@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ We can divide computers based on many attributes, e.g.:
- by continuous or discrete **representation of data**: [digital](digital.md) vs [analog](analog.md)
- by **[hardware](hw.md) technology**: [electronic](electronics.md), [mechanical](mechanical.md), [quantum](quantum.md), biological etc.
- by **purpose**: special purpose vs general purpose, [personal](pc.md), [embedded](embedded.md), [supercomputers](supercomputer.md), gaming computer etc.
- by **purpose**: special purpose vs general purpose, [personal](pc.md), [server](server.md), [embedded](embedded.md), [supercomputers](supercomputer.md), gaming computer etc.
- by **[programmability](programming.md)**: non-programmable, partially or fully programmable
- by the theoretical **[model of computation](model_of_computation.md)** it is based on: [Turing machine](turing_machine.md), [lambda calculus](lambda_calculus.md) etc.
- by **other criteria**: price, reliability etcetc.
@ -10,6 +10,8 @@ Free software is also known as *free as in freedom*, *free as in speech* softwar
[Richard Stallman](rms.md), the inventor of the concept and the term "free software", says free software is about ensuring the freedom of computer users, i.e. people truly owning their tools -- he points out that unless people have complete control over their tools, they don't truly own them and will instead become controlled and abused by the makers (true owners) of those tools, which in [capitalism](capitalism.md) are [corporations](corporation.md). Richard Stallman stressed that **there is no such thing as partially free software** -- it takes only a single line of code to take away the user's freedom and therefore if software is to be free, it has to be free as a whole. This is in direct contrast with [open source](open_source.md) (a term discourages by Stallman himself) which happily tolerates for example [Windows](windows.md) only programs and accepts them as "open source", even though such a program cannot be run without the underlying proprietary code of the platform. It is therefore important to support free software rather than the business spoiled open source.
**Free software is not about [privacy](privacy.md)!** That is a retarded simplification spread by cryptofascists. Free software is about freedom in wide sense, which of course does include the freedom to stay anonymous, but there are many more freedoms which free software stands for, e.g. the freedom of customization of one's tools or the general freedom of art -- being able to utilize or remix someone else's creation for creating something new or better.
**Is free software [communism](communism.md)?** This is a question often debated by [Americans](usa.md) who have a panic phobia of anything resembling ideas of sharing and giving away for free. The answer is: yes and no. No as in it's not [Marxism](marxism.md), the kind of [evil](evil.md) pseudocommunism that plagued the world not a long time long ago -- that was a hugely complex, twisted violent ideology encompassing whole society which furthermore betrayed many basic ideas of equality and so on. Compared to this free software is just a simple idea of not applying intellectual property to software, and this idea may well function under some form of early capitalism. But on the other hand yes, free software is communism in its general form that simply states that sharing is good, it is communism as much e.g. teaching a kid to share toys with its siblings.
@ -6,4 +6,4 @@ The basic principle of free speech says that **if you don't support freedom of s
Some idiots (like that [xkcd](xkcd.md) #1357) say that free speech is only about legality, i.e. about what's merely allowed to be said by the law or what speech the law "protects". Of course, **this is completely wrong** and just reflects this society's obsession with law; true free speech mustn't be limited by anything -- if you're not allowed to say something, it doesn't matter too much what it is that's preventing you, your speech is not free. If for example it is theoretically legal to be politically incorrect and criticize the LGBT gospel but you [de-facto](de_facto.md) can't do it because the LGBT fascist [SJWs](sjw.md) would [cancel](cancel_culture.md) you and maybe even physically lynch you, your speech is not free. It is important to realize **we mustn't tie free speech to legal definition**, i.e. it isn't enough to make speech free only in legal sense -- keep in mind that a [good society](less_retarded_society.md) aims to eliminating law itself. Our goal is to make speech free culturally, i.e. teach people that we should let others speak freely, even those -- and especially those -- who we disagree with.
Despite what the propaganda says there is currently no free speech in our society, the only kind of speech that is allowed is that which has no effect. Illusion of free speech is sustained by letting people speak until they actually start making a change -- once someone's speech leads to e.g. revealing state secrets or historical truths (e.g. about [Holocaust](holocaust.md)) or to destabilizing economy or state, such speech is labeled "harmful" in some way (hate speech, intellectual property violation, revealing of confidential information, instigating crime, defamation etc.), censored and punished.
Despite what the propaganda says **there is no free speech in our society**, the only kind of speech that is allowed is that which has no effect. **Illusion of free speech is sustained by letting people speak until they actually start making a change** -- once someone's speech leads to e.g. revealing state secrets or historical truths (e.g. about [Holocaust](holocaust.md)) or to destabilizing economy or state, such speech is labeled "harmful" in some way (hate speech, intellectual property violation, revealing of confidential information, instigating crime, defamation etc.), censored and punished. Even though nowadays just pure censorship laws are being passed on daily basis, even in times when there are seemingly no specific censorship laws and so it seems that "we have free speech" there always exist generic laws that can be fit to any speech, such as those against "inciting violence", "terrorism", "undermining state interests", "hate speech" or any other fancy issue, which can be used to censor absolutely any speech the government pleases, even if such speech has nothing to do with said causes -- it is enough that some state lawyer can find however unlikely possible indirect link to such cause: this could of course be well seen e.g. in the cases of [Covid](covid.md) flu or Russia-Ukraine war. Even though there were e.g. no specific laws in European countries against supporting Russia immediately after the war started, government immediately started censoring and locking up people who supported Russia on the Internet, based on the above mentioned generic laws. These laws works on the same principle as [backdoor](backdoor.md) in software: they allow complete takeover of the system, but are mostly unused until the right time comes, to give the users a sense of being safe (unlike with software backdoor though the law backdoor isn't usually removed after it has been exploited, people are too stupid to notice this and governments can get away with keeping the laws in place).
Less retarded software (LRS) is a specific kind of [software](software.md) aiming to be a truly good technology maximally benefiting and respecting its users, following the philosophy of extreme [minimalism](minimalism.md) ([Unix philosophy](unix_philosophy.md), [suckless](suckless.md), [KISS](kiss.md)), [anarcho pacifism](anpac.md) and [freedom](free_software.md). The term was invented by [drummyfish](drummyfish.md).
The symbol of LRS is a heart ([love](love.md)), the peace symbol (pacifism, nonviolence) and A in circle ([anarchism](anarchism.md)), in [unicode](unicode.md): ❤☮Ⓐ.
The symbol of LRS is a heart ([love](love.md)), the peace symbol (pacifism, nonviolence) and A in circle ([anarchism](anarchism.md)).
By extension LRS can also stand for *[less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md)*, a kind of ideal society which we aim to achieve with our technology.
Newspeak is a modified form of natural language (e.g. [English](english.md)) twisted for the purpose of thought control of mass population, with [propaganda](propaganda.md) and ideology built in so as to affect thinking of people in a ways desired by the rulers of society. Newspeak was first described in the story of George Orwell's 1949 book called [Nineteen Eighty Four](1984.md) and it is now being implemented in the [real world](irl.md), especially since about the end of 20th century, by the [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md) and capitalists (i.e. [liberals](liberal.md)). Refusing to use newspeak is labeled [thought crime](thought_crime.md), [hate speech](hate_speech.md) or psychological disorder and punished either officially by government or unofficially by society-approved and state-tolerated lynching (so called [cancelling](cancel_culture.md)). So called "[hate speech](hate_speech.md)" is now punishable by law in most first world countries.
Newspeak is a modified form of natural language (e.g. [English](english.md)) twisted for the purpose of thought control of mass population, with [propaganda](propaganda.md) and ideology built in so as to affect thinking of people in a ways desired by the rulers of society. Newspeak was first described in the story of George Orwell's 1949 book called [Nineteen Eighty Four](1984.md) and it is now being implemented in the [real world](irl.md), especially since about the end of 20th century, by the [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md) and capitalists (i.e. [liberals](liberal.md)). Refusing to use newspeak is labeled [thought crime](thought_crime.md), wrongthink, [hate speech](hate_speech.md) or psychological [disorder](disorder.md) and punished either officially by government or unofficially by society-approved and state-tolerated lynching (so called [cancelling](cancel_culture.md)). So called "[hate speech](hate_speech.md)" is now punishable by law in most first world countries.
Real world newspeak is characterized by banning certain keywords, for example so called [slurs](slur.md) such as [nigger](nigger.md), [faggot](faggot.md) or [retard](retard.md), as well as forcing [political correctness](political_correctness.md) ("gender neutral nouns", replacing "man" with "person" etc.), inventing [euphemisms](euphemism.md) for [harmful](harmful.md) and oppressive concepts ([copyright](copyright.md) instead of copyrestriction, [moderation](moderation.md) instead of [censorship](censorship.md) etc.), redefining the meanings of existing terms such as [racism](racism.md) (originally hating people of certain race, now anyone who disagrees with mainstream pseudoleft ideology), [homophobia](homophobia.md) (originally hating gay people, now anyone who disagrees with pseudoleft ideology regarding [LGBT](lgbt.md)), [rape](rape.md) (originally sexual violence, now any action taken by man towards a woman) and inventing completely new terms such as [hate speech](hate_speech.md) and [sanism](sanism.md) serving for eliminating ideological opposition and suppression of [free speech](free_speech.md).
{ [Rape](rape.md) of anyone is bad as is any violence against any living being, that's the only thing that matters. Any thought, desire or perception of any information must however never be considered wrong in itself. ~drummyfish }
Pedophilia is a sexual orientation towards children. Unlike for example pure [homosexuality](gay.md), pedophilia is completely natural and normal, however it is nowadays wrongfully, for political reasons, labeled a "disorder" just as homosexuality used to be. It is the forbidden sexual orientation of our age, even though all healthy people are pedophiles (just don't pretend you've never seen a [jailbait](jailbait.md) you found sexy, people start being sexually attractive exactly as soon as they become able to reproduce), even though one cannot choose this orientation and even though pedophiles don't hurt anyone any more than for example gay people do, they are highly oppressed and tortured. Despite what the propaganda says, a **pedophile is not automatically a rapist** of children any more than a gay man is automatically a rapist of people of the same sex, and watching [child porn](child_porn.md) won't make you want to rape children any more than watching gay porn will make you want to rape people of the same gender. Nevertheless the society, especially the fascists from the [LGBT](lgbt.md) movement who ought to know better than anyone else what it is like to be oppressed only because of private sexual desires, actively hunt pedophiles, [bully](cancel_culture.md) them and lynch them on the internet and in the real life by both civilians and state (I shit you not, in [Murica](usa.md) there are whole police teams of pink haired lesbians who pretend to be little girls on the internet and tease guys so that they can lock them up and get a medal for it). There is a literal witch hunt going on against completely innocent people, just like in the middle ages. Innocent people are tortured, castrated, cancelled, rid of their careers, imprisoned, beaten, rid of their friends and families and pushed to suicide sometimes only for having certain files on their computers (not that any of the above is ever justified to do to anyone, even the worst criminal).
Pedophilia is a sexual orientation towards children. Unlike for example pure [homosexuality](gay.md), pedophilia is completely natural and normal, however it is nowadays wrongfully, for political reasons, labeled a "disorder" just as homosexuality used to be. It is the forbidden, censored and bullied sexual orientation of our age, even though all healthy people are pedophiles (just don't pretend you've never seen a [jailbait](jailbait.md) you found sexy, people start being sexually attractive exactly as soon as they become able to reproduce), even though one cannot choose this orientation and even though pedophiles don't hurt anyone any more than for example gay people do, they are highly oppressed and tortured. Despite what the propaganda says, a **pedophile is not automatically a rapist** of children (a pedophile may choose to never actually even have sex with a child) any more than a gay man is automatically a rapist of people of the same sex, and watching [child porn](child_porn.md) won't make you want to rape children any more than watching gay porn will make you want to rape people of the same gender. Nevertheless the society, especially the fascists from the [LGBT](lgbt.md) movement who ought to know better than anyone else what it is like to be oppressed only because of private sexual desires, actively hunt pedophiles, [bully](cancel_culture.md) them and lynch them on the internet and in the real life by both civilians and state (I shit you not, in [Murica](usa.md) there are whole police teams of pink haired lesbians who pretend to be little girls on the internet and tease guys so that they can lock them up and get a medal for it). There is a literal witch hunt going on against completely innocent people, just like in the middle ages. Innocent people are tortured, castrated, cancelled, rid of their careers, imprisoned, beaten, rid of their friends and families and pushed to suicide sometimes only for having certain files on their computers (not that any of the above is ever justified to do to anyone, even the worst criminal).
The pedophile witch hunt exists because it is a great political tool. It is an arbitrarily invented victimless crime. By the principles of [fear culture](fear_culture.md), it allows to push things such as hard surveillance, similarly to e.g. "war on terror". You're a government or a corporation and want to spy on people chatting? Just make a law requiring mandatory [spyware](spyware.md) in all chat and justify it by "pedophiles" (this is what [EU](eu.md) did). You're against the surveillance law? You must be a pedophile! The witch hunt also allows to immediately cancel anyone uncomfortable. There's a guy who the government doesn't like? Maybe a political competition. Simple, just plant some files on his computer, make up a little story and they're gone.
Pedophiles are often called just *pedos* for short. Opposition of pedophilia is called **[pedophobia](pedophobia.md)**.
Defending pedophilia in itself is enough to be cancelled, however it is the morally right thing to always say the truth. Therefore we mustn't remain silent about this issue.
The fact that they made people believe it is a disorder if your penis can't magically telepathically check a chick's ID and may get erect if she's been born before a date legally established in political region the penis currently resides in shows that at this point an average citizen is more retarded than a braindead chimp.
[Child porn](child_porn.md) is hardocre censored on the internet, it is forbidden to even posses for personal use (!!!) -- even if you don't pay for it, even if you don't show it to anyone, even if you're not redistributing it, even if you're not hurting anyone, even if you don't even watch it, you're a criminal just if a file of an underage PP resides on your harddrive. The anti-pedo craze has gotten so insanely and unbelievably bad that even cartoon pictures of naked children or photos of children in swimsuits (not even talking about non-sexual photos of naked children) are banned basically everywhere on the internet :D WTF. The worst part is that most people comply with such censorship and even support it, it's unbelievable how fucked up the world is -- yes, this definitely makes you want to [kill yourself](suicide.md).
The pedophile witch hunt exists because it is a great political tool. It is an arbitrarily invented (well, maybe not invented but purposefully escalated) victimless crime. By the principles of [fear culture](fear_culture.md), it allows to push things such as hard surveillance and censorship, similarly to e.g. "war on terror". You're a government or a corporation and want to spy on people chatting? Just make a law requiring mandatory [spyware](spyware.md) in all chat and justify it by "pedophiles" (this is what [EU](eu.md) did). You're against the surveillance law? You must be a pedophile! The witch hunt also allows to immediately cancel anyone uncomfortable. There's a guy who the government doesn't like? Maybe a political competition. Simple, just plant some files on his computer, make up a little story and he's gone.
Defending pedophilia in itself is enough to be cancelled or perhaps even imprisoned, however it is the morally right thing to always say the truth. Therefore we mustn't remain silent about this issue.
@ -4,10 +4,17 @@ Productivity cult is one of [modern](modern.md) [capitalist](capitalism.md) reli
The name of the cult itself [says a lot about it](name_is_important.md). While a name such as *efficiency* would probably be better, as efficiency means doing less work with the same result and therefore having more free time, it is not a surprise that capitalism has chosen the word *productivity*, i.e. producing more which means working more, e.g. for the price of free time and mental health.
Productivity obsessed people are idiots, they have desktops with "motivational" wallpapers saying shit like "the word impossible doesn't exist in my dictionary" and when you tell them if it wouldn't be better to rather establish a society where people wouldn't have to work they start screeching "THAT IMPOSSIBLE IT CANT WORK". It's funny that many people who despise the cult of extreme [consooming](consumerism.md) subscribe to the cult of extreme producing.
Productivity obsessed people are idiots, they have desktops with "[motivational](motivation.md)" wallpapers saying shit like "the word impossible doesn't exist in my dictionary" and when you tell them if it wouldn't be better to rather establish a society where people wouldn't have to work they start screeching "THAT IMPOSSIBLE IT CANT WORK". It's funny that many people who despise the cult of extreme [consooming](consumerism.md) subscribe to the cult of extreme producing.
Productivity freaks are often the ones who despise consumers, i.e. brainless machines that consume goods, but somehow don't seem to mind being producers, a similar kind of brainless machine that just stands on the other end of this retarded system.
One of the funniest examples of productivity cult gone too far is so called "[life couching](life_couching.md)" in which the aspiring producer robots hire bullshit cult leaders, so called "life couches", to shout at them to be more productive. At least in the past slaves were aware of being slaves and tried to free themselves. I literally want to [kill myself](suicide.md).
Productivity is such a big deal because **programmers are in fact actually getting exponentially less productive** due to time needed to spend on [bullshit](bullshit.md) nowadays, on overcomplicated buggy [bloat](bloat.md) and billions of frameworks needed to get basic things done -- this has been pointed out by [Jonathan Blow](jonathan_blow.md) in his talk *Preventing the Collapse of Civilization* in which he refers to the video of [Ken Thompson](ken_thompson.md) talking about how he developed the [Unix](unix.md) operating system in **three weeks**.
A considerable number of people are attracted to [suckless](suckless.md) software due to its positive effects on productivity thanks to the elimination of bullshit. These are mostly the kind of above mentioned dumbasses who just try to exploit anything they encounter for [self interest](self_interest.md) without ever aiming for greater good, they don't care about Unix philosophy beyond its effects on increasing their salary. Beware of them, they poison society.
A considerable number of people are attracted to [suckless](suckless.md) software due to its positive effects on productivity thanks to the elimination of bullshit. These are mostly the kind of above mentioned dumbasses who just try to exploit anything they encounter for [self interest](self_interest.md) without ever aiming for greater good, they don't care about Unix philosophy beyond its effects on increasing their salary. Beware of them, they poison society.
Due to mass censorship and brainwashing going on at Wikipedia it is important to look for alternatives that are important especially when researching anything connected to politics. This is a comparison of Wikipedia and some of its alternatives, as of 2023:
|[Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) | CC BY-SA | biggest, mainstream, **EXTREME CENSORSHIP AND PROPAGANDA** |
|[old Wikip.](https://web.archive.org/web/20040605151204/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page)| GFDL | archived old Wikipedia, less censorship |
|[Citizendium](citizendium.md) |PROPRIETARY? (CC BY-NC-SA)| similar to Wikipedia, probably censored as well, faggots have unclear license |
|[Metapedia](metapedia.md) | GFDL | Wikip. fork, no SJW censorship, can't make accounts anymore |
|[Infogalactic](infogalactic.md) | CC BY-SA | Wikip. fork, no SJW censorship, **FOR PROFIT** (you can buy article control lol), can't make accounts |
|[Britannica online](https://www.britannica.com/) | PROPRIETARY | proprietary, bloated, has ads, but nicely written |
|[Britannica 1910](https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/search/?query=Britannica) | public domain | very old but large and completely free, without any modern propaganda |
|[WikiSpooks](wikispooks.md) | CC BY-SA | no SJW censorship, seems only focused on politics |
|[LRS wiki](lrs_wiki.md) | CC0 | best encyclopedia |
|[Conservaedia](conservapedia.md) | PROPRIETARY | American fascist wiki, has basic factual errors |
|[Tor Hidden Wiki](http://zqktlwiuavvvqqt4ybvgvi7tyo4hjl5xgfuvpdf6otjiycgwqbym2qad.onion) | PROPRIETARY | Deepweb wiki on [Tor](tor.md), probably less censored. |
