drummyfish/less_retarded_wiki
5
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Update

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Miloslav Ciz 2025-06-26 00:54:22 +02:00
parent 669ad27adb
commit dbf191fd3a
25 changed files with 1985 additions and 1957 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
soyence.md
View file

@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ we cannot miss the fact that this way of establishing truth has simply no longer
- "We can totally trust the results of commercial research. They will be objective and sincerely publish even results that will ruin their business because even CEOs are moral people and wouldn't dare lie even if that should cost them their career. Even if a corporation wanted to do something bad there are still the excellent good people in government who won't let this happen."
- "These negative results are useful but unexciting so let's not publish them, we gotta entertain our readers to stay on the market. We GOTTA TELL INSPIRATIONAL STORIES with our papers. We have to publish exciting papers about which we can also make YouTube videos for our channel." --soyence journals
- "No, you can't research the details of historic events such as Holocaust. It is declared to have happened like this and if you suggest otherwise, you go to prison." (see anti [Holocaust](holocaust.md) denial laws)
- AGE IS JUST A NUMBER! As long as that number is higher or equal to 18, that is :)
- great part of [economics](economics.md)
- Ignoring and/or censoring results of unethical or controversial research, for example the cruel experiment performed by [Nazis](nazi.md), i.e. mixing in political decisions.
- **Absence of evidence is evidence of absence**, but only when it's convenient -- for example "Humans are of recent origin because there is no evidence of older humans existing" (so as to support their claims about human [race](race.md)), or "God doesn't exist because we have no evidence for it", or "5G doesn't cause cancer because science never found that 5G tower radiation would cause cancer" (maybe because science never had the opportunity to compare a million of people living 40 years under 5G radiation with another million of people who live exact same lives, just without 5G?) etc. But when asked about whether life exists anywhere besides Earth they will go "YES YES YES 100% YES, with so many stars and galaxies there MUST be life, [insert Drake's equation here], we just haven't found evidence yes" (here absence of evidence isn't an issue because the claim favors desired science hype). The claim "science found no evidence for X" now practically equates a claim that "science has proven that X is false", which is quite highly fucked up if you think about it.