Update

wikipedia.md

@@ -8,9 +8,9 @@ WARNING: **DO NOT DONATE TO WIKIPEDIA** as the donations aren't used so much for
 
 { Lol I'm banned at Wikipedia now (UPDATE: blocked globally on all their sites now, can't even log in and defend on my talk page), reason being I expressed unpopular opinions on my personal website OUTSIDE Wikipedia :D UPDATE: one guy messaged me more people started to be banned and invited me to an anti-wikipedia forum here https://wikipediasucks.co/forum/, check it out. Also some more stuff on censorship and bias on Wikipedia: https://www.serendipity.li/cda/censorship_at_wikipedia.htm. ~drummyfish }
 
-Shortly after the project commenced in 2001, Wikipedia used to be a promising project -- it was very similar to how [LRS wiki](lrs_wiki.md) looks right now; it was relatively unbiased, objective, well readable and used plain [HTML](html.md) and [ASCII art](ascii_art.md) (see it as https://nostalgia.wikipedia.org/wiki/HomePage), however over the years it got corrupt and by 2020s it has become a political battleground and kind of a [politically correct](political_correctness.md) [joke](jokes.md). A tragic and dangerous joke at that. It's still useful in many ways but it just hardcore censors facts and even edits direct quotes to push a [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) propaganda. **Do not trust Wikipedia, especially on anything even remotely touching politics**, always check facts elsewhere, e.g. in old paper books, on Metapedia, Infogalactic etc. Also bear in mind the **extreme pseudoleftist bias** in absolutely everything you read on Wikipedia, every single sentence is shaped by evils of [feminism](feminism.md), [gay fascism](lgbt.md), black supremacy and so on -- for example wherever there has a woman been even remotely involved in invention of something, she will automatically be credited with that invention over a man, and anything putting women in negative light (even in fiction) will be obscured; for example the article (May 2024) about the book *The Chrysalids* mentions that the work describes a place where people have *bizarre habits*, it fails to mention these bizarre habits are women putting men in cages, torturing them and abusing them only for reproduction. In reading anything you will be strategically manipulated this way, existence of topic that would be "dangerous" for you to research is strategically hidden from you because Wikipedia is not just an encyclopedia, it is a "safe space" protecting children from "bad information" etc. Thankfully as old Wikipedia is still accessible, you may also browse the older, less censored version, to see how it deranged from a project seeking truth to one abusing its popularity for [propaganda](propaganda.md).
+Shortly after the project commenced in 2001, Wikipedia used to be a promising project -- it was very similar to how [LRS wiki](lrs_wiki.md) looks right now: relatively unbiased, objective, well readable and relying on nothing more than plain [HTML](html.md) and [ASCII art](ascii_art.md) (see it at https://nostalgia.wikipedia.org/wiki/HomePage), but over the years corruption crept in and by 2020s it's left unrecognizable, a political battleground of colossal proportions and a big [politically correct](political_correctness.md) [joke](jokes.md). A tragic and dangerous joke at that. This is not to say it's absolutely useless, but any bit of useful knowledge has to be found in an ocean of crap, Wikipedia just hardcore censors facts and even edits direct quotes to push a [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) propaganda. **Do not trust Wikipedia, especially on anything even remotely touching politics**, always check facts elsewhere, e.g. in old paper [books](books.md), on Metapedia, Infogalactic, old Britannica etc. When reading Wikipedia always maintain awareness of its **extreme pseudoleftist bias** absolutely everywhere, every single sentence is shaped by evils of [feminism](feminism.md), [gay fascism](lgbt.md), black supremacy and so on -- for example wherever there has a woman been even remotely involved in invention of something, she will automatically be credited with that invention over a man, and anything putting women in negative light (even in fiction) will be obscured; for example the article (May 2024) about the book *The Chrysalids* mentions that the work describes a place where people have *bizarre habits*, it fails to mention these bizarre habits are women putting men in cages, torturing them and abusing them only for reproduction. In reading anything you will be strategically misled this way, existence of topics deemed "dangerous" to someone who might happen to be blessed with access to the Internet or topics that wouldn't be good to "research" is strategically hidden from view because Wikipedia is not just an encyclopedia, it is a "safe space" protecting children from "bad information", black people from getting offended etc. Thankfully as old Wikipedia is still accessible, you may also browse the older, slimmer, less up-to-date but less censored version, to see how it deranged from a project seeking truth to one abusing its popularity for [propaganda](propaganda.md).
 
-Wikipedia exists in many (more than 200) versions differing mostly by the [language](language.md) used but also in other aspects; this includes e.g. Simple English Wikipedia or Wikipedia in [Esperanto](esperanto.md). In all versions combined there are over 50 million articles and over 100 million users. English Wikipedia is the largest with over 6 million articles.
+Wikipedia exists in many (more than 200) versions differing mostly by the [language](language.md) used but also in other aspects; this includes e.g. Simple English Wikipedia or Wikipedia in [Esperanto](esperanto.md). All versions combined total over 50 million articles and more than 100 million users. English Wikipedia is the largest with over 6 million articles.
 
 There are also many sister projects of Wikipedia such as [Wikimedia Commons](wm_commons.md) that gathers [free as in freedom](free_culture.md) media for use on Wikipedia, [WikiData](wikidata.md), Wikinews or Wikisources.