Update

wikipedia.md

@@ -37,6 +37,26 @@ Let's note a few positive and negative points about Wikipedia, as of 2022. Some
 
 And the bad things are (see also this site: http://digdeeper.club/articles/wikipedia.xhtml):
 
+```
+  .-------------------------------------------------------------.
+  |                                                             |
+  |        <3 PLEASE DON'T SKIP THIS 10 MINUTE READ <3          |
+  |                                                             |
+  | RESPONSIBILITY, children and life environment now more than |
+  | ever, we are live in times when SCIENCE VERIFIED FIGHT      |
+  | RIGHTS to freedom and safe PRIVACY, PROTECTION and EXPERTS  |
+  | DEFEND, MUSTN'T STOP READ! time to ACT like LINCOLN, must   |
+  | have RESPONSIBILITY. Children and Earth are magical.        |
+  |                                                             |
+  |  Give us 20 bucks please.                                   |
+  |                                                             |
+  |  -- your encyclopedia that protects from bad information    |
+  |                                                             |
+  |  this box was personally seen and signed and approved by    |
+  |  dear C.E.O. of the encyclopedia of peer reviewed truth     |
+  '-------------------------------------------------------------'
+```
+
 - Wikipedia is **[censored](censorship.md), [politically correct](political_correctness.md), biased, pushes a harmful political propaganda and often just pure lies**, even though it [proclaims the opposite](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:What_Wikipedia_is_not#Wikipedia_is_not_censored) (which makes it much worse by misleading people). "Offensive" material and material not aligned with [pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) propaganda is removed as well as material connected to some controversial resources (e.g the link to 8chan, https://8kun.top, is censored, as well as [Nina Paley](nina_paley.md)'s Jenndra Identitty comics and much more). There is a heavy **[pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md), [pseudoskeptic](pseudoskepticism.md) and [soyence](soyence.md) bias** in the articles. It creates a list of **banned sources** ([archive](https://web.archive.org/web/20220830004126/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources)) which just removes all non-[pseudoleftist](pseudoleft.md) sources -- so much for their "neutral point of view". It wasn't always this way, browsing pre 2010 Wikipedia provides a less censored experience.
 - Wikipedia includes material under **[fair use](fair_use.md)**, such as screenshots from proprietary games, which makes it partially [proprietary](proprietary.md), i.e. Wikipedia is technically **NOT 100% free**. Material under fair use is still proprietary and can put remixers to legal trouble (e.g. if they put material from Wikipedia to a commercial context), even if the use on Wikipedia itself is legal (remember, proprietary software is legal too).
 - Wikipedia is **intentionally deceptive** -- it supports its claims by "citations" ("race is a social construct"^1234567891011121314151617181920) to make things look as objective facts, but the citations are firstly cherry picked (there is a list of banned sources), self-made (articles of Wikipedians themselves) and secondly the sources often don't even support the claim, they're literally there just for "good look". Not only do they practice censorship, they claim they do NOT practice censorship and then write article on censorship so as to define censorship in their own convenient way :) Furthermore their articles intentionally omit points of view of their political opponents.