This commit is contained in:
Miloslav Ciz 2024-05-22 17:49:39 +02:00
parent be162bcdc9
commit b593b70f20
12 changed files with 1781 additions and 1758 deletions

View file

@ -40,6 +40,15 @@ Under [capitalism](capitalism.md) technological minimalism is suppressed in the
Remember, you can't lose if you don't play.
With increased interest in minimalism the word *minimalism* itself gets misused and abused. Let's be reminded that true minimalism aims to minimize everything that's unnecessary, it starts with good, minimalist design, but ultimately grows outwards and becomes a life philosophy that doesn't stop at the internals of machines, it tries to minimize for example even the desires of the user of the technology. Stopping at minimalist design of internals shouldn't be called minimalism because minimalist design is simply good design -- there is no such thing as a good, non-minimalist internal design. And then there is the shallow capitalist pseudominimalism that bets purely on the looks. The following table sums up the differences:
| what | internal minimalism | external minimalism |
| ---------------- | ------------------- | ------------------- |
| true minimalism | yes | yes |
| good design | yes | no |
| pseudominimalism | no | yes |
| bloat | no | no |
## Importance Of Minimalism: Simplicity Brings Freedom
It can't be stressed enough that minimalism is absolutely required for technological freedom, i.e. people having, in **practical** ways, control over their tools. While in today's society it is important to have legal freedoms, i.e. support [free software](free_software.md), we must not forget that this isn't enough, a freedom on paper means nothing if it can't be practiced. We need both legal AND [de facto](de_facto.md) freedom over technology, the former being guaranteed by a free [license](license.md), the latter by minimalism. Minimal, simple technology will increase the pool of people and parties who may practice the legal freedoms -- i.e. those to use, study, modify and share -- and therefore ensure that the technology will be developed according to what people need, NOT according to what a corporation needs (which is usually the opposite).