Update

debugging.md

@@ -79,6 +79,10 @@ ass(abs(playerPos.x) <= WORLD_BOUND && abs(playerPos.y) <= WORLD_BOUND,"player p
 
 Here if you don't define the `DEBUG` macro, the assert macro will just be an empty command that does nothing.
 
+### Finding The Breaking Change (Regression)
+
+If something that used to work stops working, it's a **[regression](regression.md)**. Here the first step towards fixing it is finding which exact change to the program broke it, i.e. find the last software version before the bug that didn't have the bug -- for this version control systems like [git](git.md) are very cool as they allows you to switch between different commits. In this search apply the binary search principle again (just like you search a word in a dictionary, i.e. keep checking the middle commit and move either before or after it depending on whether it already has the bug or not). Once you find the offending commit it's usually easy to spot the bug, you just have a relatively small amount of code in the commit which you can keep checking by parts if it's not immediately obvious (i.e. try to recreate the commit part by part and see when exactly it breaks, this moves you yet closer to the bug).
+
 ### Debuggers And Other Debugging Tools Like Profilers
 
 There exist many software tools specialized for just helping with debugging (there are even physical hardware debuggers etc.), they are either separate software (good) or integrated as part of some development environment (bad by [Unix philosophy](unix_philosophy.md)) such as an [IDE](ide.md), web browser etc. Nowadays a compiler itself will typically do some basic checks and give you warning about many things, but oftentimes you have to turn them on (check man pages of your compiler).

forth.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 Forth ("fourth generation" shortened to four characters due to technical limitations) is a very good, extremely [minimal](minimalism.md) [stack](stack.md)-based untyped [programming language](programming_language.md) that uses [postfix](notation.md) (reverse Polish) notation. Its vanilla form is super simple, it's miles simpler than [C](c.md), it's very [elegant](elegant.md) and its compiler/interpreter can be made very easily, giving it high practical freedom (i.e. not being practically controlled by any central organization). As of writing this the smallest Forth implementation, [milliforth](milliforth.md), has just **340 bytes** (!!!) of [machine code](machine_code.md), that's just incredible. Forth is used e.g. in [space](space.md) technology (e.g. [RTX2010](rtx2010.md), a radiation hardened space computer directly executing Forth) and [embedded](embedded.md) systems as a way to write efficient [low level](low_level.md) programs that are, unlike those written in [assembly](assembly.md), [portable](portability.md) (fun fact: there even exist computers directly running Forth in hardware). Forth was the main influence for [Comun](comun.md), the [LRS](lrs.md) programming language, it is also used by [Collapse OS](collapseos.md) and [Dusk OS](duskos.md) as the main language. In its minimalism Forth competes a bit with [Lisp](lisp.md).
 
-{ There used to be a nice Forth wiki at wiki.forthfreak.net, now it has to be accessed via archive as it's dead. ~drummyfish }
+{ There used to be a nice Forth wiki at wiki.forthfreak.net, now it has to be accessed via archive as it's dead. Also some nice site here https://www.forth.org/compilers.html. ~drummyfish }
 
 { There is also some discussion about how low level Forth really is, if it really is a language or something like a "metalanguage", or an "environment" to create your own language by defining your own words. Now this is not a place to go very deep on this but kind of a sum up may be this: Forth in its base version is very low level, however it's very extensible and many extend it to some kind of much higher level language, hence the debates. ~drummyfish }
 

go.md

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ The **ko** rule states that one mustn't make a move that returns the board to th
 
 **Handicaps:** TODO.
 
-**Implications of rules and basic of strategy/tactics:** life and death, eyes, atari, TODO.
+**Implications of rules and basic of strategy/tactics:** The very basic observation a beginner has to learn is that of life and death and especially so called **eyes** -- an eye is simply an empty square inside a group of stones, and it can easily be deduced that **if a group has at least two eyes, it can't be taken by the opponent** (the eyes have to be SEPARATE though, two empty squares next to each other aren't two eyes). One eye isn't enough to keep the group alive -- the opponent can still surround this group and then take it by placing one stone in the eye, so two eyes are necessary. From this it follows that players try to make groups with these two eyes and more tactics follow from it -- for example if it's clear a group can no longer form two eyes, usually the player just stops wasting more time on it and lets it be sacrificed. This is the number one "implied" rule and many, MANY more follow, but here is not a place to recount them all: for more please refer for example to the Sensei's library.
 
 **Example:** the following is an example of the end state of a beginner game on a 9x9 board:
 

hero_culture.md

@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@ Hero culture (or just hero cult) is a [harmful](harmful.md) [culture](culture.md
 
 **Do NOT create heroes. Follow ideas, not people**. Also similarly: hate ideas, not people, and follow ideas, not groups.
 
+**Popularity is just successful [populism](populism.md).**
+
 Smart people know this and those being named *heroes* themselves many times protest it, e.g. Marie Curie has famously stated: "be less curious about people and more curious about ideas." Anarchists purposefully don't name theories after their inventors but rather by their principles, knowing the danger of hero culture leading to social hierarchy and also that people are imperfect -- people are like packages, a mixture of both good and bad inadvertently inseparable, they carry distorting associations, they make mistakes and their images are twisted by history and politics -- even the character of [Jesus](jesus.md), a "theoretically perfect human", has been many times twisted in ways that are hard to believe. Worshiping an individual always comes with the tendency to embrace and support everything he does, all his opinions and actions, including the extremely bad ones. Abusive regimes are the ones who use heroes and their names for propaganda -- Stalinism, Leninism, corporations such as Ford, named after their founder etc. Heroes become brands whose stamp of approval is used to push bad ideas... especially popular are heroes who are already dead and can't protest their image being abused -- see for example how [Einstein's](einstein.md) image has been raped by [capitalists](capitalism.md) for their own propaganda, e.g. by [Apple](apple.md)'s [marketing](marketing.md), while in fact Einstein was a pacifist socialist highly critical of capitalism. This is not to say an idea's name cannot be abused, the word *[communism](communism.md)* has for example become something akin a swear word after being abused by regimes that had little to do with real communism. Nevertheless it is still much better to focus on ideas as ideas always carry their own principle embedded within them, visible to anyone willing to look, and can be separated from other ideas very easily. Focusing on ideas allows us to discuss them critically, it allows us to reject a bad concept without "attacking" the human who came up with it.
 
 Mainstream [US](usa.md) mentality of strong hero culture is now infecting the whole world and reaches unbelievably retarded levels, which is further not helped by shit like the stupid superhero movies. Besides calling murderers (soldiers) heroes, it is now for example standard to call handicapped people heroes, literally only because they are handicapped and it makes them feel better, even if they do nothing special and even if they actually live more comfortable lives than poor healthy peasants who have to live miserably and slave at work every day without getting anyone's attention. Or -- and this is yet another level of stupidity -- **anyone who just happens to not behave like a dick in case of some emergency is guaranteed to be called a hero**; for example if someone by chance walks by a baby that is drowning in a pool and saves the baby from dying will with 100% probability be called a hero in the media. But WHY the fuck would that be? Is the guy a hero because he didn't just sit down a watch the baby drown? It is the absolutely normal behavior to save a drowning baby if one sees it, especially when there is very little risk of own life in doing so (such as just jumping into the pool); calling someone a hero for doing so is like calling a gun owner a hero for not going to the streets to randomly shoot at people. So in this fucked up society the title of *hero* is basically won like a lottery -- you just have to be lucky enough to be present at some emergency and then just do the normal thing.

less_retarded_society.md

@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ As people don't have to work, very few people need to make daily travels, theref
 
 **People aren't individualist and [egoistic](egoism.md)**, they don't have tattoos, dyed hair, piercing etc., that's simply bullshit of primitive competitive cultures. It is correctly seen as immoral to try to persuade by "good looks" -- for example by wearing a [suit](suit.md) -- that's simply a cheap attempt at deception. Everyone is valued the same no matter his looks, people don't feel the need to change their gender or alter their look so as to appeal to anyone or to follow some kind of fashion, trend, to strategically join some minority to gain the best set of "[rights](rights_culture.md)" or to infiltrate specific social class. Of course cutting hair e.g. for comfort is practiced, but no one wastes his time with makeup and similar nonsense.
 
-**People live in harmony with nature**, the enormous waste of capitalism and consumerist society has been eliminated, industry isn't raping nature, cities are greener and more integrated with nature, people live in energy-efficient underground houses, there are fewer roads as people don't use [cars](car.md) much thanks to efficient public transport and lower need for travel thanks to not having to go to work, utilizing mostly local resources etc.
+**People live in harmony with nature**, from space it is hard to tell humans live on Earth, the enormous waste of capitalism and consumerist society has been eliminated, industry isn't raping nature. Cities (or rather many villages) are greener and more integrated with nature, people live in energy-efficient underground houses (by which they create more land), there are fewer roads as people don't use [cars](car.md) much thanks to efficient public transport and lower need for commuting and transportation thanks to not having to go to work, utilizing mostly local resources etc. Thanks to this light pollution, noise and CO2 emissions decrease greatly. Although work is automatized, relatively few machines are required thanks to simplification and eliminating all bullshit that's connected to running our current farms and factories (which further eliminates the recursive need for factories that create machines for building and maintaining factories etc.), and thanks to decreased need of things, for example mentioned cars.
 
 **Research advances faster, people are smarter, more rational, emphatic, loving and more moral**. Nowadays probably the majority of the greatest brains are wasted on bullshit activity such as studying and trying to hack the [market](market.md) -- even professional researchers nowadays waste time on "safe", lucrative unnecessary bullshit research in the "publish or perish" spirit, chasing grants, easy [patents](patent.md) etc. In our ideal society smart people focus on truly relevant issues such as curing cancer, without being afraid of failure, stalling, negative results, lack of funds etc. People are responsible and practice e.g. voluntary birth control to prevent overpopulation. However people are NOT cold rational machines, on the contrary emotions are present much more than today, for example the emotion of [love](love.md) towards life is so strong most people are willing to die to save someone else, even a complete stranger. People express emotion through rich art and good deeds. People are also spiritual despite being highly rational -- they know rationality is but one of many tools for viewing and understanding the world. **[Religion](religion.md) still exists** commonly but not in radical or hostile forms; Christianity, Islam and similar religions become more similar to e.g. [Buddhism](buddhism.md), some even merge after realizing their differences are relatively unimportant and stop competing for mass control of people, religion becomes much less organized and much more personal.
 

lrs.md

@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ Apart from this software a lot of other software developed by other people and g
 - **[Simon Tatham's portable puzzle collection](stppc.md)**: Very portable collection of puzzle [games](game.md).
 - ...
 
-Other potentially LRS software to check out may include [TinyGL](tinygl.md), [scc](scc.md), [ed](ed.md), [chibicc](chibicc.md), [IBNIZ](ibniz.md), [lynx](lynx.md), [links](links.md), [tcl](tcl.md), [uClibc](uclibc.md), [miniz](miniz.md), [Lua](lua.md), [nuklear](nuklear.md), [dmenu](dmenu.md), [sbase](sbase.md), [sic](sic.md), [tabbed](tabbed.md), [svkbd](svkbd.md), [busybox](busybox.md), [darcs](darcs.md), [raylib](raylib.md), [IRC](irc.md), [PortableGL](portablegl.md), [3dmr](3dmr.md), [openbsd](openbsd.md), [mtpaint](mtpaint.md) and others.
+Other potentially LRS software to check out may include [TinyGL](tinygl.md), [bootleg3d](bootleg3d.md), [scc](scc.md), [ed](ed.md), [chibicc](chibicc.md), [IBNIZ](ibniz.md), [lynx](lynx.md), [links](links.md), [tcl](tcl.md), [uClibc](uclibc.md), [miniz](miniz.md), [Lua](lua.md), [nuklear](nuklear.md), [dmenu](dmenu.md), [sbase](sbase.md), [sic](sic.md), [tabbed](tabbed.md), [svkbd](svkbd.md), [busybox](busybox.md), [darcs](darcs.md), [raylib](raylib.md), [IRC](irc.md), [PortableGL](portablegl.md), [3dmr](3dmr.md), [openbsd](openbsd.md), [mtpaint](mtpaint.md) and others.
 
 Another idea: **search for very old versions of "[modern](modern.md)" FOSS software**, from the times before things like [CMake](cmake.md), [Python](python.md) and [QT](qt.md) got popular (or even existed) -- many such projects got bloated with time, but their earlier versions may have been more aligned with LRS. You can get the old source code, it's present either in the git, on the project's website, on Internet Archive etc., compiling it should probably be much easier than compiling the "modern" version. This won't help with things like web browsers (as it won't understand the new formats and protocols), but will be fine text editors, drawing programs, 3D editors, games etc. You can also [fork](fork.md) the old version and make it a little better, customize it or publicly turn it into a new program, helping the whole world.
 

marxism.md

@@ -2,6 +2,12 @@
 
 *Not to be [confused](often_confused.md) with [communism](communism.md).*
 
-Marxism comprises of ideas, theories and ideologies strongly based in works of [Karl Marx](marx.md) (and also Friedrich Engels), roughly aiming for a violent [revolution](revolution.md) that should end [capitalism](capitalism.md), replace it with "[socialist](socialism.md)" society and eventually a truly [communist](communism.md) society. Despite the terms Marxism and communism NOT being equal (communism is a general idea with many branches, e.g. [anarcho communism](ancom.md), Christian communism etc.), most common people see them as equivalent, which is unfortunate because communism is a purely [good](good.md) idea while Marxism is mostly a bad way of trying to achieve and sustain their own idea of communism (the relationship between communism and Marxism may be roughly compared to the relationship between Christianity and Catholicism). Marxism comes with aggressive, revolutionary mindset that has caused great tragedies mainly during the 20th century (see especially [USSR](ussr.md)). Many non-Marxist communists even see Marxist "communist" states as capitalist (so called state capitalism). Marxism sees itself as a [scientific](science.md) effort, it is studied by intellectuals and lives mainly in written works of Marxists.
+Marxism comprises of ideas, theories (known as *historical materialism*) and ideologies strongly based in works of [Karl Marx](marx.md) (and also Friedrich Engels), roughly aiming for (and scientifically predicting) a violent [revolution](revolution.md) that should end [capitalism](capitalism.md), replace it with "[socialist](socialism.md)" society and eventually a truly [communist](communism.md) society. Despite the terms Marxism and communism NOT being equal (communism is a general idea with many branches, e.g. [anarcho communism](ancom.md), Christian communism etc.), most common people see them as equivalent, which is unfortunate because communism is a purely [good](good.md) idea while Marxism is mostly a bad way of trying to achieve and sustain their own idea of communism (the relationship between communism and Marxism may be roughly compared to the relationship between Christianity and Catholicism). Marxism comes with aggressive, revolutionary mindset that has caused great tragedies mainly during the 20th century (see especially [USSR](ussr.md)). Many non-Marxist communists even see Marxist "communist" states as capitalist (so called state capitalism). Marxism sees itself as a [scientific](science.md) effort, it is studied by intellectuals and lives mainly in written works of Marxists.
 
-**We, [LRS](lrs.md), are communists but do NOT embrace Marxism!** Though we do agree with Marxists on many things (mostly identifying issues of [capitalism](capitalism.md) and the desire to replace it with some form of communism) and Marxism is still probably better than [capitalism](capitalism.md) (as anything is better than capitalism), we can't ever approve of some inherent traits of Marxism, mainly the following. Marxism is **violent**, aggressive and revolutionary, often highly hostile to [anarchism](anarchism.md) and [pacifism](pacifism.md) (which we highly embrace), wanting to FORCE communism. Marxists promote establishment of temporary **dictatorship** of the proletariat as they see it the only way to ending capitalism. **Marxists are NOT [altruists](altruism.md)**, their desire of communism doesn't come from love of life, they simply see it as a more efficient societal system than capitalism that's a natural and inevitable next step in evolution of society, they see a man as servant of society, **they are obsessed with [work](work.md)** (even preferring to call themselves *workers* rather than *people*; [language matters](name_is_important.md)) and see people who don't share their values as undesirable -- these undesirable people are not only capitalists, but also people who don't want to work, religious people or people who refuse to [fight](fight_culture.md) for their society. They say that ends justify the means and will happily utilize means such as [war](war.md), dictatorship, executions, [censorship](censorship.md), cults of personality and propaganda. We cannot ever stand behind this.
+Marx himself wasn't really any angry revolutionary but more of an intellectual, a philosopher who tried to [scientifically](science.md) examine [history](history.md) and came up with so called [historical materialism](historical_materialism.md), a theory that basically states that everything (structure of society, its [law](law.md), [culture](culture.md) etc.) is subdued to economic forces and that society changes solely due to these forces, i.e. things like changes in [technology](technology.md), means of production, economic relationships etc. -- he said individual humans are just slaves to these forces, their will cannot change them. He identified certain classes in society, mainly the proletariat (workers) and bourgeoisie (their overlords) and then reasoned some stuff about their conflict etcetc. until he came to the conclusion that capitalism will be surpassed by socialism and eventually communism -- not as anything ethical or "just", but purely as superior systems in terms of economy. So he basically only predicted the revolution would inevitably happen, however some other people who came after him -- those that we nowadays call Marxists (at least most commonly) -- took this theory and started to use it as a basis to PROMOTE an active revolution.
+
+**We, [LRS](lrs.md), are communists but do NOT embrace Marxism!** Though we do agree with Marxists on many things (mostly identifying issues of [capitalism](capitalism.md)), we can't ever approve of some inherent traits of Marxism, mainly the following. Marxism is **violent**, aggressive and revolutionary, often highly hostile to [anarchism](anarchism.md) and [pacifism](pacifism.md) (which we highly embrace), wanting to FORCE communism. Marxists promote establishment of temporary **dictatorship** of the proletariat as they see it the only way to ending capitalism. **Marxists are NOT [altruists](altruism.md)**, their desire of communism doesn't come from love of life, they simply see it as a more efficient societal system than capitalism that's a natural and inevitable next step in evolution of society, they see a man as servant of society, **they are obsessed with [work](work.md)** (even preferring to call themselves *workers* rather than *people*; [language matters](name_is_important.md)) and see people who don't share their values as undesirable -- these undesirable people are not only capitalists, but also people who don't want to work, religious people or people who refuse to [fight](fight_culture.md) for their society. They say that ends justify the means and will happily utilize means such as [war](war.md), dictatorship, executions, [censorship](censorship.md), cults of personality and propaganda. We cannot ever stand behind this.
+
+## See Also
+
+- [historical materialism](historical_materialism.md)

sw_rendering.md

@@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ Possible tricks, cheats and [optimizations](optimization.md) you may utilize inc
 
 These are some notable software renderers:
 
+- **Bootleg3D/RAL**: Very tiny, flat-shaded, super suckless (< 1000 LOC) renderers ([RAL link](https://codeberg.org/Ilya3point999k/RAL)).
 - **[Build engine](build_engine.md)**: So called ["pseudo 3D"](pseudo_3d.md) or primitive 3D, this was a very popular [proprietary](proprietary.md) portal-rendering engine for older games like [Duke Nukem 3D](duke3d.md) or [Blood](blood.md).
 - **[BRender](brender.md)**: Old commercial renderer used in games such as Carmageddon, Croc or [Harry Potter](harry_potter.md) 1. Later made [FOSS](foss.md).
 - **[Chasm: The Rift](chasm_the_rift.md) engine**: Mysterious proprietary 1997 renderer made specifically for one game, notable especially by being a hybrid of "2.5D" and "true 3D", it managed to make it look very good.

wiki_stats.md

@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
 This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
 
 - number of articles: 583
-- number of commits: 832
-- total size of all texts in bytes: 4035391
-- total number of lines of article texts: 30595
+- number of commits: 833
+- total size of all texts in bytes: 4041978
+- total number of lines of article texts: 30634
 - number of script lines: 262
 - occurences of the word "person": 7
 - occurences of the word "nigger": 89
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ longest articles:
 
 - [c_tutorial](c_tutorial.md): 124K
 - [exercises](exercises.md): 104K
-- [how_to](how_to.md): 72K
 - [capitalism](capitalism.md): 72K
+- [how_to](how_to.md): 72K
 - [less_retarded_society](less_retarded_society.md): 64K
 - [chess](chess.md): 56K
 - [faq](faq.md): 52K
@@ -35,60 +35,80 @@ longest articles:
 
 top 50 5+ letter words:
 
-- which (2298)
-- there (1744)
-- people (1549)
-- example (1332)
-- other (1258)
+- which (2301)
+- there (1747)
+- people (1550)
+- example (1335)
+- other (1259)
 - number (1142)
-- software (1128)
-- about (1081)
-- program (916)
+- software (1129)
+- about (1083)
+- program (918)
 - their (861)
 - because (842)
-- would (822)
+- would (823)
 - being (788)
 - called (787)
-- language (756)
+- language (757)
+- things (749)
 - numbers (747)
-- things (744)
 - something (743)
 - computer (742)
 - simple (725)
-- without (689)
+- without (691)
+- programming (674)
 - function (673)
-- programming (672)
-- these (645)
-- different (642)
-- however (634)
+- these (647)
+- different (643)
+- however (637)
+- system (596)
 - world (595)
-- system (594)
-- should (582)
+- should (584)
 - doesn (574)
 - games (569)
 - point (563)
 - society (559)
-- while (543)
+- while (544)
+- drummyfish (532)
 - though (531)
-- drummyfish (530)
-- using (516)
-- still (515)
+- using (517)
+- still (517)
 - memory (508)
 - possible (506)
-- simply (502)
-- similar (499)
-- course (493)
-- technology (485)
-- https (473)
-- always (462)
+- simply (505)
+- similar (500)
+- course (495)
+- technology (494)
+- https (477)
+- always (463)
 - really (452)
-- basically (448)
+- basically (450)
 - extremely (447)
 - value (446)
 
 latest changes:
 
 ```
+Date:   Tue Jul 9 15:45:39 2024 +0200
+  art.md
+  assembly.md
+  capitalism.md
+  comun.md
+  corporation.md
+  drummyfish.md
+  git.md
+  idiot_fallacy.md
+  main.md
+  minimalism.md
+  npc.md
+  often_confused.md
+  portability.md
+  programming_tips.md
+  random_page.md
+  stereotype.md
+  technology.md
+  wiki_pages.md
+  wiki_stats.md
 Date:   Fri Jul 5 21:16:01 2024 +0200
   art.md
   czechia.md
@@ -105,29 +125,6 @@ Date:   Fri Jul 5 21:16:01 2024 +0200
   wiki_pages.md
   wiki_stats.md
 Date:   Tue Jul 2 20:46:24 2024 +0200
-  21st_century.md
-  4chan.md
-  bill_gates.md
-  compression.md
-  copyright.md
-  czechia.md
-  disease.md
-  encyclopedia.md
-  exercises.md
-  feminism.md
-  freedom.md
-  good_enough.md
-  hero_culture.md
-  less_retarded_society.md
-  lgbt.md
-  liberalism.md
-  libertarianism.md
-  life.md
-  loquendo.md
-  lrs_wiki.md
-  main.md
-  marketing.md
-  needed.md
 ```
 
 most wanted pages:
@@ -155,14 +152,14 @@ most wanted pages:
 
 most popular and lonely pages:
 
-- [lrs](lrs.md) (283) 
-- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (225) 
+- [lrs](lrs.md) (284) 
+- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (227) 
 - [c](c.md) (215) 
 - [bloat](bloat.md) (206) 
 - [free_software](free_software.md) (171) 
 - [game](game.md) (141) 
 - [suckless](suckless.md) (137) 
-- [proprietary](proprietary.md) (120) 
+- [proprietary](proprietary.md) (121) 
 - [computer](computer.md) (98) 
 - [kiss](kiss.md) (96) 
 - [modern](modern.md) (95) 
@@ -172,19 +169,19 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
 - [programming](programming.md) (84) 
 - [fun](fun.md) (81) 
 - [free_culture](free_culture.md) (81) 
+- [censorship](censorship.md) (79) 
 - [less_retarded_society](less_retarded_society.md) (78) 
 - [fight_culture](fight_culture.md) (78) 
-- [censorship](censorship.md) (78) 
 - [math](math.md) (77) 
 - [public_domain](public_domain.md) (75) 
 - [hacking](hacking.md) (75) 
 - [foss](foss.md) (75) 
 - [bullshit](bullshit.md) (74) 
 - [art](art.md) (72) 
+- [shit](shit.md) (71) 
 - [programming_language](programming_language.md) (71) 
-- [shit](shit.md) (70) 
 - [float](float.md) (68) 
-- [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md) (67) 
+- [chess](chess.md) (68) 
 - ...
 - [wiki_pages](wiki_pages.md) (4) 
 - [whale](whale.md) (4) 

woman.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ The symbol for woman is a circle with cross at its bottom ([Unicode](unicode.md)
 
 **Even mainstream science acknowledges women are dumber than men**: even the extremely politically correct [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) states TODAY in the article on human brain that male brain is on average larger in volume (even when corrected for the overall body size) AND that there is correlation between volume and intelligence: this undeniably implies women are dumber. Men also have faster reaction times. On average male brain weights 10% more than woman's and has 16% more brain cells. The Guinness book of 1987 states the average male brain weight being 1424 grams and that of a female being 1242 grams; the averages both grow with time quite quickly so nowadays the numbers will be higher in both sexes, though the average of men grows faster. The heaviest recorded brain belonged to a man (2049 grams), while the lightest belonged to a woman (1096 grams). Heaviest woman brain weighted 1565 grams, only a little more than men's average. [IQ](iq.md)/intelligence measured by various tests has been consistently significantly lower for women than for men, e.g. the paper named *Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A paradox resolved* found a 4 point difference, noting that in some problems such as 3D spatial rotations males score even 11 points higher average.
 
-Historically women have been privileged over men, and they still are very much (for example they commit suicides much less often) -- while men had to [work](work.md) their asses off, go to [wars](war.md), explore and hunt for food, women often weren't even supposed to work, they could stay at home, chill while guarding the fire and playing with children -- this is becoming less and less so with [capitalism](capitalism.md) which aims to simply enslave everyone, nowadays mostly through the [feminist](feminism.md) cult that brainwashed women to desire the same slavery as men. Statistically **women live about 6 years longer lives than men** because they have easier and less stressful life, they don't have to work as hard and they can obtain privileges (such as free food and better healthcare) just with a flirty smile. While feminists are furious about wage gaps, none gives a single damn about this opposite kind of inequality gap which just confirms what everyone already knows: feminists don't care about equality, they care about women.
+Historically women have been privileged over men, and they still are very much (for example they commit suicides much less often) -- while men had to [work](work.md) their asses off, go to [wars](war.md), explore and hunt for food, women often weren't even supposed to work, they could stay at home, chill while guarding the fire and playing with children -- this is becoming less and less so with [capitalism](capitalism.md) which aims to simply enslave everyone, nowadays mostly through the [feminist](feminism.md) cult that brainwashed women to desire the same slavery as men. Statistically **women live about 6 years longer lives than men** because they have easier and less stressful life, they don't have to work as hard and they can obtain privileges (such as free food and better healthcare) just with a flirty smile. While feminists are furious about wage gaps, none gives a single damn about this opposite kind of inequality gap which just confirms what everyone already knows: feminists don't care about equality, they care about women. Women also have the huge social privilege of being able to to have sex and/or get a partner at any time with no effort and/or **trade sex (or even just mere company) for things and services**. Being a woman means playing life on very low difficulty, you can have anything you want at any time. Man on the other hand won't get sex unless he's a billionaire or at least 2 meters tall, no matter how smart, nice of physically fit he is. For a woman to get sex it's enough to just ask while not weighting two tons, that's literally how easy it is.
 
 Women also can't drive, operate machines, they can't compare even to the worst men in sports, both physical and mental such as [chess](chess.md). Women have to have separate leagues and more relaxed rules, e.g. the title Woman Grand Master (WGM) in chess has far lower requirements to obtain than regular Grand Master (GM). (According to [Elo](elo.md) rating the best woman chess player in history would have only 8% chance of winning against current best male who would have 48% chance of winning). On the International Mathematical Olympiad only 43 out of 1338 medals were obtained by females. There are too many funny cases and video compilations of women facing men in sports (watch them before they're censored lol), e.g. the infamous Vaevictis female "progaming" team or the [football](football.md) match between the US national women team (probably the best women team in the world) vs some random under 15 years old boy's team which of course the women team lost. LMAO there is even a video of 1 skinny boy beating 9 women in boxing. Of course there are arguments that worse performance of women in mental sports is caused culturally; women aren't led so much to playing chess, therefore there are fewer women in chess and so the probability of a good woman player appearing is lower. This may be partially true even though genetic factors seem at least equally important and it may equally be true that not so many women play chess simply because they're not naturally good at it; nevertheless the fact that women are generally worse at chess than men stands, regardless of its cause -- a randomly picked men will most likely be better at chess than a randomly picked woman, and that's what matters in the end. Also if women are displaced from chess by culture, then what is the area they are displaced to? If women are as capable as men, then for any area dominated by men there should be an area equally dominated by women, however we see that anywhere men face women men win big time, even in the woman activities such as cooking and fashion design. Feminists will say that men simply oppress women everywhere, but this just means that women are dominated by men everywhere, which means they are more skilled and capable at everything, there is no way out -- yes, antelope are oppressed by lions, but it's because lions are stronger than antelopes. Here we simply argue that women are weaker than men, not that oppressing women is okay -- it isn't. Furthermore if women were weaker but not by that much, we should statistically see at least occasional dominance by a woman, but we practically don't, it's really almost impossible to find a single such case in history, which indicates women are VERY SIGNIFICANTLY weaker, i.e. not something we negligible we could just ignore. Being a woman correlates to losing to a man almost perfectly, it is a great predictor, basically as strong as can appear in science. It makes sense from the evolutionary standpoint as well, women simply evolved to take care of children, guard fire and save resource consumption by being only as strong as necessarily required for this task, while men had to be stronger and smarter to do the hard job of providing food and protection.
 

yes_they_can.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Yes They Can
 
-*"The bigger the lie, the more it will be believed."* --[Joseph Goebbels](goebbels.md), [NSDAP](nazism.md) minister of propaganda
+*"The bigger the lie, the more it will be believed."* --[Joseph Goebbels](goebbels.md), [NSDAP](nazism.md) [minister of propaganda](influencer.md)
 
 If you think [they](they.md) can't do something, you are wrong; unless it is directly violating a law of physics, they can do it. For example you may think "haha they can't start selling air, people would revolt", "hahaaa, they can't make people believe 1 + 1 equals 2000, it's too obvious of a lie" or "hahaaa they can't lie about [history](history.md) when there is a ton of direct evidence for the contrary freely accessible on the Internet, they can't [censor](censorship.md) something that's all over the Internet and in billions of books" -- yes, they can do all of this. With enough [capitalism](capitalism.md) you can make people believe a circle to be square, they have already made people desire their everyday torture, they made people believe colors and offensive statistics are just culturally constructed hallucinations, [feminists](feminism.md) have already made people widely believe a woman can beat an adult man -- a naive man of the past would likely believe this to be impossible as well. Well, we see under capitalism it is quite possible.