Update
This commit is contained in:
parent
6240f0edf2
commit
fc95f9c631
11 changed files with 1777 additions and 1759 deletions
6
coc.md
6
coc.md
|
|
@ -2,9 +2,11 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*COC is like a tiny little guillotine of the "[open $ource](open_source.md) revolution".*
|
*COC is like a tiny little guillotine of the "[open $ource](open_source.md) revolution".*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Code of conduct (COC), also *code of coercion* or *code of [censorship](censorship.md)*, is a [shitty](shit.md) invention of [SJW](sjw.md) [fascists](fascism.md) that's put up in projects (e.g. software) and which declares how developers of a specific project must behave socially (typically NOT just within the context of the development but also outside of it), generally pushing toxic woke concepts such as forced inclusivity, exclusivity of people with unapproved political opinions or use of [politically correct](political_correctness.md) language ([newspeak](newspeak.md)). Sometimes a toxic COC hides under a different name such as *social contract* or *mission statement*, though not necessarily. COC is typically placed in the project repository as a `CODE_OF_CONDUCT` file. In practice COCs are used to establish dictatorship and allow things such as kicking people out of development because of their political opinions expressed anywhere, inside or outside the project, and to push political opinions through software projects. COCs are an indication of [tranny software](tranny_software.md). See also http://techrights.org/2019/04/23/code-of-coercion/.
|
Code of conduct (COC), also *code of coercion* or *code of [censorship](censorship.md)*, is a [shitty](shit.md) invention of [SJW](sjw.md) [fascists](fascism.md) that's put up in projects (e.g. software) and which declares how developers of a specific project must behave socially (typically NOT just within the context of the development but also outside of it), generally pushing toxic woke concepts such as forced inclusivity, exclusivity of people with unapproved political opinions or use of [politically correct](political_correctness.md) language ([newspeak](newspeak.md)). Sometimes a toxic COC hides under a different name such as *social contract*, *code of "ethics"* or *mission statement*, though not necessarily. COC is typically placed in the project repository as a `CODE_OF_CONDUCT` file. In practice COCs are used to establish dictatorship and allow things such as kicking people out of development because of their political opinions expressed anywhere, inside or outside the project, and to push political opinions through software projects. COCs are an indication of [tranny software](tranny_software.md). See also http://techrights.org/2019/04/23/code-of-coercion/.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**COCs are extremely controversial and opposed by many**, for example [Alexandre Oliva](alexandre_oliva.md), one of the top people at [Free Software Foundation](fsf.md), the maintainer of [Linux libre](linux_libre.md) who was a serious candidate of the FSF president, himself identifying as "neurodivergent" and being rather [politically correct](political_correctness.md), has expressed extreme criticism ([here](http://www.fsfla.org/ikiwiki/blogs/lxo/2023-09-28-objections-to-binutils-CoC.en.html)) of forcing a COC into GNU Binutils. He criticized not only forceful push of the decision to put a COC (they basically just announced it without asking if people agree with it), but also stated very true observations such as that "[the power of] enforcement and exclusion tends to attract people with authoritarian leanings" and that he himself feels "vulnerable and unsafe" -- again, someone who basically plays by the pseudoleftist rules. Expanding on the guillotine comparison, Oliva knows that the French revolution (and all other revolutions) devoured many of its children, and though he probably feels part of this revolution, he still criticized the guillotine.
|
**COCs are extremely controversial and opposed by many**, for example [Alexandre Oliva](alexandre_oliva.md), one of the top people at [Free Software Foundation](fsf.md), the maintainer of [Linux libre](linux_libre.md) who was a serious candidate of the FSF president, himself identifying as "neurodivergent" and being rather [politically correct](political_correctness.md), has expressed extreme criticism ([here](http://www.fsfla.org/ikiwiki/blogs/lxo/2023-09-28-objections-to-binutils-CoC.en.html)) of forcing a COC into GNU Binutils. He criticized not only forceful push of the decision to put a COC (they basically just announced it without asking if people agree with it), but also stated very true observations such as that "[the power of] enforcement and exclusion tends to attract people with authoritarian leanings" and that he himself feels "vulnerable and unsafe" -- again, someone who basically plays by the pseudoleftist rules. Expanding on the guillotine comparison, Oliva knows that the French revolution (and all other revolutions) devoured many of its children, and though he probably feels part of this revolution, he still criticized the guillotine.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**Code of conduct is a purely political statement**, its purpose is solely to make a statement that the project embraces certain harmful political views, it has no legal value because it states things such as "it is forbidden to harass others", which is something that is already illegal, it doesn't need to be stated. It is as if it stated "it is forbidden to kill black people" -- of course it is forbidden, it is illegal to kill anyone, the statement is here probably means something like "you are not welcome if you show hostility towards black people".
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{ Also here's some site: https://nocodeofconduct.com/, tho it's not shitting on it hard enough. ~drummyfish }
|
{ Also here's some site: https://nocodeofconduct.com/, tho it's not shitting on it hard enough. ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -176,7 +176,8 @@ Bear in mind the main purpose of this quiz is for you to test your understanding
|
||||||
73. A nudist is lying completely horizontally on a beach with his dick pointed up towards the sky when a hot 16 year old jailbait walks by and he gets an erection, the sun is shining under the angle 20 degrees (measured from horizon), his dick is now pointed up completely vertically and casts a shadow that reaches up to his feet, i.e. the shadow (completely horizontal) has a length of 60 cm. How long is his dick (with erection)?
|
73. A nudist is lying completely horizontally on a beach with his dick pointed up towards the sky when a hot 16 year old jailbait walks by and he gets an erection, the sun is shining under the angle 20 degrees (measured from horizon), his dick is now pointed up completely vertically and casts a shadow that reaches up to his feet, i.e. the shadow (completely horizontal) has a length of 60 cm. How long is his dick (with erection)?
|
||||||
74. If your computer resides in a private network that's connected to the Internet through a router that performs network address translation ([NAT](nat.md), common with many ISPs), why you typically cannot host a server that would be publicly accessible from the outside [Internet](internet.md)? I.e. explain how NAT works and say what's preventing outside computers from reaching your server behind it. How can you make your server work even behind NAT?
|
74. If your computer resides in a private network that's connected to the Internet through a router that performs network address translation ([NAT](nat.md), common with many ISPs), why you typically cannot host a server that would be publicly accessible from the outside [Internet](internet.md)? I.e. explain how NAT works and say what's preventing outside computers from reaching your server behind it. How can you make your server work even behind NAT?
|
||||||
75. We know that in C (C99) we can kind of use arrays and pointers "interchangeably", we are taught they are really the same. However show at least one example of when the difference matters, i.e. considering e.g. `int *a;` vs `int a[N];` write some expressions with `a` in it where the distinction will be significant.
|
75. We know that in C (C99) we can kind of use arrays and pointers "interchangeably", we are taught they are really the same. However show at least one example of when the difference matters, i.e. considering e.g. `int *a;` vs `int a[N];` write some expressions with `a` in it where the distinction will be significant.
|
||||||
76. Did you enjoy this quiz?
|
76. Write sed substitution command (the one that starts with `s/`) that will convert Markdown links (format: `[link text](destination)`) to HTML links (format: `<a href="destination">link text</a>`). You probably need [regular expression](regex.md) capture groups for this.
|
||||||
|
77. Did you enjoy this quiz?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Answers
|
### Answers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -255,7 +256,8 @@ Bear in mind the main purpose of this quiz is for you to test your understanding
|
||||||
73. From the right triangle: *dick_legth / shadow_length = tan(20 degrees) => dick_legth = tan(20 degrees) * shadow_length ~= 21.83 cm*.
|
73. From the right triangle: *dick_legth / shadow_length = tan(20 degrees) => dick_legth = tan(20 degrees) * shadow_length ~= 21.83 cm*.
|
||||||
74. Behind NAT you're in a private network, computers inside it have no public addresses (their IP addresses are in the private range and potentially same as addresses of computers in other private networks), only the router has a public IP address that's unique within the Internet, i.e. from Internet's point of view there is only one device connected -- your router. Computers behind this router are invisible, so no one can connect to the server that's behind it. The possibility of you having a two way communication from within this private network with the outside Internet is enabled by the router who communicates for you when you ask for it, i.e. when you (from inside the private network) initiate the connection -- the router then creates the connection for you and talks to the outside world for you (translating your private address to its public address, hence *network address translation*). But no one can initiate communication from the outside, the router wouldn't know to whom he wants to speak. This can be solved e.g. by port forwarding (setting some default computer to which communication from outside will be redirected) or tunneling (keeping a constant connection with some outside proxy server that's listening to requests and resending them).
|
74. Behind NAT you're in a private network, computers inside it have no public addresses (their IP addresses are in the private range and potentially same as addresses of computers in other private networks), only the router has a public IP address that's unique within the Internet, i.e. from Internet's point of view there is only one device connected -- your router. Computers behind this router are invisible, so no one can connect to the server that's behind it. The possibility of you having a two way communication from within this private network with the outside Internet is enabled by the router who communicates for you when you ask for it, i.e. when you (from inside the private network) initiate the connection -- the router then creates the connection for you and talks to the outside world for you (translating your private address to its public address, hence *network address translation*). But no one can initiate communication from the outside, the router wouldn't know to whom he wants to speak. This can be solved e.g. by port forwarding (setting some default computer to which communication from outside will be redirected) or tunneling (keeping a constant connection with some outside proxy server that's listening to requests and resending them).
|
||||||
75. For example `sizeof(a)`: if `a` is a pointer, size of pointer will be returned whereas in case of array the size of the whole array will be returned. Similarly e.g. `&a`: if `a` is a pointer, we'll get a pointer to pointer (generally a different address) whereas in case of array `a` and `&a` gives the same address -- that of the array's first element (though the type will be different).
|
75. For example `sizeof(a)`: if `a` is a pointer, size of pointer will be returned whereas in case of array the size of the whole array will be returned. Similarly e.g. `&a`: if `a` is a pointer, we'll get a pointer to pointer (generally a different address) whereas in case of array `a` and `&a` gives the same address -- that of the array's first element (though the type will be different).
|
||||||
76. yes
|
76. Something like `s/\[\([^]]*\)\](\([^)]*\))/<a href="\2">\1<\/a>/g`.
|
||||||
|
77. yes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Other
|
## Other
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
2
fsf.md
2
fsf.md
|
|
@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
FSF stands for Free Software Foundation, a non-profit organization established by [Richard Stallman](rms.md) with the goal of promoting and supporting [free as in freedom software](free_software.md), software that respects its users' freedom.
|
FSF stands for Free Software Foundation, a non-profit organization established by [Richard Stallman](rms.md) with the goal of promoting and supporting [free as in freedom software](free_software.md), software that respects its users' freedom.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**FSF is [woke](woke.md), STOP SUPPORTING IT**. In 2022 it adopted [code of censorship](coc.md) (https://www.fsf.org/about/voting-member-code-of-ethics) by which it now embraces [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) fascism, it made the decision to let a populist political idea completely unrelated to free software itself ride on the popularity of free software, forcing any supporter of the FSF to embrace a harmful idea that's not related to software freedom at all. It was a calculated decision, exactly the same which [corporations](corporation.md) make nowadays (showing this kind of corruption already made it to FSF) -- embrace a harmful but currently prevailing political views so as to keep majority of supporters who hold those views, as not embracing those views would mean losing those supporters. By this however their will lose a minority of supporters, those who for example value [free speech](free_speech.md) -- [us](lrs.md). For this you must now stop supporting FSF -- yes, even if it means FSF will collapse and corporations will have yet a better position against computer users, this is not your fault, it is the fault of the faggot who made an unrelated political idea a requirement for supporting a completely different idea. In important things we must never make any compromise. Do not give your money to FSF, rather give it to homeless, or start your own free software organization -- one that won't have asterisks and strings attached.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## History
|
## History
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
TODO
|
TODO
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -2,4 +2,6 @@
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
TODO
|
TODO
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Some hexadecimal values that are also [English](english.md) words at the same time and which you may include in your programs for [fun](fun.md) include: `ace`, `add`, `babe`, `bad`, `be`, `bee`, `beef`, `cab`, `cafe`, `dad`, `dead`, `deaf`, `decade`, `facade`, `face`, `fee`, `feed`. You may also utilize digits here (recall the famous number `80085` that looks like `BOOBS`); `0` = `O`, `1` = `I`, `2` = `Z`, `5` = `S`, `6` = `G`, `8` = `B` (already available though).
|
Some **funny hexadecimal values** that are also [English](english.md) words at the same time and which you may include in your programs for the lulz include: `abba`, `ace`, `add`, `babe`, `bad`, `be`, `bee`, `beef`, `cab`, `cafe`, `dad`, `dead`, `deaf`, `decade`, `facade`, `face`, `fee`, `feed`. You may also utilize digits here (see also [leet](leet.md), recall the famous number `80085` that looks like `BOOBS`); `0` = `O`, `1` = `I`/`l`, `2` = `Z`, `4` = `A` (already available though), `5` = `S`, `6` = `G`, `8` = `B` (also already available). Then you get many more words, for example `0b5e55ed`, `0be5e`, `0ff1c1a1`, `101`, `105e`, `1061ca1`, `16100`, `1ad1e5`, `1dea1`, `1e6a1`, `2e1da`, `5a661e5`, `5c1f1`, `50c10b101061ca1`, `60061e`, `600d`, `600fed`, `601d`, `601f`, `60d`, `6a55`, `a1d5`, `a55`, `a5c11`, `a5oc1a1`, `ac1d`, `acce551b1e`, `ad01f`, `b00b1e5`, `b00b5`, `b055`, `b0d1e5`, `b100d`, `b101061ca1`, `b10b`, `b1a5ed`, `b1ade`, `b1e55ed`, `ba115`, `ba5ed`, `bad6e`, `bada55`, `c001`, `c0de`, `c10aca`, `c1a551f1ed`, `ca6ed`, `cab1e`, `caca0`, `d06`, `d15ab1ed`, `d15ea5e`, `d1a106`, `d1ab10`, `ed1b1e`, `f001`, `f00d`, `f1a6`, `f1dd1e`, `f1ea5`, `fa151f1ab1e`, `fa6`, `faece5`, `f06` etc.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
26
jesus.md
26
jesus.md
|
|
@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
|
||||||
# Jesus
|
# Jesus
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Jesus Christ (original name *Yeshua*, meaning *Yahweh saves*, also Jesus of Nazareth, about 4 BC to 33 AD) was a [jewish](jew.md) preacher that's said to have been the messiah, son of [God](god.md), whose life along with alleged miracles he performed is described by the [Bible](bible.md) (specifically its New Testament) and who is the center figure and founder of [Christianity](christianity.md), the world's largest religion; as such he is arguably the most famous of all men in [history](history.md) (probably followed by [Hitler](hitler.md), kind of his opposite). Just one fact proving this claim is that we count our years more or less from his birth. He gained many followers as he lived in times when the coming of messiah was greatly expected. He preached love of God and other people and a kind of newly established universalism: that God has changed his laws a little and would accept all "well behaved" people into his heavenly kingdom (that is not just [jews](jew.md), the chosen people, as was previously the case, established by the God of Old Testament). For having stirred up a social disturbance, a kind of revolution, and for calling himself the messiah he was later crucified, as he himself allegedly predicted -- according to the Bible he sacrificed himself by this act to redeem the sins of all people, was resurrected after death and came up to the heaven to dwell by the God's side. Without subscribing to any mass religion or even having to believe in [God](god.md), our [LRS](lrs.md) is highly aligned with much of the teaching of Jesus Christ, especially that of [non violence](non_violence.md), [love](love.md) of all people (even one's "enemies"), modesty, frugality and so forth.
|
*"Love your enemy, bless those who curse you, do good to those who hate you."* --Jesus
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Jesus Christ (original name *Yeshua*, meaning *Yahweh saves*, also Jesus of Nazareth, about 4 BC to 33 AD) was a [jewish](jew.md) preacher that's said to have been the messiah, son of [God](god.md), whose life along with alleged miracles he performed is described by the [Bible](bible.md) (specifically its New Testament) and who is the center figure and founder of [Christianity](christianity.md), the world's largest religion; as such he is arguably the most famous of all men in [history](history.md) (probably followed by [Hitler](hitler.md), kind of his opposite). Just one fact proving this claim is that we count our years more or less from his birth. He gained many followers as he lived in times when the coming of messiah was greatly expected. Historical facts about him are most likely extremely distorted by now, but traditionally it's said he preached love of God and other people and established a kind of universalism in religion: according to Bible he said that God has changed his laws and would accept all "well behaved" people into his heavenly kingdom -- that is not just [jews](jew.md), the chosen people, as was previously the case, established by the God of Old Testament. For having stirred up a social disturbance, a kind of revolution, and for calling himself the messiah he was later crucified, as he himself allegedly predicted -- according to the Bible he sacrificed himself by this act to redeem the sins of all people, was resurrected after death and came up to the heaven to dwell by the God's side. Along the lines of Martin Buber's quote -- "I don't believe in Jesus, but I believe with him" -- also we appreciate his teaching alone, that is without necessarily subscribing to any mass religion or even having to believe in [God](god.md) (but also without taking away the freedom to do so), our [LRS](lrs.md) is highly aligned with much of the teaching of Jesus, especially that of [non violence](non_violence.md), [love](love.md) of all people (even one's "enemies"), modesty, frugality and so forth.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
..--..
|
..--..
|
||||||
|
|
@ -17,37 +19,41 @@ Jesus Christ (original name *Yeshua*, meaning *Yahweh saves*, also Jesus of Naza
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
*"Artist"'s depiction of our Lord and Savior.*
|
*"Artist"'s depiction of our Lord and Savior.*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
{ Jesus Video by Andreas Eschbach is an amazing fiction book about literally what the title says, one of the best books I've ever read. The movie is shit, read the book. Also the 2006 book *Jesus Dynasty* about historical Jesus is excellent. ~drummyfish }
|
{ Jesus Video by Andreas Eschbach is an amazing fiction book about literally what the title says, one of the best books I've ever read. The movie is shit, read the book. Also the 2006 book *Jesus Dynasty* about historical Jesus is excellent -- the view of historical Jesus here is mostly taken from this book. ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
As perhaps the most influential man in history whose image has been twisted, used and abused over the centuries, we have to nowadays distinguish two separate characters:
|
As perhaps the most influential man in history whose image has been twisted, used and abused over the centuries, we have to nowadays distinguish two separate characters:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Jesus of the Bible**: Jesus as described by the Bible, a book full of centuries worth of distortion, copying mistakes, inaccuracies, censorship and purposeful religious propaganda, further on also distorted just by the long time and cultural forces (e.g. his depictions in art). This kind of Jesus is to a great degree a fictional character, though based on a real man; he is the son of God (some even seeing him as actually the God himself somehow), a man without sin, born from a virgin, who performed countless miracles like healing the blind and even resurrecting dead, who spoke the word of God, was resurrected after death and is now overlooking us from the heaven.
|
- **Jesus of the Bible**: Jesus as described by the Bible, a book full of centuries worth of distortion, copying mistakes, inaccuracies, censorship and purposeful religious propaganda, further on also distorted just by the long time and cultural forces (e.g. his depictions in art). This kind of Jesus is to a great degree a fictional character, though based on a real man; he is the son of God (some even seeing him as actually the God himself somehow), a man without sin, born from a virgin, who performed countless miracles like healing the blind and even resurrecting dead, who spoke the word of God, was resurrected after death and is now overlooking us from the heaven.
|
||||||
- **historical Jesus**: The true man, as seen by [history](history.md), that actually lived and was almost definitely just a mere mortal like any of us, even if others and perhaps even himself may have believed otherwise. Most historians agree Jesus lived (with some minority disagreeing), though of course they reject he would possess any supernatural powers -- these, they say, are things spawned as a legend, a propaganda of mass religion etc. Historical Jesus was different from Biblical Jesus in many ways, many things he says in the Bible were added later on, many of his sayings and actions may have been censored etc.
|
- **historical Jesus**: The true man, as seen by [history](history.md), that actually lived and was almost definitely just a mere mortal like any of us, preaching ideas that are probably quite different from today's traditional Christianity. Most historians agree that Jesus lived (with some minority disagreeing), though of course they reject that he would possess any supernatural powers -- these, they say, are things spawned as a legend, a propaganda of mass religion, added later on etc. Historical Jesus was different from Biblical Jesus in many ways, many things he says in the Bible were only added later, many of his sayings and actions may have been censored etc.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Jesus was [anarchist, pacifist](anpac.md), [communist](communism.md) and explicitly rejected [capitalism](capitalism.md) and all violence** (even in self defense and against those who would "deserve" it), though stupid American capital and military worshippers [tattoo](tattoo.md) shit such as "What would Jesus do?" on their asses, they somehow seem to masterfully apply selective blindness and completely ignore his quotes such as:
|
**Jesus was [anarchist, pacifist](anpac.md), [communist](communism.md) and explicitly rejected [capitalism](capitalism.md) and all violence** (even in self defense and against those who would "deserve" it), though stupid American capital and military worshippers [tattoo](tattoo.md) shit such as "What would Jesus do?" on their asses, they somehow seem to masterfully apply selective blindness and completely ignore his quotes such as:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- *"A camel will go through the eye of a needle before a rich man enters the kingdom of God."* --Jesus
|
- *"A camel will go through the eye of a needle before a rich man enters the kingdom of God."* --Jesus
|
||||||
- *"If someone wants to sue you and take your shirt, give him your coat also."* --Jesus
|
- *"If someone wants to sue you and take your shirt, give him your coat also."* --Jesus
|
||||||
|
- *"I say to you love your enemies, bless those who curse you, do good to who hates you and pray for those who abuse you and persecute you."* --Jesus
|
||||||
|
- *"Whoever has two coats must share with those who have none, and whoever has food is to do the same."* --Jesus, clearly a communist
|
||||||
- *"If someone throws stone at you, throw back at him as well but with bread."* --Jesus
|
- *"If someone throws stone at you, throw back at him as well but with bread."* --Jesus
|
||||||
- *"I tell you: do not resist an evil man. If anyone slaps you on the cheek, turn to him the other cheek also."* --Jesus
|
- *"I tell you: do not resist an evil man. If anyone slaps you on the cheek, turn to him the other cheek also."* --Jesus
|
||||||
- *"Thou shalt not kill."* being directly in ten commandments lol (maybe they don't understand because the language is archaic, one may always find an excuse)
|
- *"Thou shalt not kill."* being directly in ten commandments lol (maybe they don't understand because the language is archaic, one may always find an excuse)
|
||||||
|
- *"If your brother does bad to you, correct him. If he changes, forgive him. Even if he does bad to you seven times a day, forgive him seven times."* --Jesus
|
||||||
- ...
|
- ...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(Americans are stupid idiots who say they love Jesus but rather love to reference Old Testament for their pragmatics life decisions, however the law of Old Testament was explicitly cancelled by Jesus and [updated](update_culture.md) to a new one, based on love and nonviolence rather than violence, punishment and revenge -- this is the whole point of why Jesus came to [Earth](earth.md) in the first place. Old testament is basically the Jewish part of the Bible, obsolete for Christians -- some Christians even completely reject Old testament, e.g. Cathars. It's why the book is called *New Testament*, it means "The New Law". But as it's been said, Americans are stupid.)
|
(Americans are stupid idiots who say they love Jesus but rather love to reference Old Testament for their pragmatics life decisions, however the law of Old Testament was explicitly cancelled by Jesus and [updated](update_culture.md) to a new one, based on love and nonviolence rather than violence, punishment and revenge -- this is the whole point of why Jesus came to [Earth](earth.md) in the first place. Old testament is basically the Jewish part of the Bible, obsolete for Christians -- some Christians even completely reject Old testament, e.g. Cathars. It's why the book is called *New Testament*, it means "The New Law". But as it's been said, Americans are stupid.)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**fun facts about Jesus**:
|
**fun facts about Jesus**:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **He had siblings** (or at least half-siblings), according to both the Bible and historians: brothers James (who after Jesus's death further helped promote his teaching), Joses, Simon, Jude and some sisters.
|
- **He had siblings** (or at least half-siblings), according to both the Bible and historians: brothers James (who after Jesus's death took over his "movement" which is a fact suppressed by mainstream Christianity), Joses, Simon, Jude and some sisters.
|
||||||
- **He was most likely crucified naked**, as was common practice to dishonor the crucified people. Covering his nudity in most depictions may be because of the effort to make it less obvious he was a [jew](jew.md), i.e. that his penis was circumcised.
|
- **He was most likely crucified naked**, as was common practice to dishonor the crucified people. Covering his nudity in most depictions may be because of the effort to make it less obvious he was a [jew](jew.md), i.e. that his penis was circumcised.
|
||||||
- **He is acknowledged by other religions such as the [Islam](islam.md)**, though in these he usually plays some minor role of just some mortal preacher.
|
- **He is acknowledged by other religions such as the [Islam](islam.md)**, though in these he usually plays some minor role of just some mortal preacher. This picture of him is actually more aligned with historical Jesus, it is consistent with the sources (e.g. the lost *Q source*) talking about the original early Christianity that didn't see Jesus as son of God at all.
|
||||||
- We do not sport any anti-white [political correctness](political_correctness.md), however **the traditional depictions of his looks are likely wrong**, he most likely looked much different from the bearded, long-hair white man depictions we see in paintings -- these were likely affected by the Greek ideals of what gods look like. Jesus was a jew, probably of darker skin like all people from the area he lived in, possibly without long hair as some of his followers mention in the Bible that it is inappropriate for a man to have long hair.
|
- We do not sport any anti-white [political correctness](political_correctness.md), however **the traditional depictions of his looks are likely wrong**, he most likely looked much different from the bearded, long-hair white man depictions we see in paintings -- these were likely affected by the Greek ideals of what gods look like. Jesus was a jew, probably of darker skin like all people from the area he lived in, possibly without long hair as some of his followers mention in the Bible that it is inappropriate for a man to have long hair.
|
||||||
- There are some non-canonical gospels (not accepted to Bible) that talk some funny shit about Jesus, e.g. the Infancy Gospel of Thomas talks about how Jesus **as a child killed other children in revenge with his supernatural powers**.
|
- There are some non-canonical gospels (not accepted to Bible) that talk some funny shit about Jesus, e.g. the Infancy Gospel of Thomas talks about how Jesus **as a child killed other children in revenge with his supernatural powers**.
|
||||||
- **His father** is sometimes theorized, by historians, to have been a roman soldier Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera to whom point some of the clues and whose grave has been found in Germany.
|
- **His father** is sometimes theorized, by historians, to have been a roman soldier Tiberius Julius Abdes Pantera to whom point some of the clues and whose grave has been found in Germany.
|
||||||
- Bible gives his **genealogy back to Adam**: Luke (however with some disagreement with Matthew) recounts all ancestors of Jesus back to God (who created Adam) -- Jesus is 77th in row here.
|
- Bible gives his **genealogy back to Adam**: Luke (however with some disagreement with Matthew) recounts all ancestors of Jesus back to God (who created Adam) -- Jesus is 77th in row here.
|
||||||
- His **profession** probably wasn't a "carpenter" in the sense of "working mainly with wood", he was more likely a mason/stonecutter/builder -- the translation in Bible is firstly inaccurate and using wood as a material wasn't that common back then. He was likely a very poor laborer whose life conditions may have been even worse than that of some slaves living in bigger cities.
|
- His **profession** probably wasn't a "carpenter" in the sense of "working mainly with wood", he was more likely a mason/stonecutter/builder -- the translation in Bible is firstly inaccurate and using wood as a material wasn't that common back then. He was likely a very poor laborer whose life conditions may have been even worse than that of some slaves living in bigger cities.
|
||||||
- **He was a [Jew](jew.md)**, he was circumcised, read Jewish scriptures, believed in Jewish God and prophecies, kept to Jewish rituals and traditions -- it's an obvious but often overlooked fact that's been further obscured by the church and Christian culture. There was no other religion than various branches of Judaism back then, Jesus didn't come with the idea of starting a brand new religion, he rather saw himself as a Jewish messiah foretold by the Jewish texts, walking what he believed to be the true way of the religion that was all around back then and which he was part of. Today's Christianity is probably something Jesus wouldn't even embrace -- parallels to this kind of evolution of religions may very well be seen in the world of non-religious ideologies as well, for example see the hostility and differences between [free software](free_software.md) and [open $ource](open_source.md) that emerged just in recent decades: the [founder](rms.md) of free software himself highly disapproves of open source, open source already breaks many of the essential premises and rules of original free software movement, despite it all being very recent and having everything recorded, even in live memories of people -- now imagine this evolution stretched to 2000 years, with no reliable records of the original events, with politics and corruption mixed in and so on.
|
- **He was a [Jew](jew.md)**, he was circumcised, read Jewish scriptures, believed in Jewish God and prophecies, kept to Jewish rituals and traditions -- it's an obvious but often overlooked fact that's been further obscured by the orthodox church and Christian culture established by Paul the Apostle after the death of Jesus -- it was rather Paul who made Christianity what it is today (based purely on his own visions of him), not Jesus (Jesus himself probably didn't even say he was the son of God). There was no other religion than various branches of Judaism in Jesus's culture, Jesus didn't come with the idea of starting a brand new religion, he rather saw himself as a Jewish messiah foretold by the Jewish texts, walking what he believed to be the true way of the religion that was all around back then and which he was part of -- he most likely DID preach universalism, i.e. accepting even non-Jews, but he still separated Jewish and non-Jewish people. Today's Christianity is probably something Jesus wouldn't even embrace -- parallels to this kind of evolution of religions may very well be seen in the world of non-religious ideologies as well, for example see the hostility and differences between [free software](free_software.md) and [open $ource](open_source.md) that emerged just in recent decades: the [founder](rms.md) of free software himself highly disapproves of open source, open source already breaks many of the essential premises and rules of original free software movement, despite it all being very recent and having everything recorded, even in live memories of people -- now imagine this evolution stretched to 2000 years, with no reliable records of the original events, with politics and corruption mixed in and so on.
|
||||||
- **Jesus is supposed to return** and judge the people: this is known as the Second Coming and is hinted on in the Bible, though the details on the date or even the nature of the event are unclear and interpreted differently. Before the second coming **a number of antichrists, or false prophets, are to appear**.
|
- **Jesus is supposed to return** and judge the people: this is known as the Second Coming and is hinted on in the Bible, though the details on the date or even the nature of the event are unclear and interpreted differently. Before the second coming **a number of antichrists, or false prophets, are to appear**.
|
||||||
- There are highly **controversial theories that he had kids** with Mary Magdalene and that his bloodline survives until today (Dan Brown has famously written some books about it).
|
- There are highly **controversial theories that he had kids** with Mary Magdalene and that his bloodline survives until today (Dan Brown has famously written some books about it).
|
||||||
|
- **The gospels of Bible were written anonymously, long after Jesus was dead**. People often think the gospels were written by the apostles in "real time" as they were following Jesus -- that's not the case, we don't know who wrote them, and the earliest (Mark) was written about 70 AD. It is also proven many important things, such as the resurrection of Jesus, were missing in some of them and were added later on.
|
||||||
- ...
|
- ...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Is Jesus God?** Or was he just his son? Or is God and Jesus the same? What about the "holy spirit"? This seems to not actually be easy to answer, different people will tell you different things, some point to passages in Bible where they believe he literally says he is the God, others say the translation is not precise or even that it doesn't matter (anyone can really say he's a God) etcetc. The whole thing around holy trinity and so on is not easy to resolve objectively (some Muslims have even been entertained by this fact that Christians can't even get to agree on who their god is), but basically most Christians pray to Jesus, call him "our Lord and Savior" and generally treat him as if he was the same as God, so we can really see him that way.
|
**Is Jesus God?** Or was he just his son? Or is God and Jesus the same? What about the "holy spirit"? This seems to not actually be easy to answer, different people will tell you different things, some point to passages in Bible where they believe he literally says he is the God, others say the translation is not precise or even that it doesn't matter (anyone can really say he's a God) etcetc. The whole thing around holy trinity and so on is not easy to resolve objectively (some Muslims have even been entertained by this fact that Christians can't even get to agree on who their god is), but basically most Christians pray to Jesus, call him "our Lord and Savior" and generally treat him as if he was the same as God, so we can really see him that way.
|
||||||
|
|
@ -72,11 +78,13 @@ As he arrived to Jerusalem, he was very famous and seen as a messiah by many, an
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Another important moment is **the last supper**, the final meal of Jesus which he shared with his apostles, that took place on 3rd April. After this one of the apostles, Judas, betrayed Jesus (which Jesus foretold) in Mount of Olives by leading the temple police to Jesus; Judas did this for the reward of 30 silver coins, later he regretted it and committed [suicide](suicide.md).
|
Another important moment is **the last supper**, the final meal of Jesus which he shared with his apostles, that took place on 3rd April. After this one of the apostles, Judas, betrayed Jesus (which Jesus foretold) in Mount of Olives by leading the temple police to Jesus; Judas did this for the reward of 30 silver coins, later he regretted it and committed [suicide](suicide.md).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The Jews have taken Jesus to Pontius Pilate, Roman governor, to be put on trial for the various offenses he committed. According to Bible Pilate didn't find Jesus guilty but as the Jews pressured, he gave them a choice: he said he would either release Jesus or Barabbas, a murderer. The Jews chose Barabbas to be released, condemning Jesus to be crucified. Before this Jesus was also sent to Herod Antipas, the ruler of Galilee. Bible paints a picture in which he isn't found guilty in the trials but the pressure of Jewish people leads to his execution -- this was again challenged by historians as an attempt at blaming the Jews for the death of Jesus and for showing Romans in favorable light, to strictly separate Christianity from Judaism; this seems to be inconsistent with historical facts such as that Pontius Pilate was known for his cruelty and letting people be executed whenever he could.
|
The Jews have taken Jesus to Pontius Pilate, Roman governor, to be put on trial for the various offenses he committed. According to Bible Pilate didn't find Jesus guilty but as the Jews pressured, he gave them a choice: he said he would either release Jesus or Barabbas, a murderer. The Jews chose Barabbas to be released, condemning Jesus to be crucified. Before this Jesus was also sent to Herod Antipas, the ruler of Galilee. Bible paints a picture in which he isn't found guilty in the trials but the pressure of Jewish people leads to his execution -- this was again challenged by historians as an attempt at blaming the Jews for the death of Jesus and for showing Romans in favorable light, to strictly separate Christianity from Judaism; this seems to be inconsistent with historical facts such as that Pontius Pilate was known for his cruelty and letting people be executed whenever he could, and with Jesus actually having many supporters among Jews.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The **crucifixion** of Jesus is also seen as a true historical event now, which took place most likely in 30 or 33 AD, on April 4th, according to some^([not important who]) it happened from 9 AM to 3 PM (when he died). Before death he was tortured, whipped and was put on a crown of thorns (to mock that he was supposed to be the "king of Jews"). He was led to a hill in Golgotha, just outside Jerusalem, to where he had to carry his own cross, onto which he was then nailed and left to die, alongside two other criminals. According to some gospels he said various things on the cross, for example "father, forgive them for they don't know what they do", "father, why have you forsaken me?" and finally "it is finished".
|
The **crucifixion** of Jesus is also seen as a true historical event now, which took place most likely in 30 or 33 AD, on April 4th, according to some^([not important who]) it happened from 9 AM to 3 PM (when he died). Before death he was tortured, whipped and was put on a crown of thorns (to mock that he was supposed to be the "king of Jews"). He was led to a hill in Golgotha, just outside Jerusalem, to where he had to carry his own cross, onto which he was then nailed and left to die, alongside two other criminals. According to some gospels he said various things on the cross, for example "father, forgive them for they don't know what they do", "father, why have you forsaken me?" and finally "it is finished". Historically speaking he probably didn't believe to be the son of God and didn't think he would be resurrected (a myth created later on), he just thought he was a prophet, he may have believed he would be saved from death by God in last moment, hence the words about God "forsaking him".
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
His body was then buried in a tomb (which by historians is seen as unusual) of one of his followers. According to Bible, 3 days later he was **resurrected** (his tomb was found empty) and left the tomb, he went and visited some of his followers, and then, 40 days after the resurrection, ascended up to the heaven. Historically this is of course denied and there is a lot of mess around the resurrection, for example the gospels themselves disagree greatly on who and when discovered the empty tomb, and the original version of oldest one (Mark) doesn't even say ANYTHING about resurrection at all! It literally ends with the tomb being discovered empty, which doesn't imply anything about resurrection, i.e. the oldest source apparently doesn't bother to mention probably the greatest and most important part of the today's version of the story of Jesus; it is proven that a new ending with the resurrection was added to Mark later on, so it's all probably just made up propaganda. Besides this there are also "alternative" theories that Jesus for example didn't actually die on the cross, that he was just in coma and woke up in the tomb but these also seem to have very little support.
|
His body was then buried in a tomb (which by historians is seen as unusual) of one of his followers -- this burial was probably just quick and temporary because celebration of Passover were near. According to Bible, 3 days later he was **resurrected** (his tomb was found empty) and left the tomb, he went and visited some of his followers, and then, 40 days after the resurrection, ascended up to the heaven. Historically this is of course denied and there is a lot of mess around the resurrection, for example the gospels themselves disagree greatly on who and when discovered the empty tomb, and the original version of oldest one (Mark) doesn't even say ANYTHING about resurrection at all! It literally ends with the tomb being discovered empty, which doesn't imply anything about resurrection -- it might just have been that someone took the body from the temporary tomb and buried it properly. I.e. the oldest source apparently doesn't bother to mention probably the greatest and most important part of the today's version of the story of Jesus; it is proven that a new ending with the resurrection was added to Mark later on, so it's all probably just made up propaganda. Besides this there are also "alternative" theories that Jesus for example didn't actually die on the cross, that he was just in coma and woke up in the tomb but these also seem to have very little support.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
After his death his brother James probably took over leading the movement, but this branch of original "jewish Christianity" was to be suppressed by the interpretation of Paul the apostle who actually never met Jesus, but who got a "vision" of him and created the kind of universal religion we know today, he came up with the idea that Jesus was son of God, that whole Torah (Old Testament) is obsolete etcetc.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## See Also
|
## See Also
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
1
kiss.md
1
kiss.md
|
|
@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ Apparently the term *KISS* originated in the US Army plane engineering: the plan
|
||||||
- Using [markdown](markdown.md) for creating documents, as opposed to using office programs such as [Libreoffice](libreoffice.md).
|
- Using [markdown](markdown.md) for creating documents, as opposed to using office programs such as [Libreoffice](libreoffice.md).
|
||||||
- Using a trivial [shell](shell.md) script for compiling your programs rather than a complex build system such as [CMake](cmake.md).
|
- Using a trivial [shell](shell.md) script for compiling your programs rather than a complex build system such as [CMake](cmake.md).
|
||||||
- Using [ASCII art](ascii_art.md) instead of bitmap images.
|
- Using [ASCII art](ascii_art.md) instead of bitmap images.
|
||||||
|
- [Beatboxing](beatbox.md) to produce a back track for rap songs, as opposed to using (or even paying for) some kind of music software.
|
||||||
- In the world of [coffee](coffee.md) so called *Turkish coffee* without any milk and sugar is probably the most KISS option, you just put coffee ground in a mug and pour hot water on it. Compare this to Espresso with milk and sugar which needs a quite complex and expensive machine. { Yeah, I drink the most KISS coffee, though sometimes I also use French press -- that one is still quite simple. ~drummyfish }
|
- In the world of [coffee](coffee.md) so called *Turkish coffee* without any milk and sugar is probably the most KISS option, you just put coffee ground in a mug and pour hot water on it. Compare this to Espresso with milk and sugar which needs a quite complex and expensive machine. { Yeah, I drink the most KISS coffee, though sometimes I also use French press -- that one is still quite simple. ~drummyfish }
|
||||||
- ...
|
- ...
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
|
||||||
# Name Is Important
|
# Name Is Important
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Name of a philosophy, project, movement, group, [ideology](ideology.md) etc. plays a more significant role than a common man believes. A naive view is that name is just an arbitrary identifier whose value lies at most being "catchy" and "easily remembered" (see also [marketing](marketing.md)), a common man will rather believe promise of politician than the name of his party which he will disregard just as a "bunch of unimportant words"; however name is much more than a mere string of letters, it is the single most stable defining feature of an entity; everything else, all the books and knowledge associated with it may be distorted by history, but the name will always stay the same and will hold a scrutiny over all actions of the entity, it will always be a permanent reminder to every follower of what he is trying to achieve. But what if the name of the movement changes? Then it will be by definition a new, different movement, and everyone will have to decide if he wants to abandon the old movement to join the new. The name very often points towards the one true goal.
|
Name of a philosophy, project, movement, group, [ideology](ideology.md) etc. plays a more significant role than a common man believes. A naive view is that name is just an arbitrary identifier whose value lies at most being "catchy" and "easily remembered" (see also [marketing](marketing.md)), a common man will rather believe promise of politician than the name of his party which he will disregard just as a "bunch of unimportant words"; however name is much more than a mere string of letters, it is the single most stable defining feature of an entity; everything else, all the books and knowledge associated with it may be distorted by [history](history.md), but the name will always stay the same and will hold a scrutiny over all actions of the entity, it will always be a permanent reminder to every follower of what he is trying to achieve. But what if the name of the movement changes? Then it will be by definition a new, different movement, and everyone will have to decide if he wants to abandon the old movement to join the new. The name very often points towards the one true goal.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
HOWEVER, here also comes a word of **warning**: firstly language itself (i.e. meanings of all words that exist in it) changes, and also although the power of the name is great, it is not infinite, the discussed stress of the importance of name should just remind us that the force of the name is greater than one might expect, but may will still be broken if stronger forces are at play -- there have been many cases of **name abuse** in history, notably e.g. by [Nazism](nazi.md) whose name stands for "national socialism" but whose actions were completely antisocialist, or so called ["Anarcho" capitalism](ancap.md) which abuses the name *[anarchism](anarchism.md)* despite being completely antianarchist. The moral of the story here is that we should put a great effort in choosing a name, but we shouldn't think we'll be safe as long as we do -- we will probably never be safe from the fuzziness of language and its potential to be abused, but we should try to do our best.
|
HOWEVER, it may also not be completely true -- few things in Universe hold absolutely. Hear this **warning**: firstly [human language](human_language.md) itself (i.e. meanings of all words that exist in it) changes, the process is slow but in several hundred years this effect becomes significant. Secondly although the power of name is great, it is not infinite, the discussed stress of the importance of name should just remind us that the force of the name is greater than one might expect, but may still be broken if stronger forces are at play -- there have been many cases of **name abuse** in history, notably e.g. by [Nazism](nazi.md) whose name stands for "national socialism" but whose actions were completely antisocialist, or so called ["Anarcho" capitalism](ancap.md) which abuses the name *[anarchism](anarchism.md)* despite being completely antianarchist. The moral of the story here is that we should put a great effort in choosing a name, but we shouldn't think we'll be safe as long as we do -- we will probably never be safe from the fuzziness of language and its potential to be abused, but we should try to do our best.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We have to keep in mind two things:
|
We have to keep in mind two things:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -13,4 +13,5 @@ This is a place for sharing some practical programming tips.
|
||||||
- During development turn off optimization flags for faster compiling and turn on verbosity and various checks, e.g. `-Werror -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic` for [C](c.md).
|
- During development turn off optimization flags for faster compiling and turn on verbosity and various checks, e.g. `-Werror -Wall -Wextra -Wpedantic` for [C](c.md).
|
||||||
- By [Unix philosophy](unix_philosophy.md) **don't be afraid to throw away your code and start over and better** -- next time you'll most likely write the same program a lot better and if you're a Unix programmer, your programs are small, possible to be reimplemented quicky. This has even been generalized into a wisdom that says "plan to throw away one", i.e. when approaching a new issue, you quite frequently start writing a program you know you will throw away when it's finished, just to start over and better; the first program just serves to help you understand the true essence of the problem and foresee the real problems you will face.
|
- By [Unix philosophy](unix_philosophy.md) **don't be afraid to throw away your code and start over and better** -- next time you'll most likely write the same program a lot better and if you're a Unix programmer, your programs are small, possible to be reimplemented quicky. This has even been generalized into a wisdom that says "plan to throw away one", i.e. when approaching a new issue, you quite frequently start writing a program you know you will throw away when it's finished, just to start over and better; the first program just serves to help you understand the true essence of the problem and foresee the real problems you will face.
|
||||||
- **Go out!** This is related to the other point -- you shouldn't just sit at the computer when programming, get up and go for a walk, do something else, take a shower, go swim, do something in the garden, repair some stuff or something like that. Fresh air and sunlight helps the brain, it makes you feel better and it's been shown that walking helps activate some important brain centers, many people [actually](ackchyually.md) say they have to walk when thinking hard { Can confirm. ~drummyfish } Changing your environment and getting out of the current focus on the letter on the screen can kick off some real great idea, seeing seemingly unrelated things in nature can spark some inspiration. If you're stuck, take a day off, just sleeping and approaching the problem fresh does miracles. This really does help. It may help to **carry around a blog for taking notes** so that you don't have to stress about forgetting the ideas -- prefer paper blog, leave all electronics at home.
|
- **Go out!** This is related to the other point -- you shouldn't just sit at the computer when programming, get up and go for a walk, do something else, take a shower, go swim, do something in the garden, repair some stuff or something like that. Fresh air and sunlight helps the brain, it makes you feel better and it's been shown that walking helps activate some important brain centers, many people [actually](ackchyually.md) say they have to walk when thinking hard { Can confirm. ~drummyfish } Changing your environment and getting out of the current focus on the letter on the screen can kick off some real great idea, seeing seemingly unrelated things in nature can spark some inspiration. If you're stuck, take a day off, just sleeping and approaching the problem fresh does miracles. This really does help. It may help to **carry around a blog for taking notes** so that you don't have to stress about forgetting the ideas -- prefer paper blog, leave all electronics at home.
|
||||||
- TODO: moar
|
- Insert funny [hexadecimal](hexadecimal.md) constant in your program such as `0xED1B1EFAECE5`.
|
||||||
|
- TODO: moar
|
||||||
3428
random_page.md
3428
random_page.md
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load diff
File diff suppressed because one or more lines are too long
|
|
@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
|
||||||
This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
|
This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- number of articles: 579
|
- number of articles: 579
|
||||||
- number of commits: 797
|
- number of commits: 798
|
||||||
- total size of all texts in bytes: 3768868
|
- total size of all texts in bytes: 3771245
|
||||||
- total number of lines of article texts: 28941
|
- total number of lines of article texts: 28949
|
||||||
- number of script lines: 262
|
- number of script lines: 262
|
||||||
- occurences of the word "person": 8
|
- occurences of the word "person": 8
|
||||||
- occurences of the word "nigger": 74
|
- occurences of the word "nigger": 74
|
||||||
|
|
@ -35,37 +35,37 @@ longest articles:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
top 50 5+ letter words:
|
top 50 5+ letter words:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- which (2155)
|
- which (2158)
|
||||||
- there (1636)
|
- there (1637)
|
||||||
- people (1424)
|
- people (1425)
|
||||||
- other (1180)
|
- other (1181)
|
||||||
- example (1161)
|
- example (1164)
|
||||||
- software (1062)
|
- software (1062)
|
||||||
- number (1034)
|
- number (1034)
|
||||||
- about (979)
|
- about (980)
|
||||||
- program (858)
|
- program (858)
|
||||||
- their (808)
|
- their (808)
|
||||||
- because (768)
|
- because (769)
|
||||||
- would (756)
|
- would (757)
|
||||||
- called (746)
|
- called (746)
|
||||||
- language (734)
|
- language (734)
|
||||||
- computer (729)
|
- computer (729)
|
||||||
- being (710)
|
- being (710)
|
||||||
- simple (696)
|
- simple (696)
|
||||||
- things (691)
|
- things (693)
|
||||||
- numbers (688)
|
- numbers (688)
|
||||||
- something (663)
|
- something (665)
|
||||||
- without (655)
|
- without (655)
|
||||||
- programming (645)
|
- programming (645)
|
||||||
- function (643)
|
- function (643)
|
||||||
- these (607)
|
- these (608)
|
||||||
- however (604)
|
- however (604)
|
||||||
- different (603)
|
- different (603)
|
||||||
- world (571)
|
- world (571)
|
||||||
- system (555)
|
- system (555)
|
||||||
- should (544)
|
- should (544)
|
||||||
- games (539)
|
- games (539)
|
||||||
- doesn (536)
|
- doesn (537)
|
||||||
- point (531)
|
- point (531)
|
||||||
- society (530)
|
- society (530)
|
||||||
- though (504)
|
- though (504)
|
||||||
|
|
@ -83,12 +83,23 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
|
||||||
- really (424)
|
- really (424)
|
||||||
- computers (418)
|
- computers (418)
|
||||||
- extremely (412)
|
- extremely (412)
|
||||||
- always (410)
|
- always (411)
|
||||||
- first (409)
|
- first (409)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
latest changes:
|
latest changes:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
Date: Sat May 11 20:41:35 2024 +0200
|
||||||
|
ascii_art.md
|
||||||
|
disease.md
|
||||||
|
exercises.md
|
||||||
|
myths.md
|
||||||
|
random_page.md
|
||||||
|
trom.md
|
||||||
|
wiki_pages.md
|
||||||
|
wiki_stats.md
|
||||||
|
wikipedia.md
|
||||||
|
work.md
|
||||||
Date: Wed May 8 22:32:14 2024 +0200
|
Date: Wed May 8 22:32:14 2024 +0200
|
||||||
21st_century.md
|
21st_century.md
|
||||||
acronym.md
|
acronym.md
|
||||||
|
|
@ -111,17 +122,6 @@ Date: Tue May 7 21:18:26 2024 +0200
|
||||||
communism.md
|
communism.md
|
||||||
debugging.md
|
debugging.md
|
||||||
exercises.md
|
exercises.md
|
||||||
gopher.md
|
|
||||||
hero_culture.md
|
|
||||||
military.md
|
|
||||||
race.md
|
|
||||||
random_page.md
|
|
||||||
wiki_pages.md
|
|
||||||
wiki_stats.md
|
|
||||||
wiki_style.md
|
|
||||||
woman.md
|
|
||||||
Date: Mon May 6 21:37:53 2024 +0200
|
|
||||||
chess.md
|
|
||||||
```
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
most wanted pages:
|
most wanted pages:
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue