Update

atheism.md

@@ -25,4 +25,6 @@ checkmate QED
 
 ## See Also
 
-- [stupidity](stupidity.md)
+- [stupidity](stupidity.md)
+- [rationalization](rationalization.md)
+- [soyence](soyence.md)

duke3d.md

@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@ The game uses [256](256.md) [colors](color.md) and [palettes](palette.md).
 
 - [Doom](doom.md)
 - [Anarch](anarch.md)
+- [Quake](quake.md)
+- [Wolf3D](wolf3d.md)
 - [Jedi engine](jedi_engine.md)
 - [Dick Suckem](dick_suckem.md)
 - [They Live](they_live.md)

exercises.md

@@ -664,7 +664,7 @@ sin(x) / cos(x) - log2(2) = tg(x) - 1*, so we get *tg(x) >= 1*. So that will hol
 123. Constant bitrate means a given time unit of the video will always be encoded with (at least approximately) the same number of [bits](bit.md). One second of the video will therefore take the same size no matter how complex or simple the encoded scene is. Advantages are for example being able to estimate size of any video just from its duration alone, easier seeking and rewinding to a random position, or that during streaming over network there will be a constant number of bits transferred per second, which is very predictable and good for many protocols. Disadvantage may be that sometimes space is wasted (we encode a simple scene with more bits than necessary) and that quality of the video won't be constant (scenes for which bits don't suffice will have to have their quality lowered).
 124. Draw the shit on paper: draw a ball (Earth) and a point above it (ISS), then draw a tangent line from the point to the ball. Then draw a line from the ball center to the ISS and from the ball center to where the tangent line touches that ball (the horizon). Obviously there's a right angle at the tangent line touch point, so we have a right triangle. One side is the Earth radius and the longest side is the radius plus the orbit height. From this we compute the remaining side as *sqrt((6378 + 400)^2 - 6378^2)*, which gives us approx. 2293 km.
 125. 24 bit RGB is easy: 00ff00. For 565 we want a 16 bit value whose upper and lower 5 bits are zero, with the middle bits being ones, i.e. 0000011111100000 in binary, which is 07e0 in hexadecimal. Similarly for 332 we get 1c.
-126. Apparently the expected answer is this: just jump out of the blender. How? If you're so small, you can jump much higher, just like bugs can, as physics on such a small scale work differently (which is why for example elephants can't jump at all while a cat can jump to a height many times its own height).
+126. Apparently the expected answer is this: just jump out of the blender. How? If you're so small, you can jump much higher, just like bugs can, as physics on such a small scale functions differently (which is why for example elephants can't jump at all while a cat can jump to a height many times its own height).
 127. yes
 
 ## Other

faq.md

@@ -341,6 +341,10 @@ Not a question but good point, I see what you are saying: some people talk too m
 
 Only idiots will, those are people who are beyond saving anyway, so in reality I'm just saving them time. For me it works like this (it should also work like this for you, else you're faulty): if I read somewhere a thing *X* is retarded, along with a good explanation as to why, and I know I'm doing *X*, I really say to myself "hmm, I'd like to be less retarded, I should probably stop doing that", and then I try -- that's how I [unretard](unretard.md) myself more and more. That's how it works for people who have a good, essentially non-retarded mindset (even if they still do many retarded things; remember, only [God](god.md) can be perfect). Truth is a truth, if something is stupid it's stated to be stupid, being diplomatic is harmful and idiotic.
 
+### Do you believe in god?
+
+I don't know, I ask myself the same. The issue lies in what the question really means, I don't know how to answer because I don't know what's being asked. I am definitely not a fedora [atheist](atheism.md), and I just as well don't subscribe to any "religion as a package" (though I was baptized when I was very little). I am absolutely positive there are things beyond our comprehension and it would be foolish to believe humans are special, unique, most intelligent or somehow central to the Universe, I see it as a fact there is something above, more powerful and intelligent (in its own way), I am just unsure about the nature of such a force (Does it "know" or "care" about us? What are its "goals"? Is it a single entity or multiple ones? Is it even "in" our Universe or somehow "above" it? Is it just an extremely powerful computer still abiding by the laws of our physics or is capable of performing literal miracles such as deciding undecidable problems thanks to existing above our Universe? Can we really even think about it in terms of [our language](human_language.md) which is only ever capable of describing concepts that are familiar to us?). The religion (if we could call it so) I found resonated best with me was [Buddhism](buddhism.md), but I never studied it or otherwise "immersed" myself in it, partly because I am lazy and partly because I encountered some obstacles (I find it hard to meditate or believe in reincarnation for example). Like always, I prefer to just absorb many ideas from different sources and form my own unique way of faith. What I believe in can probably be best understood from this wiki: for example I somehow see [life](life.md) as most the most sacred thing in the Universe and that's what all my [morals](morality.md) are derived from.
+
 ### Do you get death threats?
 
 Yes.

interesting.md

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ What following a "constantly [work in progress](wip.md)" list of subjectively se
 - **[Language](human_language.md) and translations**: translation errors are a rich rabbit hole, revealing not only bloopers but weird differences and features of languages themselves. { Start for example here https://allthetropes.org/wiki/Lost_in_Translation. ~drummyfish }
 - **Deep sea, Antarctica and other unexplored parts of the world**.
 - **Old [books](books.md) and drawings**, first-hand records of [history](history.md) from before photography. There are no photographs from medieval times, but there are paintings, which are sometimes quite realistic and the next best thing to a photograph. First hand witness accounts of historical events ,such as the Krakatoa explosion, famines, black death etc., are indeed very captivating.
-- **Space and distant history**: just viewing HD photos from Mars can fill us with awe for hours, and then there are videos of [Earth](earth.md) from the ISS (it's surprising how many features can be seen from it, e.g. solar plants reflecting the Sun), videos and photos from the [Moon](moon.md), photos of distant planets (Pluto, ...) etc. Then there are exoplanets, Universe simulators, supernovas, strange formations in distant universe. Another cool pastime is looking into discoveries about distant past such as the Big Bang, formation of the Moon or the Chicxulub impact (also looking up other big craters on Earth), AND possibly researching accurate predictions of the far future (collision of Andromeda galaxy with our Milky Way etc.).
+- **[Space](universe.md), distant past and future**: just viewing HD photos from Mars can fill us with awe for hours, and then there are videos of [Earth](earth.md) from the ISS (it's surprising how many features can be seen from it, e.g. solar plants reflecting the Sun), videos and photos from the [Moon](moon.md), photos of distant planets (Pluto, ...) etc. Then there are exoplanets, Universe simulators, supernovas, strange formations in distant universe. Another cool pastime is looking into discoveries about distant past such as the Big Bang, formation of the Moon or the Chicxulub impact (also looking up other big craters on Earth), AND possibly researching accurate predictions of the far future (collision of Andromeda galaxy with our Milky Way etc.).
 - **Historical [Jesus](jesus.md)** (and other similar historical figures such as Muhammad, Moses, Homer, ...) -- new archeological discoveries are being made and it's fascinating how much can be deduced from it when connected to other source. We are still getting closer to the true image of perhaps the most famous man in history.
 - ...
 

less_retarded_society.md

@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@ After all less retarded society can be described very simply. We now have the te
 
 ## Basis: Love Of All Life
 
-When thinking about how to change society for the better, the first thing that needs to be done is defining a goal which the society should aim for -- an [axiom](axiom.md) which serves as a measure of what's objectively [good](good.md) and [bad](bad.md), which in turn helps us take the right steps towards the good. This is only logical, without a goal we aren't really trying to achieve anything and "good" and "evil" are just words without any objective meaning.
+When thinking about how to change society for the better, the first thing that needs to be done is defining a goal which the society should aim for -- an [axiom](axiom.md) (in philosophy known as *first principle*) which serves as a measure of what's objectively [good](good.md) and [bad](bad.md), which in turn helps us take the right steps towards the good. This is only logical, without a goal we aren't really trying to achieve anything and "good" and "evil" are just words without any objective meaning.
 
 The basis of less retarded society is a **universal and unconditional [selfless](selflessness.md) [altruistic](altruism.md) [love](love.md) of all [life](life.md)** (life at large, i.e. not just people, but also animals and other life forms and life as a concept); the kind of love a glimpse of which you catch when you for example observe an animal play and be happy of just existing as a living being that's able to feel joy and happiness. This kind of love and the strong emotion associated with it is to us possibly the greatest miracle of the universe and so we choose to support it, make it flourish, we define it as an axiom that life which experiences joy and happiness is good. Similarly we define it as bad when life feels suffering or when there is little or even no life in the universe. **Here we set the goal for our society to support life, make it flourish, and make individual living beings feel happiness**.
 

lrs_wiki.md

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ It's also possible to see the wiki as a (somewhat dirty but constantly improving
 
 The wiki is similar to and was inspired by similar works, for example similarity could be found with the earliest (plain [HTML](html.md)) versions of [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md), also perhaps [wikiwikiweb](wikiwikiweb.md), [Jargon file](jargon_file.md) etc. In tone and political incorrectness it is more like [Encyclopedia Dramatica](dramatica.md), but unlike Dramatica LRS is a "serious" project, albeit with humor and [jokes](jokes.md) here and there.
 
-{ I also discovered later on that there used to exist similar projects in the past, e.g. https://shii.bibanon.org/shii.org/knows/Everything_Shii_Knows.html. ~drummyfish }
+{ I also discovered later on that there used to exist similar projects in the past, e.g. https://shii.bibanon.org/shii.org/knows/Everything_Shii_Knows.html. Apparently there once was a flood of personal wikis going by the *Everything X Knows* naming scheme and it's very funny this completely missed me because I reinvented the thing without knowing about it. So this might as well be named *Everything Drummyfish Knows*. ~drummyfish }
 
 **Technology "powering" LRS wiki** is plain and [simple](kiss.md), it uses no [frameworks](framework.md) or static site generators, the wiki is currently written as a collection of [Markdown](markdown.md) files that use a few [shell scripts](shell_script.md) that convert the whole thing to [HTML](html.md) for the web (and can also produce txt and pdf version), i.e. it doesn't use any wiki engine or bloated static site generators.
 

rationalization.md

@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+# Rationalization
+
+Rationalization is a [mental gymnastics](mental_gymnastics.md) technique (an "argument fallacy") in which one tries to justify (to self and/or others) doing something he wants to do (usually something [evil](evil.md)) by providing seemingly "rational" arguments in favor of the action. In [current](21st_century.md) dystopian world this is done constantly by practically everyone as a part of the "[self interest](capitalism.md) game". However, as always, best examples can be found in politics and places alike. The goal of rationalization is to justify evil, make evil look like [good](good.md) and/or make someone look not responsible for it, by exploiting the [mental shortcut](shortcut_thinking.md) "rational = good" and playing on the established [cult of science](soyence.md). It's also a way of just "saying something" when accused of evil, i.e. culturally when we're accused of evil, we're meant to start opening and closing our mouth and make some sounds, and rationalization is a great device to do it without having to think much.
+
+**Example**: [capitalists](capitalism.md) often use rationalization to justify or reject pretense based on what's best for them like this:
+
+- If pretense is bad for the capitalist, he rationalizes against is; e.g. when he has a chance to rip someone off, he'll do it and argues: "Yes, I need money and will do what I have to do to get it. Should I pretend I don't care about money when really I do? I just don't want to lie, I am just being honest!" Here he justifies lack of pretense by claiming it's a good thing (i.e. something he "should" do) as part of "honesty".
+- If pretense is good for the capitalist, he rationalizes its use; e.g. when he's doing an office job he hates and his boss shows up, he will pretend to be enjoying the work and to like the boss, even if he in fact hates him. If this is obvious to his colleagues and they confront him about it, he responds: "Yeah, you'd have to be crazy to show disgust for your work in front of your boss, right? Everyone does it, it's part of the social game and everyone must do it so that the game works, it's a culturally established behavior that everyone knows about and I just don't want to cause trouble for everyone around by rebelling against cultural expectancy." Here he justifies pretense by "respecting culture", "sustaining peace", "ends justifying means" etc.
+
+It's clear the capitalist just does what's in his personal interest and just [spits out some keywords](shortcut_thinking.md) that are meant to conjure and illusion of "rationality" to hide the selfish motives behind. Indeed, this only fools a retard, but practically everyone in society is a retard, so this technique works every time.
+
+Yet another example is the infamous [soyence](soyence.md) brain fart going as follows: "Human [races](race.md) don't exist, the concept has no significance and is unethical to research BECAUSE it is a SOCIAL CONSTRUCT invented in very old times." Of course other social constructs invented in old times such as biological species, [science](science.md) or [music](music.md) are somehow perfectly existing, useful and acceptable.
+
+## See Also
+
+- [shortcut thinking](shortcut_thinking.md)
+- [idiot fallacy](idiot_fallacy.md)

shortcut_thinking.md

@@ -2,15 +2,15 @@
 
 Shortcut thinking means making conclusions by established associations (such as "theft = bad", "[fair](fair.md) = good") rather than making the extra effort of inferring actual conclusions based on new context such as different circumstances or newly discovered facts. This isn't bad in itself, in fact it is a great and necessary [optimization](optimization.md) of our thinking process, a kind of [cache](cache.md), and it's really why we have long term memory -- imagine we'd have to deduce all the facts from scratch each time we thought about anything. However shortcut thinking can be a weakness in many situations and leaves people prone to manipulation by [propaganda](propaganda.md) which twists meanings of words (such as "open mind", ["rationality"](pseudoskepticism.md), "[progress](progress.md)", ["theft"](intellectual_property.md), ["science"](soyence.md) etc.), relying on people accepting the unacceptable by having them bypass the thinking process with the mental shortcut. As such this phenomenon is extremely abused by politicians, i.e. they for example try to shift the meaning of a certain negative word to include something they want to get rid of, to have it rejected just based on its name.
 
-Some commonly held associations appearing in shortcut thinking of common people nowadays are for example "[update](update_culture.md) = good", "[modern](modern.md) = good", "[democracy](democracy.md) = good", "[piracy](piracy.md) = theft = bad", "laziness = bad", "[fairness](fair.md) = good", "pedophiles = child rapists = bad", "legal = good", "[competition](competition.md) = [progress](progress.md) = good", "more [jobs](work.md) = good", "more [complex technology](capitalist_software.md) = better", "open mind = blindly trusting those officially declared smarter than myself = good" etc. Of those most are of course either extremely simplified or just plain wrong. however some association may still of course be correct, such as "murder = bad", which is an association that e.g. [military](military.md) tries to get rid of by calling the acts of murder they commit something else, e.g. "defense", "[justice](justice.md)" etc.
+Some commonly held associations appearing in shortcut thinking of common people nowadays are for example "[update](update_culture.md) = good", "[modern](modern.md) = good", "[democracy](democracy.md) = good", "[piracy](piracy.md) = theft = bad", "laziness = bad", "[fairness](fair.md) = good", "[pedophile](pedophilia.md) = child rapist = bad", "[legal](law.md) = good", "[rational](rationalization.md) = good", "[competition](competition.md) = [progress](progress.md) = good", "more [jobs](work.md) = good", "more [complex technology](capitalist_software.md) = better", "open mind = blindly trusting those officially declared smarter than myself = good", "safety = good" etc. Of those most are of course either extremely simplified or just plain wrong. however some association may still of course be correct, such as "murder = bad", which is an association that e.g. [military](military.md) tries to get rid of by calling the acts of murder they commit something else, e.g. "defense", "[justice](justice.md)" etc.
 
 Let's focus on the specific **example** of the association "fair = good" -- when we hear something is *fair*, we automatically give it a positive meaning, we see it as good. It is so because our society is, and mostly has been, based on [competition](competition.md) and in that fairness is key so as to ensure that the stronger wins and weaker loses, i.e. fairness is an attribute that any competitive system needs in order to work correctly. However when we start to aim to remove competitive society and replace it with [altruistic one](less_retarded_society.md) -- a society in which one doesn't have to prove his worth or be slave in order to deserve the right to live -- fairness becomes a BAD attribute. If we want the same well being for everyone, fairness is bad because it goes against this goal, it gives more to some (the stronger) than to other (the weaker).
 
 Another example is e.g. the association "theft = bad". Indeed it has some sense in it -- if we turn shortcut thinking off, we may analyze why this association exists. For most of our [history](history.md) the word theft has meant *taking a physical personal possession of someone else against his will*. Indeed, in a society of people of which most weren't rich, this was bad in most cases as it hurt the robbed man, he has lost something he probably needed. However the society evolved, the meaning of property itself has changed from "personal property" to "private property", i.e. suddenly there were people who could own a whole forest or a factory even if they have never seen it, and there were people who had much more than they needed. If a poor starving man steals food from the rich to feed his family and the rich doesn't even notice this, suddenly the situation is different and many will say this is no longer bad. Nevertheless the word theft stayed in use and now included even such cases that were ethical because of the shifted meaning of the word "property" and due to changes in conditions of people. Recently the word property was shifted to the extreme with the invention of **[intellectual property](intellectual_property.md)**, i.e. the concept of being able to own information such as ideas or stories in books. Intellectual property is fundamentally different from physical property as it can't be stolen in the same way, it can only be copied, duplicated, but this copying doesn't rid the "owner" of the original information. Indeed it may prevent the author from making a lot of money under [capitalism](capitalism.md), but that's only thanks to the artificially established system inventing ways of bullying recipients of information into paying money, the system was deliberately made so as to make non harmful things into harmful ones to fuel "[competition](competition.md)" and the situation is no longer as simple as with physical property/stealing, it's actually the underlying system that's wrong here, not actions that aren't aligned with the harmful system. And so nowadays the word "theft", or one of its modern forms, "[piracy](piracy.md)", includes also mere copying of information or even just reusing an idea ([patent](patent.md)) for completely good purposes, for example writing computer programs in certain (patented) ways is considered a theft, even if doing so is done purely to help other people at large. Those arguing that illegal downloads or reuses prevent the "owner's" profit must know that again society is completely different nowadays and this so called "theft" actually doesn't hurt anyone but some gigantic billion dollar corporation that doesn't even notice if it loses one or two million dollars, no actual human gets hurt, only a legal entity, and these so called "thefts" actually give rise to good, helpful things by at least a little more balance to society, hurting a virtual, non-living entity to help millions of actual living people. In fact, hurting a corporation, by definition a [fascist](fascism.md) entity hostile to people, may yet further be seen as a good thing in itself, so stealing from corporation is also good by this view. The illusion of profit theft here is arbitrarily made, the "theft" exists only because we've purposefully created a system which allows selling copies of information and restricting ideas and therefore enables this "theft", i.e. this is no longer a natural thing that would exist without something "preventing it", it's something miles away from the original meaning of the word "theft". With all this in mind we may, in today's context of the new meaning of old words, reconsider theft to no longer be generally bad.
 
-When confronted with a new view, political theory etc., we should try to turn shortcut thinking off; we should also do this every time someone tries to have us make a decision under a competitive system such as [capitalism](capitalism.md) as that someone is most likely trying to manipulate us. Doing this can be called **being open minded**, i.e. opening one's mind to reinterpretation of very basic, possibly strongly rooted concepts by a new view, however be careful as the meaning of the term "open mind" is often twisted too. Also we should probably update our association from time to time just to keep them up with the new state of the world, only by sitting down and thinking about the world and discussing it with the right people.
+At [LRS](lrs.md) we are unfortunately (or fortunately?) still humans with finite brain capacity and thus we're not spared of the necessity to make association too. The difference against [normies](npc.md) is that we are aware of the dangers and reevaluate shortcuts often, potentially establishing more accurate ones. Shortcuts in an LRS brain are not rarely wired in the exact opposite direction than mainstream ones, for example we generally tend to think that "[modern](modern.md) = [bloat](bloat.md) = bad", "safety/protection = reduction of [freedom](freedom.md) = bad", "piracy = sharing = good" and so on. Making better associations gets us closer to [unretardation](unretard.md). Indeed, the politics and views of [LRS](lrs.md) require extreme open mindedness to be accepted by someone indoctrinated by the standard capitalist fascist propaganda of today.
 
-The politics and views of [LRS](lrs.md) requires extreme open mindedness to be accepted by someone indoctrinated by the standard capitalist fascist propaganda of today.
+When confronted with a new view, political theory etc., we should try to turn shortcut thinking off; we should also do this every time someone tries to have us make a decision under a competitive system such as [capitalism](capitalism.md) as that someone is most likely trying to manipulate us. Doing this can be called **being open minded**, i.e. opening one's mind to reinterpretation of very basic, possibly strongly rooted concepts by a new view, however be careful as the meaning of the term "open mind" is often twisted too. Also we should probably update our association from time to time just to keep them up with the new state of the world, only by sitting down and thinking about the world and discussing it with the right people. To overcome shortcut thinking just **keep asking "why?"**, do not stop at any conclusion made by association, only stop when you arrive at a **first principle** (a moral [axiom](axiom.md)).
 
 ## Example Of Abuse
 
@@ -86,5 +86,6 @@ If you think they can't do it, [you are wrong](yes_they_can.md).
 
 - [buzzword](buzzword.md)
 - [humorwashing](humorwashing.md)
+- [rationalization](rationalization.md)
 - [idiot fallacy](idiot_fallacy.md)
 - [keyword hysteria](keyword_hysteria.md)

wiki_stats.md

@@ -3,9 +3,9 @@
 This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
 
 - number of articles: 626
-- number of commits: 984
-- total size of all texts in bytes: 5145706
-- total number of lines of article texts: 37547
+- number of commits: 985
+- total size of all texts in bytes: 5152252
+- total number of lines of article texts: 37569
 - number of script lines: 324
 - occurrences of the word "person": 10
 - occurrences of the word "nigger": 114
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
 longest articles:
 
 - [c_tutorial](c_tutorial.md): 128K
-- [exercises](exercises.md): 124K
+- [exercises](exercises.md): 128K
 - [chess](chess.md): 104K
 - [how_to](how_to.md): 80K
 - [capitalism](capitalism.md): 76K
@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@ longest articles:
 - [woman](woman.md): 48K
 - [c](c.md): 44K
 - [programming_language](programming_language.md): 44K
+- [main](main.md): 44K
 - [3d_model](3d_model.md): 44K
 - [internet](internet.md): 44K
-- [main](main.md): 40K
 - [bloat](bloat.md): 40K
 - [iq](iq.md): 40K
 - [copyright](copyright.md): 40K
@@ -35,60 +35,75 @@ longest articles:
 
 top 50 5+ letter words:
 
-- which (2836)
-- there (2221)
-- people (2175)
-- example (1799)
-- other (1607)
-- about (1428)
+- which (2839)
+- there (2228)
+- people (2177)
+- example (1801)
+- other (1613)
+- about (1431)
 - number (1337)
-- software (1289)
+- software (1293)
 - because (1180)
-- their (1107)
-- would (1077)
+- their (1108)
+- would (1078)
 - program (1061)
 - something (1059)
-- being (1039)
+- being (1045)
 - things (963)
-- called (944)
+- called (945)
 - language (940)
-- without (867)
+- without (868)
 - function (865)
-- simple (863)
+- simple (864)
 - computer (849)
 - numbers (835)
 - different (800)
 - these (787)
-- however (784)
-- programming (774)
-- world (760)
+- however (785)
+- programming (776)
+- world (761)
 - system (747)
 - should (725)
-- still (716)
+- still (717)
 - doesn (716)
 - games (694)
-- while (684)
-- society (675)
+- while (685)
+- society (676)
 - drummyfish (674)
 - point (673)
-- possible (658)
+- possible (659)
 - simply (657)
-- probably (650)
+- probably (649)
 - using (645)
 - always (635)
 - course (612)
-- similar (605)
+- similar (606)
 - actually (594)
-- someone (589)
+- someone (590)
+- though (583)
 - https (583)
-- though (582)
 - really (573)
-- basically (572)
-- first (560)
+- basically (571)
+- first (562)
 
 latest changes:
 
 ```
+Date:   Wed Mar 12 16:58:53 2025 +0100
+  acronym.md
+  exercises.md
+  interesting.md
+  lmao.md
+  lrs_dictionary.md
+  main.md
+  number.md
+  paradigm.md
+  random_page.md
+  rgb332.md
+  rgb565.md
+  rms.md
+  wiki_pages.md
+  wiki_stats.md
 Date:   Tue Mar 11 12:33:07 2025 +0100
   c_tutorial.md
   chess.md
@@ -113,27 +128,12 @@ Date:   Tue Mar 11 12:33:07 2025 +0100
   often_confused.md
   political_correctness.md
   proof.md
-  random_page.md
-  regex.md
-  shitword.md
-  smart.md
-  soyence.md
-  stereotype.md
-  suicide.md
-  wiki_pages.md
-  wiki_stats.md
-  woman.md
-Date:   Thu Mar 6 17:07:35 2025 +0100
-  education.md
-  elon_musk.md
-  exercises.md
-  free_software.md
 ```
 
 most wanted pages:
 
 - [data_type](data_type.md) (15)
-- [retard](retard.md) (13)
+- [retard](retard.md) (14)
 - [meme](meme.md) (13)
 - [embedded](embedded.md) (13)
 - [irl](irl.md) (12)
@@ -158,33 +158,33 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
 - [lrs](lrs.md) (337) 
 - [capitalism](capitalism.md) (305) 
 - [c](c.md) (239) 
-- [bloat](bloat.md) (232) 
-- [free_software](free_software.md) (198) 
+- [bloat](bloat.md) (233) 
+- [free_software](free_software.md) (199) 
 - [game](game.md) (152) 
 - [suckless](suckless.md) (149) 
 - [proprietary](proprietary.md) (134) 
 - [modern](modern.md) (123) 
-- [minimalism](minimalism.md) (119) 
+- [minimalism](minimalism.md) (120) 
+- [censorship](censorship.md) (118) 
 - [computer](computer.md) (117) 
-- [censorship](censorship.md) (117) 
+- [kiss](kiss.md) (112) 
 - [programming](programming.md) (111) 
-- [kiss](kiss.md) (111) 
 - [math](math.md) (106) 
 - [fun](fun.md) (106) 
+- [gnu](gnu.md) (105) 
 - [linux](linux.md) (104) 
-- [gnu](gnu.md) (104) 
 - [shit](shit.md) (103) 
 - [woman](woman.md) (100) 
 - [corporation](corporation.md) (97) 
+- [fight_culture](fight_culture.md) (96) 
 - [bullshit](bullshit.md) (96) 
-- [fight_culture](fight_culture.md) (95) 
 - [art](art.md) (94) 
 - [hacking](hacking.md) (93) 
 - [less_retarded_society](less_retarded_society.md) (92) 
-- [free_culture](free_culture.md) (90) 
+- [free_culture](free_culture.md) (91) 
+- [history](history.md) (87) 
 - [chess](chess.md) (87) 
 - [public_domain](public_domain.md) (86) 
-- [history](history.md) (86) 
 - ...
 - [cope](cope.md) (5) 
 - [combinatorics](combinatorics.md) (5)