](fight_culture.md) (88) 
 - [less_retarded_society](less_retarded_society.md) (84) 
+- [corporation](corporation.md) (84) 
 - [free_culture](free_culture.md) (83) 
-- [corporation](corporation.md) (83) 
 - [art](art.md) (83) 
 - [woman](woman.md) (82) 
 - [public_domain](public_domain.md) (82) 

woman.md

@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@ The symbol for woman is a circle with cross at its bottom ([Unicode](unicode.md)
 
 [Historically](history.md) in every [culture](culture.md) women have been privileged over men, and they still are: being a woman means playing life on low difficult (women for example commit [suicides](suicide.md) much less often, much less frequently end up being homeless and so on) -- while men always had to [work](work.md) their asses off, go to [wars](war.md), explore and hunt for food, women often weren't even supposed to work, they could stay at home, chill while guarding the fire and playing with children -- this is becoming less and less so with [capitalism](capitalism.md) which aims to simply enslave everyone, nowadays mostly through the [feminist](feminism.md) cult that brainwashed women to desire the same slavery as men. In case of emergencies it's always been the rule to save women and children first, in wars women and children were oftentimes spared in mass executions. Thanks to being smaller, thinner and lighter women need fewer calories to survive, i.e. men have to pay more money just for staying alive (Does anyone care about this inequality gap? Of course not). Statistically **women live about 6 years longer lives than men** because they have easier and less stressful life, they don't have to work as hard and they can obtain privileges (such as free food and better healthcare) just with a flirty smile. Woman make much more money by prostitution than men, why don't evil women discriminate against poor men this way? While feminists are furious about wage gaps in professions where men make more money than women, none gives a single damn about these opposite kinds of inequality gaps which just confirms what everyone already knows: feminists don't care about equality, they simply care about women. Women also have the huge social privilege of being able to to have sex and/or get a partner at any time with no effort and/or **trade sex (or even just mere company) for things and services** -- this happens very often, see e.g. the [GamerGate](gamergate.md) scandal which basically revealed that women "developers" were fucking game reviewers to push promotion of their "games", i.e. here we see that **women oppress men** not just by treating them as mere sexual objects but also by having good games made by men be rejected in favor of bad games made by women by the power of sex. Being a woman means playing life on very low difficulty, you can have anything you want at any time. Man on the other hand won't get sex unless he's a billionaire or at least 2 meters tall, no matter how smart, nice of physically fit he is. For a woman to get sex it's enough to just ask while not weighting two tons, that's literally how easy it is. It is proven that taller men have more sexual partners which means women are discriminating against short men: why are women so evil and practice [body shaming](body_shaming.md)? Didn't they want equality or something?
 
+[Fun](fun.md) fact: in [Czechia](czechia.md) it is literally a folk tradition to beat women on Easter, for which the woman must give the man who beat her a treat, it's called Pomlazka, or Easter whip in [English](english.md), look it up :D
+
 Women also can't drive, operate machines, they can't compare even to the worst men in sports, both physical and mental such as [chess](chess.md). Women have to have separate leagues and more relaxed rules, e.g. the title Woman Grand Master (WGM) in chess has far lower requirements to obtain than regular Grand Master (GM). (According to [Elo](elo.md) rating the best woman chess player in history would have only 8% chance of winning against current best male who would have 48% chance of winning). On the International Mathematical Olympiad only 43 out of 1338 medals were obtained by females. There are too many funny cases and video compilations of women facing men in sports (watch them before they're censored lol), e.g. the infamous Vaevictis female "progaming" team or the [football](football.md) match between the US national women team (probably the best women team in the world) vs some random under 15 years old boy's team which of course the women team lost. LMAO there is even a video of 1 skinny boy beating 9 women in boxing. Of course there are arguments that worse performance of women in mental sports is caused culturally; women aren't led so much to playing chess, therefore there are fewer women in chess and so the probability of a good woman player appearing is lower. There may be a small part of truth to this but in the end it's most definitely just an excuse to cover up the fact that women don't play chess (and aren't encouraged to do so) simply because they're not naturally good at it. Do chimpanzees lack the ability to read because we "oppress" them by not installing bookshelves into their zoo exhibits? Take a look at [Jews](jew.md): they are a minority, one that's been under extremely heavy oppression, even that of genocide, and they still managed to grab the highest ranks in society and basically win the capitalist game. Nowadays, in [21st century](21st_century.md), women are no longer oppressed, on the contrary they now get social privileges, encouragement, all the handholding and support -- where are the female chess geniuses then? Where are the female Einsteins? Not even with all the support in the world can they get to the level of men (note that [eventually](future.md), out of necessity, feminism WILL resort to crippling men and forging data to make it look like females beat men, but that will indeed be just pure lies). And still, no matter the cause, the fact simply stands that women are generally worse than men at mental activities -- a randomly picked man will most likely be better at chess than a randomly picked woman, and that's what matters in the end. Also if women are displaced from chess by culture, then what is the area they are displaced to? If women are as capable as men, then for any area dominated by men there should be an area equally dominated by women, however we see that anywhere men face women men win big time, even in the woman activities such as cooking and fashion design. Feminists will say that men simply oppress women everywhere, but this just means that women are dominated by men everywhere, which means they are more skilled and capable at everything, there is no way out -- yes, antelope are oppressed by lions, but it's because lions are stronger than antelopes. Here we simply argue that women are weaker than men, not that oppressing women is okay -- it isn't. "It's cultural" is the absolute top argument of feminists, they say women are just as smart and capable as men and that men, since we lived in caves, somehow plotted to oppress women and keep it a secret from them that they're so smart -- if it's "cultural", then also ask why is the culture like this? Culture is shaped by needs, necessities, by reality; if we know one thing about evolution then it's that it OPTIMIZES everything to maximum -- if women give birth to children and then feed them, they won't go hunting with men, and if they don't go hunting, it's unnecessary to give them big brains capable of quick, precise decisions which require more nutrition, just as it's inefficient to give them big, strong bodies that need more food -- this is evolution, that's the reality and that's what formed the culture. Furthermore if women were weaker but not by that much, we should statistically see at least occasional dominance by a woman, but we practically don't, it's really almost impossible to find a single such case in history, which indicates women are VERY SIGNIFICANTLY weaker, i.e. not something negligible we could just ignore. Being a woman correlates to losing to a man almost perfectly, it is a great predictor, basically as strong as can appear in science.
 
 { I actually enjoy women football, mostly for its comedic value. ~drummyfish }