Update

4chan.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 { haha https://lolwut.info/comp/4chan/4chan-g.html ~drummyfish }
 
-4chan (https://4chan.org/) is the most famous [image board](image_board.md), a website causing controversies by its low [censorship](censorship.md) and a place of great [fun](fun.md), [trolling](troll.md), toxicity and [memes](meme.md). As most image boards, 4chan has a nice, oldschool minimalist look, even though it contains shitty captchas for posting and the site's code is [proprietary](proprietary.md). The site tolerates a great amount of [free speech](free_speech.md) up to the point of being regularly labeled "right-wing extremist site", though it actually censors a lot of stuff and bans for stupid reasons such as harmless [pedo](pedophilia.md) [jokes](jokes.md) are very common (speaking from experience) -- 4chan global rules for example PROHIBIT CRITICISING 4chan (LMAO, rule no. 8), doxxing and call for raids. Being a "rightist paradise" it is commonly seen as a rival to [reddit](reddit.md), aka the [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) paradise -- both forums hate each other to death. The discussion style is pretty nice, there are many nice stories and memes (e.g. the famous [greentexts](greentext.md)) coming from 4chan but it can also be a hugely depressing place just due to the shear number of retards with incorrect opinions.
+4chan (https://4chan.org/, also 4cuck) is the most famous [image board](image_board.md), a website causing controversies by its low [censorship](censorship.md) and a place of great [fun](fun.md), [trolling](troll.md), toxicity and [memes](meme.md). As most image boards, 4chan has a nice, oldschool minimalist look, even though it contains shitty captchas for posting and the site's code is [proprietary](proprietary.md). The site tolerates a great amount of [free speech](free_speech.md) up to the point of being regularly labeled "right-wing extremist site", though it actually censors a lot of stuff and bans for stupid reasons such as harmless [pedo](pedophilia.md) [jokes](jokes.md) are very common (speaking from experience) -- 4chan global rules for example PROHIBIT CRITICISING 4chan (LMAO, rule no. 8), doxxing and call for raids. Being a "rightist paradise" it is commonly seen as a rival to [reddit](reddit.md), aka the [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) paradise -- both forums hate each other to death. The discussion style is pretty nice, there are many nice stories and memes (e.g. the famous [greentexts](greentext.md)) coming from 4chan but it can also be a hugely depressing place just due to the shear number of retards with incorrect opinions.
 
 Just as reddit consists of subcommunities known as subreddits, 4chan consists of different boards (just as other image boards), each with given discussion topic and rules. The most (in)famous boards are likely *politically incorrect* AKA /pol/, where most of the american school shooters hang around, and *random* AKA /b/, the most active board, which is just a shitton of [meme](meme.md) shitposting, [porn](porn.md), [toxicity](toxic.md), [fun](fun.md), [trolling](troll.md) and retardedness.
 

bloat.md

@@ -44,7 +44,17 @@ One of a very frequent questions you may hear a noob ask is **"How can bloat lim
 
 The **path of [degeneracy](degenerate_software.md)** drawn in the graph shows how from a certain breaking point (which may actually appear at different places, the diagram is simplified) many software projects actually start getting less powerful and useful as they get more complex -- not all, some project really do stay on the path of increasing their "richness", but this requires great skills, experience, expertise and also a bit of lucky circumstances; in the zone of huge complexity projects start to get extremely difficult to manage -- non-primary tasks such as organization, maintenance and documentation start taking up so many resources that the primary task of actually programming the software suffers, the project crumbles under its own weight and the developers just try to make it fall slower. This happens mostly in projects made by incompetent [soydevs](soydev.md), i.e. most today's projects. { Thanks to a friend for pointing out this idea. ~drummyfish }
 
-Please note there may arise some disagreement among minimalist group about where the band is drawn exactly, especially old Unix hackers could be heard arguing for allowing even trivial programs, maybe as long as the source code isn't shorter than the utility name, but then the discussion might even shift to questions like "what even is a program vs what's just a 10 characters long line" and so on.
+Please note there may arise some disagreement among minimalist group about where the band is drawn exactly, especially old Unix hackers could be heard arguing for allowing (or even requiring) even trivial programs, maybe as long as the source code isn't shorter than the utility name, but then the discussion might even shift to questions like "what even is a program vs what's just a 10 characters long line" and so on.
+
+As a quick [heuristic](heuristic.md) for judging programs you can really take a look at the lines of code (as long as you know it's a simplification that ignores dependencies, formatting style, language used etc.) and use the following classes (basically derived from how [suckless](suckless.md) programs are often judged):
+
+- < 10: Extremely small but may be useful, may be also too trivial for such small size to be justifiable, can aim to be completely bug-free. Example could be the [cat](cat.md) program.
+- 11 to 100: Very small, can be debugged to a great level, many greatly useful utilities, e.g. [compression](compression.md) programs, may fit this class.
+- 101 to 1000: Quite small "bigger" kinds of programs, often very minimalist implementations of programs that are usually not minimalist in nature like window managers, interactive text editors, web browsers and so on.
+- 1001 to 5000: Still considered small, a bit more "feature rich" kind of previous class, you may find minimalist 3D games here, quite powerful programming languages, libraries handling complex file formats (that weren't designed to be minimalist) etc. Currently a lot of [LRS](lrs.md) programs like [SAF](saf.md), [small3dlib](small3dlib.md) and [comun](comun.md) would fall here.
+- 5001 to 10000: Often imposed upper limit on suckless programs, these programs aren't the smallest possible but may still be called minimalist, they are easily manageable by a single man without much hassle, anyone can modify them and there is a comfortable margin for implementing many "comfort" and fancy features that aren't complete [BS](bullshit.md). [Anarch](anarch.md) might be given as an example (if we subtract lines of code taken by game data and count only pure engine code).
+- 10001 to 100000: Here things start to be called real bloat but may still be accepted as a compromise, not an "insanely bloated" program, we have to judge on a case by case basis as the transition towards bloat is gradual, but generally projects here must focus on not growing bigger, priority should be on minimizing. We have to consider anything here bloat unless proven otherwise. Minimalist projects end up here when trying to combine minimalism with some mainstream concept, e.g. implementing a complete operating system with all the standard features, trying to reimplement some mainstream, non-minimalist program etc. Example is [tcc](tcc.md), the C compiler that has a little over 20000 LOC. Also many "good old" mainstream programs like [Doom](doom.md) fall here.
+- more: Basically just [bloat](bloat.md), some operating systems can perhaps argue they are comparatively small even within this category, but as a matter of fact very few people can manage a codebase this big, issues of bloat start to play a very significant role here, the project should most likely be split or rewritten from scratch in much more simplified way.
 
 Yes, **bloat is also unecological** and no, it cannot be fixed by replacing fossil fuel cars with cars that run on grass and plastic computers by computers made from recycled cardboards mixed with composted horse shit. It is the immense volume of human ACTIVITY that's required by the bloated technology all around the globe that's inherently unecological by wasting so much effort, keeping focus on maximalism, growth and preventing us from frugality and minimizing resource waste. Just as any other [bullshit](bullshit.md) that requires immense resources to just keep maintaining -- great complexity is just absolutely incompatible with ecology and as much as you dislike it, to achieve truly eco-friendly society we'll have to give up what we have now in favor of something orders of magnitude more simple and if you think otherwise, you are just yet too unexperienced (or remained purposefully ignorant) to have seen the big picture already. Consider that your program having bullshit dependencies such as [Python](python.md), [JavaScript](js.md), [C++](cpp.md), [Java](java.md), [OpenGL](opengl.md), [Vulkan](vulkan.md), [GPU](gpu.md), [VR](vr.md) sets, gigabytes of [RAM](ram.md) etcetc. requires having the inherently unecological system up, it needs millions of people doing bullshit jobs that are inherently wasting resources, increasing CO2 and making them not focus on things that have to be done -- yes, even if we replace plastic straws with [paper straws](greenwashing.md). All those people that make the thousand pages standards that are updated every year, reviews of those standards, writing tons and tons of tests for implementations of those standards, electing other people to make those standards, testing their tests, implementing the standards themselves, optimizing them, all of that collectively needing many billions of lines of code and millions of hours of non-programming activities, it all requires complex bureaucracy, organization and management (complex [version control systems](vcs.md), wikis, buildings, meeting spaces, ...) and communication tools and tons of other bullshit recursively spawning more and more waste -- all of these people require cars to go to work every day (even if some work from home, ultimately only a few can work from home 100% of the time and even so millions others need to physically go to factories to make all those computers, electricity, chair, food and other things those people need), they require keeping a high bandwidth 100% uptime global Internet network maintained, all of this requiring extra buildings, offices, factories, roads, buildings for governments overseeing the building of those buildings, maintenance of those roads etcetc. A newbie programmer (99.99999% programmers in the field nowadays) just don't see all this because they lack the big picture, a woman forced into programming has hard time comprehending an if statement, how do you expect her to see the deep interconnections between technology and society -- she may know that OpenGL is "something with graphics" and it's just there on every computer by default, she can't even picture the complexity that's behind what she sees on the screen. Hence the overall retardation. You just cannot have people living ecologically and at the same time have what we have now. So yes, by supporting and/or creating bloat you are killing the planet, whether you agree with it or not. No, you can't find excuses out of this, no, paper straws won't help, just admit you love point and click "programming without math" of your own shitty Minecraft clones in Godot even for the price of eliminating all life on Earth, that's fine (no it's not but it's better to just not bullshit oneself).
 

bullshit.md

@@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ Some things that are bullshit include:
 - [jobs](work.md)
 - [law](law.md)
 - [licenses](license.md)
+- "life coaching" [lmao](lmao.md)
 - [marketing](marketing.md), ads
 - [money](money.md)
 - [police](police.md)

cc0.md

@@ -10,4 +10,4 @@ CC0 is recommended by [LRS](lrs.md) for both programs and other art -- however f
 
 It's nice that CC0 became quite widely used and you can find a lot of material under this waiver, but **BEWARE**, if you find something under CC0, do verify it's actually valid, normies often don't know what CC0 means and happily post derivative works of proprietary stuff under CC0.
 
-Some **things under CC0** include Librivox audiobooks, [Dusk OS](duskos.md), great many things on [Wikimedia Commons](wikimedia_commons.md), opengameart, Blendswap and freesound, whole [Esolang Wiki](esolang.md), OSdev Wiki (since 2011), [Encyclopedia Dramatica](dramatica.md), [LRS](lrs.md) software ([Anarch](anarch.md), [small3dlib](small3dlib.md), [raycastlib](raycastlib.md), [SAF](saf.md), [comun](comun.md)), Lix (libre game), evlisp minimalist [Lisp](lisp.md) (from book "Lisp From Nothing") and many others.
+Some **things under CC0** include Librivox audiobooks, [Dusk OS](duskos.md), [Wikidata](wikidata.md) database, great many things on sites like [Wikimedia Commons](wikimedia_commons.md), [opengameart](oga.md) (see e.g. Kenney), Blendswap, freesound etc., whole [Esolang Wiki](esolang.md), OSdev Wiki (since 2011), [Encyclopedia Dramatica](dramatica.md), [LRS](lrs.md) software ([Anarch](anarch.md), [small3dlib](small3dlib.md), [raycastlib](raycastlib.md), [SAF](saf.md), [comun](comun.md)) and [LRS wiki](lrs_wiki.md), [books](books.md) like *The Pig and the Box* (anti [DRM](drm.md) child story) or *[Cost of Freedom](cost_of_freedom.md)*, some [fonts](font.md) by dotcolon, Lix (libre game), evlisp minimalist [Lisp](lisp.md) (from book "Lisp From Nothing") and many others.

chess.md

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Chess as a game is not and cannot be [copyrighted](copyright.md), but **can ches
 
 ## Chess In General
 
-Chess evolved from ancient board games in India in about 6th century. Nowadays the game is internationally governed by **FIDE** which has taken the on role of an authority that defines the official rules: FIDE rules are considered to be the standard chess rules. FIDE also organizes tournaments, promotes the game and keeps a list of registered players whose performance it rates with so called Elo system --⁠ based on the performance it also grants titles such as **Grandmaster** (GM, strongest), **Internation Master** (IM, second strongest) or **Candidate Master** (CM). A game of chess is so interesting in itself that chess is usually not played for money like many other games ([poker](poker.md), [backgammon](backgammon.md), ...).
+Chess evolved from ancient board games in India (most notably Chaturanga) in about 6th century -- some sources say that in chess predecessor games dice was used to determine which man a player was allowed to move but that once dice were banned because of hazard games, we got the variant without any element of chance. Nowadays the game is internationally governed by **FIDE** which has taken the on role of an authority that defines the official rules: FIDE rules are considered to be the standard chess rules. FIDE also organizes tournaments, promotes the game and keeps a list of registered players whose performance it rates with so called Elo system --⁠ based on the performance it also grants titles such as **Grandmaster** (GM, strongest), **Internation Master** (IM, second strongest) or **Candidate Master** (CM). A game of chess is so interesting in itself that chess is usually not played for money like many other games ([poker](poker.md), [backgammon](backgammon.md), ...).
 
 The mastery of chess is often divided into two main areas (it is also common to divide strong players into these two categories depending on where their main strength lies):
 
@@ -219,8 +219,8 @@ Besides similar games such as [shogi](shogi.md) there are many variants of chess
 - **old chess**: The rules of chess itself have been changing over time (e.g. adding the 50 move rule etc.). The older rule sets can be seen as variants as well.
 - **puzzle**: For single player, chess positions are presented and the player has to find the best move or sequence of moves.
 - **racing kings**: The starting position has both players on the same side, the goal is to get one's king to the other side first.
-- **[non-Euclidean](non_euclidean.md)**: different geometries of the board, e.g. [hyperbolic](hyperbolic.md) or [spherical](spherical.md).
+- **different board geometries/topologies:** e.g. [non-Euclidean](non_euclidean.md) ([hyperbolic](hyperbolic.md), [spherical](spherical.md), [torus](torus.md), ...), hexagonal chess (had some considerable following) etc.
-- **3D chess**: [3D](3d.md) generalization of chess.
+- **3D chess**: [3D](3d.md) generalization of chess, possible are also other dimensions (4D, 5D, ... maybe even 1D?).
 - **randomly chosen variant**: Here a chess variant to be played is chosen at random before the game, e.g. by dice roll. { This is an idea I got, not sure if this exists or has a different name. ~drummyfish }
 
 ## Playing Tips
@@ -295,6 +295,7 @@ Chess is only mildly [bloated](bloat.md) but what if we try to unbloat it comple
 - [checkers](checkers.md)
 - [advance wars](advance_wars.md)
 - [backgammon](backgammon.md)
+- [Catan](catan.md)
 - [Deep Blue](deep_blue.md)
 - [stockfish](stockfish.md)
 - [anal bead](anal_bead.md)

comun.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Comun
 
-Comun is a [beautiful](beauty.md), greatly [minimalist](minimalism.md) [programming language](programming_language.md) made by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md), based on his ideals of good, [selfless](selflessness.md) [technology](technology.md) known as *[less retarded software](lrs.md)* (LRS), of which it is now considered the official programming language. In the future it should gradually replace [C](c.md) as the preferred LRS language. The language has been inspired mainly by [Forth](forth.md), but also [C](c.md), [brainfuck](brainfuck.md) and other ones. Though already usable, it is still in quite early stages of development and work in progress; currently there is a [suckless](suckless.md) implementation of comun in [C](c.md) and a number of supplemental materials such as a specification, tutorial and some example programs. The project repository is currently at https://codeberg.org/drummyfish/comun. The aim now is to make a [self hosted](self_hosting.md) implementation, i.e. write comun in comun. Though very young, **comun is probably already the best programming language ever conceived**.
+Comun is a [beautiful](beauty.md), greatly [minimalist](minimalism.md) [programming language](programming_language.md) made by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md), based on his ideals of good, [selfless](selflessness.md) [technology](technology.md) known as *[less retarded software](lrs.md)* (LRS), of which it is now considered the official programming language, though still a greatly work in progress one. In the future it should gradually replace [C](c.md) as the preferred LRS language, however let's keep in mind the language is still highly experimental and work in progress, it may yet change more or less. The language has been inspired mainly by [Forth](forth.md) but also [C](c.md), [brainfuck](brainfuck.md) and other ones. Though already usable, it is still in quite early stages of development; currently there is a [suckless](suckless.md) implementation of comun in [C](c.md) and a number of supplemental materials such as a specification, tutorial and some example programs. The project repository is currently at https://codeberg.org/drummyfish/comun. The aim now is to make a [self hosted](self_hosting.md) implementation, i.e. write comun in comun. Though very young, **comun is probably already the best programming language ever conceived** :-)
 
 { NOTE: I found a language on esolang wiki called *Minim* that looks a bit similar to comun, however it looks a bit sucky. Anyway it should be researched more. ~drummyfish }
 

faq.md

@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ There are many reasons, it serves multiple purposes which also change a bit over
 - It makes me (and hopefully others) learn about and research quite obscure things, I have personally discovered so many new amazing things while writing this wiki. Browsing the Internet is sometimes not enough, writing about something is what makes you go deeper.
 - I hope to contribute to the downfall of capitalism, though TBH I don't believe it can happen at this point.
 - This also helped me find some cool online friends. If you go searching for people like you, you won't find them, but if you put your ideas publicly on the display, people with similar ideas will reach out to you themselves.
+- It's a work I can read myself knowing I won't find things that make me more suicidal like the word "person" and stupid grammar mistakes such as using apostrophes for plurals, using "it's" instead of "its", sentences containing "the reason is because" or "just because ... doesn't mean" etc.
 - Probably other reasons I couldn't recall right now :-)
 - ...
 

feminism.md

@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ Some notable things feminists managed to achieve are:
 
 { [LMAO](lmao.md), **a supposed woman writer who won 1 million euro prize turned out to actually be three men writers**, see Carmen Mola :) Also the recent "historically first all female space walk" during which they managed to lose $100K worth of equipment :D ~drummyfish }
 
-If anything's clear, then that feminism is not at all about gender equality but about hatred towards men and female superiority. Firstly feminism is not called *gender equality movement* but *feminism*, i.e. for-female, and as we know, [name plays a huge role](name_is_important.md). Imagine this: if you asked feminists if they could right now implement matriarchy in society, i.e. female ruling over man, how many of them do you think would answer "no"? There is not even a shadow of a doubt a vast majority would absolutely answer "yes", we may at best argue about if it would be 85% or 99% of them. So the question of feminist goals is absolutely clearly answered, there is no point in trying to deny it. To a feminist man is what a [jew](jew.md) was to the Nazi; the whole story is repeated again, we have yet again not learned a bit from our history. Indeed, women have historically been oppressed and needed support, but once women reach social equality -- which has basically already happened a long time ago now -- feminist movement will, if only by [social inertia](social_inertia.md), keep pursuing more advantages for women (what else should a movement called *feminism* do?), i.e. at this point the new goal has already become female superiority. In the age of capital no one is going to just dissolve a movement because it has already reached its goal, such a movement present political capital one will simply not throw out of window, so feminists will forever keep saying they're being oppressed and will forever keep inventing new bullshit issues to keep [fighting](fight_culture.md). Note for example that feminists care about things such as wage gap but of course absolutely don't give a damn about opposite direction inequality, such as men dying on average much younger than women etc. -- feminism cares about women, not equality. And of course, when men establish "men rights" movements, suddenly feminists see those as "fascist", "toxic" and "violent" and try to destroy such movements.
+If anything's clear, then that feminism is not at all about gender equality but about hatred towards men and female superiority. Firstly feminism is not called *gender equality movement* but *feminism*, i.e. for-female, literally "womanism", and as we know, [name plays a huge role](name_is_important.md). Imagine this: if you asked feminists if they could right now implement matriarchy in society, i.e. female ruling over man, how many of them do you think would answer "no"? There is not even a shadow of a doubt a vast majority would absolutely answer "yes", we may at best argue about if it would be 85% or 99% of them. So the question of feminist goals is absolutely clearly answered, there is no point in trying to deny it. To a feminist a man is what a [jew](jew.md) was to the Nazi or what the Christian was to the Romans who famously hunted Christians down and fed them to the lions because they refused to bow to their polytheist ideology (nowadays analogous to e.g. refusing to practice [political correctness](political_correctness.md)). The whole story is repeated again, we have yet again not learned a bit from our [history](history.md). Indeed, women have historically been oppressed and needed support, but once women reach social equality -- which has basically already happened a long time ago now -- feminist movement will, if only by [social inertia](social_inertia.md), keep pursuing more advantages for women (what else should a movement called *feminism* do?), i.e. at this point the new goal has already become female superiority. In the age of capital no one is going to just dissolve a movement because it has already reached its goal, such a movement present political capital one will simply not throw out of window, so feminists will forever keep saying they're being oppressed and will forever keep inventing new bullshit issues to keep [fighting](fight_culture.md). Note for example that feminists care about things such as wage gap but of course absolutely don't give a damn about opposite direction inequality, such as men dying on average much younger than women etc. -- feminism cares about women, not equality. And of course, when men establish "men rights" movements, suddenly feminists see those as "fascist", "toxic" and "violent" and try to destroy such movements.
 
 { I really have no issues with women, I truly love everyone, but I do pay attention to statistics. One of the biggest things feminism achieved for me in this regard is that now it's simply not enough for me to see a woman achieve success in society to be convinced she is skilled or capable, a woman getting PhD to me nowadays automatically just means she got it because she's a woman and we need more quotas of "strong women in SCIENCE". In the past I didn't see it this way, a woman that did something notable back then was mostly convincing to me. Nowadays I just require much better evidence to believe she is good at something, e.g. seeing something truly good she created -- to be honest, I now don't recall any woman in "modern times" to have convinced me, but I am really open to it and just waiting to be proven wrong. ~drummyfish }
 

good_enough.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # Good Enough
 
-A good enough solution to a problem is a solution that solves the problem satisfyingly (not necessarily precisely or completely) while achieving minimal cost (effort, complexity, [maintenance](maintenance.md), implementation time etc.). This is contrasted with an [overkill](overkill.md), a solution that's "too good" (for a higher cost). For example a word-for-word translation of a text is a primitive way of translation, but it may be good enough to understand the meaning of the text; in many climates a tent is a good enough accommodation solution while a luxury house is a solution of better quality (more comfortable, safe, ...) for a higher cost.
+A good enough solution to a problem is a solution that solves the problem satisfyingly (not necessarily precisely or completely) while achieving minimal cost (effort, complexity, [maintenance](maintenance.md), implementation time etc.). This is contrasted with an [overkill](overkill.md), a solution that's "too good" (for a higher cost). For example a word-for-word translation of a text is a primitive way of translation, but it may be good enough to understand the meaning of the text; in many climates a tent is a good enough accommodation solution while a luxury house is a solution of better quality (more comfortable, safe, ...) for a higher cost. It's been said that the [perfect is the enemy of good](perfect_is_the_enemy_of_good.md).
 
 To give an example from the world of programming, [bubble sort](bubble_sort.md) is in many cases better than quick sort for its simplicity, even though it's much slower than more advanced sorts. [ASCII](ascii.md) is mostly good enough compared to [Unicode](unicode.md). And so on.
 

how_to.md

@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@ This is a summary of some main guidelines on how an LRS supporter should behave
 - **Reject harmful things like [proprietary](proprietary.md) software, [capitalism](capitalism.md), [copyright](copyright.md), [bloat](bloat.md), [work](work.md) etc.** Use and promote the ethical equivalents, i.e. [free software](free_software.md), [free culture](free_culture.md), frugality, [anarchism](anarchism.md) etc.
 - **[Don't argue with retards](cant_argue_with_idiot.md)** with the goal of convincing him or winning the argument so that you feel good (the meaning of retard here is simply someone disagreeing with LRS). It's literally wasted time/energy and it's bad for your mental health, it leads nowhere and achieves nothing but make your more suicidal than you already are. You literally can NOT convince anyone who is not open to being convinced, it is impossible, even if you have 100000 mathematical proofs, real world evidence, literature supporting you and anything you can imagine, you cannot logically convince someone who doesn't know how logic works or someone who simply emotionally isn't ready to change his mind. In 99.999999999999999% cases you can tell if it's worth to talk to someone after his first reaction -- you present an idea, such as LRS, and if he just expresses disagreement, there is no point in communicating further, by the disagreement he has taken a defensive stance and will hold it for the rest of his life now, you have to go find someone else. NO, not even if he's an "intellectual", has PhD and thirty Nobel Prizes, if he doesn't wanna see the truth, you cannot help him. As it's been said, trying to argue with an idiot is like trying to win a chess game against a pidgeon -- even if you're the world chess champion, the pidgeon will just shit on the board and think it's won. If you spot a retard, just leave -- don't try to have the last word or anything, even admit him "victory" in the argument and leave him in his world of delusion where he is the unappreciated Einstein, just do not waste an extra second on him, just leave and go do something better. { So many such idiots I have met I can't even count it -- pure stupid peasant aren't even that bad, the wost are the "above averge" intelligence reddit atheists who think they're smart. I literally had such people argue like "you like games therefore competition in society is good because games are part of society therefore society equals competition". Truly I'm not sure if those bastards are just trolling me into suicide or are really so fucking dumb :D ~drummyfish }
 - Similarly **avoid [toxic](toxic.md) communities**, don't argue, just leave, it's better to be alone than in bad company. Basically anything with a COC, language filter, SJW vibe, rainbow etc. isn't even more worth checking out.
-- **Be a [generalist](generalism.md), see the big picture, study the whole world, educate yourself**, do not become overspecialized in the capitalist way. Sure you may become an expert at something, but not for the price of making your view of the world too narrow. You may spend most of your time studying and programming computer compilers for example, but still do (and enjoy) other things, for example reading fiction, studying religions, languages, psychology, playing [go](go.md), making music, building houses, painting, doing sports, ... Learn to enjoy to educate yourself! Education (not necessarily formal) is one of the most valuable things you can get -- no one can take it away from you, it makes you see truth more clearly and though this itself makes you more depressed, it also frees you in many ways, for example knowing languages enables you to read more books and live in more places and talk to more people and you can get a comfy job as a translator if you need money, knowing chess makes you able to entertain yourself without a computer, knowing programming enables you to write your own programs if good ones aren't available, and so on. Education makes you see through other people's lies. It is fine to be retarded, remain ignorant and just play video games all days, your value as a living being will lower that way, but you will forever remain among the retarded majority manipulated by the tides of society, even if you have good opinions and correct views, you'll stay just another retard, you won't be able to help others, you'll be paralyzed, leaving the burden and joy of helping the world on others -- just decide if that is what you want. Have you always admired that someone can play a piano? Why not learn it then? Get some cheap keyboard and make it a habit to practice playing it at least 20 minutes every other day, see how good you become in a year. Were you always bad at chemistry? Why not fix it a bit? Get some chemistry for dummies book and read it every day before sleep, you will go from absolute chemistry retard to well above average soon. You can learn about start constelations, biology, history, train card games, memorize pi digits, run half marathon, learn juggling, write your own small book etcetc. A nice life hack is to **see life as an RPG game**, see yourself as a character you are improving, by improving skills you are unlocking new abilities, enabling new options, increasing your stats -- however be very careful to not become competitive or fall victim to the ["self-improvement" cult](productivity_cult.md)! The key is to not start comparing yourself to other, or rather to not have it as a goal to be better than someone else, the goal should be just your happiness of becoming a higher level living entity that has more abilities for helping other, enjoy the universe and so on.
+- **Be a [generalist](generalism.md), see the big picture, study the whole world, educate yourself** -- tantum possumus quantum scimus, what we can do is given by what we know. Do not become overspecialized in the capitalist way. Sure you may become an expert at something, but not for the price of making your view of the world too narrow. You may spend most of your time studying and programming computer compilers for example, but still do (and enjoy) other things, for example reading fiction, studying religions, languages, psychology, playing [go](go.md), making music, building houses, painting, doing sports, ... Learn to enjoy to educate yourself! Education (not necessarily formal) is one of the most valuable things you can get -- no one can take it away from you, it makes you see truth more clearly and though this itself makes you more depressed, it also frees you in many ways, for example knowing languages enables you to read more books and live in more places and talk to more people and you can get a comfy job as a translator if you need money, knowing chess makes you able to entertain yourself without a computer, knowing programming enables you to write your own programs if good ones aren't available, and so on. Education makes you see through other people's lies. It is fine to be retarded, remain ignorant and just play video games all days, your value as a living being will lower that way, but you will forever remain among the retarded majority manipulated by the tides of society, even if you have good opinions and correct views, you'll stay just another retard, you won't be able to help others, you'll be paralyzed, leaving the burden and joy of helping the world on others -- just decide if that is what you want. Have you always admired that someone can play a piano? Why not learn it then? Get some cheap keyboard and make it a habit to practice playing it at least 20 minutes every other day, see how good you become in a year. Were you always bad at chemistry? Why not fix it a bit? Get some chemistry for dummies book and read it every day before sleep, you will go from absolute chemistry retard to well above average soon. You can learn about start constelations, biology, history, train card games, memorize pi digits, run half marathon, learn juggling, write your own small book etcetc. A nice life hack is to **see life as an RPG game**, see yourself as a character you are improving, by improving skills you are unlocking new abilities, enabling new options, increasing your stats -- however be very careful to not become competitive or fall victim to the ["self-improvement" cult](productivity_cult.md)! The key is to not start comparing yourself to other, or rather to not have it as a goal to be better than someone else, the goal should be just your happiness of becoming a higher level living entity that has more abilities for helping other, enjoy the universe and so on.
 - **Stop just bitching around and DO SOMETHING** -- don't get this wrong, bitching around and ranting is great, this whole wiki is just one huge wall of rage bitching, however if it's all you do, it literally achieves nothing, it won't convince a single man, no one will read that shit, you are just wasting huge part of your life by being angry on the Internet. First thing you have to do is DO SOMETHING, e.g. if you promote minimalism, go and make a minimalist game, show others it works, prove (even to yourself) the thing you believe in is good, bitching about the world is only to come as a supplement to your main work -- your rants aren't there to convince anyone, your art does that, your writings are there for the people who are already convinced to help them educate themselves further. Consider this: you may spend whole life writing 100 books about how minimalism is awesome, you may examine the whole history in detail, provide mathematical proofs of everything and suggest a completely working system that could be established to solve all the problems in the world -- no one is going to read this. Literally not a single man will give a shit. On the other hand you can take a year to program a minimalist operating system, one that is 1000 times smaller than Linux and is 10 times faster and is completely public domain and basically rapes Linux in every other way, you just post that somewhere and people just can't ignore it, you put before their eyes something they can literally see is infinitely better than what was there before, you instantly get thousands of people hooked and they start creating more art like this. You just changed the world significant for the better in just one year. Note this isn't an argument for chasing popularity at all, on the contrary, your actions will likely contradict the popular and even cause a lot of hate, however realize that words are just words, there are too many words everywhere, words can lie and they never achieve anything by themselves, good is achieved and proven by actions.
 - **Should you go vote?** The safe answer is no, most likely you shouldn't vote, not voting is in 99.99% cases the best thing as you can just avoid all noise and stress of watching politics at all, you won't waste your time and you also actively vote against the current system by not voting: you decrease the voter turnout, decreasing trust in the system -- there is a reason all politics agree on the one thing that "you should go vote" -- they do because that sustains trust that gives them power, so as it's mostly the case, mainstream clearly pushing you to something basically means it's the one thing you should almost definetely NOT do. A deeper answer to the question of voting is again that you should weight all pros and cons, but you will conclude the pros are so unlikely to prevail that only in an extremely rare situation it would make sense to go vote. You should go vote only if there appears a "party" that's extremely based -- this party should be extremely aligned with LRS, wanting to end all work, military, money, police, all by strictly peaceful ways and eventually end even state and itself too -- something we have practically a zero chance of seeing in the next few hundred years, and even if such "party" appeared in theory and you went vote for it, it almost definitely won't win as normies just won't vote for it, so you change nothing anyway. Definitely do NOT go vote for lesser evil, that's just strengthens the system. Just stop watching politics and let the system destroy itself, you won't be able to influence it by voting in any way no matter what, even if your voting power was multiplied by one million, it just doesn't even matter which party is ruling nowadays. Stop caring about current politics, spend the time on better things. If the base party appears, the news will get to you anyway.
 - **Live your life as you want**, don't let someone else control your life and manipulate you, e.g. with feelings of guilt -- this often happens with your parents, partner, friends, culture, laws, ... This isn't an argument for self interest! On the contrary, most people nowadays will try to push you to following self interest or fascist goals that will also benefit them. You only have one life, others have theirs, so listen to advice but remember to always make your own decisions in important things. If you feel you don't want to go to school or that you don't want to work or that you want to do something that people despise or you want to do something that you've read is wrong, just do what you feel is best, even if it's a let down for your family or if it contradicts what the whole society is telling you.

iq.md

@@ -68,6 +68,8 @@ TODO
 
 It's been observed that the **IQ of a group** is roughly equal to the IQ of its least intelligent member divided by the number of group members.
 
+**Why are rich people dumb and smart people poor?** Let's clarify this because there is a very common misconception, purposefully established by capitalist propaganda, that rich people are smart and vice versa, while the opposite is always true. Firstly succeeding on the market is basically just lottery, it's more about luck than anything else -- no one can predict the market, it's literally about betting on the right card and then being in many right places at right times. At best if anything gives you better odds, it's having a starting capital, knowing someone in the business, living in a good location etc., but not being smart. No matter what anyone tells you, business is at best an educated bet and a businessman is at best as smart as your average slot machine addict. Now of course, just by statistics, the few people who win the lottery are likely to fall in the majority, i.e. around the average IQ. This is additionally further biased towards lower IQ because success in business is actually favored by lower IQ for a number of reasons. One of them is a stupider man is going to make just plain stupid big risks, have the capitalism-aligned short term mindset, and making stupid risks is how you more likely win the game -- it is also how you more likely lose, but no one cares about the losers, these just disappear. It's like seeing what kind of people survive running through a minefield -- you will find only retards make it because only a retard would attempt it; many of them will die but some manage to run through by sheer luck, while all the smart people just retain from even trying to run through the mine field. That's why so many of the famous rich guys always made some hilariously risky moves like selling everything they had and putting it into their business -- that's just extremely retarded, only 1 in a million will succeed like that, but of course by survivorship bias you will only hear about those who succeed like this so they look smart (plus they will pay for their own propaganda painting them as smart), but no, it's still incredibly stupid. Furthermore success in business is about lack of morality to which intelligence is an obstacle -- an intelligent man sees that investing in some business will e.g. lead to someone in the third world dying, so for a smart man doing business is literally as if he had to murder people for money, which most normal people wouldn't do, but with the extra layer of indirection stupid people can't see the harm they do to others and they happily murder people without even realizing it. Again, this is why the rich guys are incredibly stupid assholes behaving like angry aggressive chimpanzees to their employees, like for example [Steve Jobs](steve_jobs.md) or [Elon Musk](elon_musk.md), they just lack brain cells that you need for empathy. Yet another reason why smart people aren't rich is simply that they see that pursuing money is incredibly retarded, it's just satisfying low material and social needs, it's just like overeating, drug addiction or gambling, it's an arbitrarily set unhealthy goal that achieves nothing but waste one's life on counting pieces of green paper while doing bullshit and immense harm as a side effect, smart people see through this, they want something more from life, they want to spend time with their family, create something that helps others, make art and so on, so they just won't go after money and they even turn down money if they can have it (see e.g. Grigori Perelman).
+
 ## Real Genius VS Pseudogenius
 
 Most people are called a genius nowadays -- any recent so called "genius" (such as [Steve Jobs](steve_jobs.md)) is in fact most likely of below average IQ; just barely above mediocre idea someone comes up with by chance will be celebrated as that of a genius, **real genius ideas will be met with hostility**; real genius ideas are too good and too far ahead and unacceptable to normal people. Furthermore success in [business](business.md) requires lack of intelligence so as to be unable to see the consequences of one's actions. Your cat watching you solve Riemann hypothesis will not even know what's happening, to it you are a retard wasting time on sliding a stick over table, on the other hand the cat will judge a monkey capable of opening a can of cat food a genius. Society is composed solely of idiots, they can only see if someone is a tiny bit better at what they do than them, and those they celebrate, if you are light years ahead of them they don't even have the capacity to comprehend how good you are at what you do because they can't even comprehend the thing you do. This includes even [PhD](phd.md)s and people with several Nobel Prizes, everyone except the few supporters of [LRS](lrs.md) are just blind idiots playing along with the system, some lucky to succeed in it and some not. This is why shit technology is prospering and [LRS](lrs.md) is being overlooked. It's just another confirmation our ideas as superior.

jesus.md

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ This is a quick summary of life and death of Jesus Christ, mostly according to t
 
 { There is a nice safe public domain book from 1898, digitized on gutenberg.org, called *Bible Pictures and Stories in Large Print* -- it's a very nice, quite short retelling of the Bible, with nice pictures, like a Bible tl;dr. Check it out. ~drummyfish }
 
-Jesus was **born** around 6 to 4 BC in Bethlehem (in Israel) to Mary and Joseph, with Mary still being a virgin (which is a miracle claimed by Bible, denied by historians and even some churches); his father is said to be God, Mary was made pregnant by Holy Spirit. Jesus grew up in Nazareth and became a carpenter, as Joseph. Even as young he was very knowledgeable of the scripture.
+Jesus was **born** around 6 to 4 BC (this offset is cause by an error made in Middle Ages when they wrongly calculated his birth year, the error was only revealed once year counting had already been long established) in Bethlehem (in Israel) to Mary and Joseph, with Mary still being a virgin (which is a miracle claimed by Bible, denied by historians and even some churches); his father is said to be God, Mary was made pregnant by Holy Spirit. Jesus grew up in Nazareth and became a carpenter, as Joseph. Even as young he was very knowledgeable of the scripture.
 
 An important event was the **baptism** (the ritual of "purification by water") of Jesus in Jordan river by John the Baptist around 28 AD. This is seen as a real historical event nowadays. John the Baptist was a preacher who foretold the coming of Jesus and some of his followers then started to follow Jesus.
 

lrs_dictionary.md

@@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ WORK IN PROGRESS
 | [anime](anime.md)                          | tranime                                |
 | [Apple](apple.md) user                     | iToddler                               |
 | [Asperger](autism.md)                      | assburger                              |
-| average citizen                            | normie, normalfag, bloatoddler, NPC    |
+| average citizen                            |normie, normalfag, bloatoddler, NPC, ...|
 | [Blender](blender.md)                      | Blunder                                |
 | [censorship](censorship.md)                | censorshit                             |
 | [CEO](ceo.md)                              | capitalist evil oppressor              |
@@ -56,6 +56,7 @@ WORK IN PROGRESS
 | neurotypical                               | typical retard                         |
 | [NFS](nfs.md)                              | nightmare file system                  |
 | [Nintendo](nintendo.md)                    | Nintendont                             |
+| [NSA](nsa.md)                              | national spying agency                 |
 | [NVidia](nvidia.md)                        | NoVidya                                |
 | object oriented programming ([OOP](oop.md))| object obsessed programming            |
 | object oriented                            | objectfuscated                         |

main.md

@@ -94,6 +94,7 @@ Are you a noob but see our ideas as appealing and would like to join us? Say no
 - That there is no simple formula for calculating the perimeter of an [ellipse](ellipse.md)?
 - In 3rd world [pigeons carrying SD cards](ip_over_pigeon.md) are still much faster and reliable way of transferring data than [internet service providers](isp.md)? This also avoids [censorship](censorship.md).
 - That [compiler bomb](compiler_bomb.md) is a very short source code that makes the language compiler produce gigantic executable?
+- That there is a light bulb in California that has been turned on since 1901 and as of writing this is still working? This shows that [old](old.md) things are better than those manufactured under more advanced [capitalism](capitalism.md) which pushes for more [consumerism](consumerism.md) and applies [artificial obsolescence](artificial_obscolescence.md). Many sowing machines made mode than 100 years ago still function perfectly fine as well as many other types of machines; anything created nowadays shouldn't be expected to last longer than 3 years.
 - That throughout [history](history.md) one of the most common patterns is appearance of new lucrative technology or trend which is labeled safe by [science](soyence.md), then officially recommended, promoted, adopted by the industry and heavily utilized for many years to decades before being found harmful, which is almost always greatly delayed by the industry trying to hide this fact? This was the case e.g. with [asbestos](asbestos.md), [freons](freon.md) (responsible for ozone layer depletion), [x rays](x_ray.md), radioactive paint (see *radium girls*), [plastics](plastic.md), smoking and great many prescription drugs among which used to be even cocaine. Yet when you question safety of a new lucrative invention, such as [5G](5g.md), antidepressants or some quickly developed [vaccines](vax.md), you are labeled insane.
 
 ## Topics

minimalism.md

@@ -12,20 +12,24 @@ There is also the generalized concept of **life minimalism** which applies said
 
 There is a so called *[airplane rule](airplane_rule.md)* that states a plane with two engines has twice as many engine problems than a plane with a single engine.
 
-Up until recently in history every engineer would tell you that *the better machine is that with fewer moving parts*. This still seems to hold e.g. in [mathematics](math.md), a field not yet so spoiled by huge commercialization and mostly inhabited by the smartest people -- there is a tendency to look for the most minimal equations -- such equations are considered [beautiful](beauty.md). Science also knows this rule as the [Occam's razor](occams_razor.md). In technology invaded by aggressive commercialization the situation is different, minimalism lives only in the underground and is ridiculed by the mainstream propaganda. Some of the minimalist movements, terms and concepts include:
+Up until recently in history every engineer would tell you that *the better machine is that with fewer moving parts*. This still seems to hold e.g. in [mathematics](math.md), a field not yet so spoiled by huge commercialization and mostly inhabited by the smartest people -- there is a tendency to look for the most minimal equations -- such equations are considered [beautiful](beauty.md). Science also knows this rule as the [Occam's razor](occams_razor.md). In technology invaded by aggressive commercialization the situation is different, minimalism lives only in the underground and is ridiculed by the mainstream propaganda. Some the minimalist movements, terms and concepts at least somewhat connected to minimalism include (watch out for SJWs, [pseudominimalism](pseudominimalism.md), Nazis etc., we don't automatically fully embrace all things on this list):
 
 - [suckless](suckless.md)
-- [Unix philosophy](unix_philosophy.md)
+- [cat-v](cat_v.md)
-- [KISS](kiss.md)
+- [bitreich](bitreich.md)
-- [countercomplex](countercomplex.md), [permacomputing](permacomputing_wiki.md)
+- [Collapse OS](collapseos.md)/[Dusk OS](duskos.md), [collapse](collapse.md) computing
 - [less retarded software](lrs.md)
-- [Bitreich](bitreich.md)
+- [Unix philosophy](unix_philosophy.md)
+- [KISS](kiss.md) (see also [lightweight](lightweight.md))
+- [countercomplex](countercomplex.md)
+- [permacomputing](permacomputing_wiki.md)
 - [less is more](less_is_more.md)/[worse is better](worse_is_better.md)
 - [appropriate technology](appropriate_tech.md)
-- [reactionary software](reactionary_software.md), though bordering with [pseudominimalism](pseudominimalism.md)
+- [reactionary software](reactionary_software.md) (bordering with [pseudominimalism](pseudominimalism.md))
-- [plan9](plan9.md) and its followers and/or groups hanging around it, e.g. [cat-v](cat_v.md) or [100rabbits](100rabbit.md) (though bordering with [pseudominimalism](pseudominimalism.md))
+- [plan9](plan9.md), [openbsd](openbsd.md), KISS GNU/Linux and similar (however often obsessed with [bloatcryption](encryption.md), may contain [pseudominimalism](pseudominimalism.md))
-- [Collapse OS](collapseos.md)/[Dusk OS](duskos.md)
+- [100rabbits](100rabbit.md) (beware of [SJW](sjw.md) poison)
-- [permacomputing](permacomputing.md) ([SJW](sjw.md) warning)
+- [small Internet](small_internet.md), [gopher](gopher.md), [gemini](gemini.md) (not worth checking out: SJW, pseudominimalism and bloatcryption), web 1.0, ...
+- [primitivism](primitivism.md), [low tech](low_tech.md), [degrowth](degrowth.md), ...
 - ...
 
 Under [capitalism](capitalism.md) technological minimalism is suppressed in the mainstream as it goes against [corporate](corporation.md) interests, i.e. those of having monopoly control over technology, even if such technology is "[FOSS](foss.md)" (which then becomes just a cool brand, see [openwashing](openwashing.md)). We may, at best, encounter a "shallow" kind of minimalism, so called [pseudominimalism](pseudominimalism.md) which only tries to make things appear minimal, e.g. aesthetically, and hides ugly overcomplicated internals under the facade. [Apple](apple.md) is infamous for this [shit](shit.md).

permacomputing_wiki.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Permacomputing wiki is a computer [minimalist](minimalism.md) [pseudoleftist](ps
 
 **Late 2023 sum up of the wiki's issues**: it seems like a few users just care about computers and try to write cool stuff about technology while clashing with a few political fanatics who just want to push pseudoleftist propaganda, ridiculously trying to find ways to somehow insert feminism and [LGBT](lgbt.md) to core principles of technology design :D It's really awkward and creates conflicts in articles e.g. about [Rust](rust.md) where feminists really want to push it as the best thing ever while the educated minimalist just can NOT ever accept Rust as a good language, not even by a huge margin. That's all just funny but what's more, there seem to be even [censorship](censorship.md) going on as for example the political activists seem to prefer shitty [Gemini](gemini.md) just for its political message and MUH ENCRYPTION (which, again, clashes with the need of minimalism) over superior [Gopher](gopher.md) (a clear preferred choice for true minimalist) and so they JUST DON'T MENTION GOPHER AT ALL, even in the article on [smol net](smol_internet.md) where it is just a key thing to mention and it's clear they just wanna hide its existence, this is literally like making an article about text editors and refusing to mention Vim in it because you're an Emacs fan :D For the same reason they probably also don't mention our [LRS wiki](lrs_wiki.md) which they most likely copied (or at very least would be worth a mention as a related resource). This is just a message to their readers that they're gonna blatantly manipulate them and so probably something that should make you go away. It's kind of all funny, sad and depressing that yet another promising thing is becoming a victim to the cancer just in such early stage.
 
-{ To be honest reading through the wiki makes me conjecture it's actually a LRS wiki ripoff that refuses to admit to it :D Now to make it clear: I don't care if someone copies this wiki or if I get credited or anything like that, on the contrary, I explicitly state in many places this is public domain, that I highly encourage copying, making ripoffs and despise any idea of being able to own an intellectual work. The conjecture here is of purely entertaining nature. If anyone associated with permacomputing wiki is reading this, let me know if the similarities are purely coincidental because yes, we are dealing with similar topic, by similar means, having similar value etc. I also understand no one wants to associate his work with mine, though making a small note for historians somewhere can hardly bring anyone any harm. Why I think it's so similar? Some hints are these: wiki created about half a year after this one, "Care for life" cited as their "axiom" vs "Unconditional love of all life" is cited as our axiom (even using the same word "axiom"), whole design looks pretty similar (similar top-level links, css similar to my website, ...), similar articles (like pseudosimplicity vs [pseudominimalism](pseudominimalism.md), [dependency](dependency.md), smallnet vs [smol_internet](smol_internet.md), [games](game.md), [history](history.md), paper computer, [bloat](bloat.md); sure these are general topic we deal with, but the selection...) with similar content in them (e.g. "A dependency refers to another piece of technology" vs "Dependency of a piece of technology is another piece of technology..."). I don't know, it just at the edge of me being able to decide if it's a coincidence or not :P ~drummyfish }
+{ To be honest reading through the wiki makes me conjecture it's actually a LRS wiki ripoff that refuses to admit to it :D Now to make it clear: I don't care if someone copies this wiki or if I get credited or anything like that, on the contrary, I explicitly state in many places this is public domain, that I highly encourage copying, making ripoffs and despise any idea of being able to own an intellectual work. The conjecture here is of purely entertaining nature. If anyone associated with permacomputing wiki is reading this, let me know if the similarities are purely coincidental because yes, we are dealing with similar topic, by similar means, having similar value etc. I also understand no one wants to associate his work with mine, though making a small note for historians somewhere can hardly bring anyone any harm. Why I think it's so similar? Some hints are these: wiki created about half a year after this one, "Care for life" cited as their "axiom" vs "Unconditional love of all life" is cited as our axiom (even using the same word "axiom"), whole design looks pretty similar (similar top-level links, css similar to my website, ...), [same waiver](cc0.md), similar articles (like pseudosimplicity vs [pseudominimalism](pseudominimalism.md), [dependency](dependency.md), smallnet vs [smol_internet](smol_internet.md), [games](game.md), [history](history.md), paper computer, [bloat](bloat.md); sure these are general topic we deal with, but the selection...) with similar content in them (e.g. "A dependency refers to another piece of technology" vs "Dependency of a piece of technology is another piece of technology..."). I don't know, it's just at the edge of me being able to decide if it's a coincidence or not :P ~drummyfish }
 
 ## See Also
 

political_correctness.md

@@ -30,3 +30,5 @@ Political correctness comes with a funny little phenomenon in a form of constant
 Yet another harmfulness of political correctness is by making people too focused on shallow words instead of focusing on real issues. It's not just the harsh punishments for saying certain banned words, even if they wouldn't do much actual damage, it is also the opposite -- inventing new words and offering them as "solutions" to issues. For example it's completely absurd how some very old people who have been outsiders for their whole lives because they're simply weird, shy, too stupid or smart, are suddenly offered a supposed comfort by being told: "you're not weird, you're just neurodivergent!" The guy is like "OH MY GOD, my whole life I have suffered, I thought I was just not good with people, but in fact I was just neurodivergent my whole life -- if only I knew back then!". The amount of stupidity is incredible.
 
 Latest trend on social media seems to be the **pseudo political incorrectness**, i.e. pretending to be politically incorrect by just using for example rude words, which of course aren't politically incorrect by themselves, for the sake of improving one's image. It goes along the lines of "IN TIMES OF POLITICAL CORRECTNESS, this SUPER HERO CELEBRITY IS A COOL NONCONFORMING REBEL who is not afraid of saying the word *fuck* in a youtube video". Of course this is retarded as fuck, political incorrectness isn't at all about being rude, it is only about opposing the gospel of pseudoleftists, you may be politically incorrect without being rude simply by saying "white women are less intelligent than white men but more intelligent than black men", and you may be rude without being politically incorrect, e.g. by saying "we should murder this white guy because he is white so fuck him".
+
+{ LMAO I just almost shat myself, I heard someone in a video say "vertically challenged", with a COMPLETELY SERIOUS FACE -- I was like WTF is that, it was a bit of a headscratcher for me till I looked it up on the net and found it just means someone who is short :'D I fucking can't anymore with this shit. Bruh I wonder what horizontally challenged would mean, is it like someone who's real fat? ~drummyfish }

semiconductor.md

@@ -1,14 +1,14 @@
 # Semiconductor
 
-{ For a physicist there's probably quite a lot of simplification, this is written from the limited point of view of a programmer. ~drummyfish }
+{ For a physicist and electronics guys there's probably quite a lot of simplification, this is written from the limited point of view of a programmer. ~drummyfish }
 
-Semiconductors are materials whose electrical conductivity varies greatly with conditions such as temperature, illumination or their purity, unlike insulators who generally don't conduct electricity very well (have a great [resistivity](resistivity.md)) and conductors who do. Semiconductors, especially [silicon](silicon.md) (Si), are the key component of [digital](digital.md) [electronic](electronic.md) [computers](computer.md) and integrated circuits. Other semiconductors include germanium, selenium or compound ones (composed of multiple elements).
+Semiconductors are materials whose electrical conductivity varies greatly with conditions such as temperature, illumination their purity or applied voltage, unlike insulators who generally don't conduct electricity very well (have a great [resistivity](resistivity.md)) and conductors who do. Semiconductors, especially [silicon](silicon.md) (Si), are the key component of [digital](digital.md) [electronic](electronic.md) [computers](computer.md) and integrated circuits. Other semiconductors include germanium, selenium or compound ones (composed of multiple elements).
 
-Semiconductors are important for computers because they help implement the [binary](binary.md) logic circuits, they can behave like a switch that is either on (1) or off (0). Besides that they can serve e.g. for making measurements (a component whose resistivity depends on its illumination can be used to measure amount of light by measuring the resistivity). Especially important electronic components based on semiconductors are the **[diode](diode.md)** (lets current flow only one way)  and **[transistor](transistor.md)** (a purely electrical "switch" that can be made extremely tiny).
+Semiconductors are important for computers because they help implement the [binary](binary.md) [logic circuits](logic_circuit.md), they can behave like a switch that is either on (1) or off (0). Besides that they can serve e.g. for making measurements (a component whose resistivity depends on its illumination can be used to measure amount of light by measuring the resistivity). Especially important electronic components based on semiconductors are the **[diode](diode.md)** (lets current flow only one way)  and **[transistor](transistor.md)** (a purely electrical "switch" that can be made extremely tiny).
 
-Normally semiconductors don't conduct so well at room temperature (they conduct better at higher temperatures, unlike metals), but their conductivity can be increased by so called **doping** -- introducing small impurities of other elements. By doing this we can get two types of semiconductors:
+Semiconductor elements are those with some special properties related to their atomic structure -- in atoms there are so called *orbitals*, certain discrete "levels" at which electrons "orbit" around the nucleus (distribution of electrons in these orbitals is given by what kind of atom it is, i.e. how many electrons there are in total) and when atoms are together (in a solid), these orbitals create kind of energy [bands](band.md) that electrons can occupy. The outermost energy band that has electrons is called the *valence band*, the band immediately above it (which is normally empty) is called the *conduction band*. Conductor elements are those that don't have the valence band completely filled, so that there is space for electrons to move around and conduct electricity. Insulators on the other hand have the valence band completely filled up, so those electrons can't move easily -- they don't conduct electricity well. Similarly semiconductors in their normal state have the valence band filled, but unlike with insulators the gap between the valence band and conduction band is quite small, so electrons can relatively easily jump from valence band to conduction band and move to conduct electricity -- still semiconductors don't conduct too well at room temperature (they conduct better at higher temperatures, unlike metals), but the small energy gap between the upper bands allows us to increase their conductivity by so called **doping** -- introducing small impurities of other elements. Of course increasing their conductivity in itself wouldn't achieve much as we still have materials that conduct well by themselves (the conductor elements), but as we'll see, doping leads to creating two possible types of semiconductors that when combined give rise to some extremely useful things. The two types of semiconductors are:
 
 - **N type**: By adding e.g. an arsenic atom to a grid of silicon atoms we get an extra free electron because arsenic has 5 outer electrons while silicon has 4. Arsenic binds its 4 electrons with neighboring silicon atoms (with so called covalent bond, sharing pairs of electrons), but will have one unbound electron, which thanks to not being bound can move easily and help conduct electricity (note that when the electron does move away, arsenic will still want to get another electron because it will become positive charged, but the fifth electron is simply always more "loose" thanks to not being bound). In this type of semiconductor we have negative particles, the **electrons**, moving around.
 - **P type**: By similarly adding e.g. an boron atom to a silicon grid, we get a similar situation; boron only has 3 outer electrons, so it will only bind to 3 silicon atoms, leaving one the bond with one silicon incomplete, forming a **hole**. This hole can be seen as a [virtual](virtual.md) positively charged particle, it is simply a lack of electron. An electron can temporarily jump in this hole but will want to move away as boron doesn't want it there. In this type of semiconductor we can imagine the holes moving around (even though physically only electrons are moving, of course).
 
-If we connect a P and N type semiconductors, we get so called **PN junction** which only conducts current one way and is used in diodes and transistors. After putting P and N materials together, at the boundary some electrons from the N type material fill the holes in the P type material which creates a small *depletion region* of certain width. This region is an electric field that's negative on the P side and positive on the N side (because negative electrons have moved from N to P). If we connect the PN junction to a voltage source, with P side to the positive and N side to the negative terminal, we create an opposite electric field which will eliminate the depletion region and allow the flow of current. Connecting the sides the other way around will result in increasing the width of the depletion region and blocking the current flow.
+If we connect a P and N type semiconductors, we get so called **PN junction** which only conducts current one way and is used in [diodes](diode.md) and [transistors](transistor.md). After putting P and N materials together, at the boundary some electrons from the N type material fill the holes in the P type material which creates a small *depletion region* of certain width. This region is an electric field that's negative on the P side and positive on the N side (because negative electrons have moved from N to P). If we connect the PN junction to a voltage source, with P side to the positive and N side to the negative terminal, we create an opposite electric field which will eliminate the depletion region and allow the flow of current. Connecting the sides the other way around will result in increasing the width of the depletion region and blocking the current flow.

sudoku.md

@@ -54,7 +54,25 @@ Humans almost exclusively use logical reasoning techniques to solve sudoku, whic
 - **scanning**: We take a look at some frequently appearing number in the grid and see which columns and rows they intersect which implies they cannot be placed in those columns and rows, possibly revealing the only possible location to place such number.
 - **single remaining candidate**: When there is only one number left to fill in any column, row or subgrid, it is always clear which one it is and can be safely placed.
 - **candidate sets**: A more advanced technique in which we create sets of possible candidate numbers for each square on the grid e.g. by writing tiny numbers in the top corners of the squares. We then apply various reasoning to reduce those sets, i.e. remove candidate numbers, until a single candidate remains for a certain square in which case we can fill in that number with certainty. This will further help us reason about candidates in other squares.
-- **inference chains and cycles**: Very advanced techniques, described e.g. at http://zitowolf.net/sudoku/strategy.html. { TBH no idea what this is. ~drummyfish }
+- **[set](set.md) equivalence properties**: Sudoku squares have some nice properties, it can e.g. easily be proven that some set of squares will always contain the same values as another set of squares -- this is quite easy to use, you just have to remember the rules that hold. See below.
+- **advanced techniques**: There are quite a lot more advanced and expert level techniques like X Wings, Alternating Inference Chains and many more, described e.g. at http://zitowolf.net/sudoku/strategy.html. { TBH no idea what this is. ~drummyfish }
+
+Relatively recently (sometime in 2020s) there was a quite huge discovery/highlight of so called **Phistomefel ring** -- this is an area on the sudoku board that will always contain the same values as another area, which can greatly help in finding solutions (and also in generating sudokus). Consider the following patterns:
+
+```
+ _________________       _________________
+|B B .|. . .|. B B|     |. . .|C C C|. . .|
+|B B .|. . .|. B B|     |. . .|C C C|. . .|
+|._._A|A_A_A|A_._.|     |D_D_D|._._.|D_D_D|
+|. . A|. . .|A . .|     |D D D|. . .|D D D|
+|. . A|. . .|A . .|     |. . .|C C C|. . .|    ...
+|._._A|._._.|A_._.|     |._._.|C_C_C|._._.|
+|. . A|A A A|A . .|     |. . .|. . .|. . .|
+|B B .|. . .|. B B|     |. . .|. . .|. . .|
+|B_B_.|._._.|._B_B|     |._._.|._._.|._._.|
+```
+
+On the left we see the Phistomefel ring -- the set of *A* squares (the ring) will always contain the same values as the set of *B* squares! (Check it on our example sudoku above.) That's it, it's pretty simple, and it's simple to prove too (quickly: consider set *S1* = row3 + row7 + 3x3square4 + 3x3square6, and *S2* = column1 + column2 + column8 + column9; it can be seen that *S1* and *S2* contain the same values; now remove from both sets their intersection -- we have removed the same values from both sets so they still contain the same values, set *S1* is now the Phistomefel ring, *S2* are the corners). A nice thing is that you can find more such relationship just using the simple idea of manipulating sets (the other example, values in sets *C* and *D* also have to be the same etc.).
 
 For computers the traditional 9x9 sudoku is nowadays pretty easy to solve, however solving an NxN sudoku is an [NP complete](np_complete.md) problem, i.e. there most likely doesn't exist a "fast" algorithm for solving a generalized NxN sudoku, even though the common 9x9 variant can still be solved pretty quickly with today's computers by using some kind of "smart" [brute force](brute_force.md), for example [backtracking](backtracking.md) (or another state tree search) which [recursively](recursion.md) tries all possibilities and at any violation of the rules gets one step back to change the previous number. Besides this a computer can of course use all the reasoning techniques that humans use such as creating sets of possible values for each square and reducing those sets until only one possibility stays. The approach of reasoning and brute forcing may also be combined: first apply the former and when stuck fall back to the latter.
 
@@ -64,6 +82,8 @@ For computers the traditional 9x9 sudoku is nowadays pretty easy to solve, howev
 
 Generating sudoku puzzles is non-trivial. There are potentially many different [algorithms](algorithm.md) to do it, here we just foreshadow some common simple approaches.
 
+Note that during generation of the sudoku you may utilize the knowledge of some inherent relationship between squares, e.g. the above mentioned Phistomefel ring.
+
 Firstly we need to have implemented basic code for checking the validity of a grid and also some automatic solver, e.g. based on [backtracking](backtracking.md).
 
 For generating a sudoku we usually start with a completely filled grid and keep removing numbers to leave only a few ones that become the initial clues. For this we have to know how to generate the solved grids. Dumb [brute force](brute_force.md) (i.e. generating completely random grids and testing their validity) won't work here as the probability of finding a valid grid this way is astronomically low (seems around 10^(-56)). What may work is to randomly fill a few squares so that they don't break the rules and then apply our solver to fill in the rest of the squares. Yet a simpler way may be to have a database of a few hand-made grids, then we pick on of them and apply some transformations that keep the validity of the grid which include swapping any two columns, swapping any two rows, [tansposing](transposition.md), flipping the grid, rotating it 90 degrees or swapping any two digits (e.g. swap all 7s with all 9s).

wiki_stats.md

@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
 This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
 
 - number of articles: 563
-- number of commits: 725
+- number of commits: 726
-- total size of all texts in bytes: 3200211
+- total size of all texts in bytes: 3223525
 
 longest articles:
 
@@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ longest articles:
  52K how_to.md
  52K chess.md
  52K less_retarded_society.md
+ 44K faq.md
  40K c.md
- 40K faq.md
  32K 3d_rendering.md
  32K game.md
  32K random_page.md
@@ -24,6 +24,19 @@ longest articles:
 latest changes:
 
 ```
+Date:   Mon Mar 4 23:14:06 2024 +0100
+ascii_art.md
+coc.md
+faq.md
+fun.md
+iq.md
+linux.md
+programming_language.md
+random_page.md
+regex.md
+steganography.md
+wiki_pages.md
+wiki_stats.md
 Date:   Sun Mar 3 17:52:09 2024 +0100
 diogenes.md
 faq.md
@@ -43,20 +56,6 @@ coc.md
 color.md
 compiler_bomb.md
 diogenes.md
-internet.md
-modern.md
-people.md
-progress.md
-race.md
-random_page.md
-reactionary_software.md
-wiki_pages.md
-wiki_stats.md
-Date:   Fri Mar 1 23:35:16 2024 +0100
-altruism.md
-bullshit.md
-charity_sex.md
-culture.md
 ```
 
 most wanted pages:

xxiivv.md

@@ -2,11 +2,11 @@
 
 { Still researching this shit etc. ~drummyfish }
 
-XXIIVV is a [soynet](soynet.md) website and personal [wiki](wiki.md) (similar concept to [our wiki](lrs_wiki.md)) of a Canadian [egoist](egoism.md) [minimalist](minimalism.md)/esoteric programmer/artist/[generalist](generalism.md) David Mondou-Labbe who calls himself "Devine Lu Linvega" ([lmao](lmao.md)) who is a part of a highly cringe artist/programmer group called [Hundred Rabbits](100r.md) (100r) who live on a small ship/boat. David seems to be a normie [SJW](sjw.md) [fascist](fascist.md), proclaiming "aggressivity" on his web (under "/ethics.html" on his site). The site is accessible at http://wiki.xxiivv.com/site/home.html. There are some real good and pretty bad things about it.
+XXIIVV is a [proprietary](proprietary.md) [soynet](soynet.md) website and personal [wiki](wiki.md) (similar concept to [our wiki](lrs_wiki.md)) of a Canadian [egoist](egoism.md) [minimalist](minimalism.md)/esoteric programmer/artist/[generalist](generalism.md) David Mondou-Labbe who calls himself "Devine Lu Linvega" ([lmao](lmao.md)) who is a part of a highly cringe artist/programmer group called [Hundred Rabbits](100r.md) (100r) who live on a small ship/boat. David seems to be a normie [SJW](sjw.md) [fascist](fascist.md), proclaiming "aggressivity" on his web (under "/ethics.html" on his site). The site is accessible at http://wiki.xxiivv.com/site/home.html. There are some real good and pretty bad things about it.
 
 { Holy shit his webring is cringe and toxic as fuck. One huge gay nazi wannabe "artist" circlejerk. It's like a small village worth of the kind of psychopaths who draw cute childish drawings of tiny animals with small hearts and love all around while at the same time advocating live castration of anyone who dislikes them. ~drummyfish }
 
-Firstly let's see the letdowns: **HE LICENSES HIS ART AND SOME OF HIS CODE UNDER [CC-BY-NC-SA](cc_by_nc_sa.md) -- retard alert!**. Honestly he can shove this up his ass. He's a [capitalist](capitalist.md) [open soars](open_source.md) fanboy who oppresses others by trying to monopolizing art by keeping exclusive "commercial intellectual property rights". At least some of his code is [MIT](mit.md), but he also makes fucking [PROPRIETARY](proprietary.md) PAID software (e.g. Verreciel), then he somehow tries to manipulate readers of his website to believe he is "against capitalism" :'D The guy also seems **[egoistic](egoism.md) as fuck**, invents weird hipster names and "personal pronouns" for himself, has some ugly body modifications, wears cringe rabbit costumes, he thinks his art is so good he has to "protect" it with fascist licenses and writes in a cringe pompous/cryptic/poetic style probably in hopes to appear smart while just making it shithard to make sense of his texts -- truly his tech writings are literal torture to read. The only thing he's missing is a fedora. Anyway, that's just a quick sum up of the [cancer](cancer.md) stuff.
+Firstly let's see the letdowns, which greatly prevail: the site is proprietary and **HE LICENSES HIS ART AND SOME OF HIS CODE UNDER [CC-BY-NC-SA](cc_by_nc_sa.md), retard alert!**. Honestly he can shove this up his ass. He's a [capitalist](capitalist.md) [open soars](open_source.md) fanboy who oppresses others by trying to monopolizing art by keeping exclusive "commercial intellectual property rights". At least some of his code is [MIT](mit.md), but he also makes fucking [PROPRIETARY](proprietary.md) PAID software (e.g. Verreciel), then he somehow tries to manipulate readers of his website to believe he is "against capitalism" :'D The guy also seems **[egoistic](egoism.md) as fuck**, invents weird hipster names and "personal pronouns" for himself, has some ugly body modifications, wears cringe rabbit costumes, he thinks his art is so good he has to "protect" it with fascist licenses and writes in a cringe pompous/cryptic/poetic style probably in hopes to appear smart while just making it shithard to make sense of his texts -- truly his tech writings are literal torture to read. The only thing he's missing is a fedora. Anyway, that's just a quick sum up of the [cancer](cancer.md) stuff.
 
 There are also nice things though, a few of them being: