Update

art.md

@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@
 
 *There is no indecency in art.*
 
-Art is an endeavor that seeks discovery and creation of [beauty](beauty.md) and primarily relies on intuition, its value is in feelings it gives rise to. While the most immediate examples of art that come to mind are for example [music](music.md) and painting, even the most [scientific](science.md) and rigorous effort like [math](math.md) and [programming](programming.md) becomes art when pushed to the highest level, to the boundaries of current knowledge where intuition becomes important for further development.
+Art is an endeavor (and by extension also its results) that seeks discovery and creation of [beauty](beauty.md) and primarily relies on intuition, its value is in feelings it gives rise to. While the most immediate examples of art that come to mind are for example [music](music.md) and painting, even the most [scientific](science.md) and rigorous effort like [math](math.md) and [programming](programming.md) becomes art when pushed to the highest level, to the boundaries of current knowledge where intuition becomes important for further development. Where exactly to draw the boundary for art is a matter of philosophy, culture and personal opinion, but usually art is thought to require attributes of a living human being such as something akin "soul", thinking, intuition, creativity and emotion -- that which is performed only mechanically is not seen as art. Even though latest [artificial intelligence](ai.md) shows that art can possibly be produced even by a machine, the machine has to be very sophisticated and mimic very complex human thinking -- even if made by a machine, there must be an element of [magic](magic.md) present, a touch of muse, something not completely understood, for a work to be classified as art.
 
 **Good art always needs time**, usually a lot of time, and you cannot predict how much time it will need, **art cannot be made on schedule** or as a product. By definition creating true art is never a routine (though it requires well trained skills in routine tasks), it always invents something new, something no one has done before (otherwise it's just copying that doesn't need an artist) -- in this sense the effort is the same as that of research and science or exploring previously unwalked land, you can absolutely never know how long it will take you to invent something, what complications you will encounter or what you will find in an unknown land. You simply do it, fail many times, mostly find nothing, you repeat and repeat until you find the good thing. For this art also requires a lot of effort -- yes, there are cases of masterpieces that came to be very casually, but those are as rare as someone finding a treasure by accident. Art is to a great degree a matter of chance, trial and error, the artist himself doesn't understand his own creation when he makes it, he is only skilled at searching and spotting the good, but in the end he is just someone who invests a lot of time into searching, many times blindly.
 

cheating.md

@@ -1,6 +1,8 @@
 # Cheating
 
-Cheating means circumventing or downright violating rules, usually while trying to keep such behavior secret. You can cheat on your partner, in [games](game.md), in [business](business.md) and so forth, however despite cheating seeming like purely immoral behavior at first glance, it may be relatively harmless or even completely [moral](morality.md), for instance in [computer graphics](graphics.md) we occasionally "cheat" our sense of sight and fake certain visual phenomena which leads to efficient rendering [algorithms](algorithm.md). In [capitalism](capitalism.md) cheating is demonized and people are brainwashed to partake in **cheater witch hunts** as part of [fear culture](fear_culture.md), arbitrary [drama](drama.md) in [fight](fight_culture.md) for attention, trying to monopolize game platforms with [bloat monopoly](bloat_monopoly.md) "anti cheat" systems etc. These so called "anti cheat" systems introduce unimaginable [bloat](bloat.md) and [bullshit](bullshit.md) and provide excuse for things like **[spying](surveillance.md)** (e.g. monitoring OS processes) and **[proprietary](proprietary.md) technology** (so that "cheaters can't study the system to trick it") creeping into the world of free software.
+Cheating means circumventing or downright violating rules, usually while trying to keep such behavior secret. You can cheat on your partner, in [games](game.md), in [business](business.md) and so forth, however despite cheating seeming like purely immoral behavior at first glance, it may be relatively harmless or even completely [moral](morality.md), for instance in [computer graphics](graphics.md) we occasionally "cheat" our sense of sight and fake certain visual phenomena which leads to efficient rendering [algorithms](algorithm.md). In [capitalism](capitalism.md) cheating is demonized and people are brainwashed to partake in **cheater witch hunts** as a part of new anti-cheating bullshit business, in [fear culture](fear_culture.md), arbitrary [drama](drama.md) feeding the social media [fight](fight_culture.md) for attention, trying to monopolize game platforms with [bloat monopoly](bloat_monopoly.md) "anti cheat" systems etc. These so called "anti cheat" systems introduce unimaginable [bloat](bloat.md) and [bullshit](bullshit.md) and provide excuse for things like **[spying](surveillance.md)** (e.g. monitoring OS processes) and **[proprietary](proprietary.md) technology** (so that "cheaters can't study the system to trick it") creeping into the world of free software.
+
+Official [LRS](lrs.md) stance on cheating is the following: **Cheating is fine.**
 
 The truth is that **cheating is only an issue in a [shitty](shit.md) society** that is driven by [competition](competition.md) (even if you disagree). Indeed, in such society there is a huge motivation for cheating (sometimes literally physical survival) as well as potentially disastrous consequences of it. Under the tyranny of capitalism we are led to worship [heroes](hero_culture.md) and high achievers and everyone gets pissed when we get fooled. Corporations go "OH NOES our multi billion dollar entertainment industry is going to go bankrupt if consoomers get annoyed by cheaters! People are gonna lose their bullshit jobs! Someone is going to get money he doesn't deserve! Our customers may get butthurt!!!" (as if corporations themselves weren't basically just stealing money and raping people lol). So they start a huge brainwashing propaganda campaign, a cheater witch hunt. States do the same, communities do the same, everyone wants to stone cheaters to death but at the same time the society pressures all of us to compete to death with others or else we'll starve. We reward winners and torture the losers, then bash people who try to win -- and no, many times there is no other choice than to cheat, the top of any competition is littered with cheaters, most just don't get caught, so in about 99% of cases the only way to the top is to cheat and try to not get caught, just to have a shot at winning against others. It is proven time after time, legit looking people in the top leagues of sports, business, [science](science.md) and other areas are constantly being revealed as cheaters, usually by pure accident (i.e. the number of actual cheater is MANY times higher). Take a look for instance at the [Trackmania](trackmania.md) cheating scandal in which after someone invented a replay analysis tool he revealed that a great number or top level players were just cheaters, including possibly the GOAT of Trackmania [Riolu](riolu.md) (who just ragequit and never showed again lol). Of course famous cases like Neil Armstrong don't even have to be mentioned. { I just randomly found out that in the world of Pokemon tournaments cheating at top level also showed to be a huge issue lol. ~drummyfish } Cheater detection systems are (and always will be) imperfect and try to minimize [false positives](false_positive.md), so only the cheaters who REPEATEDLY make MANY very OBVIOUS mistakes get caught, the smart cheaters stay and take the top places in the competitive system, just as surely as natural selection leads to the evolution of organisms that best adapt to the environment. Even if perfect cheat-detection systems existed, the problem would just shift from cheating to immoral unsportmanship, i.e. abuse of rules that's technically not cheating but effectively presents the same kind of problems. How to solve this enormously disgusting mess? We simply have to stop desperately holding to the system itself, we have to ditch it.
 

faq.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Now degenerated into a kind of AMA.
 
 { answers by ~[drummyfish](drummyfish.md) }
 
-### What is this all?
+### I just came here and WTF is all this shit lmao?
 
 See [tl;dr](wiki_tldr.md).
 
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ There are many reasons, it serves multiple purposes which also change a bit over
 
 ### Why is this rather not a blog?
 
-Because blogs suck, they are based on the idea of content consumerism and subscribers following celebrities just like on youtube or facebook, blog posts are hasted, ugly and become obsolete in a week, this wiki is trying to create a reference work that can be polished and will last last some time.
+Because blogs suck, they are based on the idea of content consumerism and subscribers following celebrities just like on youtube or facebook, blog posts are hasted, ugly and become obsolete in a week, this wiki is trying to create a reference work that can be polished and will last some time.
 
 ### Since it is public domain, can I take this wiki and do anything with it? Even something you don't like, like sell it or rewrite it in a different way?
 
@@ -184,6 +184,10 @@ Now when it comes to *"hating"* people, there's an important distinction to be s
 
 And yeah, of course sometimes we make [jokes](jokes.md) and sarcastic comments, it is relied on your ability to recognize those yourself. We see it as retarded and a great insult to intelligence to put disclaimers on jokes, that's really the worst thing you can do to a joke.
 
+### How can you be pro cannibalism if you advocate veganism?
+
+We advocate ethical veganism/vegetarianism, we refuse to eat meat with the goal of not having to kill animals, as we value [life](life.md) and its happiness above anything else. However this goal is actually sometimes compatible with eating meat -- it's for example fine to eat an animal that died of old age or by accident -- in fact it's probably PREFERABLE to do so because not eating a dead animal is wasteful, it is food we throw away, and eating meat is also healthy, so it's a very valuable kind of food provided we don't get it very often. People are animals too, so it applies to people as well: eating someone who died provides very rare, valuable kind of food to living beings. It's understandable that culturally people are very opposed to cannibalism, but logically it makes sense. If someone is still so extremely opposed to the idea he just won't be able to force himself to eating someone, it may be good to at least think of this: feed dead people to animals, it does the same kind of service -- some cultures practice this, see [sky burial](sky_burial.md).
+
 ### B... b... but u cant write a big work it like this.
 
 Bitch I can, I have no boss, no publisher, no sponsors, no collaborators, no paying customers, no TOS, no COC or EULA or WTF, I don't have to suck any dicks, I can write literally what I want here in any way I want -- this means the work is TRULY free, it has practically no barriers and censoring mechanisms. Why don't you do it too?
@@ -214,13 +218,13 @@ Chill your balls motherfucker, I WOULD collect all your data because I absolutel
 
 ### OH MY GAAAAAAAWD, you are sooooo [productive](productivity_cult.md), you made so many projects all yourself, what magical rituals do you perform for such PRODUCTIVITY, do you listen to motivational speeches before sleep or drink newborn blood??? TELL ME, I HAVE TO KNOW, I wanna PRODUUUUUUCEEEE!
 
-I am THE laziest bastard who EVER lived on this planet, if I seem """productive""" to you then only because I ditch all [bullshit](bullshit.md) and practice [minimalism](minimalism.md). Literally I sometimes do nothing for half a year, then I sometimes do thing here and there over weekends and in a few months I got a new thing made, it's simply the uneatable efficiency of minimalism. If I, the most anti-work, laziest, dumbest shit that ever walked this soil can make these things just by adopting minimalism, imagine what could be made by let's say three non-lazy, smart people. The world would be wonderful. Just ditch [capitalism](capitalism.md) and see it come true.
+I am THE laziest bastard who EVER walked this soil, if I seem """productive""" to you then only because I ditch all [bullshit](bullshit.md) and practice [minimalism](minimalism.md). Literally I sometimes do nothing for half a year, then I sometimes do thing here and there over weekends and in a few months I got a new thing made, it's simply the uneatable efficiency of minimalism. If I, the most anti-work, laziest, dumbest shit that ever walked this soil can make these things just by adopting minimalism, imagine what could be made by let's say three non-lazy, smart people. The world would be wonderful. Just ditch [capitalism](capitalism.md) and see it come true.
 
 ### I dislike this wiki, our teacher taught us that global variables are bad and that [OOP](oop.md) is good.
 
 This is not a question you dummy. Have you even read the title of this page? Anyway, your teacher is stupid, he is, very likely unknowingly, just spreading the capitalist propaganda. He probably believes what he's saying but he's wrong.
 
-### Lol you've got this fact wrong and you misunderstand this and this topic, you've got bugs in code, your writing sucks etc. How dare you write about things you have no clue about?
+### Lol HAHAHA you've got this fact wrong and you misunderstand this and this topic, you've got bugs in code, your writing sucks etc. How dare you write about things you have no clue about?
 
 *see also [gatekeeping](gatekeeping.md)*
 
@@ -260,6 +264,10 @@ How do I know my opinions are facts? Experience. How do we discover facts? There
 
 There is nothing egoistic about being special in something, everyone has a talent for something, egoism is about being fascist, preoccupied with oneself and focusing on self benefit, achieving fame, recognition etc., which I try my best to never do. Maybe I slip sometimes as an imperfect man I am, I make mistakes, I do stupid stuff, but I honestly just want the good of everyone without putting myself in the front.
 
+### Hey dude, you're ignorant like a monkey, this topic XYZ you're analyzing has been academically examined and blablabla, you're just reinventing the wheel, do you know that?
+
+Yeah, definitely I am ignorant of a lot of stuff, sometimes it's accidental but sometimes not, I like to derive conclusions myself and I think there is a value in reivent the wheel sometimes. Standing on the shoulders of previous generations and taking things as proven is efficient and comfortable, often a good decision, but sometimes one that will lead to missing things that could have been -- take civilizations that developed independently of each other, how different they ended up to be, they didn't necessarily converge to being the same. How can we be sure our ways are the best just because we managed to wipe out other civilizations that lived differently? Maybe they were onto something. Trying to invent things again from scratch helps us test if where we're going is really the only way, or perhaps reveal there is a better way.
+
 ### Don't you think people will leave your website when they read in the article they are being called retards?
 
 *main article: [butthurt](butthurt.md)*

free_will.md

@@ -11,3 +11,12 @@ Free will is usually discussed in relation to **[determinism](determinism.md)**,
 **Why is there no free will?** Because it isn't logically possible, just like e.g. the famous omnipotent God (could he make a toast so hot he wouldn't be able to eat it?). Either the universe is deterministic and your decisions are already predetermined, or there exists an inherent randomness and your decisions are determined by a mere dice roll (which no one can call a free will more than just making every decision in life based on a coin toss). In either case your decisions are made for you by something "external". Even if you follow a basic definition of free will as "acting according to one's desires", you find that your decisions are DETERMINED by your desires, i.e. something you did not choose (your desires) makes decisions for you. There is no way out of this unless you reject logic itself.
 
 For some reason retards (basically everyone) don't want to accept this, as if accepting it changed anything, stupid [capitalists](capitalism.md) think that it would somehow belittle their "achievements" or what? Basically just like the people who used to let go of geocentrism. This is ridiculous, they hold on to the idea of their "PRECIOOOOUUUSS FREE WILL" to the death, then they go and consume whatever a TV tells them to consume. Indeed one of the most retarded things in the universe. 
+
+## See Also
+
+- [anthropocentrism](anthropocentrism.md)
+- [snowflake](snowflake.md)
+- [magic](magic.md)
+- [determinism](determinism.md)
+- [consciousness](consciousness.md)
+- [ai](ai.md)

human_language.md

@@ -12,11 +12,13 @@ Languages are sadly often what easily divides people into groups and so fuels [f
 
 ## The Grand Curse Of Human Language
 
-{ The following is a thought dump made without much research, please inform me if you're a linguist or something and have something enlightening to say, thank you <3 ~drummyfish }
+{ The following is a thought dump made without much research, please inform me if you're a linguist or philosopher or something and have something enlightening to say, thank you <3 ~drummyfish }
 
 On one hand human languages are cool when viewed from cultural or [artistic](art.md) perspective, they allow us to write poetry, describe feelings and nature around us -- in this way they can be considered [beautiful](beauty.md). However from the perspective of others, e.g. programmers or historians, **human languages are a [nightmare](nightmare.md)**. There is unfortunately an **enormous, inherent curse connected to any human language**, both natural or constructed, that comes from its inevitably [fuzzy](fuzzy.md) nature stemming from fuzziness or real life concepts, it's the problem of **defining [semantics](semantics.md)** of words and constructs (no, Lojban doesn't solve this). [Syntax](syntax.md) (i.e. the rules that say which sentences are valid and which are not) doesn't pose such a problem, we can quite easily define what's grammatically correct or not (it's not as hard to write a program that checks gramatical correctness), it is semantics (i.e. meanings) that is extremely hard to grasp -- even in rigorous languages (such as mathematical notation or programming languages) semantics is a bit harder to define (quite often still relying on bits of human language), but while in a programming language we are essentially able to define quite EXACTLY what each construct means (e.g. `a + b` returns the sum of values *a* and *b*), in a natural language we are basically never able to do that, we can only ever form fuzzy connections between other fuzzy concepts and we can never have anything fixed.
 
-Due to this fuzziness human languages inevitably change over time no matter how hard we try to counter this, any text written a few thousand years ago is nowadays very hard to understand -- not because the old languages aren't spoken anymore, but because the original meanings of specific words, phrases and constructs are distorted by time; when learning an old language we learn what each word meant by reading its translation to some modern word, but the modern word is always more or less different. Even if it's a very simple word such as "fish", our modern word for fish means a slightly different thing than let's say ancient Roman's word for fish because it had slightly different connotations such as potential references to other things: fish for example used to be the symbol of Christianity, nowadays people don't even commonly make this connection. Fishermen were a despised class of workers, to some fish may have signified food and abundance, to others something that "smells bad", to others something or someone who's "slippery". Some words may have referred to some contemporary "[meme](meme.md)" that's been long forgotten and if some text makes the reference, we won't understand it. The word "book" for example meant something a bit different 2000 years ago than it means now: back then a book might have been just a relatively short scroll, it was expensive and people didn't read books the same way as we do today, they commonly just read them out loud to others, so "reading a book" and the word "book" itself doesn't conjure the same picture in our heads as it did back then. Or another example showing the difference between languages existing at the same time is this: while the Spanish word "perro" translates to English as "dog", the meanings aren't the same; some English speakers use the word as a synonym for "friend" but in Spanish the word can be used as an insult so shouting "perro" and "dog" in the street may lead to different (possibly completely opposite) images popping up in the heads of those who hear it. How do you describe a word precisely if you can only describe it with other imprecise words that are changing constantly? No, not even pictures will help -- if you attach the picture of a cat to the word "cat", it's still not clear what it means -- does it stand for the picture of the cat or for the cat that's in the picture, does it stand ONLY for the one cat that's in the picture or all other animals that are similar to the one in the picture? How similar? Is lion a cat? Is a toy cat or cartoon cat a cat? Or does the picture signify that anything with a fur is a cat? If it looks like cat but walks on two legs and speaks, is it still a cat? Now imagine describing a more abstract term such as *thought*, *number* or *existence*. There is no solid ground, even such essential words as "to want" or "to be" have different meanings between languages ("to be" can stand for "to exist", "to be in a place", "to temporarily have some property", "to permanently have some property" etc.). Even dictionaries admit defeat and are happy with having circular definitions because there aren't any foundations to build upon, circular definitions are inevitable, dictionaries just help you connect fuzzy concepts together. All of this extends to tenses, moods, cases and everything else. This can be very well seen e.g. with people interpreting old texts such as the Bible, for example some say [Jesus](jesus.md) claimed to be the son of God while others reject it, saying that even if he stated the sentence, it actually wasn't meant literally as it was a commonly used phrase that meant something else -- these people will argue about everything and they can comfortably interpret the same text in completely opposite ways. The point is that we just can't know.
+Due to this fuzziness human languages inevitably change over time no matter how hard we try to counter this, any text written a few thousand years ago is nowadays very hard to understand -- not because the old languages aren't spoken anymore, but because the original meanings of specific words, phrases and constructs are distorted by time; when learning an old language we learn what each word meant by reading its translation to some modern word, but the modern word is always more or less different. Even if it's a very simple word such as "fish", our modern word for fish means a slightly different thing than let's say ancient Roman's word for fish because it had slightly different connotations such as potential references to other things: fish for example used to be the symbol of Christianity, nowadays people don't even commonly make this connection. Fishermen were a despised class of workers, to some fish may have signified food and abundance, to others something that "smells bad", to others something or someone who's "slippery". Some words may have referred to some contemporary "[meme](meme.md)" that's been long forgotten and if some text makes the reference, we won't understand it. The word "book" for example meant something a bit different 2000 years ago than it means now: back then a book might have been just a relatively short scroll, it was expensive and people didn't read books the same way as we do today, they commonly just read them out loud to others, so "reading a book" and the word "book" itself doesn't conjure the same picture in our heads as it did back then. Or another example showing the difference between languages existing at the same time is this: while the Spanish word "perro" translates to English as "dog", the meanings aren't the same; some English speakers use the word as a synonym for "friend" but in Spanish the word can be used as an insult so shouting "perro" and "dog" in the street may lead to different (possibly completely opposite) images popping up in the heads of those who hear it. Westerners who spend a lot of time in eastern countries will confirm that it is absolutely the case that many eastern spiritual terms and texts are untranslatable to English, or translatable only very, very imprecisely: there are words for concepts that western culture simply lacks and even words that have more or less direct translation may carry different connotations, such as the word "void" which in the east has often a positive connotation, unlike in the west. When you study philosophy, you'll be told you have to read philosophers in their original language in order to really understand them. Imagine you speak to an isolated bushmen tribe somewhere in Africa and you have to translate the word "vaporwave" or "doomer meme" when they don't have a word for Internet, computer or electricity, they don't know what depression, multimedia or technological addiction is and can't even comprehend the concept of a social network because they have hard time imagining there could exist many more people in the world, being unable to count beyond 10, thinking the world probably ends beyond the horizon -- you may perhaps say "vaporwave" is "funny music" and "doomer meme" is a "sad idea", but you know it's actually a very poor translation. It's not because their language was be poorer than yours (in fact many of such languages have been found to be extremely hard to learn), it will just have evolved to express other things, ones you can't understand, complex things about nature, jungle, hunting, hundreds of different plants, what's edible and what's poisonous (in which ways, to whom, with what certainty, in which quantities, under which circumstances, ...), subtle distinctions of many different species of animals, rocks, water, trees, fire, weather and so on. Even within our own culture we struggle to communicate, depressed people have hard time explaining what depression really is to people who never experienced true depression, we use words like "sadness", "emptiness", "exhaustion", but once again, only as rough approximations to the true, indescribable feeling.
+
+How do you describe a word precisely if you can only describe it with other imprecise words that are changing constantly? No, not even pictures will help -- if you attach the picture of a cat to the word "cat", it's still not clear what it means -- does it stand for the picture of the cat or for the cat that's in the picture, does it stand ONLY for the one cat that's in the picture or all other animals that are similar to the one in the picture? How similar? Is lion a cat? Is a toy cat or cartoon cat a cat? Or does the picture signify that anything with a fur is a cat? If it looks like cat but walks on two legs and speaks, is it still a cat? Now imagine describing a more abstract term such as *thought*, *number* or *existence*. There is no solid ground, even such essential words as "to want" or "to be" have different meanings between languages ("to be" can stand for "to exist", "to be in a place", "to temporarily have some property", "to permanently have some property" etc.). Even dictionaries admit defeat and are happy with having circular definitions because there aren't any foundations to build upon, circular definitions are inevitable, dictionaries just help you connect fuzzy concepts together. All of this extends to tenses, moods, cases and everything else. This can be very well seen e.g. with people interpreting old texts such as the Bible, for example some say [Jesus](jesus.md) claimed to be the son of God while others reject it, saying that even if he stated the sentence, it actually wasn't meant literally as it was a commonly used phrase that meant something else -- these people will argue about everything and they can comfortably interpret the same text in completely opposite ways. The point is that we just can't know.
 
 { Just one more of other countless examples I recently encountered: it used to be generally believed that [Jesus](jesus.md) was crucified so that he was nailed on the cross through his palms, however it was shown this wouldn't work and also other evidence showed people were nailed more in the arms, in a way that would hold the weight of the body but wouldn't hit the artery. The confusion came from translation -- the Greek word for "hand" also includes part of an arm, i.e. the word for hand in Greek is different from the word hand in some other languages. ~drummyfish }
 

lotr.md

@@ -1,7 +1,17 @@
 # Lord of the Rings
 
-TODO
+Lord of the Rings (LOTR) is a an epic fantasy book trilogy by J. R. R. Tolkien (1892-1973), one of the greatest ever made, released in 1954, followed by very well made movies in 2001, 2002 and 2003; the books are legendary not just for having started the whole modern fantasy genre, but simply for their sheer gigantic volume of lore and detail, including additional books, detailed geography of the fantasy world, its history, mythology and several [constructed languages](conlang.md), into which the author, a university professor, poured his whole life and heart. Unfortunately for their immense popularity the works have been seized and absolutely raped by [capitalism](capitalism.md), nowadays they have become a vehicle for propaganda -- it's incredibly sad but true. Although the books are still [proprietary](proprietary.md), their entering to [public domain](public_domain.md) is at least on the horizon -- unlike most modern fantasy works, Lord of the Rings should enter the public domain relatively "soon": in 2044. Besides the main LOTR trilogy Tolkien also wrote several related works, such as *The Hobbit* (the prequel, more of a children book) and *The Silmarillion* (kind of "Bible" of his universe).
 
-**A piece of recent history that's been [censored](censorship.md) from the Internet and which they don't want you to see**: In 2002 [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md) hijacked the franchise to not just blatantly milk it for money, but at the same time abuse it to spread [SJW](sjw.md) propaganda, creating an absolute garbage, soulless "spin off" series called "Rings of Power" with added [afroamerican](nigger.md) dwarves, lesbian elves and other kind of monstrosities that are an absolute dehonestation of Tolkien's art. The trailer posted on [YouTube](youtube.md) was ABSOLUTE DISASTER, with 27 million views it only gained 110 thousand likes versus 27 million dislike, making it one of the worst received videos in history, and not surprisingly so: it was just pure, blatantly showing evil. In the comment section people expressed their disgust, every single comment read the following Tolkien's quite: **"Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good"**. Youtube had to **remove the dislike** button from their site so that people could no longer express their opinion and resist evil. It's important to repeat this: people started protesting so the overlords just remove the way to protest, and people just accepted this. This event is now very much censored and very hard to find, searching for it just gives you links to the show itself. If this is not a dystopia yet, it's hard to say what is.
+NOTE: **Anything post 2005 is NOT part of Lord of the Rings.** It's very important to note this because the franchise became one of the most raped milking cows of [capitalist](capitalism.md), [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md), [SJWs](sjw.md) and other evil. Only look for pre-2005 stuff.
+
+For [copyright](copyright.md) reasons detailed **plot** summary can't be posted here, thank copyright faggots. Yes, [Wikipedia](wikipedia.md) does it and no, it can't be done under [free culture](free_culture.md), [fair use](fair_use.md) is not free culture and Wikipedia is a [joke](joke.md). Very briefly: the story takes place in Middle Earth, a fantasy land, and is about a hobbit (a [race](race.md) of short people, distinct from dwarves) named Frodo who, with the help of many other characters (so called Fellowship of the Ring), carries an "evil" magical ring -- a thing potentially usable as a kind of superweapon -- to Mordor, the land where all evil dwells, to destroy it in Mount Doom, the only place where it can in fact be destroyed, and so prevent anyone from using this superweapon. In the story there is very much apparent a great high contrast between good and evil and highlights of various virtues and moral values, it is kind of an epic fairytale for adults.
+
+{ Is it fkn good or not? Yes, it's great. I grew up when the movies were coming out and it was the hype of my generation, although at the time I felt it wasn't absolutely brilliant, and objectively it probably isn't (Tolkien wasn't a professional writer, he was just making it as a pet project "on the go"), in retrospect it is indeed an awesome story, very well told. Fucking go read it, or at least watch the movies FFS, but NEVER watch The Hobbit movie or the toxic lesbian shit after that, it's better to die than to see it. ~drummyfish }
+
+**A piece of recent history that's been [censored](censorship.md) from the Internet and which they don't want you to see**: In 2002 [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md) hijacked the franchise to not just blatantly milk it for money, but at the same time abuse it to spread [SJW](sjw.md) propaganda, creating an absolute garbage, soulless "spin off" series called "Rings of Power" with added [afroamerican](nigger.md) dwarves, lesbian elves and other kind of monstrosities that are an absolute dehonestation of Tolkien's art. The trailer posted on [YouTube](youtube.md) was ABSOLUTE DISASTER, with 27 million views it only gained 110 thousand likes versus 27 million dislike, making it one of the worst received videos in history, and not surprisingly so: it was just pure, blatantly showing evil. In the comment section people expressed their disgust, every single comment read the following Tolkien's quote: **"Evil is not able to create anything new, it can only distort and destroy what has been invented or made by the forces of good"**. Youtube had to **remove the dislike** button from their site so that people could no longer express their opinion and resist evil. It's important to repeat this: people started protesting so the overlords just remove the way to protest, and people just accepted this. This event is now very much censored and very hard to find, searching for it just gives you links to the show itself. If this is not a dystopia yet, it's hard to say what is.
 
 **[LMAO](lmao.md) THIS IS NOT CLICKBAIT:** They don't want you to see this! On the LOTR DVD there were many and many bonuses for the movies and one of them was a humorous discussion of Ben Stiller, Vince Vaughn and Peter Jackson (Ju-DEMryNOA on [YT](yt.md)) -- in it they firstly joked about making up some sequels to milk the franchise a bit, which ummm, already happened by now (:D), BUT not just that. They also jokingly suggested making a [gay](gay.md) version of the movies AND a version with [black](black.md) characters, complete with mock up posters and shit :D It's so hilarious watching it nowadays when all of this is happening but UNIRONICALLY. I swear [SJWs](sjw.md) are going to be burning these DVDs soon, it's funny as hell. Download it and save it before it's gone.
+
+## See Also
+
+- [Harry Potter](harry_potter.md)

number.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ WIP kind of
 
 { There's most likely a lot of BS, math people pls send me corrections, thank u. ~drummyfish }
 
-Numbers (from Latin *numerus* coming from a Greek word meaning "to distribute") are one of the most elementary [mathematical](math.md) objects, building stones serving most often as quantitative values (that is: telling count, size, length, order etc.), in higher math also used in much more [abstract](abstraction.md) ways which have only distant relationship to traditional counting. Examples of numbers are minus [one](one.md) half, [zero](zero.md), [pi](pi.md) or [i](i.md). Numbers constitute the basis and core of mathematics and as such they sit almost at the [lowest level](low_level.md) of it, i.e. most other things such as algebra, [functions](function.md) and [equations](equation.md) are built on top of numbers or require numbers to even be examined. In modern mathematics numbers themselves aren't on the absolute bottom of the foundations though, they are themselves built on top of [sets](set.md), as set theory is most commonly used as a basis of whole mathematics, however for many purposes this is just a formalism that's of practical interest only to some mathematicians -- on the other hand numbers just cannot be avoided anywhere, by a mathematician or just a common folk. The word *number* may be the first that comes to our mind when we say *mathematics*. The area of [number theory](number_theory.md) is particularly focused on examining numbers (though it's examining almost exclusively integer numbers because these seem to have the deepest pattern related e.g. to divisibility).
+Numbers (from Latin *numerus* coming from a Greek word meaning "to distribute") are one of the most elementary [mathematical](math.md) objects, building [stones](rock.md) serving most often as quantitative values (that is: telling count, size, length, order etc.), in higher math also used in much more [abstract](abstraction.md) ways which have only distant relationship to traditional counting. Examples of numbers are minus [one](one.md) half, [zero](zero.md), [pi](pi.md) or [i](i.md). Numbers constitute the basis and core of mathematics and as such they sit almost at the [lowest level](low_level.md) of it, i.e. most other things such as algebra, [functions](function.md) and [equations](equation.md) are built on top of numbers or require numbers to even be examined. In modern mathematics numbers themselves aren't on the absolute bottom of the foundations though, they are themselves built on top of [sets](set.md), as set theory is most commonly used as a basis of whole mathematics, however for many purposes this is just a formalism that's of practical interest only to some mathematicians -- on the other hand numbers just cannot be avoided anywhere, by a mathematician or just a common folk. The word *number* may be the first that comes to our mind when we say *mathematics*. The area of [number theory](number_theory.md) is particularly focused on examining numbers (though it's examining almost exclusively integer numbers because these seem to have the deepest pattern related e.g. to divisibility).
 
 Let's not [confuse](often_confused.md) numbers with digits or figures (numerals) -- a number is a purely abstract entity while digits serve as symbols for numbers so that we can write them down. One number may be written in many ways, using one of many [numeral systems](numeral_system.md) (Roman numerals, tally marks, Arabic numerals of different [bases](base.md) etc.), for example 4 stands for a number than can also be written as IV, four, 8/2, 16:4, 2^2, 4.00 or 0b100. There are also numbers which cannot exactly be captured within our traditional numeral systems, for some of them we have special symbols -- most famous example is of course [pi](pi.md) whose digits we cannot ever completely write down -- and there are even numbers for which we have no symbols at all, ones that are yet not well researched and are only described by equations to which they are the solution. Sure enough, a number by itself isn't too interesting and probably doesn't even make sense, it's only in context, when it's placed in relationship with other numbers (by ordering them, defining operations and properties based on those operations) that patterns and useful attributes emerge.
 

piracy.md

@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 # "Piracy"
 
-Piracy is a [capitalist](capitalism.md) propaganda term for the act of illegally sharing copyrighted information such as [non-free](proprietary.md) books, movies, music, video [games](game.md) or scientific papers.
+Piracy is a [capitalist](capitalism.md) propaganda term for the act of illegally sharing [copyrighted](copyright.md) [information](information.md) such as [non-free](proprietary.md) books, movies, music, video [games](game.md) or scientific papers.
 
 It is greatly admirable to support piracy, however also keep in mind the following: if you pirate a [proprietary](proprietary.md) piece of information, you get it gratis but it stays proprietary, it abuses you, it limits your freedom -- you won't get the source code, you won't be able to publicly host it without being bullied, you won't be allowed to legally create and share derivative works etc. Therefore **prefer [free (as in freedom)](free_culture.md) alternatives to piracy**, i.e. pieces of [information](information.md) that are not only gratis but also freedom supporting.
 

wiki_stats.md

@@ -3,12 +3,12 @@
 This is an autogenerated article holding stats about this wiki.
 
 - number of articles: 606
-- number of commits: 922
-- total size of all texts in bytes: 4604238
-- total number of lines of article texts: 34519
+- number of commits: 923
+- total size of all texts in bytes: 4607751
+- total number of lines of article texts: 34526
 - number of script lines: 294
 - occurrences of the word "person": 9
-- occurrences of the word "nigger": 99
+- occurrences of the word "nigger": 100
 
 longest articles:
 
@@ -35,22 +35,22 @@ longest articles:
 
 top 50 5+ letter words:
 
-- which (2563)
+- which (2565)
 - there (1991)
-- people (1833)
+- people (1837)
 - example (1560)
-- other (1440)
+- other (1442)
 - number (1277)
-- about (1266)
+- about (1269)
 - software (1214)
 - program (1010)
 - because (1004)
-- their (980)
+- their (983)
 - would (948)
 - something (898)
-- being (895)
+- being (896)
 - things (876)
-- called (867)
+- called (869)
 - language (854)
 - numbers (811)
 - simple (808)
@@ -65,17 +65,17 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
 - system (671)
 - doesn (652)
 - should (647)
-- while (634)
+- while (636)
 - games (629)
 - still (627)
 - point (619)
 - drummyfish (613)
 - society (600)
 - simply (596)
-- possible (586)
+- possible (587)
 - using (581)
+- https (560)
 - though (558)
-- https (558)
 - always (554)
 - course (552)
 - similar (546)
@@ -84,11 +84,26 @@ top 50 5+ letter words:
 - memory (535)
 - really (525)
 - technology (520)
-- value (517)
+- value (518)
 
 latest changes:
 
 ```
+Date:   Fri Nov 15 17:05:37 2024 +0100
+  capitalism.md
+  crypto.md
+  egoism.md
+  how_to.md
+  jokes.md
+  lotr.md
+  main.md
+  nigger.md
+  often_confused.md
+  random_page.md
+  shitword.md
+  wiki_pages.md
+  wiki_stats.md
+  woman.md
 Date:   Thu Nov 14 20:34:08 2024 +0100
   algorithm.md
   ashley_jones.md
@@ -109,25 +124,6 @@ Date:   Thu Nov 14 20:34:08 2024 +0100
   wiki_stats.md
   wikipedia.md
 Date:   Wed Nov 13 01:37:31 2024 +0100
-  4chan.md
-  ashley_jones.md
-  bill_gates.md
-  chaos.md
-  chess.md
-  cloudflare.md
-  drummyfish.md
-  exercises.md
-  freedom.md
-  how_to.md
-  lgbt.md
-  lotr.md
-  low_poly.md
-  lrs_dictionary.md
-  niggercoin.md
-  often_confused.md
-  pascal.md
-  pedophilia.md
-  programming_language.md
 ```
 
 most wanted pages:
@@ -156,7 +152,7 @@ most wanted pages:
 most popular and lonely pages:
 
 - [lrs](lrs.md) (314) 
-- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (262) 
+- [capitalism](capitalism.md) (263) 
 - [c](c.md) (233) 
 - [bloat](bloat.md) (225) 
 - [free_software](free_software.md) (189) 
@@ -165,18 +161,18 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
 - [proprietary](proprietary.md) (129) 
 - [minimalism](minimalism.md) (111) 
 - [computer](computer.md) (106) 
+- [censorship](censorship.md) (106) 
 - [modern](modern.md) (105) 
-- [censorship](censorship.md) (104) 
-- [fun](fun.md) (101) 
+- [fun](fun.md) (102) 
 - [kiss](kiss.md) (100) 
 - [math](math.md) (98) 
 - [gnu](gnu.md) (96) 
 - [programming](programming.md) (95) 
 - [linux](linux.md) (94) 
 - [shit](shit.md) (91) 
+- [fight_culture](fight_culture.md) (89) 
 - [bullshit](bullshit.md) (89) 
 - [hacking](hacking.md) (88) 
-- [fight_culture](fight_culture.md) (88) 
 - [less_retarded_society](less_retarded_society.md) (84) 
 - [corporation](corporation.md) (84) 
 - [free_culture](free_culture.md) (83) 
@@ -184,7 +180,7 @@ most popular and lonely pages:
 - [woman](woman.md) (82) 
 - [public_domain](public_domain.md) (82) 
 - [chess](chess.md) (81) 
-- [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md) (79) 
+- [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md) (80) 
 - ...
 - [bilinear](bilinear.md) (5) 
 - [backpropagation](backpropagation.md) (5) 

wiki_tldr.md

@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 
 New? Confused? Many articles? Tl;dr:
 
-- this is not a satire, we are serious (but we make [jokes](jokes.md) too, you must spot them, don't be stupid)
+- this is NOT a satire, we are serious (but we make [jokes](jokes.md) too, you must spot them, don't be retarded)
 - [axiom](axiom.md): **[life](life.md) is good, suffering of life is bad**
 - unconditionally **[love](love.md) LITERALLY EVERYONE** (animals, [gays](gay.md), Nazis, murderers, retards, ...) -- NOT for religious reasons, only because they are alive
 - **do TRULY [selfless](selflessness.md) things** (give away for free, don't expect even indirect rewards, only a good feeling) -- NOT for religious reasons, only because it makes life happy
@@ -34,6 +34,19 @@ New? Confused? Many articles? Tl;dr:
   - everything "[modern](modern.md)"
   - [consumerism](consumerism.md)
   - ...
+- Things we say are OK:
+  - **[cheating](cheating.md)**
+  - **[trolling](trolling.md)**
+  - **[conspiracy theories](conspiracy_theory.md)**
+  - **[cannibalism](cannibalism.md)** (if killing is involved, consent is needed)
+  - **political incorrectness, absolutely [free speech](free_speech.md)**
+  - any kind of sex of ANYONE with ANYONE or ANYTHING (CONSENSUAL, NO VIOLENCE):
+    - **[pedophilia](pedophilia.md)** (CONSENSUAL, NO VIOLENCE)
+    - **necrophilia** (if killing is involved, consent is needed)
+    - **[zoophilia](zoophilia.md)** (CONSENSUAL)
+    - **[incest](incest.md)** (preferably with birth control)
+    - ...
+  - ...
 - establish **[less retarded society](less_retarded_society.md) (LRS)**: [anarcho pacifist](anpac.md) [communist](communism.md) peaceful society, everything's free, everything's allowed, no need for laws because we have morals, no forced [work](work.md), no [money](money.md), no states, no [bullshit](bullshit.md), no police, no [censorship](censorship.md), ...
 - slow **evolution** (education, true rationality, ...), **NOT revolution** (hysteria, violence, ...)
 - we are TRUE left and don't fall under any traditional politics (i.e. right or [pseudoleft](pseudoleft.md)), that's why you're confused
@@ -44,7 +57,7 @@ New? Confused? Many articles? Tl;dr:
   - ...
 - accept truth ([races](race.md) are real, [women](woman.md) are stupid, we live in dystopia, society can't be saved, ...)
 - **THINK**, question ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING, don't identify or adopt what you're offered, stop conforming, stop relying on others, create, educate, lead an example, ...
-- NOTE: own culture is forming here (language, in-jokes, memes, own definitions etc.), it may be harder to hop in (e.g. we never say we [fight](fight_culture.md) anything, we hate the [p-word](person.md), "he" is the default pronoun, we hate [coding](coding.md) but love programming, we hate [open $ource](open_source.md) but love [free software](free_software.md), we never say we are "[proud](pride.md)" of anything, ... -- see also [shitword](shitword.md))
+- NOTE: unique culture is forming here (language, values, in-jokes, memes, own definitions etc.), it may be harder to hop in (e.g. we never say we [fight](fight_culture.md) anything, we hate the [p-word](person.md), "he" is the default pronoun, we hate [coding](coding.md) but love programming, we hate [open $ource](open_source.md) but love [free software](free_software.md), we never say we are "[proud](pride.md)" of anything, ... -- see also [shitword](shitword.md))
 - ...
 
 ## See Also

woman.md

@@ -51,6 +51,8 @@ also https://encyclopediadramatica.gay/Woman :D
 - Just chill and enjoy your privileges, find a man who will feed you so that you don't have to work, have kids, be a good mother, just be cool.
 - ...
 
+Women are also disallowed in [sumo](sumo.md) because of their menstrual shit or something.
+
 ## Men Vs Women In Numbers
 
 Here is a comparison of men and women in numbers that are still possible to be found in already highly censored sources. Of course, the numbers aren't necessarily absolutely up to date, at the time or reading they may be slightly outdated, also keep in mind that in the future such comparisons may become much less objective due to [SJW](sjw.md) forces -- e.g. because of [trans](tranny.md) athletes in sports we may see diminishing differences between measurements of performance of men and "women" because what in the future will be called women will be just men pretending to be women.

zoomer.md

@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+# Zoomer
+
+Zoomers (also *GenZ* or *technoslave*) are weird aliens that started to be born instead of real people from around late [1990s](1990s.md), they come after [millenials](millenial.md), the last generation of true people to have appeared on [Earth](earth.md). Zoomers are very scary, like slenderman from creepypasta, basically robotic entities born from normal people, no longer having real emotion or normal taste, ability to see what looks good or bad or what's nice and what's degenerated, they are just born to hold a cellphone and [consume](consumerism.md) ads that appear on the display served by the [corporations](corporation.md). Usually they look like the mentioned slenderman: two to three meters tall -- due to having grown up in [21st century](21st_century.md) and only eating genetically modified chicken -- but extremely anorexic and wearing broccoli haircut, constantly looking down into the [smartphone](smartphone.md) which the zoomer's organism needs to survive; without smartphone a zoomer falls into coma and dies within 24 hours. Zoomers are absolute slaves to [technology](tech.md) (without knowing how it works), mental [illnesses](disease.md) (of which they must have at least 10) as well as sexual confusion -- zoomer has no idea what gender or even species he is, he thinks he is a [rabbit](furry.md) hermaphrodite or [transsexual](transsexual.md) fluid or afroamerican jewish spiderman or something, it would just be weird for him to be a normal man or [woman](woman.md). He also thinks only about [sex](sex.md) from the day he is born, he can't watch even a child fairytale without sexually analyzing every scene and painting [rule 34](rule34.md) scenarios in his head, he has addiction to masturbation, porn, [Internet](internet.md), [ads](marketing.md), food, [ricing](ricing.md), TikTok videos and basically just everything he comes to contact with. Zoomer chicks are practically just a walking ass with tiny head on top, they have trousers pulled up below armpits like Clint Eastwood, to showcase that gigantic ass (despite actually protesting sexualization of women).
+
+TODO
+
+## See Also
+
+- [NPC](npc.md)