Update

books.md

@@ -5,6 +5,7 @@ Here there will be a constantly WIP list of [books](book.md) that might be of in
 { Let's aim for quality rather than quantity here, don't put any book that has some connection to our cause here, but rather the ones you've read and which you judge as a quality book that enriched you in some way. ~drummyfish }
 
 - **Blackout** (2017, Elsberg): Fiction, telling a story of a large blackout in Europe that shows to really be caused by [bloated](bloat.md) tech. For [collapse](collapse.md) enjoyers this is an interesting read if only for the detailed description of the consequences a sudden loss of electric power.
+- **Day of the Triffids** (1951, Wyndham): Excellent sci-fi in which civilization comes to an end due to a disaster (won't spoil), very nice for collapse preps or just people enjoying a great story narrated in captivating way :-) The movie is a joke, don't even search for it.
 - **Einstein: His Life and Universe** (Isaacson, 2008): [Einstein](einstein.md)'s biography, quite a nice read about a pretty awesome man who's image has been so distorted by the mainstream shit. 
 - **Encyclopedia Britannica 11th edition** (1911): Extremely large, old, uncensored [encyclopedia](encyclopedia.md), mostly digitized and fulltext searchable, also completely [public domain](public_domain.md), with very long articles on all topics up to the date of its publication. Great source of lesser known information and an alternative to modern censored sources. Also check out other similar encyclopedias.
 - **Flatland** (Abbott, 1884): Absolutely amazing fantasy story set in two dimensional land with characters being geometric shapes, while being a critic of society to a big degree, it discusses practical and mathematical aspects of actually living in two dimensions, how the characters see, how they build their houses etc. It is now absolutely [public domain](public_domain.md)!

democracy.md

@@ -11,6 +11,6 @@ Also nowadays democracy has mostly degenerated to "let's bully those who disagre
 Small brain simplification of democracy to mere "voting" may be highly ineffective and even dangerous. Democracy was actually considered to be very weak or even downright bad by many Greek philosophers such as Plato and Aristotle. We have to realize that **sometimes voting is awesome, but sometimes it's an extremely awful idea**. Why? Consider the two following scenarios:
 
 - **On simple issues wisdom of the crowd work very well**, as demonstrated by the famous experiment in which averaging guesses of many people on a number of beans in a jar resulted in an extremely precise estimate, a much more precise than any man alone could give. This is an example of when voting is the superior solution to making a decision.
-- **Non-experts voting on complex issues and voting on issues requiring large vision is a disaster** (which is why we mostly don't have direct democracy but rather representative one). Many retarded rightists believe direct democracy would somehow be "better" -- no, it would be indeed be infinitely worse to let braindead rednecks vote on complex issues. When a [chess](chess.md) grandmaster plays against thousands of people who make moves by voting, the master easily wins, as demonstrated e.g. by the Karpov vs the World (or Twitch plays Pokémon lol) experiment (later projects such as Kasparov vs the World had to somehow moderate and filter the move votes to give the world a chance). The reason is that the majority of weak moves voted by non-experts outweight the few good votes of experts, but also ADDITIONALLY even if only expert votes are takes, the result may be inferior because different long-term plans and visions will collide with the long term plans of others, which is probably the reason why e.g. Romans used to elect a single dictator in times of a crisis rather than relying on a council of experts. In such cases democracy may be similar to wanting to create a nice picture by averaging all pictures ever made by all people, the result will probably be just an ugly gray noisy blob (imagine e.g. creating a picture by having many pictures "vote" on color of every pixel simply by voting for the color they have on the same pixel position { Actually I've tried this now and yes, it looks just like a noisy gray blob. ~drummyfish } ). This is why it's a very bad idea to have people vote directly e.g. on complex economic or diplomatic issues. We have to say [we](we.md) do NOT advocate for dictators (we are anarchists) -- we rather believe in implementing a [decentralized](decentralization.md), self-regulating society in which we avoid the need for any dictators or governments.
+- **Non-experts voting on complex issues and voting on issues requiring large vision is a disaster** (which is why we mostly don't have direct democracy but rather representative one). Many retarded rightists believe direct democracy would somehow be "better" -- no, it would indeed be infinitely worse to let braindead rednecks vote on complex issues. When a [chess](chess.md) grandmaster plays against thousands of people who make moves by voting, the master easily wins, as demonstrated e.g. by the Karpov vs the World (or Twitch plays Pokémon lol) experiment (later projects such as Kasparov vs the World had to somehow moderate and filter the move votes to give the world a chance). The reason is that the majority of weak moves voted by non-experts outweight the few good votes of experts, but also ADDITIONALLY even if only expert votes are takes, the result may be inferior because different long-term plans and visions will collide with the long term plans of others, which is probably the reason why e.g. Romans used to elect a single dictator in times of a crisis rather than relying on a council of experts. In such cases democracy may be similar to wanting to create a nice picture by averaging all pictures ever made by all people, the result will probably be just an ugly gray noisy blob (imagine e.g. creating a picture by having many pictures "vote" on color of every pixel simply by voting for the color they have on the same pixel position { Actually I've tried this now and yes, it looks just like a noisy gray blob. ~drummyfish } ). This is why it's a very bad idea to have people vote directly e.g. on complex economic or diplomatic issues. We have to say [we](we.md) do NOT advocate for dictators (we are anarchists) -- we rather believe in implementing a [decentralized](decentralization.md), self-regulating society in which we avoid the need for any dictators or governments.
 
-The democracy **[paradox](paradox.md)**: what happens when it is democratically decided that democracy is not a good tool for decision making? I.e. what if democracy denies its own validity?If we believe democracy is valid, then we have to accept its decision and stop believing in democracy, but then if we stop believing in democracy we can just reject the original decision because it was made by something that's not to be trusted, but then...
+The democracy **[paradox](paradox.md)**: what happens when it is democratically decided that democracy is not a good tool for decision making? I.e. what if democracy denies its own validity? If we believe democracy is valid, then we have to accept its decision and stop believing in democracy, but then if we stop believing in democracy we can just reject the original decision because it was made by something that's not to be trusted, but then...

encyclopedia.md

@@ -35,14 +35,17 @@ Here is a list of notable encyclopedias, focused on general knowledge English la
 | Domestic Encyclopaedia         | 1802  | PD (old)         | 4 vol.      |           | shorter articles, partially digitized on Wikisource                                                        |
 | Encyclopedia Americana         |1820...| PD (old)         | ~30 vol.    |           | longer articles, one of "Big Three", several editions (1906, 1920) partly digitized on wikisource          | 
 | Encyclopedia Dramatica         |2004...| PD (CC0)         | online      | 15K       | informal/fun/"offensive" but valuable info (on society, tech, ...), basically no censorship, no propaganda |    
+| Encyclopedia of Marxism        |1999...| CC BY-SA         | online      | ~3K       | focused on Marxism, quality, shorter articles                                                              |
 | Everybodywiki                  |2017...| CC BY-SA         | online      | ~300K     | alternative to Wikipedia allowing articles on non notable things and people                                |
 | Google Knol                    | ~2010 | proprietary      | online      |           | failed online enc. by Google, archived on archive.org                                                      |
 | Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia| 2003  | proprietary      | CD          |           |                                                                                                            |
 |Illustrated Family Encyclopedia | 1997  | proprietary      | 2 vol. 920p | 5K        | kid-friendly, nice pictures, USA bias, piratable                                                           |
 |[Infogalactic](infogalactic.md) |2016...| CC BY-SA         | online      | 2M        | Wikipedia fork, no SJW censorship, FOR PROFIT (you can buy article control lol), can't make accounts       |
+| [Leftypedia](leftypedia.md)    |2020...| GFDL             | online      | ~200      | Leftist encyclopedia, currently NOT littered by SJWs, writing about all branches of the "left"             |
 | [LRS wiki](lrs_wiki.md)        |2021...| PD (CC0)         | online/elec.| 500       | best encyclopedia, focused on tech/society, no censorship                                                  | 
 | [Metapedia](metapedia.md)      |2006...| GFDL             | online      | 7K        | Wikipedia fork, online, no SJW censorship, ATM limited account creation, "pro-European" fascism            |
 |Microsoft [Encarta](encarta.md) |...2009| proprietary      | electronic  | 62K       | Micro$oft enc., low quality articles (errors), MS propaganda (no free software etc. lol), is on archive.org|
+| [ProleWiki](prolewiki.md)      |2020...| proprietary      | online      | ~3K       | Proletariat wiki, similar to Leftypedia but focused on Marxism-Leninism.                                   | 
 | Simple English Wikipedia       |2001...| CC BY-SA         | online      | 200K      | Wikipedia with simpler language and simpler explanations, censored                                         |
 | The New American Cyclopaedia   | 1879  | PD (old)         | 16 vol.     |           | partially digitized on Wikisource (txt)                                                                    |
 | The New International Encyc.   | 1905  | PD (old)         | 20 vol.     |           | partially digitized on Wikisource                                                                          |

git.md

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ It is generally considered quite a good software, many praise its distributed na
 
 **Is git literally [hitler](hitler.md)?** Well, by [suckless](suckless.md) standards git IS bloated and yes, git IS complicated as fuck, however let's try to go deeper and ask the important questions, namely "does this matter so much?" and "should I use git or avoid it like the devil?". The answer is actually this: it doesn't matter too much that git is bloated and you don't have to avoid using it. Why? Well, git is basically just a way of hosting, spreading and mirroring your source onto many git-hosting servers (i.e. you can't avoid using git if you want to spread your code to e.g. Codeberg and GitLab) AND at the same time git doesn't create a [dependency](dependency.md) for your project, i.e. its shittiness doesn't "infect" your project -- if git dies or if you simply want to start using something else, you just copy-paste your source code elsewhere, you put it on [FTP](ftp.md) or anything else, no problem. It's similar to how e.g. [Anarch](anarch.md) uses [SDL](sdl.md) (which is bloated as hell) to run on specific platforms -- if it doesn't hard-depend on SDL and doesn't get tied to it, it's OK (and actually unavoidable) to make use of it. You also don't even have to get into the complicated stuff about git (like merging branches and resolving conflicts) when you're simply committing to a simple one-man project.
 
-**Which git hosting to use?** All of them (except for [GitHub](github.md) which is a proprietary terrorist site)! Do not fall into the trap of [githopping](githopping.md), just make tons of accounts, one on each git hosting site, add multiple push remotes and just keep pushing to all of them -- EZ. Remember, git hosting sites are just free file storage servers, not social platforms or brands to identify with. Do NOT use their non-git "features" such as issue trackers, CI and shit. They want you to use them as "facebook for programmers" and become dependent on their exclusive "features", so that's exactly what you want to avoid, just abuse their platform for free file storage. Additional tip on searching for git hosting sites: look up the currently popular git website software and search for its live instances with some nice search engine, e.g. currently searching just `gitea` on [wiby](wiby.md) returns a lot of free git hostings.
+**Which git hosting to use?** All of them (except for [GitHub](github.md) which is a proprietary terrorist site)! Do not fall into the trap of [githopping](githopping.md), just make tons of accounts, one on each git hosting site, add multiple push remotes and just keep pushing to all of them -- EZ. Remember, git hosting sites are just free file storage servers, not social platforms or brands to identify with. Do NOT use their non-git "features" such as issue trackers, CI and shit. They want you to use them as "facebook for programmers" and become dependent on their exclusive "features", so that's exactly what you want to avoid, just abuse their platform for free file storage. Additional tip on searching for git hosting sites: look up the currently popular git website software and search for its live instances with some nice search engine, e.g. currently searching just `gitea` (or "powered by gitea", "powered by gogs", "powered by forgejo") on [wiby](wiby.md) returns a lot of free git hostings.
 
 ## Alternatives
 

jesus.md

@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ As perhaps the most influential man in history whose image has been twisted, use
 - *"Thou shalt not kill."* being directly in ten commandments lol (maybe they don't understand because the language is archaic, one may always find an excuse)
 - ...
 
-(Americans are stupid idiots who say they love Jesus but rather love to reference Old Testament for their pragmatics life decisions, however the law of Old Testament was explicitly cancelled by Jesus and [updated](update_culture.md) to a new one, based on love and nonviolence rather than violence, punishment and revenge -- this is the whole point of why Jesus came to [Earth](earth.md) in the first place. But as it's been said, Americans are stupid.)
+(Americans are stupid idiots who say they love Jesus but rather love to reference Old Testament for their pragmatics life decisions, however the law of Old Testament was explicitly cancelled by Jesus and [updated](update_culture.md) to a new one, based on love and nonviolence rather than violence, punishment and revenge -- this is the whole point of why Jesus came to [Earth](earth.md) in the first place. It's why the book is called *New Testament*, which in many languages gets translated as "The New Law". But as it's been said, Americans are stupid.)
 
 **fun facts about Jesus**:
 
@@ -28,4 +28,26 @@ As perhaps the most influential man in history whose image has been twisted, use
 - **Jesus is supposed to return** and judge the people: this is known as the Second Coming and is hinted on in the Bible, though the details on the date or even the nature of the event are unclear and interpreted differently. Before the second coming **a number of antichrists, or false prophets, are to appear**.
 - ...
 
-TODO: moar
+## Life Of Jesus In Summary
+
+This is a quick summary of life and death of Jesus Christ, mostly according to the gospels (which however sometimes disagree) but also taking into account the views of historians, let us see this as our "best guess".
+
+Jesus was **born** around 6 to 4 BC in Bethlehem (in Israel) to Mary and Joseph, with Mary still being a virgin (which is a miracle claimed by Bible, denied by historians and even some churches); his father is said to be God, Mary was made pregnant by Holy Spirit. Jesus grew up in Nazareth and became a carpenter, as Joseph. Even as young he was very knowledgeable of the scripture.
+
+An important event was the **baptism** (the ritual of "purification by water") of Jesus in Jordan river by John the Baptist around 28 AD. This is seen as a real historical event nowadays. John the Baptist was a preacher who foretold the coming of Jesus and some of his followers then started to follow Jesus.
+
+After this Jesus went on to preaching, he chose **twelve apostles**, the closest followers to further preach his words to others; they were (there seems to be some differences between the gospels) Peter, Andrew, James, John, Philip, Bartholomew, Thomas, Matthew, James, Judas, Simon and Matthias. Jesus spoke in parables and made miracles like healing the blind, walking on water, feeding masses of people with only five loaves of bread and even resurrecting dead (Lazarus). His preaching was mainly about the [love](love.md) of [God](god.md), coming to God's kingdom after death, forgiveness (people should forgive others and their own sins will in turn be forgiven by God) and loving other people, even one's enemies, he advocated [nonviolence](nonviolence.md), modesty and frugality.
+
+As he arrived to Jerusalem, he was very famous and seen as a messiah by many, and as he broke many religious traditions, he began to upset the Jewish religious leaders, creating tension. He criticized practices of the leaders, e.g. commerce in temples. The Jews decided to arrest Jesus and lead him to Roman court.
+
+Another important moment is **the last supper**, the final meal of Jesus which he shared with his apostles. After this one of the apostles, Judas, betrayed Jesus (which Jesus foretold) in Mount of Olives by leading the temple police to Jesus; Judas did this for the reward of 30 silver coins, later his conscience made him commit suicide.
+
+The Jews have taken Jesus to Pontius Pilate, Roman governor, to be put on trial for the various offenses he committed. Pilate didn't find Jesus guilty but as the Jews pressured, he gave them a choice: he said he would either release Jesus or Barabbas, a murderer. The Jews chose Barabbas to be released, condemning Jesus to be crucified.
+
+The **crucifixion** of Jesus is also seen as a true historical event now, which took place most likely in 30 or 33 AD. Before death he was tortured, whipped and was put on a crown of thorns (to mock that he was supposed to be the "king of Jews"). He was led to a hill in Golgotha, just outside Jerusalem, to where he had to carry his own cross, onto which he was then nailed and left to die, alongside two other criminals. According to some gospels he said various things on the cross, for example "father, forgive them for they don't know what they do", "father, why have you forsaken me?" and finally "it is finished".
+
+His body was then buried in a tomb (which by historians is seen as unusual) of one of his followers. According to Bible, 3 days later he was **resurrected** (his tomb was found empty) and left the tomb, he went and visited some of his followers, and then, 40 days after the resurrection, ascended up to the heaven.
+
+## See Also
+
+- [Buddha](buddha.md)

marxism.md

@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
+# Marxism
+
+*Not to be confused with [communism](communism.md).*
+
+Marxism comprises ideas, theories and ideologies strongly based in works of [Karl Marx](marx.md) (and also Friedrich Engels), roughly aiming for a [revolution](revolution.md) that should end [capitalism](capitalism.dm), replace it with [socialist](socialism.md) society and eventually a truly [communist](communism.md) society. Though the terms Marxism and communism are NOT the same (communism is a general idea with many branches, e.g. [anarcho communism](ancom.md), Christian communism etc.), most common people see them as equivalent, which is unfortunate as communism is a purely [good](good.md) idea while Marxism is mostly a bad way of trying to achieve and sustain communism (the relationship between communism and Marxism may be roughly compared to the relationship between Christianity and Catholicism). Marxism comes with aggressive, revolutionary mindset that has caused great tragedies mainly during the 20th century, see mainly [USSR](ussr.md). Marxism sees itself as a [scientific](science.md) effort, it is studied by intellectuals and lives mainly in written works of Marxists.
+
+**We, [LRS](lrs.md), are communists but do NOT embrace Marxism!** Though we do agree with Marxists on many things (mostly identifying issues of [capitalism](capitalism.md) and the desire to replace it with some form of communism) and Marxism is still probably better than [capitalism](capitalism.md) (as anything is better than capitalism), we can't ever approve of some inherent traits of Marxism, mainly the following. Marxism is **violent**, aggressive and revolutionary, often highly hostile to [anarchism](anarchism.md) and [pacifism](pacifism.md) (which we highly embrace), wanting to FORCE communism. Marxists promote establishment of temporary **dictatorship** of the proletariat as they see it the only way to ending capitalism. **Marxists are NOT [altruists](altruism.md)**, their desire of communism doesn't come from love of life, they simply see it as a more efficient societal system than capitalism that's a natural and inevitable next step in evolution of society, they see a man as servant of society, they are obsessed with [work](work.md) and see people who don't share their values as undesirable -- these undesirable people are not only capitalists, but also people who don't want to work, religious people or people who refuse to [fight](fight_culture.md) for their society. They say that ends justify the means and will happily utilize means such as [war](war.md), dictatorship, executions, [censorship](censorship.md), cults of personality and propaganda. We cannot ever stand behind this.

needed.md

@@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ Here is a list of some projects and project ideas which we, [LRS](lrs.md), need
 | [GUI](gui.md) library                  | easy/mid   |                                 |              |                     |like SAF but for "PC" GUI (mouse, sound, ...), now GUI's a mess  |                           |
 | image/2D data library                  | mid?       |                                 |              |                     | C/comun lib for bitmaps (FFT, formats, ...), needs good planning|                           |
 | logic circuit library/simulator (comun)| mid/hard?  |                                 |              |                     | will be needed for PD computer                                  |                           |
+| Marble Blast clone (C?)                | mid/hard?  |                                 |              |                     | like Neverball but KISS, better controls, wouldn't be so hard   | Neverball                 |
 | "[micronation](micronation.md)"        | ???        |                                 |              |                     | kinda joke, has to be anarchist, no money/government/army       |                           |
 | [MUD](mud.md) codebase (C or comun)    | mid        |                                 |              |                     | AFAIK there is no nice MUD codebase now                         |                           |
 | nice polished concise encyclopedia     | mid/hard?  |                                 |              |                     | nice printable UNCENSORED encyclop. (clone of Larousse Desk E.) |                           |

political_correctness.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 *The issue is not my language but your ego.*
 
-Political correctness (abbreviated PC) means [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) [censorship](censorship.md) and propaganda forced into language, [science](science.md), [art](art.md) and generally all of culture, officially justified as "protecting people from getting offended". This does an immense [harm](harmful.md) to society as it is an artificially invented "issue" that not only puts people and science under heavy control, surveillance, censorship and threat of punishment, normalizing such practice, but also destroys culture, freedom of art and research and creates a great conflict between those who conform and those who value truth, freedom of art, science and communication, not talking about burdening the whole society with yet another [competitive](competition.md) [bullshit](bullshit.md) that doesn't have to exist at all. Political correctness is mainly a political tool that allows elimination (so called [cancelling](cancel_culture.md)) and discrediting opposition of [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) political movements and parties, as well as brainwashing and thought control (see e.g. [Newspeak](newspeak.md)).
+Political correctness (abbreviated PC) means [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) [censorship](censorship.md) and propaganda forced into language, [science](science.md), [art](art.md) and generally all of culture, officially justified as "protecting people from getting offended". This does an immense [harm](harmful.md) to society as it is an artificially invented "issue" that not only puts people and science under heavy control, surveillance, censorship and threat of punishment, normalizing such practice, but also destroys culture, freedom of art and research and creates a great conflict between those who conform and those who value truth, freedom of art, science and communication, not talking about burdening the whole society with yet another [competitive](competition.md) [bullshit](bullshit.md) that doesn't have to exist at all. Political correctness is mainly a political tool that allows elimination (so called [cancelling](cancel_culture.md)) and discrediting opposition of [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) political movements and parties, as well as brainwashing and thought control (see e.g. [Newspeak](newspeak.md)), and as such is criticized both by rightists and leftists (see e.g. [leftypol](leftypol.md)).
 
 ```
 
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ The whole idea is basically about declaring certain words, pictures, patterns of
 
 While political correctness loves to boast about "diversity" and somehow "protecting it", it is doing the exact opposite -- **political correctness kills diversity in society**, it aims for **a unified, sterile society** that's afraid of even hinting on someone else's difference out of fear of punishment. People are different, [stereotypes](stereotype.md) are based on reality, acknowledging this -- and even [joking](jokes.md) about it -- doesn't at all mean we have to start to hate each other (in fact that requires some fucked up mental gymnastics and a shitty society that pushes [competitive](capitalism.md) thinking), diversity is good, keeps us aware of strength in unity: everyone is good at something and bad at something, and sometimes we just do things differently, a westener might approach problem differently than Asian or Arab, they look different, think and behave differently, and that's a good thing; political correctness forbids such thinking and only states "there is no such thing as differences in people or culture, don't even dare to hint on it", it will go on to censor anything showing the differences do actually exist and leave nothing but plain white sheet of paper without anything on it, a robotic member of society that's afraid to ask someone about his gender or even place where he comes from, someone unable of thinking or communicating on his own, only resorting to preapproved "safe" ways of communication. Indeed, reality yet again starts beating dystopian fiction horrors.
 
-Political correctness goes strictly against [free speech](free_speech.md), it tries to force people "to behave" and be afraid of words and talking, it creates conflict, divides society and also TEACHES people to be offended by language -- i.e. even if a specific word wouldn't normally be used or seen in a hostile way (e.g. the *master branch* in git repositories), political correctness establishes that NOW IT IS OFFENSIVE and specific minorities SHOULD take offense, even if they normally wouldn't, supporting [offended culture](offended_culture.md) and [fight culture](fight_culture.md). I.e. political correctness can be called a [cancer](cancer.md) of society. **[LRS](lrs.md) must never adhere to political correctness!**
+Political correctness goes strictly against [free speech](free_speech.md), it tries to force people "to behave" and be afraid of words and talking, it creates conflict, divides society (for dividing the working class it is criticized e.g. by [Marxists](marxism.md)) and also TEACHES people to be [offended](offended_culture.md) by language -- i.e. even if a specific word wouldn't normally be used or seen in a hostile way (e.g. the *master branch* in git repositories), political correctness establishes that NOW IT IS OFFENSIVE and specific minorities SHOULD take offense, even if they normally wouldn't, supporting [offended culture](offended_culture.md) and [fight culture](fight_culture.md). I.e. political correctness can be called a [cancer](cancer.md) of society. **[LRS](lrs.md) must never adhere to political correctness!**
 
 Of course, political correctness doesn't stop at censoring simple words, don't get mistaken. Facts in textbooks and encyclopedias such as those regarding [race](race.md) and sex differences are censored and replaced with lies with the help of [soyence](soyence.md). Political correctness tries to forcefully dictate standards of a culture by an extremely rapidly changing fashion, e.g. the standard of beauty, politeness and so on -- last week we celebrated the international gender fluid day but THIS WEEK we celebrate fat disabled women with acne issues, all TV ads must have at least one crippled landwhale or else you're cancelled. If you can't keep up with their latest inventions you'll be executed -- on no, you used the term "mentally ill"! HOW DARE YOU THAT'S SO OFFENSIVELY AGGRESSIVE YOU HAVE TO SAY NEURODIVERGENT, you're basically [Hitler](hitler.md) now (but wait until next week when the word *neuro* itself becomes offensive).
 

prime.md

@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ The unique factorization can also nicely be used to encode [multisets](multiset.
 
 When in 1974 the Arecibo radio message was sent to space to carry a message for [aliens](alien.md), the resolution of the bitmap image it carried was chosen to be 73 x 23 pixels -- two primes. This was cleverly done so that when aliens receive the 1679 sequential values, there are only two possible ways to interpret them as a 2D bitmap image: 23 x 73 (incorrect) and 73 x 23 (correct). This increased the probability of correct interpretation against the case of sending an arbitrary resolution image.
 
-**There are infinitely many prime numbers**. The proof is pretty simple (shown below), however it's pretty interesting that it has still not been proven whether there are infinitely many **[twin primes](twin_prime.md) (primes that differ by 2)**, that seems to be an extremely difficult question.
+**There are infinitely many prime numbers**. The proof is pretty simple (shown below), however it's pretty interesting that it has still not been proven whether there are infinitely many **[twin primes](twin_prime.md) (primes that differ by 2)**, that seems to be an extremely difficult question. Another simple but unproven conjecture about prime numbers if [Goldbach's conjecture](goldbachs_conjecture.md) stating that every even number greater than 2 can be written as a sum of two primes.
 
 Euklid's [proof](proof.md) shows there are infinitely many primes, it is done by contradiction and goes as follows: suppose there are finitely many primes *p1*, *p2*, ... *pn*. Now let's consider a number *s* = *p1* * *p2* * ... * *pn* + 1. This means *s* - 1 is divisible by each prime *p1*, *p2*, ... *pn*, but *s* itself is not divisible by any of them (as it is just 1 greater than *s* and multiples of some number *q* greater than 1 have to be spaced by *q*, i.e. more than 1). If *s* isn't divisible by any of the considered primes, it itself has to be a prime. However that is in contradiction with the original assumption that *p1*, *p2*, ... *pn* are all existing primes. Therefore a finite list of primes cannot exist, there have to be infinitely many of them.
 

selflessness.md

@@ -14,4 +14,5 @@ Selfless programs and art should be put into the [public domain](public_domain.m
 
 ## See Also
 
+- [altruism](altruism.md)
 - [dog](dog.md)

usa.md

@@ -8,4 +8,6 @@ In US mainstream [politics](politics.md) there exists no true left, only [right]
 
 On 6th and 9th August 1945 **USA murdered about 200000 civilians**, most of whom were innocent men, women and children, by throwing atomic bombs on Japanese cities Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The men who threw the bombs and ordered the bombing were never put on trial, actually most Americans praise them as [heroes](hero_culture.md) and think it was a good thing to do.
 
-**Americans are uber retarded** for example in trying to somehow pursue both [self interest](self_interest.md) and "social equality", it's extremely ridiculous, an american brain is literally incapable of imagining someone who doesn't at his core work on the basis of self interest, so the American that tries to identify with "wanting equality and human rights" just comes up with hugely fucked up arguments like ["SKIN COLOR IS JUST ILLUSION THEREFORE WE ARE ALL EQUAL"](political_correctness.md) -- because he inevitably sees differences implying oppression because self interest just cannot be not present (this idea won't even occur for a second to him during his whole lifetime, it's simply something he NEVER can physically think), his mind is hard wired to be unable of grasping the idea of accepting difference between people while giving up the self interest of falling to [fascism](fascism.md) as a consequence. Similar arguments are encountered e.g. regarding [vegetarianism](vegetarianism.md): an American supporting vegetarianism will resort to denying evolution, biology and anatomy and will argue something like "HUMANS ARE HERBIVORES BECAUSE THIS FEMINIST SCIENTIST SAYS IT AND MEAT KILLS US SO WE MUST NOT EAT IT", again because he just thinks that admitting meat is healthy to us automatically implies we have to eat it because self interest is just something that's an inherent part of laws of physics; a normal (non retarded) vegetarian will of course admit not eating meat at all is probably a bit unhealthy, but it's a voluntary choice made of altruistic love towards other living beings who now don't have to die for one's tastier food.
+**Americans are uber retarded** for example in trying to somehow pursue both [self interest](self_interest.md) and "social equality", it's extremely ridiculous, an american brain is literally incapable of imagining someone who doesn't at his core work on the basis of self interest, so the American that tries to identify with "wanting equality and human rights" just comes up with hugely fucked up arguments like ["SKIN COLOR IS JUST ILLUSION THEREFORE WE ARE ALL EQUAL"](political_correctness.md) -- because he inevitably sees differences implying oppression because self interest just cannot be not present (this idea won't even occur for a second to him during his whole lifetime, it's simply something he NEVER can physically think), his mind is hard wired to be unable of grasping the idea of accepting difference between people while giving up the self interest of falling to [fascism](fascism.md) as a consequence. Similar arguments are encountered e.g. regarding [vegetarianism](vegetarianism.md): an American supporting vegetarianism will resort to denying evolution, biology and anatomy and will argue something like "HUMANS ARE HERBIVORES BECAUSE THIS FEMINIST SCIENTIST SAYS IT AND MEAT KILLS US SO WE MUST NOT EAT IT", again because he just thinks that admitting meat is healthy to us automatically implies we have to eat it because self interest is just something that's an inherent part of laws of physics; a normal (non retarded) vegetarian will of course admit not eating meat at all is probably a bit unhealthy, but it's a voluntary choice made of altruistic love towards other living beings who now don't have to die for one's tastier food.
+
+{ "List of atrocities by the United States" is the longest page on leftypedia :-) https://wiki.leftypol.org/wiki/List_of_atrocities_committed_by_the_United_States. ~drummyfish }

wiki_stats.md

@@ -2,8 +2,8 @@
 
 This is an auto-generated article holding stats about this wiki.
 
-- number of articles: 530
-- total size of all texts in bytes: 2648875
+- number of articles: 531
+- total size of all texts in bytes: 2650806
 
 longest articles:
 
@@ -23,6 +23,17 @@ longest articles:
 latest changes:
 
 ```
+Date:   Fri Dec 29 13:37:40 2023 +0100
+ascii_art.md
+cc.md
+dog.md
+free_software.md
+git.md
+how_to.md
+lrs.md
+suicide.md
+wiki_stats.md
+wikipedia.md
 Date:   Thu Dec 28 18:17:00 2023 +0100
 README.md
 bloat.md
@@ -45,16 +56,5 @@ c.md
 duskos.md
 fixed_point.md
 forth.md
-people.md
-quine.md
-sqrt.md
-wiki_stats.md
-Date:   Tue Dec 26 14:46:41 2023 +0100
-assembly.md
-cache.md
-cc0.md
-compression.md
-copyfree.md
-cos.md
 ```
 

wikipedia.md

@@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ There are many interesting and entertaining pages and articles on Wikipedia, som
 
 ## Alternatives
 
-Due to mass censorship and brainwashing going on at Wikipedia it is important to look for alternatives that are important especially when researching anything connected to politics, but also when you just want a simpler, more condensed explanation of some topic. There exist other online encyclopedias like [Metapedia](metapedia.md), [Citizendium](citizendium.md) or Britannica online, as well as printed enclopedias and old digitized encyclopedias like Britannica 11th edition. For a more comprehensive list of Wikipedia alternatives see the article on [encyclopedias](encyclopedia.md).
+Due to mass censorship and brainwashing going on at Wikipedia it is important to look for alternatives that are important especially when researching anything connected to politics, but also when you just want a simpler, more condensed explanation of some topic. There exist other online encyclopedias like [Metapedia](metapedia.md), [Infogalactic](infogalactic.md), [Citizendium](citizendium.md), [Leftypedia](leftypedia.md), [Justapedia](justapedia.md) or Britannica online, as well as printed encyclopedias and old digitized encyclopedias like Britannica 11th edition. For a more comprehensive list of Wikipedia alternatives see the article on [encyclopedias](encyclopedia.md). Anyway the moral of the story here is probably to not rely on a single encyclopedia, as we see where that leads. Read more sources and different points of view.
 
 { See also old Wikipedia at https://nostalgia.wikipedia.org/wiki/Race. ~drummyfish }