Update

charity_sex.md

@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
 # Charity Sex
 
-We define charity sex as [sex](sex.md) [selflessly](selflessness.md) provided for free just to make the other one happy -- this would mostly be done by a [women](woman.md) as women decide if sex happens or not, but in rare cases Charity sex can also be provided by an extremely handsome man. If a girl goes around providing a lot of charity sex to guys that are desperate for getting laid (such as [incels](incel.md)), she might be called a *charity whore* -- this is a greatly admirable activity, like someone going around buying food for the homeless. If you are girl please do this.
+We define charity sex as [sex](sex.md) [selflessly](selflessness.md) provided for free just to make the other one happy -- this would mostly be done by a [women](woman.md) as women decide if sex happens or not, but in rare cases Charity sex can also be provided by an extremely handsome man. If a girl goes around providing a lot of charity sex to guys that are desperate for getting laid (such as [incels](incel.md)), she might be called a *charity whore* -- this is a greatly admirable activity, like someone going around buying food for the homeless. If you are girl please do this.
+
+UPDATE: an actual girl (let's rather keep it safe and [not mention](censorship.md) her name) has peer-reviewed this article and commented this much:
+
+*"I like this idea because if the charitable woman is only copulating with incels, there's no risk of STDs."*

dramatica.md

@@ -25,4 +25,7 @@ We applaud Encyclopedia Dramatica and yes, this article sucks its dick a little,
 - [4chan](4chan.md)
 - [LRS wiki](lrs_wiki.md)
 - [loquendo](loquendo.md)
-- [lurkmore](lurkmore.md)
+- [South Park](south_park.md)
+- [Ashley Jones](ashley_jones.md)
+- [lurkmore](lurkmore.md)
+- [soyjak wiki](soyjak_wiki.md)

faq.md

@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
 
 *Not to be confused with [fuck](fuck.md) or [frequently questioned answers](fqa.md).*
 
+Now degenerated into kind of AMA.
+
 { answers by ~[drummyfish](drummyfish.md) }
 
 ### Is this a joke? Are you [trolling](trolling.md)?

future.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Future is the [time](time.md) that follows after present. TODO
 
 In [21st century](21st_century.md) it is extremely easy to predict the future, you just ask "what is the worst thing that could happen?" and that is what will happen. Will [capitalism](capitalism.md) get stronger? Yes. Will all your favorite movies, song and games be killed? Yes, it already mostly happened. Will [Internet](internet.md) be more [censored](censorship.md)? Yes, it's getting more so every day. More [bloat](bloat.md)? Sure. Will [women](woman.md) kill all men? Yes. Will [free software](free_software.md) be made illegal? Of course. Will there be more gays and furries? Yes. Nuclear war? Indeed yes. Will [AI](ai.md) take work of humans? Hell no, [that would be awesome](ubi.md), but humans will continue to be slaves forever, even if it was just for the sake of keeping them slaves. Etc.
 
-This is true a prediction of the future: a higher level organism will be formed from current life and/or life-like forms (humans, AI, computers, ...), just like our bodies were formed from initial single cellular organisms. This is a constant pattern in nature: lower scale organisms organize and form higher scale organisms to which they are basic building units and absolute slaves. Cities, countries, [Internet](internet.md) and [corporations](corporation.md) are first attempts at such higher entities, all competing and engaging in [evolution](evolution.md), however this is an early stage of the competition, one at which these entities are still quite unstable because the cells haven't yet been completely controlled, the higher organisms emerge and die relatively quickly; later on a single higher entity will emerge, like human prevailed among animals. The cells of such organisms may be humans but also humans combined with machines or pure machines that will yet manage to overpower humans -- at this point it looks like all life will be eliminated by capitalism quite soon as machines are just more efficient for the economy. It would probably be better if humans went extinct because from our point of view the higher organism will be a [dystopia](dystopia.md), something a [capitalist](capitalism.md)/rightist would call an orderly state, it will be a techno hell with absolute surveillance and control over all the cells, every cell will be supposed to do exactly its work and benefit solely the higher organism, even by sacrificing own life, just as for example blood cells are supposed to sacrifice themselves to close a wound of a human. Any disobedient cell will be spotted and eliminated immediately, just like any potentially cancerous cell is killed by our immune system -- the set up for this is already in progress, we see it by increasing capitalism, surveillance, censorship, [though control](newspeak.md) and so on. Keep in mind this is absolutely true prediction of the future, there is no reason why development of organisms should stop at our scale, that would be a very human centric view of the world and a probably a greater miracle than surpassing the speed of light. There can be done nothing about it, just deal with it, promote [LRS](lrs.md) until you lose and die.
+This is true a prediction of the future: a higher level organism [will be formed](capitalist_singularity.md) from current life and/or life-like forms (humans, AI, computers, ...), just like our bodies were formed from initial single cellular organisms. This is a constant pattern in nature: lower scale organisms organize and form higher scale organisms to which they are basic building units and absolute slaves. Cities, countries, [Internet](internet.md) and [corporations](corporation.md) are first attempts at such higher entities, all competing and engaging in [evolution](evolution.md), however this is an early stage of the competition, one at which these entities are still quite unstable because the cells haven't yet been completely controlled, the higher organisms emerge and die relatively quickly; later on a single higher entity will emerge, like human prevailed among animals. The cells of such organisms may be humans but also humans combined with machines or pure machines that will yet manage to overpower humans -- at this point it looks like all life will be eliminated by capitalism quite soon as machines are just more efficient for the economy. It would probably be better if humans went extinct because from our point of view the higher organism will be a [dystopia](dystopia.md), something a [capitalist](capitalism.md)/rightist would call an orderly state, it will be a techno hell with absolute surveillance and control over all the cells, every cell will be supposed to do exactly its work and benefit solely the higher organism, even by sacrificing own life, just as for example blood cells are supposed to sacrifice themselves to close a wound of a human. Any disobedient cell will be spotted and eliminated immediately, just like any potentially cancerous cell is killed by our immune system -- the set up for this is already in progress, we see it by increasing capitalism, surveillance, censorship, [though control](newspeak.md) and so on. Keep in mind this is absolutely true prediction of the future, there is no reason why development of organisms should stop at our scale, that would be a very human centric view of the world and a probably a greater miracle than surpassing the speed of light. There can be done nothing about it, just deal with it, promote [LRS](lrs.md) until you lose and die.
 
 Here is how to make a correct prediction of the future: separately predict each possible outcome, one of them will turn out to be correct.
 

google.md

@@ -6,9 +6,9 @@ Google's motto used to be **"Don't be evil"**, but in 2018 they ditched it lol x
 
 Google raised to the top thanks to its [search engine](search_engine.md) launched in the 90s. It soon got a **monopoly on the Internet search** and started pushing ads. Nowadays Google's search engine basically just promotes "content" on Google's own content platforms such as [YouTube](youtube.md) and of course censors sites deemed politically incorrect.
 
-**If you are relying on Goolag for your search, you are missing on a huge part of the web**, you will simply never see links to huge parts of the web which currently include e.g. [Kiwifarms](kiwifarms.md), [Metapedia](metapedia.md), [Encyclopedia Dramatica](dramatica.md), [Infogalactic](infogalactic.md), [Incels wiki](incels_wiki.md), [8kun](8kun.md) and many others. You are literally using crippled "search engine" if it can even be called so anymore, you're seeing a tiny bubble of preapproved content.
+**If you are relying on Goolag for your search, you are missing on a huge part of the web**, you will simply never see links to huge parts of the web which currently include e.g. [Kiwifarms](kiwifarms.md), [Metapedia](metapedia.md), [Encyclopedia Dramatica](dramatica.md), [Infogalactic](infogalactic.md), [Incels wiki](incels_wiki.md), [8kun](8kun.md) and many others, including thousands and thousands of [small noncommercial sites](smol_internet.md). You are literally using crippled "search engine" if it can even be called so anymore, you're seeing a tiny bubble of preapproved content.
 
-Besides heavily biasing web search results towards Google's own and friendly platforms, Google also **heavily censors** the search results and won't show links to prohibited sites unless you literally very specifically show that you want to find a prohibited site you already know of, for example you won't find results leading to [Metapedia](metapedia.md) or Encyclopedia Dramatica unless you literally search for the url of those sites of long verbatim phrases they contain -- this is a trick played on those who "test" Google which at is mean to make it look as if Google actually isn't censored, however it is of course censored because the only people who will ever find the prohibited sites and their content are people who already know about it and are specifically searching for it just to test Google's censorship. { EDIT: tho Google also seems to refuse to give some URLs no matter what, e.g. https://infogalactic.com. Just tested it. ~drummyfish } If you intend to truly search the Internet, don't rely on Google's results but search with multiple engines (that have their own index) such as Mojeek, Yandex, Right Dao, [wiby](wiby.md), [YaCy](yacy.md), Qwant etc. (and of course search the [darknet](darknet.md)), also check out [metasearch engines](metasearch_engine.md) like [SearxNG](searxng.md).
+Besides heavily biasing web search results towards Google's own and friendly platforms, Google also **heavily censors** the search results and won't show links to prohibited sites unless you literally very specifically show that you want to find a prohibited site you already know of, for example you won't find results leading to [Metapedia](metapedia.md) or Encyclopedia Dramatica unless you literally search for the url of those sites or long verbatim phrases they contain -- this is a trick played on those who "test" Google which at is mean to make it look as if Google actually isn't censored, however it is of course censored because the only people who will ever find the prohibited sites and their content are people who already know about it and are specifically searching for it just to test Google's censorship. { EDIT: tho Google also seems to refuse to give some URLs no matter what, e.g. https://infogalactic.com. Just tested it. ~drummyfish } If you intend to truly search the Internet, don't rely on Google's results but search with multiple engines (that have their own index) such as Mojeek, Yandex, Right Dao, [wiby](wiby.md), [YaCy](yacy.md), Qwant etc. (and of course search the [darknet](darknet.md)), also check out [metasearch engines](metasearch_engine.md) like [SearxNG](searxng.md).
 
 Google has created a malicious [capitalist](capitalist_software.md) mobile "[operating system](operating_system.md)" called [Android](android.md), which they based on [Linux](linux.md) with which they managed to bypass its [copyleft](copyleft.md) by making Android de-facto dependent on their proprietary *Play Store* and other programs. I.e. they managed to take a [free](free_software.md) project and make a de-facto [proprietary](proprietary.md) [malware](malware.md) out of it -- a system that typically doesn't allow users to modify its internals and turn off its malicious features. Android is also one of the ugliest pieces of software ever made, requiring hugely specific and expensive computer setup just for its compilation. With Android they invaded a huge number of devices from cells phones to TVs and have the ability to spy on the users of these devices.
 

how_to.md

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ An important issue of many ideologies/philosophies/religions/etc. has shown to b
 Examples from LRS point of view:
 
 - Is it OK to ever use violence? Here LRS takes the extremist way of strongly saying no -- according to us violence is always bad and we define this as an [axiom](axiom.md), something without a need of proof, it is the very foundation of our movement and not acknowledging it would simply mean it's not LRS anymore. However a bit of moderacy may also appear here; if for example someone uses violence in a desperate attempt to protect one's child, though we won't embrace the action we won't condemn the man either -- he committed a "sin", did something wrong, but in his situation there was really no right thing to do, so what should we blame him for, for being a subject of unfortunate situation?
-- Is it OK to sometimes use proprietary software? Here for example [Richard Stallman](rms.md)/FSF/[GNU](gnu.md) take the extremist stance and say no, proprietary software is the literal [devil](devil.md) and though shalt evade it for all cost (in fact GNU will put effort in purposefully breaking compatibility with proprietary software, which is borderline capitalist behavior similar to artificial obsolescence etc.). While we agree it is a good general rule to avoid software whose purpose is almost exclusively the abuse of its user, we may be more tolerant and allow breaking the rule sometimes, because to us proprietary software is nothing set in any axiom, it is just a symptom resulting from bad society. As a non-axiom it should be a subject to constant reevaluation against the main goal. A simple commandment of "NO TOUCH NOTHING PROPRIETARY" is a good tool for a newcomer, it is a simple to follow rule of thumb that teaches him to find free replacements and alternatives, however once one becomes advanced and eventually a master of the freedom philosophy, he sees things aren't as simple to be solved by one simple rule, just as a master of music knows when to break basic rules of thumb, when to leave the scale, break the rhythm to make excellent music. Here we see it similarly: When touching proprietary software doesn't result in significant harm (such as supporting its developer, becoming addicted to it, getting abused by it, ...) and when it does significant good (e.g. inspires creation of its free clone, reveals the mechanisms by which it abuses its users, ...), it may in fact be good to do so.
+- Is it OK to sometimes use proprietary software? Here for example [Richard Stallman](rms.md)/FSF/[GNU](gnu.md) take the extremist stance and say no, proprietary software is the literal [devil](devil.md) and thou shalt evade it for all cost (in fact GNU will put effort in purposefully breaking compatibility with proprietary software, which is borderline capitalist behavior similar to artificial obsolescence etc.). While we agree it is a good general rule to avoid software whose purpose is almost exclusively the abuse of its user, we may be more tolerant and allow breaking the rule sometimes, because to us proprietary software is nothing set in any axiom, it is just a symptom resulting from bad society. As a non-axiom it should be a subject to constant reevaluation against the main goal. A simple commandment of "NO TOUCH NOTHING PROPRIETARY" is a good tool for a newcomer, it is a simple to follow rule of thumb that teaches him to find free replacements and alternatives, however once one becomes advanced and eventually a master of the freedom philosophy, he sees things aren't as simple to be solved by one simple rule, just as a master of music knows when to break basic rules of thumb, when to leave the scale, break the rhythm to make excellent music. Here we see it similarly: When touching proprietary software doesn't result in significant harm (such as supporting its developer, becoming addicted to it, getting abused by it, ...) and when it does significant good (e.g. inspires creation of its free clone, reveals the mechanisms by which it abuses its users, ...), it may in fact be good to do so.
 - Should you oppose your boss at work, deny to serve him in unethical practice because he is a filthy capitalist and so make trouble for yourself, possibly even get fired for it? Well, this is not so easy again; a strict extremist anticapitalist here would just stay without a job because he couldn't work as any work supports capitalism. On the other hand such a guy would just be homeless, rid of any practical opportunity to create and do good, and would probably die soon anyway. Here it's more or less a question of personal tuning, finding the "least harmful" job, minimizing time spent at it so as to be able to do good in spare time, opposing your boss sometimes but not every single time, not really building a career so that you may quit at any moment etc. Until we have [basic income](ubi.md) or something, you are more or less [doomed](doom.md) to suffer dealing with this on your own sadly.
 
 ## Tech
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ Also please take a look at [gopher](gopher.md) (a much better alternative to web
 
 Here we will quickly sum up how to make a **[static](static.md), single page plain [HTML](html.md) website without TLS (https)**, which should suffice for most things (sharing opinions, contacts, files, multimedia, simple blogging, ...). Once you get more advanced you can do fancy stuff like this wiki (multi-page wiki written in [Markdown](markdown.md), compiled to HTML with a shell script etc.).
 
-**NOTE on TLS (https)**: most sites on the web nowadays use encryption for MUH SECURITY obsession and also web browsers kinda prefer such sites etc. (in the future it will probably be required but by then we'll already be elsewhere) -- such site addresses are prefixed with `https://`, as opposed to normal non-encrypted `http://`. [Encryption](encryption.md) is huge [bloat](bloat.md) and mess to set up, normally you need to pay extra money to get a [certificate](certificate.md) for it (though services like Let's Encrypt provide certificates for free) etc. -- basically you only need encryption if you have an interactive site where passwords or other sensitive info gets sent, a purely static site basically doesn't need encryption at all, however if your site doesn't support encryption it may get some penalty by search engines and browsers as they won't "trust it as much", it's just a form of internet bullying for not conforming to latest encryption hysteria. All in all if you can set up encryption easily (e.g. with a single button on your web hosting provider site), do it just for the sake of normies; if you are experienced and can set it up yourself easily, also do it, but if not, just don't care about it and run your site on `http://` only, at least for now until you get into this stuff. Also very importantly **always support plain unencrypted http** even if you set up https, otherwise you're bullying simple browsers that don't implement encryption.
+**NOTE on TLS (https)**: most sites on the web nowadays use encryption for MUH SECURITY obsession and also web browsers and search engines kinda prefer such sites etc. (in the future it will probably be required but by then we'll already be elsewhere) -- such site addresses are prefixed with `https://`, as opposed to normal non-encrypted `http://`. [Encryption](encryption.md) is huge [bloat](bloat.md) and mess to set up, normally you need to pay extra money to get a [certificate](certificate.md) for it (though services like Let's Encrypt provide certificates for free) etc. -- basically you only need encryption if you have an interactive site where passwords or other sensitive info gets sent, a purely static site basically doesn't need encryption at all, however if your site doesn't support encryption it may get some penalty by search engines and browsers as they won't "trust it as much", it's just a form of internet bullying for not conforming to latest encryption hysteria. All in all if you can set up encryption easily (e.g. with a single button on your web hosting provider site), do it just for the sake of normies; if you are experienced and can set it up yourself easily, also do it, but if not, just don't care about it and run your site on `http://` only, at least for now until you get into this stuff. Also very importantly **always support plain unencrypted http** even if you set up https, otherwise you're bullying simple browsers that don't implement encryption.
 
 Now **do NOT follow mainstream tutorials on making website** (Wordpress, PHP, static generators, ...) -- these are absolute horseshit and just follow ugly capitalist ways, you will just get brain cancer. Also do NOT use any frameworks; **do NOT even use static site generators** -- these are not needed at all! All you really need for making a small website is:
 

less_retarded_society.md

@@ -136,6 +136,7 @@ Here are some of the ideas/movements/ideologies and people whose ideas inspired
 ## See Also
 
 - [LRS](lrs.md)
+- [island](island.md)
 - [*Non-Competitive Society* by drummyfish](https://codeberg.org/drummyfish/my_text_data/src/branch/master/writings/non-competitive%20society.md)
 - [how to](how_to.md)
 - [Venus Project](venus_project.md)

linux.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 { At this point it's best to start using a different kernel if you can. Consider BSD or Hurd maybe. ~drummyfish }
 
-Linux (also Lunix or Loonix, [egoistically](egoism.md) named after its original creator [Linus Torvalds](linus_torvalds.md)) is a partially "[open-source](open_source.md)" [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) [unix-like](unix_like.md) [operating system](operating_system.md) [kernel](kernel.md), probably the most successful "mostly [FOSS](foss.md)" kernel, nowadays already hijacked and milked by [capitalism](capitalism.md) and not worth using anymore. One of its greatest advantages was support of a lot of [hardware](hardware.md) (though probably owing greatly to the sneaky embedding of proprietary blobs in it); it ran besides others on [x86](x86.md], [PowerPC](ppc.md), [Arm](arm.md), had many [drivers](driver.md) and could be compiled to be quite small so as to run well even on very weak computers. **Linux is NOT an operating system**, only its basic part -- for a whole operating system more things need to be added, such as some kind of [user interface](ui.md) and actual user programs (so called [userland](userland.md)), and this is what [Linux distributions](linux_distro.md) do (there hundreds of these) -- Linux distributions, such as [Debian](debian.md), [Arch](arch.md) or [Ubuntu](ubuntu.md) are complete operating systems (but beware, most of them are not fully [FOSS](foss.md)). The mascot of the project is a penguin named [Tux](tux.md) (under some vague non-standard [license](license.md)). Linux is one of the biggest collaborative programming projects, as of now it has more than 15000 contributors. Despite popular misconceptions **Linux is [proprietary](proprietary.md) software** by containing [binary blobs](binary_blob.md) (pieces of proprietary code sneakily inserted into obscure parts of the source code) -- completely free distributions have to use [forks](fork.md) that remove these (see e.g. [Linux-libre](linux_libre.md), [Debian](debian.md)'s Linux fork etc.). Linux is also **greatly [bloated](bloat.md)** (though not anywhere near [Windows](windows.md) and such) and **[tranny software](tranny_software.md)**, abusing technology as a vehicle for promoting [liberal politics](sjw.md). While back in the day Linux was one of the coolest projects, by 2024 **Linux is absolute shit** and basically dead, it has [code of censorship](coc.md), it's been absolutely hijacked by capitalism, developed by the worst corporations and fascist political groups ([feminists](feminism.md), [LGBT](lgbt.md), ...), it is greatly overcomplicated for the sake of keeping a [bloat monopoly](bloat_monopoly.md), commercialized, full of [Rust](rust.md) code; there are already even backdoor popping in (see the 2024 XZ scandal), basically it's almost unusable now. The spirit, significance, journey and eventual fate of Linux are similar to e.g. [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) -- initially a project of freedom later on couldn't resist the immense capitalist pressure and eventually started selling its popularity to evil entities, becoming the opposite of its past self.
+Linux (also Lunix or Loonix, [egoistically](egoism.md) named after its original creator [Linus Torvalds](linus_torvalds.md)) is a partially "[open-source](open_source.md)" [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) [unix-like](unix_like.md) [operating system](operating_system.md) [kernel](kernel.md), probably the most successful "mostly [FOSS](foss.md)" kernel, nowadays already hijacked and milked by [capitalism](capitalism.md) and not worth using anymore. One of its greatest advantages was support of a lot of [hardware](hardware.md) (though probably owing greatly to the sneaky embedding of proprietary blobs in it); it ran besides others on [x86](x86.md), [PowerPC](ppc.md), [Arm](arm.md), had many [drivers](driver.md) and could be compiled to be quite small so as to run well even on very weak computers. **Linux is NOT an operating system**, only its basic part -- for a whole operating system more things need to be added, such as some kind of [user interface](ui.md) and actual user programs (so called [userland](userland.md)), and this is what [Linux distributions](linux_distro.md) do (there hundreds of these) -- Linux distributions, such as [Debian](debian.md), [Arch](arch.md) or [Ubuntu](ubuntu.md) are complete operating systems (but beware, most of them are not fully [FOSS](foss.md)). The mascot of the project is a penguin named [Tux](tux.md) (under some vague non-standard [license](license.md)). Linux is one of the biggest collaborative programming projects, as of now it has more than 15000 contributors. Despite popular misconceptions **Linux is [proprietary](proprietary.md) software** by containing [binary blobs](binary_blob.md) (pieces of proprietary code sneakily inserted into obscure parts of the source code) -- completely free distributions have to use [forks](fork.md) that remove these (see e.g. [Linux-libre](linux_libre.md), [Debian](debian.md)'s Linux fork etc.). Linux is also **greatly [bloated](bloat.md)** (though not anywhere near [Windows](windows.md) and such) and **[tranny software](tranny_software.md)**, abusing technology as a vehicle for promoting [liberal politics](sjw.md). While back in the day Linux was one of the coolest projects, by 2024 **Linux is absolute shit** and basically dead, it has [code of censorship](coc.md), it's been absolutely hijacked by capitalism, developed by the worst corporations and fascist political groups ([feminists](feminism.md), [LGBT](lgbt.md), ...), it is greatly overcomplicated for the sake of keeping a [bloat monopoly](bloat_monopoly.md), commercialized, full of [Rust](rust.md) code; there are already even backdoor popping in (see the 2024 XZ scandal), basically it's almost unusable now. The spirit, significance, journey and eventual fate of Linux are similar to e.g. [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) -- initially a project of freedom later on couldn't resist the immense capitalist pressure and eventually started selling its popularity to evil entities, becoming the opposite of its past self.
 
 [Fun](fun.md) note: there is a site that counts certain words in the Linux source code, https://www.vidarholen.net/contents/wordcount. For the lulz in 2019 some word counts were: "fuck": 16, "shit": 33, "idiot": 17, "retard": 4, "hack": 1571, "todo": 6166, "fixme": 4256.
 

nigger.md

@@ -57,4 +57,5 @@ In the [gender studies](gender_studies.md) circles there is an academic debate a
 - [kurwa](kurwa.md)
 - [subnormal](subnormal.md)
 - [chink](chink.md)
-- [no-no](nono.md)
+- [no-no](nono.md)
+- the [C-word](capitalism.md)

pedophilia.md

@@ -46,4 +46,5 @@ Defending pedophilia in itself is enough to be cancelled, perhaps even imprisone
 - [necrophilia](necrophilia.md)
 - [zoophilia](zoophilia.md)
 - [pedobear](pedobear.md)
+- [pedosexual](pedosexual.md)
 - [clovergender](clovergender.md) (child stuck in adult body, attracted to other children)

wiki_stats.md

@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
 This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
 
 - number of articles: 587
-- number of commits: 850
+- number of commits: 851
-- total size of all texts in bytes: 4110387
+- total size of all texts in bytes: 4113410
-- total number of lines of article texts: 30916
+- total number of lines of article texts: 30931
 - number of script lines: 262
 - occurences of the word "person": 7
 - occurences of the word "nigger": 90
@@ -25,24 +25,24 @@ longest articles:
 - [3d_model](3d_model.md): 40K
 - [bloat](bloat.md): 36K
 - [internet](internet.md): 36K
+- [woman](woman.md): 36K
 - [history](history.md): 32K
 - [game](game.md): 32K
 - [random_page](random_page.md): 32K
 - [main](main.md): 32K
 - [3d_rendering](3d_rendering.md): 32K
-- [woman](woman.md): 32K
 - [pseudorandomness](pseudorandomness.md): 32K
 
 top 50 5+ letter words:
 
 - which (2334)
-- there (1784)
+- there (1785)
 - people (1583)
-- example (1359)
+- example (1360)
 - other (1286)
 - number (1143)
-- software (1140)
+- software (1141)
-- about (1104)
+- about (1106)
 - program (922)
 - their (869)
 - because (862)
@@ -50,36 +50,36 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
 - called (796)
 - being (796)
 - things (777)
-- something (771)
+- something (772)
 - language (768)
 - numbers (749)
 - computer (748)
 - simple (737)
-- without (697)
+- without (698)
 - programming (683)
 - function (674)
 - these (660)
-- different (650)
+- different (651)
 - however (644)
 - system (611)
 - world (600)
 - should (594)
-- doesn (583)
+- doesn (585)
 - games (576)
 - point (569)
-- society (567)
+- society (568)
 - while (555)
-- drummyfish (539)
+- drummyfish (542)
 - though (537)
-- still (527)
+- still (528)
-- using (524)
+- using (525)
 - possible (522)
-- simply (519)
+- simply (520)
 - memory (508)
 - similar (507)
 - course (502)
-- technology (496)
+- https (498)
-- https (495)
+- technology (497)
 - always (474)
 - really (468)
 - basically (457)
@@ -89,6 +89,15 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
 latest changes:
 
 ```
+Date:   Mon Jul 22 21:26:59 2024 +0200
+  anal_bead.md
+  drummyfish.md
+  main.md
+  people.md
+  random_page.md
+  wiki_pages.md
+  wiki_stats.md
+  woman.md
 Date:   Mon Jul 22 14:02:59 2024 +0200
   wiki_stats.md
 Date:   Mon Jul 22 14:02:40 2024 +0200
@@ -99,17 +108,6 @@ Date:   Mon Jul 22 13:53:39 2024 +0200
   wiki_stats.md
 Date:   Mon Jul 22 13:53:19 2024 +0200
   wiki_stats.md
-Date:   Mon Jul 22 13:52:54 2024 +0200
-  21st_century.md
-  acronym.md
-  dramatica.md
-  exercises.md
-  fractal.md
-  lgbt.md
-  music.md
-  pedophilia.md
-  random_page.md
-  usa.md
 ```
 
 most wanted pages:
@@ -141,7 +139,7 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
 - [capitalism](capitalism.md) (232) 
 - [c](c.md) (216) 
 - [bloat](bloat.md) (208) 
-- [free_software](free_software.md) (175) 
+- [free_software](free_software.md) (176) 
 - [game](game.md) (141) 
 - [suckless](suckless.md) (138) 
 - [proprietary](proprietary.md) (121) 
@@ -165,8 +163,8 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
 - [foss](foss.md) (75) 
 - [art](art.md) (74) 
 - [programming_language](programming_language.md) (72) 
+- [woman](woman.md) (69) 
 - [internet](internet.md) (69) 
-- [corporation](corporation.md) (69) 
 - ...
 - [zuckerberg](zuckerberg.md) (4) 
 - [wiki_pages](wiki_pages.md) (4) 

woman.md

@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ Here is a list of almost all historically notable women (this is NOT cherrypicke
 
 { People ask me why I'm bashing women so much here :D Basically for [fun](fun.md), but the main reason is probably [feminism](feminism.md) -- the more they try to make women godlike, the more fun I make of them. So blame feminists basically. ~drummyfish }
 
-## Drummyfish's Apology To Based Women
+## Drummyfish's Official Apologies To Based Women
 
 *The following is written by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md), the author of this article.*
 
@@ -128,9 +128,11 @@ Previously in the article I have stated the following:
 
 { Please, PLEASE show me a truly based woman and I'll unironically mention her here with an apology. I want to see her, I want them to exist, I'm hoping this article may even "motivate" some girls to become based and prove me wrong, at least by being a very rare exception. But remember, she has to be really, really based, so based that what she does would be LRS-kind of based even if she was a man, okay? Basically it would have to be something like an antifeminist, anti LGBT but pacifist anarchist girl who does charity sex for fun (while not being a complete landwhale), makes selfless public domain porn and programs minimalist CC0 software in C or something, and also mustn't wear any makeup or have any tattoos. If it's not close to this ideal, don't even mention her. ~drummyfish }
 
-This section will be dedicated to me fulfilling my promise. Please note that me acknowledging a based woman doesn't automatically come with me approving of everything she does, I just think she is very, VERY cool in many ways and I admit she impressed me to a very high level.
+This section will be dedicated to me fulfilling my promise. Please note that me acknowledging a based woman doesn't automatically come with me approving of everything she does, I just think she is very, VERY cool in many ways and I admit she impressed me to a very high level. Also keep in mind a based woman may later on turn into unbased woman, just like [Luke Smith](luke_smith.md) did for instance.
 
-I have found the website of [Ashley Jones](ashley_jones.md): https://icum.to/. She immediately caught my attention, I think she is truly based, for example for the following reasons (note that this is purely my interpretation of what I've seen/read on her website): She is a pretty, biological woman (i.e. NOT some kind of angry trans landwhale) BUT she shits on feminism and acknowledges plain facts about women such as that they usually need to be "put in line" (with love) by a man and that they are simply different. She makes a nice, ACTUALLY ENTERTAINING, well made politically incorrect stuff, her art is sincere, not trying to pretend anything or ride on some kind of fashion wave. She makes fun of herself (like that she has a crush on [Duke Nukem](duke_3d.md) lol) and does some cool stuff like post measurements of her asshole. It looks like she possesses some skills with technology (at least [Luke Smith](luke_smith.md) level), she supports [free software](free_software.md). She acknowledges the insanity of [pedophile](pedophilia.md) hysteria and proposes lowering age of consent. Her website is quite nice, 1.0 style, with high LRS/4chan/Dramatica vibes, there are "offensive" jokes but she stresses she in fact doesn't encourage violence and that she's not an extremist. She even seems to have her own imageboard?!?! She seems to see through propaganda and brainwashing, she says she does "not accept the reality" forced on her by this society, something we say and do as well, she shits on vaccines and likes cool "conspiracy theories". Yes, she seems SMART, she sees the power game of the elites, the propaganda, warns about it, shits on it. She seems to know how to write [English](english.md) without making 10 errors in every word. She advocates ETHICAL veganism, to spare animals of suffering. She hates [Elon Musk](elon_musk.md). She advocates not using a cellphone. (I haven't noticed any tattoos on her either, but she'll stay even if it turned out she has one, she's still cool.) **Ashley Jones, I apologize to you, please stay awesome and inspire more women to be as based as you are <3 --drummyfish**. No, the words don't come out of my penis, they come out of my heart. Please stay cool.
+I have found the website of **[Ashley Jones](ashley_jones.md)**: https://icum.to. She immediately caught my attention, I reckon she is truly based, for example for the following reasons (note that this is purely my interpretation of what I've seen/read on her website): She is a pretty, biological woman (i.e. NOT some kind of angry trans landwhale) BUT she shits on feminism and acknowledges plain facts about women such as that they usually need to be "put in line" (with love) by a man and that they are simply different. She makes a nice, ACTUALLY ENTERTAINING, well made politically incorrect stuff, her art is sincere, not trying to pretend anything or ride on some kind of fashion wave. She makes fun of herself (like that she has a crush on [Duke Nukem](duke3d.md) lol) and does some cool stuff like post measurements of her asshole. It looks like she possesses some skills with technology (at least [Luke Smith](luke_smith.md) level), she supports [free software](free_software.md). She acknowledges the insanity of [pedophile](pedophilia.md) hysteria and proposes lowering age of consent. She wants to normalize nudity. Her website is quite nice, 1.0 style, with high LRS/4chan/Dramatica vibes, there are "offensive" jokes but she stresses she in fact doesn't encourage violence and that she's not an extremist -- in one video she says she dislikes transsexuals and wants to make fun of gays but that in fact she doesn't mind any individual being gay or whatever, basically just opposing the political movements, propaganda, brainwashing etcetc., i.e. showing the exact same kind of attitude as us. She even seems to have her own imageboard?!?! She seems to see through propaganda and brainwashing, she says she does "not accept the reality" forced on her by this society, something we say and do as well, she shits on vaccines and likes cool "conspiracy theories". Yes, she seems SMART, she sees the power game of the elites, the propaganda, warns about it, shits on it. She seems to know how to write [English](english.md) without making 10 errors in every word. She advocates ETHICAL veganism, to spare animals of suffering. She hates [Elon Musk](elon_musk.md). She advocates not using cellphones and mainstream social networks. (I haven't noticed any tattoos on her either, but she'll stay even if it turned out she has one, she's still cool.) **Ashley Jones, I apologize to you, please stay awesome and inspire more women to be as based as you are <3 --drummyfish**. No, the words don't come out of my penis, they come out of my heart. Please stay cool.
+
+*Your name here? Let me if you come by another candidate for a based woman :)*
 
 ## See Also