Update

magic.md

@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+# Magic
+
+Magic stands for unknown mechanisms. Once mechanisms of magic are revealed and understood, it becomes [science](science.md).

main.md

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ Welcome to [Less Retarded Wiki](lrs_wiki.md), an encyclopedia only I can edit. B
 
 This is a Wiki for [less retarded software](lrs.md), [less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md) (LRS) and related topics, mainly those of [politics](politics.md) and [society](society.md), idealization of which LRS should help achieve. LRS Wiki is a new, refreshing wiki without [political correctness](political_correctness.md).
 
-**We love all living beings. Even you.** We want to create technology that truly and maximally helps you. We do NOT [fight](fight_culture.md) anything. We want to move towards society that's not based on [competition](competition.md) but rather on [collaboration](collaboration.md).
+**We love all living beings. Even you.** We want to create technology that truly and maximally helps you, e.g. a completely [public domain computer](public_domain_computer.md). We do NOT [fight](fight_culture.md) anything and we don't have any heroes. We want to move peacefully towards [society](less_retarded_society.md) that's not based on [competition](competition.md) but rather on [collaboration](collaboration.md).
 
 This wiki is **NOT** a satire.
 
@@ -72,10 +72,11 @@ If you don't know where to start, here are some suggestions. If you're new, the
 - [anarcho pacifism](anpac.md)
 - [capitalism](capitalism.md)
 - [capitalist software](capitalist_software.md)
+- [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md)
 - [type A/B fail](fail_ab.md)
 - [free culture](free_culture.md)
+- [public domain computer](public_domain_computer.md)
 - [C tutorial](c_tutorial.md)
-- [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md)
 - [crimes against economy](crime_against_economy.md)
 - [antivirus paradox](antivirus_paradox.md)
 - [public domain](public_domain.md)

public_domain_computer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
+# Public Domain Computer
+
+Public domain computer is yet nonexistent but planned and highly desired [simple](kiss.md) ethical [computer](computer.md) (in the common meaning of the word) whose specification is completely in the public domain and which is made with completely [selfless](selflessness.md) [LRS](lrs.md)-aligned goal of being absolutely non-malicious and maximally helpful to everyone. It should be the "people's computer", a simple, [suckless](suckless.md), user-respecting hackable computer offering maximum [freedom](free_software.md), a computer which anyone can study, improve, manufacture and repair without paying any "[intellectual property](intellectual_property.md)" fees, a computer which people can buy for extremely low price and use for any purpose without being abused or oppressed.
+
+The project is basically about asking: what if computers were designed to serve us instead of corporations?
+
+Note that **the computer has to be 100% from the ground up in the true, safe and worldwide [public domain](public_domain.md)**, i.e. not just "[FOSS](foss.md)"-licensed, partially open etc. It should be created from scratch, so as to have no external [dependencies](dependency.md) and released safely to the public domain e.g. with [CC0](cc0.md) + patent waivers. Why? In a [good society](less_retarded_society.md) there simply have to exist basic tools that aren't owned by anyone, tools simply available to everyone without any conditions, just as we have hammers, pencils, public domain mathematical formulas etc. -- computing has become an essential part of society and it certainly has to become a universal "human right", there HAS TO exist an ethical alternative to the oppressive [capitalist technology](capitalist_technology.md) so that people aren't forced to accepting oppression by their computers simply by lack of an alternative. Creating a public domain computer would have similarly positive effects to those of e.g. [universal basic income](ubi.md) -- with the simple presence of an ethical option the oppressive technology would have a competition and would have to start to behave a bit -- oppressive capitalist technology nowadays is possibly largely thanks to the conspiracy of big computer manufacturers that rely on people being de facto obliged to buy one of their expensive, [proprietary](proprietary.md), [spyware](spyware.md) littered non-repairable consumerist computer with secret internals.
+
+**The computer can (and should) be very [simple](KISS.md)**. It doesn't -- and shouldn't -- try to be the way capitalist computers are, i.e. it would NOT be a typical computer "just in the public domain", **it would be different by basic design philosophy** because its goals would completely differ from those of capitalists. It would follow the [LRS](lrs.md) philosophy and be more similar to the very first personal computers rather than to the "[modern](modern.md)" HD/[bloated](bloat.md)/superfast/fashion computers. Let us realize that even a very simple computer can help tremendously as a great number of tasks people need can actually be handled by pretty primitive computers -- see what communities do e.g. with [open consoles](open_console.md).
+
+Even a pretty simple computer without an [operating system](os.md) is able to:
+
+- Browse much of the [Internet](internet.md), e.g. [smol web](smol_internet.md) (no [JavaScript](js.md) websites, [gopher](gopher.md), ...).
+- Handle communication, e.g. [email](email.md), [IRC](irc.md), ...
+- Allow reading, writing and storing [books](book.md), e.g. those from [Project Gutenberg](gutenberg.md) or offline [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) -- this can tremendously help education e.g. in the third world.
+- Run basic [software](software.md) such as calculator, stopwatch, calendar, note taking, alarm clock, memory-card reader, picture viewer, even simple [games](game.md) etc.
+- Serve as an [embedded](embedded.md) computer, e.g. [DYI](dyi.md) people and small business may use the computer in similar ways [Raspberry pi](rpi.md) is used nowadays (auto switching lights, opening doors, recording data from sensors, tiny robots, ...).
+- Control [peripherals](peripheral.md) through simple interfaces.
+
+## Details
+
+The project wouldn't aim to create a specific single "model" of a computer but rather blueprints that may be easily adjusted and mapped to any specific existing technology -- the goal would be to create an abstract [hardware](hardware.md) specification as well as basic [software](software.md) for the computer.
+
+Abstract hardware specification means e.g. description on the [logic gate](logic_gate.md) level so that the computer isn't dependent on any contemporary and potentially proprietary lower level technology such as [CMOS](cmos.md). The project would simply create a big logical circuit of the computer and this description could be "compiled" to a lower level circuit board description. The hardware description could also be parametrized so that certain features could be adjusted -- for example it might be possible to choose the amount of [RAM](ram.md) or disable specific CPU instructions to make a simpler, cheaper circuit board.
+
+**The computer would have to be created from the ground up**, with every design aspect following the ultimate goal. The project roadmap could look similarly to this one:
+
+1. Design a simple [instruction set architecture](isa.md) (ISA). This isn't that hard.
+2. With current [free](free_software.md) technology, e.g. [C](c.md) and [GNU](gnu.md), create custom tools for designing, simulating and testing logic gate circuits. Also not extremely difficult if we keep it simple.
+3. With these tools design a simple [MCU](mcu.md) computer based on the above mentioned ISA. This is doable, there are hobbyists that have designed their own 8bit CPUs, a few collaborating people could definitely create a nice MCU if they keep it simple (no caching, no floating point, no GPUs, ...).
+4. Design a simple (e.g. [FORTH](forth.md)-like) self-hosted [programming language](programming_language.md), create its compiler with support for the above mentioned ISA so that it is possible to write software for the computer. This may preceded or succeeded by adding the ISA support to an existing languages such as [C](c.md), e.g. by adding a new backed to [gcc](gcc.md). Again, pretty doable.
+5. Write basic [software](software.md) for the computer. [EZ](ez.md).
+6. Compile the MCU logic-level description to an actual circuitboard, possibly even with [proprietary](proprietary.md) tools if other aren't available -- this may be fixed later.
+7. Manufacture the first physical computer, test it, debug it, improve it, give it to people, ...
+8. Now the main goal has been touched for the first time, however the real [fun](fun.md) only begins -- now it is needed to spread the project, keep improving it, write advanced software such as an [operating system](os.md) etc.

race.md

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 # Race
 
+*All races are to coexist in love and peace, despite their differences.*
+
 Races of people are very large, loosely defined groups of genetically similar (related) people. Races usually significantly differ by their look and in physical, mental and cultural aspects. The topic of human race is nowadays forbidden to be critically discussed and researched, however there at least exists a number of older research and some things about race are completely obvious. [Good society](less_retarded_society.md), unlike for example our current [capitalist](capitalism.md) society, acknowledges the differences between human races and lets them coexist peacefully in social equality despite their differences and without any need for [bullshit](bullshit.md) such as [political correctness](political_correctness.md).
 
 Denying the facts regarding human race is called [race denialism](race_denialism.md), the acceptance of these facts is called [race realism](race_realism.md). Race denialism is part of the basis of today's [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) political ideology, theories such as polygenism (multiregional hypothesis) -- the idea that different races evolved from different pre-humans, i.e. Asians from asian monkeys, Africans from african monkeys etc. -- are forbidden to be supported and they're ridiculed and demonized by mainstream information sources like [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) who only promote the [politically correct](political_correctness.md) "out of Africa" theory. [SJWs](sjw.md) reject any idea of a race with the same religious fanaticism with which Christian fanatics opposed Darwin's evolution theory.

systemd.md

@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 # Systemd
 
-Systemd is a pretty bad, [bloated](bloat.md), [anti-Unix](unix_philosophy.md), [free-licensed](free_software.md) "software suite" used for initialization of an [operating system](os.md) and handling services like loggging in or managing network connections. It is a so called [PID 1](pid1.md) process. Systemd has been highly criticised by the proponents of [suckless](suckless.md) and [LRS](lrs.md) and even normies for its bloat, anti-Unix-philosophy design, [feature creep](feature_creep.md), security vulnerabilities and other stuff. Unfortunately it is being adopted by many [GNU](gnu.md)/[Linux](linux.md) distributions including [Arch Linux](arch.md) and [Debian](debian.md).
+Systemd is a horribly disastrous [bloated](bloat.md), [anti-Unix](unix_philosophy.md), "[FOSS](foss.md)" "software suite" used for initialization of an [operating system](os.md) and handling services like loggging in or managing network connections. It is a so called [PID 1](pid1.md) process. Systemd has been highly criticised by the proponents of [suckless](suckless.md) and [LRS](lrs.md) and even normies for its enormous amount of bloat, ugliness, anti-Unix-philosophy design, [feature creep](feature_creep.md), security vulnerabilities and other stuff. Unfortunately it is being adopted by many [GNU](gnu.md)/[Linux](linux.md) distributions including [Arch Linux](arch.md) and [Debian](debian.md). Some distros such as [Devuan](devuan.md) just said no to this shit and forked to a non-systemd version.
 
-For more detailed bashing of systemd see e.g. https://nosystemd.org/. It nicely sums up systemd with a quote: *"If this is the solution, I want my problem back*".
+Systemd was born when Harry Pot... ummm [Lennart Poettering](pottering.md) had [gay](gay.md) sex with [Kay Sievers](sievers.md).
+
+For more detailed bashing of systemd see e.g. https://nosystemd.org/. The site sums up systemd with a fitting quote: *"If this is the solution, I want my problem back*".

woman.md

@@ -1,8 +1,6 @@
-# Woman
+# <3 Woman <3
 
-A woman (also femoid or succubus) is one of two genders (sexes) of humans, the other one being [man](man.md). Women are notoriously bad at [programming](programming.mg), [math](math.md) and [technology](technology.md): in the field they usually "work" on [bullshit](bullshit.md) (and harmful) positions such as some "diversity department", [marketing](marketing.md), "HR" or [UI](ui.md)/[user experience](ux.md). If they get close to actual technology, their highest "skills" are mostly limited to casual "[coding](coding.md)" (which itself is a below-average form of [programming](programming.md)) in a baby language such as [Python](python.md), [Javascript](javascript.md) or [Rust](rust.md). Mostly they are just hired for quotas and make coffee for men who do the real work.
+A woman (also gurl, femoid or succubus) is one of two genders (sexes) of humans, the other one being [man](man.md). Women are [cute](cute.md) (sometimes) but notoriously bad at [programming](programming.mg), [math](math.md) and [technology](technology.md): in the field they usually "work" on [bullshit](bullshit.md) (and [harmful](harmful.md)) positions such as "diversity department", [marketing](marketing.md), "HR" or [UI](ui.md)/[user experience](ux.md). If they get close to actual technology, their highest "skills" are mostly limited to casual "[coding](coding.md)" (which itself is a below-average form of [programming](programming.md)) in a baby language such as [Python](python.md), [Javascript](javascript.md) or [Rust](rust.md). Mostly they are just hired for quotas and make coffee for men who do the real work. Don't let yourself be fooled by the propaganda, women aren't good with tech.
-
-lol http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com
 
 Women also can't drive, operate machines, they can't compare even to the worst men in sports, both physical and mental such as [chess](chess.md). Women have to have separate leagues and more relaxed rules, e.g. the title Woman Grand Master (WGM) in chess has far lower requirements to obtain than regular Grand Master (GM). (According to [Elo](elo.md) rating the best woman chess player in history would have only 8% chance of winning against current best male who would have 48% chance of winning). On the International Mathematical Olympiad only 43 out of 1338 medals were obtained by females. There are too many funny cases and video compilations of women facing men in sports (watch them before they're censored lol), e.g. the infamous Vaevictis female "progaming" team or the [football](football.md) match between the US national women team (probably the best women team in the world) vs some random under 15 years old boy's team which of course the women team lost. Of course there are arguments that worse performance of women in mental sports is caused culturally; women aren't led so much to playing chess, therefore there are fewer women in chess and so the probability of a good woman player appearing is lower. This may be partially true even though genetic factors seem at least equally important and it may equally be true that not so many women play chess simply because they're not naturally good at it; nevertheless the fact that women are generally worse at chess than men stands, regardless of its cause -- a randomly picked men will probably be better at chess than a randomly picked woman, and that's what matters in the end. Also if women are displaced from chess by culture, then what is the area they are displaced to? If women are as capable as men, then for any area dominated by men there should be an area equally dominated by women, however we see that anywhere men face women men win big time, even in the woman activities such as cooking. It makes sense from the evolutionary standpoint, women simply evolved to take care of children and guard fire while men had to be stronger and smarter in order to provide food and protection.
 
@@ -16,6 +14,8 @@ Of course, [LRS](lrs.md) loves all living beings equally, even women. In order t
 
 **Is there even anything women are better at than men?** Well, women seem for example more peaceful or at least less violent on average (feminism of course sees this as a "weakness" and tries to change it), though they seem to be e.g. more passive-aggressive. Nevertheless there have been a few successful queens in history, women can sometimes perhaps be good in representative roles (and other simple chair-sitting jobs). They have also evolved to perform the tasks of housekeeping and care taking at which they may excel (still it seems that if men fully focus on a specific tasks, they will beat a women, for example the best cooks in the world are men). Sometimes women may be preferable exactly for not being as "rough" as men, e.g. as singers, psychologists, massage therapists, sex workers etc.
 
+lol http://www.menarebetterthanwomen.com
+
 # Women In Tech/Science
 
 Finding famous women capable in technology is almost a futile task. One of the most famous women of [modern](modern.md) tech, even though more an entrepreneur than engineer, was [Elizabeth Holmes](elizabeth_holmes.md) who, to the feminists' dismay, turned out to be a complete fraud and is now facing criminal charges. [Grace Hopper](grace_hopper) (not "grass hopper" lol) is a woman actually worth mentioning for her contribution to programming languages, though the contribution is pretty weak. [Ada Lovelace](ada_lovelace.md) cited by the feminist propaganda as the "first programmer" also didn't actually do anything besides scribbling a note about a computer completely designed by a man. This just shows how desperate the feminist attempts at finding capable women in tech are. Then there are also some individuals who just contributed to the downfall of the technology who are, in terms of gender, at least partially on the woman side, but their actual classification is actually pretty debatable -- these are monstrosities with pink hair who invented such [cancer](cancer.md) as [COCs](coc.md) and are not even worth mentioning.