drummyfish/less_retarded_wiki
5
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Update

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Miloslav Ciz 2025-07-10 23:36:36 +02:00
parent 988fcd52b0
commit d1ad5b0b9a
9 changed files with 2040 additions and 1974 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
abstraction.md
View file

@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Abstraction is an important concept in [programming](programming.md), [mathemati
[Mathematics](math.md) is a discipline best exemplifying abstraction: it deals purely with abstract concepts. Initially this abstraction is mild -- [numbers](number.md) and [sets](set.md) for example -- and the more it advances, the deeper and harder to grasp the abstraction becomes, towards difficult to imagine concepts such as [differential equations](differential_equation.md), [categories](category.md), [quaternions](quaternion.md), different types of [infinities](infinity.md), [decidability](decidability.md) etc. Some subjects go as far to almost lose any connection with the [real world](irl.md), leaving us completely without any intuition or a way to even visualize what we're dealing with. Ever growing abstraction is probably the inevitable purpose and objective of mathematics, but now let's rather ask how abstraction relates to programming.
In programming we have to be more careful: abstraction here means basically "making stuff easier by hiding and ignoring lower levels of abstraction", i.e. making [libraries](library.md), [languages](programming_language.md) and other tools that facilitate work with the astronomically complex computer hardware. In mainstream [programming](programming.md) education it is generally taught to "abstract as much as possible" because that's aligned with the [capitalist](capitalism.md) way of technology -- high abstraction is easy to handle for incompetent [programming monkeys](soydev.md), it helps preventing them from making damage by employing billions of safety mechanisms, it allows them to quickly learn to do poorly what should be done properly, it also perpetuates the cult of never stopping layering of the abstraction sandwich, creating [bloat](bloat.md), [hype](hype.md), bullshit jobs, it makes computers slower, constantly outdated and so drives software [consumerism](consumerism.md). As with everything in capitalism, new abstractions are products hyped on grounds of immediate benefit: creating more comfort, being something new and "[modern](modern.md)", increasing "[productivity](productivity_cult.md)", lowering "barriers of entry" so that ANYONE CAN NOW BE A PROGRAMMER without even knowing anything about computers (try to imagine this e.g. in the field of medicine) etc. -- of course, long term negative effects are completely ignored. Abstraction is useful but what's happening here is twisting its meaning: instead of **ignoring details** where it's acceptable and useful, abstraction is now used as an excuse meaning **ignorance of details**, i.e. whereas originally a programmer knew the details and would decide to ignore them where it's of benefit, nowadays the programmer doesn't know the details at all because he thinks he is allowed to by the existence of abstraction, and so he ignores them in any situation. **This is BAD.** It is basically why technology has been on such a huge downfall in the latest decades and why so many incompetent people flooded the industry. Opposing this, [LRS](lrs.md) advocates to employ only as little abstraction as needed, so as to support [minimalism](minimalism.md). **Too much abstraction is bad.** For example a widely used general purpose programming language should basically only have as much abstraction as to allow [portability](portability.md), it should definitely NOT succumb high abstraction such as [object obsessed programming](oop.md).
In programming we have to be more careful: abstraction here means basically "making stuff easier by hiding and ignoring lower levels of abstraction", i.e. making [libraries](library.md), [languages](programming_language.md) and other tools that facilitate work with the astronomically complex computer hardware. In mainstream [programming](programming.md) education it is generally taught to "abstract as much as possible" because that's aligned with the [capitalist](capitalism.md) way of technology -- high abstraction is easy to handle for incompetent [programming monkeys](soydev.md), it helps preventing them from making damage by employing billions of safety mechanisms, it allows them to quickly learn to do poorly what should be done properly, it also perpetuates the cult of never stopping layering of the abstraction sandwich, creating [bloat](bloat.md), [hype](hype.md), bullshit jobs, it makes computers slower, constantly outdated and so drives software [consumerism](consumerism.md). As with everything in capitalism, new abstractions are products hyped on grounds of immediate benefit: creating more comfort, being something new and "[modern](modern.md)", increasing "[productivity](productivity_cult.md)", lowering "barriers of entry" so that ANYONE CAN NOW BE A PROGRAMMER without even knowing anything about computers (try to imagine this e.g. in the field of medicine) etc. -- of course, long term negative effects are completely ignored. Abstraction is useful but what's happening here is twisting its meaning: instead of **ignoring details** where it's acceptable and useful, abstraction is now used as an excuse meaning **ignorance of details**, i.e. whereas originally a programmer knew the details and would decide to ignore them where it's of benefit, nowadays the programmer doesn't know the details at all because he thinks he is allowed to by the existence of abstraction, and so he ignores them in any situation. **This is BAD.** It is basically why technology has been on such a huge downfall in the latest decades and why so many incompetent people flooded the industry. Opposing this, [LRS](lrs.md) advocates to employ only as little abstraction as needed, so as to support [minimalism](minimalism.md). **Too much abstraction is bad.** For example a widely used general purpose programming language should only have as much abstraction as to allow [portability](portability.md), it should definitely NOT resort to high abstraction such as [object obsessed programming](oop.md).
Upon closer inspection we find that abstraction is not one-dimensional, we may abstract in different directions ("look at the issue from different angles"); for example [functional](functional.md), [logic](logic_paradigm.md) and [object](object.md) paradigms are different ways of programming languages abstracting from the low level, each one in different way. So the matter of abstracting is further complicated by trying to **choose the right abstraction** -- one kind of abstraction may work well for certain kinds of problems (i.e. solving these problems will become simple when applying this abstraction) but badly for other kinds of problems. The art of choosing right abstraction ([model](model.md)) is important e.g. in designing computer [simulations](simulation.md) -- if we want so simulate e.g. human society, do we simulate individual people in it or just societies as whole entities? Do we simulate wars as a simple dice roll or do we let individual soldiers fight their own battles? Do we represent roads as actual surfaces on top of which cars move according to laws of physics, or do we simplify to something like mathematical graph connecting cities with mere abstract lines, or something in between like a cellular automaton maybe? Do we consider beings living on a round planet, with possibilities like meteor impacts and space flights, or do we simply consider people living on a flat 2D sheet of paper? Similar though has come to designing [games](game.md) (another kind of simulation).

2
disease.md
View file

@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ Disease is a bad state of living organism's health caused by failure of its inne
- [autism](autism.md)
- [cancer](cancer.md)
- [capitalism](capitalism.md)
- [bullshit](bullshit.md) intolerance (potentially a good disease)
- crippling [purity checking](purity_checking.md)
- chronic downloading
- citation addiction, also known as [pseudoskeptic](pseudoskepticism.md)'s disease^[1][2][3]
@ -59,6 +60,7 @@ Disease is a bad state of living organism's health caused by failure of its inne
- [self interest](self_interest.md)
- [schizophrenia](schizo.md)
- [shitty body](body_shaming.md)
- [speedrunning](speedrun.md)
- [transsexualism](tranny.md)
- [tool slavery](tool_slave.md)
- [troll personality disorder](troll_personality_disorder.md)

37
logic.md
View file

@ -6,9 +6,42 @@ TODO: moar stuff here, different orders of logic etc.
Formal logic is also usable as one of many **programming [paradigms](paradigm.md)** -- a typical example of logic programming language is [Prolog](prolog.md).
**Power of logic is limited** (for more please read this excellent resource: http://humanknowledge.net/Thoughts.html) -- though logic is the strongest, most stable platform our knowledge can ever stand on, it is still not infinitely powerful and has its limits, despite what any reddit [atheist](atheism.md) tells you or even what he believes. This sadly [dooms](doom.md) us to certain eternal inability to uncover all there is, we just have to accept from a certain point we are blind and not even logic will help us. [Kurt Godel](godel.md) (along with others, e.g. Tarski) mathematically proved with his [incompleteness theorems](incompleteness.md) that we simply won't be able to prove everything, not even the validity of formal tools we use to prove things. See also [knowability](knowability.md). Even in just intuitive terms: on the lowest level we start using logic to talk about itself, i.e. if we e.g. try to prove that "logic works" using logical arguments, we cannot ever succeed, because if we succeed, the proven fact that "logic works" relies on the fact that logic indeed works; if it perhaps doesn't work and we used it to prove its own validity, we might have simply gotten a wrong result (it's just as if we trust someone saying "I am not a liar", he may as well be lying about not being a liar). By this logic even the previous sentence may or may not actually be true, we simply don't know, sometimes the best we can do is simply hold on to stronger or weaker beliefs. Imagine we have a function *isTrue(x)* that automatically checks if statement *x* is true (returns *true* or *false*), now image we have statement *y* that says *isTrue(y) = false*; our *isTrue* function will fail to correctly evaluate statement *y* (it can't return neither *true* nor *false*, both will lead to contradiction) -- this is a proof that there can never be a computable function that decides whether something is true or not. Logic furthermore cannot talk about many things; it can tell us how the world works but e.g. not WHY it works like it does. Checkmate [atheists](atheist.md).
**Power of logic is limited** (for more please read this excellent resource: http://humanknowledge.net/Thoughts.html) -- though logic presents the strongest and most stable platform for knowledge to stand on, it is still not infinitely powerful and indeed does have its limits, despite what any reddit [atheist](atheism.md) tells you or even what he believes. This sadly [dooms](doom.md) us to certain eternal inability to uncover all there is, we are forced to accept that from a certain point we are completely blind and not even logic will help us see further. [Kurt Godel](godel.md) (along with others, e.g. Tarski) mathematically proved, with his [incompleteness theorems](incompleteness.md), that we simply won't be able to prove everything, not even the validity of formal tools we use to prove things. More specifically he showed that there must exist statements whose truthfulness we'll be fundamentally unable to ever prove OR disprove, that we'll forever remain in uncertainty about their truthfulness, and that we won't even be able to prove that what we CAN prove is indeed correct because we cannot prove the logic we used for the proof is correct (for more details please see also [knowability](knowability.md)). Even just in intuitive terms: on the lowest level we start using logic to talk about itself, i.e. if we for instance try to prove that "logic works" using logical arguments, we cannot ever succeed, because if we succeed, the proven fact that "logic works" relies on the fact that logic indeed works; if it perhaps doesn't work and we used it to prove its own validity, we might have simply gotten a wrong result (it's just as if we trust someone saying "I am not a liar", he may as well be lying about not being a liar). By this logic even the previous sentence may or may not actually be true, we simply don't know, sometimes the best we can do is simply hold on to stronger or weaker beliefs. Imagine we have a function *isTrue(x)* that automatically checks if statement *x* is true (returns *true* or *false*), now image we have statement *y* that says *isTrue(y) = false*; our *isTrue* function will fail to correctly evaluate statement *y* (it can't return neither *true* nor *false*, both will lead to contradiction) -- this is a proof that there can never be a computable function that in all cases correctly decides whether something is true or not. Logic furthermore cannot talk about many other things; it can tell us how the world works but not for example WHY it works like it does or whether it will ever start working differently. Checkmate [atheists](atheist.md).
Are laws of logic inherent to every kind of existence, constant and unchanging under all possible conditions or are they specific to our [Universe](universe.md) and something we simply learn empirically? I.e. it seems logical that for example if *A* implies *B* and *A* holds, *B* will hold too -- but does it always have to be so or is it just so around our specific spacetime coordinates and we simply LEARN this rule, accepting it as a general interdimensional law? It seems logical that putting two individual [rocks](rock.md) together forms a single pair of rocks, but maybe in another universe putting two rocks together forms three rocks -- would beings in this universe have different laws of logic and different mathematics? This is probably a great philosophical question we can't satisfyingly answer here, but quite likely it may be the case that such questions [cannot be answered](knowability.md) at all.
## What Is Logic In Its Essence? How Universal Is It? And Other Mysteries
{ Thought diarrhea incoming, beware of unoriginal research. ~drummyfish }
Are laws of logic inherent to every kind of existence, constant and unchanging under all possible conditions or are they specific to our [Universe](universe.md) and something we simply learn empirically like anything else? Is logic fundamentally different from any other kind of knowledge or "skill"? I.e. it seems logical that for example if *A* implies *B* and *A* holds, *B* will hold too -- but does it always have to be so or is it just so around our specific spacetime coordinates and we simply LEARN this rule, accepting it as a general interdimensional law? It seems logical that putting two individual [rocks](rock.md) together forms a single pair of rocks, but maybe in another universe putting two rocks together forms three rocks -- would beings in this universe have different laws of logic and different mathematics? This is probably a great philosophical question we can't satisfyingly answer here, but quite likely it may be the case that such questions [cannot be answered](knowability.md) at all.
Indeed, what even is logic? It may be defined as a language, way of thought, the set of lowest level laws of [mathematics](math.md) and in many other ways, but how to grasp the true MEANING of what's logical and what isn't? Let us try to look at the problem from one possible perspective -- that of [computer science](compsci.md) -- and define logic as the most fundamental part of the [algorithm](algorithm.md) that our brains run, the most "basic code" for how a brain thinks. Logic to us is now just a "program" executed by our brains in order to make a decision in life (and note this will apply to computation in general without loss of generality, as computing any [number](number.md) can be broken down to deciding the value of its individual [binary](binary.md) digits). It is clear that each human's brain runs a slightly different algorithm due to different [DNA](dna.md), physical structure of brain matter, upbringing, life experience, learned biases and so on, meaning there are many problems that different humans solve (decide, compute, ...) differently. Logic is however the part of this grand algorithm that is somehow shared by at least MOST humans, i.e. it's that part of the algorithm that decides problems so that MOST humans will agree on the solution (because they share the "decision code" and so presented with the same input have to arrive at the same output). In this sense we might view logic as a "[BIOS](bios.md)" or perhaps an "[operating system](os.md)" that comes preinstalled in all brains and serves the purpose of a "platform", enabling us to acquire more knowledge ("install more software") -- it's a very universal code and so it's the same for (almost) everyone, and as the brains live, they use logic to deduce new knowledge, to "install" and "personalize" the whole brain software, but the basic code at the bottom remains, and that is logic. Now it is also clear that there are humans, whom we might call "insane" or "stupid", who use faulty logic or don't accept or understand basic logic, and the same probably goes for almost all animals -- these individuals simply have a different "base code" of logic. This is in line with the "you can't argue with a retard" rule, it IS impossible to force someone to believe logic if he simply refuses to, you can't logically prove your logic correct if you're using the very same logic for the proof.
Where did this "base code" in brain come from? It probably [evolved](evolution.md) like anything else: by natural selection. We, with the kind of logic we all use, are the result of nature's long trial and error process leading to organisms that survive and reproduce. In other words we could say that logic isn't anything magical and different from any other knowledge, but simply a "[good enough](good_enough.md)" universal algorithm, which when installed in an organism's brain leads to the organism surviving and thriving, mainly because this base code allows adaptation, deduction and acquiring of new [abstract](abstraction.md) knowledge. Note the term "good enough" however: it's used to show that our logic may indeed be faulty and fail sometimes, and like mentioned above, we cannot ever prove correctness of our own logic, we use it simply because "[it works](just_werks.md)" for us, but it may be the case that our logic would fail us in other parts of the universe, that we could mathematically prove a falsehood true. By this we can hypothesize that logic, like other very basic brain functions, is "preprogrammed" and "hard wired" in a newborn's brain, instilled by evolution, and that's why we all share logic and can agree on what's fundamentally logical. It could even theoretically be possible that our civilization's logic is incorrect and a mutation occurred in some lone human to use a different, CORRECT system of logic, but we see him as a schizophrenic and lock him up in an asylum, when he's in fact right and the whole world is wrong.
We don't know if our logic is always correct or not, we only know it's useful to us, but we DO know (from the incompleteness theorems) that our logic is limited and will be unusable to prove certain specific problems. And this immediately begs the question: is our logic the only possible one? Could there be an organism that would have evolved a different kind of logic, perhaps one that could prove the problems we cannot prove with our logic? All points to the answer that yes, this is possible, but then of course this new logic will have its own set of undecidable problems, ones that OUR logic may be able to decide. But wait -- if we met with the aliens with this kind of different logic, couldn't we collaborate on deciding ALL problems? Couldn't they solve our undecidable problem for us in return solving theirs? No, we couldn't understand each other's logic and we couldn't trust their solutions, it might well be that we meet aliens with faulty logic and the solutions they provide to us would be wrong -- remember, we couldn't verify correctness of solutions to our undecidable problems with our logic. This also make sense if we imagine us and the aliens forming a new metaorganism that uses a new kind of logic, or ALGORITHM, by merging our logic and the aliens' -- in the end a combination of algorithms is again a single algorithm and therefore must also suffer the curse of undecidablity etc. So to summarize:
- Out logic most likely came from evolution.
- We don't know if our logic is correct.
- We know it is useful and so we assume it's at least mostly correct.
- We know our logic is limited (won't be able to answer some questions).
- There can probably exist different systems of logic, similar to our own.
- Trying to use many different systems of logic together however won't help, in the end any merger is just a new logic with its own flaws.
Let's now poke a bit on specific examples of different logic systems, demonstrated by a table:
| logic | values | correct? |
| ---------------------------------------------- | -------------------------- | ------------------- |
| ground truth (undecidable, answers everything) | `100110101100010011010...` | yes, by definition |
| logic A (answers nothing) | `?????????????????????...` | yes, can't be wrong |
| logic B (always tries to give an answer) | `011000111010011100010...` | no, can't be |
| logic C (answers something) | `??????1????0?????0?1?...` | yes |
| logic D (negation of logic C) | `??????0????1?????1?0?...` | no |
| logic E (answers something) | `10010?101100?10011?10...` | yes |
| logic F (answers something) | `100?001011000100?1?10...` | yes |
| logic G (similar to logic F) | `100?011011001100?1?10...` | no |
| ... | ... | ... |
The *logic* column lists a selection of possible logic systems (correct or not), and the first one is *ground truth*, i.e. the definitive correct answer to all decision problems, which however cannot be attained in our universe due to incompleteness theorems -- it serves here as a reference to compare other systems of logic to. The *values* column shows an answer to some subset of questions we might ask -- each question has a definitive answer `1` (true) or `0` (false), given by *ground truth*, but logic systems are allowed to also answer `?`, or "I don't know". This is very important because by definition ANY computable logic that always gives a definitive `1`/`0` answer, like *logic B*, HAS TO be wrong at least in some cases, and so the only systems that can be correct are those that sometimes admit they don't know the answer, i.e. output `?`. This proves *logic A* correct as that simply always answers `?`, it's practically equivalent to a lack of logic -- if you never answer, you can never be wrong. Then there is *logic C* that demonstrates this: it answers only a few questions but always correctly (maybe it's not very powerful and only limits itself to answering just very trivial questions). Our human logic could perhaps be *logic E*: it answers many questions but also doesn't know ALL of the answers, which is a prerequisite for correctness. The alien logic might be *logic F*, which is very similar and differs in (correctly) answering some of our (*logic E's*) questions, but for giving up the ability to answer something we can. Now note *logic G* that's almost the same as *logic F* -- it might be yet a different alien civilization logic -- it similarly answers some of our unanswerable questions, but WRONGLY, and this is why we can't trust the aliens: for us there is no way to decide if we should trust *logic F* or *logic G* on questions where their answers differ. And note here that *logic G* itself also can't know that it's incorrect, it's giving many correct answers but also a few wrong ones, and from evolutionary perspective this may not matter because they may be highly abstract questions unimportant for survival, and so it may well be the case that our logic is *logic G*: a good, useful logic, but sometimes a faulty one, and we locked a poor innocent man in an asylum.
## See Also

2
main.md
View file

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

3808
random_page.md
View file

File diff suppressed because it is too large Load diff

91
stereotype.md
View file

@ -13,10 +13,12 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- countries change constantly, never ending revolutions and civil wars, extremely corrupt governments and presidents
- peak suffering: hunger, [AIDS](aids.md), malaria, no [education](education.md), no healthcare, no water, flies will eat you alive (unless elephant kills you or you step on a cobra), ...
- those who sail the seas are modern pirates
- weird fashion: bones in ears, huge discs in lips, neck rings etc.
- weird fashion: bones in ears, huge discs in lips, neck rings, crocodile scars etc.
- poverty beyond imagination, 99% illiterate, capital cities look like hobo sites on any other continent, average citizen makes a maximum of 1 cent per day
- speaking extremely broken [English](english.md)
- named probably Barak, Muntu or something like that
- can be a good sprinter or marathon runner, normal professions include: safari guide for tourists, president of the country, poacher or anti-pouching guard
- national musical instrument is vuvuzela
- named probably Barak, Muntu, Xixao or something like that
- **Egyptians**:
- DO NOT DRINK THE WATER
- Egypt basically consists of three things: the Nile river, the Pyramids and the Sphinx, otherwise it's just sand
@ -42,10 +44,10 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- wild west, survival of the fittest, they have highest tech weapons but mentality comparable to cavemen
- probably named John McDonald
- [aliens](ufo.md) always attack USA first
- **California**: weed, surfers, hippies, [SJWs](swj.md), Hollywood hype
- **California**: weed, surfers, [hippies](hippies.md), [SJWs](swj.md), Hollywood hype
- **Florida**: old people, everyone moves there for retirement, constant holidays and fun
- **Indians** (red skinned natives): one with the nature, drunk, lazy, own casinos, perform rituals involving dancing around fire, headbands of feathers, weapon of choice is tomahawk, scalp their enemies, as ghosts fuck with people who build houses on their burial grounds
- **Texas**: oil magnates wearing cowboy hats, boots and colts, only listen to country
- **Texas**: cigar smoking oil magnates wearing cowboy hats, boots and colts, only listen to country, ultra right wing
- **US south**: slow, even more stupid, ultra right, [racist](racism.md), rednecks, inbred, live in trailers, for slavery, for guns, listen to country, very typical accent
- **Antarctica**:
- no stereotypes yet, wait maybe four or five centuries
@ -56,6 +58,7 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- bearded men dressed in carpets, women walk completely covered in bed sheets just with holes for eyes
- [pedophiles](pedophilia.md), bigamists, goat fuckers
- some may be rich oil sheikhs
- obsessed with carpets, some can even fly on them
- weapon of choice is dagger or that weird curved sword, also acid to the face or bomb
- on plane make everyone nervous
- names: Ahmed, Muhammad, Ali, Abdul, Aladin, ...
@ -64,14 +67,15 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- smart, wise, have proverbs about everything
- do martial arts, able to levitate by power of will
- eat bats, [cats](cat.md) and [dogs](dog.md)
- executions are part of daily life
- firing squad executions are part of daily life
- names sound as if you throw a pot down the stairs
- somehow managed to merge """[communism](communism.md)""" with [ultracapitalism](capitalism.md), result of which is a surveillance dystopia that's a nightmare to live in
- make crappy off brands and cheap copies of western art, steal "intellectual property", manufacture cheap things at large quantities, everything is "made in China"
- don't value "human [rights](rights_culture.md)", no work safety, elevators and escalators kill everyone
- obsessed with fireworks and dragons, especially when celebrating their weird animal-named years
- ping-pong masters
- stereotypical look: wear conical hats, have large front teeth and extremely slanted eyes
- play some weirdass one-string instruments whose name no one remembers
- stereotypical look: bright yellow skin, wear conical hats, have large front teeth and extremely slanted eyes
- skin is more yellow compared to other asians
- top two [colors](color.md) are red and gold
- no one will help you emergency, if you are dying in the streets people will just walk by and not notice you { This is very well known on gore sites, it's not even a stereotype but basically a fact apparent from watching many videos of accidents, it may be related to the eastern culture of "not minding the others' business". The phenomenon itself is NOT unique to china, it's known to psychology, called *diffusion of responsibility*, however in China it is very strong and even appears in situations without crowds of people. I don't want to describe the graphic videos in detail, but it's basically the case that people will for example keep filming their friend drowning from up close, when he absolutely clearly needs helps, they just will not help. This may be important to know when traveling to China, knowing you can't rely on others helping you in emergency may save your life -- if you need help, call very clearly for help and address someone in specific to help you. ~drummyfish }
@ -87,7 +91,9 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- hentai, weird porn often involving tentacles and lolis
- can't say "l", they replace it with "r", and they end every word with "u"
- bizarre [TV](tv.md) shows
- pot haircut
- short, pale and fragile, bad at strength sports
- wear kimono
- disciplined, hard working, educated people, everything is clean and tidy, zero criminality, people have hobbies such as origami, bug collecting or growing bonsai trees
- [anime](anime.md) absolutely everywhere
- all women are sexy cute lolis wearing schoolgirl uniforms and make ideals wives: absolutely faithful and subdued to their husband, diligently maintain household, never complain, never express opinions
@ -112,18 +118,20 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- tough men, living surrounded by extremely dangerous animals such as flying spiders, fight crocodiles every day
- walk on their heads
- hunt with boomerangs, play didgeridoo
- flushing the toilet spins the water in the opposite direction than in the rest of the world
- ride kangaroos
- flushing the toilet spins the water in the opposite direction than in the rest of the world, proving that [science](science.md) is real
- **[Earth](earth.md)**:
- no stereotypes yet (until we establish colonies on other planets)
- **[European](europe.md)**:
- old and cultivated culture, class, nobility -- Europe is to the world what UK is to Europe
- things are more "sane" and balanced compared to the US
- things are more "sane", reasonable, stable and balanced compared to the US
- socialists and [communists](communism.md) (from US perspective)
- europoor (also from US perspective)
- uncut penises
- **Austria**:
- You mean Australia?
- You mean Germany?
- men often look like the typical Austria-Hungary officer with moustache and sabre sword
- men often look like the stereotypical Austria-Hungary officer with moustache and sabre sword
- skiing, schnitzel
- **Belgians**:
- You mean French?
@ -143,10 +151,11 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- tall anorexic slendermen
- everyone wears weird wooden shoes
- **English**:
- well behaved, polite, reserved, educated, classy, formal
- conservative, old fashioned
- well mannered, polite, reserved, educated, classy, formal, will stick to formalities even in face of death
- conservative, old fashioned, hold on to medieval laws just because
- drink tea
- dry humor
- monarchists, FOR THE QUEEN
- [football](football.md) fans, additionally also practice incomprehensible sports/games like cricket and bridge
- dislike French
- bad cuisine
@ -158,14 +167,15 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- lazy, Bohemian life, hate [work](work.md)
- eat baguettes, croissants and frogs (and other disgusting stuff like snails), drink wine exclusively
- dislike Brits
- revolutionaries, constantly protest, strikes
- artists, intellectuals
- arrogant, annoying snobs, kinda [gay](gay.md), "o la la!"
- wear long curvy moustache, play accordion
- revolutionaries, constantly protest, strikes on the daily basis just for the heck of it
- play accordion, may have a cigarette in his mouth
- artists, intellectuals, always discuss politics, philosophy and [art](art.md)
- arrogant, annoying snobs, look [gay](gay.md), "o la la!"
- wear long curvy moustache, black and white striped shirt and beret (that weird kind of hat)
- in war always surrender
- language sounds funny as hell, but women love it
- **Germans**:
- no sense of [humor](fun.md), being kind of robots
- no sense of [humor](fun.md), being kind of human robots
- precise, efficient, organized, great technology, best engineers
- their language has very long words and rough sounds with many Rs, Ds etc., so it can't be used to describe things such as pleasant feelings
- cannibals
@ -177,9 +187,9 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- men are named Hans or Horst, women have horrific names such as GERTRUDE
- **Hispanics**:
- telenovelas
- sexual dances like tango and samba
- sexual dances like tango, samba and penetrata
- always happy, enjoy life, very social, passionate, horny
- huge families
- huge families, very frequent gatherings and celebrations
- **Irish**:
- tough
- drunk and violent
@ -188,7 +198,7 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- very passionate, have heated emotional arguments even over trivial things
- in one way or another always involved with mafia
- family above everything, know and regularly meet very distant relatives at family gatherings
- have mustaches
- have moustaches
- love pizza and pasta, men are great cooks
- talk with hands
- mamma mia, spaghetti pasta al dente
@ -224,11 +234,13 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- **Spanish**:
- extroverted, social, passionate, hot blooded, dance flamenco
- take naps on siesta, literally sleep on work
- bullfighters
- bullfighters (toreadors)
- attractive tanned men
- play guitar and castanets
- men must be named Antonio, Jose, Juan or Jorge, women are always named Maria
- do crazy shit like let an angry bull loose in the streets so that it murders a few random people, then they murder the bull, what a [fun](fun.md) activity
- men must be named Antonio, Jose, Juan or Jorge, women are practically always named Maria (or possibly Esmeralda)
- **Eskimos** (also Nanook):
- live near north pole in igloos, surrounded by polar bears and penguins (despite the fact penguins only live in the southern hemisphere)
- have ten thousand different words for snow and/or color [white](white.md)
- **Indians** (India):
- extremely friendly, often too much
@ -237,8 +249,10 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- good at [IT](it.md) but usually tech support scammers
- spiritual, peaceful, meditate a lot, do yoga
- don't know what work safety means
- obsessed with selfies and social media, stalkers
- transport gigantic loads on bicycles or small motorcycles
- "car horn is the national bird of India"
- gurus, fakirs or snake charmers
- Bollywood, hilarious and bizarre music and TV shows
- **other countries**:
- **Brazilian**:
@ -257,10 +271,11 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- drugs
- **Israeli**: see the jewish race
- **Mexican**:
- all wear ponchos, sombreros and mustaches
- all wear ponchos, large sombreros and mustaches
- drink tequila all day
- have spiciest food on [Earth](earth.md) that would kill any non-Mexican, most meals consist of beans, tortillas and tacos
- lazy, poor, dirty, drugs and crime, violence, cruel life
- Mariachi: small groups of musicians playing (usually guitars) and singing in the streets -- if they're not around, you're not in Mexico
- constantly trying to get over US borders to steal their jobs
- those already in the US are always illegal and work basically as slaves, e.g. cleaners, nannies, janitors etc.
- weapon of choice is machete
@ -269,7 +284,7 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- **Russian**:
- very tough, big and strong, endure conditions that would kill other people (such as extreme cold or very high doses of alcohol), keep pet bears
- poor peasants
- don't smile or show emotion in general
- never smile or show emotion in general
- drunk (especially by vodka), aggressive, rude
- wear Adidas pants
- men are big and tall, with heavy eyebrows and hairy body, women are pale beauties
@ -279,6 +294,7 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- Marxist communists, USSR, soviet [pride](pride.md)
- food sucks, national food is something like boiled grass
- good at [chess](chess.md)
- plays balalaika
- babushkas everywhere
- will NEVER, under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES learn [English](english.md), which is why for every website there is a Russian version of it
- named Sasha (Alexander), Boris, Andrei, Misha, Ivan or Vlad, the only two existing women names in Russia are Anastasia and Natasha
@ -307,18 +323,20 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- **[black](nigger.md)** (also negro or "afroamerican"):
- unintelligent, stupid, uneducated, lazy, primitive, poor, dirty, thieves and criminals
- physically fit, good at sports, run very fast, play basketball
- good at music, especially rhythmic music, [jazz](jazz.md) and rap
- good at music, especially rhythmic music, gospel, [jazz](jazz.md) and rap, play drums, bass, saxophone or piano (but then he must be blind)
- fathers leave their children
- all look the same, similar to monkeys, big lips afro hairstyle
- have gigantic dicks
- love chicken and watermelon
- in certain situations act like monkeys (so called chimp out), e.g. when excited they start jumping around like crazy, or when scared instinctively react by punching the perceived danger
- racist towards whites
- [blackout](blackout.md) means all black immediately run out to loot the stores
- in horror movies always die first
- says "[nigger](nigger.md)" in every sentence but gets extremely pissed if someone non-black says the word even once
- in other movies they are tokens for the inclusivity quotas (in South Park the black guy's name is literally Token)
- classic stereotypes such as big lips, "big momma", cotton slaves etc.
- classic stereotypes such as big lips, "big momma", cotton slaves, street gangsta with stereos on his shoulder, rap star in a fur coat with gold chains on his neck etc.
- if he is smart, then it's "street smart"
- possible proffesions: pimp, drug dealer, thief, rapper, jazz musician, cotton slave, sprinter, none
- possible proffesions: pimp, drug dealer, thief, rapper, jazz musician, cotton slave, sprinter, basketball player, none
- women have gigantic asses
- very typical tone of voice, accent and body language, exagerrated hand and head gestures
- male names: probably something like Kofi, Bubba or Marsellus
@ -338,6 +356,7 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- greedy
- good at [business](business.md), filthy [capitalists](capitalism.md), just count [money](money.md) all day
- have the "eagle nose"
- wear sidelocks and yarmulke (also kippah, that weird tiny kind of hat)
- members of secret societies, closed jew-only communities, conspire for world control, some being [fascists](fascism.md) wanting to become the ruling race
- spread everywhere like rats
- can adapt to any environment
@ -460,21 +479,27 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- always wear suit and briefcase, even if it should be stuffed with hay
- **managers**:
- manipulative psychopathic subhumans, power hungry, cocksucing greedy materialists with zero empathy or sense of morality, only follow [money](money.md)
- think that everything can be solved or accelerated by throwing more money at it
- know absolutely nothing about the industry they manage, only obsessed with [productivity](productivity_cult.md) of their slaves whom they push to overtimes and shitty [working](work.md) conditions for low pay
- think that everything can be solved or accelerated by throwing more [money](money.md) at it
- know absolutely nothing about the industry they manage (or anything else really), only obsessed with [productivity](productivity_cult.md) of their slaves whom they push to overtimes and shitty [working](work.md) conditions for low pay
- annoying, embodiment of [evil](evil.md), everyone hates them, kill all good ideas
- busy 100% of the time, always on the phone (handsfree earbuds), just moving between meetings, wear luxury suits and drive expensive cars
- use [buzzwords](buzzword.md), [marketing](marketing.md) speech, technobabble and jargon to appear qualified and cover up their incompetence
- listen to motivational speeches before sleep, motivational posters cover whole walls of their offices
- WHITEBOARD MEETING NOW!
- wants to see tables, charts powepoint presentations and hear new ideas, even if it's absolute bullshit, just give him new charts every day
- shark, only going FORWARD!
- don't actually do anything, are absolutely unnecessary but have highest pay and steal all the credit
- is actually dead inside and his personal relationships are always on the verge of destruction, but he keeps running from it by yelling at others, faking happiness, overspending at luxury, sex and drugs
- fuck secretaries
- **mathematicians**:
- unusable in [real life](irl.md)
- absentminded, have [autism](autism.md), asperger's or other kind of [insanity](disease.md)
- absentminded, have [autism](autism.md), schizophrenia, asperger's or other kind of [insanity](disease.md)
- introverted and socially awkward to the max, don't know how to talk to people
- weird as fuck, can be completely robotic or laugh uncontrollably at random occasions
- obsessed with chalk
- for some reason write equations on window sheets
- can't understand anything that can't be described by equations, such as emotions
- at one point may walk into the woods and start living as a hermit
- random hobbies such as juggling or card tricks
- **millennials**:
- something between boomers and zoomers?
@ -490,14 +515,20 @@ Some stereotypes are:
- academic slaves
- sleep deprived and hungry all the time, no money, impostor syndrome
- publish publish publish publish publish
- NOVELTY, INNOVATION, STATE OF THE ART, MUST MAKE A POSTER FOR MY PAPER ELSE I STARVE
- ponytail
- **physicists**:
- popularly regarded as greatest geniuses, despite just being second grade mathematicians
- what an engineer is to physicist a physicist is to mathematician
- can't comprehend [infinity](infinity.md)
- best candidate for "science popularizator", quantum this and quantum that, we're all made of star dust kinds! like and subscribe
- **policemen**:
- stupid
- fat
- eat doughnuts
- biased against blacks
- **[politicians](politics.md)**:
- worst human scum, corrupt, populist, talk only lies, backstab anyone, play dirty games
- worst human scum, corrupt, populist, talk only lies and more lies on top, backstab anyone, play dirty games
- are able to speak for prolonged periods of time without actually saying anything
- expensive suits, cars, houses, even if people are starving
- fat and ugly

2
wiki_pages.md
View file

File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long

68
wiki_stats.md
View file

@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
- number of articles: 644
- number of commits: 1040
- total size of all texts in bytes: 5630618
- total number of lines of article texts: 40435
- number of commits: 1041
- total size of all texts in bytes: 5634814
- total number of lines of article texts: 40446
- number of script lines: 324
- occurrences of the word "person": 10
- occurrences of the word "nigger": 164
@ -20,8 +20,8 @@ longest articles:
- [capitalism](capitalism.md): 76K
- [faq](faq.md): 76K
- [less_retarded_society](less_retarded_society.md): 72K
- [3d_rendering](3d_rendering.md): 56K
- [woman](woman.md): 56K
- [3d_rendering](3d_rendering.md): 56K
- [main](main.md): 52K
- [programming_language](programming_language.md): 48K
- [c](c.md): 44K
@ -35,31 +35,31 @@ longest articles:
top 50 5+ letter words:
- which (3018)
- which (3020)
- there (2378)
- people (2248)
- people (2249)
- example (1947)
- other (1722)
- about (1537)
- about (1539)
- number (1477)
- software (1340)
- because (1268)
- their (1196)
- something (1176)
- would (1153)
- being (1135)
- their (1197)
- something (1178)
- would (1154)
- being (1136)
- program (1091)
- language (1040)
- called (1011)
- called (1012)
- things (960)
- without (938)
- without (940)
- simple (908)
- function (888)
- numbers (884)
- computer (879)
- different (850)
- world (830)
- these (819)
- these (820)
- programming (814)
- however (811)
- should (793)
@ -67,28 +67,40 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
- system (779)
- doesn (758)
- games (743)
- drummyfish (741)
- drummyfish (743)
- always (739)
- possible (734)
- point (722)
- https (714)
- probably (709)
- probably (710)
- while (699)
- society (697)
- simply (694)
- society (698)
- simply (695)
- using (668)
- someone (656)
- course (652)
- someone (657)
- course (654)
- similar (640)
- actually (639)
- first (625)
- value (619)
- first (629)
- value (620)
- though (600)
- really (598)
latest changes:
```
Date: Tue Jul 8 23:03:00 2025 +0200
cope.md
dog.md
free_speech.md
licar.md
lrs.md
lrs_wiki.md
racetrack.md
random_page.md
wiki_pages.md
wiki_stats.md
woman.md
Date: Sun Jul 6 09:01:22 2025 +0200
acronym.md
free_speech.md
@ -110,18 +122,6 @@ Date: Sat Jul 5 08:29:04 2025 +0200
game.md
human_language.md
interesting.md
licar.md
needed.md
optimism.md
programming_language.md
random_page.md
usa.md
wiki_pages.md
wiki_stats.md
Date: Wed Jul 2 00:23:26 2025 +0200
distance.md
random_page.md
wiki_pages.md
```
most wanted pages:

2
work.md
View file

@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ For lawyer cunts: we officially DO NOT ADVISE any illegal methods mentioned here
- **Saving [money](money.md)**: obviously, saving a lot of money makes one able to retire soon. Watch out for inflation that destroys savings, it's nice to put some part of it e.g. in gold so that it keeps the value.
- **Begging**: in some regions beggars make very good money, sometimes even more than a regular salary. Trying to look like a "street artist" may help, however just asking people NICELY for money will probably work in bigger cities where people can afford the expense. Again, be NICE, don't smell or look disgusting, DO NOT be drunk or smell by alcohol, say you need it for food or accommodation, don't fight with people who shittalk you, just politely leave and ask someone else. Find tricks that work (e.g. asking a couple may be more successful as the guy won't want to seem like a greedy bastard in front of the lady). Watch out for for places where this may be illegal. Change your spots or even cities often so that you don't become a annoying to the degree that someone would want to get you removed.
- **Some professions come with long holidays**, typically e.g. teachers get about two months off each year, so you can try to find something like this. Also some seasonal work and so on. In some countries an employer is required to still pay you a portion of salary even if there is no work to be done and you have to stay at home -- you can strategically search for work in an industry that is going to stagnate.
- **Getting a disability pension**: if you are really disabled then you've already won, otherwise either fake it or bribe a doctor (e.g. with sex). As a desperate move a capitalist slave may even go as far as trying to cripple himself on purpose to avoid remaining slave for his whole life, however we can't downright recommend this as of course this can backfire in many ways. One possible way of doing so might be e.g. stopping eating and becoming anorexic (to many a whole life of freedom would be worth a few months of starving). On tubgurl image board one reader suggested the following: just keep shitting your pants -- no one will want to hire you plus they will judge you must be retarded. Another idea is to just stop talking altogether, not a single word to anyone, you will probably be labeled a severe autist.
- **Getting a disability pension**: if you are really disabled then you've already won, otherwise either fake it or bribe a doctor (e.g. with sex). As a desperate move a capitalist slave may even go as far as trying to cripple himself on purpose to avoid remaining slave for his whole life (so called self mutilation, a technique used by soldiers to avoid duty), however we can't downright recommend this as of course this can backfire in many ways. One possible way of doing so might be e.g. stopping eating and becoming anorexic (to many a whole life of freedom would be worth a few months of starving). On tubgurl image board one reader suggested the following: just keep shitting your pants -- no one will want to hire you plus they will judge you must be retarded. Another idea is to just stop talking altogether, not a single word to anyone, you will probably be labeled a severe autist.
- **Striking as often as possible**: going on strikes as often as it is possible over everything is cool, one gets a holiday and hurts the employing company.
- **Faking sickness or getting sick on purpose**: for an employee it is possible to pretend to be sick to avoid work, to bribe doctor or break one's leg on purpose to stay at home and leech the employer and state is a possibility (of course we don't advice you to hurt yourself, just saying it's possible). If one just keeps breaking his leg over and over to avoid work, they will also likely give him some mental disease diagnosis and a disability pension so that he can stay at home indefinitely.
- **Leeching welfare/neetbux**: it's a common practice to e.g. register at the employment office and then just take unemployment support. There are many other potential sources of state money, like the widow pension, money for children etc.