drummyfish/less_retarded_wiki
5
1
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity

Update

Browse source
This commit is contained in:
Miloslav Ciz 2024-07-02 20:46:24 +02:00
parent f5c9f4da18
commit e888160141
37 changed files with 1924 additions and 1800 deletions
Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

6
exercises.md
View file

@ -210,7 +210,8 @@ Bear in mind the main purpose of this quiz is for you to test your understanding
104. What's the error with the following reasoning? *-1 = (-1)^(2/2) = ((-1)^2)^(1/2) = 1^1/2 = 1*.
105. Let's have a [spiral](spiral.md) that's drawn like this: we start with a drawing hand (like e.g. that of clock) that points horizontally to the right and has length *r1*; then the hand turns around a full circle (doesn't matter in which direction), linearly increasing its length to *r2* as it goes. Find the formula for the length of this spiral (this length will be something between the circumference of a circle with radius *r1* and circumference of a circle with radius *r2*).
106. Rounded to whole percents, what is the probability that you'll correctly answer this question?
107. Did you enjoy this quiz?
107. Ronald died and wasn't missed, he was just a capitalist. Every action of that bitch only served to make him rich. Things he built but always sold, patents he would always hold. As he jerked off to his brands, dick got zipped up in his pants. Ron did one last happy dance, had idiot death insurance. Do you know what kind of note this stupid's grave would be bestowed?
108. Did you enjoy this quiz?
### Answers
@ -321,7 +322,8 @@ sin(x) / cos(x) - log2(2) = tg(x) - 1*, so we get *tg(x) >= 1*. So that will hol
104. We can't replace *a^(b/c)* with *(a^b)^(1/c)* if *a* is negative, that equation doesn't generally hold.
105. { I hope this is right :D ~drummyfish } First imagine the graph of a polar coordinate function that says the radius of a plain circle with radius *r* depending on angle: the graph is just constant function (horizontal line) with value *r* going from 0 to *2 * pi*. Integrating this function (from 0 to 2 * pi, here we simply multiply *r* by *2 * pi* as the graph is a rectangle) will give us the formula for the circumference of circle: *2 * pi * r* -- we'll take this largely on intuition but it can be seen that this holds because we're adding constant tiny increments of length from 0 to what we know is the circle circumference (2 * pi * r). Now imagine similar function, just starting at *r1* and linearly increasing to *r2*, i.e. we just have a linear function saying the spiral radius for current angle. Again, we'll integrate this, this time getting (bottom rectangle plus upper right triangle): *2 * pi * r1 + 2 * pi * (r2 - r1) / 2*. Simplifying this we get *pi * (r1 + r2)*, which is hopefully the solution (we see this will be between the circumferences of the smaller and larger circles, also for *r1 = r2* we again get the circumference of plain circle etc.).
106. Lol what, TBH I don't know :D The answer is probably that the question is shit because it's not even clear what it's asking, the definition of probability here is not clear (is it probability of a random "intelligent" man from the street answering it, or giving a completely randomly generated answer to it or what?). 100% might in some cases make sense (firstly we conclude that chance of guessing a number from 0 to 100 is 1/101, but then knowing this will be the answer we conclude we know it for sure, so we switch to 100% and then making further reasonings it stays stable at this value, but this probability assumes we make the reasoning we did, someone else could make a different reasoning maybe leading to other consistent answers). Haven't thought about it deeper yet though. If you know the answer let me know.
107. yes
107. Retard -- read the first letter of each sentence.
108. yes
## Other